22
lengths, cost of operations specific to operators in terms of various business
parameters such as business models, fleet utilization, scale of operations, etc.
Specification of (normative) VGF Caps upfront has therefore been
considered important to ensure transparent operation of a market based
mechanism under this Scheme rather than through determination subsequent
to receipt of varied proposals.
2.5.2 Specifying VGF Caps that satisfy all players would inevitably end up being
high and therefore uneconomical from the perspective of Scheme outcome.
Accordingly, VGF Caps have been specified with reference to a broad
representative data set / typical cost of operations and estimated revenue
potential for operations on a typical RCS Route for a particular stage length.
2.5.3 VGF to be provided for each RCS Seat under the Scheme will be capped for
different stage lengths for fixed wing aircraft (including seaplanes) and
different flight duration for helicopters operation.
2.5.4 The applicable VGF caps for operations through Category-1A, Category-1,
Category-2 and Category-3 fixed wing aircraft for a particular stage length
(“VGF Cap”), and VGF Cap for helicopter operation for different flight
duration, have been specified at Annexure - 3 to this Scheme. As mentioned
in Section 1.4.1.19e), for operations through a Category-1 and Category-1A
fixed wing aircraft (including seaplanes), the stage length for an RCS Route
shall be limited to 500 km and for operations through a Category-2 and
Category-3 fixed wing aircraft (including seaplanes), the stage length for an
RCS Route shall be limited to 600 km.
2.5.5 Airline operators must refer to VGF Cap(s) before submitting proposals, as
support requirement in excess of such cap for a particular stage length will
not be considered under the Scheme. Any proposal not complying with this
aspect will be disqualified.
2.5.6 As mentioned earlier, VGF is proposed to be provided for a limited period to
facilitate / stimulate regional air connectivity to un-served / under-served
areas such that the connectivity established is not dependent on VGF in
perpetuity.
2.5.7 It is expected that competition between players and differences in
expectations on business parameters like airfares on Non-RCS Seats, load
factors, etc. could lead to variations in proposals by different players. While,
it is the intent and focus of the Scheme that operation of a market based
mechanism facilitates discovery of the optimum VGF requirements within
specified VGF Caps, MoCA recognizes that in certain cases it is possible
that a market based discovery of optimum VGF requirements may not
happen due to lack of competition / uncertainty in market conditions and ex-
post, the specified (normative) VGF Caps may end up seeming to be higher
than the actual VGF requirement in future on account of factors like higher
airfares for Non-RCS Seats, higher load factors etc. Given that the focus of
the Scheme is to provide air connectivity where it does not exist, the