1
Regional Connectivity Scheme
(RCS or the Scheme)
Ministry of Civil Aviation,
Government of India
Version 4.0 November 2019
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
307
2
Contents
1 Scheme Objectives and Guiding Principles ..................................................................... 5
1.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 5
1.2 Scheme Objective ................................................................................................... 7
1.3 Guiding Principles of the Scheme ........................................................................... 7
1.4 Definitions .............................................................................................................. 8
2 Features of the Scheme ................................................................................................. 14
2.1 Key Constructs...................................................................................................... 14
2.2 Airports / Water Aerodromes / Helipads to be covered under the Scheme ............. 19
2.3 Airfare Caps .......................................................................................................... 20
2.4 Aircraft Categories ................................................................................................ 21
2.5 VGF Cap............................................................................................................... 21
2.6 RCF Allocation ..................................................................................................... 24
2.7 ASKMs on RCS Flights ........................................................................................ 25
2.8 Exclusivity of operations ....................................................................................... 25
2.9 Miscellaneous ....................................................................................................... 26
3 Operating Mechanism of the Scheme ............................................................................ 27
3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 27
3.2 Eligibility Criteria for Proposals ............................................................................ 27
3.3 Minimum Performance Specifications for an RCS Flight ...................................... 29
3.4 Submission of Initial Proposals ............................................................................. 30
3.5 Network Proposal.................................................................................................. 31
3.6 Proposal submission requirements ......................................................................... 32
3.7 Identification of RCS Routes as part of Initial Proposal(s) ..................................... 34
3.8 Selection of proposals for counter bidding............................................................. 35
3.9 Invitation of Counter Proposals ............................................................................. 36
3.10 Evaluation of proposals and Applicant selection .................................................... 37
3.11 Evaluation of Financial Proposal for an Individual Route Proposal ....................... 38
3.12 Evaluation of Financial Proposals for a Network Proposals ................................... 39
3.13 Evaluation of Financial Proposals for Simultaneous Proposals .............................. 40
3.14 Right to Match ...................................................................................................... 42
3.15 Performance Guarantee ......................................................................................... 44
3.16 Change in deployed capacity ................................................................................. 45
3.17 Prioritisation Framework ....................................................................................... 48
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
308
3
3.18 Exit from the Scheme ............................................................................................ 49
3.19 Reporting Obligations for a Selected Airline Operator .......................................... 49
3.20 Disbursement of Funds ......................................................................................... 50
Annexure 1A: List of Underserved Airports / Airstrips in the country .............................. 52
Annexure 1B: List of Unserved Airports / Airstrips in the country.................................... 53
Annexure 1C: List of Water Aerodromes ......................................................................... 58
Annexure 1D: List of airports in areas other than Priority Area(s) that would support
operation of Category 1A aircraft ........................................................................................ 59
Annexure 2: Airfare Cap under RCS ................................................................................ 63
Annexure 3: VGF Cap under RCS .................................................................................... 65
Annexure 4: Airfare Cap Indexation Formula ................................................................... 68
Annexure 5: VGF Cap Indexation Formula ...................................................................... 71
Annexure 6A: List of airports under prioritization framework .......................................... 72
Annexure 6B: List of select routes received under previous rounds of UDAN connecting
airports mentioned in Annexure 6A ..................................................................................... 73
Annexure 7 List of routes proposed to be connected by State Governments or other
agencies .............................................................................................................................. 75
Annexure 8: List of North Eastern Region (NER) Routes ................................................. 82
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
309
4
List of Abbreviations
i. AAI: ....................................................................................... Airports Authority of India
ii. AOP: ................................................................................................ Air Operator Permit
iii. ASF: ............................................................................................... Aviation Security Fee
iv. ATF: .............................................................................................. Aviation Turbine Fuel
v. CPI: ................................................................................................ Consumer Price Index
vi. DF: ....................................................................................................... Development Fee
vii. DGCA: .................................................................... Directorate General of Civil Aviation
viii. GDP: .......................................................................................... Gross Domestic Product
ix. GST .............................................................................................. Goods and Service Tax
x. ICAO: .............................................................. International Civil Aviation Organization
xi. INR: ........................................................................................................... Indian Rupees
xii. IT: .............................................................................................. Information Technology
xiii. MoCA: .................................................................................... Ministry of Civil Aviation
xiv. NCAP: .............................................................................. National Civil Aviation Policy
xv. PLF: ............................................................................................. Passenger Load Factor
xvi. PSU: ........................................................................................ Public Sector Undertaking
xvii. RCF: ..................................................................................... Regional Connectivity Fund
xviii. RCS: ................................................................................. Regional Connectivity Scheme
xix. RDG: ..................................................................................... Route Dispersal Guidelines
xx. RNFC: ........................................................................ Route Navigation Facility Charges
xxi. RTM: ....................................................................................................... Right To Match
xxii. TNLC: .................................................................. Terminal Navigation Landing Charges
xxiii. UDF: ............................................................................................ User Development Fee
xxiv. VAT: .................................................................................................... Value Added Tax
xxv. VGF: ............................................................................................. Viability Gap Funding
xxvi. SAO ……………………………………………………..Selected Airline
Operator
xxvii. CAR……………………………………………….………Civil Aviation Requirement
xxviii. NEC…………………………………………………….…….North Eastern Council
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
310
5
1 Scheme Objectives and Guiding Principles
1
1.1 Background
1.1.1 The Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA), Government of India released the
National Civil Aviation Policy 2016 (NCAP 2016). One of the objectives of
NCAP 2016 is to “enhance regional connectivity through fiscal support and
infrastructure development”.
1.1.2 As per an ICAO study - Economic benefits of civil aviation: ripples of
prosperity”, the output and employment multipliers of aviation are 3.25 and
6.10 respectively. This implies that every 100 Rupees spent on air transport
contributes to 325 Rupees worth of benefits, and every 100 direct jobs in air
transport result in 610 jobs in the economy as a whole. In fact, the study
attributes over 4.5% of the global Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to civil air
transport.
1.1.3 As the Indian economy grows, consumption-led growth in populated metros
is expected to spill over to hinterland areas. This is also expected to be on
account of factors of production (land, labor, etc.) becoming costlier in the
densely populated metro cities. In this scenario, air connectivity can provide
required impetus to the economic growth of regional centers (towns / cities).
1.1.4 In this context, one of the key objectives of NCAP 2016 is to “establish an
integrated eco-system which will lead to significant growth of civil aviation
sector, which in turn would promote tourism, increase employment and lead
to a balanced regional growth”.
1.1.5 NCAP 2016 also seeks to sustain and nurture a competitive market
environment in the civil aviation sector. While it would be best for growth in
the sector and establishment of regional air connectivity to materialize
through open market mechanisms in terms of airlines assessing demand on
various routes, developing networks through deployment of appropriate
capacities & technologies, infrastructure developing in sync with demand,
etc. it was felt that facilitating / stimulating regional air connectivity would
be desirable from a public policy perspective and may need financial
support, at least in the initial period, to trigger participation of players. It is
in this context that NCAP 2016 provides for a Regional Air Connectivity
Scheme (RCS or the Scheme).
1.1.6 The operation of the Scheme is proposed to be through a market mechanism
where operators will assess demand on routes; submit proposals for
operating / providing connectivity on such route(s); seek VGF, if any, while
committing to certain minimum operating conditions; and the same shall be
1
This document is not a contract and does not create any enforceable rights and obligations. Terms and conditions of
operations under the scheme would be contained in a suitable contract to be signed between the Implementing Agency and the
Selected Airline Operator.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
311
6
finalized in interaction with other market participants as provided for in this
Scheme.
1.1.7 MoCA acknowledges that different / same aircraft operated by different
operators for the same stage lengths can have different cost of operations
because of differences in inherent economics of aircraft types for various
stage lengths, cost of operations specific to operators in terms of various
business parameters such as business models, fleet utilization, scale of
operations, etc. Specification of (normative) VGF Caps upfront has,
therefore been considered important to ensure transparent operation of a
market based mechanism under this Scheme rather than through
determination subsequent to receipt of varied proposals.
1.1.8 While, it is the intent and focus of the Scheme that operation of a market
based mechanism facilitates discovery of the optimum VGF requirements
within specified VGF Caps, MoCA recognizes that in certain cases it is
possible that a market based discovery of optimum VGF requirements may
not happen due to lack of competition / uncertainty in market conditions and
ex-post, the specified (normative) VGF Caps may end up seeming to be
higher than the actual VGF requirement in future on account of factors like
higher airfares for Non-RCS Seats, higher load factors, etc. Given that the
focus of the Scheme is to provide air connectivity where it does not exist, the
quantum or probability of such eventualities / outcomes in future cannot be
ascertained by MoCA and potentially even the market ex-ante on account of
the multiplicity of unascertainable factors. Further, the Scheme is premised
on and continuing to encourage an open market mechanism where operators
will be assessing demand on routes, developing networks through
deployment of appropriate capacities & technologies, and take risks on
account of factors like marketing of capacities, realizable demand, effect of
ATF prices on costs / fares for Non-RCS Seats, etc. Accordingly, in
consultation with stakeholders, MoCA recognizes that the risks retained with
the operators have to be seen in their entirety.
1.1.9 MoCA had earlier released three versions of the Scheme, in December 2016
(“Version 1.0”), in September 2017 (“Version 2.0”), and in October 2018
(“Version 3.0”). Subsequently, MoCA and AAI conducted bidding processes
and awarded a number of RCS Routes to the Selected Airline Operators. It is
hereby clarified that the provisions contained under this Scheme document
shall be applicable to:
1.1.9.1 any bidding process which may be conducted by MoCA, the
Implementing Agency or the RCS Trust, as the case may be; and
1.1.9.2 any Selected Airline Operator Agreement and any other
agreement(s) which may be entered into by the Implementing
Agency or the RCS Trust, as the case may be, with any Selected
Airline Operator,
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
312
7
1.1.9.3 on or after the date of notification of this Scheme for awarding the
concessions/support provided in this Scheme.
For the avoidance of any doubt, the bidding processes conducted, and the
Selected Airline Operator Agreements and any other agreements/documents
executed, pursuant to the Scheme Version 1.0, Scheme Version 2.0, or
Scheme Version 3.0 shall continue to be governed under and in accordance
with the provisions of the such Scheme Version 1.0, Scheme Version 2.0, or
Scheme Version 3.0 and any other document(s) issued by MoCA and/or the
Implementing Agency pursuant to the Scheme Version 1.0 or Scheme
Version 2.0 or Scheme Version 3.0.
1.2 Scheme Objective
1.2.1 The primary objective of RCS is to facilitate / stimulate regional air
connectivity by making it affordable.
1.2.1.1 Promoting affordability of regional air connectivity is envisioned
under RCS by supporting airline operators through (1) concessions
by Central Government, State Governments (reference deemed to
include Union Territories as well, unless explicitly specified
otherwise) and airport operators to reduce the cost of airline
operations on regional routes / other support measures and (2)
financial (viability gap funding or VGF) support to meet the gap, if
any, between the cost of airline operations and expected revenues
on such routes.
1.3 Guiding Principles of the Scheme
1.3.1 Given the focus and objectives of NCAP 2016, the key guiding principles
for RCS would be:
1.3.1.1 State Governments’ buy-in and support to determine
eligibility: In view of the fact that (1) NCAP 2016 is seeking to
make regional air connectivity affordable and (2) limited financial
(VGF) support is being generated from within the sector, it is
important that cost of operations are minimized for air transport
operators to the extent possible through concessions from State
Governments - especially in view of economic benefits (regional
development as well as output & employment related) to the local
catchments / economies through provision of such air transport
services.
1.3.1.2 RCS is accordingly to be made operational only in States and at
airports/ Water Aerodromes / Helipads (irrespective of ownership
by AAI / State Governments / private entities / Ministry of
Defence, Government of India) which demonstrate their
commitment and support to regional air transport operations by
providing concessions / support as required under the Scheme.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
313
8
1.3.1.3 Rationale of Regional Connectivity Fund (RCF): RCS is one of
the key elements of NCAP 2016, which envisions domestic
ticketing of 30 crores by 2022 and 50 crores by 2027. RCS as well
as NCAP 2016 would eventually promote growth of the entire civil
aviation sector.
1.3.1.4 RCS would lead to creation of regional air connectivity / services
that would have spin-off benefits within the sector in terms of
passengers taking other flights (not under RCS) and using airports /
airport services that are not at concessional rates under RCS.
Accordingly, the Regional Connectivity Fund (RCF) is to be
funded through application of a levy on scheduled flights being
operated within India or through any other sources, as per
notifications issued by the Ministry of Civil Aviation from time to
time. The RCF would thus channel funds generated from the sector
to stimulate further growth and development of the sector and the
operators (/ passengers) providing (/ using) services on domestic
routes where such fee per departure is levied would be eligible to
avail benefits under the Scheme for providing (/ using) services
pursuant to this Scheme.
1.3.1.5 Demand driven mechanism: The MoCA would like to see
airlines operating in a competitive environment and accordingly
development of regional air connectivity routes is proposed to be
left to market forces such that airlines undertake assessment of
demand and nature of supply required on particular routes and lead
the process under RCS.
1.3.1.6 Sustainability of operations: A key guiding principle would be to
encourage sustainability of operations under RCS in the long term
such that the connectivity established is not dependent on VGF in
perpetuity. Accordingly, under RCS, VGF is proposed to be
provided for a limited period to facilitate / stimulate regional air
connectivity to un-served / under-served areas. However, it is
recognized that for select Priority Areas, funding may need to be
provided for longer periods of time to support provision of air
transport services to such areas.
1.3.1.7 Periodic review of RCS: Acknowledging the fact that market
dynamics will change over time, MoCA may amend various
Scheme provisions from time to time as and when necessary for
efficacy in accomplishment of objectives and undertake a review at
least once every 3 years.
1.4 Definitions
1.4.1 In line with NCAP 2016 and in order to operationalize the Scheme, unless
the context requires otherwise, following terms under the Scheme shall have
the meanings ascribed below:
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
314
9
1.4.1.1 ‘Additional Performance Guarantee’ shall mean a security in the
form of an unconditional and irrevocable bank guarantee for an
amount of INR one (1) crore to be submitted by a Selected Airline
Operator to the Implementing Agency pursuant to Section 3.15.3
within 30 days from the date of issuance of Letter of Award (LOA)
to such Selected Airline Operator or as extended from time to time
by the Implementing Agency, provided that for operations through
seaplanes or helicopters under the Scheme, Additional Performance
Guarantee shall not be applicable.
1.4.1.2 ‘Airfare Cap’ shall mean the maximum permissible airfare for an
RCS Seat as specified under the Section 2.3.2 and 2.3.3 of the
Scheme and as published / updated on AAI / MoCA website from
time to time.
1.4.1.3 Financial Quarter shall mean a continuous period of three (3)
calendar months ending on 30th June, 30th September, 31st
December and 31st March, as the case may be.
1.4.1.4 ‘Helipad’ shall mean a designated area for landing and take-off of
helicopter(s) where scheduled and/or non-scheduled commercial
helicopter operations can be permitted as per DGCA regulations.
1.4.1.5 ‘Implementing Agency’ shall be as defined under Section 2.1.1.
1.4.1.6 ‘Minimum Performance Specifications’ shall mean the service
conditions mentioned in Section 3.3 which must be met by a
Selected Airline Operator for operation of RCS Flights.
1.4.1.7 ‘Non-RCS Route’ shall mean a route, which is not an RCS Route.
1.4.1.8 ‘Non-RCS Seat(s) shall mean revenue passenger seat(s) on an
RCS Flight, which are not RCS Seats within the RCS Flight
Capacity. Further, such seats can be offered/ deployed as per the
commercial operations of the Selected Airline Operator.
1.4.1.9 North Eastern Region Routeor NER Route shall mean the
routes listed in Annexure 8, as updated by the Implementing
Agency from time to time
1.4.1.10 Lakshadweep Specific Route The route of “Cochin - Agatti”
(to and fro) currently operating on nomination basis.
1.4.1.11 ‘Performance Guarantee’ shall mean performance security in the
form of an unconditional and irrevocable bank guarantee to be
submitted by a Selected Airline Operator to the Implementing
Agency pursuant to Section 3.15.2, within 30 days from the date of
issuance of Letter of Award (LOA) to such Selected Airline
Operator or as extended from time to time by the Implementing
Agency.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
315
10
1.4.1.12 ‘Priority Area(s) shall mean the States of Jammu and Kashmir,
Himachal Pradesh & Uttarakhand, North Eastern Region of India,
Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Lakshadweep Islands.
1.4.1.13 ‘Priority RCS Route’ shall mean an RCS Route in which, at least
one of the origin and destination airport is an RCS Concession
Airport located in Priority Area(s), provided that in case of
connection between two airports, at least one of the RCS
Concession Airport should satisfy the definition of Underserved
Airport or Unserved Airport.
1.4.1.14 ‘Regional Connectivity Fund (RCF)’ shall mean the fund /
corpus created through application of a levy on scheduled flights
being operated within India or through any other sources, as per the
notifications issued by the Ministry of Civil Aviation from time to
time.
1.4.1.15 ‘RCS Airport shall mean any airport licensed / approved by
DGCA or Water Aerodrome or Helipad, as the case may be
(whether under the ownership of the AAI, State Governments,
private entities or the Ministry of Defence, Government of India),
as notified by MoCA from time to time.
1.4.1.16 ‘RCS Concession Airport’ shall mean an RCS Airport, for which
the State Government and airport / Water Aerodrome / Helipad
owner / operator have extended concessions / support measures as
specified under NCAP 2016 and presented under Section 2.1.2 of
this Scheme.
1.4.1.17 ‘RCS Flight’ shall mean a domestic flight using a fixed wing
aircraft (including seaplanes) or a helicopter, operated by a
Selected Airline Operator pursuant to this Scheme on an RCS
Route and satisfying the conditions specified in Section 3.3.
1.4.1.18 ‘RCS Flight Capacity’ shall mean the maximum number of
passenger seats per RCS Flight offered on an RCS Route, provided
that such number of passenger seats offered cannot be less than
70% of aircraft’s passenger seating capacity, i.e., the total number
of passenger seats onboard for an aircraft. The remaining seats, i.e.,
aircraft passenger seating capacity other than RCS Flight Capacity,
if any, can be offered/ deployed as per the commercial operations
of the Selected Airline Operator.
1.4.1.19 RCS Route’ shall mean:
1) a non-stop air service connection (also referred to as a
route) between an identified pair of origin and destination
airports / Water Aerodromes / Helipads within India
proposed / operated pursuant to the Scheme, satisfying all of
the following conditions:
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
316
11
a) at least one of the origin or destination points is an RCS
Concession Airport. Provided that in case of a non-stop air
service connection between two airports, at least one of the
RCS Concession Airport should satisfy the definition of
Underserved Airport or Unserved Airport, on the Scheme
release date (Scheme Version 4.0), in which an application
is made pursuant to this Scheme.
b) for fixed wing aircraft (excluding sea planes) there have
been no scheduled commercial flights on such a route for
the last two (2) flight schedules as published by the DGCA
on its website, OR in case of operations through seaplanes
/ helicopter, there have not been more than 50 commercial
operations, whether scheduled or otherwise, on such a
route for the last 1 year as certified by the Airports
Authority of India as provider of the Air Navigation
Services such time periods to be reckoned with respect to
the Scheme release date (Scheme Version 4.0) in which an
application is made pursuant to this Scheme.
c) Provided that, for route(s) which have been awarded under
the Scheme as RCS Routes as part of an Individual Route
Proposal or a Network Proposal where (i) the Selected
Airline Operator has not yet commenced operations and /
or (ii) where the Letter of Award issued to the Selected
Airline Operator or the Selected Airline Operator
Agreement for such route(s) is in force, shall not be
considered for bidding under the Scheme.
d) for a route where the condition specified in Sub-Section b)
is satisfied on the Scheme release date (Scheme Version
4.0) and subsequently at any stage during the bidding
process, up to the date of signing of the Selected Airline
Operator Agreement, an airline / seaplane operator /
helicopter operator commences operation on such route
without any support/concession under the Scheme, such
route shall be treated as per the provisions of Section 3.2.2;
e) the stage length (in km as per the flight path declared by
AAI) between the origin and destination airports is not
more than 600 kms for operations through Category-2 and
Category3 fixed wing aircraft and is not more than 500
kms for operations through Category-1 and Category1A
fixed wing aircraft (including seaplanes).
2) any State RCS Routes, defined in 1.4.1.23
3) on and from April 01, 2020, any North Eastern Region Route
4) Lakshadweep Specific Routes, as defined in 1.4.1.9
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
317
12
Provided that State RCS Routes, NER Routes and Lakshadweep
Specific Route shall also be considered as RCS Routes even if they
do not satisfy the conditions listed at (a) and (b) and (c) above.
1.4.1.20 ‘RCS Seat(s)shall mean the number of passenger seats to be sold
at or below the applicable Airfare Cap by the Selected Airline
Operator within the RCS Flight Capacity and shall be subject to
Section 3.3 of the Scheme.
1.4.1.21 Selected Airline Operatoror “SAO” shall mean a fixed wing
aircraft or seaplane or helicopter operator selected pursuant to the
mechanism specified under the Scheme for providing air
connectivity on an RCS Route.
1.4.1.22 ‘Served Airport’ shall mean any airport, which is not an Unserved
Airport or an Underserved Airport.
1.4.1.23 State RCS Routes’ or ‘SRCS shall mean the unconnected routes
connecting two Served Airports, suggested by the respective State
Governments.
1.4.1.24 ‘Underserved Airport’ shall mean any airport which is not an
Unserved Airport and at which, there are no more than seven (7)
scheduled commercial flight departures per week as per the latest
flight schedule published by the DGCA on its website.
Provided that, for airports in Priority Area(s), the above definition
shall read as:
1.4.1.25 ‘Underserved Airport’ shall mean any airport which is not an
Unserved Airport and at which, there are no more than fourteen
(14) scheduled commercial flight departures per week as per the
latest flight schedule published by the DGCA on its website.
Provided further that, for determination of number of scheduled
commercial flight departures per week from an airport, route(s)
which have been awarded under the Scheme as RCS Routes as part
of an Individual Route Proposal or a Network Proposal where (i) the
Selected Airline Operator has not yet commenced operations and /
or (ii) where the Letter of Award issued to the Selected Airline
Operator or the Selected Airline Operator Agreement for such
route(s) is in force, , shall also be considered.
1.4.1.26 ‘Unserved Airport’ shall mean any airport at which, there have
been no scheduled commercial flights during the last two (2) flight
schedules published by the DGCA on its website.
1.4.1.27 ‘Viability Gap Funding or VGF’ shall mean the financial support
provided to the Selected Airline Operator for operation of RCS
Flight(s) from the Regional Connectivity Fund pursuant to this
Scheme.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
318
13
1.4.1.28 ‘Tenure of VGF Support’ shall have the meaning as ascribed in
Section 2.1.5 of this Scheme.
1.4.1.29 Water Aerodrome shall mean a designated area for landing and
take-off of seaplane(s) where scheduled and/or non-scheduled
commercial seaplane operations can be permitted as per DGCA
regulations and applicable law.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
319
14
2 Features of the Scheme
2.1 Key Constructs
2.1.1 Designation of Implementing Agency and its responsibilities
2.1.1.1 The Ministry of Civil Aviation may designate any entity as the
Implementing Agency under this Scheme and such entity shall be
responsible for undertaking tasks and activities for implementation
of the Scheme. As provided in NCAP 2016, the Implementation
Agency shall be provided appropriate administrative charges for
implementing the Scheme, as may be determined by MoCA from
time to time. The Implementing Agency has been permitted to
form a trust for performing its responsibilities under the Scheme
(hereinafter referred to as Regional Air Connectivity Fund
(RACF) Trust”).
2.1.1.2 Responsibilities of the Implementing Agency shall include inter
alia:
1) Receiving proposals submitted by the Applicants and taking
necessary administrative actions for identification of Selected
Airline Operator pursuant to the Scheme;
2) Acting for and on behalf of MoCA for collection and
disbursement of funds - In order to facilitate the collection
and disbursement of funds under the Scheme, a bank account
shall be established for this purpose with an identified bank.
The Implementing Agency through the RACF Trust shall be
authorized to deposit funds into, and withdraw funds from,
the bank account for disbursement of VGF to Selected Airline
Operators in accordance with this Scheme;
3) As provided in NCAP 2016, payment of VGF will be made to
the Selected Airline Operator from the RCF and the State
Governments will be asked to reimburse the applicable share
(20% for states other than for North-Eastern States and Union
Territories of India, where the ratio will be 10%) towards
VGF for respective RCS Routes. However, for the routes
classified as State RCS Routes (as listed in Annexure 7) and
Lakshadweep Specific Route, the State Governments and
Ministry of Home Affairs respectively, shall be responsible
for reimbursing 100% of the VGF amount for such routes
which are awarded pursuant to the bidding process under the
Scheme. The Implementing Agency shall be responsible for
managing accounts / statements with respect to RCF
collections, payments to Selected Airline Operators and
reimbursements from State Governments including, inter alia,
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
320
15
any required communications seeking payments,
reimbursements, reconciliation of accounts, etc.;
4) The Implementing Agency shall be responsible to compute
and notify revision of Airfare Caps and VGF Caps as well as
approved airfare and VGF as part of various Selected Airline
Operator Agreements in accordance with the Scheme on
quarterly basis; and
5) Any other tasks and activities required for implementation of
the Scheme.
2.1.1.3 The Airports Authority of India (AAI) is being designated as the
Implementing Agency under this Scheme.
2.1.2 Mechanism for Provision of Financial Support
2.1.2.1 Under this Scheme, support shall be provided to Selected Airline
Operator(s) in the form of VGF and other concessions / support
offered by the Central Government, State Governments and airport
/ Water Aerodrome / Helipad operators as detailed below.
2.1.2.2 Concessions offered by the Central Government are as follows:
1) Excise Duty at the rate of 2% shall be levied on Aviation
Turbine Fuel (ATF), drawn by Selected Airline Operators at
RCS Airport(s) for RCS Flights, for a period of three (3)
years from the date of notification of this Scheme. Upon
transition to GST, rates will be applicable as determined
under GST and exemptions/ concessions shall be given as
permissible so that such a reduced level of taxation could
ideally be continued.
2) Selected Airline Operators will have the freedom to enter into
code sharing arrangements with domestic as well as
international airlines pursuant to applicable regulations and
prevailing air service agreements. For avoidance of doubt, the
concessions and VGF under the Scheme shall be available
only to the Selected Airline Operator for the RCS Route and
shall continue as finalized pursuant to the mechanism
outlined under the Scheme.
2.1.2.3 Concessions / support offered by the respective State Governments
at RCS Concession Airports within their States are as follows. The
notification and MOUs with the State Governments are available at
https://www.aai.aero/en/rcs-udan:
1) Reduction of VAT to 1% or less on ATF at RCS Concession
Airports located within the State for a period of ten (10) years
from the date of notification of this Scheme. Upon transition
to GST, rates will be applicable as determined under GST and
exemptions/ concessions shall be given as permissible so that
such a reduced level of taxation could ideally be continued.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
321
16
2) Coordinating with oil marketing companies for provision of
fueling infrastructure on best effort basis.
3) Provision of minimum land, if required, free of cost and free
from all encumbrances for development of RCS Concession
Airports and also provide multi-modal hinterland
connectivity (road, rail, metro, waterways, etc.) as required;
4) Provision of security and fire services free of cost at RCS
Concession Airports through appropriately trained personnel
and appropriate equipment as per applicable standards and
guidelines by relevant agencies;
5) Provision of, directly or through appropriate means,
electricity, water and other utility services at substantially
concessional rates at RCS Concession Airports; and
6) Provision of a 20% share towards VGF for respective RCS
Routes pertaining to the State, provided the share of States in
the North-Eastern region of India and Union Territories
would be 10%. Similarly, provision of 100% share towards
VGF for respective State RCS Routes as proposed by the
State Government and awarded under the Scheme.
2.1.2.4 State Governments, at their discretion, may consider extending any
additional support (such as marketing support) for promotion of
RCS Flights.
2.1.2.5 Concessions offered by the airport / Water Aerodrome / Helipad
operators are as follows:
1) Airport / Water Aerodrome / Helipad operators (whether
under the ownership of the AAI, State Governments, private
entities or the Ministry of Defence, Government of India)
shall not levy Landing Charges and Parking Charges or any
other charge subsuming a charge for such aspects in future on
RCS Flights including ASF / UDF charges among others.
2) Selected Airline Operators shall be allowed to undertake
ground handling for their RCS Flights at all airports / Water
Aerodromes / Helipad.
3) AAI shall not levy any Terminal Navigation Landing Charges
(TNLC) on RCS Flights.
4) Route Navigation and Facilitation Charges (RNFC) will be
levied by AAI on a discounted basis @ 42.50% of Normal
Rates on RCS Flights. Normal Rates refer to applicable rates
specified by the AAI on its website from time to time without
any discounts or concessions.
Provided that the concessions offered by the airport operator, State
Government, and Central Government shall not be available for
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
322
17
RCS Flights operating on State RCS Routes, providing
connectivity to areas other than Priority Area(s).
2.1.3 Incentives for Cargo Operations under this Scheme shall be as follows:
2.1.3.1 As provided for in NCAP 2016, air freighter operations at RCS
Airports are entitled to the following concession under the Scheme
for a period of up to 10 years from the date of notification of the
Scheme Version 1.0:
1) Excise Duty at the rate of 2% shall be levied on ATF drawn
for air freighter operations at RCS Airports for a period of
three (3) years from the date of notification of this Scheme.
Upon transition to GST, rates will be applicable as
determined under GST and exemptions/ concessions shall be
given as permissible so that such a reduced level of taxation
could ideally be continued.
2) Airport / Water Aerodrome / Helipad operators (whether
under the ownership of the AAI, State Governments, private
entities or the Ministry of Defence, Government of India)
shall not levy Landing Charges and Parking Charges or any
other charge subsuming a charge for such aspects in future;
3) AAI shall not levy any Terminal Navigation Landing Charges
(TNLC);
4) Route Navigation and Facilitation Charges (RNFC) will be
levied by AAI on a discounted basis @ 42.50% of Normal
Rates. Normal Rates refer to applicable rates specified by the
AAI on its website from time to time without any discounts
or concessions.
2.1.3.2 Under this Scheme, VGF support shall not be provided for cargo
operations.
2.1.4 Tenure of the Scheme
2.1.4.1 In line with NCAP 2016, the Scheme will be applicable, subject to
periodic review, for a period of 10 years from the date of
notification of Scheme Version 1.0 by the MoCA.
2.1.4.2 Consistent with the objectives of the Scheme, it is the intent of the
MoCA and the Implementing Agency to continue with the Scheme
for the period specified in 2.1.4.1 above unless unforeseen or
exceptional circumstances - such as a court order or other factors
beyond the control of the MoCA, constrain the ability of the MoCA
and/or the Implementing Agency to continue with the Scheme. In
the aforesaid circumstances, the Implementing Agency shall
endeavor to honor agreements already entered into with Selected
Airline Operators for the remaining term of such agreements.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
323
18
2.1.4.3 If however, the MoCA and / or the Implementing Agency is
required to immediately withdraw the Scheme and / or suspend or
cancel agreements entered into pursuant to the Scheme, in such an
event, notwithstanding anything mentioned in this Scheme, the
MoCA, the Implementing Agency, concerned State Governments,
concerned airport / Water Aerodrome / Helipad operators, or any
other agency supporting any of these entities shall not be liable for
any loss or damage suffered by the Selected Airline Operator, save
and except for the obligation of the Implementing Agency to
disburse the applicable VGF amount for RCS Flight operations
already undertaken prior to withdrawal / discontinuation of the
Scheme.
2.1.5 Tenure of VGF Support
2.1.5.1 Subject to Section 2.1.4.2 above, VGF will be provided for RCS
Flights for a period of three (3) years from the date of
commencement of RCS Flight operations on any RCS Route under
a Selected Airline Operator Agreement (Tenure of VGF Support).
2.1.5.2 Even if during such period of three (3) years, an RCS Route ceases
to satisfy any of the conditions for an RCS Route as specified
under this Scheme, payment of VGF, exclusivity of operations (as
mentioned in Section 2.8) and other concessions, as mentioned in
Section 2.1.2.2, Section 2.1.2.3 and Section 2.1.2.5 respectively, to
the Selected Airline Operator under an existing agreement shall
continue to be provided till the expiry of such period of three (3)
years. Subsequent to the completion of such period of three (3)
years, such benefits to the Selected Airline Operator shall be
discontinued.
2.1.6 Specific routes promoted under the Scheme
2.1.6.1 Given the availability of infrastructure, strategic considerations as
well as to ensure social and economic cohesion of certain regions
in the country, the Ministry of Civil Aviation, Government of India
intends to enhance air connectivity to specific regions in the
country. Accordingly, Annexure - 6 of the Scheme document
provides a list of routes comprising routes cancelled in the previous
rounds of RCS, routes proposed by NEC / State Governments /
ministry / department, and routes that did not receive any bid in the
past.
2.1.6.2 Similarly, certain routes in the North East Region of the country, as
listed in Annexure 8, are currently operated under an arrangement
with the Ministry of Development of North Eastern Region and the
Ministry of Civil Aviation. The said arrangement for such routes is
set to expire on 31
st
March 2020. The benefit available for the RCS
routes would be available for the given routes.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
324
19
2.1.6.3 Also, the route connecting “Cochin Agattiis currently operated
by Alliance Air. The Ministry of Home Affairs intends to promote
the route (to and fro) and invite more airlines to operate this route.
Accordingly, as an exception to the Scheme, the Cochin-Agatti
route has been incorporated under the current version of the
Scheme to provide additional connectivity to the island region. All
concessions available on an RCS Route or to an RCS Flight, except
for exclusivity of operations, shall be available for the given route
as well.
2.1.6.4 During the bidding process, the above mentioned routes shall be
given a priority as per the prioritization framework provided later
in the Scheme.
2.2 Airports / Water Aerodromes / Helipads to be covered under
the Scheme
2.2.1 The Scheme will be applicable with respect to RCS Concession Airports.
2.2.2 The list of RCS Concession Airports as finalized in consultation with the
State Governments, will be published for information of stakeholders from
time to time.
2.2.3 In case any airline operator wishes to connect an airport / Water Aerodrome
/ heliport that is not an RCS Concession Airport, it may approach the
Implementing Agency and submit an expression of interest based on which
the Implementing Agency will coordinate with the concerned agencies for
extending the relevant concessions specified under the Scheme. In case any
such airport is a defence airport, approval from the Ministry of Defence,
Government of India will need to be obtained for permitting joint use / civil
operations under the Scheme.
2.2.4 In case any rehabilitation / upgradation of infrastructure is required at
airports / Water Aerodromes / Helipad to make them operational / suitable
for proposed RCS Flight operations, the same can be undertaken by AAI
upon payment of appropriate costs of such rehabilitation / upgradation works
from respective State Government/airport/Water Aerodrome/Helipad
operator. In such cases, the ownership and operatorship of such airport(s) /
Water Aerodrome(s) / Helipad(s) will continue with the State Government /
existing airport / Water Aerodrome / Helipad operator. Such airports / Water
Aerodromes / Helipad shall be operationalized subject to extant laws and
after obtaining any No Objection Certificate, if required, from existing
airport operators pursuant to existing contracts awarded by Central
Government / State Government / PSUs or any other stipulations in this
regard.
2.2.5 An indicative list of Underserved Airports and Unserved Airports in India is
placed at Annexure 1A and Annexure 1B respectively. An indicative list
of Water Aerodromes in India is provided at Annexure 1C.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
325
20
2.3 Airfare Caps
2.3.1 In line with NCAP 2016, Airfare Caps will be applicable for operations
under the Scheme.
2.3.2 The Selected Airline Operator shall not allowed to charge airfare more than
Maximum Airfare, except for GST as specified in Section 2.3.3 below. It is
hereby clarified that airfare for all passenger seats on an RCS Flight will not
be subject to any levies or charges imposed by the airport / Water
Aerodrome / Helipad operators (whether under the ownership of the AAI,
State Governments, private entities or the Ministry of Defence, Government
of India) including charges such as ASF, DF and UDF. However, for SRCS
Routes providing connectivity to areas other the Priority Areas(s), the SAO
shall be permitted to levy charges of ASF, DF and UDF as may be levied by
the respective airport / Water Aerodrome / heliport operators, over and
above the applicable Maximum Airfare for such route.
2.3.3 The Airfare Caps specified for various stage lengths / flight duration in this
Scheme, as may be indexed pursuant to provisions herein, would be
considered exclusive of applicable GST (both CGST and SGST) and the
SAO shall be permitted to charge applicable GST over and above the
Maximum Airfare.
2.3.4 Considering that operating costs for a flight vary with stage length / flight
duration, Airfare Caps have been specified for various stage lengths / flight
duration for fixed wing aircraft (including seaplanes) and helicopter, and
placed at Annexure-2 to this Scheme. As mentioned above, Airfare Caps
specified for various stage lengths / flight duration are exclusive of
applicable GST.
2.3.5 MoCA recognizes that changes in ATF prices, inflation, and exchange rate
of INR vis-à-vis United States Dollar, have a bearing on cost of operations
of airlines and in a market-based pricing scenario airlines can vary airfares
in response to changes in these parameters. In the context of RCS and
specification of Airfare Cap, it was considered important to the operation of
RCS that changes to Airfare Caps as well as Maximum Airfare in future are
also specified. Hence, the Airfare Caps as well as Maximum Airfare will be
indexed to inflation i.e. Consumer Price Index Industrial Workers (CPI-
IW), ATF prices and exchange rate of INR vis-à-vis United States Dollar .
For operation through helicopter the airfare charged on RCS seats would be
indexed to inflation i.e. Consumer Price Index Industrial Workers (CPI-
IW), only.
2.3.6 The indexation of Airfare Cap and Maximum Airfare to inflation, ATF
prices and exchange rate of INR vis-à-vis United States Dollar will be based
on the formula specified in Annexure - 4 and determined for every Financial
Quarter. The proportions in the formula have been determined with
reference to a broad representative data set / typical cost of operations for
airline operators.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
326
21
2.3.7 MoCA also recognizes that airlines will need advance notice for effecting
changes in their systems for revision in fares and has considered a one (1)
month notice period for revision of Airfare Caps and Maximum Airfare(s)
approved under the Scheme. The Airfare Caps and Maximum Airfare(s)
applicable for a Financial Quarter will be published by the Implementing
Agency one (1) month in advance (i.e. on 01st March for the Financial
Quarter starting 1st April).
2.3.8 It may be noted that currently CPI-IW data is released by the Government of
India with a lag of one (1) month (e.g. CPI-IW for the month of October is
released on 30th November), it being recognized that such lag period may
vary over time. Considering the notice period of one (1) month mentioned
above and lag of 1 month in publishing of CPI-IW data currently, it may be
noted that the three (3) month period for which CPI-IW data will be
considered for review of indexation will not correspond to the three (3)
months of that Financial Quarter. However, on account of the review being
undertaken every quarter, CPI-IW data for almost all months will eventually
get considered. Such revision will be applicable prospectively and no
adjustments will be made for the past period.
To illustrate, Airfare Cap for the Financial Quarter from 1
st
April to 30
th
June will be announced on 1
st
March. CPI-IW data, exchange rate data, and
ATF data to be considered for reviewing indexation of Airfare Cap will be
the CPI-IW, exchange rate, and ATF data for the months of November,
December and January.
2.3.9 Indexation of Airfare Cap(s) and Maximum Airfare(s) will be based on the
formula provided at Annexure 4.
2.3.10 Airfare Cap(s) and Maximum Airfare(s) shall not include charges for
optional/unbundled services as listed by DGCA
2
from time to time.
2.4 Aircraft Categories
2.4.1 Different fixed wing aircraft (including seaplanes), based on their seating
capacity, have been classified into the following four (4) categories for the
purpose of this Scheme,
S.No.
Category
1.
Category-1A
2.
Category-1
3.
Category-2
4.
Category-3
2.5 VGF Cap
2.5.1 The MoCA acknowledges that different / same aircraft operated by different
operators for the same stage lengths can have different cost of operations on
account of differences in inherent economics of aircraft types for stage
2
http://dgca.nic.in/circular/ATC2_2015.pdf
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
327
22
lengths, cost of operations specific to operators in terms of various business
parameters such as business models, fleet utilization, scale of operations, etc.
Specification of (normative) VGF Caps upfront has therefore been
considered important to ensure transparent operation of a market based
mechanism under this Scheme rather than through determination subsequent
to receipt of varied proposals.
2.5.2 Specifying VGF Caps that satisfy all players would inevitably end up being
high and therefore uneconomical from the perspective of Scheme outcome.
Accordingly, VGF Caps have been specified with reference to a broad
representative data set / typical cost of operations and estimated revenue
potential for operations on a typical RCS Route for a particular stage length.
2.5.3 VGF to be provided for each RCS Seat under the Scheme will be capped for
different stage lengths for fixed wing aircraft (including seaplanes) and
different flight duration for helicopters operation.
2.5.4 The applicable VGF caps for operations through Category-1A, Category-1,
Category-2 and Category-3 fixed wing aircraft for a particular stage length
(“VGF Cap”), and VGF Cap for helicopter operation for different flight
duration, have been specified at Annexure - 3 to this Scheme. As mentioned
in Section 1.4.1.19e), for operations through a Category-1 and Category-1A
fixed wing aircraft (including seaplanes), the stage length for an RCS Route
shall be limited to 500 km and for operations through a Category-2 and
Category-3 fixed wing aircraft (including seaplanes), the stage length for an
RCS Route shall be limited to 600 km.
2.5.5 Airline operators must refer to VGF Cap(s) before submitting proposals, as
support requirement in excess of such cap for a particular stage length will
not be considered under the Scheme. Any proposal not complying with this
aspect will be disqualified.
2.5.6 As mentioned earlier, VGF is proposed to be provided for a limited period to
facilitate / stimulate regional air connectivity to un-served / under-served
areas such that the connectivity established is not dependent on VGF in
perpetuity.
2.5.7 It is expected that competition between players and differences in
expectations on business parameters like airfares on Non-RCS Seats, load
factors, etc. could lead to variations in proposals by different players. While,
it is the intent and focus of the Scheme that operation of a market based
mechanism facilitates discovery of the optimum VGF requirements within
specified VGF Caps, MoCA recognizes that in certain cases it is possible
that a market based discovery of optimum VGF requirements may not
happen due to lack of competition / uncertainty in market conditions and ex-
post, the specified (normative) VGF Caps may end up seeming to be higher
than the actual VGF requirement in future on account of factors like higher
airfares for Non-RCS Seats, higher load factors etc. Given that the focus of
the Scheme is to provide air connectivity where it does not exist, the
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
328
23
quantum or probability of such eventualities / outcomes in future cannot be
ascertained by MoCA and potentially even the market ex-ante on account of
the multiplicity of unascertainable factors. Further, the Scheme is premised
on and continuing to encourage an open market mechanism where operators
will be assessing demand on routes, developing networks through
deployment of appropriate capacities & technologies, and take risks on
account of factors like marketing of capacities, realizable demand, effect of
ATF prices on costs / fares for Non-RCS Seats, etc. Accordingly, in
consultation with stakeholders, MoCA recognizes that the risks retained with
the operators have to be seen in their entirety
2.5.8 MoCA also recognizes that Selected Airline Operators may sometimes
choose to sell tickets for Non-RCS Seats at prices below the Airfare Caps
applicable for RCS Seats on account of a number of business considerations
like marketing / promotion of a route, responding to demand in certain lean
periods of the year, as a strategy to recover a small proportion of fixed costs
(as opposed to operating idle capacity), etc. Provision of VGF may facilitate
/ promote such outturns, and in such a scenario, the VGF amount for
specified number of RCS Seats shall be deemed to have been applied or
distributed over all such passenger seats (including non-RCS Seats) for
which airfares were at or below the Airfare Caps.
2.5.9 Moreover, as per NCAP 2016 and considering various factors that impact
the cost of operations of an airline, the VGF Caps as well as approved VGF
amounts payable to the Selected Airline Operator(s), determined for specific
stage lengths / RCS Routes will be indexed to inflation, ATF prices and
exchange rate of INR vis-à-vis United States Dollar to offset changes in
uncontrollable cost of operations of players in future. Such revision will be
applicable prospectively and no adjustments will be made for the past
period.
2.5.10 The indexation of VGF to inflation, ATF prices and exchange rate of INR
vis-à-vis United States Dollar will be based on the formula specified in
Annexure 5: VGF Cap Indexation Formula and determined for every
Financial Quarter. The proportions in the formula have been determined
with reference to a broad representative data set / typical cost of operations
for airline operators.
2.5.11 The VGF Caps specified for various stage lengths / flight duration in this
Scheme as well as approved VGF amounts payable to the Selected Airline
Operator(s), as may be indexed pursuant to provisions herein, would be
considered inclusive of applicable GST, provided that the GST component
on VGF amounts paid to the Selected Airline Operator, if any, will be
reimbursed to the Selected Airline Operator at actuals from the RCF, upon
submission of appropriate evidence of payment of such GST
3
.
3
The airlines may have reference to the latest version of Notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28
th
June 2017 for
applicability of GST on VGF
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
329
24
2.6 RCF Allocation
2.6.1 Regions-wise allocation of RCF
2.6.1.1 It is proposed that RCF allocation to regions will be made in a
manner that promotes balanced growth / regional connectivity in
different parts of the country in line with the objective and
provisions of NCAP 2016.
2.6.1.2 Accordingly, to have an equitable distribution of RCF and
enhanced air connectivity across the country, the country will be
divided into five (5) regions based on Flight Information Regions
(Regions) as currently defined by the DGCA.
2.6.1.3 From the date of notification of the Scheme, proposals in a
particular Region can be approved such that up to 30% of the
estimated annual inflows in the RCF can be committed to such
proposals. MoCA may consider revising such limit from time to
time as may be required.
2.6.1.4 Where a particular RCS Route connects airports / Water
Aerodromes / Helipads in two (2) different Regions, the VGF for
such RCS Route will be divided equally between the two (2)
Regions for the purpose of the above determination.
2.6.2 RCF Allocation for Underserved Airports
2.6.2.1 To promote connectivity to Unserved Airports, proposals
connecting Underserved Airports will be approved such that only
up to 30% of the estimated annual inflows in the RCF can be
committed to such proposals. For the purpose of the above
determination, a proposal for an RCS Route connecting an
Unserved Airport to an Underserved Airport shall be considered as
a proposal connecting Unserved Airports, and a proposal for an
RCS Route connecting an Underserved Airport to another
Underserved Airport or any other airport, which is not an
Unserved Airport, shall be considered as a proposal connecting
Underserved Airports.
2.6.2.2 MoCA may consider revising such limit from time to time as may
be required based on the assessment undertaken by MoCA /
Implementing Agency.
2.6.3 RCF Allocation Cap for Airline operators
2.6.3.1 To limit large systemic exposure to any single airline operator, the
total VGF approved for a particular airline operator under the
Scheme will be capped to an annual limit.
2.6.3.2 Accordingly, the total VGF approved for a particular airline
operator under the Scheme will be capped to an annual limit
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
330
25
corresponding to 30% of the estimated annual inflows in the RCF,
provided further that the VGF approved to such airline operator in
any given Region does not exceed 50% of the allocation cap for
such Region (refer Section 2.6.1.3 above). MoCA may consider
revising such limit from time to time as may be required based on
the assessment undertaken by MoCA / Implementing Agency.
2.6.4 RCF Allocation Cap for helicopter and sea plane operations
2.6.4.1 In order to encourage operations through helicopters and sea plane
under the Scheme, up to 10% of the estimated annual inflows in the
RCF shall be earmarked for operations through helicopters and up
to 5% of the estimated annual inflows in the RCF shall be
earmarked for operations through seaplanes. MoCA may consider
revising such limit from time to time as may be required based on
the assessment undertaken by MoCA / Implementing Agency
2.7 ASKMs on RCS Flights
2.7.1 The Selected Airline Operators shall be permitted to set-off / trade their
Available Seat Kilometers (ASKMs) generated on Non-RCS Seats under
RDG guidelines as per the existing DGCA rules. For avoidance of doubt,
Available Seat Kilometers (ASKMs) generated on RCS Seats will not be
allowed for set-off / trading under RDG guidelines.
2.8 Exclusivity of operations
2.8.1 As mentioned earlier, sustainability of operations is one of the key guiding
principles for RCS. The MoCA recognizes that traffic demand on RCS
Route(s) will be uncertain, and with most of such routes being untested/non-
operational, the market risk for Selected Airline Operator(s) could be
significant. Such market risk would tend to be accentuated on account of
possible competition from other airline operators especially in the early
stages of route development. Such competition in the early stages of
development of such routes, especially given the demand uncertainty, could
ultimately impact achievement of Scheme objectives.
2.8.2 Accordingly, to encourage development of such routes by airline operators,
Selected Airline Operators shall, subject to Section 3.13, be granted
exclusivity for operating air transport services / flights on an RCS Route
(hereinafter referred to as Exclusivity Period”) under the Scheme. Such
Exclusivity Period shall commence from the date of the Letter of Award and
end on the earliest to occur of: (a) the expiry or lapse of the time period
(including any extension thereof) specified in the Letter of Award for
execution of the Selected Airline Operator Agreement and such agreement
not having been executed by the Selected Airline Operator within the
specified or extended period, (b) expiry of three (3) years from the date of
commencement of RCS Flight operations on any RCS Route forming part of
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
331
26
an Individual Route Proposal or a Network Proposal, and (c) termination of
the relevant Selected Airline Operator Agreement.
Provided that such exclusivity shall not be available for air transport services
/ flights on State RCS Routes and Lakshadweep Specific Route.
2.8.3 The exclusivity of operations shall be granted to a Selected Airline Operator
only for the specific RCS Route as part of Individual Route Proposal or a
Network Proposal for which the bidding has been undertaken and such
operator has been identified as the Selected Airline Operator. For instance, if
an airline operator has been designated as the Selected Airline Operator for
an RCS Route connecting point A to point B and another RCS Route
connecting point B to point C, the exclusivity of operations shall be granted
to such Selected Airline Operator only on RCS Routes A-B and B-C and not
for a direct (non-stop) route connecting point A to point C.
2.8.4 During such Exclusivity Period, if any other airline operator(s) intends to
operate flights on an RCS Route forming part of Individual Route Proposal
or a Network Proposal, it shall be required to obtain a No Objection
Certificate (NOC) from the Selected Airline Operator,
Provided that, such NOC shall only be issued after a period of 180 days from
the date of commencement of RCS Flight operations on any RCS Route by
the Selected Airline Operator and shall be subject to no default in
performance of obligations of the Selected Airline Operator subsisting under
the respective Selected Airline Operator Agreement;
Provided further that such NOC shall only be valid as long as the Selected
Airline Operator Agreement is valid and subsisting for such RCS Route. The
Selected Airline Operator shall be required to incorporate such condition as
part of the NOC being issued.
Provided further that such airline operator(s), which have obtained a NOC
from the Selected Airline Operator for an RCS Route, shall not be provided
any benefits or concessions under the Scheme on such RCS Route.
2.8.5 Subsequent to completion of the Exclusivity Period, any airline operator
may operate flights on that route subject to the prevailing applicable law,
including but not limited to civil aviation rules and regulations.
2.9 Miscellaneous
2.9.1 MoCA has the authority to issue such directions from time to time, as may
be necessary for smooth implementation of the Scheme.
2.9.2 The details of bidding process shall be notified by the Implementing Agency
through Notice Inviting Proposal for Selection of Airline Operators under
Regional Connectivity Scheme from time to time.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
332
27
3 Operating Mechanism of the Scheme
3.1 Introduction
3.1.1 The Scheme envisages a market based mechanism for selection of an airline
operator to operate on an RCS Route or a network, wherein the Initial
Proposal and counter proposal(s) will be evaluated as per the mechanism
presented herein. Pursuant to such evaluation of proposals, a Selected
Airline Operator will be identified and the Implementing Agency will enter
into a three (3) year agreement with the Selected Airline Operator for
operations on the RCS Route (“Selected Airline Operator Agreement”).
3.2 Eligibility Criteria for Proposals
3.2.1 In order to be eligible for support under this Scheme:
3.2.1.1 A proposal shall either be for an individual RCS Route (“Individual
Route Proposal”) or for a set of connected routes (“Network
Proposal”);
3.2.1.2 Operations under the Scheme will be permitted through fixed wing
aircraft (including seaplanes), and helicopters
provided that operations through Category 1A aircraft (other than
seaplanes) will be permitted only on Priority RCS Routes, NER
Routes, State RCS Routes providing connectivity to Priority
Area(s) and routes connecting airports specified in Annexure - 1D;
provided further that operations through helicopters will be
permitted in the Priority Areas only and operations through
seaplanes will be permitted only if there is at least one (1) Water
Aerodrome as origin or destination for every route proposed in the
Individual Route Proposal or Network Proposal.
3.2.1.3 Bidding under the Scheme shall be permitted only by the airline
operators having:
1) A valid Scheduled Operator’s Permit (SOP) or a Scheduled
Commuter Operator (SCO) permit for scheduled air transport
service (passenger) issued by the DGCA, or
2) A valid Non-Scheduled Operator’s Permit (NSOP) for non-
scheduled air transport service (passenger) issued by the
DGCA, or
3) A valid air operator permit or equivalent permit issued by the
competent civil aviation regulatory authority of any foreign
country, or
4) Entities which do not have a valid AOP at the time of bidding
under the Scheme, but which have applied for an initial No
Objection Certificate (NOC) from MoCA, as per applicable
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
333
28
regulations, for obtaining Air Operator Certificate (AOC) for
Scheduled Passenger Air Transport Service or Scheduled
Commuter Air Transport Services before the last date of
Submission of Initial Proposals of the respective bidding
cycle.
3.2.1.4 Entities who have been designated as Selected Airline Operators
(SAO) and awarded RCS Routes by the Implementing Agency
pursuant to bidding undertaken in previous round of RCS, and have
not completed their commitments under the Selected Airline
Operator Agreements, as determined by the Implementing Agency
from time to time at its own discretion, will not be eligible for the
bidding.
3.2.1.5 In the event that any of the Applicant eligible under Section
3.2.1.3.2), 3.2.1.3.3), and 3.2.1.3.4) above is identified as the
Selected Airline Operator, such Applicant must obtain a valid AOC
for Scheduled Passenger Air Transport Service or Scheduled
Commuter Air Transport Services from DGCA before
commencement of operations under RCS. Provided that, for
operations through sea planes and helicopters at an unlicensed
Water Aerodrome(s) or Helipad(s), the SAO shall be permitted to
commence operations under RCS through a valid NSOP as an
interim measure till such Water Aerodrome(s) or Helipad(s) is
licensed. The Selected Airline Operator shall be required to obtain
a valid SCO / SOP permit during such interim period. MoCA may
examine, from time to time, the abovementioned eligibility
conditions and may issue appropriate guidelines /
directions/clarifications in this regard.
3.2.1.6 The Selected Airline Operator shall be obligated to commence
RCS Flight operations on an RCS Route, as part of Individual
Route Proposal or a Network Proposal within a period of 180 days
from the issuance of Letter of Award for such Individual Route
Proposal or a Network Proposal unless any extension is granted by
the Implementing Agency. Provided that, RCS Flight operations on
an RCS Route as part of Individual Route Proposal or a Network
Proposal, as listed in Annexure 8, shall need to commence on 1
st
April 2020, unless any extension is granted by the Implementing
Agency.
3.2.1.7 Failure by a Selected Airline Operator (SAO) to commence flights
within six (6) months from the date of issuance of Letter of Award
(LOA) or any extension as granted by the Implementing Agency,
would be an event of default which entitles the Implementing
Agency to terminate the Selected Airline Operator Agreement
(SAOA). In such an event, the Implementing Agency may consider
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
334
29
identifying Selected Airline Operator(s) for such routes through a
separate process, which shall be notified later by MoCA.
3.2.1.8 DGCA may also examine, from time to time, permitting operations
under the Scheme using foreign registered aircraft and may issue
appropriate guidelines / directions in this regard.
3.2.2 In the event that an RCS Route is proposed for bidding under the Scheme
such that it satisfies the condition as provided in Section 1.4.1.19 b) on the
Scheme release date (Scheme Version 4.0) in which an application is made
and subsequently at any stage during the bidding process, up to the date of
signing of the Selected Airline Operator Agreement, an airline / seaplane /
helicopter operator commences operation on such route without availing any
support/concession under the Scheme, such route shall not be considered for
award under the RCS.
3.3 Minimum Performance Specifications for an RCS Flight
3.3.1 Under the Scheme, a Selected Airline Operator will be required to meet the
following Minimum Performance Specifications with respect to its RCS
Flight operations.
3.3.1.1 For Category-1A aircraft (including seaplanes), a Selected Airline
Operator shall be required to provide hundred percent (100%) of
RCS Flight Capacity as RCS Seats such that the Selected Airline
Operator provides at least twenty-seven (27) RCS Seats per week.
3.3.1.2 For Category 1, Category 2 and Category 3 fixed wing aircraft
(including seaplanes), a Selected Airline Operator shall be required
to provide fifty percent (50%) of RCS Flight Capacity as RCS
Seats,
provided that where fifty percent (50%) of RCS Flight Capacity
exceeds forty (40) passenger seats, the RCS Seats shall be capped
at forty (40) passenger seats,
provided further that where fifty percent (50%) of RCS Flight
Capacity is less than nine (9) passenger seats, the minimum
number of RCS Seats shall not be less than nine (9). For avoidance
of doubt, an airline operator can operate an RCS Flight with a fixed
wing aircraft with 9 passenger seats only when all passenger seats
of the aircraft are proposed as RCS Seats;
3.3.1.3 For helicopters with a passenger seating capacity of less than or
equal to 13 seats, a Selected Airline Operator shall be required to
provide hundred percent (100%) of RCS Flight Capacity as RCS
Seats.
3.3.1.4 For helicopters with a passenger seating capacity of more than 13
seats, the number of RCS Seats in an RCS Flight shall be capped at
thirteen (13) passenger seats
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
335
30
3.3.2 In addition to the above, a Selected Airline Operator will be required to meet
the following Minimum Performance Specifications with respect to the
number of RCS Flight operations per week.
3.3.2.1 For RCS Routes providing connectivity to Priority Area(s), the
number of RCS Flights to be operated in a week with VGF shall be
a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of fourteen (14) departures
per week from the same RCS Concession Airport such that the
RCS Flights are operated on at least three (3) days of the week.
3.3.2.2 For RCS Routes providing connectivity to other than Priority
Area(s), the number of RCS Flights to be operated in a week with
VGF shall be a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of seven (7)
departures per week from the same RCS Concession Airport such
that the RCS Flights are operated on at least three (3) days of the
week.
3.3.3 An Applicant may submit an Initial Proposal for either one-way connectivity
(a route) or to-and-fro connectivity (two routes) between two airports /
Water Aerodromes / Helipads.
By way of an illustration, an RCS Flight operating from point A (say an RCS
Concession Airport) to point B and returning to point A (to and fro
operation) shall be considered as one departure from an RCS Concession
Airport but two routes for the purpose of VGF provision such that for both
the routes (i.e. from point A to point B and from point B to point A), the
Selected Airline Operator shall be required to satisfy the conditions
provided in Section 3.3.1 and be eligible for payment of corresponding VGF.
3.4 Submission of Initial Proposals
3.4.1 An airline / seaplane / helicopter operator (hereinafter called an “Applicant”)
can submit proposals satisfying the eligibility conditions and minimum
performance specifications provided in Section 3.2 and Section 3.3
respectively (“Initial Proposal”) to the Implementing Agency in the form
and manner specified in Section 3.6 hereto and would need to have reference
to specified Airfare Caps and VGF Caps.
3.4.2 Upon notification of the Scheme by MoCA, prospective Applicant(s) can
submit Initial Proposals as per the timelines indicated by the Implementing
Agency from time to time.
3.4.3 Applicants are advised to undertake their own due diligence including
assessment of pay load restrictions at various airports / Water Aerodromes /
Helipads, market assessment, investigations and analyses including the
suitability of the airports / Water Aerodromes / Helipads for RCS Flight
operations being proposed by them and would bear full responsibility for the
accuracy, adequacy, correctness, reliability and completeness of the
assumptions, data & information considered by them. The MoCA,
Implementing Agency, concerned State Governments, concerned airport /
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
336
31
Water Aerodrome / Helipad operators, or any other agency supporting any
of these entities shall not bear any responsibility for any inaccuracy or lack
of data / information for the proposed RCS Flight operations by the
Applicants.
3.4.4 Applicants alone shall bear all costs associated with or relating to the
preparation and submission of their proposals or any other costs incurred in
connection with or relating to their proposals. All such costs and expenses
will remain with the Applicants and the MoCA and/or the Implementing
Agency or any other agency shall not be liable in any manner whatsoever to
bear or reimburse any costs or other expenses incurred by the Applicants in
preparation or submission of proposals, regardless of the conduct or outcome
of the selection process specified under the Scheme.
3.4.5 Initial Proposals received till the respective specified deadlines shall be
considered by the Implementing Agency for proceeding with further steps.
3.4.6 After receiving Initial Proposal(s), the Implementing Agency with reference
to the mechanism specified in Section 3.8, shall release RCS Route(s) as part
of Initial Proposals, and will invite counter proposals from other airline
operators against such Initial Proposal(s) (“Counter Proposals”) with
reference to a prioritization framework specified in Section 3.17.
3.5 Network Proposal
3.5.1 An Applicant may submit an Initial Proposal which is a Network Proposal
wherein it proposes to connect a minimum of three (3) and up to a maximum
of seven (7) distinct airports / Water Aerodromes / Helipads in a single day,
through a network, as part of the same proposal.
3.5.2 A Network Proposal shall have multiple routes and can be a combination of
RCS Routes and Non-RCS Routes such that there are at least two RCS
Routes connecting distinct set of airports / Water Aerodromes / Helipads.
Provided that, a Network Proposal proposed to be connected using Category
1A, except for Category 1A seaplanes, shall only be permitted if all RCS
Routes as part of such Network Proposal provide connectivity to Priority
Area(s).
By way of an illustration, a proposal with A-B-C and A-B-C-A routes where,
A-B and B-C are two RCS Routes connecting distinct set of airports (A,B
and C) and C-A is a Non-RCS Route, shall be considered as Network
Proposals. However, a proposal with A-B-A-C routes where A-B and B-A
are RCS Routes and A-C is a Non-RCS Route shall not be considered as a
Network Proposal.
3.5.3 The Applicants shall be required to ensure that all RCS Routes in a Network
Proposal are connected using the same aircraft type through the same
number of flights per week.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
337
32
3.5.4 In case of a Network Proposal, all benefits and conditions under the Scheme
such as VGF support, exclusivity of operations, Airfare Cap etc. shall be
applicable only on the RCS Routes forming part of the Network Proposal.
3.5.5 For further clarity, a Selected Airline Operator for a particular Network
Proposal will not get any exclusivity of operations or VGF support or other
benefits for the Non-RCS Route(s) proposed in its network and its
operations on such Non-RCS Routes will not be subject to any Airfare Caps.
The Airfare Cap for every RCS Route in a Network Proposal shall be based
on the respective stage length / flight duration of such RCS Route and
Airfare Caps specified under this Scheme. Further VGF per RCS Seat for
each RCS Route in a Network Proposal shall be based on the respective
stage length / flight duration of such RCS Route & corresponding VGF Caps
specified under this Scheme for a particular aircraft category and the VGF
per RCS Seat bid / quoted by the Selected Airline Operator.
3.5.6 After receiving the Initial Proposal(s), the Implementing Agency with
reference to the mechanism specified in Section 3.8, shall release RCS
Route(s) to be connected as part of a Network Proposal, for inviting Counter
Proposals.
3.6 Proposal submission requirements
3.6.1 As part of the proposal submission, an Applicant shall be required to submit
information under following categories, as may be specified in detail from
time to time:
3.6.1.1 Information about the Applicant
3.6.1.2 Technical Proposal
3.6.1.3 Financial Proposal
3.6.2 Applicant Information - An Applicant shall provide the following
information:
3.6.2.1 Registered name of the Applicant
3.6.2.2 Name of the airline
3.6.2.3 Date of incorporation
3.6.2.4 Certificate of incorporation
3.6.2.5 Copy of a valid Scheduled Operator’s Permit or Scheduled
Commuter Operator Permit or Non Scheduled Operator’s Permit,
as the case may be, issued by the DGCA or equivalent permit
issued by the competent civil aviation regulatory authority of any
foreign country or a copy of initial No Objection Certificate (NOC)
from MoCA for obtaining Air Operator Certificate (AOC) for
Scheduled Passenger Air Transport Service or Scheduled
Commuter Air Transport Services.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
338
33
3.6.3 Technical Proposal - As part of the technical proposal, an Applicant shall
submit the following information about a proposed RCS Route:
3.6.3.1 Proposal Security as indicated by the Implementing Agency from
time to time
3.6.3.2 Proposed RCS Route on which the Applicant would want to
operate i.e. the origin and destination airports / Water Aerodrome
proposed to be connected through the RCS Route. In case of
operations through helicopters, the Applicant shall submit the
coordinates of Helipads proposed to be connected, if not listed in
GSR 751E
3.6.3.3 Proposed aircraft / seaplane category / helicopter type to be
deployed on the RCS route.
3.6.3.4 Seating capacity of the proposed aircraft/ seaplane/ helicopter
3.6.3.5 RCS Flight Capacity proposed to be deployed on the RCS Route
with breakdown of number of RCS Seats per RCS Flight and
number of Non-RCS Seats per RCS Flight
3.6.3.6 Number of RCS Flights per week.
3.6.4 The stage length / flight duration for a particular RCS Route shall be based
on the determination undertaken by the Airports Authority of India.
3.6.5 In case of a Network Proposal, the Applicant shall submit the above
information for each of the proposed RCS Routes in the Network Proposal
along with the proposed network path.
Additional information requirement for Initial Proposals with no VGF
requirement
3.6.6 In the event that an Applicant does not require any VGF support under the
Scheme for undertaking RCS Flight operations as part of its Individual
Route Proposal or Network Proposal (i.e. for all RCS Routes proposed under
the network), such an Applicant will be required to mention the same as part
of its Technical Proposal.
For avoidance of doubt, the Technical Proposal as part of an Initial Proposal
would otherwise not be required to share any details on the VGF amount
requested (which is to be submitted as part of the Financial Proposal). Only
in cases where there is no VGF requirement, the same should be mentioned
as part of the Technical Proposal by the Applicant.
Financial Proposal Information
3.6.7 As part of the Financial Proposal when VGF is sought, the Applicant shall
submit the following information.
3.6.7.1 VGF per RCS Seat sought under the Scheme for RCS Flight;
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
339
34
3.6.7.2 Maximum airfare pursuant to Section 2.3 for an RCS Seat that the
operator, if selected under RCS, will charge for RCS Seats on an
RCS Flight (“Maximum Airfare”).
3.6.8 As part of the Financial Proposal when no VGF is sought, the Applicant
shall submit the following information.
3.6.8.1 Maximum airfare pursuant to Section 2.3 for an RCS Seat that the
operator, if selected under RCS, will charge for RCS Seats on an
RCS Flight (“Maximum Airfare”);
such that in Section 3.6.7 and Section 3.6.8, the VGF per RCS Seat
or maximum airfare proposed by an Applicant is not more than the
VGF Cap and the Airfare Cap respectively, as indicated in the
Scheme for the applicable stage length / flight duration of the
proposed RCS Route.
3.6.9 In case of a Network Proposal, the Applicant shall submit the above
information for each of the proposed RCS Route(s) in the Network Proposal.
3.7 Identification of RCS Routes as part of Initial Proposal(s)
3.7.1 The Implementing Agency shall acknowledge or cause to acknowledge the
receipt of Initial Proposal(s) after the deadline for submission of Initial
Proposal(s).
3.7.2 The Implementing Agency shall identify the RCS Routes proposed as part of
an Individual Route Proposal or a Network Proposal. The technical details of
the Individual Route Proposal or the Network Proposal such as name of
applicant, aircraft type, RCS Flight Capacity, etc. shall not be opened at this
stage.
3.7.3 The Implementing Agency shall finalize and declare the list of RCS Route(s)
as part of Individual Route Proposal(s) or Network Proposal(s) against
which Counter Proposals shall be invited. Such assessment shall be based on
various parameters such as the availability of funds, readiness of the airport,
priority of routes etc. Decision of the Implementing Agency in this regard
shall be final and binding on all parties. At the time of inviting Counter
Proposals, the Implementing Agency shall consider an airport / Water
Aerodrome / Helipad proposed as part of Initial Proposal as RCS Concession
Airport even if the respective State Government has not extended the
concessions required under the Scheme, provided such airport / Water
Aerodrome / Helipad satisfies all other requirements under the Scheme to be
qualified as a RCS Concession Airport. Based on the Initial Proposal, MoCA
shall approach the respective State Government for providing
benefits/concessions specified under the Scheme. In the event that the
respective State Government does not notify the benefits/concessions
specified under the Scheme, the proposed RCS Route shall not be
considered for further stages of bidding process.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
340
35
3.8 Selection of proposals for counter bidding
3.8.1 Individual Route Proposals
3.8.1.1 All Individual Route Proposals, identified in Section 3.7, shall be
put up for inviting Counter Proposals along with the details
mentioned in Section 3.8.3 below.
3.8.2 Network Proposals
3.8.2.1 MoCA notes that there can be instances, where in a particular
bidding cycle, the Initial Proposals pertaining to Network
Proposals are received such that:
1) Only one Network Proposal is received for a particular set
and sequence of RCS Routes such that there is no overlap of
any of the RCS Routes with any other Initial Proposal.
2) More than one Network Proposals are received having
exactly the same set and sequence of RCS Routes in their
networks and there is no partial overlap of RCS Routes with
any other Initial Proposal. Such Network Proposals shall be
considered identical (“Identical Networks”) and such set and
sequence of RCS Routes shall be bid out as one network.
3) More than one Network Proposals are received which have
one or more but not all common RCS Route(s). Such
Network proposals shall be considered non-identical (Non-
Identical Networks”) and all such networks shall be bid out as
separate proposals.
3.8.2.2 As mentioned in Section 3.5, a Network Proposal may be a
combination of both RCS Routes as well as Non-RCS Routes. For
the purpose of inviting Counter Proposals, the Implementing
Agency shall only consider the RCS Routes proposed to be
connected as part of the network and their proposed sequence /
network path. The Non-RCS Route(s) in a Network Proposal shall
not be considered by the Implementing Agency for the purpose of
bidding. A Counter Proposal to such Network Proposal shall have
the same RCS Routes for its network as are there in the Initial
Proposal and published by the Implementing Agency. However,
there shall be no restriction on the Non-RCS Routes as part of such
Counter Proposal.
By way of an illustration, for a network proposed as A-B-C-D-E
(where A,B,C,D and E are airports), having B-C and C-D as Non-
RCS Routes and A-B and D-E as RCS Routes, the Implementing
Agency will consider the RCS Routes A-B and D-E for the purpose
of inviting Counter Proposals and publish the same. The counter-
bids to such Network Proposal shall have only A-B and D-E as
RCS Routes in the network, but will be allowed to have any set and
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
341
36
sequence of Non-RCS Routes. For instance, a bidder can submit a
Counter Proposal as a network of A-B-F-G-D-E, where B-F, F-G
and G-D are Non-RCS Routes. Provided that, once A-B-F-G-D-E
is proposed as the network, the conditions of aircraft type and
number of RCS Flights per week as provided in Section 3.5 shall
apply only to the RCS Routes i.e. (A-B & D-E).
3.8.3 In publishing the list of Individual Route Proposals / Network Proposals for
which Counter Proposals would be invited, the Implementing Agency will
publish details such as the following:
Sl.
No.
Individual
Route /
Network
Details
VGF
Requeste
d
Applic
able
Airfare
Caps
Applicabl
e VGF
Caps
Stage length (in
km) / flight duration
(in mins) of flying
path declared by
AAI.
1
Individual
Route
RCS Route
A - B
Yes / No
2
Network
RCS Routes
in the
following
sequence A
B, C D
and so on..
Yes / No
….
3.9 Invitation of Counter Proposals
3.9.1 The procedure defined in Section 3.8, shall be followed for selecting Initial
Proposals for inviting Counter Proposals. No changes shall be proposed to
the routes offered as part of the Initial Proposal.
3.9.2 From the date of release of invitation for Counter Proposals, the
Implementing Agency will provide a defined period (to be specified
separately) to all other interested airline operators to submit Counter
Proposals against an Initial Proposal provided that after receiving Initial
Proposal(s), the Implementing Agency may, for administrative exigencies,
provide a separate schedule for invitation of Counter Proposals.
3.9.3 All Counter Proposals shall include information as required under Section
3.6 and shall be subject to the Minimum Performance Specifications as
specified in Section 3.3.
3.9.4 VGF Cap and Airfare Cap to be considered for submission of Counter
Proposals should be the same as that applicable during the Financial Quarter
in which the Initial Proposal was submitted.
3.9.5 For inviting Counter Proposals against a Network Proposal received as an
Initial Proposal, the Implementing Agency shall only release the set and
sequence of RCS Routes proposed as part of the Initial Proposal, as
mentioned in Section 3.8.3 and Applicants shall be required to submit their
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
342
37
Counter Proposals for such network of RCS Routes subject to the following
conditions:
3.9.5.1 Any Counter Proposal (Network Proposal) shall not be allowed to
add/ delete/ propose any new RCS Route(s) other than the RCS
Route(s) proposed as part of the Initial Proposal and released by
the Implementing Agency;
3.9.5.2 Any Counter Proposal (Network Proposal) must connect exactly
the same set of RCS Routes in the same sequence proposed as part
of the Initial Proposal and released by the Implementing Agency
and shall satisfy conditions mentioned under Section 3.5.
3.10 Evaluation of proposals and Applicant selection
3.10.1 After the receipt of Counter Proposal(s) against the Initial Proposals, the
Implementing Agency shall undertake assessment of information mentioned
under Section 3.6.2 and Section 3.6.3 in terms of compliance with Section
3.2 and Section 3.3 and other conditions specified herein for both Initial
Proposals as well as Counter Proposals and advise the Applicant(s) whether
the proposal is complete or incomplete. The Financial Proposals as part of
the Initial Proposal(s) or the Counter Proposal(s) shall not be opened at this
stage. For the purpose of smooth implementation of the Scheme, the
Implementing Agency may from time to time, issue such directions as may
be necessary in consultation with MoCA.
3.10.2 In an event the information provided by the Applicant(s) is incomplete, the
Implementing Agency may seek clarifications from the Applicant(s)
indicating the incorrect / missing information. In an event any of the Initial
Proposal is found to be invalid at this stage, the Implementing Agency shall
not consider such Initial Proposal as well as Counter Proposal(s), if any,
against such Initial Proposal for further stages of bidding process. The
decision of the Implementing Agency in this regard shall be final and
binding on all parties.
3.10.3 In the event that there is no Counter Proposal against a valid Initial Proposal,
the Implementing Agency shall open the Financial Proposal submitted as
part of the Initial Proposal.
3.10.3.1 In such an event, if the Financial Proposal of an Applicant satisfies
the conditions as specified in Section 3.6.7 and Section 3.6.8, the
Applicant who has submitted the Initial Proposal shall be identified
as the Selected Airline Operator”. In case of more than one Initial
Proposal for the same RCS Route, the procedure specified in
Section 3.11 shall be followed to evaluate such Initial Proposals.
3.10.3.2 In case of a Network Proposal, the conditions as specified in
Section 3.5.5 shall need to be satisfied for each of the RCS Routes
in the Network.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
343
38
3.10.4 In the event, the Implementing Agency receives one or more than one
Counter Proposals against an Initial Proposal, the Implementing Agency
shall, for all eligible Counter Proposals and the corresponding Initial
Proposal, undertake opening of the Financial Proposal at a pre-specified date
in the presence of Applicants who choose to be present, and for all Financial
Proposal(s) that satisfy the conditions as specified in Section 3.6.7 and
Section 3.6.8 or Section 3.5.5 as may be applicable, the preferred applicant
shall be determined based on the mechanism specified in Section 3.11 and
Section 3.12.
3.11 Evaluation of Financial Proposal for an Individual Route
Proposal
3.11.1 For Initial Proposals where the Applicant(s) have not requested any VGF as
part of the bid, the evaluation of a Counter Proposal vis-à-vis the Initial
Proposal shall be done on the basis of number of RCS Seats per week quoted
by the Applicants. The Applicant quoting the maximum number of RCS
Seats per week shall be declared as the “Preferred Individual Route
Applicant”.
3.11.1.1 In the event that two or more Applicants are determined as the
Preferred Individual Route Applicants, (the Tied Preferred
Route Applicants”), the evaluation of Tied Preferred Route
Applicants shall be done on the basis of lowest Maximum Airfare
for each RCS Seat to be quoted by the Applicants. The Applicant
quoting the lowest Maximum Airfare for each RCS Seat shall be
declared as the Preferred Individual Route Applicant”.
3.11.1.2 In the event that such Tied Preferred Route Applicants have quoted
the same Maximum Airfare, the Implementing Agency shall
specify a separate procedure for breaking the tie at that stage.
3.11.2 For Initial Proposals, where the Applicant(s) have requested VGF, the
evaluation will be done on the basis of VGF per RCS Seat (“hereinafter
referred to as Bidding Parameter”) such that the Applicant who has quoted
the lowest VGF per RCS Seat for the proposed RCS Route shall be selected
as the “Preferred Individual Route Applicant” for such RCS Route.
3.11.2.1 In the event that two or more Applicants are determined as the
Preferred Individual Route Applicants, (the Tied Preferred
Route Applicants”), identification of the Preferred Individual
Route Applicant will be as per the process mentioned in Section
3.11.1.1.
3.11.3 The Applicant submitting the Initial Proposal for a particular RCS Route
shall have the option of Right to Match as per Section 3.14. Provided that in
the event of Tied Preferred Route Applicants as explained above, the
Applicant who has submitted the Initial Proposal for a particular RCS Route
shall be given the Right to Match option through participation in the tie
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
344
39
breaker process if its proposal is within a range of 10% of the financial
proposal submitted by such Tied Preferred Route Applicants. During the tie-
breaker process, the Applicant which submits the best proposal at end of the
process, shall be identified as the Preferred Individual Route Applicant. For
avoidance of doubt, in the event of Tied Preferred Route Applicants, no
further RTM Option shall be available to the Applicant who has submitted
the Initial Proposal for a particular RCS Route after the commencement of
tie breaker process.
3.12 Evaluation of Financial Proposals for a Network Proposals
3.12.1 For Initial Proposals pertaining to Network Proposals where the Applicant(s)
(or at least one of the Applicant in case of Identical Networks) have not
requested any VGF as part of the bid, the evaluation of a Counter Proposal
vis-à-vis the Initial Proposal shall be done using the process specified in
Section 3.11.1 above based on the total number of RCS Seats per week
across all RCS Routes in the network or the lowest total of Maximum
Airfares for all RCS Routes as quoted by the Applicant, as the case may be.
The identified preferred applicant based on such process shall be declared as
the “Preferred Network Applicant”.
3.12.2 For Initial Proposals pertaining to Network Proposals satisfying the
conditions given in Section 3.8.2.1.1) and Section 3.8.2.1.2), where the
Applicant(s) have requested VGF, the evaluation of Counter Proposal(s) vis-
à-vis the initial Network Proposal shall be done on the basis of total of VGF
per RCS Seat for all RCS Routes proposed in the network such that the
Applicant who has quoted the lowest total of VGF per RCS Seat for all RCS
Routes proposed in the network shall be selected as the “Preferred Network
Applicant” for such Network Proposal.
3.12.2.1 In the event that two or more Applicants are determined as the
Preferred Network Applicants, (the Tied Preferred Network
Applicants”), identification of the Preferred Network Applicant
will be as per the process mentioned in Section 3.11.1.1.
3.12.2.2 The Applicant submitting the Initial Proposal pertaining to such
Network Proposal will have the option of Right to Match as per
Section 3.14. Provided that in the event of Tied Preferred Network
Applicants as explained above, the Applicant who has submitted
the Initial Proposal pertaining to such Network Proposal shall be
given the Right to Match option through participation in the tie
breaker process if its proposal is within a range of 10% of the
financial proposal submitted by such Tied Preferred Network
Applicants. During the tie-breaker process, the Applicant which
submits the best proposal at end of the process, shall be identified
as the Preferred Network Applicant. For avoidance of doubt, in the
event of Tied Preferred Network Applicants, no further RTM
Option shall be available to the Applicant who has submitted the
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
345
40
Initial Proposal pertaining to such Network Proposal after the
commencement of tie breaker process.
3.12.3 The total of VGF per RCS Seat for all RCS Routes proposed in the network
for an Applicant shall be calculated as:

Where:
m is the number of RCS Routes in the Network Proposal of the
Applicant
is the VGF per RCS Seat quoted by the Applicant for RCS Route i
3.13 Evaluation of Financial Proposals for Simultaneous Proposals
3.13.1 In case of Initial Proposals which are Non-Identical Proposals as defined in
Section 3.8.2.1.3) or where an RCS Route proposed as part of an Individual
Route Proposal is common with an RCS Route proposed as part of a
Network Proposal (such proposals being hereafter referred as “Simultaneous
Proposals”), the evaluation of financial proposals shall be undertaken in the
manner as specified below.
3.13.2 The Implementing Agency shall evaluate respective Counter Proposals vis-
à-vis the Initial Proposals for such Simultaneous Proposals as per the process
specified in Section 3.11 and Section 3.12 above and shall identify Preferred
Individual Route Applicant and Preferred Network Applicant for such
Simultaneous Proposals, as the case may be.
3.13.3 Subsequent to the identification of the Preferred Individual Route Applicant
(if any) and Preferred Network Applicant(s), their respective proposals shall
be compared to identify the Applicant(s) with lowest VGF per RCS Seat for
such common RCS Route(s).
3.13.4 In the event that a Preferred Individual Route Applicant (if any) has
submitted the lowest VGF per RCS Seat for a common RCS Route, all other
identified Preferred Network Applicant(s) shall be provided the opportunity
to match the lowest VGF per RCS Seat for such common RCS Route.
3.13.5 However, in the event that a Preferred Network Applicant has submitted the
lowest VGF per RCS Seat for a common RCS Route, only the other
identified Preferred Network Applicant(s) shall be provided the opportunity
to match the lowest VGF per RCS Seat for such common RCS Route. In
such an event, if there is a Preferred Individual Route Applicant for such
common RCS Route, its proposal shall not be considered further for award.
3.13.6 In case of 3.13.4, if Preferred Network Applicant(s) decides to match the
lowest VGF per RCS Seat of the Preferred Individual Route Applicant for a
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
346
41
common RCS Route, the proposal of Preferred Individual Route Applicant
shall not be considered further for award, and all the Preferred Network
Applicant(s) who chose to match the lowest VGF per RCS Seat would be
selected to operate such common RCS route(s). In case of 3.13.5, all
Preferred Network Applicant(s) who match the lowest VGF per RCS Seat
shall be selected for operating such common RCS Routes(s) and shall be
identified as the Selected Airline Operator for their respective Network
Proposal(s). Proposals of Applicants who decide not to match the VGF per
RCS Seat for such common RCS Routes(s) shall not be considered further
for award. For avoidance of doubt, all such Applicants who match the lowest
VGF per Seat for such common RCS Route shall have the right to undertake
operations on that common RCS Route and will be provided VGF on such
common RCS Route.
By way of an illustration, say the Implementing Agency receives Initial
Proposals (Simultaneous Proposals) for the following Individual Route
Proposal / Network Proposals: A-B, A-B-C-D and A-B-E-F, where all the
proposed routes are RCS Routes. The following steps will be undertaken by
the Implementing Agency for evaluation of such proposals:
Step 1 RCS Routes as part of all Initial Proposals shall be identified.
Step 2 - After identification of RCS Routes proposed under Initial Proposals,
Counter Proposals shall be invited against the proposed Individual Route
Proposal for A-B and Networks Proposals for A-B-C-D and A-B-E-F
respectively.
Step 3 All Initial Proposals and Counter Proposals shall be scrutinized as
per the eligibility conditions and minimum performance specifications
provided in Section 3.2 and Section 3.3 respectively. In an event any of the
Initial Proposal is found to be invalid at this stage, the Implementing Agency
shall drop such proposal from the prevailing bidding round under the
Scheme and likewise, not consider the Counter Proposal(s) received against
such an Initial Proposal.
Step 4 On the basis of procedure mentioned in Section 3.11 and Section
3.12 above, the Preferred Individual Route Applicant for the route A-B and
the Preferred Network Applicants for the networks A-B-C-D and A-B-E-F
shall be selected. It is to be noted that while making this selection, the RTM
Option as per Section 3.14 shall be provided to the bidders who have
submitted respective Initial Proposals for A-B, A-B-C-D and A-B-E-F.
Step 4 - Subsequently, the Applicant with the lowest VGF per RCS Seat for
the common RCS Route, i.e., A-B shall be identified.
Step 5 Assuming the Preferred Individual Route Applicant (i.e. the
Applicant with Individual Route Proposal for A-B) has quoted the lowest
VGF per RCS Seat for A-B, the Preferred Network Applicants for the
networks A-B-C-D and A-B-E-F shall be asked to match the VGF per Seat
quoted by the Preferred Individual Route Applicant.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
347
42
Step 6 Assuming the Preferred Network Applicant for the network A-B-C-
D decides to match the lowest VGF per RCS Seat for A-B and the Preferred
Network Applicant for the network A-B-E-F decides not to match the lowest
VGF per RCS Seat for A-B, the Preferred Individual Route Applicant would
not be considered further for award and the Preferred Network Applicant
for the network A-B-C-D shall be identified as the Selected Airline
Operators for the route A-B and the network A-B-C-D. The proposal for
network A-B-E-F shall not be considered further.
In the above illustration, the Selected Airline Operator for the network A-B-
C-D shall have the exclusivity of operations on the network A-B-C-D for the
RCS Route including A-B.
In the above illustration, if say the Preferred Network Applicant for the
networks A-B-C-D has quoted the lowest VGF per RCS Seat for A-B, only
the Preferred Network Applicant for the networks A-B-E-F shall be asked to
match the lowest VGF per Seat for A-B. The proposal submitted by the
Preferred Individual Route Applicant shall not be considered further.
3.13.7 MoCA recognizes that such award of Simultaneous Proposals to more than
one bidder will result in loss of exclusivity of operations on the common
RCS Routes for an individual operator. However, the Selected Airline
Operators will jointly have exclusivity of operations for a period of three (3)
years in accordance with the Scheme vis-à-vis any other operator.
3.13.8 For the purposes of this Section 3.13.8, in the event an Applicant has
submitted an Individual Route Proposal for an RCS Route with only a one-
way connectivity proposed between two airports/Water Aerodromes and
there is another Individual Route Proposal for the same RCS Route with a
to-and-fro connectivity proposed between such airports/Water Aerodromes
such that the two proposals are Simultaneous Proposals, for the purpose of
evaluation, the Individual Route Proposal providing a to-and-fro
connectivity shall be treated as a Network Proposal.
3.14 Right to Match
3.14.1 MoCA recognizes that given the present lack of adequate regional
connectivity and uncertainty in market conditions, incentivizing operators to
invest efforts & resources in exploring the market potential on various
routes, undertaking associated due diligence and submitting Initial Proposals
for RCS Routes may be necessary to encourage market participation. In this
context, a Right to Match is proposed to be provided to the Applicant
submitting an Initial Proposal if its proposal is within a certain range of the
preferred proposal. Such a mechanism would continue to incentivize the
operators to quote an optimal value even as part of their Initial Proposals
since if their value is beyond the specified range of the preferred proposal,
they will not be able to exercise such a right and not be able to derive
benefits for their initial efforts.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
348
43
3.14.2 The Applicant submitting an Initial Proposal shall be given a Right to Match
(RTM) against the respective Preferred Individual Route Applicant or
Preferred Network Applicant, as the case may be. In the event that the
Applicant which submitted an Initial Proposal is not the Preferred Individual
Route Applicant / Preferred Network Applicant, but whose financial
proposal is within a range of 10% of the financial proposal submitted by
such Preferred Individual Route Applicant or Preferred Network Applicant,
as the case may be, the Applicant will have the option of matching such
preferred applicant in terms of its financial proposal (RTM Option). If the
Applicant exercises its RTM Option, it will be declared as the Preferred
Individual Route Applicant / Preferred Network Applicant, as the case may
be.
3.14.3 In the event that the Applicant that submitted the Initial Proposal does not
exercise its RTM Option, the Preferred Individual Route Applicant /
Preferred Network Applicant shall continue to be declared as the Preferred
Individual Route Applicant / Preferred Network Applicant as the case may
be.
3.14.4 In case of more than one Initial Proposal for the same RCS Route or a
Network Proposal, the Applicant which has submitted the best financial
proposal amongst such Initial Proposals and whose financial proposal is
within a range of 10% of the financial proposal submitted by a preferred
applicant will have the RTM Option. If such Applicant does not exercise its
RTM Option, the Preferred Individual Route Applicant / Preferred Network
Applicant shall continue to be declared as the Preferred Individual Route
Applicant / Preferred Network Applicant as the case may be.
3.14.5 For Initial Proposals pertaining to an individual RCS Route or Network
Proposals satisfying the conditions given in Section 3.8.2.1.1) and Section
3.8.2.1.2), the Preferred Individual Route Applicant / Preferred Network
Applicant identified above shall be declared as the Selected Airline
Operator.
3.14.6 In case of Simultaneous Proposals, subsequent to the identification of
Preferred Individual Route Applicant / Preferred Network Applicant after
the above mentioned process, the Selected Airline Operator shall be
identified through the process specified in Sections 3.13.
3.14.7 After identification of a Selected Airline Operator for an RCS Route /
Network Proposal, the Implementing Agency will aim to provide / publish
details such as the following in respect of each identified Selected Airline
Operator.
Sl.
No.
Compositio
n of Route
/ Network
Selected
Operator
RCS Seats to be
deployed per
flight
RCS flights to
be operated per
week
Airfare
Cap for
RCS Seats
1
2
..
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
349
44
3.15 Performance Guarantee
3.15.1 As mentioned earlier, the Selected Airline Operator will enter into a Selected
Airline Operator Agreement with the Implementing Agency for operating
RCS Flights under this Scheme, within a period of 30 days failing which, the
Letter of Award may be withdrawn by the Implementing Agency. The
Selected Airline Operator shall be required to comply with all applicable
regulations for such operations under this Scheme including of the DGCA.
3.15.2 At the time of signing the Selected Airline Operator Agreement, the Selected
Airline Operator will be required to submit a Performance Guarantee to the
Implementing Agency for an amount equivalent to five percent (5%) of the
total VGF amount to be provided to such Selected Airline Operator in the
first year of its operations, subject to a minimum of Rs. Five lakhs (Rs.
5,00,000/-) per RCS Route.
3.15.3 In addition to the above, in the event that an RCS Concession Airport is non-
operational and / or requires investment of INR 50 Crores or more for
rehabilitation / upgradation of airport / Water Aerodrome infrastructure
(airside or the terminal building) by the respective airport / Water
Aerodrome owner / operator to make such RCS Concession Airport
operational / suitable for proposed RCS Flight operations through the
aircraft proposed by the bidders, the Selected Airline Operator shall be
required to submit an Additional Performance Guarantee for an amount of
INR One Crore (INR 1,00,00,000/-) to the Implementing Agency as per
timelines indicated by the Implementing Agency based on readiness of the
airport failing which, the Selected Airline Operator Agreement may be
terminated by the Implementing Agency. The decision to undertake
rehabilitation / upgradation of airport / Water Aerodrome infrastructure shall
be at the discretion of the respective airport / Water Aerodrome owner /
operator and the Implementing Agency may not consider any Initial
Proposal which proposes to provide connectivity to an Unserved or
Underserved Airport such that the rehabilitation / upgradation of airport /
Water Aerodrome infrastructure may require more than one (1) year as
determined by the Implementing Agency. For helicopter operations under
the Scheme, Additional Performance Guarantee shall not be applicable.
Provided that the requirement to undertake rehabilitation / upgradation of the
airport / Water Aerodrome infrastructure for the proposed RCS Flight
operations shall be indicated by the DGCA as per its licensing requirements
based on which, the Airports Authority of India shall be required to
undertake an assessment of the likely investment required for such
rehabilitation / upgradation. Any additional investment made by the airport /
Water Aerodrome owner/operator beyond the investment required to make
such airport / Water Aerodrome operational for the proposed RCS Flight
operations shall not be considered while calculating the investment
requirement of INR 50 crores for Additional Performance Guarantee.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
350
45
3.15.4 In addition to the provisions mentioned under Section 3.18, the Performance
Guarantee and the Additional Performance Guarantee, if any, will be dealt
with by the Implementing Agency as follows:
3.15.4.1 Performance Guarantee submitted by the Selected Airline Operator
shall be liable to encashment as per the terms and conditions of the
Selected Airline Operator Agreement, if the Selected Airline
Operator fails to:
1) Ensure integrity of the scheduled flights on routes proposed
under the Selected Airline Operator Agreement, i.e. it fails to
operate at least 70% of the scheduled flights on routes
proposed under the Selected Airline Operator Agreement in a
specified period; or
2) Adhere to any other terms and conditions of the Selected
Airline Operator Agreement.
3) Upon such encashment, the Selected Airline Operator will be
required to replenish the Performance Guarantee within a
specified period, failing which the Implementing Agency will
be entitled to terminate the Selected Airline Operator
Agreement and proceed as per provisions of the Selected
Airline Operator Agreement.
3.15.4.2 Performance Guarantee will be returned by the Implementing
Agency to the Selected Airline Operator upon completion of one
(1) year from date of commencement of RCS Flight operations on
any RCS Route as per the terms and conditions of the Selected
Airline Operator Agreement.
3.15.4.3 Additional Performance Guarantee, if any, will be returned by the
Implementing Agency to the Selected Airline Operator as per the
terms and conditions of the Selected Airline Operator Agreement:
1) If the required rehabilitation / upgradation of infrastructure to
make such RCS Concession Airport operational / suitable for
the proposed RCS Flight operations is not completed by the
end of period as indicated by the Implementing Agency; or
2) Upon completion of one (1) year from the date of
commencement of RCS Flight operations to / from the
concerned RCS Concession Airport.
3.16 Change in deployed capacity
3.16.1 A Selected Airline Operator for an RCS Route may decide to change the
capacity deployed on an RCS Route.
3.16.2 In the event that a Selected Airline Operator for an RCS Route intends to
increase the capacity deployed on an RCS Route, it shall be required to
inform the Implementing Agency in this regard such that:
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
351
46
3.16.2.1 The Selected Airline Operator shall be allowed to (a) change the
aircraft type (size) operating on an RCS Route (applicable both for
an individual RCS Route or an RCS Route as part of a network)
under the Scheme or (b) to increase or decrease the number of
flights on such RCS Route to any number such that the number of
RCS Flights shall not be less than three (3) per week and can be a
maximum of fourteen (14) departures per week for routes
providing connectivity to Priority Area(s) and a maximum of seven
(7) departures per week for RCS Routes connecting other than
Priority Area(s).
3.16.2.2 The total VGF per year (i.e. a product of number of RCS Seats per
RCS Flight, VGF per RCS Seat and number of RCS Flights in a
year, as provided by the SAO as part of its Initial / Counter
Proposal) as available to the Selected Airline Operator after
increase or decrease in capacity deployed shall remain the same as
permitted at the time of executing the Selected Airline Operator
Agreement.
3.16.2.3 The Implementing Agency shall undertake a reconciliation of total
RCS Flights operated by the SAO in a given Financial Quarter as
compared to the proposed number of RCS Flights submitted as part
of its Technical Proposal. The Implementing Agency shall also
require the SAO to submit its plans for RCS Flight operations for
remaining Financial Quarters in any given year. The number of
RCS Flights for which VGF could be disbursed in the remaining
Financial Quarters (depending upon the performance of the SAO)
shall be limited in a manner that under no circumstances, the total
VGF disbursed per year shall be more than the total VGF per year
as permitted at the time of executing the Selected Airline Operator
Agreement.
3.16.2.4 In order to avoid inconvenience to passengers, the airline will have
to follow relevant DGCA rules of informing the passengers about
changes in the schedule of flight operation, in advance. For
avoidance of doubt, the Selected Airline Operator shall not be
provided any benefits or concessions under the Scheme on any
additional flights operated by the Selected Airline Operator on an
RCS Route, beyond fourteen (14) departures per week for RCS
Routes providing connectivity to Priority Area(s) and seven (7)
departures per week for RCS Routes connecting other than Priority
Area(s).
3.16.2.5 In the event that a Selected Airline Operator changes the aircraft
type (size) operating on an RCS Route under the Scheme, the
number of RCS Seats to be provided shall have reference to
Section 3.3.1.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
352
47
3.16.2.6 The total VGF per flight shall be equally spread over the revised
number of RCS Seats in a flight. The VGF per RCS Seat shall be
adjusted accordingly to arrive at the same total VGF per flight.
3.16.3 In the event that a Selected Airline Operator for an RCS Route intends to
decrease the capacity deployed on an RCS Route, it shall be required to
inform the same to the Implementing Agency. Such decrease in capacity
deployed on an RCS Route shall only be permitted if (a) such reduction is on
account of change in aircraft type and (b) all minimum conditions (such as
number of RCS Seats per RCS Flight,.) as submitted by such Selected
Airline Operator at the time of its selection are continued to be met. No
reduction in the number of RCS Seats per RCS Flight shall be considered by
the Implementing Agency.
3.16.3.1 In an event where due to any orders/guidelines issued by the
DGCA, the actual deployed capacity in an RCS Flight by the
Selected Airline Operator is less than the RCS Flight Capacity
offered, the RCS Flight Capacity for the purposes of calculation of
RCS Seats, disbursement of VGF and compliance with the terms
and conditions of the Selected Airline Operator Agreement, shall
be considered as the actual deployed capacity on such RCS Flight
based on DGCA orders/guidelines.
3.16.4 Change in deployed capacity due to operational reasons
3.16.4.1 In an event where due to temporary operational reasons such as
availability of the aircraft etc., the actual deployed capacity on a
particular RCS Flight is different from the RCS Flight Capacity
required under the Selected Airline Operator Agreement, the
Selected Airline Operator shall be permitted such change if the
actual deployed capacity is at least 90% of the RCS Flight Capacity
as per the Selected Airline Operator Agreement and is not more
than 110% of the RCS Flight Capacity as per the Selected Airline
Operator Agreement. Provided that, in such an event, the number
of RCS Seats per RCS Flight shall remain the same as provided in
the Selected Airline Operator Agreement. In the event that the
actual deployed capacity is less than 90% of the RCS Flight
Capacity as per the Selected Airline Operator Agreement or is
more than 110% of the RCS Flight Capacity as per the Selected
Airline Operator Agreement, it shall be considered as default under
the Selected Airline Operator Agreement and the Performance
Guarantee of the Selected Airline Operator shall be liable to be
encashed and retained as per the terms and conditions of the
Selected Airline Operator Agreement.
3.16.5 The Selected Airline Operator shall be allowed to operate charter flights as
per the regulations of DGCA, provided that the proposed schedule and
service levels or any other conditions under the Scheme are not impacted.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
353
48
3.16.6 Change in sequence of routes due to operational reasons
3.16.6.1 In an event where due to operational reasons (including but not
restricted to slot availability, etc.), the Selected Airline Operator
intends to change the sequence of routes as per the Selected Airline
Operator Agreement, the Selected Airline Operator (SAO) shall
intimate the Implementing Agency in writing before undertaking
any such change in sequence of routes.
Provided that, any such change is permitted only for modifying the
sequence of RCS Routes in a network but not the direction of
routes. For instance, if a network A-B-C-A has A-B and C-A as
RCS Routes, a change in sequence to C-A and A-B is permitted.
However, a change in direction of routes such as B-A or A-C is not
permitted.
3.17 Prioritisation Framework
3.17.1 The Implementing Agency shall have reference to the Scheme objectives at
all points of time and prioritize proposals for being supported under the
Scheme.
3.17.2 For award of proposals under the Scheme, the Implementing Agency would
consider a prioritization framework in the following manner (in the
decreasing order of priority).
3.17.2.1 Network or Individual Route Proposal comprising airports
provided as part of Annexure 6A would be given the highest
priority. Amongst such proposals, the proposals comprising
airports in Priority Area(s) shall be given a higher priority. A list of
routes which were earlier awarded / commenced under RCS but
cancelled due to various reasons, are provided in Annexure 6B.
3.17.2.2 Pursuant to considerations of proposals under Section 3.17.2.1,
proposals comprising airports that are not part of Annexure 6 but
located in Priority Area(s) would be given the next higher priority.
Amongst such proposals, highest priority would be given to
proposals comprising NER Routes (as listed in Annexure 8) and
Lakshadweep Specific Route, followed by proposals comprising
routes connecting Unserved Airports, Underserved Airports and
Served Airports in that order.
3.17.2.3 Pursuant to considerations of proposals under Section 3.17.2.2,
proposals comprising airports that are not part of Annexure 6 and
located in areas other than Priority Area(s) would be considered.
Amongst such proposals, highest priority would be given to
proposals comprising routes connecting Unserved Airports,
Underserved Airports and Served Airports in that order.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
354
49
3.17.3 Network Proposal(s) would generally be given a higher priority against an
Individual Route Proposal.
3.17.4 At any point of time, in case there are multiple proposals received for a
particular Underserved Airport or Unserved Airport, given the scarcity of
resources, the Implementing Agency at its discretion, may consider such
proposals in a manner that if such Underserved Airport or Unserved Airport
becomes Served Airport after awarding certain proposals, no additional
proposals may be considered. The Implementing Agency shall also have
reference to the VGF requirement while considering such proposals.
3.18 Exit from the Scheme
3.18.1 A Selected Airline Operator may cease RCS Flight operations for any reason
any time after one (1) year from the date of commencement of RCS Flight
operations on any RCS Route. In the event of such cessation of RCS Flight
operations, provided there is no default by the Selected Airline Operator
under the Selected Airline Operator Agreement, the Performance Guarantee
and the Additional Performance Guarantee, if any, shall be returned to the
Selected Airline Operator.
3.18.2 If however, a Selected Airline Operator ceases RCS Flight operations before
completion of one (1) year from the date of commencement of such RCS
Flight operations on any RCS Route, the Performance Guarantee and the
Additional Performance Guarantee, if any, shall be liable to be encashed and
retained as per the terms and conditions of the Selected Airline Operator
Agreement.
3.18.3 If, pursuant to Section 2.1.4.2 of this Scheme, the Scheme is withdrawn at
any time, the Performance Guarantee and the Additional Performance
Guarantee, if any, shall be returned to the Selected Airline Operator.
3.18.4 Notwithstanding other provisions under this Scheme, a Selected Airline
Operator shall be permitted, as per terms and conditions to be specified
under the Selected Airline Operator Agreement, to assign its rights under the
Scheme to another airline operator having a valid AOP for a similar type of
aircraft as required under the Selected Airline Operator Agreement, provided
the Selected Airline Operator has completed at least six (6) months of
operations from the date of commencement of RCS Flight operations on any
RCS Route.
3.19 Reporting Obligations for a Selected Airline Operator
3.19.1 The VGF payment will be made to the Selected Airline Operator from the
Regional Connectivity Fund (RCF) on the completion of every month.
3.19.2 Additionally, this fund will be used to provide appropriate administrative
charges to the Implementing Agency for implementing the Scheme.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
355
50
3.19.3 For the sanction of monthly VGF payment, the Selected Airline Operator on
an RCS Route will be required to submit information on specified
parameters, which will be used by the Implementing Agency to monitor
adherence to the agreed terms and conditions of Selected Airline Operator
Agreement.
3.19.3.1 The Selected Airline Operator shall be required to submit the Flight
Manifest as per Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP)
requirements.
3.19.3.2 In addition to this, the Selected Airline Operator will need to
submit RCS specific information as specified under the Selected
Airline Operator Agreement.
3.20 Disbursement of Funds
3.20.1 The VGF shall be disbursed to the Selected Airline Operator only for RCS
Seats pertaining to the RCS Flights that have been operated in a month. In an
event, GST is applicable on the VGF disbursed to the Selected Airline
Operator, the GST component shall be payable from the RCF.
3.20.2 The Selected Airline Operator(s) will be required to submit to the
Implementing Agency, all information pertaining to RCS Flights operated
during a month as required in Section 3.19.
3.20.3 The Implementing Agency will scrutinize the information received from the
Selected Airline Operator(s) for compliance with the conditions of Selected
Airline Operator Agreement.
3.20.4 The VGF shall be disbursed by the Implementing Agency to the Selected
Airline Operator for all deployed RCS Seats, irrespective of the occupancy,
for every RCS Flight operated on the RCS Route during the reporting
period, after adjustments for any defaults by the Selected Airline Operator
under the Selected Airline Operator Agreement.
3.20.5 The incentives / support provided under the Scheme is based on the premise
that a Selected Airline Operator shall sell RCS Seats first before selling any
other passenger seats on an RCS Flight (including Non-RCS Seats).
Provided that, such restriction shall not be applicable on “business class”
seats (or any other term as may be used by the Selected Airline Operator to
identify seats which are different from other available seats by design, form,
factor and/or arrangement, and having a clear well-defined separate section
within the aircraft cabin seating arrangement). Provided that, the passengers
at all times have an option to choose between RCS Seat(s) and such
“business class” seat(s) and shall not be forced to buy such “business class”
seats when RCS Seats are available in the RCS Flight.
3.20.6 The Implementing Agency may undertake a review / audit of the
performance of a Selected Airline Operator including inter alia on this
aspect from time to time through independent auditors. The penalties for
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
356
51
breach of such principle shall be specified in the Selected Airline Operator
Agreement between the Implementing Agency and the Selected Airline
Operator. A Selected Airline Operator shall be required to maintain relevant
records for a period of at least 3 years after the expiry of its Selected Airline
Operator Agreement to facilitate such monitoring.
3.20.6.1 MoCA recognizes that cancellation of tickets is a normal business
phenomenon in aviation industry and certain passengers may
cancel their RCS Seats before the flight departure which may not
provide sufficient time to a Selected Airline Operator to resell such
RCS Seats. In such an event any RCS Seat, which does not get sold
due to cancellation by a passenger, shall be considered as sold for
the purpose of Sections 3.20.5 above. However, the obligation of
proving such cancellation in terms of relevant details (passenger
identification, etc.) shall be on the Selected Airline Operator.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
357
52
Annexure 1A: List of Underserved Airports /
Airstrips in the country
Presented below is a tentative list of Underserved Airports. Applicants are advised to check the
updates in this regard on AAI / MoCA website from time to time. Further, Applicants are expected to
undertake their own due diligence vis-à-vis suitability of these airports for their proposals.
In case any such airport is a defence airport, the approval from Ministry of Defence, Government of
India will need to be obtained for permitting joint use / civil operations under the Scheme.
It may be noted that this list does not include RCS Heliports. Applicants interested to submit
proposals for helicopter operations will be required to ascertain eligible RCS Heliports from DGCA.
S.No.
Name of Airport/Airstrip
State/ UT (where the
Airport/ Airstrip
is located)
Reference Code as per
Planning
Calendar
AIRPORTS IN PRIORITY AREA
1.
Passighat
Arunachal Pradesh
3C
2.
Tezu
Arunachal Pradesh
3C
3.
Jorhat
Assam
4C
4.
Rupsi
Assam
3C
5.
Tezpur
Assam
4C
6.
Kargil
Jammu and Kashmir
<20 seats
7.
Thoise
Jammu and Kashmir
4C
8.
Agatti
Lakshadweep Island
3C
9.
Shillong
Meghalaya
3C
AIRPORTS IN AREA OTHER THAN PRIORITY AREA
10.
Kurnool
Andhra Pradesh
3C
11.
Mundra
Gujarat
<20 seats
12.
Bokaro
Jharkhand
3C
13.
Amravati
Maharashtra
3C
14.
Sindhudurg
Maharashtra
3C
15.
Ratnagiri
Maharashtra
3C
16.
Rourkela
Orissa
<20 seats
17.
Ludhiana
Punjab
3C
18.
Pathankot
Punjab
4C
19.
Kota
Rajasthan
<20 seats
20.
Uterlai
Rajasthan
4C
21.
Ramnad
Tamil Nadu
<20 seats
22.
Salem
Tamil Nadu
3C
23.
Faizabad (Ayodhaya)
Uttar Pradesh
3C
24.
Saharanpur (Sarsawa)
Uttar Pradesh
4C
25.
Hashimara
West Bengal
4C
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
358
53
Annexure 1B: List of Unserved Airports /
Airstrips in the country
Presented below is a tentative list of Unserved Airports. Applicants are advised to check the updates
in this regard on AAI / MoCA website from time to time. Further, Applicants are expected to
undertake their own due diligence vis-à-vis suitability of these airports for their proposals.
In case any such airport is a defence airport, the approval from Ministry of Defence, Government of
India will need to be obtained for permitting joint use / civil operations under the Scheme.
It may be noted that this list does not include RCS Heliports. Applicants interested to submit
proposals for helicopter operations will be required to ascertain eligible RCS Heliports from DGCA.
S.No.
Name of Airport/Airstrip
State/ UT (where the
Airport/ Airstrip
is located)
Reference Code as per
Planning
Calander
AIRPORTS IN PRIORITY AREA
1.
Campbell Bay
Andaman &Nicobar(UT)
<20 seats
2.
Car Nicobar
Andaman &Nicobar(UT)
4C
3.
Shibpur
Andaman &Nicobar(UT)
<20 seats
4.
Alinya
Arunachal Pradesh
<9
5.
Along
Arunachal Pradesh
<9
6.
Daparizo*
Arunachal Pradesh
<9
7.
Mechuka
Arunachal Pradesh
<9
8.
Tuting*
Arunachal Pradesh
<9
9.
Vijaynagar
Arunachal Pradesh
<9
10.
Walong*
Arunachal Pradesh
<9
11.
Yinghiong*
Arunachal Pradesh
<9
12.
Ziro
Arunachal Pradesh
<9
13.
Chabua
Assam
4C
14.
Darrang
Assam
<20 seats
15.
Dinjan
Assam
<20 seats
16.
Ledo
Assam
<20 seats
17.
Misa Mari
Assam
<20 seats
18.
Nazira
Assam
<20 seats
19.
Sadiya
Assam
<20 seats
20.
Sorbhog
Assam
<20 seats
21.
Sukerating (Dum Duma)
Assam
<20 seats
22.
Akhnur
Jammu and Kashmir
<20 seats
23.
Chamb
Jammu and Kashmir
<20 seats
24.
Chushal
Jammu and Kashmir
<20 seats
25.
Fukche
Jammu and Kashmir
4C
26.
Gurex
Jammu and Kashmir
<20 seats
27.
Jhangar
Jammu and Kashmir
<20 seats
28.
Miran Sahib
Jammu and Kashmir
<20 seats
29.
Panzgam
Jammu and Kashmir
<20 seats
30.
Poonch
Jammu and Kashmir
<20 seats
31.
Rajouri
Jammu and Kashmir
<20 seats
32.
Udhampur
Jammu and Kashmir
4C
33.
Dwara
Meghalaya
<9
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
359
54
34.
Shella
Meghalaya
<20 seats
35.
Tura
Meghalaya
<20 seats
36.
Kailashahar
Tripura
<20 seats
37.
Kamalpur
Tripura
3B
38.
Khowai
Tripura
<20 seats
39.
Chinyalisaur*
Uttarakhand
<9
40.
Gaucher*
Uttarakhand
<9
AIRPORTS IN AREA OTHER THAN PRIORITY AREA
41.
Bobbili
Andhra Pradesh
<20 seats
42.
Donakonda
Andhra Pradesh
<20 seats
43.
Ellore
Andhra Pradesh
<20 seats
44.
Arrah
Bihar
No runway
45.
Begusarai
Bihar
2A
46.
Bettiah
Bihar
<9
47.
Bhabua(Kaimoor)
Bihar
No runway
48.
Bhagalpur
Bihar
<20 seats
49.
Bihar Shariff
Bihar
No runway
50.
Bihita
Bihar
4C
51.
Birpur
Bihar
2A
52.
Buxur
Bihar
No runway
53.
Chhapra
Bihar
<20 seats
54.
Dehri on sonn
Bihar
No runway
55.
Farbisganj
Bihar
<20 seats
56.
Hathwa
Bihar
<20 seats
57.
Jehanabad
Bihar
<20 seats
58.
Jogbani
Bihar
<20 seats
59.
Katihar
Bihar
<20 seats
60.
Kishanganj
Bihar
2A
61.
Madhubani
Bihar
<20 seats
62.
Monghyr
Bihar
<9
63.
Motihari
Bihar
No runway
64.
Munger
Bihar
<9
65.
Muzzafarpur
Bihar
<20 seats
66.
Naria
Bihar
2A
67.
Panchanpur
Bihar
<20 seats
68.
Raxaul
Bihar
<20 seats
69.
Saharsa
Bihar
<20 seats
70.
Valmiki Nagar
Bihar
<20 seats
71.
Ambikapur
Chattisgarh
<20 seats
72.
Bilaspur
Chattisgarh
<20 seats
73.
Amreli (Amroli)
Gujarat
3B
74.
Chela
Gujarat
<20 seats
75.
Chhand Bet
Gujarat
<20 seats
76.
Deesa (Palanpur)
Gujarat
<20 seats
77.
Mandvi
Gujarat
<20 seats
78.
Mehsana
Gujarat
<20 seats
79.
Naliya
Gujarat
<20 seats
80.
Bhiwani
Haryana
2A
81.
Hissar
Haryana
2A
82.
Karnal
Haryana
2A
83.
Narnaul
Haryana
2A
84.
Sirsa
Haryana
4C
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
360
55
85.
Chaibasa
Jharkhand
No runway
86.
Chakulia
Jharkhand
3C
87.
Dalbhundarh
Jharkhand
No runway
88.
Daltonganj
Jharkhand
<20 seats
89.
Deoghar
Jharkhand
2A
90.
Dhanbad
Jharkhand
2A
91.
Dumka
Jharkhand
<20 seats
92.
Giridhi
Jharkhand
No runway
93.
Jamshedpur
Jharkhand
<20 seats
94.
Sindri
Jharkhand
<20 seats
95.
Bellary
Karnataka
<20 seats
96.
Karwar
Karnataka
<20 seats
97.
Kolar
Karnataka
3C
98.
Kushalnagar
Karnataka
<20 seats
99.
Birwa
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
100.
Chhindwara
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
101.
Damoh
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
102.
Datia
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
103.
Guna
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
104.
Khandwa
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
105.
Khargone
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
106.
Mandla (Kanha)
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
107.
Mandsaur (Sitamau)
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
108.
Nagda (Ujjain)
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
109.
Neemuch
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
110.
Pachmarhi Hoshangabad
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
111.
Ratlam
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
112.
Rewa
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
113.
Sagar
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
114.
Satna
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
115.
Seoni
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
116.
Shahdol
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
117.
Shivpuri
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
118.
Sidhi
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
119.
Ujjain
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
120.
Umaria
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
121.
Akola
Maharashtra
<20 seats
122.
Baramati
Maharashtra
<20 seats
123.
Chandrapur
Maharashtra
<20 seats
124.
Darna Camp
Maharashtra
<20 seats
125.
Deolali
Maharashtra
<20 seats
126.
Dhulia
Maharashtra
<20 seats
127.
Gondia
Maharashtra
4C
128.
Jath
Maharashtra
<20 seats
129.
Karad
Maharashtra
<20 seats
130.
Kawalpur
Maharashtra
<20 seats
131.
Kudal
Maharashtra
<20 seats
132.
Latur (MADC)
Maharashtra
<20 seats
133.
LonavalaAmby Valley
Maharashtra
<20 seats
134.
Osmanabad
Maharashtra
<20 seats
135.
Phaltan
Maharashtra
<20 seats
136.
Shirpur
Maharashtra
<20 seats
137.
Waluj
Maharashtra
<20 seats
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
361
56
138.
Amarda Road
Orissa
<20 seats
139.
Angul
Orissa
<20 seats
140.
Barbil
Orissa
2A
141.
Birasal
Orissa
No runway
142.
Gudari
Orissa
3B
143.
Hirakund
Orissa
3B
144.
Jayakpur
Orissa
<20 seats
145.
Jeypore
Orissa
<20 seats
146.
Lanjigarh
Orissa
2B
147.
Nawapara
Orissa
2A
148.
Padampur
Orissa
2A
149.
Rairangpur
Orissa
2A
150.
Raisuan
Orissa
2A
151.
Rangeilunda
Orissa
2A
152.
Sukinda
Orissa
2A
153.
Theruboli
Orissa
2A
154.
Tushra
Orissa
2A
155.
Utkela
Orissa
<20 seats
156.
Beas
Punjab
4C
157.
Patiala
Punjab
2A
158.
Abu Road
Rajasthan
2A
159.
Alwar
Rajasthan
2A
160.
Banasthali
Rajasthan
2A
161.
Banswara (Tilwara)
Rajasthan
4B
162.
Bharatpur
Rajasthan
<20 seats
163.
Dholpur
Rajasthan
<20 seats
164.
Gadra Road
Rajasthan
<20 seats
165.
Hamirgarh
Rajasthan
3A
166.
Isarda
Rajasthan
2B
167.
Jhalawar (Brijnagar)
Rajasthan
3B
168.
Jhunjhunu
Rajasthan
3B
169.
Kankoroli
Rajasthan
3A
170.
Lalgarh
Rajasthan
3A
171.
Malapura
Rajasthan
<20 seats
172.
Mathania
Rajasthan
<20 seats
173.
Merta Road
Rajasthan
<20 seats
174.
Nagaur
Rajasthan
3A
175.
Pilani
Rajasthan
2A
176.
Salawas
Rajasthan
2B
177.
SawaiMadhopur
Rajasthan
<20 seats
178.
Shahpur
Rajasthan
<20 seats
179.
Sirohi
Rajasthan
3B
180.
Suratgarh
Rajasthan
<20 seats
181.
Arkonam
Tamil Nadu
<20 seats
182.
Chetinad
Tamil Nadu
3C
183.
Cholavaram
Tamil Nadu
<20 seats
184.
Neyveli
Tamil Nadu
<20 seats
185.
Sulur
Tamil Nadu
<20 seats
186.
Ulundurpet
Tamil Nadu
<20 seats
187.
Vellore
Tamil Nadu
<20 seats
188.
Adilabad
Telengana
<20 seats
189.
Aleru
Telengana
<20 seats
190.
Kagazpur (Sirpur)
Telengana
No runway
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
362
57
191.
Akbarpur
Uttar Pradesh
3A
192.
Aligarh
Uttar Pradesh
3B
193.
Azamgarh
Uttar Pradesh
<20 seats
194.
Bareilly
Uttar Pradesh
4C
195.
Chitrakoot
Uttar Pradesh
<20 seats
196.
Etawah (Safai)
Uttar Pradesh
4C
197.
Farrukhabad
Uttar Pradesh
<20 seats
198.
Fursatganj (Igrua)
Uttar Pradesh
3C
199.
Lalitpur
Uttar Pradesh
3C
200.
Moradabad
Uttar Pradesh
3B
201.
Muirpur
Uttar Pradesh
<20 seats
202.
Palia
Uttar Pradesh
<20 seats
203.
Rasoolabad
Uttar Pradesh
<20 seats
204.
Shravasti
Uttar Pradesh
2A
205.
Sultanpur (Amhai)
Uttar Pradesh
3B
206.
Ambari
West Bengal
<20 seats
207.
Asansol
West Bengal
<20 seats
208.
Balurghat
West Bengal
<20 seats
209.
Barrackpore
West Bengal
<20 seats
210.
Behrampur
West Bengal
Helipad
211.
Bhatpara
West Bengal
<20 seats
212.
Bishnupur
West Bengal
<20 seats
213.
Burnpur
West Bengal
<20 seats
214.
Cooch Behar
West Bengal
<20 seats
215.
Dhubalia
West Bengal
<20 seats
216.
Digri
West Bengal
<20 seats
217.
Dudhkundi
West Bengal
<20 seats
218.
Guskhara
West Bengal
<20 seats
219.
Kanchrapara
West Bengal
<20 seats
220.
Kharagpur
West Bengal
<20 seats
221.
Madhaiganj
West Bengal
<20 seats
222.
Maheshganj
West Bengal
<20 seats
223.
Malda
West Bengal
<20 seats
224.
New lands
West Bengal
No runway
225.
Panagarh
West Bengal
<20 seats
226.
Pandeveswar
West Bengal
<20 seats
227.
Piardora
West Bengal
<20 seats
228.
Rampurhat
West Bengal
<20 seats
229.
Sal Bani
West Bengal
<20 seats
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
363
58
Annexure 1C: List of Water Aerodromes
S.No.
Name of Water Aerodrome
State / UT (where the Water
Aerodrome is located)
1.
Hutbay
Andaman & Nicobar
2.
Long Island
Andaman & Nicobar
3.
Neil Island
Andaman & Nicobar
4.
Havelock
Andaman & Nicobar
5.
Prakasam Barrage
Andhra Pradesh
6.
Umrangso Reservoir
Assam
7.
Guwahati River Front
Assam
8.
Statue of Unity, Sardar Sarovar Dam
Gujarat
9.
Sabarmati River Front, Ahmedabad.
Gujarat
10.
Dharoj Dam
Gujarat
11.
Shatrunjay Dam
Gujarat
12.
Minicoy
Lakshadweep
13.
Kavaratti
Lakshadweep
14.
Erai Dam, Distt. Chandarpur
Maharashtra
15.
Khindsi Dam, Distt. Nagpur
Maharashtra
16.
Tehri Dam
Uttarakhand
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
364
59
Annexure 1D: List of airports in areas other
than Priority Area(s) that would support
operation of Category 1A aircraft
S.No.
Name of Airport/Airstrip
State/ UT (where the
Airport/ Airstrip is
located)
Reference Code as per
Planning Calendar
1.
Mundra
Gujarat
<20 seats
2.
Rourkela
Orissa
<20 seats
3.
Kota
Rajasthan
<20 seats
4.
Ramnad
Tamil Nadu
<20 seats
5.
Bobbili
Andhra Pradesh
<20 seats
6.
Donakonda
Andhra Pradesh
<20 seats
7.
Ellore
Andhra Pradesh
<20 seats
8.
Arrah
Bihar
No runway
9.
Begusarai
Bihar
<9
10.
Bettiah
Bihar
<9
11.
Bhabua(Kaimoor)
Bihar
No runway
12.
Bhagalpur
Bihar
<20 seats
13.
Bihar Shariff
Bihar
No runway
14.
Birpur
Bihar
<9
15.
Buxur
Bihar
No runway
16.
Chhapra
Bihar
<20 seats
17.
Dehri on sonn
Bihar
No runway
18.
Farbisganj
Bihar
<20 seats
19.
Hathwa
Bihar
<20 seats
20.
Jehanabad
Bihar
<20 seats
21.
Jogbani
Bihar
<20 seats
22.
Katihar
Bihar
<20 seats
23.
Kishanganj
Bihar
<9
24.
Madhubani
Bihar
<20 seats
25.
Monghyr
Bihar
<9
26.
Motihari
Bihar
No runway
27.
Munger
Bihar
<9
28.
Muzzafarpur
Bihar
<20 seats
29.
Naria
Bihar
<9
30.
Panchanpur
Bihar
<20 seats
31.
Raxaul
Bihar
<20 seats
32.
Saharsa
Bihar
<20 seats
33.
Valmiki Nagar
Bihar
<20 seats
34.
Ambikapur
Chattisgarh
<20 seats
35.
Bilaspur
Chattisgarh
<20 seats
36.
Amreli (Amroli)
Gujarat
<20 seats
37.
Chela
Gujarat
<20 seats
38.
Chhand Bet
Gujarat
<20 seats
39.
Deesa (Palanpur)
Gujarat
<20 seats
40.
Mandvi
Gujarat
<20 seats
41.
Mehsana
Gujarat
<20 seats
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
365
60
42.
Naliya
Gujarat
<20 seats
43.
Bhiwani
Haryana
<9
44.
Hissar
Haryana
<20 seats
45.
Karnal
Haryana
<9
46.
Narnaul
Haryana
<9
47.
Chaibasa
Jharkhand
No runway
48.
Chakulia
Jharkhand
<20 seats
49.
Dalbhundarh
Jharkhand
No runway
50.
Daltonganj
Jharkhand
<20 seats
51.
Deoghar
Jharkhand
<9
52.
Dhanbad
Jharkhand
<9
53.
Dumka
Jharkhand
<20 seats
54.
Giridhi
Jharkhand
No runway
55.
Jamshedpur
Jharkhand
<20 seats
56.
Sindri
Jharkhand
<20 seats
57.
Bellary
Karnataka
<20 seats
58.
Karwar
Karnataka
<20 seats
59.
Kolar
Karnataka
<20 seats
60.
Kushalnagar
Karnataka
<20 seats
61.
Birwa
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
62.
Chhindwara
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
63.
Damoh
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
64.
Datia
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
65.
Guna
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
66.
Khandwa
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
67.
Khargone
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
68.
Mandla (Kanha)
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
69.
Mandsaur (Sitamau)
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
70.
Nagda (Ujjain)
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
71.
Neemuch
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
72.
Pachmarhi Hoshangabad
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
73.
Ratlam
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
74.
Rewa
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
75.
Sagar
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
76.
Satna
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
77.
Seoni
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
78.
Shahdol
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
79.
Shivpuri
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
80.
Sidhi
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
81.
Ujjain
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
82.
Umaria
Madhya Pradesh
<20 seats
83.
Akola
Maharashtra
<20 seats
84.
Baramati
Maharashtra
<20 seats
85.
Chandrapur
Maharashtra
<20 seats
86.
Darna Camp
Maharashtra
<20 seats
87.
Deolali
Maharashtra
<20 seats
88.
Dhulia
Maharashtra
<20 seats
89.
Jath
Maharashtra
<20 seats
90.
Karad
Maharashtra
<20 seats
91.
Kawalpur
Maharashtra
<20 seats
92.
Kudal
Maharashtra
<20 seats
93.
Latur (MADC)
Maharashtra
<20 seats
94.
LonavalaAmby Valley
Maharashtra
<20 seats
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
366
61
95.
Osmanabad
Maharashtra
<20 seats
96.
Phaltan
Maharashtra
<20 seats
97.
Shirpur
Maharashtra
<20 seats
98.
Waluj
Maharashtra
<20 seats
99.
Amarda Road
Orissa
<20 seats
100.
Angul
Orissa
<20 seats
101.
Barbil
Orissa
<9
102.
Birasal
Orissa
No runway
103.
Gudari
Orissa
<20 seats
104.
Hirakund
Orissa
<20 seats
105.
Jayakpur
Orissa
<20 seats
106.
Jeypore
Orissa
<20 seats
107.
Lanjigarh
Orissa
<20 seats
108.
Nawapara
Orissa
<9
109.
Padampur
Orissa
<9
110.
Rairangpur
Orissa
<9
111.
Raisuan
Orissa
<9
112.
Rangeilunda
Orissa
<9
113.
Sukinda
Orissa
<9
114.
Theruboli
Orissa
<9
115.
Tushra
Orissa
<9
116.
Utkela
Orissa
<20 seats
117.
Patiala
Punjab
<9
118.
Abu Road
Rajasthan
<9
119.
Alwar
Rajasthan
<9
120.
Banasthali
Rajasthan
<9
121.
Banswara (Tilwara)
Rajasthan
<20 seats
122.
Bharatpur
Rajasthan
<20 seats
123.
Dholpur
Rajasthan
<20 seats
124.
Gadra Road
Rajasthan
<20 seats
125.
Hamirgarh
Rajasthan
<20 seats
126.
Isarda
Rajasthan
<20 seats
127.
Jhalawar (Brijnagar)
Rajasthan
<20 seats
128.
Jhunjhunu
Rajasthan
<20 seats
129.
Kankoroli
Rajasthan
<20 seats
130.
Lalgarh
Rajasthan
<20 seats
131.
Malapura
Rajasthan
<20 seats
132.
Mathania
Rajasthan
<20 seats
133.
Merta Road
Rajasthan
<20 seats
134.
Nagaur
Rajasthan
<20 seats
135.
Pilani
Rajasthan
<20 seats
136.
Salawas
Rajasthan
<20 seats
137.
SawaiMadhopur
Rajasthan
<20 seats
138.
Shahpur
Rajasthan
<20 seats
139.
Sirohi
Rajasthan
<20 seats
140.
Suratgarh
Rajasthan
<20 seats
141.
Arkonam
Tamil Nadu
<20 seats
142.
Chetinad
Tamil Nadu
<20 seats
143.
Cholavaram
Tamil Nadu
<20 seats
144.
Neyveli
Tamil Nadu
<20 seats
145.
Sulur
Tamil Nadu
<20 seats
146.
Ulundurpet
Tamil Nadu
<20 seats
147.
Vellore
Tamil Nadu
<20 seats
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
367
62
148.
Adilabad
Telengana
<20 seats
149.
Aleru
Telengana
<20 seats
150.
Kagazpur (Sirpur)
Telengana
No runway
151.
Akbarpur
Uttar Pradesh
<20 seats
152.
Aligarh
Uttar Pradesh
<20 seats
153.
Azamgarh
Uttar Pradesh
<20 seats
154.
Chitrakoot
Uttar Pradesh
<20 seats
155.
Farrukhabad
Uttar Pradesh
<20 seats
156.
Moradabad
Uttar Pradesh
<20 seats
157.
Muirpur
Uttar Pradesh
<20 seats
158.
Palia
Uttar Pradesh
<20 seats
159.
Rasoolabad
Uttar Pradesh
<20 seats
160.
Shravasti
Uttar Pradesh
<20 seats
161.
Sultanpur (Amhai)
Uttar Pradesh
<20 seats
162.
Ambari
West Bengal
<20 seats
163.
Asansol
West Bengal
<20 seats
164.
Balurghat
West Bengal
<20 seats
165.
Barrackpore
West Bengal
<20 seats
166.
Bhatpara
West Bengal
<20 seats
167.
Bishnupur
West Bengal
<20 seats
168.
Burnpur
West Bengal
<20 seats
169.
Cooch Behar
West Bengal
<20 seats
170.
Dhubalia
West Bengal
<20 seats
171.
Digri
West Bengal
<20 seats
172.
Dudhkundi
West Bengal
<20 seats
173.
Guskhara
West Bengal
<20 seats
174.
Kanchrapara
West Bengal
<20 seats
175.
Kharagpur
West Bengal
<20 seats
176.
Madhaiganj
West Bengal
<20 seats
177.
Maheshganj
West Bengal
<20 seats
178.
Malda
West Bengal
<20 seats
179.
New lands
West Bengal
No runway
180.
Panagarh
West Bengal
<20 seats
181.
Pandeveswar
West Bengal
<20 seats
182.
Piardora
West Bengal
<20 seats
183.
Rampurhat
West Bengal
<20 seats
184.
Sal Bani
West Bengal
<20 seats
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
368
63
Annexure 2: Airfare Cap under RCS
Airfare Cap to be considered for respective stage lengths / flight duration are as follows (Refer
Section 2.3 above):
Airfare Cap for Fixed-wing aircraft
S.No.
Stage Length (in km)
Airfare Cap per RCS Seat (in INR)
1.
1 50
1661
2.
51 75
1661
3.
76 100
1661
4.
101 125
1661
5.
126 150
1661
6.
151 175
1661
7.
176 200
1755
8.
201 225
1849
9.
226 250
1954
10.
251 275
2048
11.
276 300
2141
12.
301 325
2246
13.
326 350
2340
14.
351 375
2434
15.
376 400
2539
16.
401 425
2633
17.
426 450
2726
18.
451 475
2831
19.
476 500
2925
20.
501 525
2925
21.
526 550
3030
22.
551 575
3136
23.
576 600
3241
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
369
64
Airfare cap for helicopters
S.No.
Flight Duration (in minutes)
Airfare Cap per RCS Seat (in INR)
1.
00 30
2,849
2.
31 35
3,309
3.
36 40
3,814
4.
41 45
4,274
5.
46 50
4,734
6.
51 55
5,251
7.
56 60
5,710
8.
> 60
5,710
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
370
65
Annexure 3: VGF Cap under RCS
VGF Cap to be considered for respective stage lengths / flight duration are as follows (Refer Section
2.5 above).
VGF cap for different type of aircraft for operation in Priority Area(s), include Priority RCS
Routes, State RCS Routes in Priority Area(s), Lakshadweep Specific Route, and NER Routes
Stage length
Cat 1/1A
Cat 2/3
1-50
554
2310
51-75
1413
2609
76-100
1986
2809
101-125
2558
3012
126-150
3116
3212
151-175
3688
3411
176-200
4058
3517
201-225
4430
3622
226-250
4785
3717
251-275
5171
3883
276-300
5556
4169
301-325
5927
4443
326-350
6284
4728
351-375
6670
5012
376-400
7039
5286
401-425
7411
5571
426-450
7781
5857
451-475
8167
6130
476-500
8523
6415
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
371
66
VGF Cap for operations of RCS Routes / State RCS Routes in area other than Priority
Area(s)
Stage length
Cat 1/1A
Cat 2/3
1-50
554
664
51-75
1413
1232
76-100
1986
1611
101-125
2558
1997
126-150
3116
2376
151-175
3688
2755
176-200
4058
3039
201-225
4430
3324
226-250
4785
3598
251-275
5171
3822
276-300
5556
3928
301-325
5927
4023
326-350
6284
4128
351-375
6670
4234
376-400
7039
4328
401-425
7411
4434
426-450
7781
4540
451-475
8167
4635
476-500
8523
4740
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
372
67
VGF cap for helicopter operation:
S.No.
Flight Duration (in minutes)
VGF Cap per RCS Seat (in INR)
1.
00 10
-
2.
11 15
1,302
3.
16 20
2,963
4.
21 25
4,624
5.
26 30
6,274
6.
31 35
7,475
7.
36 40
8,630
8.
41 45
9,832
9.
46 50
9,832
10.
51 55
9,832
11.
56 60
9,832
12.
> 60
9,832
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
373
68
Annexure 4: Airfare Cap Indexation
Formula
Indexation of Airfare Cap(s) and Maximum Airfare(s) for fixed wing operation will be based on the
following formula based on methodology provided in Sections 2.3.6 and 2.3.7:




   
For helicopter operation:




   
Where,
Airfare Cap (Q2) is the Airfare Cap or the Maximum Airfare under a Selected Airline Operator
Agreement for the present Financial Quarter
Airfare Cap (Q1) is the Airfare Cap or the Maximum Airfare under a Selected Airline Operator
Agreement for the Base Financial Quarter
 is the change in Consumer Price Index Industrial Workers (in percentage) based on
figures published by the Government of India to be considered for determination of Airfare Cap
for the present Financial Quarter. It will be calculated as follows:



 







Where,

is the CPI-IW published by Government of India for month i of the present
Financial Quarter
i = 3 for the latest month for which CPI-IW has been published by Government of India at the
time of review of indexation
i = 2 for the month prior to the latest month for which CPI-IW has been published by
Government of India at the time of review of indexation and so on..
Where,

is the CPI-IW published by Government of India for month j of the Base
Financial Quarter
j = 3 for the latest month for which CPI-IW was published by Government of India in the first
month of the Base Financial Quarter, i.e., July 2018
j = 2 for the month prior to the latest month for which CPI-IW was published by Government of
India in the first month of the Base Financial Quarter, i.e., June 2018
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
374
69
and so on.
ΔATF is the change (in percentage) in aviation turbine fuel prices measured as per the formula
below:












Where,
m = No. of days in the period of three months corresponding to months i = 3, 2, and 1 in the
formula for  given above

= ATF price for the x
th
day in the period of three months corresponding to months i = 3,
2, and 1 in the formula for  given above
n = No. of days in the period of three months corresponding to months j= 3, 2, and 1 in the
formula for  given above

= ATF price for the y
th
day in the period of three months corresponding to months j =
3, 2, and 1 in the formula for  given above
For the purpose of above estimation, ATF prices (for domestic operations) prevailing across
four stations (Delhi (T3 terminal), Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai) of oil marketing company
HPCL - as published on its website
4
will be considered. In case the ATF price for a
particular date is not available on the website of oil marketing company, the ATF price for
the previous available date shall be considered.
ΔXCH is the change (in percentage) in the exchange rate between Indian Rupees and United
States Dollar, as per the formula below:














Where,
XCH = Exchange rate at which 1 USD can be converted into INR, i.e., XCH =
Number of INR in 1 USD
m = No. of days in the period of three months corresponding to months i = 3, 2, and 1
in the formula for  given above

= XCH for the b
th
day in the period of three months corresponding to months i = 3, 2,
and 1 in the formula for  given above
n = No. of days in the period of three months corresponding to months j= 3, 2, and 1 in the
formula for  given above
4
HPCL - http://www.hindustanpetroleum.com/hp-aviation-ATF-pricing-india-type2
FBIL - https://fbil.org.in/securities?op=referencerate&mq=o/
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
375
70

= XCH for the a
th
day in the period of three months corresponding to months j = 3, 2,
and 1 in the formula for  given above
For the purpose of above estimation, Exchange Rates as published by Financial Benchmark
India Pvt. Ltd. (FBIL) shall be taken into account. In case the exchange rate for a particular
date is not available on the FBIL website, the exchange rate for the previous available date
shall be considered.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
376
71
Annexure 5: VGF Cap Indexation Formula
Indexation of VGF Cap(s) will be based on the following:
For Fixed-wing aircraft;




 

      
 
For helicopters;




 

   
 
Where,
VGF (Q2) is the VGF Cap or VGF amount, as the case may be, applicable for the present
Financial Quarter
VGF (Q1) is the VGF Cap or VGF amount, as the case may be, applicable for the Base
Financial Quarter
Airfare Cap (Q2) is the Airfare Cap or the Maximum Airfare under a Selected Airline
Operator Agreement for the present Financial Quarter
Airfare Cap (Q1) is the Airfare Cap or the Maximum Airfare under a Selected Airline
Operator Agreement for the Base Financial Quarter
ΔCPI is the change in Consumer Price Index Industrial Workers (in percentage) based on
figures published by the Government of India to be considered for determination of VGF Cap
for the present Financial Quarter, calculated based on the formula provided in Section 2.3.8.
For avoidance of doubt, ΔCPI to be considered for determination of VGF Cap for a Financial
Quarter will be same as ΔCPI to be considered for determination of Airfare Cap for that
Financial Quarter.
ΔATF is the change (in percentage) in aviation turbine fuel prices measured as per the
formula mentioned above for the calculation of Airfare Cap
ΔXCH is the change (in percentage) in the exchange rate between Indian Rupees and United
States Dollar, as per the formula mentioned above for the calculation of Airfare Cap.
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
377
72
Annexure 6A: List of airports under
prioritization framework
S.No.
Name Of Airport
State/UT where the Airport/Airstrip is located
Priority Area
1
Shibpur
Andman & Nicobar(UT)
2
Rupsi
Assam
3
Kargil
Laddakh(UT)
Other Than Priority Area
4
Ambikapur
Chattisgarh
5
Bilaspur
Chattisgarh
6
Hissar
Haryana
7
Dumka
Jharkhand
8
Jeypore
Odisha
9
Utkela
Odisha
10
Neyveli
Tamil Nadu
11
Vellore
Tamil Nadu
12
Aligarh
Uttar Pradesh
13
Azamgarh
Uttar Pradesh
14
Bareilly
Uttar Pradesh
15
Chitrakoot
Uttar Pradesh
16
Moradabad
Uttar Pradesh
17
Muirpur(Corba)
Uttar Pradesh
18
Shravasti
Uttar Pradesh
19
Burnpur
West Bengal
20
Cooch Behar
West Bengal
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
378
73
Annexure 6B: List of select routes received
under previous rounds of UDAN connecting
airports mentioned in Annexure 6A
S No
Route
Stage
Length
in KM
Type of
Route
1
Port Blair-Shibpur
178
P RCS
2
Shibpur-Port Blair
178
P RCS
3
Jammu- Kargil
239
P RCS
4
Kargil-jammu
239
P RCS
5
Jammu- Kargil
239
P RCS
6
Kargil-jammu
239
P RCS
7
Bilaspur- Ambikapur
159
RCS
8
Ambikapur- Bilaspur
159
RCS
9
Bilaspur- Ambikapur
159
RCS
10
Ambikapur- Bilaspur
159
RCS
11
Hissar-Chandigarh
196
RCS
12
Hindan-Hissar
172
RCS
13
Jeypore -Bhubaneshwar
376
RCS
14
Bhubaneshwar-Jeypore
376
RCS
15
Bhubaneswar - Utkela
276
RCS
16
Utkela - Bhubaneswar
276
RCS
17
Utkela - Raipur
193
RCS
18
Raipur - Utkela
193
RCS
19
Chennai-Neyveli
169
RCS
20
Neyveli-Chennai
169
RCS
21
Bangalore-Vellore
157
RCS
22
Vellore-Bangalore
176
RCS
23
Vellore-Chennai
124
RCS
24
Chennai-Vellore
120
RCS
25
Lucknow-Aligarh
307
RCS
26
Aligarh-Lucknow
293
RCS
27
Lucknow-Azamgarh
230
RCS
28
Azamgarh-Lucknow
230
RCS
29
Hindan-Bareilly
207
RCS
30
Bareilly-Hindan
207
RCS
31
Lucknow-Bareilly
237
RCS
32
Bareilly-Lucknow
237
RCS
33
Lucknow-Chitrakoot
176
RCS
34
Chitrakoot -Lucknow
176
RCS
35
Lucknow-Moradabad
304
RCS
36
Moradabad-Lucknow
304
RCS
37
Lucknow-
370
RCS
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
379
74
S No
Route
Stage
Length
in KM
Type of
Route
Muirpur(Korba)
38
Muirpur(Korba)-
Lucknow
370
RCS
39
Lucknow-Shravasti
139
RCS
40
Shravasti-Lucknow
139
RCS
41
Kolkata-Burnpur
183
RCS
42
Burnpur-Kolkata
183
RCS
43
Kolkata-Cooch Behar
419
RCS
44
Cooch Behar- Kolkata
430
RCS
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
380
75
Annexure 7 List of routes proposed to be connected by State
Governments or other agencies
RCS
Unserved routes b/w two airports with at least one airport undeserved/ underserved
P RCS
RCS routes with one unserved/ underserved airport in priority area
PS RCS
Unserved routes between two served airports, suggested by State Govt./ ministry / agency with
either of the airport located in Priority Area(s)
*
Airline operator are requested for their due diligence regarding Suitability of aircraft at the airport.
Region
State
S No.
Routes
Stage
Length
in km
Route
Remarks
NER
Arunachal
Pradesh
1.
Tezpur - Tezu
409
P RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
2.
Tezu - Tezpur
409
P RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
3.
Passighat - Shillong
497
P RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
4.
Shillong - Passighat
497
P RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
5.
Jorhat-Passighat
196
P RCS
Cancelled route
6.
Passighat-Jorhat
196
P RCS
Cancelled route
7.
Tezu-Jorhat
241
P RCS
Cancelled route
8.
Jorhat-Tezu
241
P RCS
Cancelled route
Assam
9.
Tezpur - Lilabari
146
P RCS
Cancelled routes
10.
Lilabari - Tezpur
146
P RCS
Cancelled routes
11.
Rupsi - Kolkata
465
P RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
12.
Kolkata - Rupsi
465
P RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
381
76
Region
State
S No.
Routes
Stage
Length
in km
Route
Remarks
Manipur
13.
Silchar - Imphal
94
PS RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
14.
Imphal - Silchar
94
PS RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
Meghalaya
15.
Shillong Dimapur
282
P RCS
Cancelled routes
16.
Dimapur - Shillong
282
P RCS
Cancelled routes
17.
Shillong Agartala
239
P RCS
Cancelled routes
18.
Agartala - Shillong
239
P RCS
Cancelled routes
19.
Shillong Imphal
228
P RCS
Cancelled routes
20.
Imphal - Shillong
228
P RCS
Cancelled routes
21.
Shillong - Aizawl
259
P RCS
Cancelled routes
22.
Aizawl - Shillong
259
P RCS
Cancelled routes
23.
Shillong - Tezpur
196
P RCS
Cancelled routes
24.
Tezpur - Shillong
196
P RCS
Cancelled routes
25.
Shillong - Lilabari
391
P RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
26.
Lilabari - Shillong
391
P RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
27.
Shillong - Dibrugarh
446
P RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
28.
Dibrugarh - Shillong
446
P RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
29.
Shillong - Silchar
133
P RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
30.
Silchar - Shillong
133
P RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
Mizoram
31.
Aizawl - Tezpur
328
P RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
32.
Tezpur - Aizawl
333
P RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
382
77
Region
State
S No.
Routes
Stage
Length
in km
Route
Remarks
33.
Imphal - Aizawl
165
PS RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
34.
Aizawl - Imphal
165
PS RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
Tripura
35.
Agartala - Dibrugarh
571
PS RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
36.
Dibrugarh - Agartala
571
PS RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
37.
Agartala - Guwahati
251
PS RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
38.
Guwahati - Agartala
269
PS RCS
Routes requested by NEC/DoNER
ER
Andaman &
Nicobar
39.
Hutbay(W) - Port Blair
118
P RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
40.
Port Blair Hutbay
(W)
118
P RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
41.
Port Blair Car
Nicobar
276
P RCS
Cancelled routes
42.
Car Nicobar-Campbell
Bay
276
P RCS
Cancelled routes
43.
Campbell Bay-Car
Nicobar
267
P RCS
Cancelled routes
44.
Car Nicobar-Port Blair
267
P RCS
Cancelled routes
Jharkhand
45.
Patna-Jamshedpur
359
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
46.
Jamshedpur-Patna
362
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
Chhatisgarh
47.
Raipur - Ambikapur
255
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
48.
Ambikapur - Raipur
255
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
49.
Kolkata-Jamshedpur
233
RCS
Cancelled routes
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
383
78
Region
State
S No.
Routes
Stage
Length
in km
Route
Remarks
50.
Jamshedpur-Kolkata
233
RCS
Cancelled routes
51.
Kolkata-Rourkela
385
RCS
Cancelled routes
52.
Rourkela- Kolkata
385
RCS
Cancelled routes
53.
Chandigarh-Hissar
196
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
54.
Hissar-Hindan
166
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
55.
Hissar-Jammu
527
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
56.
Jammu-Hissar
512
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
57.
Hissar-Dehradun
388
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
58.
Dehradun-Hissar
382
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
Himachal
Pradesh
59.
Delhi-Shimla
313
RCS
Three years of route operation due
for completion on 26
th
of April,
2019
60.
Shimla-Delhi
313
RCS
Three years of route operation due
for completion on 26
th
of April,
2019
Jammu &
Kashmir
61.
Leh - Kargil
138
P RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
62.
Kargil Leh
138
P RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
63.
Thoise-Srinagar
253
P RCS
Cancelled routes
64.
Srinagar-Thoise
253
P RCS
Cancelled routes
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
384
79
Region
State
S No.
Routes
Stage
Length
in km
Route
Remarks
65.
Thoise-Chandigarh
468
P RCS
Cancelled routes
66.
Chandigarh-Thoise
468
P RCS
Cancelled routes
Madhya
Pradesh
67.
Bhopal-Rewa
417
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
68.
Rewa-Bhopal
417
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
Uttarakhand
69.
Chandigarh - Gauchar
231
P RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
70.
Gauchar - Chandigarh
231
P RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
71.
Dehradun - Gauchar
94
P RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
72.
Gauchar - Dehradun
94
P RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
73.
Dehradun -
Chinayalisaur
46
P RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
74.
Chinayalisaur -
Dehradun
46
P RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
75.
Gauchar -
Chinayalisaur
85
P RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
76.
Chinayalisaur -
Gauchar
85
P RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
77.
Dehradun - New Tehri
lake(W)
33
P RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
78.
New Tehri lake(W) -
Dehradun
33
P RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
79.
Chandigarh-
Pithoragarh
346
PS RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
80.
Pithoragarh-
346
PS RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
385
80
Region
State
S No.
Routes
Stage
Length
in km
Route
Remarks
Chandigarh
bidding
81.
Lucknow-Pithoragarh
387
PS RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
82.
Pithoragarh-Lucknow
387
PS RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
SR
Andhra Pradesh
83.
Chennai-Kurnool
391
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
84.
Kurnool - Chennai
389
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
85.
Prakasam Barrage(W)
Nagarjunasagar(W)
137
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
86.
Nagarjunasagar(W) -
Prakasam Barrage(W)
137
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
Pondicherry
87.
Pondicherry-Salem
191
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
88.
Salem-Pondicherry
191
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
Lakshadweep
89.
Agatti-Minicoy(W)
289
P RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
90.
Minicoy(W)-Agatti
289
P RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
91.
Agatti-Kavaratti
55
P RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
92.
Kavaratti -Agatti
55
P RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
WR
Diu & Daman
93.
Daman-Diu
203
RCS
Cancelled routes
94.
Diu-Daman
204
RCS
Cancelled routes
95.
Daman-Ahmedabad
298
RCS
Cancelled routes
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
386
81
Region
State
S No.
Routes
Stage
Length
in km
Route
Remarks
96.
Ahmedabad-Daman
314
RCS
Cancelled routes
WR
Maharashtra
97.
Sindhudurg -Pune
322
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
98.
Pune -Sindhudurg
322
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
99.
Sindhudurg -Nasik
522
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
100.
Nasik -Sindhudurg
509
RCS
Bid not received in 3.1 round of
bidding
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
387
82
Annexure 8: List of North Eastern Region
(NER) Routes
The list of North Eastern routes available as Priority RCS Routes for bidding under this
Scheme document is presented below:
S.No.
Route
1.
Guwahati-Tezpur
2.
Tezpur-Guwahati
3.
Guwahati-Passighat
4.
Passighat-Guwahati
484219/2019/Under Secretary(UB) Office-MOCA
388