In 2012, M Corporation recapitalizes and
creates a first and second class of 6% nonvot-
ing preferred stock, most of which is held by
Marshall and Lisa. In 2013, Marshall contributes
49% of his common stock in M to Y. Marshall's
contribution of M's common stock was substan-
tial and constitutes 90% of Y's total support for
2013. A combination of the facts and circum-
stances of the determining factors preclude
Marshall's contribution of M's common stock in
2013 from being excluded as an unusual grant
under Temporary Regulations section
1.509(a)-3T(c)(3) for purposes of determining
whether Y meets the one-third support test un-
der section 509(a)(2).
Example 2. M was organized in 2012 to
promote the appreciation of ballet in a particular
region of the United States. Its principal activi-
ties consist of erecting a theater for the perform-
ance of ballet and the organization and opera-
tion of a ballet company. M receives a
determination letter that it is an organization de-
scribed in section 501(c)(3) and that it is a pub-
lic charity described in section 509(a)(2). The
governing body of M consists of nine prominent
unrelated citizens residing in the region who
have either an expertise in ballet or a strong in-
terest in encouraging appreciation of the art
form.
In 2013, Z, a private foundation, proposes to
make a grant of $500,000 in cash to M to pro-
vide sufficient capital for M to commence its ac-
tivities. Although Albert Cedar, the creator of Z,
is one of the nine members of M's governing
body, was one of M's original founders, and
continues to lend his prestige to M's activities
and fundraising efforts, Albert doesn't, directly
or indirectly, exercise any control over M. By the
close of its first tax year, M also has received a
significant amount of support from a number of
smaller contributions and pledges from mem-
bers of the general public. M charges admission
to the ballet performances to the general public.
Although the support received in 2013 won't
impact M's status as a public charity for its first
5 tax years, it will be relevant to the determina-
tion of whether M meets the one-third support
test under section 509(a)(2) for the 2017 tax
year, using the computation period 2013
through 2017. Within the appropriate timeframe,
M may submit a request for a determination let-
ter that the $500,000 contribution from Z quali-
fies as an unusual grant.
Under the above circumstances, even
though Albert was a founder and member of the
governing body of M, M may exclude Z's contri-
bution of $500,000 in 2013 as an unusual grant
under Regulations section 1.509(a)-3T(c)(3) for
purposes of determining whether M meets the
one-third support test under section 509(a)(2)
for 2017.
Gifts, contributions, and grants distin-
guished from gross receipts. In determining
whether an organization normally receives more
than one-third of its support from permitted
sources, include all gifts, contributions, and
grants received from permitted sources in the
numerator of the support fraction in each tax
year. However, gross receipts from admissions,
sales of merchandise, performance of services,
or furnishing facilities, in an activity that isn't an
unrelated trade or business, are includible in the
numerator of the support fraction in any tax year
only to the extent that the amounts received
from any person or from any bureau or similar
agency of a governmental unit aren't more than
the greater of $5,000 or 1% of support.
Determinations of public support status.
An organization may request a determination
letter that it is described in section 509(a)(2).
This request is made on Form 1023 or Form
1023-EZ, or at such other time as the organiza-
tion believes it is described in section 509(a)(2).
The IRS may revoke the section 509(a)(2) de-
termination letter if, upon examination, the or-
ganization has not met the requirements. The
IRS may also revoke the section 509(a)(2) de-
termination letter if the organization’s applica-
tion for determination contained an omission or
inaccurate material information.
Reliance by grantors or contributors.
Grantors or contributors may rely on a determi-
nation that an organization is described in sec-
tion 509(a)(2) until notice of change of status of
the organization is made to the public (such as
by publication in the Internal Revenue Bulletin,
or Tax-Exempt Organization Search, either of
which can be searched at IRS.gov). See Rev.
Proc. 2018-32, 2018-23 I.R.B. 739. Tax-Exempt
Organization Search is only available online at
Tax-Exempt Organization Search. However, this
won't apply if the grantor or contributor was re-
sponsible for, or aware of, the act or failure to
act that resulted in the organization's loss of
classification as a publicly supported organiza-
tion.
Gifts and contributions. Any payment of
money or transfer of property without adequate
consideration is considered a gift or contribu-
tion. When payment is made or property is
transferred as consideration for admissions,
sales of merchandise, performance of services,
or furnishing facilities to the donor, the status of
the payment or transfer under section 170(c)
determines whether and to what extent the pay-
ment or transfer is a gift or contribution as dis-
tinguished from gross receipts from related ac-
tivities.
The amount includible in computing support
from gifts, grants, or contributions of property or
use of property is the fair market or rental value
of the property at the date of the gift or contribu-
tion.
Example. P is a local agricultural club and
is an organization described in section 501(c)
(3). It makes awards at its annual fair for out-
standing specimens of produce and livestock to
encourage interest and proficiency by young
people in farming and raising livestock. Most of
these awards are cash or other property dona-
ted by local businessmen. When the awards are
made, the donors are given recognition for their
donations by being identified as the donor of
the award. The recognition given to donors is
merely incidental to the making of the award to
worthy youngsters. For these reasons, the don-
ations are contributions. The amount includible
in computing support is equal to the cash con-
tributed or the fair market value of other prop-
erty on the dates contributed.
Grants. Grants often contain certain terms
and conditions imposed by the grantor. Be-
cause of the imposition of terms and conditions,
the frequent similarity of public purposes of
grantor and grantee, and the possibility of bene-
fit to the grantor, amounts received as grants for
carrying on exempt activities are sometimes dif-
ficult to distinguish from amounts received as
gross receipts from carrying on exempt activi-
ties.
In distinguishing the term gross receipts
from the term grants, the term gross receipts
means amounts received from an activity that
isn't an unrelated trade or business, if a specific
service, facility, or product is provided to serve
the direct and immediate needs of the payor
rather than primarily to confer a direct benefit on
the general public. In general, payments made
primarily to enable the payor to realize or re-
ceive some economic or physical benefit as a
result of the service, facility, or product obtained
will be treated as gross receipts by the payee.
For example, a profit-making organization,
primarily for its own betterment, contracts with a
nonprofit organization for a service from that or-
ganization. Any payments received by the non-
profit organization (whether from the profit-mak-
ing organization or from another nonprofit) for
similar services are primarily for the benefit of
the payor and are therefore gross receipts,
rather than grants.
Research leading to the development of tan-
gible products for the use or benefit of a payor
generally will be treated as a service provided
to serve the direct and immediate needs of the
payor, while basic research or studies carried
on in the physical or social sciences generally
will be treated as primarily to confer a direct
benefit upon the general public.
Medicare and Medicaid payments are gross
receipts from the exercise or performance of an
exempt function. The individual patient, not a
governmental unit, actually controls the ultimate
recipient of these payments. Therefore, Medi-
care and Medicaid receipts for services provi-
ded to each patient are included as gross re-
ceipts to the extent they aren't more than the
greater of $5,000 or 1% of the organization's to-
tal support for the tax year.
Membership fees distinguished from gross
receipts. The fact that a membership organiza-
tion provides services, admissions, facilities, or
merchandise to its members as part of its over-
all activities won't, in itself, result in the classifi-
cation of fees received from members as gross
receipts subject to the $5,000 or 1% limit rather
than membership fees. However, if an organiza-
tion uses membership fees as a means of sell-
ing admissions, merchandise, services, or the
use of facilities to members of the general pub-
lic who have no common goal or interest (other
than the desire to buy the admissions, mer-
chandise, services, or use of facilities), the fees
aren't membership fees but are gross receipts.
On the other hand, to the extent the basic
purpose of the payment is to provide support for
the organization rather than to buy admissions,
merchandise, services, or the use of facilities,
the payment is a membership fee.
Bureau defined. The term bureau or similar
agency of a governmental unit for determining
amounts subject to the $5,000 or 1% limit
Page 40 of 76 Fileid: … ons/p557/202401/a/xml/cycle01/source 12:10 - 6-Feb-2024
The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing.
40 Chapter 3 Section 501(c)(3) Organizations Publication 557 (1-2024)