2020] Blue Lives Matter Versus Black Lives Matter 487
officers.
These practices diminish the likelihood of accountability for
abusive police behavior, which parallels the penal harm philosophy in the
realm of corrections.
Namely, this phenomenon involves police officers—
like corrections officers—improperly inflicting harm
to punish those who
disobey, fail to show respect, violate officers’ expectations about behavior,
or, even worse, simply are members of a demographic group against which
the officers harbor animus.
Such punishment can include unjustified stop-
and-frisk searches, automobile searches, issuance of traffic tickets and other
citations, use of force, and arrests.
When done to punish or inflict harm,
these actions by police officers are contrary to law.
Officers are not
authorized to mete out discretionary punishments.
Rather, in the criminal
justice system, judges impose punishment and the government’s corrections
system carries it out only after an individual is convicted after a criminal
proceeding that respects due process and constitutional rights.
There is abundant evidence that African-Americans disproportionately
experience the harm inflicted through the improper and abusive exercise of
. Sam Levin, Killed by Police, Then Vilified: How America’s Prosecutors Blame Victims,
GUARDIAN (Mar. 21, 2019), https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/mar/20/us-police-killings-
district-attorney-prosecutor-
reports?utm_term=RWRpdG9yaWFsX1VTTW9ybmluZ0JyaWVmaW5nLTE5MDMyMQ%3D%3D&u
tm_source=esp&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=USMorningBriefing&CMP=usbriefing_email.
. See TODD. R. CLEAR, HARM IN AMERICAN PENOLOGY 32 (1994) (“The pedagogical
technique they use is to harm, intentionally. . . . The offender gets the unintended lesson: harm and
violence are acceptable if you have the power to get away with it.”).
. See Rachel Feinstein, A Qualitative Analysis of Police Interactions and Disproportionate
Minority Contact, 13 J. ETHNICITY CRIM. JUST. 159, 171–73 (2015) (noting instances of officers using
unjustified force against minority children).
. See, e.g., U.S. DEP’T OF JUSTICE, THE FERGUSON REPORT 47 (The New Press 2015) (“Many
officers are quick to escalate encounters with subjects they perceive to be disobeying their orders or
resisting arrest. . . . Some incidents of excessive force result from stops or arrests that have no basis in
law. Others are punitive and retaliatory.”).
. See id. at 28–30, 36–37, 42–47 (providing numerous examples of police using unjustified
force or taking discriminatory actions).
. For example, police officers’ legitimate actions are based on authority derived from judicial
interpretations of constitutional provisions and statutes, as well as departmental policies. COLE, SMITH &
DEJONG, supra note 58, at 188, 231. Thus, warrantless searches without reasonable suspicion, arrests
without probable cause, traffic stops without proper justification, and applications of force beyond those
permitted by policy and judicial interpretations of law are all improper and violate citizens’ legal
protections. See id. at 326–33, 344–83 (describing requirements governing the legal exercise of police
authority to conduct searches, make arrests, and use force).
. See id. at 218–19 (defining the functions and goals of police to include order maintenance,
investigation, and apprehension of criminal law violators, and various service activities—they do not
include decisions about the formal imposition of punishment by the criminal justice system).
. Id. In addition to the imposition of punishment being outside the scope of authorized police
functions and goals, the U.S. Supreme Court defines the constitutional term “punishments” in the Eighth
Amendment as limited to post-conviction treatment of individuals by the criminal justice system.
Ingraham v. Wright, 430 U.S. 651, 664 (1977).