Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 1 of

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE: APPLE INC. DEVICE

PERFORMANCE LITIGATION

CASE NO. 5:18-m

-02827-EJD

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

This Document Relates To:

ALL ACTIONS.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

The Parties, by and through their respective counsel, in consideration for and subject to the

promises, terms, and conditions contained in this Settlement Agreement, hereby warrant, represent,

acknowledge, covenant, stipulate and agree, subject to Court approval pursuant to Rule 23 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as follows:

1. DEFINITIONS

As used herein, the following terms have the meanings set forth below:

1.1 “Actions” means the MDL Action and the JCCP Action, collectively; and each term is

defined as follows:

1.1.1 “JCCP Action” means the California state lawsuits that were coordinated in San

Francisco Superior Court pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure

§ 404.1, and consolidated into Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding

(JCCP) No. 4976. The JCCP Action shall also include any additional California

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 1 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

state actions that have been or may be filed and/or coordinated with the JCCP

Action.

1.1.2 “MDL Action” means the actions consolidated by the Judicial Panel on

Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) in the Northern District of California pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, into proceedings captioned In re Apple Inc. Device

Performance Litigation, No. 18-md-2827-EJD. The MDL Action shall include

the actions identified in Appendix A, as well as include any and all additional

federal actions that have been or may be filed, related to, and/or consolidated

into the MDL Action, including but not limited to Rodriguez v. Apple Inc.,

No. 18-3989-EJD (N.D. Cal. filed July 2, 2018), and other individually filed

actions before and after JPML centralization in this District.

1.2 “Apple” means Apple Inc.

1.3 “Approved Claims” means those Claims which are approved by the Settlement

Administrator for payment.

1.4 “Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses” means any award of attorneys’ fees and expenses.

1.5 “Claim Form” means the proof of claim and release form(s) substantially in the form

attached as Exhibit A.

1.6 “Claim” means any claim submitted by a Settlement Class Member.

1.7 “Claims Period” means the period between the Notice Date until the deadline set forth

in paragraph 6.4.

1.8 “Class Counsel” means the law firms of Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP and Kaplan

Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, who have any and all authority and capacity necessary to execute this

Settlement Agreement and bind all of the Named Plaintiffs who have not personally signed this

Settlement Agreement, as if each of those individuals had personally executed this Settlement

Agreement.

1.9 “Class Notice” means the Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action,

substantially in the form attached as Exhibit B.

1.10 “Court” means the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 2 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

1.11 “Defense Counsel” means the law firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.

1.12 “Effective Date” shall mean the first day after which all of the following events and

conditions of this Settlement Agreement have been met or occurred:

a) All non-U.S. Named Plaintiffs have personally executed this Settlement

Agreement;

b) Class Counsel have confirmed in writing that they have used best efforts to have

all the remaining Named Plaintiffs personally execute this Settlement

Agreement;

c) Apple, Class Counsel, JCCP Counsel, and Defense Counsel have executed this

Settlement Agreement;

d) The Court has conditionally certified the Settlement Class, preliminarily

approved the Settlement, and approved notice to the Settlement Class;

e) The time period for members of the Settlement Class to exclude themselves has

expired;

f) The Settlement Administrator has delivered the spreadsheet(s) and information

to Defense Counsel and Class Counsel as specified in paragraphs 6.9 and 6.10;

g) All disputed Claims have been resolved;

h) The Court has entered the Final Approval Order and Final Judgment;

i) The time for appeal or writ of the Final Approval Order and Final Judgment has

expired or, if an appeal and/or petition for review is taken and the Settlement is

affirmed, the time period during which further petition for hearing, appeal, or

writ of certiorari can be taken has expired;

j) The time for appeal or writ of any order regarding Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses

and/or Named Plaintiff Service Awards has expired or, if an appeal and/or

petition for review is taken and the order is affirmed, the time period during

which further petition for hearing, appeal, or writ of certiorari can be taken has

expired;

k) The JCCP Action is dismissed with prejudice and a final judgment is entered;

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 3 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

and

l) The time for appeal or writ of the final judgment in the JCCP Action has expired

or, if an appeal and/or petition for review is taken and the dismissal is affirmed,

the time period during which further petition for hearing, appeal, or writ of

certiorari can be taken has expired.

1.13 “Final Approval Order and Final Judgment” means the final approval order and

judgment dismissing and closing the MDL Action in the form attached as Exhibits E and F.

1.14 “Final Hearing” means the hearing(s) held by the Court to consider and determine

whether the requirements for certification of the Settlement Class have been met and whether the

Settlement should be approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate; whether Class Counsel’s Attorneys’

Fees and Expenses and/or Named Plaintiff Service Awards should be approved; and whether the final

judgment approving the Settlement and dismissing the Actions on the merits and with prejudice should

be entered. The Final Hearing may, from time to time and without further notice to the Settlement

Class (except those who have filed timely and valid objections and requested to speak at the Final

Hearing), be continued or adjourned by order of the Court.

1.15 “JCCP Counsel” means the attorneys with The Brandi Law Firm and The Law Offices

of Andrew J. Brown appointed as Co-Lead Counsel in the JCCP Action.

1.16 “iPhone” means Apple iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, 7, 7 Plus, and SE devices.

1.17 “Maximum Class Settlement Amount” means Five Hundred Million U.S. Dollars

($500,000,000.00), less any amounts paid to the Named Plaintiffs as Service Awards.

1.18 “MDL Counsel” means the attorneys appointed as interim counsel in the MDL Action.

1.19 “Minimum Class Settlement Amount” means Three Hundred Ten Million U.S. Dollars

($310,000,000.00). Under no circumstances shall any portion of the Minimum Class Settlement

Amount revert to Apple.

1.20 “Named Plaintiffs” means all individuals identified in Appendix B. Notwithstanding

the foregoing, the “Named Plaintiffs” shall further exclude any individual who requests exclusion from

the Settlement Class and/or submits an objection to the Settlement.

1.21 “Named Plaintiff Service Awards” means the service awards for the Named Plaintiffs,

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 4 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

as set forth in paragraph 8.4.

1.22 “Notice Date” means seventy-five (75) days after the deadline for the Settlement

Administrator to receive the names, email addresses, mailing addresses, and serial numbers for the

members of the Settlement Class as provided in paragraph 6.2.2.

1.23 “Parties” means Apple and the Named Plaintiffs.

1.24 “Plaintiffs’ Counsel” means Class Counsel, MDL Counsel, JCCP Counsel, and all of

the attorneys, associates, law firms, and legal representatives, who have represented and/or purport to

represent any of the Named Plaintiffs and/or who brought any of the Actions, including but not limited

to all of the attorneys and firms identified in Appendix C.

1.25 “Preliminary Approval Order” means the order preliminarily approving the Settlement,

providing for notice to the Settlement Class, and other related matters in the form attached as Exhibit D.

1.26 “Released Parties” means (a) Apple and its past, present, and future parents,

subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, joint ventures, licensees, franchisees, and any other legal entities,

whether foreign or domestic, that are owned or controlled by Apple; and (b) the past, present, and future

shareholders, officers, directors, members, agents, employees, independent contractors, consultants,

administrators, representatives, fiduciaries, insurers, predecessors, successors, and assigns of the

entities in part (a) of this paragraph.

1.27 “Residual” means the difference between the value of the Approved Claims and the

Minimum Settlement Amount, as set forth in paragraph 5.3.

1.28 “Settlement” and “Settlement Agreement” mean the settlement described in this

Stipulation of Settlement.

1.29 “Settlement Administrator” means Angeion Group, which shall provide settlement

notice and administration services pursuant to the terms of this Settlement Agreement.

1.30 “Settlement Administration Protocol” means the protocol attached as Exhibit G.

1.31 “Settlement Class Member” means and includes every member of the Settlement Class

who does not validly and timely request exclusion from the Settlement Class.

1.32 “Settlement Class” means all former or current U.S. owners of iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s

Plus, 7, 7 Plus, and SE devices running iOS 10.2.1 or later (for iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, and SE

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 5 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

devices) or iOS 11.2 or later (for iPhone 7 and 7 Plus devices), and who ran these iOS versions before

December 21, 2017. For purposes of this definition, “U.S. owners” shall include individuals who

owned, purchased, leased, or otherwise received an eligible device, and individuals who otherwise used

an eligible device for personal, work, or any other purposes. An individual qualifies as a “U.S. owner”

if his or her device was shipped to the United States, its territories, and/or its possessions. The

Settlement Class shall not include iPhone owners who are domiciled outside of the United States, its

territories, and/or its possessions. Additionally, excluded from the Settlement Class are (a) directors,

officers, and employees of Apple or its subsidiaries and affiliated companies, as well as Apple’s legal

representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns, (b) the Court, the Court staff, as well as any appellate

court to which this matter is ever assigned and its staff, (c) any of the individuals identified in paragraph

1.36, as well as their legal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns, (d) Defense Counsel, as well

as their immediate family members, legal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns, and (e) any

other individuals whose claims already have been adjudicated to a final judgment.

1.33 “Settlement Funds” means funds sufficient to pay the Approved Claims and the Named

Plaintiff Service Awards.

1.34 “Settlement Website” means an Internet website that the Settlement Administrator shall

establish to inform the Settlement Class of the terms of this Settlement, their rights, dates, deadlines,

and related information.

1.35 “Summary Notice” means the Summary Notice of Settlement, substantially in the form

attached as Exhibit C.

1.36 Notwithstanding the foregoing definitions and terms, the following individuals and

former plaintiffs are not Settlement Class Members, because their claims have been dismissed with

prejudice: Meghan Mesloh; Aja Johnson; and Quinn Lewis. These individuals shall have no right to

any payment(s) pursuant to this Settlement.

2. RECITALS

A. Between December 2017 and June 2018, multiple class action complaints were filed

against Apple in the United States District Courts for the Northern District of Alabama, the Central

District of California, the Northern District of California, the Southern District of California, the

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 6 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

District of Columbia, the Southern District of Florida, the Southern District of Georgia, the Northern

District of Illinois, the Southern District of Illinois, the Eastern District of Louisiana, the Eastern

District of Missouri, the Western District of Missouri, the Southern District of Mississippi, the District

of New Jersey, the Eastern District of New York, the Southern District of New York, the Northern

District of Ohio, the Southern District of Ohio, the District of South Carolina, and the Eastern District

of Texas.

Beginning on April 4, 2018, these actions were consolidated by the JPML in the Northern

District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, into the MDL Action, captioned In re Apple Inc.

Device Performance Litigation, No. 18-md-2827-EJD. A list of these actions that have been

consolidated into the MDL Action is attached hereto as Appendix A.

B. After their appointment, Class Counsel filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint in the

MDL Action on July 2, 2018. The Consolidated Amended Complaint contained allegations concerning

unexpected power-offs and a performance management feature that Apple introduced in iOS 10.2.1

and iOS 11.2 to avoid them. The Consolidated Amended Complaint identified the “Devices” at issue

in the case as including “the iPhone 5, iPhone 5s, iPhone 5c, iPhone SE, iPhone 6, iPhone 6s, iPhone

6 Plus, iPhone 6s Plus, iPhone 7, [and] iPhone 7 Plus” and purported to seek certification of a putative

class of “[a]ll purchasers, owners, users or lessees” of the devices in the United States and in 40 foreign

countries. The Consolidated Amended Complaint alleged that these devices were “defective” and

brought claims against Apple for fraud, breach of contractual obligations, violation of consumer

protection laws, “trespass to chattels,” and alleged violations of the California Computer Data Access

and Fraud Act (CDAFA) and the federal Computer Fraud Abuse Act (CFAA).

C. On October 1, 2018, the Court entered an order granting in part and denying in part

Apple’s motion to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint, which dismissed the fraudulent

misrepresentation and omission-based claims without prejudice.

D. Class Counsel filed a Second Consolidated Amended Complaint on November 30,

2018, which brought the same legal claims under the same consumer protection laws, as well as

asserting claims for “trespass to chattels” and for alleged violations of the CDAFA and CFAA.

The MDL Action shall also include any additional federal actions that have been or may be filed,

related to, and/or consolidated into the MDL Action.

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 7 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

E. The Court issued another order granting in part and denying in part Apple’s motion to

dismiss the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint on April 22, 2019. In its order, the Court

dismissed, with prejudice, the claims that the iPhones were “defective,” all claims based on

iPhone 5/5c/5s devices, and all common law and statutory fraud claims (whether based on a theory of

affirmative misrepresentation or omission). The Court also dismissed, without prejudice, claims

related to the Named Plaintiffs’ theory that Apple had breached contractual obligations. However, the

Court did not dismiss the claims for trespass to chattels and under the CDAFA and CFAA. The Named

Plaintiffs did not amend their complaint to try to replead the contract claims, and they instead elected

to stand on their Second Consolidated Amended Complaint.

F. The Parties engaged in extensive discovery in the MDL and JCCP Actions. Class

Counsel served more than 170 document requests on Apple, in response to which Apple produced more

than 7 million pages of documents. Apple also served written discovery and document requests to each

of the Named Plaintiffs, who produced more than 6,000 pages of documents. The Parties also deposed

19 individuals, including ten Apple witnesses and nine Named Plaintiffs. The Parties also litigated

several discovery motions before the Hon. Rebecca Westerfield (Ret.).

G. Between December 2017 and June 2018, four class action complaints were filed against

Apple in California state courts for the counties of Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa

Clara. The Judicial Council coordinated these actions in the San Francisco Superior Court pursuant to

California Code of Civil Procedure § 404.1, and consolidated them into proceedings captioned In re

Apple OS Cases, JCCP No. 4976. A Consolidated Master Complaint was filed in the JCCP Action on

January 22, 2019, which brought claims under California’s Unfair Competition Law and for “trespass

to chattels” on behalf of “all California citizens who purchased, owned, or leased” these devices. On

June 20, 2019, the Superior Court entered an order sustaining in part and overruling in part Apple’s

demurrer to the Consolidated Master Complaint, holding that the Consolidated Master Complaint did

not state an affirmative misrepresentation or omissions-based claim, but declined to sustain Apple’s

demurrer to the “trespass to chattels” claim. The JCCP Plaintiffs filed their First Amended

Consolidated Master Complaint on August 5, 2019, which again asserted fraud, consumer protection,

and trespass to chattels claims concerning the same devices. At the time of this Settlement, Apple’s

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 8 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

demurrer to the First Amended Consolidated Master Complaint in the JCCP Action was fully briefed

and awaiting decision.

H. The Parties engaged in extensive, arm’s-length negotiations over the course of many

months, including by engaging in several all-day, in-person mediation sessions and numerous

additional discussions with the Hon. Layn R. Phillips (Ret.) of Phillips ADR, a former United States

District Court Judge and one of the most experienced mediators in the United States. As a result of

these arm’s-length negotiations, the Parties reached the Settlement set forth in this Settlement

Agreement, which memorializes the Parties’ agreement and rulings by the Hon. Layn R. Phillips (Ret.)

regarding certain disputed settlement terms. The Parties intend that this Settlement completely resolve

any and all claims that were, or could have been, asserted in the Actions on behalf of individuals in the

United States, as well as any non-U.S.-based Named Plaintiffs who filed claims in the United States.

I. Apple vigorously disputes the claims alleged in the Actions and is entering into this

Settlement to avoid burdensome and costly litigation. The Settlement is not an admission of

wrongdoing, fault, liability, or damage of any kind. Among other things, Apple disputes that Plaintiffs’

dismissed and remaining claims have merit, that Plaintiffs will be able to certify any class in these

actions for litigation purposes, that Plaintiffs are entitled to pursue claims on behalf of non-U.S.

claimants, that California law would apply nationwide (or beyond U.S. borders), and that Plaintiffs and

the putative class would be entitled to any relief. Without admitting any of the allegations made in the

Actions or any liability whatsoever, Apple is willing to enter into this Settlement solely in order to

eliminate the burdens, distractions, expense and uncertainty of protracted litigation and in order to

obtain the releases and final judgment contemplated by this Settlement.

J. Class Counsel and the Named Plaintiffs believe that the claims asserted in the Actions

have merit and have examined and considered the benefits to be obtained under this Settlement, the

risks associated with the continued prosecution of this complex and potentially time-consuming

litigation, and the likelihood of ultimate success on the merits, and have concluded that the Settlement

is fair, adequate, reasonable and in the best interests of the Settlement Class.

K. The Parties desire to settle the Actions in their entirety with respect to all potential

claims arising out of the same facts alleged in the complaints filed in each of the Actions. The Parties

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 9 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

intend this Settlement Agreement to bind Apple, the Named Plaintiffs, and all other Settlement Class

Members.

3. CONFIDENTIALITY

3.1 The Parties must comply with all portions of the Stipulated Protective Order (Dkt. 224

in the MDL Action) and the Protective Order Regarding the Disclosure and Use of Discovery Materials

(executed March 22, 2019 in the JCCP Action) (collectively, the “Protective Order”), and all orders

construing the Protective Order, including but not limited to: (i) the Court’s Order re Motion for

Sanctions (Dkt. 350); (ii) Section 8.1, which limits the use of Protected Material (as defined in the

Protective Order) to prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle the Actions, and prohibits the use

of Protected Material for any other purpose, including, without limitation, in any other litigation, or for

any business or competitive function; and (iii) Section 15, which requires the return, destruction, or

deletion of Protected Material (as defined in the Protective Order) within 60 days of the final disposition

of the Actions.

3.2 This Settlement Agreement and its terms, including the fact of the proposed Settlement,

shall remain completely confidential until all documents are executed and the Motion for Preliminary

Approval is filed with the Court. Pending the filing of that Motion, Plaintiffs’ Counsel may disclose

this Settlement Agreement and its terms to their respective clients who brought any of the actions in

the MDL Action, who will also maintain the complete confidentiality of this Settlement Agreement

and its terms, including the fact of the proposed Settlement.

3.3 If, through the actions of any of the Parties or their counsel, this Settlement Agreement

and the proposed Settlement become public before the Motion for Preliminary Approval is filed with

the Court, the responsible Party or counsel shall pay liquidated damages of Twenty-Five Thousand

U.S. Dollars ($25,000.00) to the non-responsible Party.

4. CERTIFICATION OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASS

4.1 The Parties stipulate and agree that, subject to Court approval, the Settlement Class

should be conditionally certified pursuant to Rule 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

solely for purposes of the Settlement embodied in this Settlement Agreement. If, for any reason, this

Settlement Agreement is not approved by the Court, the stipulation for certification and all of the

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 10 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

agreements contained herein shall be considered null and void as provided in paragraph 7.5.

4.2 Apple does not consent to certification of the Settlement Class (or to the propriety of

class treatment) for any purpose other than to effectuate this Settlement. Apple’s agreement to

provisional certification does not constitute an admission of wrongdoing, fault, liability, or damage of

any kind, or that any class certification would be appropriate for litigation or any other purpose other

than to effectuate this Settlement.

4.3 If for any reason the Effective Date does not occur or this Settlement Agreement is

terminated, disapproved by any court (including any appellate court), or not consummated for any

reason, the order certifying the Settlement Class for purposes of effectuating the Settlement (and all

preliminary and final findings regarding that class certification order) shall be automatically vacated

upon notice of the same to the Court. The Actions shall then proceed as though the Settlement Class

had never been certified pursuant to this Settlement Agreement and such findings had never been made,

and the Actions shall return to their procedural postures on the date this Settlement Agreement was

signed. Additionally, the Parties and their counsel shall not refer to or invoke the vacated findings

and/or order relating to class settlement or Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure if this

Settlement Agreement is not consummated and the Actions are later litigated and contested by Apple

under Rule 23 or any equivalent statute or rule.

5. SETTLEMENT CONSIDERATION

5.1 Cash Payment to Settlement Class Members. In consideration of the releases and

dismissals set forth in this Settlement Agreement, subject to Court approval, and subject to the other

terms and conditions of this Settlement Agreement (including the Maximum Class Settlement Amount

and Minimum Class Settlement Amount), Settlement Class Members who meet the requirements and

follow the procedures set forth in paragraphs 6.3 to 6.7 shall be sent Twenty-Five U.S. Dollars ($25.00)

for each iPhone owned. The actual amount of payment may differ, depending on the amount of any

Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses, Named Plaintiff Service Awards, notice expenses, and whether the

aggregate value of Approved Claims reaches the Minimum Class Settlement Amount or Maximum

Class Settlement Amount, as set forth in paragraphs 5.2 to 5.3.3 below. Additionally, if multiple

Settlement Class Members submit Claims pertaining to the same eligible device, the payment amount

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 11 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

for that device shall be divided equally among those submitting Approved Claims regarding that

particular device.

5.2 Maximum Class Settlement Amount. Notwithstanding paragraph 5.1, in no event

shall the aggregate cash payment to the Settlement Class Members exceed the Maximum Class

Settlement Amount. If the number of iPhone devices identified in Approved Claims submitted by

Settlement Class Members, multiplied by Twenty-Five U.S. Dollars ($25.00), exceeds the Maximum

Class Settlement Amount, then the cash payment for each iPhone identified in the Approved Claims

shall be reduced on a pro rata basis to ensure the aggregate cash payment to Settlement Class Members

does not exceed the Maximum Class Settlement Amount.

5.3 Minimum Class Settlement Amount. Notwithstanding paragraph 5.1, if payment of

Twenty-Five U.S. Dollars ($25.00) for each iPhone device identified in Approved Claims submitted

by Settlement Class Members, the payment of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses the Court awards to Class

Counsel (as contemplated in paragraph 8.1), and the payment of the Named Plaintiff Service Awards

would not reach the Minimum Class Settlement Amount, the Residual shall be allocated in order of

priority as follows:

5.3.1 The Residual shall be used to pay the costs of settlement notice and

administration (as contemplated in paragraph 6.1) up to the amount of Twelve Million Seven-Hundred-

Fifty Thousand U.S. Dollars ($12,750,000.00), plus any postage expense incurred after the $12,750,000

cap has been reached.

5.3.2 If there are funds remaining in the Residual after paying the costs of settlement

notice and administration (as contemplated in paragraph 5.3.1), then the cash payment for each

Approved Claim shall be increased on a pro rata basis until the aggregate value of Approved Claims,

Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses, and costs of settlement notice and administration equal the Minimum

Class Settlement Amount. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the pro rata payment for each Approved

Claim per applicable device shall not exceed Five Hundred U.S. Dollars ($500.00).

5.3.3 If the total amount calculated in paragraph 5.3.2 does not reach the Minimum

Class Settlement Amount following the pro rata adjustment described therein, then the Parties shall

confer on the distribution of the remaining amount, with resolution subject to Court approval.

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 12 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

6. NOTICE AND SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION

6.1 Neutral Settlement Administrator. Subject to Court approval, the Settlement

Administrator shall provide settlement notice and administration services, in accordance with the terms

of this Settlement Agreement and the Settlement Administration Protocol. Except as provided in

paragraph 5.3.1, Apple shall pay reasonable costs of notice and the costs of administering the

Settlement.

6.2 Notice Procedures. The Parties agree to the following forms and methods of notice to

the Settlement Class:

6.2.1 A copy of the Class Notice, together with the Claim Form, the Settlement, the

motions for Final Approval Order and Final Judgment, Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses, and Named

Plaintiff Service Awards, and Court orders pertaining to the Settlement, shall be posted and available

for download on the Settlement Website maintained by the Settlement Administrator. The information

shall remain available on the Settlement Website until the Effective Date.

6.2.2 The Settlement Administrator shall email a copy of the Summary Notice to the

email address of record on the Apple ID account of the members of the Settlement Class. The electronic

version of the Summary Notice shall contain a direct link to the Settlement Website and the instructions

for the Claim Form. To facilitate the distribution of the Summary Notice, within thirty (30) days of

the Court’s entry of the Preliminary Approval Order, Apple shall provide the Settlement Administrator

with the names, email addresses, mailing addresses, and serial numbers for the members of the

Settlement Class. If Apple does not have a valid email address for a member of the Settlement Class,

the Settlement Administrator shall mail a copy of the Summary Notice via postcard to that member of

the Settlement Class. An email address is not considered valid if it results in a hard bounce back.

6.2.3 The names, email addresses, mailing addresses, and serial numbers are personal

information about the members of the Settlement Class and shall be provided to the Settlement

Administrator solely for the purposes of providing notice, processing requests for exclusion, and

administering payment. The Settlement Administrator shall execute the Stipulated Protective Order

(Dkt. 224), treat all such information as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” and take all

reasonable steps to ensure that all such information is used solely for the purpose of administering this

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 13 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

Settlement.

6.2.4 The Settlement Administrator shall complete the email notice (and, if applicable,

the notice via postcard) by the Notice Date. If, despite using best efforts, the Settlement Administrator

is unable to complete the notice by the Notice Date, the Settlement Administrator shall inform the

Parties of the status of the notice, and notify the Parties when the notice has been completed.

6.2.5 In addition to the notice required by the Court, the Parties may jointly agree to

provide additional notice to the members of the Settlement Class, although Class Counsel and Apple

must approve any additional notice.

6.2.6 If this notice plan is not approved, or is modified in a material way by the Court,

Apple shall have the right to unilaterally terminate the Settlement.

6.3 Claim Form. Settlement Class Members who wish to receive a cash payment will be

required to submit a Claim Form. The Claim Form shall, among other things, require the Settlement

Class Member to certify, under penalty of perjury, that (a) their eligible iPhone device ran iOS 10.2.1

or later (for iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, and SE devices) or iOS 11.2 or later (for iPhone 7 and 7 Plus

devices) before December 21, 2017; and (b) they experienced diminished performance on the eligible

device when running iOS 10.2.1 or iOS 11.2 before December 21, 2017. The Claim Forms shall be

submitted to the Settlement Administrator via U.S. mail or electronically through the Settlement

Website.

6.4 Claims Period. To be valid, Claim Forms, requests to opt out, and objections must be

received by the Settlement Administrator within forty-five (45) days from the Notice Date.

6.5 Process for Opting Out of Settlement. The Class Notice shall provide a procedure

whereby members of the Settlement Class may exclude themselves from the Settlement. The members

of the Settlement Class shall have no less than forty-five (45) days following the Notice Date to exclude

themselves. Any member of the Settlement Class who does not timely and validly request exclusion

shall be a Settlement Class Member and shall be bound by the terms of this Settlement. As soon as

practicable after the opt-out deadline, the Settlement Administrator shall provide the Court with a list

of the individuals who timely and validly requested exclusion from the Settlement.

6.6 Process for Objections. The Class Notice shall provide a procedure whereby

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 14 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

Settlement Class Members may object to the Settlement. Objections shall be filed with the Court and

served on Class Counsel and Defense Counsel within forty-five (45) days from the Notice Date. Any

objection shall, at a minimum, require the individual to provide: (a) a detailed statement of such

Settlement Class Member’s specific objections to any matters before the Court; (b) the grounds for

such objections and the reason such Settlement Class Member desires to appear and to be heard; and

Member wants the Court to consider.

6.7 Review of Claims Submitted. The Settlement Administrator shall determine whether

a submitted Claim Form meets the requirements set forth in this Settlement Agreement. Each Claim

Form shall be submitted to and reviewed by the Settlement Administrator, who shall determine whether

each Claim shall be allowed. The Settlement Administrator shall use best practices and all reasonable

efforts and means to identify and reject duplicate and/or fraudulent claims, including, without

limitation, indexing all payments provided to the Settlement Class Members.

6.8 Rejection of Claims Forms. Claim Forms that do not meet the requirements set forth

in this Settlement and/or in the Claim Form instructions shall be rejected. Where a good faith basis

exists, the Settlement Administrator may reject a Claim Form for, among other reasons, the following:

(a) the Claim Form identifies a product that is not covered by the terms of this Settlement; (b) failure

to fully complete and/or sign the Claim Form; (c) illegible Claim Form; (d) the Claim Form is

fraudulent; (e) the Claim Form is duplicative of another Claim Form; (f) the person submitting the

Claim Form is not a Settlement Class Member; (g) the person submitting the Claim Form requests that

payment be made to a person or entity other than the Settlement Class Member for whom the Claim

Form is submitted; (h) failure to timely submit a Claim Form; or (i) the Claim Form otherwise does not

meet the requirements of this Settlement Agreement. Claim Forms that do not meet the terms and

conditions of this Settlement shall be promptly rejected by the Settlement Administrator. The

Settlement Administrator shall have thirty (30) days from the end of the Claims Period to exercise the

right of rejection. The Settlement Administrator shall notify the claimant using the contact information

provided in the Claim Form of the rejection. Class Counsel and Defense Counsel shall be provided

with copies of all such notifications of rejection, provided that the copies do not contain the name,

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 15 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

email address, mailing address, or other personal identifying information of the claimant. If any

claimant whose Claim Form has been rejected, in whole or in part, desires to contest such rejection,

the claimant must, within ten (10) days from receipt of the rejection, transmit to the Settlement

Administrator by email or U.S. mail a notice and statement of reasons indicating the claimant’s grounds

for contesting the rejection, along with any supporting documentation, and requesting further review

by the Settlement Administrator, in consultation with Class Counsel and Defense Counsel, of the denial

of the Claim. If Class Counsel and Defense Counsel cannot agree on a resolution of the claimant’s

notice contesting the rejection, the disputed Claim shall be presented to the Court or a referee appointed

by the Court for summary and non-appealable resolution. No person shall have any claim against

Apple, Defense Counsel, the Named Plaintiffs, Class Counsel, and/or the Settlement Administrator

based on any eligibility determinations, distributions, or awards made in accordance with this

Settlement. This provision does not affect or limit in any way the right of review by the Court or

referee of any disputed Claim Forms as provided in this Settlement.

6.9 Information Regarding Claims Submitted, Approved, and Rejected. Within forty-

five (45) days from the end of the Claims Period, the Settlement Administrator shall provide a

spreadsheet to Class Counsel and Defense Counsel that contains information sufficient to determine:

(a) the number of Settlement Class Members that submitted a claim; (b) the number of submitted Claim

Forms that are valid and timely, and which are not; (c) the number of submitted Claim Forms the

Settlement Administrator intends to treat as Approved Claims; and (d) the number of submitted Claim

Forms the Settlement Administrator has denied and the reason(s) for the denials. The Settlement

Administrator shall provide supplemental spreadsheets with respect to any Claim Forms submitted

after the expiration of the deadline, within a reasonable time after receiving such Claim Forms. The

materials that the Settlement Administrator provides to Class Counsel pursuant to this paragraph shall

not contain the names, email addresses, mailing addresses, or other personal identifying information of

the Settlement Class Members. The Settlement Administrator shall retain the originals of all Claim

Forms (including envelopes with postmarks, as applicable), and shall make copies available to Class

Counsel or Defense Counsel (with redactions to remove the names, email addresses, mailing addresses,

or other personal identifying information of the Settlement Class Members) upon request. All such

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 16 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

spreadsheets and related materials (including Claim Forms) shall be designated as “Highly Confidential

– Attorneys’ Eyes Only” as provided in paragraph 6.2.3. Should Class Counsel believe they require

the name, email address, mailing address, or other personal identifying information of any particular

Settlement Class Member, the Parties shall meet-and-confer, on a case-by-case basis, to determine

whether the release of such personal identifying information is necessary. Any disputes regarding

whether such information may be released to Class Counsel shall be presented to the Court or a referee

appointed by the Court for summary and non-appealable resolution. The Settlement Administrator

shall only release personal identifying information upon authorization of Apple and/or the authorization

of the Court or referee.

6.10 Calculation of Cash Payments. In addition to the spreadsheet(s) specified in

paragraph 6.9, within twenty (20) days from the Effective Date, the Settlement Administrator shall

provide to Defense Counsel and Class Counsel information sufficient to calculate the per-device and

aggregate cash payment for the Approved Claims, calculated in accordance with paragraphs 5.1, 5.2,

and 5.3. If multiple Settlement Class Members submit Claims pertaining to the same eligible device,

the payment amount for that device shall be divided equally among those Settlement Class Members

submitting Approved Claims regarding that particular device.

6.11 Opportunity for Review. Defense Counsel and Class Counsel shall have fourteen (14)

days after receiving the spreadsheet(s) and information specified in paragraph 6.9 to contest the

Settlement Administrator’s determination with respect to any of the submitted Claims. Defense

Counsel and Class Counsel shall meet and confer in good faith within ten (10) days to reach resolution

of any such disputed Claim(s). If Class Counsel and Defense Counsel cannot agree on a resolution of

any such disputed Claim(s), the disputed Claim(s) shall be presented to the Court or a referee appointed

by the Court for summary and non-appealable resolution.

6.12 Timing of Payment to Settlement Administrator. Within fifty (50) days after the

Effective Date, Apple shall deliver the Settlement Funds to the Settlement Administrator. The

Settlement Administrator shall agree to hold the Settlement Funds in a non-interest-bearing account,

and administer the Settlement Funds, subject to the continuing jurisdiction of the Court and from the

earliest possible date, as a qualified settlement fund as defined in Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1, et

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 17 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

seq. Any taxes owed by the Settlement Funds shall be paid by the Settlement Administrator out of the

Settlement Funds.

6.13 Procedures for Distribution of Cash Payments. Within thirty (30) days after

receiving the Settlement Funds pursuant to paragraph 6.12, the Settlement Administrator shall have

substantially completed issuance of the payments to the Settlement Class Members for the Approved

Claims (and in the case of Named Plaintiffs, the additional Named Plaintiff Service Awards), which

shall be sent to Settlement Class Members through electronic distribution, or in the form of checks that

are mailed to the addresses provided on the submitted Claim Forms to those Settlement Class Members

for whom electronic distribution is not available.

7. COURT APPROVAL

7.1 The Parties agree to recommend approval of the Settlement to the Court as fair and

reasonable and to undertake their best efforts to obtain such approval. “Best efforts” includes that the

Parties may not oppose any application for appellate review by one of the Parties in the event the Court

denies preliminary or final approval. The Parties therefore agree that, by no later than February 28,

2020, the Named Plaintiffs shall submit this Settlement Agreement, together with its exhibits, to the

Court and shall apply for entry of the Preliminary Approval Order.

7.2 Class Counsel shall draft the Motion for Preliminary Approval requesting issuance of

the Preliminary Approval Order as soon as practicable after execution of this Settlement Agreement,

and provide that draft to Defense Counsel at least fourteen (14) days before filing the Motion with the

Court. The Motion for Preliminary Approval shall be written in a neutral manner that does not contain

inflammatory language about the Parties or their perceived conduct in the Actions.

7.3 Upon filing of the Motion for Preliminary Approval, Apple shall provide timely notice

of the Settlement as required by the Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1711, et seq.

7.4 In accordance with the schedule set in the Preliminary Approval Order, Class Counsel

shall draft the motion for Final Approval Order and Final Judgment and provide that draft to Defense

Counsel at least ten (10) days before filing such motion with the Court.

7.5 In the event that the Settlement is not approved (following the exhaustion of any

appellate review), then (a) this Settlement Agreement shall be null and void and of no force or effect,

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 18 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

(b) any payments made to the Settlement Administrator, including any and all interest earned thereon

less monies expended toward settlement administration and/or Settlement Funds, shall be returned to

Apple within ten (10) days from the date the Settlement Agreement becomes null and void, (c) any

release shall be of no force or effect, and (d) the Settlement may not be referred to or used as evidence

or for any other purpose whatsoever in the Actions or in any other action or proceeding. In such event,

each Action will proceed as if no settlement has been attempted, and the Parties shall be returned to

their respective procedural postures existing on the date the Settlement is executed, so that the Parties

may take such litigation steps that they otherwise would have been able to take absent the pendency of

this Settlement. However, any reversal, vacatur, or modification on appeal of (a) any amount of the

Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses awarded by the Court to Class Counsel, or (b) any determination by the

Court to award less than the amounts requested in Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses or Named Plaintiff

Service Awards shall not give rise to any right of termination or otherwise serve as a basis for

termination of this Settlement.

8. ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES AND NAMED PLAINTIFF SERVICE

AWARDS

8.1 Any award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses shall be decided by the Court and payable

from the Minimum Class Settlement Amount. At least fourteen (14) days before filing a motion

seeking any award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses, Class Counsel will disclose to Apple their lodestar

and the amount of fees they intend to seek. If the Parties do not agree on the amount of Attorneys’

Fees and Expenses that Class Counsel will seek, Class Counsel will seek, on behalf of all Plaintiffs’

Counsel, Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses for the benefit of all Named Plaintiffs and all other Settlement

Class Members. It is the Parties’ understanding that no other counsel will be entitled to an independent

award of attorneys’ fees or expenses.

8.2 The Parties have not yet agreed upon the amount of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses that

Class Counsel will seek, and Apple, while recognizing that the Settlement entitles Class Counsel to

seek reasonable fees and expenses, reserves the right, if any, to object to and oppose Class Counsel’s

requests for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses. Settlement Class Members shall also have at least thirty-

five (35) days to object to and oppose Class Counsel’s request for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses by

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 19 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

filing with the Court and serving on Class Counsel and Defense Counsel any objections relating to

Class Counsel’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses.

8.3 Within fourteen (14) business days of the Court’s Final Approval Order and Final

Judgment, Apple shall pay to Class Counsel, either through the Settlement Administrator or directly to

Class Counsel, fifty percent (50%) of any Court-approved Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses, subject to

Class Counsel executing the Undertaking Regarding Attorneys’ Fees and Costs attached as Exhibit H,

and providing all information necessary to effectuate such transmission, including adequate payment

instructions consisting of wire transfer instructions, instructions for payment by check, and completed

IRS Forms W-9 (including addresses and tax identification numbers). Pursuant to the Undertaking

Regarding Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, Class Counsel hereby jointly and severally submit themselves

and their law firms (including all shareholders, members, and/or partners of their law firms) to the

obligation to repay to Apple the Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses that have been paid if the Court’s Final

Approval Order and Final Judgment and/or order regarding Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses is vacated,

overturned, reversed, or rendered void. Furthermore, the Undertaking Regarding Attorneys’ Fees and

Costs authorizes the Court to summarily issue orders (including but not limited to judgments and

attachment orders) against each of Class Counsel for up to the full amount of Attorneys’ Fees and

Expenses (plus any additional attorneys’ fees or expenses incurred by Apple in connection with the

litigation or enforcement of the Undertaking), and to make findings for sanctions for contempt of court

and all other appropriate relief. Class Counsel submits to the jurisdiction of the Court to issue such

orders. Within seventy-five (75) days after the Effective Date, Apple shall pay to Class Counsel, either

through the Settlement Administrator or directly to Class Counsel, the remainder of the Court-approved

Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses, net of any modifications or reversals on appeal or otherwise. Class

Counsel has the authority and responsibility to allocate and distribute the awarded funds to other

counsel based, in its sole discretion, on counsel’s efforts and contributions in the Actions, provided that

the allocation and distribution is consistent with the Court’s order(s) regarding Attorneys’ Fees and

Expenses. Apple and Defense Counsel shall have no liability or other responsibility for allocation of

any such awarded funds, and, in the event that any dispute arises relating to the allocation of fees or

costs, Class Counsel and the Settlement Administrator agree to hold Apple and Defense Counsel

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 20 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

harmless from any and all such liabilities, costs, and expenses of such dispute.

8.4 Class Counsel will apply to the Court for the payment of a service award for the Named

Plaintiffs, not to exceed One Thousand Five-Hundred U.S. Dollars ($1,500.00) for each Named

Plaintiff who was not deposed in the Actions, and not to exceed Three Thousand Five-Hundred U.S.

Dollars ($3,500.00) for each Named Plaintiff who was deposed in the Actions (i.e., Romeo Alba,

Denise Bakke, Alisha Boykin, Steven Connolly, Alvin Davis, Loren Haller, Charlene Lowery, Cynthia

Stacy, and Trent Young). The Named Plaintiffs who are Settlement Class Members also shall be

required to submit Claim Forms as specified in paragraph 6.3.

8.5 The Settlement Administrator shall dispense the Named Plaintiff Service Awards from

the Settlement Funds (as defined in paragraph 1.33), and in the manner and timing set forth in paragraph

6.13.

8.6 The Court’s award(s) of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses and/or Named Plaintiff Service

Awards, if any, shall be separate from its determination of whether to approve the Settlement. In the

event the Court approves the Settlement, but declines to award Class Counsel’s Attorneys’ Fees and

Expenses and/or Named Plaintiff Service Awards in the amounts requested by Class Counsel, the

Settlement will nevertheless be binding on the Parties.

9. CALIFORNIA STATE ACTIONS AND JCCP ACTION

9.1 JCCP Counsel have agreed to the terms and conditions of this Settlement. Within ten

(10) days after entry of the Final Approval Order and Final Judgment in the MDL Action, JCCP

Counsel shall request dismissal of the JCCP Action with prejudice. Class Counsel shall allocate from

the Court’s award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses, if any, to JCCP Counsel an appropriate amount of

attorneys’ fees and expenses that, in Class Counsel’s discretion, is fair and equitable. Neither JCCP

Counsel nor any other plaintiffs’ counsel in any of the California state actions that constitute the JCCP

Action shall make an independent claim for attorneys’ fees or expenses in any federal or state court.

10. RELEASES AND DISMISSAL OF ACTIONS

10.1 As of the Effective Date, the Settlement Class Members and their respective heirs,

executors, administrators, representatives, agents, partners, successors, and assigns shall have fully,

finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged any and all past, present, and future claims,

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 21 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

actions, demands, causes of action, suits, debts, obligations, damages, rights and liabilities, that were

brought, could have been brought, or are related to the same facts underlying the claims asserted in the

Actions regarding the iPhone devices at issue, known or unknown, recognized now or hereafter,

existing or preexisting, expected or unexpected, pursuant to any theory of recovery (including, but not

limited to, those based in contract or tort, common law or equity, federal, state, territorial, or local law,

statute, ordinance, or regulation), against the Released Parties, for any type of relief that can be released

as a matter of law, including, without limitation, claims for monetary relief, damages (whether

compensatory, consequential, punitive, exemplary, liquidated, and/or statutory), costs, penalties,

interest, attorneys’ fees, litigation costs, restitution, or equitable relief. Accordingly, the Settlement

shall terminate the MDL Action. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the release shall not include any

claims relating to the continued enforcement of the Settlement or the Protective Orders.

10.2 As of the Effective Date, the Named Plaintiffs (including the non-U.S. Named

Plaintiffs) and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, representatives, agents, partners,

successors, and assigns shall have fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged any

and all past, present, and future claims, actions, demands, causes of action, suits, debts, obligations,

damages, rights and liabilities, that were brought, could have been brought, or are related to the same

facts underlying the claims asserted in the Actions regarding the iPhone devices at issue, known or

unknown, recognized now or hereafter, existing or preexisting, expected or unexpected, pursuant to

any theory of recovery (including, but not limited to, those based in contract or tort, common law or

equity, federal, state, territorial, or local law, statute, ordinance, or regulation), against the Released

Parties, for any type of relief that can be released as a matter of law, including, without limitation,

claims for monetary relief, damages (whether compensatory, consequential, punitive, exemplary,

liquidated, and/or statutory), costs, penalties, interest, attorneys’ fees, litigation costs, restitution, or

equitable relief. Class Counsel and non-U.S. Named Plaintiffs hereby represent and warrant that the

non-U.S. Named Plaintiffs have the capacity to execute such a release under the applicable laws of

their respective jurisdictions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the release shall not include any claims

relating to the continued enforcement of the Settlement or the Protective Orders.

10.3 As of the Effective Date, Apple shall have fully, finally, and forever released,

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 22 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

relinquished, and discharged all claims of abuse of process, malicious prosecution, violations of Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 11, and any other claims arising out of the initiation or prosecution of the MDL

Action that are known to Apple as of the Effective Date, against the Named Plaintiffs, Class Counsel,

and Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee and Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee pursuant to the Order

Consolidating Related Actions and Appointing Interim Co-Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel and Executive and

Steering Committees (Dkt. 100). Notwithstanding the foregoing, this release shall not include any

future claims relating to the continued enforcement of the Settlement, the Protective Orders, and all

orders construing the Stipulated Protective Order, including but not limited to Dkt. 350. This release

does not constitute a general release.

10.4 As of the Effective Date, the Settlement Class Members and the Named Plaintiffs shall

have fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged all claims of abuse of process,

malicious prosecution, violations of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, and any other claims arising

out of the defense of the MDL Action that are known to the Settlement Class Members and/or the

Named Plaintiffs as of the Effective Date, against Apple’s attorneys, legal representatives, and

advisors, including Defense Counsel. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this release shall not include any

future claims relating to the continued enforcement of the Settlement, the Protective Orders, and all

orders construing the Stipulated Protective Order, including but not limited to Dkt. 350. This release

does not constitute a general release.

10.5 After entering into this Settlement, the Settlement Class Members and/or Named

Plaintiffs may discover facts other than, different from, or in addition to, those that they know or believe

to be true with respect to the claims released by this Settlement, but they intend to release fully, finally

and forever any and all such claims. The Settlement Class Members and Named Plaintiffs expressly

agree that, upon the Effective Date, they waive and forever release any and all provisions, rights, and

benefits conferred by:

a) Section 1542 of the California Civil Code, which reads:

A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS

THAT THE CREDITOR OR RELEASING PARTY DOES

NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER

FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE

AND THAT, IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER, WOULD HAVE

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 23 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT

WITH THE DEBTOR OR RELEASED PARTY.

and

b) any law of any state, territory, or possession of the United States (or for the non-

U.S. Named Plaintiffs, their respective country, province, or state), or principle

of common law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to Section 1542 of

the California Civil Code.

10.6 Upon the Effective Date, the Actions shall be dismissed with prejudice. Class Counsel

shall have the responsibility for ensuring that the MDL Action (including the actions identified in

Appendix “A”) and the JCCP Action are dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the terms of this

Settlement.

10.7 The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this Action to enforce the terms of this

Settlement. In the event that any applications for relief are made, such applications shall be made to

the Court. To avoid doubt, the Final Judgment applies to and is binding upon the Parties, the Settlement

Class Members, and their respective heirs, successors, and assigns.

11. DEFENDANT’S DENIAL OF LIABILITY; AGREEMENT AS DEFENSE IN FUTURE

PROCEEDINGS

11.1 Apple has indicated its intent to vigorously contest each and every claim in the Actions,

and denies all of the material allegations in the Actions. Apple enters into this Settlement Agreement

without in any way acknowledging any fault, liability, or wrongdoing of any kind. Apple nonetheless

has concluded that it is in its best interests that the Actions be settled on the terms and conditions set

forth herein in light of the expense that would be necessary to defend the Actions, the benefits of

disposing of protracted and complex litigation, and the desire of Apple to conduct its business

unhampered by the distractions of continued litigation.

11.2 Neither this Settlement Agreement, nor any of its terms or provisions, nor any of the

negotiation or proceedings connected with it, shall be construed as an admission or concession by

Apple of the truth of any of the allegations in the Actions, or of any liability, fault, or wrongdoing of

any kind.

11.3 To the extent permitted by law, neither this Settlement Agreement, nor any of its terms,

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 24 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

nor any of the negotiations or proceedings connected with it, shall be offered as evidence or received

in evidence in any pending or future civil, criminal, administrative, or other action or proceeding to

establish any liability or admission by Apple.

11.4 To the extent permitted by law, this Settlement Agreement may be pleaded as a full and

complete defense to, and may be used as the basis for an injunction against, any action, suit, or other

proceeding which may be instituted, prosecuted, or attempted for claims covered by the releases in this

Settlement Agreement.

12. MODIFICATION OR TERMINATION OF THE SETTLEMENT

12.1 Apple may, at its sole discretion, terminate this Settlement Agreement if the number of

devices associated with the individuals who seek exclusion from the Settlement Class exceeds a

specified number of devices attached as Exhibit I and submitted to the Court for in camera review.

12.2 The terms and provisions of this Settlement Agreement may be amended, modified, or

expanded by written agreement of the Parties and approval of the Court; provided, however, that after

entry of the Final Approval Order and Final Judgment, the Parties may by written agreement effect

such amendments, modifications, or expansions of this Settlement Agreement and its implementing

documents (including all exhibits) without further notice to the Settlement Class or approval by the

Court if such changes are consistent with the Court’s Final Approval Order and Final Judgment and do

not materially alter, reduce, or limit the rights of Settlement Class Members.

12.3 In the event the terms or conditions of this Settlement Agreement, other than terms

pertaining to the Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses and/or Named Plaintiff Service Awards, are materially

modified by any court, Apple may, in its sole discretion and within thirty (30) days of such material

modification, declare this Settlement null and void as provided in paragraph 7.5. For purposes of this

paragraph, material modifications include any modifications to the definitions of the Settlement Class,

Settlement Class Members, Released Parties, or the scope of the releases (as provided in paragraphs

10.1 and 10.2), any modifications to the terms of the Settlement consideration (as provided in

paragraphs 5.1 to 5.3.3), and any changes to the notice provisions. In the event of any modification by

any court, and in the event Apple does not exercise its unilateral option to withdraw from this

Settlement, the Parties shall meet and confer within fourteen (14) days of such modification to attempt

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 25 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

to reach an agreement as to how best to effectuate the court-ordered modification.

12.4 If the Effective Date is not reached, this Settlement Agreement is without prejudice to

the rights of any party hereto, and all terms, negotiations, and proceedings connected therewith shall

not be deemed or construed to be an admission by any Party or evidence of any kind in these Actions

or any other action or proceeding.

13. NOTICES

13.1 All notices to Named Plaintiffs shall be delivered to:

Joseph W. Cotchett, Esq.

Mark C. Molumphy, Esq.

Anya Thepot, Esq.

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP

840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200

Burlingame, CA 94010

jcotchett@cpmlegal.com

[email protected]

Laurence D. King, Esq.

Frederic S. Fox, Esq

Donald R. Hall, Esq.

David A. Straite, Esq

Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP

1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1560

Oakland, CA 94612

[email protected]

13.2 All notices to Apple shall be delivered to:

Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Esq.

Richard J. Doren, Esq.

Christopher Chorba, Esq.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

333 South Grand Avenue

Los Angeles, CA 90071

[email protected]

13.3 The notice recipients and addresses designated in paragraphs 13.1 and 13.2 may be

changed upon written notice provided to all individuals identified in those paragraphs.

14. MISCELLANEOUS

14.1 The exhibits and appendices attached to this Settlement Agreement are integral parts

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 26 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

thereof and together with this Settlement Agreement, contain the entire, complete and integrated

statement of each and every term and provision of the Settlement. This Settlement Agreement may not

be modified in any respect except upon the written consent of the Parties.

14.2 The undersigned each represent and warrant that each has authority to enter into this

Settlement Agreement on behalf of the Party indicated below his or her name.

14.3 If, prior to the Effective Date, Class Counsel knows, or has reason to know, of any

Named Plaintiff who intends to exclude himself or herself from the Settlement or who intends to submit

an objection to the Settlement, Class Counsel shall promptly notify Defense Counsel within three (3)

days. The Parties shall thereafter meet and confer within seven (7) days of such notification to

determine whether any modifications to the Settlement, or any other actions or filings, are required.

14.4 Class Counsel and the Named Plaintiffs represent and warrant that they have not

assigned or transferred, or purported to assign or transfer, to any person or entity, any claim or any

portion thereof or interest therein, including, but not limited to, any interest in the Actions or any related

action, and they further represent and warrant that they know of no such assignments or transfers on

the part of any member of the Settlement Class.

14.5 The Parties, together with Class Counsel and Defense Counsel, have jointly participated

in the drafting of this Settlement Agreement. No Party hereto shall be considered the drafter of this

Settlement Agreement or any provision hereof for the purpose of any statute, case law or rule of

interpretation or construction that would or might cause any provision to be construed against the

drafter hereof.

14.6 As used in this Settlement Agreement, the masculine, feminine, or neutral gender, and

the singular or plural wording, shall each be deemed to include the others whenever the context so

indicates.

14.7 Unless otherwise noted, all references to “days” in this Settlement Agreement shall be

to calendar days. In the event any date or deadline set forth in this Settlement Agreement falls on a

weekend or federal legal holiday, such date or deadline shall be on the first business day thereafter.

14.8 Any and all disputes arising from or related to this Settlement Agreement must be

brought by the Parties, Class Counsel, Defense Counsel, and/or members of the Settlement Class

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 27 of 161

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

exclusively to the Court. The Parties, Class Counsel, Defense Counsel and members of the Settlement

Class irrevocably submit to the exclusive and continuing jurisdiction of the Court for any suit, action,

proceeding, or dispute arising out of or relating to this Settlement Agreement. All terms of this

Settlement Agreement and any suit, action, proceeding, or dispute arising out of or relating to this

Settlement Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted according to the substantive laws of the

State of California without regard to choice of law or conflicts of laws principles; however, nothing in

this Settlement Agreement shall operate as a waiver of any Party’s position regarding the applicable

law governing the underlying claims at issue in the Actions.

14.9 Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the Parties may jointly agree to reasonable

extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of this Settlement Agreement.

14.10 All motions, discovery, and other proceedings in the Actions shall be stayed until the

Court enters the Final Approval Order and Final Judgment, or this Settlement Agreement is otherwise

terminated.

14.11 Nothing in this Settlement Agreement shall alter or abrogate any prior Court orders

entered in the MDL Action.

14.12 This Settlement Agreement may be executed in counterparts. Facsimile or PDF

signatures shall be considered valid as of the date they bear.

14.13 The Parties, together with Class Counsel and Defense Counsel, agree to prepare and

execute all documents, to seek Court approvals, to defend Court approvals, and to do all things

reasonably necessary to complete the Settlement.

14.14 This Settlement Agreement is executed voluntarily by each of the Parties without any

duress or undue influence on the part, or on behalf, of any of them. The Parties represent and warrant

to each other that they have read and fully understand the provisions of this Settlement Agreement and

have relied on the advice and representation of legal counsel of their own choosing.

14.15 This Settlement Agreement may be amended or modified only by a written instrument

signed by Defense Counsel and Class Counsel and approved by the Court.

[Signatures on following page]

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 28 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 29 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 30 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 31 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 32 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 33 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 34 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 35 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 36 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 37 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 38 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 39 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 40 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 41 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 42 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 43 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 44 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 45 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 46 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 47 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 48 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 49 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 50 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 51 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 52 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 53 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 54 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 55 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 56 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 57 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 58 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 59 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 60 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 61 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 62 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 63 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 64 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 65 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 66 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 67 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 68 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 69 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 70 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 71 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 72 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 73 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 74 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 75 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 76 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 77 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 78 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 79 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 80 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 81 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 82 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 83 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 84 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 85 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 86 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 87 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 88 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 89 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 90 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 91 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 92 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 93 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 94 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 95 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 96 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 97 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 98 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 99 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 100 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 101 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 102 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 103 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 104 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 105 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 106 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 107 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 108 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 109 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 110 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 111 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 112 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 113 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 114 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 115 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 116 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 117 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 118 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 119 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 120 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 121 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 122 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 123 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 124 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 125 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 126 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 127 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 128 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 129 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 130 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 131 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 132 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 133 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 134 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 135 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 136 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 137 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 138 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 139 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 140 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 141 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 142 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 143 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 144 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 145 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 146 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 147 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 148 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 149 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 150 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 151 of 161





























































67,38/$7,212)6(77/(0(17

&$6(120'(-'

'$7(')HEUXDU\BBB

7+(%5$1',/$:),50



 7KRPDV-%UDQGL

7HUHQFH'(GZDUGV

7+(%5$1',/$:),50

3LQH6WUHHW7KLUG)ORRU

6DQ)UDQFLVFR&$



 JCCP Counse



'$7(')HEUXDU



BBB

 $33/(,1&





1RUHHQ.UDOO

9LFH3UHVLGHQW&KLHI/LWLJDWLRQ&RXQVHO



le Inc.



'$7(')HEUXDU



BBB

 *,%621'811&587&+(5//3



 7KHRGRUH-%RXWURXV-U

5LFKDUG-'RUHQ

&KULVWRSKHU&KRUED

'LDQD0)HLQVWHLQ

*,%621'811&587&+(5//3

6RXWK*UDQG$YHQXH

/RV$QJHOHV&$

WERXWURXV#JLEVRQGXQQFRP

UGRUHQ#JLEVRQGXQQFRP

FFKRUED#JLEVRQGXQQFRP

GIHLQVWHLQ#JLEVRQGXQQFRP

 Counsel

or A

le Inc.



Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 152 of 161

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 153 of 161

163

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

APPENDIX A

Actions in the MDL Action

Case District Case No.

Abdulla v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Ill. 1:17-cv-09178

Aburos v. Apple Inc.

S.D. Fla. 1:17-cv-24712

Banks v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00241

Batista v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:17-cv-07355

Bilic v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00449

Block v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00481

Bogdanovich v. Apple Inc.

C.D. Cal. 2:17-cv-09138

Bond v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00833

Borstelmann v. Apple Inc.

E.D. Mo. 4:18-cv-00289

Brand v. Apple Inc.

D.S.C. 2:17-cv-03453

Brodsky v. Apple Inc.

E.D.N.Y. 2:18-cv-01998

Brody v. Apple Inc.

E.D.N.Y. 1:18-cv-00080

Burton v. Apple Inc.

W.D. Mo. 2:17-cv-04257

Canoa de Oliveira v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00735

Chapel v. Apple Inc.

W.D. Mo. 2:18-cv-04007

Cook v. Apple Inc.

S.D. Cal. 3:17-cv-02579

Corporacion Nacional de Consumidores y

Usuarios de Chile v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 3:18-cv-02527

Cunningham v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00338

Diner v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00179

Donahoe v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Ohio 1:18-cv-00763

Drantivy v. Apple Inc.

E.D.N.Y. 1:17-cv-07480

Fahey v. Apple Inc.

D.D.C. 1:18-cv-00937

Ferguson v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00206

Ford v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00760

Fung v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-01585

Gallmann v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:17-cv-07285

Gilson v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00216

Gonzalez v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:19-cv-06646

Grillo v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00148

Hakimi v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:17-cv-07292

Harvey v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:17-cv-07274

Hawes v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-01339

Hogue v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00910

Holman v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00125

Honigman v. Apple Inc.

E.D.N.Y. 2:18-cv-00046

Johnson v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00385

Jones v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00406

LaNasa v. Apple Inc.

E.D. La. 2:17-cv-17878

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 154 of 161

164

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

Case District Case No.

Lankford v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Ala. 5:18-cv-00257

Lazarus v. Apple Inc.

E.D.N.Y. 1:17-cv-07485

Liebermann v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00110

Littlefied v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00182

Mailyan v. Apple Inc.

C.D. Cal. 2:17-cv-09192

Mallh v. Apple Inc.

E.D.N.Y. 1:18-cv-00051

McDonald v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Ill. 1:18-cv-00226

McInnis v. Apple Inc.

S.D. Miss. 1:17-cv-00358

Merenstein v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00771

Miller v. Apple Inc.

E.D. Tex. 4:17-cv-00889

Mills v. Apple Inc.

D.N.J. 3:18-cv-00780

Munro v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00128

Naylor v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:19-cv-04421

Neilan v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Ill. 1:17-cv-09296

Neumann v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00324

Rabinovits v. Apple Inc.

S.D.N.Y. 1:17-cv-10032

Rodriguez v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-03989

Schroeder v. Apple Inc.

S.D. Ind. 1:17-cv-04750

Sens v. Apple Inc.

S.D. Fla. 0:18-cv-60128

Simon v. Apple Inc.

S.D. Fla. 1:18-cv-20151

Solak v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00123

Stefanou v Apple Inc.

S.D. Ohio 1:18-cv-00007

Taylor v. Apple Inc.

N.D Ala. 7:18-cv-00168

Webb v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 3:18-cv-02167

Werner v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00283

Wetherald v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00371

White v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-00305

Williams v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 3:18-cv-00440

Yun v. Apple Inc.

N.D. Cal. 5:18-cv-01632

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 155 of 161

165

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

APPENDIX B

Named Plaintiffs

Akrawy, Lilav (Netherlands)†

Alba, Romeo*

Albertson, Kayla

Alexander, Rifah

Antonucci, Ashley Ann

Bakke, Denise*

Baldwin, Timothy

Batista, Aniledis

Becker, Henry

Bilic, Kristin

Boyd, Aisha

Boykin, Alisha*

Boykin, Angela

Brodsky, Sandra

Brown, Amy

Brown, Kimberly

Browne, Kevin

Bryant, Natasha

Burriss, Patti

Caceres, Juliana (Colombia)†

Canoa de Oliveira, Guilherme (Brazil)†

Carlo, Laura

Chandra, Nakul (India)†

Chen, Hanpeng (Canada)†

Christensen, Fredrick

Ciccone, Laura

Ciccone, Thomas Anthony

Connolly, Steven*

Cook, Thomas

D’Alesandro, Georgiana

Daci, Burim (Norway)†

Daily, Charlie Bell

Darack, Irwin

David, Jonathan

Davis, Alvin*

DeFillippo, Patrick

Diamond, Laura Gail

Diaz, Lillie Reap

Dillard, Erica

Diner, Samara

Ellis, William C.

Erwin, Beckie

Farris, John

Flores, Aurelia

Gaudio, Elisa (Canada)†

Gautreaux, Christopher

Gheewalla, Shemina

Gilson, Robert

Goldfeld, Hayley

Goodrich, Tanya

Gordon, Tamica

Greenfield, Tammy

Greenshner, Jessica

Haller, Loren*

Hansen, Kristin

Hawes, Sara

Hawkins, Ronald

Henry, Steven

Herman, Kyle

Holman, Amanda

Jackson, Mary

Jankowski, Kelly A.

Johnson, Dale

Kile, James

Kingston, Kristopher

Klingman, Jill

Krueger, Connie

Langlands, Lisa

Lazarus, Benjamin

Lipetz, Robyn

Long, Lauren

Lowery, Charlene*

Macinanti, Brian

Mangano, Samuel

Margolis, Stephen

Martino, Michelle

McGill, Brinley

Merenstein, Gary

Merola, Sandra

Meyers, Jonathan Jed

Milman, Judy

Moore, Craig Jonathan

Morgan, Tim

Moriello, Barbara

Murakami, Yuichi (Japan)†

Naylor, Zoe

Ni, Kaixuan (China)†

Norman, Amy

O’Neill, Jacquelyn

Pethick, Lawrence

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 156 of 161

166

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

Praszkier, Herman

Rabbanian, Aaron

Ratner, Jason

Ray, Jhonjulee

Rodriguez, Alex Eugene

Rodriguez, Daphne Bowles

Rosalia, Sheri

Rutan, Susan

Santino, Nikita

Saracina, Darlane

Schmidt, Caren

Shapiro, Adam

Shaske, Matthew

Smith, Kenyotta

Sonna, Linda (Mexico)†

Stacy, Cynthia*

Stone, Sarah

Stratton, Hannah

Tandel, Jessica

Tanovan, Eric

Taylor, Jeanette

Taylor, Joseph

Thompson, Judith

Thompson, Tonya Margarette

Tiano, Gerald

Torres, Shiriam

Toth, Thomas

Valle, Heidi

Vega, Patricia

Victory, Drew

Villegas, Ida

Vinacco, Annamarie

Wagner, Marianne (Belgium)†

Webb, John

Weintraub, Lauren

White, Brandi S.

Williams, Khendle Harvest

Woolsey, Kenneth

Yashchuk, Andrew

Yeganeh, Andrew

Yelton, Sherri

Young, Trent*

* Deposed

† Non-U.S. Named Plaintiff

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 157 of 161

167

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

APPENDIX C

Plaintiffs’ Counsel

AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC

Robert Ahdoot

Tina Wolfson

Theodore W. Maya

Bradley K. King

AUDET & PARTNERS, LLP

William M. Audet

S. Clinton Woods

Ling Y. Kuang

BARNES & ASSOCIATES

Jason Barnes

BARNOW AND ASSOCIATES, P.C.

Ben Barnow

Erich P. Schork

Jeffrey D. Blake

Anthony L. Parkhill

BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW, METHVIN,

PORTIS & MILES, P.C.

Archie I. Grubb, II

W. Daniel Miles

BERNSTEIN LIEBHARD LLP

Stanley D. Bernstein

U. Seth Ottensoser

Stephanie M. Beige

BIRKA-WHITE LAW OFFICES

David M. Birka-White

BLOOD HURST & O’REARDON, LLP

Timothy G. Blood

Thomas J. O’Reardon II

BOYLE BRASHER LLC

Richard I. Woolf

BRAGAR EAGEL & SQUIRE, P.C.

Jeffrey H. Squire

David J. Stone

Todd H. Henderson

BROWN LAW FIRM, LLC

Phyllis E. Brown

Adam S. Brown

BROWN NERI, SMITH & KHAN LLP

Nathan M. Smith

CAFFERTY CLOBES MERIWETHER &

SPRENGEL LLP

Bryan L. Clobes

Anthony F. Fata

Christopher P.T. Tourek

CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN,

BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C.

James E. Cecchi

Caroline F. Bartlett

Donald A. Ecklund

Michael A. Innes

CARLSON LYNCH SWEET KILPELA &

CARPENTER, LLP

Todd D. Carpenter

CASEY GERRY SCHENK FRANCAVILLA

BLATT & PENFIELD LLP

David S. Casey, Jr.

Gayle M. Blatt

Jeremy Robinson

Angela Jae Chun

Alyssa Williams

CHAVEZ & GERTLER LLP

Mark A. Chavez

COHEN & MALAD, LLP

Irwin B. Levin

Richard E. Shevitz

Vess A. Miller

Lynn A. Toops

COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL

PLLC

Andrew N. Friedman

Douglas J. McNamara

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 158 of 161

168

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP

Joseph W. Cotchett

Mark C. Molumphy

Brian Danitz

Elle D. Lewis

Tyson Redenbarger

Gina Stassi

Gwendolyn R. Giblin

Tamarah P. Prevost

DEREK G. HOWARD LAW FIRM

Derek Howard

DIAMOND McCARTHY LLP

Christopher D. Sullivan

DICELLO LEVITT & CASEY LLC

Amy E. Keller

DRANTIVY LAW FIRM, PLLC

Edwin Drantivy

BROWN NERI, SMITH & KHAN LLP

Nathan M. Smith

EDELMAN, COMBS, LATTURNER &

GOODWIN, LLC

Daniel A. Edelman

Cathleen M. Combs

James O. Latturner

Emiliya Gumin Farbstein

EGGNATZ | PASCUCCI

Joshua H. Eggnatz

Michael J. Pascucci

Steven Saul

FAZIO | MICHELETTI LLP

Jeffrey L. Fazio

Dina E. Micheletti

FINKELSTEIN, BLANKINSHIP FREI-

PEARSON & GARBER, LLP

Jeremiah Frei-Pearson

Chantal Khalil

Todd Garber

FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP

Gordon M. Fauth, Jr.

Rosanne L. Mah

Todd Garber

FLEENOR & GREEN LLP

Wilson F. Green

FOOTE MIELKE CHAVEZ O’NEIL, LLC

Robert M. Foote

GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP

Eric H. Gibbs

David Stein

Joshua Bloomfield

GIRARDI KEESE

Alexandra Steele

GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A.

Jay W. Eisenhofer

Olav A. Haazen

Kyle J. McGee

HADSELL STORMER RICHARDSON &

RENICK, LLP

Randall Robinson Renick

HAEGGQUIST & ECK, LLP

Alreen Haeggquist

Amber L. Eck

Kathleen Herkenhoff

Aaron M. Olsen

Robert D. Prine

Samantha A. Smith

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP

Shana E. Scarlett

Steve W. Berman

Robert F. Lopez

HERMINA LAW GROUP

John Hermina

HOBSON, BERNARDINO & DAVIS, LLP

Rafael Bernardino, Jr.

Jason A. Hobson

Andrew Kierstead

Peter Wasylyk

JAMES S. WERTHEIM LLC

James S. Wertheim

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 159 of 161

169

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

JENKINS MULLIGAN & GABRIEL LLP

Daniel J. Mulligan

Larry Wayne Gabriel

JOHNSON FISTEL, LLP

Frank J. Johnson

Phong L. Tran

JOHNSTON PRATT PLLC

Kenneth C. Johnston

Robert W. Gifford

KAASS LAW

Armen Kiramijyan

Hovsep Hovsepyan

KANTROWITZ, GOLDHAMER &

GRAIFMAN, P.C.

Gary S. Graifman

Jay I. Brody

KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP

Fred Fox

Laurence D. King

David Straite

Donald R. Hall

Matthew B. George

Mario M. Choi

Aaron Schwartz

KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P.

Eric Jason Fierro

Jeffrey Lewis

Mark A. Griffin

Karin B. Swope

KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK,

LLP

Eli R. Greenstein

Joseph H. Meltzer

Samantha Holbrook

THE LAW OFFICE OF ARON D.

ROBINSON

Aron D. Robinson

LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTINE RISTER

Christine M. Rister

LAW OFFICE OF GREGORY ALLEN

Gregory Allen

THE LAW OFFICES OF GREGG A. PINTO

Gregg A. Pinto

THE LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD B.

ROSENTHAL, P.A.

Richard B. Rosenthal

LEAR WERTS LLP

Bradford B. Lear

Todd C. Werts

LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP

Rosemary M. Rivas

Quentin A. Roberts

Andrea Clisura

LEVIN SEDRAN & BERMAN

Daniel C. Levin

Charles E. Schaffer

MASTANDO & ARTRIP, LLC

Eric J. Artrip

D. Anthony Mastando

MATTHEW EDWARD DONAHUE

MAYER LAW PRACTICE

Aaron Mayer

MILBERG TADLER PHILLIPS

GROSSMAN LLP

David Azar

Peggy Wedgworth

Andrei Rado

Jennifer Czeisler

Ariana Tadler

MINAMI TAMAKI LLP

Sean Tamura-Sato

Lisa P. Mak

NOAH BENJAMIN NOVOGRODSKY

PODHURST ORSECK, P.A.

Stephen F. Rosenthal

Matthew P. Weinshall

POMERANTZ LLP

Jennifer Pafiti

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 160 of 161

170

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

RED SAPPHIRE, P.C.

Ugonne Ndukwu Lord

ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD

LLP

Shawn A. Williams

Samuel H. Rudman

Mark S. Reich

Avital O. Malina

Paul J. Geller

Mark J. Dearman

Jason H. Aperstein

Ricardo Marenco

SAVERI & SAVERI, INC.

R. Alexander Saveri

Cadio Zirpoli

Sarah Van Culin

Geoffrey Rushing

SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC

Scott Edward Cole

Mark G. Griffin

Andrew Daniel Weaver

SEEGER WEISS LLP

Christopher A. Seeger

David R. Buchanan

Cristopher L. Ayers

SEIDMAN LEGAL

Joshua E. Seidman

SETAREH LAW GROUP

Shaun Setareh

Thomas Segal

SIMON LAW FIRM

Anthony G. Simon

STECKLER GRESHAM COCHRAN PLLC

Bruce W. Steckler

L. Kirstine Rogers

STRAUSS TROY CO., LPA

Richard S. Wayne

Joseph J. Braun

STULL, STULL & BRODY

Patrice L. Bishop

Melisa R. Emert

SULAIMAN LAW GROUP, LTD.

James Vlahakis

Omar Sulaiman

Mohammed Badwan

Ahmad Sulaiman

Nathan C. Volheim

THE WAGNER FIRM

Avraham Wagner

THOMAS C. WILCOX

WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

Bobby Saadian

Colin M. Jones

WITES LAW FIRM

Marc A. Wites

ZIMMERMAN REED LLP

Christopher P. Ridout

Caleb L.H. Marker

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416 Filed 02/28/20 Page 161 of 161

EXHIBIT A

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-1 Filed 02/28/20 Page 1 of 6

In re Apple Inc. Device Performance Litig.

Claim Form and Instructions (Online and Print Formats)

INSTRUCTIONS

Please read these instructions carefully then select either the Electronic Claim Form or Printed Claim

Form option at the bottom of the page. If you need assistance completing a Claim Form, you may send

an email to [e-mail address for Claims Administrator] or visit [link to FAQ page]. Refer back to [link to full

notice] for more information about the Settlement.

Deadline and Submission Method. Claim Forms must be either:

(1) submitted online by [date]; or

(2) printed and received by the Claims Administrator via U.S. mail by [date].

Eligibility. The Settlement will provide a cash payment if you are the owner of an eligible device and

experienced diminished performance when running a certain version of iOS prior to December 21, 2017.

See below for details.

Eligible devices and iOS versions:

- iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, or SE device running iOS 10.2.1 or later

- iPhone 7 and 7 Plus running iOS 11.2 or later

You are limited to one cash payment per device. If you are the owner of more than one eligible device,

you must fill out a separate Claim Form for each device.

Unless you request exclusion from the class as explained in the Class Notice, you will be bound by the

Settlement Agreement and Release and the Final Judgment even if you do not submit the Claim Form.

You must fill out and submit a complete and accurate Claim Form by any of the above submission

methods by [date]. If your Claim Form is incomplete, contains false information, or is not submitted by the

deadline, your claim will be rejected and you will waive all rights to receive a payment under this

Settlement. The Claims Administrator may contact you to request more information to verify your claim.

The information you provide will be treated as confidential and used for the purpose of this Settlement

only.

Please select one of the Claim Form methods below to begin the Claim Form process.

Continue to Electronic Claim Form

Continue to Printed Claim Form

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-1 Filed 02/28/20 Page 2 of 6

ELECTRONIC CLAIM FORM

In this electronic Claim Form, you must fill out and submit a complete and accurate Claim Form below by

[date]. If your Claim Form is incomplete, contains false information, or is not submitted by the deadline,

your claim will be rejected and you will waive all rights to receive a payment under this Settlement. The

information you provide will be treated as confidential and used for the purpose of this Settlement only.

Any payment provided in response to your claim will be issued to the email address you provide on this

Claim Form, unless you elect to have payment mailed to the mailing address on this Claim Form. If you

prefer to submit a Printed Claim Form, follow this [link].

Step 1—INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ALL CLAIMANTS

iPhone Serial Number:

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

[You can find your serial number on your iPhone in Settings > General > About. If you no longer have

your iPhone, you can check the barcode on your device’s original packaging or refer to the original receipt

or invoice.]

Please indicate your preferred method of payment. (Please select only one option from the drop-down

menu.)

- Digital Check. If I have submitted a valid claim, please send me a digital check at the email

address above. I understand that I will be contacted at this email address with instructions for

receiving the digital check, for which you will need to provide your routing and bank account

number.

- Mailed Check. If I have submitted a valid claim, please send me a check at my mailing

address above.

Step 2—DEVICE AND iOS VERSION (Please select only one option from the drop-down menu.)

- I am the owner of an iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, or SE device that ran iOS 10.2.1 or later

prior to December 21, 2017;

- I am the owner of an iPhone 7 or 7 Plus device that ran iOS 11.2 or later prior to December 21,

2017.

Step 3—DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, SIGNATURE, & DATE

☐ I experienced diminished performance on my iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, or SE device

when running iOS 10.2.1 or later before December 21, 2017 OR my iPhone 7 or 7 Plus

when running iOS 11.2 or later before December 21, 2017.

You must sign this Claim Form by checking the box below and entering today’s date.

First Name Last Name

Mailing Address 1 Mailing Address 2

City State Zip Code

Email Address

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-1 Filed 02/28/20 Page 3 of 6

☐ By checking this box, I declare under penalty of perjury that the information above is true

and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that my claim is subject

to audit, review, and validation using all available information.

To file your claim, be sure to click on the Submit Claim Form button below.

REMINDERS

Your Claim Form must be submitted by [date]. Late or incomplete Claim Forms will be denied.

All information provided on this Claim Form is subject to verification.

After you click Submit Claim Form, you will be able to print and save a copy of this Claim Form for your

records.

Submit Claim Form

Type Your Name Here to Sign Your Claim Form

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-1 Filed 02/28/20 Page 4 of 6

PRINTED CLAIM FORM

In this printed Claim Form, you must fill out and deliver via U.S. mail a complete and accurate Claim Form

below by [date]. If your Claim Form is incomplete, contains false information, or is not submitted by the

deadline, your claim will be rejected and you will waive all rights to receive a payment under this

Settlement. The information you provide will be treated as confidential and used for the purpose of this

Settlement only. Any payment provided in response to your claim will be issued to the email address you

provide on this Claim Form, unless you elect to have payment mailed to the mailing address on this Claim

Form. If you prefer to submit a Claim Form electronically, follow this [link].

Please type or print clearly in blue or black ink.

Step 1—INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ALL CLAIMANTS

Name (First and Last): ________________________________________________________

Address: ________________________________________________________

City: ________________________________________________________

State: ________________________________________________________

Zip Code: ________________________________________________________

Email Address: ________________________________________________________

iPhone Serial Number:

☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

[You can find your serial number on your iPhone in Settings > General > About. If you no longer have

your iPhone, you can check the barcode on your device’s original packaging or refer to the original receipt

or invoice.]

Please indicate your preferred method of payment. (Please check only one option.)

☐ Digital Check. If I have submitted a valid claim, please send me a digital check at the

email address above. I understand that I will be contacted at this email address with

instructions for receiving the digital check.

☐ Mailed Check. If I have submitted a valid claim, please send me a check at my mailing

address above.

Step 2—DEVICE AND iOS VERSION (Please check only one option.)

☐ I am the owner of an iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, or SE device that ran iOS 10.2.1 or

later prior to December 21, 2017.

☐ I am the owner of an iPhone 7 or 7 Plus device that ran iOS 11.2 or later prior to

December 21, 2017.

Step 3—DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, SIGNATURE, & DATE

☐ I experienced diminished performance on my iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, or SE device

when running iOS 10.2.1 or later before December 21, 2017 OR my iPhone 7 or 7 Plus

when running iOS 11.2 or later before December 21, 2017.

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-1 Filed 02/28/20 Page 5 of 6

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information above is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge and belief. I understand that my claim is subject to audit, review, and validation using all

available information.

____________________________________ ________________________

SIGNED DATED

Please retain a copy of this Claim Form for your records.

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-1 Filed 02/28/20 Page 6 of 6

EXHIBIT B

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-2 Filed 02/28/20 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

If you are or were a U.S. owner of an iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, and/or SE device that

ran iOS 10.2.1 or later before December 21, 2017, and/or a U.S. owner of an iPhone 7 or 7

Plus device that ran iOS 11.2 or later before December 21, 2017, you could be entitled to

benefits under a class action settlement.

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California authorized this notice.

This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

 Under the proposed settlement, Apple will make a minimum, non-reversionary payment of

$310,000,000 and a maximum payment of $500,000,000, depending on the number of claims

submitted.

 You may be entitled to settlement benefits if you are or were (1) a United States owner of an

iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, 7, 7 Plus, and/or SE device (2) that ran iOS 10.2.1 or later or, in

the case of iPhone 7 and 7 Plus devices, that ran iOS 11.2 or later before December 21, 2017,

and (3) you experienced diminished performance on your device(s). For more information,

you can visit the settlement website at www.SmartphonePerformanceSettlement.com.

 Your legal rights are affected whether you act or don’t act. Please read this notice carefully.

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

OPTION EXPLANATION DEADLINE

SUBMIT A CLAIM

FORM ONLINE OR

IN THE MAIL

The only way to get a payment under the

settlement.

[date]

EXCLUDE

YOURSELF

Get no payment under the settlement. This is

the only option that allows you to be a part of

any other lawsuit against Apple about the

claims and allegations in this case.

[date]

OBJECT TO THE

SETTLEMENT

Write to the Court about why you don’t like the

settlement.

[date]

OBJECT TO

ATTORNEYS’ FEES

AND/OR EXPENSES

Write to the Court about why you don’t like the

attorneys’ fees and/or expenses that Class

Counsel requests.

[date]

GO TO A HEARING Ask to speak in Court about the fairness of the

settlement.

[date]

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-2 Filed 02/28/20 Page 2 of 11

DO NOTHING Get no payment under the settlement and give

up your right to compensation for the claims

and allegations in this case.

N/A

 These rights and options—and the deadlines to exercise them—are explained in this notice.

 The Court in charge of this case still must decide whether to approve the settlement. Payments

will be made if the Court approves the settlement and after any appeals are resolved. Please

be patient.

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

BASIC INFORMATION ................................................................................................................ 4

1. Why did I get a notice? ................................................................................................... 4

2. What is this lawsuit about? ............................................................................................. 4

3. Why is this a class action? .............................................................................................. 4

4. Why is there a settlement? .............................................................................................. 4

WHO IS IN THE SETTLEMENT .................................................................................................. 5

5. What is an eligible device? ............................................................................................. 5

6. How do I know if I am part of the settlement? ............................................................... 5

7. Are there exceptions to being included? ......................................................................... 5

8. I’m still not sure if I am included. ................................................................................... 5

THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS—WHAT YOU GET ................................................................ 5

9. What does the settlement provide? ................................................................................. 5

10. What are the requirements to receive a settlement benefit? ............................................ 6

HOW YOU GET A SETTLEMENT BENEFIT—SUBMITTING A CLAIM FORM .................. 6

11. How can I get a settlement benefit? ................................................................................ 6

12. When would I get my settlement benefit? ...................................................................... 6

13. What am I giving up to get a settlement benefit? ........................................................... 7

EXCLUDING YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT ............................................................ 7

14. How do I get out of the settlement? ................................................................................ 7

15. If I don’t request exclusion, can I sue Apple for the same thing later? .......................... 7

16. If I request exclusion, can I get a settlement benefit? ..................................................... 7

THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU .................................................................................... 8

17. Do I have a lawyer in this case? ...................................................................................... 8

18. How will the lawyers be paid? ........................................................................................ 8

OBJECTING TO THE SETTLEMENT ......................................................................................... 8

19. How do I tell the Court that I don’t like the settlement? ................................................. 8

20. What’s the difference between objecting and requesting exclusion? ............................. 9

THE COURT’S FAIRNESS HEARING ........................................................................................ 9

21. When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the settlement? .................. 9

22. Do I need to come to the Final Hearing? ........................................................................ 9

23. May I speak at the Final Hearing? ................................................................................ 10

IF YOU DO NOTHING ............................................................................................................... 10

24. What happens if I do nothing at all? ............................................................................. 10

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-2 Filed 02/28/20 Page 3 of 11

GETTING MORE INFORMATION ............................................................................................ 10

25. Are there more details about the settlement? ................................................................ 10

26. How do I get more information? ................................................................................... 10

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-2 Filed 02/28/20 Page 4 of 11

BASIC INFORMATION

1. Why did I get a notice?

You may be a United States owner of an iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, 7, 7 Plus, and/or SE

device that ran iOS 10.2.1 or later (or, in the case of iPhone 7 and 7 Plus devices, that ran iOS

11.2 or later) before December 21, 2017. For more information, you can visit the settlement

website at www.SmartphonePerformanceSettlement.com.

The Court ordered this notice because you have a right to know about a proposed settlement

of class action lawsuits against Apple relating to certain iOS software that allegedly diminished

the performance of Apple devices, and about your options, before the Court decides whether

to approve the settlement. If the Court approves the settlement and after any appeals are

resolved, an administrator will make the payments that the settlement allows.

This notice explains the lawsuits, the settlement, your legal rights, what benefits are available,

who is eligible for them, and how to get them.

The Court in charge of the case is the United States District Court for the Northern District of

California, and the case is known as In re Apple Inc. Device Performance Litigation, Case No.

18-MD-2827-EJD. The people who sued are Plaintiffs, and the company they sued, Apple

Inc., is the Defendant. The proposed settlement also resolves similar class actions filed in

other federal districts of the United States, as well as a class action filed in Superior Court for

the State of California, County of San Francisco.

2. What is this lawsuit about?

In a consolidated class action lawsuit pending against Apple, Plaintiffs claimed that a

performance management feature introduced for iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, and SE devices

in iOS 10.2.1, and introduced for iPhone 7 and 7 Plus devices in iOS 11.2, diminished the

performance of some of those devices. Apple denies all allegations and is entering into this

settlement to avoid burdensome and costly litigation. Apple denies all allegations and is

entering into this settlement to avoid burdensome and costly litigation. The settlement is not

an admission of wrongdoing by Apple.

3. Why is this a class action?

In a class action, one or more people, called Named Plaintiffs, sued on behalf of all people

who purportedly have similar claims (called “Settlement Class Members”). Together, the

Named Plaintiffs and the other members of the Settlement Class make up the “Settlement

Class.” One court resolves the dispute for all members of the Settlement Class, except for

those who exclude themselves from the Class. United States District Court Judge Edward J.

Davila is in charge of this class action.

4. Why is there a settlement?

The Court did not decide the case in favor of Plaintiffs or Apple. Instead, both sides agreed to

a settlement. That way, they avoid the cost of a trial, and settlement benefits go to the

Settlement Class Members. The Named Plaintiffs and their attorneys (“Class Counsel”) think

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-2 Filed 02/28/20 Page 5 of 11

the settlement is in the best interests of the members of the Settlement Class.

WHO IS IN THE SETTLEMENT

To see if you are eligible for benefits, you first must determine whether you are a member of

the Settlement Class.

5. What is an eligible device?

iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, 7, 7 Plus, and/or SE devices that ran iOS 10.2.1 or later or iPhone

7 and 7 Plus devices that ran iOS 11.2 or later. Eligible members of the Settlement Class must

meet the other requirements described in this notice.

6. How do I know if I am part of the settlement?

You are a member of the Settlement Class if you are or were (1) a United States owner of an

iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, 7, 7 Plus, and/or SE device (2) that ran iOS 10.2.1 or later or, in

the case of iPhone 7 and 7 Plus devices, that ran iOS 11.2 or later before December 21, 2017,

and (3) you experienced diminished performance on your device(s). You must meet all three

criteria to be a member of the Settlement Class.

A United States owner is someone who owned, purchased, leased, or otherwise received an

eligible device, including for personal, work, or any other purposes, and whose eligible device

was shipped to the United States, its territories, and/or its possessions. The Settlement Class

does not include iPhone owners who are domiciled outside of the United States, its territories,

and/or its possessions.

7. Are there exceptions to being included?

The Settlement Class excludes Apple; any entity in which Apple has a controlling interest;

Apple’s directors, officers, and employees; Apple’s legal representatives, successors, and

assigns; members of the Court; all persons who submit valid requests to be excluded from the

settlement; and certain other individuals whose claims have already been adjudicated.

8. I’m still not sure if I am included.

If you are still not sure whether you are a member of the Settlement Class, you can visit the

Settlement Website at www.SmartphonePerformanceSettlement.com.

THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS—WHAT YOU GET

9. What does the settlement provide?

Apple will provide a cash payment per eligible device (calculated as set forth below) to each

Settlement Class Member who submits a declaration under penalty of perjury stating that they

are or were (1) a United States owner of an iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, 7, 7 Plus, and/or SE

device (2) that ran iOS 10.2.1 or later or, in the case of iPhone 7 and 7 Plus devices, that ran

iOS 11.2 or later before December 21, 2017, and (3) they experienced diminished performance

on the device(s).

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-2 Filed 02/28/20 Page 6 of 11

Amount of Cash Payment: The cash payment per eligible device depends on the actual

number of approved claims and other factors, including the award of attorneys’ fees and

expenses and named plaintiff service awards. Under the proposed settlement, Apple shall pay

a minimum of $310,000,000 (the “Floor”) and a maximum of $500,000,000 (the “Ceiling”).

Under no circumstances shall any of the Floor revert to Apple.

Apple will provide a cash payment of approximately $25 per eligible device, provided that

Apple will not pay more than $500 million in aggregate to the Settlement Class Members. If

the total value of approved claims submitted exceeds the $500 million Ceiling, the value of

each approved claim (per eligible device) will be reduced on a pro rata basis. Additionally,

under the proposed settlement, if the total value of approved claims submitted by Settlement

Class Members does not exceed the $310 million Floor, the value of each approved claim (per

eligible device) may be increased on a pro rata basis, up to a maximum of $500 per device.

For more details, please refer to the more detailed Settlement Agreement available at

www.SmartphonePerformanceSettlement.com.

10. What are the requirements to receive a settlement benefit?

To receive a settlement benefit, you must complete a valid Claim Form that includes, among

other things, your name, mailing address, and iPhone serial number. You also must declare

under penalty of perjury that you are or were: (1) a United States owner of an iPhone 6, 6

Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, 7, 7 Plus, and/or SE device (2) that ran iOS 10.2.1 or later or, in the case of

iPhone 7 and 7 Plus devices, that ran iOS 11.2 or later before December 21, 2017, and (3) you

experienced diminished performance on your device(s). If you have multiple eligible devices,

you must submit a separate Claim Form for each device.

If you satisfy these requirements, you will receive a cash payment for each valid Claim Form

you submit, based on the calculation explained above.

HOW YOU GET A SETTLEMENT BENEFIT—SUBMITTING A CLAIM FORM

11. How can I get a settlement benefit?

To qualify for a settlement benefit, you must submit a valid online Claim Form. This Claim

Form, including instructions on how to make a Claim, can be accessed at

www.SmartphonePerformanceSettlement.com. You can also request a Claim Form by calling

toll-free [phone].

You must read the instructions carefully, fill out the Claim Form as directed in the instructions,

and electronically sign the Claim Form. You must (a) submit the Claim electronically at

www.SmartphonePerformanceSettlement.com or (b) mail it to [mailing address]. The Claim

Form must be received by [date], 2020. If you fail to submit your Claim Form by the

deadline, your Claim will be rejected, and you will be deemed to have waived all rights

to receive any cash benefit under this settlement.

Please carefully follow all instructions on the Claim Form.

12. When would I get my settlement benefit?

The Court will hold a Final Hearing on [date], 2020 at [time], to decide whether to approve

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-2 Filed 02/28/20 Page 7 of 11

the settlement. The date of the Final Hearing may change without further notice. You should

check the Court’s Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) site at

https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov to confirm that the date has not been changed. The Final Hearing

will take place at the San Jose Courthouse, Courtroom 4, 280 South 1st Street, San Jose, CA

95113. If Judge Davila approves the settlement, there may be appeals. The appeal process

can take time, perhaps more than a year. If there is no appeal, your settlement benefit will be

processed promptly. Please be patient.

13. What am I giving up to get a settlement benefit?

Unless you submit a valid request to be excluded from the Settlement Class, you will be a

Settlement Class Member. If you remain a Settlement Class Member, you will be eligible for

a settlement benefit but you can’t sue, continue to sue, or be part of any other lawsuit against

Apple about the claims and allegations in this case. It also means that all of the Court’s orders

will apply to you and legally bind you.

EXCLUDING YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT

If you don’t want a payment from this settlement, but you want to keep the right to sue, or

continue to sue, Apple on your own about the claims and allegations in this case, then you

must take steps to get out of the Settlement Class. This is what it means to request to be

excluded from or “opt out” of the Settlement Class.

14. How do I get out of the settlement?

To request to be excluded from the settlement, you must send a letter saying that you want to

be excluded from the Settlement Class in In re Apple Inc. Device Performance Litigation, Case

No. 18-MD-2827-EJD. You must include your name, mailing address, telephone number, and

your signature. Your exclusion request must be received by no later than [date], 2020, [time]

to:

In re Apple Inc. Device Performance Litigation

ATTN: Claims Administrator

1650 Arch Street Suite 2210

Philadelphia, PA 19103

If you are excluded, you will not receive any settlement payment, and you cannot object to the

settlement. You will not be legally bound by anything that happens in this lawsuit. You may

be able to sue (or continue to sue) Apple in the future about the claims and allegations in this

case.

15. If I don’t request exclusion, can I sue Apple for the same thing later?

No. Unless you request to be excluded, you give up the right to sue Apple for the claims that

this settlement resolves.

16. If I request exclusion, can I get a settlement benefit?

No. If you request to be excluded, you may not submit a Claim Form to ask for any benefit.

But you will not lose any right you may have to sue, continue to sue, or be part of a different

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-2 Filed 02/28/20 Page 8 of 11

lawsuit against Apple about the claims and allegations in this case.

THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU

17. Do I have a lawyer in this case?

The Settlement Class is represented by Joseph W. Cotchett of Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy,

LLP and Laurence D. King of Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, who have been appointed by

the Court as Class Counsel for the Settlement Class. You will not be charged for these lawyers.

If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense.

18. How will the lawyers be paid?

Court-appointed Class Counsel, which have been prosecuting this litigation since its inception

in 2017, have not received any payment of attorneys’ fees for their representation of the

Settlement Class and have advanced all expenses necessarily incurred in order to prosecute the

Action. Class Counsel will ask the Court for attorneys’ fees in the amount not to exceed

[___]% of the $310,00,000 Floor. Class Counsel will also apply for reimbursement of

expenses paid on behalf of the Class in an amount not to exceed $[______] and Service Awards

to Named Plaintiffs of up to $[__] each. A copy of Class Counsel’s Motion for Attorneys’

Fees and Expenses and for Named Plaintiff Service Awards will be available at

www.SmartphonePerformanceSettlement.com by [date] 2020.

OBJECTING TO THE SETTLEMENT

You can tell the Court that you don’t agree with the settlement or some part of it.

19. How do I tell the Court that I don’t like the settlement?

If you’re a Settlement Class Member, you can object to the settlement if you don’t agree with

a part of it and give reasons you think the Court should not approve it. You can also object to

the requested award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses or Service Awards to the Named

Plaintiffs. The Court will consider your views. To object, you must send a letter stating that

you object to the settlement in In re Apple Inc. Device Performance Litigation, Case No. 18-

MD-2827-EJD. You must include the case name and number, your name, mailing address,

telephone number, your signature, a detailed statement of your specific objections, and proof

of membership in the Class, as well as any documents that you want the Court to consider.

The letter and any supporting documents must be delivered to and received by the following

addressees by [date] 2020: Any objections to Class Counsel’s request for attorneys’ fees and

expenses must be received by [date] 202[__].

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-2 Filed 02/28/20 Page 9 of 11

Court Class Counsel Defense Counsel

Clerk of the Court

United States District Court

Northern District of California

San Jose Division

280 South 1st Street

San Jose, CA 95113

Mark C. Molumphy, Esq.

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP

840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200

Burlingame, CA 94010

[email protected]

Laurence D. King, Esq.

Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP

1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1560

Oakland, CA 94612

[email protected]

Christopher Chorba, Esq.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

333 South Grand Avenue

Los Angeles, CA 90071

[email protected]

20. What’s the difference between objecting and requesting exclusion?

If you object, you are telling the Court that you disagree with something in the settlement. You

can object only if you stay in the Settlement Class. If you object but the Court still approves

the settlement, you will be bound by the settlement and can receive the benefits it provides.

If you request exclusion, you are telling the Court that you don’t want to be part of the

Settlement Class. You would then have no basis to object, because the settlement would no

longer affect you.

THE COURT’S FAIRNESS HEARING

The Court will hold a hearing to decide whether to approve the settlement. You may attend,

and you may ask to speak, but you don’t have to.

21. When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the settlement?

The Court will hold a Final Hearing at [time] on [date], 2020, at the United States District

Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, Courtroom 4 (5th Floor)

located at 280 South 1st Street, San Jose, California 95113. At the Final Hearing the Court

will consider whether the settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. If there are objections,

the Court will consider them. Judge Davila will listen to Settlement Class Members who have

asked to speak at the hearing. The Court will also consider how much money to award Class

Counsel and the amount of the Named Plaintiff Service Awards. After the Final Hearing, the

Court will decide whether to approve the settlement and will rule on Class Counsel’s Motion

for Attorneys’ Fees and/or Expenses, and for Named Plaintiff Service Awards.

We do not know how long these decisions will take. The date of the Final Hearing can change

without further notice. Please check www.SmartphonePerformanceSettlement.com for further

updates.

22. Do I need to come to the Final Hearing?

No. Class Counsel will answer questions about the settlement that Judge Davila may have.

But you are welcome to come at your own expense. If you send an objection, you don’t need

to come to the Final Hearing to talk about it. As long as your written objection was received

on time, the Court will consider it. You may also pay your own lawyer to attend, but it’s not

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-2 Filed 02/28/20 Page 10 of 11

necessary.

23. May I speak at the Final Hearing?

You may ask the Court for permission to speak at the Final Hearing. To do so, you must send

a letter stating that you intend to appear and speak at the Final Hearing in In re Apple Inc.

Device Performance Litigation, Case No. 18-MD-2827-EJD. You must include the case name

and number, your name, mailing address, telephone number, and your signature. Your letter

must be received by the Clerk of the Court and the Claims Administrator, at the two addresses

above by [date], 2020. You cannot speak at the Final Hearing if you requested to be excluded

from the Settlement Class.

IF YOU DO NOTHING

24. What happens if I do nothing at all?

If you do nothing, you will be a Settlement Class Member. You will not receive a benefit from

the settlement unless you file a valid Claim Form on time. If you submit a valid Claim Form

on time, you won’t be able to start a lawsuit, continue with a lawsuit, or be part of any other

lawsuit against Apple about the claims and allegations in this case.

GETTING MORE INFORMATION

25. Are there more details about the settlement?

This Class Notice summarizes the proposed settlement. More details are in a Settlement

Agreement. Copies of the Settlement Agreement and the pleadings and other documents

relating to the case, including motions for approval of the Settlement and awards of Attorneys’

Fees and Expenses and Service Awards, are on file at the United States District Court for the

Northern District of California, San Jose Division. The Settlement Agreement and other

important documents are also available on the Settlement Website at

www.SmartphonePerformanceSettlement.com.

In addition, you can access the Court docket in this case, for a fee, through the Court’s PACER

system at https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov. You can also visit the office of the Clerk of the Court

for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division,

located at 280 South 1st Street, Second Floor, San Jose, California, between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00

p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Court holidays.

26. How do I get more information?

You can visit the Settlement Website at www.SmartphonePerformanceSettlement.com, where

you will find answers to common questions about the settlement, a Claim Form, and other

information.

Questions may not be directed to the Court.

Date: [date], 2020

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-2 Filed 02/28/20 Page 11 of 11

EXHIBIT C

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-3 Filed 02/28/20 Page 1 of 4

LEGAL NOTICE

If you are or were a U.S. owner of an iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus,

and/or SE device that ran iOS 10.2.1 or later before December 21,

2017, and/or a U.S. owner of an iPhone 7 or 7 Plus device that ran

iOS 11.2 or later before December 21, 2017, you could be entitled to

benefits under a class action settlement.

WHAT’S THIS ABOUT?

In a consolidated class action lawsuit pending against Apple, Plaintiffs claimed that a

performance management feature introduced for iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, and SE devices in

iOS 10.2.1, and introduced for iPhone 7 and 7 Plus devices in iOS 11.2, diminished the

performance of some of those devices. Apple denies all allegations and is entering into this

settlement to avoid burdensome and costly litigation. The settlement is not an admission of

wrongdoing by Apple.

Under the settlement, Apple will pay a minimum of $310,000,000 and a maximum of

$500,000,000, depending on the number of claims submitted. If the settlement is approved by

the Court, your rights may be affected. The United States District Court for the Northern District

of California authorized this Summary Notice. The Court will have a Final Hearing to consider

whether to approve the settlement so that the benefits may be paid. This summary provides basic

information about the settlement.

WHO’S AFFECTED?

You are a member of the Settlement Class if you are or were (1) a United States owner of an

iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, 7, 7 Plus, and/or SE device (2) that ran iOS 10.2.1 or later or, in

the case of iPhone 7 and 7 Plus devices, that ran iOS 11.2 or later before December 21, 2017,

and (3) you experienced diminished performance on your device(s). You must meet all three

criteria to be a member of the Settlement Class.

WHAT BENEFIT CAN YOU GET FROM THE SETTLEMENT?

Apple will provide a cash payment per eligible device to each Class Member who submits a

declaration under penalty of perjury stating that they are or were (1) a United States owner of an

iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, 7, 7 Plus, and/or SE device (2) that ran iOS 10.2.1 or later or, in

the case of iPhone 7 and 7 Plus devices, that ran iOS 11.2 or later before December 21, 2017;

and (3) they experienced diminished performance on the device(s).

A United States owner is someone who owned, purchased, leased, or otherwise received an

eligible device, including for personal, work, or any other purposes, and whose eligible device

was shipped to the United States, its territories, and/or its possessions. The Settlement Class

does not include iPhone owners who are domiciled outside of the United States, its territories,

and/or its possessions.

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-3 Filed 02/28/20 Page 2 of 4

Amount of Cash Payment: Under the proposed settlement, Apple will provide a cash payment

of approximately $25 per eligible device. Please note that the actual cash payment per eligible

device may be greater than or less than $25, depending on the total number of approved claims

and other factors. The total payments to be made by Apple under the proposed settlement are

subject to a minimum and maximum as set forth in the more detailed Class Notice available at

www.SmartphonePerformanceSettlement.com.

HOW DO YOU GET A PAYMENT?

An online Claim Form package contains everything you need and is available at

www.SmartphonePerformanceSettlement.com. You may also submit a Claim Form by

clicking this link.

WHAT ARE YOUR OPTIONS AND WHAT ARE THE DEADLINES?

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

OPTION EXPLANATION DEADLINE

SUBMIT A CLAIM

FORM ONLINE OR

IN THE MAIL

The only way to get a payment under the

settlement.

[date]

EXCLUDE

YOURSELF

Get no payment under the settlement. This is the

only option that allows you to be a part of any

other lawsuit against Apple about the claims and

allegations in this case.

[date]

OBJECT TO THE

SETTLEMENT

Write to the Court about why you don’t like the

settlement.

[date]

OBJECT TO

ATTORNEYS’ FEES

AND/OR EXPENSES

Write to the Court about why you don’t like the

attorneys’ fees and/or expenses that Class

Counsel requests.

[date]

GO TO A HEARING Ask to speak in Court about the fairness of the

settlement.

[date]

DO NOTHING Get no payment under the settlement and give up

your right to compensation for the claims and

allegations in this case.

N/A

Please read the more detailed Class Notice, which is available at

www.SmartphonePerformanceSettlement.com, and decide whether you want to make a Claim.

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-3 Filed 02/28/20 Page 3 of 4

To claim a settlement benefit, your Claim Form must be received on or before [date], 2020. If

you do not claim a settlement benefit by this deadline, you will lose your right to obtain

this benefit.

If you don’t want to make a Claim and you don’t want to be legally bound by the settlement,

your request to be excluded must be received by [date], or you won’t be able to sue, or continue

to sue, Apple about the claims and allegations in this case. If you request to be excluded, you

will not be eligible to receive a payment from this settlement.

If you stay in the Settlement Class, you may object to the settlement. Objections to the

settlement must be received by [date]. Objections to Class Counsel’s request for Attorneys’

Fees and Expenses must be received by [date].

The more detailed Class Notice available at www.SmartphonePerformanceSettlement.com

explains how to request exclusion from the Settlement Class or object to the settlement. The

Court will hold a Final Hearing in this case (In re Apple Inc. Device Performance Litigation,

Case No. 18-MD-2827-EJD) on [date] at [time] to consider whether to approve (1) the

settlement and (2) Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses of up to $[___] million for Class Counsel, and

(3) Named Plaintiff Service Awards of up to $[___] each. The Final Hearing will take place at

the San Jose Courthouse, Courtroom 4, 280 South 1st Street, San Jose, CA 95113. You may

appear at the Final Hearing, but you don’t need to. The date of the Final Hearing may change

without further notice. You should check the Court’s Public Access to Court Electronic Records

(PACER) site, for a fee, at https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov to confirm that the date has not been

changed.

FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE SETTLEMENT

To obtain a Class Notice, Claim Form, copy of the settlement agreement, copies of motions for

settlement approval and attorneys’ fees, expenses and service awards, and any other important

documents in this case, go to www.SmartphonePerformanceSettlement.com or call toll-free

[number]. For more details, you also may write to Class Counsel at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy

LLP, Attn: Mark C. Molumphy, 840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200, Burlingame, California 94010

and/or Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Attn: Laurence D. King, 1999 Harrison Street, Suite

1560, Oakland, CA 94612.

In addition, you can access the Court docket in this case, for a fee, through the Court’s PACER

site at https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov. You can also visit the office of the Clerk of the Court for

the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, located

at 280 South 1

Street, Second Floor, San Jose, California, between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.,

Monday through Friday, excluding Court holidays.

BY ORDER OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-3 Filed 02/28/20 Page 4 of 4

EXHIBIT D

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-4 Filed 02/28/20 Page 1 of 8

[PROPOSED] ORDER CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS; GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS

ACTION SETTLEMENT; AND APPROVING FORM AND CONTENT OF CLASS NOTICE

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE: APPLE INC. DEVICE

PERFORMANCE LITIGATION,

CASE NO. 5:18-m

-02827-EJD

CLASS ACTION

[PROPOSED] ORDER CERTIFYING

SETTLEMENT CLASS; GRANTING

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS

ACTION SETTLEMENT; AND

APPROVING FORM AND CONTENT OF

CLASS NOTICE

This Document Relates To:

ALL ACTIONS.

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-4 Filed 02/28/20 Page 2 of 8

[PROPOSED] ORDER CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS; GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS

ACTION SETTLEMENT; AND APPROVING FORM AND CONTENT OF CLASS NOTICE

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

WHEREAS, the Named Plaintiffs and Defendant Apple Inc. entered into a Settlement

Agreement (Dkt. ___) on _________________, 2020, which, together with the exhibits and appendices

thereto, sets forth the terms and conditions for a proposed resolution of this litigation and for its

dismissal with prejudice;

WHEREAS, this Court has reviewed the Settlement entered into by the Parties, all exhibits

thereto, the record in this case, and the Parties’ arguments;

WHEREAS, this Court preliminarily finds, for the purpose of settlement only, that the

Settlement Class meets all the prerequisites of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 for class certification,

including numerosity, commonality, typicality, predominance of common issues, superiority, and that

the Named Plaintiffs and Class Counsel are adequate representatives of the Settlement Class;

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. All terms and definitions used herein have the same meanings as set forth in the

Settlement Agreement.

Preliminary Certification of Settlement Class for Purpose of Settlement Only

2. The Settlement is hereby preliminarily approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate such

that notice thereof should be given to members of the Settlement Class. Under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 23(b)(3), the Settlement Class, as set forth in paragraph 1.32 of the Settlement Agreement

and defined as follows, is preliminarily certified for the purpose of settlement only:

All former or current U.S. owners of iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, 7, 7 Plus, and

SE devices running iOS 10.2.1 or later (for iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, and SE

devices) or iOS 11.2 or later (for iPhone 7 and 7 Plus devices), and who ran these

iOS versions before December 21, 2017.

For purposes of this definition, “U.S. owners” shall include all individuals who owned, purchased,

leased, or otherwise received an eligible device, and individuals who otherwise used an eligible device

for personal, work, or any other purposes. An individual qualifies as a “U.S. owner” if his or her device

was shipped to the United States, its territories, and/or its possessions. The Settlement Class shall not

include iPhone owners who are domiciled outside of the United States, its territories, and/or its

possessions. Additionally, excluded from the Settlement Class are (a) directors, officers, and

employees of Apple or its subsidiaries and affiliated companies, as well as Apple’s legal

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-4 Filed 02/28/20 Page 3 of 8

[PROPOSED] ORDER CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS; GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS

ACTION SETTLEMENT; AND APPROVING FORM AND CONTENT OF CLASS NOTICE

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns, (b) the Court, the Court staff, as well as any appellate

court to which this matter is ever assigned and its staff, (c) any of the individuals identified in paragraph

1.36 of the Settlement Agreement, as well as their legal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns,

(d) Defense Counsel, as well as their immediate family members, legal representatives, heirs,

successors, or assigns, and (e) any other individuals whose claims already have been adjudicated to a

final judgment.

3. If the Settlement Agreement is not finally approved by this Court, or if such final

approval is reversed or materially modified on appeal by any court, this Order (including but not limited

to the certification of the class) shall be vacated, null and void, and of no force or effect, and Apple and

Plaintiffs shall be entitled to make any arguments for or against certification for litigation purposes.

4. Class Counsel and the Named Plaintiffs are appointed as adequate representatives of the

Settlement Class. Joseph W. Cotchett (of Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP, 840 Malcolm Road, Suite

200, Burlingame, California 94010) and Laurence D. King (of Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, 1999

Harrison Street, Suite 1560, Oakland, California 94612) are hereby appointed as Interim Co-Lead Class

Counsel to represent the proposed Settlement Class.

Notice to the Settlement Class

5. The Court approves the Claim Form, Class Notice, and Summary Notice, which are

attached to the Settlement Agreement as Exhibits A, B, and C, respectively, and finds that their

dissemination substantially in the manner and form set forth in the Settlement Agreement meets the

requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and due process, constitutes the best notice

practicable under the circumstances, and is reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise

members of the Settlement Class of the pendency of the Actions, the effect of the proposed Settlement

(including the releases contained therein), the anticipated Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and/or Expenses

and for Service Awards, and their rights to participate in, opt out of, or object to any aspect of the

proposed Settlement.

6. By _________________, 2020 [thirty (30) days from the entry of this Preliminary

Approval Order], Apple shall, for the purpose of facilitating the distribution of the Summary Notice,

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-4 Filed 02/28/20 Page 4 of 8

[PROPOSED] ORDER CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS; GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS

ACTION SETTLEMENT; AND APPROVING FORM AND CONTENT OF CLASS NOTICE

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

provide the Settlement Administrator with the names, email addresses, mailing addresses, and serial

numbers for the members of the Settlement Class.

7. By _________________, 2020 [seventy-five (75) days from the date specified in

paragraph 6 above], the Settlement Administrator shall complete the distribution of the email and/or

postcard notices to the members of the Settlement Class, and establish the Settlement Website which

shall contain all documents relating to the settlement, including the Settlement Agreement, the Class

Notice, the Summary Notice, the Claim Form, and all motion papers and Court orders relating to

preliminary and final approval of the Settlement. The Settlement Administrator shall send the

Summary Notice via email to each member of the Settlement Class for whom Apple has a valid email

address for the account of record on the Apple ID. The Settlement Administrator shall mail a postcard

notice, substantially similar to the Summary Notice, to all members of the Settlement Class for whom

Apple does not have a valid email address.

Settlement Administration

8. The Court appoints Angeion Group to serve as the Settlement Administrator. Angeion

Group shall supervise and administer the notice procedures, establish and operate the Settlement

Website, administer the claims processes, distribute cash payments according to the processes and

criteria set forth in the Settlement Agreement, and perform any other duties that are reasonably

necessary and/or provided for in the Settlement Agreement.

9. All reasonable costs of notice and costs of administering the Settlement shall be paid by

Apple or from the Residual, if any, as contemplated by paragraph 5.3.1 of the Settlement Agreement.

10. Settlement Class Members who wish to make a Claim must do so by submitting a Claim

Form by _________________, 2020 [forty-five (45) days from the date specified in paragraph 7

above], in accordance with the instructions contained therein. The Settlement Administrator shall

determine the eligibility of Claims submitted and allocate the Settlement Funds in accordance with the

Settlement Agreement.

11. Settlement Class Members who wish to object to the Settlement must provide: (a) a

detailed statement of the Settlement Class Member’s specific objections to any matters before the

Court; (b) the grounds for such objections and the reason such Settlement Class Member desires to

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-4 Filed 02/28/20 Page 5 of 8

[PROPOSED] ORDER CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS; GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS

ACTION SETTLEMENT; AND APPROVING FORM AND CONTENT OF CLASS NOTICE

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

appear and be heard; and (c) proof of membership in the Settlement Class, as well as all other materials

the Settlement Class Member wants the Court to consider. The objections must be sent to the following

addresses, and received by _________________, 2020 [forty-five (45) days from the date specified in

paragraph 7 above]:

Court Class Counsel Defense Counsel

Clerk of the Cour

United States District Court

Northern District of California

San Jose Division

280 South 1st Street

San Jose, CA 95113

Laurence D. King, Esq.

Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP

1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1560

Oakland, CA 94612

[email protected]

Mark Molumphy, Esq.

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP

840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200

Burlingame, CA 94010

[email protected]

Christopher Chorba, Esq.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

333 South Grand Avenue

Los Angeles, CA 90071

[email protected]

12. Any putative member of the Settlement Class who seeks to be excluded from the

Settlement Class must submit a request for exclusion, which must be received by the Claims

Administrator by _________________, 2020 [forty-five (45) days from the date specified in paragraph

7 above]:

Claims Administrator

n re Apple Inc. Device Performance Litigation

ATTN: Claims Administrator

1650 Arch Street, Suite 2210

Philadel

hia, PA 19103

Any member of the Settlement Class who does not file a valid and timely request for exclusion shall

be bound by the final judgment dismissing the MDL Action on the merits with prejudice.

Final Approval Hearing

13. The Final Hearing shall be held by the Court on _________________, 202__, beginning

at ___:____ __.m., to determine whether the requirements for certification of the Settlement Class have

been met; whether the proposed settlement of the Actions on the terms set forth in the Settlement should

be approved as fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the Settlement Class Members;

whether Class Counsel’s motion or application for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses and application for

the Named Plaintiff Service Awards should be approved; and whether final judgment approving the

Settlement and dismissing the Actions on the merits with prejudice against the Named Plaintiffs and

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-4 Filed 02/28/20 Page 6 of 8

[PROPOSED] ORDER CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS; GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS

ACTION SETTLEMENT; AND APPROVING FORM AND CONTENT OF CLASS NOTICE

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

all other Settlement Class Members should be entered. The Final Hearing may, without further notice

to the Settlement Class Members (except those who have filed timely and valid objections and

requested to speak at the Final Hearing), be continued or adjourned by order of the Court.

14. Objections by any Settlement Class Member to (a) the certification of the Settlement

Class; (b) the Settlement; and/or (c) the entry of the Final Approval Order and Final Judgment, shall

be considered by the Court at the Final Hearing only if such Settlement Class Member files with the

Court a notice of his or her objections, submits documentary proof that he or she is a Settlement Class

Member, states the basis for such objections, and serves copies of the foregoing and any other papers

in support of such objections on Defense Counsel and Class Counsel, as provided in paragraph 11.

15. By _________________, 202__ [not less than sixty-five (65) days from the date

specified in paragraph 13 above], Class Counsel shall file all papers in support of the application for

the Final Approval Order and Final Judgment, any Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and/or Expenses and/or

for Named Plaintiff Service Awards, and/or any response to any valid and timely objections with the

Court, and shall serve copies of such papers upon Defense Counsel and upon any objectors who have

complied with paragraphs 11 and 14 of this Order. All opposition papers shall be filed by

_________________, 202__ [not less than thirty-five (35) days from when Class Counsel file their

Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and/or Expenses], and any reply papers shall be filed by

_________________, 202__.

16. Objections by any Settlement Class Member to Class Counsel’s request for Attorneys’

Fees and/or Expenses shall be considered by the Court at the Final Hearing only if such Settlement

Class Member files with the Court a notice of his or her objections, submits documentary proof that he

or she is a Settlement Class Member, states the basis for such objections, and serves copies of the

foregoing and any other papers in support of such objections on Defense Counsel and Class Counsel,

as provided in paragraph 11, by _________________, 202__ [not less than thirty-five (35) days from

when Class Counsel file their Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and/or Expenses, as specified in paragraph

15 above].

17. Class Counsel’s motion or application for an award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses,

and costs and for the Named Plaintiff Service Awards will be considered separately from the fairness,

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-4 Filed 02/28/20 Page 7 of 8

[PROPOSED] ORDER CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS; GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS

ACTION SETTLEMENT; AND APPROVING FORM AND CONTENT OF CLASS NOTICE

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement. Any appeal from any order relating solely to Class

Counsel’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and/or Expenses, and/or for Named Plaintiff Service Awards, or

any reversal or modification of any such order, shall not operate to terminate, vacate, or cancel the

Settlement.

18. Defense Counsel and Class Counsel are hereby authorized to utilize all reasonable

procedures in connection with the administration of the Settlement which are not materially

inconsistent with either this Order or the Settlement Agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ________________, 2020

Hon. Edward J. Davila

United States District Court

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-4 Filed 02/28/20 Page 8 of 8

EXHIBIT E

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-5 Filed 02/28/20 Page 1 of 8

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; AWARDING

ATTORNEYS’ FEES, EXPENSES, AND NAMED PLAINTIFF SERVICE AWARDS;

AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE: APPLE INC. DEVICE

PERFORMANCE LITIGATION,

CASE NO. 5:18-m

-02827-EJD

CLASS ACTION

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL

APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION

SETTLEMENT; AWARDING ATTORNEYS’

FEES, EXPENSES, AND NAMED

PLAINTIFF SERVICE AWARDS; AND

ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT

This Document Relates To:

ALL ACTIONS.

Case 5:18-md-02827-EJD Document 416-5 Filed 02/28/20 Page 2 of 8

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; AWARDING

ATTORNEYS’ FEES, EXPENSES, AND NAMED PLAINTIFF SERVICE AWARDS;

AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT

CASE NO. 5:18-MD-02827-EJD

WHEREAS, the Court held a Final Hearing to consider approval of this class action settlement

on _________________, 2020. The Court has considered the Settlement Agreement (Dkt. ___), the

record in the MDL Action, and the Parties’ arguments and authorities.

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. For purposes of this Order, the Court adopts the terms and definitions set forth in the

Settlement Agreement.

2. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the MDL Action, the Named

Plaintiffs, the Settlement Class Members, and Defendant Apple Inc.

3. The Court finds that the Class Notice constituted the best notice practicable under the

circumstances to all Settlement Class Members and fully complied with the requirements of Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and due process.

4. The Court finds that, for purposes of the Settlement only, all prerequisites for

maintenance of a class action set forth in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a) and (b)(3) are satisfied.

The Court certifies the following Settlement Class for purposes of Settlement only:

All former or current U.S. owners of iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, 7, 7 Plus, and SE

devices running iOS 10.2.1 or later (for iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6s, 6s Plus, and SE devices)

or iOS 11.2 or later (for iPhone 7 and 7 Plus devices), and who ran these iOS versions

before December 21, 2017.