301
Policy and Procedures on the Appointment of Tenure Track Faculty
Including the Award of Service Credit
October 24, 2023
301 - 2
and/or probationary faculty of the department
4
(except in the case of insufficiency, as
articulated in III.5) provided that at least two-thirds of the membership of the committee
consists of full-time tenured faculty.
4. The department may form a committee consisting of all full-time tenured faculty or all full-time
tenured and probationary faculty members in the department.
5
If the department forms a
committee consisting of all full-time tenured and probationary faculty, at least two-thirds of the
membership of the committee shall be composed of tenured faculty. If not part of the search
committee, independent recommendations will be written by the department chair and the
department search committee. If serving on the search committee, the committee’s
recommendation will also serve as the department chair’s recommendation.
5. When the department or program has insufficient
6
full-time tenured and/or probationary
members available to form a committee, the department faculty shall elect other tenured
and/or probationary faculty available to serve on the committee as a voting member. Tenured
and/or probationary faculty not serving on the committee within the department or unit may
review the applications and provide input
7
to the committee but may not participate in search
committee deliberations and/or vote in search committee meetings.
6. All search committees are required to have a non-voting EEO designee as a member of the
committee. The campus EEO Officer shall appoint an EEO designee from a list of those
eligible to serve.
7. The search committee shall elect a chair from its membership.
8. The chair of the search committee is responsible for:
a. Ensuring that each member of the search committee has been advised of law, CSU
policy, and university policies which bear upon the search and nomination process,
b. Ensuring that all policies and procedures regarding the search are adhered to by the
members of the committee and the department,
c. Ensuring that the search is conducted in full compliance with the law and university
policy,
d. Meeting regularly with the department chair to keep the chair informed regarding the
progress of the search,
e. Acting as a liaison between the committee and the appropriate administrative offices,
f. Ensuring that copies of all applications, evaluations, correspondence, including email
communications, from and to candidates are retained and secured,
g. Maintaining ongoing contacts/correspondence with active candidates,
h. Obtaining prior authorization before inviting candidates for on-campus visits,
4
In departments with multiple programs, the program faculty shall constitute a majority of the committee for
hiring new faculty in that program.
5
Whether a small committee or a committee of the whole, each member of the search committee is required
to read and evaluate all the applications.
6
The term ‘insufficient’ may refer both to numerical insufficiency (i.e., a department lacking the personnel
needed to compose a search committee while satisfying policy requirements) as well as to representational
insufficiency. This latter phenomenon refers to departments that lack the representative identities,
disciplinary backgrounds, or perspectives needed to compose a search committee for a specific position
whose successful filling would benefit from the inclusion of those identities, backgrounds, or perspectives.
The interpretation of ‘insufficient’ shall be left to individual departments to decide upon consultation with the
dean.
7
Input provided to the committee by individual faculty members in the department regarding candidates
should be committed to writing, identified by source, and placed in the appropriate application file.