CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSEH4870 September 29, 2023
THE JOURNAL
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu-
ant to clause 8 of rule XX, the unfin-
ished business is the question on agree-
ing to the Speaker’s approval of the
Journal, which the Chair will put de
novo.
The question is on the Speaker’s ap-
proval of the Journal.
Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Jour-
nal stands approved.
f
EXPRESSING THE PROFOUND SOR-
ROW OF THE HOUSE OF REP-
RESENTATIVES ON THE DEATH
OF THE HONORABLE DIANNE
GOLDMAN BERMAN FEINSTEIN
Ms. PELOSI. Mr. Speaker, with deep
condolences and sympathy to Senator
F
EINSTEIN
’s daughter Katherine and
her granddaughter Eileen, and the en-
tire Feinstein family, I offer a privi-
leged bereavement resolution and ask
for its immediate consideration.
The Clerk read the resolution, as fol-
lows:
H. R
ES
. 742
Resolved, That the House has heard with
profound sorrow of the death of the Honor-
able Dianne Goldman Berman Feinstein, a
Senator from the State of California.
Resolved, That the Clerk communicate
these resolutions to the Senate and transmit
a copy thereof to the family of the deceased.
Resolved, That when the House adjourns
today, it adjourn as a further mark of re-
spect to the memory of the deceased Sen-
ator.
The resolution was agreed to.
A motion to reconsider was laid on
the table.
f
CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS
AND BORDER SECURITY EN-
HANCEMENT ACT, 2024
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker,
pursuant to House Resolution 741, I
call up the bill (H.R. 5525) making con-
tinuing appropriations for fiscal year
2024, and for other purposes, and ask
for its immediate consideration in the
House.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr.
B
OST
). Pursuant to House Resolution
741, the amendments printed in House
Report 118–230 are adopted, and the
bill, as amended, is considered read.
The text of the bill is as follows:
H.R. 5525
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Rep-
resentatives of the United States of America in
Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Spending
Reduction and Border Security Act’’.
SEC. 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS.
The table of contents for this Act is as fol-
lows:
Sec. 1. Short title.
Sec. 2. Table of contents.
Sec. 3. References.
DIVISION A—CONTINUING
APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2024
DIVISION B—OTHER MATTERS
Sec. 101. Statutory PAYGO scorecards.
Sec. 102. Senate PAYGO scorecards.
Sec. 103. Classification of budgetary effects.
DIVISION C—BORDER SECURITY
Sec. 101. Definitions.
Sec. 102. Border wall construction.
Sec. 103. Strengthening the requirements for
barriers along the southern bor-
der.
Sec. 104. Border and port security tech-
nology investment plan.
Sec. 105. Border security technology pro-
gram management.
Sec. 106. U.S. Customs and Border Protec-
tion technology upgrades.
Sec. 107. U.S. Customs and Border Protec-
tion personnel.
Sec. 108. Anti-Border Corruption Act reau-
thorization.
Sec. 109. Establishment of workload staffing
models for U.S. Border Patrol
and Air and Marine Operations
of CBP.
Sec. 110. Operation Stonegarden.
Sec. 111. Air and Marine Operations flight
hours.
Sec. 112. Eradication of carrizo cane and salt
cedar.
Sec. 113. Border patrol strategic plan.
Sec. 114. U.S. Customs and Border Protec-
tion spiritual readiness.
Sec. 115. Restrictions on funding.
Sec. 116. Collection of DNA and biometric
information at the border.
Sec. 117. Eradication of narcotic drugs and
formulating effective new tools
to address yearly losses of life;
ensuring timely updates to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection
field manuals.
Sec. 118. Publication by U.S. Customs and
Border Protection of oper-
ational statistics.
Sec. 119. Alien criminal background checks.
Sec. 120. Prohibited identification docu-
ments at airport security
checkpoints; notification to im-
migration agencies.
Sec. 121. Prohibition against any COVID–19
vaccine mandate or adverse ac-
tion against DHS employees.
Sec. 122. CBP One app limitation.
Sec. 123. Report on Mexican drug cartels.
Sec. 124. GAO study on costs incurred by
States to secure the southwest
border.
Sec. 125. Report by Inspector General of the
Department of Homeland Secu-
rity.
Sec. 126. Offsetting authorizations of appro-
priations.
Sec. 127. Report to Congress on foreign ter-
rorist organizations.
Sec. 128. Assessment by Inspector General of
the Department of Homeland
Security on the mitigation of
unmanned aircraft systems at
the southwest border.
DIVISION D—IMMIGRATION
ENFORCEMENT AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS
TITLE I—ASYLUM REFORM AND BORDER
PROTECTION
Sec. 101. Safe third country.
Sec. 102. Credible fear interviews.
Sec. 103. Clarification of asylum eligibility.
Sec. 104. Exceptions.
Sec. 105. Employment authorization.
Sec. 106. Asylum fees.
Sec. 107. Rules for determining asylum eligi-
bility.
Sec. 108. Firm resettlement.
Sec. 109. Notice concerning frivolous asylum
applications.
Sec. 110. Technical amendments.
Sec. 111. Requirement for procedures relat-
ing to certain asylum applica-
tions.
TITLE II—BORDER SAFETY AND
MIGRANT PROTECTION
Sec. 201. Inspection of applicants for admis-
sion.
Sec. 202. Operational detention facilities.
TITLE III—PREVENTING UNCONTROLLED
MIGRATION FLOWS IN THE WESTERN
HEMISPHERE
Sec. 301. United States policy regarding
Western Hemisphere coopera-
tion on immigration and asy-
lum.
Sec. 302. Negotiations by Secretary of State.
Sec. 303. Mandatory briefings on United
States efforts to address the
border crisis.
TITLE IV—ENSURING UNITED FAMILIES
AT THE BORDER
Sec. 401. Clarification of standards for fam-
ily detention.
TITLE V—PROTECTION OF CHILDREN
Sec. 501. Findings.
Sec. 502. Repatriation of unaccompanied
alien children.
Sec. 503. Special immigrant juvenile status
for immigrants unable to re-
unite with either parent.
Sec. 504. Rule of construction.
TITLE VI—VISA OVERSTAYS PENALTIES
Sec. 601. Expanded penalties for illegal
entry or presence.
TITLE VII—IMMIGRATION PAROLE
REFORM
Sec. 701. Immigration parole reform.
Sec. 702. Implementation.
Sec. 703. Cause of action.
Sec. 704. Severability.
SEC. 3. REFERENCES.
Except as expressly provided otherwise,
any reference to ‘‘this Act’’ contained in any
division of this Act shall be treated as refer-
ring only to the provisions of that division.
DIVISION A—CONTINUING
APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2024
The following sums are hereby appro-
priated, out of any money in the Treasury
not otherwise appropriated, and out of appli-
cable corporate or other revenues, receipts,
and funds, for the several departments, agen-
cies, corporations, and other organizational
units of Government for fiscal year 2024, and
for other purposes, namely:
S
EC
. 101. (a) Such amounts as may be nec-
essary, at a rate for operations as provided
in the applicable appropriations Acts for fis-
cal year 2023 and under the authority and
conditions provided in such Acts, for con-
tinuing projects or activities (including the
costs of direct loans and loan guarantees)
that are not otherwise specifically provided
for in this Act, that were conducted in fiscal
year 2023, and for which appropriations,
funds, or other authority were made avail-
able in the following appropriations Acts:
(1) The Agriculture, Rural Development,
Food and Drug Administration, and Related
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2023 (division A
of Public Law 117–328).
(2) The Commerce, Justice, Science, and
Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2023
(division B of Public Law 117–328).
(3) The Department of Defense Appropria-
tions Act, 2023 (division C of Public Law 117–
328).
(4) The Energy and Water Development and
Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2023
(division D of Public Law 117–328), except the
first proviso under the heading ‘‘Department
of Energy—Energy Programs—SPR Petro-
leum Account’’.
(5) The Financial Services and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2023 (divi-
sion E of Public Law 117–328).
(6) The Department of Homeland Security
Appropriations Act, 2023 (division F of Public
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\K29SE7.024 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSE H4871 September 29, 2023
Law 117–328), including title III of division O
of Public Law 117–328.
(7) The Department of the Interior, Envi-
ronment, and Related Agencies Appropria-
tions Act, 2023 (division G of Public Law 117–
328).
(8) The Departments of Labor, Health and
Human Services, and Education, and Related
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2023 (division H
of Public Law 117–328).
(9) The Legislative Branch Appropriations
Act, 2023 (division I of Public Law 117–328).
(10) The Military Construction, Veterans
Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations
Act, 2023 (division J of Public Law 117–328).
(11) The Department of State, Foreign Op-
erations, and Related Programs Appropria-
tions Act, 2023 (division K of Public Law 117–
328).
(12) The Transportation, Housing and
Urban Development, and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act, 2023 (division L of Public
Law 117–328).
(b) The rate for operations provided by sub-
section (a) is hereby reduced by 29.88565 per-
cent, so that the total amount of annualized
discretionary budget authority for fiscal
year 2024 is equal to $1,470,979,000,000: Pro-
vided, That the reduction in this subsection
shall not apply to the rate for operations
provided for the national defense budget
function (050), the Department of Veterans
Affairs, the Department of Homeland Secu-
rity, or amounts designated as being for dis-
aster relief pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(D) of
the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit
Control Act of 1985.
S
EC
. 102. (a) No appropriation or funds
made available or authority granted pursu-
ant to section 101 for the Department of De-
fense shall be used for:
(1) the new production of items not funded
for production in fiscal year 2023 or prior
years;
(2) the increase in production rates above
those sustained with fiscal year 2023 funds;
or
(3) the initiation, resumption, or continu-
ation of any project, activity, operation, or
organization (defined as any project, sub-
project, activity, budget activity, program
element, and subprogram within a program
element, and for any investment items de-
fined as a P–1 line item in a budget activity
within an appropriation account and an R–1
line item that includes a program element
and subprogram element within an appro-
priation account) for which appropriations,
funds, or other authority were not available
during fiscal year 2023.
(b) No appropriation or funds made avail-
able or authority granted pursuant to sec-
tion 101 for the Department of Defense shall
be used to initiate multi-year procurements
utilizing advance procurement funding for
economic order quantity procurement unless
specifically appropriated later.
S
EC
. 103. Appropriations made by section
101 shall be available to the extent and in the
manner that would be provided by the perti-
nent appropriations Act.
S
EC
. 104. Except as otherwise provided in
section 102, no appropriation or funds made
available or authority granted pursuant to
section 101 shall be used to initiate or re-
sume any project or activity for which ap-
propriations, funds, or other authority were
not available during fiscal year 2023.
S
EC
. 105. Appropriations made and author-
ity granted pursuant to this Act shall cover
all obligations or expenditures incurred for
any project or activity during the period for
which funds or authority for such project or
activity are available under this Act.
S
EC
. 106. Unless otherwise provided for in
this Act or in the applicable appropriations
Act for fiscal year 2024, appropriations and
funds made available and authority granted
pursuant to this Act shall be available until
whichever of the following first occurs:
(1) The enactment into law of an appro-
priation for any project or activity provided
for in this Act.
(2) The enactment into law of the applica-
ble appropriations Act for fiscal year 2024
without any provision for such project or ac-
tivity.
(3) October 31, 2023.
S
EC
. 107. Expenditures made pursuant to
this Act shall be charged to the applicable
appropriation, fund, or authorization when-
ever a bill in which such applicable appro-
priation, fund, or authorization is contained
is enacted into law.
S
EC
. 108. Appropriations made and funds
made available by or authority granted pur-
suant to this Act may be used without re-
gard to the time limitations for submission
and approval of apportionments set forth in
section 1513 of title 31, United States Code,
but nothing in this Act may be construed to
waive any other provision of law governing
the apportionment of funds.
S
EC
. 109. Notwithstanding any other provi-
sion of this Act, except section 106, for those
programs that would otherwise have high
initial rates of operation or complete dis-
tribution of appropriations at the beginning
of fiscal year 2024 because of distributions of
funding to States, foreign countries, grant-
ees, or others, such high initial rates of oper-
ation or complete distribution shall not be
made, and no grants shall be awarded for
such programs funded by this Act that would
impinge on final funding prerogatives.
S
EC
. 110. This Act shall be implemented so
that only the most limited funding action of
that permitted in the Act shall be taken in
order to provide for continuation of projects
and activities.
S
EC
. 111. (a) For entitlements and other
mandatory payments whose budget author-
ity was provided in appropriations Acts for
fiscal year 2023, and for activities under the
Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, activities
shall be continued at the rate to maintain
program levels under current law, under the
authority and conditions provided in the ap-
plicable appropriations Act for fiscal year
2023, to be continued through the date speci-
fied in section 106(3).
(b) Notwithstanding section 106, obliga-
tions for mandatory payments due on or
about the first day of any month that begins
after October 2023 but not later than 30 days
after the date specified in section 106(3) may
continue to be made, and funds shall be
available for such payments.
S
EC
. 112. Amounts made available under
section 101 for civilian personnel compensa-
tion and benefits in each department and
agency may be apportioned up to the rate for
operations necessary to avoid furloughs
within such department or agency, con-
sistent with the applicable appropriations
Act for fiscal year 2023, except that such au-
thority provided under this section shall not
be used until after the department or agency
has taken all necessary actions to reduce or
defer non-personnel-related administrative
expenses.
S
EC
. 113. Funds appropriated by this Act
may be obligated and expended notwith-
standing section 10 of Public Law 91–672 (22
U.S.C. 2412), section 15 of the State Depart-
ment Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C.
2680), section 313 of the Foreign Relations
Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995
(22 U.S.C. 6212), and section 504(a)(1) of the
National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C.
3094(a)(1)).
S
EC
. 114. (a) Each amount incorporated by
reference in this Act that was previously
designated by the Congress as an emergency
requirement pursuant to section 4001(a)(1) of
S. Con. Res. 14 (117th Congress), the concur-
rent resolution on the budget for fiscal year
2022, and section 1(e) of H. Res. 1151 (117th
Congress), as engrossed in the House of Rep-
resentatives on June 8, 2022, is designated by
the Congress as an emergency requirement
pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A) of the Bal-
anced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control
Act of 1985.
(b) Each amount incorporated by reference
in this Act that was previously designated as
being for disaster relief pursuant to a con-
current resolution on the budget in the Sen-
ate and section 1(f) of H. Res. 1151 (117th Con-
gress), as engrossed in the House of Rep-
resentatives on June 8, 2022, is designated by
the Congress as being for disaster relief pur-
suant to section 251(b)(2)(D) of such Act.
(c) This section shall become effective im-
mediately upon enactment of this Act, and
shall remain in effect through the date in
section 106(3).
S
EC
. 115. (a) Rescissions or cancellations of
discretionary budget authority that con-
tinue pursuant to section 101 in Treasury Ap-
propriations Fund Symbols (TAFS)—
(1) to which other appropriations are not
provided by this Act, but for which there is
a current applicable TAFS that does receive
an appropriation in this Act; or
(2) which are no-year TAFS and receive
other appropriations in this Act,
may be continued instead by reducing the
rate for operations otherwise provided by
section 101 for such current applicable TAFS,
as long as doing so does not impinge on the
final funding prerogatives of the Congress.
(b) Rescissions or cancellations described
in subsection (a) shall continue in an amount
equal to the lesser of—
(1) the amount specified for rescission or
cancellation in the applicable appropriations
Act referenced in section 101 of this Act; or
(2) the amount of balances available, as of
October 1, 2023, from the funds specified for
rescission or cancellation in the applicable
appropriations Act referenced in section 101
of this Act.
(c) No later than October 11, 2023, the Di-
rector of the Office of Management and
Budget shall provide to the Committees on
Appropriations of the House of Representa-
tives and the Senate a comprehensive list of
the rescissions or cancellations that will
continue pursuant to section 101: Provided,
That the information in such comprehensive
list shall be periodically updated to reflect
any subsequent changes in the amount of
balances available, as of October 1, 2023, from
the funds specified for rescission or cancella-
tion in the applicable appropriations Act ref-
erenced in section 101, and such updates shall
be transmitted to the Committees on Appro-
priations of the House of Representatives
and the Senate upon request.
S
EC
. 116. Amounts made available by sec-
tion 101 for ‘‘Farm Service Agency—Agricul-
tural Credit Insurance Fund Program Ac-
count’’ may be apportioned up to the rate for
operations necessary to accommodate ap-
proved applications for direct and guaran-
teed farm ownership loans, as authorized by
7 U.S.C. 1922 et seq.
S
EC
. 117. Amounts made available by sec-
tion 101 to the Department of Agriculture for
‘‘Rural Housing Service—Rental Assistance
Program’’ may be apportioned up to the rate
for operations necessary to maintain activi-
ties as authorized by section 521(a)(2) of the
Housing Act of 1949.
S
EC
. 118. Section 260 of the Agricultural
Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1636i) and
section 942 of the Livestock Mandatory Re-
porting Act of 1999 (7 U.S.C. 1635 note; Public
Law 106–78) shall be applied by substituting
the date specified in section 106(3) of this Act
for ‘‘September 30, 2023’’.
S
EC
. 119. Notwithstanding sections 102 and
104 of this Act, amounts made available by
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.015 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSEH4872 September 29, 2023
section 101(3) for the Department of Defense
may be apportioned up to the rate for oper-
ations necessary to facilitate the programs
and activities set forth in H.R. 4365, the De-
partment of Defense Appropriations Act,
2024, reported by the House Committee on
Appropriations on June 27, 2023, subject to
the terms and conditions therein.
S
EC
. 120. Notwithstanding sections 102 and
104 of this Act, amounts made available by
section 101 to the Department of Defense for
‘‘Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy’’ shall
be available for the procurement of one Co-
lumbia Class Submarine.
S
EC
. 121. During the period covered by this
Act, section 714(b)(2)(B) of title 10, United
States Code, shall be applied by substituting
‘‘four years’’ for ‘‘two years’’.
S
EC
. 122. In addition to amounts otherwise
provided by section 101, amounts are pro-
vided for ‘‘Department of Energy—Energy
Programs—Nuclear Energy’’ at a rate for op-
erations of $220,000,000: Provided, That
amounts are provided for necessary expenses
related to Risk Reduction for Future Dem-
onstrations at a rate for operations of
$120,000,000 and Advanced Nuclear Fuel
Availability at a rate for operations of
$100,000,000.
S
EC
. 123. Amounts made available by sec-
tion 101 for ‘‘Small Business Administra-
tion—Business Loans Program Account’’
may be apportioned up to the rate for oper-
ations necessary to accommodate increased
demand for commitments for general busi-
ness loans authorized under paragraphs (1)
through (35) of section 7(a) of the Small Busi-
ness Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)), for commitments
to guarantee trust certificates authorized by
section 5(g) of the Small Business Act (15
U.S.C. 634(g)), for commitments to guarantee
loans under section 503 of the Small Business
Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 697), and for
commitments to guarantee loans for deben-
tures under section 303(b) of the Small Busi-
ness Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 683(b)).
S
EC
. 124. Notwithstanding any other provi-
sion of this Act, except section 106, the Dis-
trict of Columbia may expend local funds
made available under the heading ‘‘District
of Columbia—District of Columbia Funds’’
for such programs and activities under the
District of Columbia Appropriations Act,
2023 (title IV of division E of Public Law 117–
328) at the rate set forth in the Fiscal Year
2024 Local Budget Act of 2023 (D.C. Bill 25–
161), as modified as of the date of enactment
of this Act.
S
EC
. 125. Amounts made available by sec-
tion 101 to the Department of Homeland Se-
curity under the heading ‘‘Federal Emer-
gency Management Agency—Disaster Relief
Fund’’ may be apportioned up to the rate for
operations necessary to carry out response
and recovery activities under the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency As-
sistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.).
S
EC
. 126. Amounts provided by section 101
shall not be made available to utilize the
U.S. Customs and Border Protection CBP
One Application, or any successor applica-
tion, to facilitate the parole of any alien into
the United States.
S
EC
. 127. (a) Amounts provided by section
101 shall not be made available to transport
aliens unlawfully present in, paroled into, or
inadmissible to the United States into the
interior of the United States for purposes
other than enforcement of the immigration
laws (as such term is defined in section 101 of
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8
U.S.C. 1101)).
(b) The limitation under subsection (a)
shall not apply with respect to amounts
made available to transport unaccompanied
alien children (as such term is defined in sec-
tion 462 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002
(6 U.S.C. 279)).
S
EC
. 128. Amounts provided by section 101
shall not be made available to issue any em-
ployment authorization document or similar
document to any alien whose application for
asylum in the United States has been denied,
or who is convicted of a Federal or State
crime while his or her application for asylum
in the United States is pending.
S
EC
. 129. Amounts provided by section 101
shall not be made available to obligate, ex-
pend, or transfer to another Federal agency,
board, or commission to be used to dis-
mantle, demolish, remove, or damage exist-
ing United States-Mexico physical barriers
at any location where such barriers have
been constructed as of the date of enactment
of this Act unless such barrier is simulta-
neously being repaired or replaced.
S
EC
. 130. Amounts provided by section 101
shall not be made available to implement,
administer, or otherwise carry out the ac-
tivities and policies described in the memo-
randum issued by the Secretary of Homeland
Security on September 30, 2021, entitled
‘‘Guidelines for the Enforcement of Civil Im-
migration Law’’ or described in the memo-
randum issued by Kerry Doyle, Immigration
and Customs Enforcement Principal Legal
Advisor on April 3, 2022, entitled ‘‘Guidance
to OPLA Attorneys Regarding the Enforce-
ment of Civil Immigration Laws and the Ex-
ercise of 20 Prosecutorial Discretion’’ or any
successor or similar memorandum or policy.
S
EC
. 131. Amounts provided by section 101
shall not be made available to implement,
administer, or otherwise carry out the poli-
cies described in the directive issued by the
Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and
Border Protection on January 10, 2023, enti-
tled ‘‘Emergency Driving and Vehicular Pur-
suits’’.
S
EC
. 132. Amounts provided by section 101
shall not be made available to implement,
administer, or enforce the rule entitled
‘‘Procedures or Credible Fear Screening and
Consideration of Asylum, Withholding of Re-
moval, and CAT Protection Claims by Asy-
lum Officers’’ (87 Fed. Reg. 18078).
S
EC
. 133. Amounts provided by section 101
shall not be made available to release (in-
cluding pursuant to parole or release pursu-
ant to section 236(a) of the Immigration and
Nationality Act but excluding as expressly
authorized pursuant to section 212(d)(5)) an
alien described in section 235(b)(1)(A)(i)–(ii),
(b)(1)(B), or (b)(2), other than to be removed,
including to a country described in section
208(a)(2)(A), or returned to a country as de-
scribed in section 235(b)(3).
S
EC
. 134. Amounts provided by section 101
shall not be made available to implement,
administer, or enforce the rule related to
‘‘Circumvention of Lawful Pathways’’ (88
Fed. Reg. 11704).
S
EC
. 135. (a) Sections 1309(a) and 1319 of the
National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42
U.S.C. 4016(a) and 4026) shall be applied by
substituting the date specified in section
106(3) of this Act for ‘‘September 30, 2023’’.
(b)(1) Subject to paragraph (2), this section
shall become effective immediately upon en-
actment of this Act.
(2) If this Act is enacted after September
30, 2023, this section shall be applied as if it
were in effect on September 30, 2023.
S
EC
. 136. (a) Of the amounts made available
pursuant to section 40803(c)(2) of Public Law
117–58, the Secretary of Agriculture shall
transfer to the Secretary of the Interior such
sums as are necessary to continue without
interruption the Federal wildland firefighter
base salary increase provided under Section
40803(d)(4)(B) of such Public Law.
(b) In carrying out subsection (a), the Sec-
retary of Agriculture—
(1) may make more than one transfer of
funds under this section; and
(2) may not transfer a total amount of
funds greater than $17,250,000.
(c) No funds transferred pursuant to this
section may be obligated without prior writ-
ten notification, to the Committees on Ap-
propriations of the House of Representatives
and the Senate, of the date of the transfer,
the total amount to be transferred, and the
remaining funds available for transfer.
S
EC
. 137. Notwithstanding section 101, sec-
tion 126 of Division J of Public Law 117–328
shall be applied during the period covered by
this Act by substituting ‘‘fiscal year 2017, fis-
cal year 2018, and fiscal year 2019’’ for ‘‘fiscal
year 2017 and fiscal year 2018’’.
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Con-
tinuing Appropriations Act, 2024’’.
DIVISION B—OTHER MATTERS
SEC. 101. STATUTORY PAYGO SCORECARDS.
The budgetary effects of this division and
each succeeding division shall not be entered
on either PAYGO scorecard maintained pur-
suant to section 4(d) of the Statutory Pay-
As-You-Go Act of 2010.
SEC. 102. SENATE PAYGO SCORECARDS.
The budgetary effects of this division and
each succeeding division shall not be entered
on any PAYGO scorecard maintained for
purposes of section 4106 of H. Con. Res. 71
(115th Congress).
SEC. 103. CLASSIFICATION OF BUDGETARY EF-
FECTS.
Notwithstanding Rule 3 of the Budget
Scorekeeping Guidelines set forth in the
joint explanatory statement of the com-
mittee of conference accompanying Con-
ference Report 105–217 and section 250(c)(8) of
the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit
Control Act of 1985, the budgetary effects of
this division and each succeeding division
shall not be estimated—
(1) for purposes of section 251 of such Act;
(2) for purposes of an allocation to the
Committee on Appropriations pursuant to
section 302(a) of the Congressional Budget
Act of 1974; and
(3) for purposes of paragraph (4)(C) of sec-
tion 3 of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act
of 2010 as being included in an appropriation
Act.
DIVISION C—BORDER SECURITY
SEC. 101. DEFINITIONS.
In this division:
(1) CBP.—The term ‘‘CBP’’ means U.S. Cus-
toms and Border Protection.
(2) C
OMMISSIONER
.—The term ‘‘Commis-
sioner’’ means the Commissioner of U.S. Cus-
toms and Border Protection.
(3) D
EPARTMENT
.—The term ‘‘Department’’
means the Department of Homeland Secu-
rity.
(4) O
PERATIONAL CONTROL
.—The term
‘‘operational control’’ has the meaning given
such term in section 2(b) of the Secure Fence
Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–367; 8 U.S.C. 1701
note).
(5) S
ECRETARY
.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’
means the Secretary of Homeland Security.
(6) S
ITUATIONAL AWARENESS
.—The term
‘‘situational awareness’’ has the meaning
given such term in section 1092(a)(7) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 6 U.S.C.
223(a)(7)).
(7) U
NMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM
.—The term
‘‘unmanned aircraft system’’ has the mean-
ing given such term in section 44801 of title
49, United States Code.
SEC. 102. BORDER WALL CONSTRUCTION.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—
(1) I
MMEDIATE RESUMPTION OF BORDER WALL
CONSTRUCTION
.—Not later than seven days
after the date of the enactment of this Act,
the Secretary shall resume all activities re-
lated to the construction of the border wall
along the border between the United States
and Mexico that were underway or being
planned for prior to January 20, 2021.
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.015 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSE H4873 September 29, 2023
(2) U
SE OF FUNDS
.—To carry out this sec-
tion, the Secretary shall expend all unex-
pired funds appropriated or explicitly obli-
gated for the construction of the border wall
that were appropriated or obligated, as the
case may be, for use beginning on October 1,
2019.
(3) U
SE OF MATERIALS
.—Any unused mate-
rials purchased before the date of the enact-
ment of this Act for construction of the bor-
der wall may be used for activities related to
the construction of the border wall in ac-
cordance with paragraph (1).
(b) P
LAN
T
O
C
OMPLETE
T
ACTICAL
I
NFRA
-
STRUCTURE AND
T
ECHNOLOGY
.—Not later than
90 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act and annually thereafter until con-
struction of the border wall has been com-
pleted, the Secretary shall submit to the ap-
propriate congressional committees an im-
plementation plan, including annual bench-
marks for the construction of 200 miles of
such wall and associated cost estimates for
satisfying all requirements of the construc-
tion of the border wall, including installa-
tion and deployment of tactical infrastruc-
ture, technology, and other elements as iden-
tified by the Department prior to January
20, 2021, through the expenditure of funds ap-
propriated or explicitly obligated, as the
case may be, for use, as well as any future
funds appropriated or otherwise made avail-
able by Congress.
(c) D
EFINITIONS
.—In this section:
(1) A
PPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMIT
-
TEES
.—The term ‘‘appropriate congressional
committees’’ means the Committee on
Homeland Security and the Committee on
Appropriations of the House of Representa-
tives and the Committee on Homeland Secu-
rity and Governmental Affairs and the Com-
mittee on Appropriations of the Senate.
(2) T
ACTICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
.—The term
‘‘tactical infrastructure’’ includes boat
ramps, access gates, checkpoints, lighting,
and roads associated with a border wall.
(3) T
ECHNOLOGY
.—The term ‘‘technology’’
includes border surveillance and detection
technology, including linear ground detec-
tion systems, associated with a border wall.
SEC. 103. STRENGTHENING THE REQUIREMENTS
FOR BARRIERS ALONG THE SOUTH-
ERN BORDER.
Section 102 of the Illegal Immigration Re-
form and Immigrant Responsibility Act of
1996 (Division C of Public Law 104–208; 8
U.S.C. 1103 note) is amended—
(1) by amending subsection (a) to read as
follows:
‘‘(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—The Secretary of Home-
land Security shall take such actions as may
be necessary (including the removal of obsta-
cles to detection of illegal entrants) to de-
sign, test, construct, install, deploy, inte-
grate, and operate physical barriers, tactical
infrastructure, and technology in the vicin-
ity of the southwest border to achieve situa-
tional awareness and operational control of
the southwest border and deter, impede, and
detect unlawful activity.’’;
(2) in subsection (b)—
(A) in the subsection heading, by striking
‘‘F
ENCING AND
R
OAD
I
MPROVEMENTS
’’ and in-
serting ‘‘P
HYSICAL
B
ARRIERS
’’;
(B) in paragraph (1)—
(i) in the heading, by striking ‘‘
FENCING
’’
and inserting ‘‘
BARRIERS
’’;
(ii) by amending subparagraph (A) to read
as follows:
‘‘(A) R
EINFORCED BARRIERS
.—In carrying
out this section, the Secretary of Homeland
Security shall construct a border wall, in-
cluding physical barriers, tactical infra-
structure, and technology, along not fewer
than 900 miles of the southwest border until
situational awareness and operational con-
trol of the southwest border is achieved.’’;
(iii) by amending subparagraph (B) to read
as follows:
‘‘(B) P
HYSICAL BARRIERS AND TACTICAL IN
-
FRASTRUCTURE
.—In carrying out this section,
the Secretary of Homeland Security shall de-
ploy along the southwest border the most
practical and effective physical barriers, tac-
tical infrastructure, and technology avail-
able for achieving situational awareness and
operational control of the southwest bor-
der.’’;
(iv) in subparagraph (C)—
(I) by amending clause (i) to read as fol-
lows:
‘‘(i) I
N GENERAL
.—In carrying out this sec-
tion, the Secretary of Homeland Security
shall consult with the Secretary of the Inte-
rior, the Secretary of Agriculture, appro-
priate representatives of State, Tribal, and
local governments, and appropriate private
property owners in the United States to min-
imize the impact on natural resources, com-
merce, and sites of historical or cultural sig-
nificance for the communities and residents
located near the sites at which physical bar-
riers, tactical infrastructure, and technology
are to be constructed. Such consultation
may not delay such construction for longer
than seven days.’’; and
(II) in clause (ii)—
(aa) in subclause (I), by striking ‘‘or’’ after
the semicolon at the end;
(bb) by amending subclause (II) to read as
follows:
‘‘(II) delay the transfer to the United
States of the possession of property or affect
the validity of any property acquisition by
the United States by purchase or eminent
domain, or to otherwise affect the eminent
domain laws of the United States or of any
State; or’’; and
(cc) by adding at the end the following new
subclause:
‘‘(III) create any right or liability for any
party.’’; and
(v) by striking subparagraph (D);
(C) in paragraph (2)—
(i) by striking ‘‘Attorney General’’ and in-
serting ‘‘Secretary of Homeland Security’’;
(ii) by striking ‘‘this subsection’’ and in-
serting ‘‘this section’’; and
(iii) by striking ‘‘construction of fences’’
and inserting ‘‘the construction of physical
barriers, tactical infrastructure, and tech-
nology’’;
(D) by amending paragraph (3) to read as
follows:
‘‘(3) A
GENT SAFETY
.—In carrying out this
section, the Secretary of Homeland Security,
when designing, testing, constructing, in-
stalling, deploying, integrating, and oper-
ating physical barriers, tactical infrastruc-
ture, or technology, shall incorporate such
safety features into such design, test, con-
struction, installation, deployment, integra-
tion, or operation of such physical barriers,
tactical infrastructure, or technology, as the
case may be, that the Secretary determines
are necessary to maximize the safety and ef-
fectiveness of officers and agents of the De-
partment of Homeland Security or of any
other Federal agency deployed in the vicin-
ity of such physical barriers, tactical infra-
structure, or technology.’’; and
(E) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘this sub-
section’’ and inserting ‘‘this section’’;
(3) in subsection (c)—
(A) by amending paragraph (1) to read as
follows:
‘‘(1) I
N GENERAL
.—Notwithstanding any
other provision of law, the Secretary of
Homeland Security shall waive all legal re-
quirements necessary to ensure the expedi-
tious design, testing, construction, installa-
tion, deployment, integration, operation,
and maintenance of the physical barriers,
tactical infrastructure, and technology
under this section. The Secretary shall en-
sure the maintenance and effectiveness of
such physical barriers, tactical infrastruc-
ture, or technology. Any such action by the
Secretary shall be effective upon publication
in the Federal Register.’’;
(B) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para-
graph (3); and
(C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the fol-
lowing new paragraph:
‘‘(2) N
OTIFICATION
.—Not later than seven
days after the date on which the Secretary of
Homeland Security exercises a waiver pursu-
ant to paragraph (1), the Secretary shall no-
tify the Committee on Homeland Security of
the House of Representatives and the Com-
mittee on Homeland Security and Govern-
mental Affairs of the Senate of such waiv-
er.’’; and
(4) by adding at the end the following new
subsections:
‘‘(e) T
ECHNOLOGY
.—In carrying out this
section, the Secretary of Homeland Security
shall deploy along the southwest border the
most practical and effective technology
available for achieving situational awareness
and operational control.
‘‘(f) D
EFINITIONS
.—In this section:
‘‘(1) A
DVANCED UNATTENDED SURVEILLANCE
SENSORS
.—The term ‘advanced unattended
surveillance sensors’ means sensors that uti-
lize an onboard computer to analyze detec-
tions in an effort to discern between vehi-
cles, humans, and animals, and ultimately
filter false positives prior to transmission.
‘‘(2) O
PERATIONAL CONTROL
.—The term
‘operational control’ has the meaning given
such term in section 2(b) of the Secure Fence
Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–367; 8 U.S.C. 1701
note).
‘‘(3) P
HYSICAL BARRIERS
.—The term ‘phys-
ical barriers’ includes reinforced fencing, the
border wall, and levee walls.
‘‘(4) S
ITUATIONAL AWARENESS
.—The term
‘situational awareness’ has the meaning
given such term in section 1092(a)(7) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 6 U.S.C.
223(a)(7)).
‘‘(5) T
ACTICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
.—The term
‘tactical infrastructure’ includes boat ramps,
access gates, checkpoints, lighting, and
roads.
‘‘(6) T
ECHNOLOGY
.—The term ‘technology’
includes border surveillance and detection
technology, including the following:
‘‘(A) Tower-based surveillance technology.
‘‘(B) Deployable, lighter-than-air ground
surveillance equipment.
‘‘(C) Vehicle and Dismount Exploitation
Radars (VADER).
‘‘(D) 3-dimensional, seismic acoustic detec-
tion and ranging border tunneling detection
technology.
‘‘(E) Advanced unattended surveillance
sensors.
‘‘(F) Mobile vehicle-mounted and man-
portable surveillance capabilities.
‘‘(G) Unmanned aircraft systems.
‘‘(H) Tunnel detection systems and other
seismic technology.
‘‘(I) Fiber-optic cable.
‘‘(J) Other border detection, communica-
tion, and surveillance technology.
‘‘(7) U
NMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM
.—The
term ‘unmanned aircraft system’ has the
meaning given such term in section 44801 of
title 49, United States Code.’’.
SEC. 104. BORDER AND PORT SECURITY TECH-
NOLOGY INVESTMENT PLAN.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—Not later than 180 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act,
the Commissioner, in consultation with cov-
ered officials and border and port security
technology stakeholders, shall submit to the
appropriate congressional committees a
strategic 5-year technology investment plan
(in this section referred to as the ‘‘plan’’).
The plan may include a classified annex, if
appropriate.
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.015 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSEH4874 September 29, 2023
(b) C
ONTENTS OF
P
LAN
.—The plan shall in-
clude the following:
(1) An analysis of security risks at and be-
tween ports of entry along the northern and
southern borders of the United States.
(2) An identification of capability gaps
with respect to security at and between such
ports of entry to be mitigated in order to—
(A) prevent terrorists and instruments of
terror from entering the United States;
(B) combat and reduce cross-border crimi-
nal activity, including—
(i) the transport of illegal goods, such as il-
licit drugs; and
(ii) human smuggling and human traf-
ficking; and
(C) facilitate the flow of legal trade across
the southwest border.
(3) An analysis of current and forecast
trends relating to the number of aliens
who—
(A) unlawfully entered the United States
by crossing the northern or southern border
of the United States; or
(B) are unlawfully present in the United
States.
(4) A description of security-related tech-
nology acquisitions, to be listed in order of
priority, to address the security risks and
capability gaps analyzed and identified pur-
suant to paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively.
(5) A description of each planned security-
related technology program, including objec-
tives, goals, and timelines for each such pro-
gram.
(6) An identification of each deployed secu-
rity-related technology that is at or near the
end of the life cycle of such technology.
(7) A description of the test, evaluation,
modeling, and simulation capabilities, in-
cluding target methodologies, rationales,
and timelines, necessary to support the ac-
quisition of security-related technologies
pursuant to paragraph (4).
(8) An identification and assessment of
ways to increase opportunities for commu-
nication and collaboration with the private
sector, small and disadvantaged businesses,
intragovernment entities, university centers
of excellence, and federal laboratories to en-
sure CBP is able to engage with the market
for security-related technologies that are
available to satisfy its mission needs before
engaging in an acquisition of a security-re-
lated technology.
(9) An assessment of the management of
planned security-related technology pro-
grams by the acquisition workforce of CBP.
(10) An identification of ways to leverage
already-existing acquisition expertise within
the Federal Government.
(11) A description of the security resources,
including information security resources, re-
quired to protect security-related tech-
nology from physical or cyber theft, diver-
sion, sabotage, or attack.
(12) A description of initiatives to—
(A) streamline the acquisition process of
CBP; and
(B) provide to the private sector greater
predictability and transparency with respect
to such process, including information relat-
ing to the timeline for testing and evalua-
tion of security-related technology.
(13) An assessment of the privacy and secu-
rity impact on border communities of secu-
rity-related technology.
(14) In the case of a new acquisition leading
to the removal of equipment from a port of
entry along the northern or southern border
of the United States, a strategy to consult
with the private sector and community
stakeholders affected by such removal.
(15) A strategy to consult with the private
sector and community stakeholders with re-
spect to security impacts at a port of entry
described in paragraph (14).
(16) An identification of recent techno-
logical advancements in the following:
(A) Manned aircraft sensor, communica-
tion, and common operating picture tech-
nology.
(B) Unmanned aerial systems and related
technology, including counter-unmanned
aerial system technology.
(C) Surveillance technology, including the
following:
(i) Mobile surveillance vehicles.
(ii) Associated electronics, including cam-
eras, sensor technology, and radar.
(iii) Tower-based surveillance technology.
(iv) Advanced unattended surveillance sen-
sors.
(v) Deployable, lighter-than-air, ground
surveillance equipment.
(D) Nonintrusive inspection technology, in-
cluding non-x-ray devices utilizing muon to-
mography and other advanced detection
technology.
(E) Tunnel detection technology.
(F) Communications equipment, including
the following:
(i) Radios.
(ii) Long-term evolution broadband.
(iii) Miniature satellites.
(c) L
EVERAGING THE
P
RIVATE
S
ECTOR
.—To
the extent practicable, the plan shall—
(1) leverage emerging technological capa-
bilities, and research and development
trends, within the public and private sectors;
(2) incorporate input from the private sec-
tor, including from border and port security
stakeholders, through requests for informa-
tion, industry day events, and other innova-
tive means consistent with the Federal Ac-
quisition Regulation; and
(3) identify security-related technologies
that are in development or deployed, with or
without adaptation, that may satisfy the
mission needs of CBP.
(d) F
ORM
.—To the extent practicable, the
plan shall be published in unclassified form
on the website of the Department.
(e) D
ISCLOSURE
.—The plan shall include an
identification of individuals not employed by
the Federal Government, and their profes-
sional affiliations, who contributed to the
development of the plan.
(f) U
PDATE AND
R
EPORT
.—Not later than
the date that is two years after the date on
which the plan is submitted to the appro-
priate congressional committees pursuant to
subsection (a) and biennially thereafter for
ten years, the Commissioner shall submit to
the appropriate congressional committees—
(1) an update of the plan, if appropriate;
and
(2) a report that includes—
(A) the extent to which each security-re-
lated technology acquired by CBP since the
initial submission of the plan or most recent
update of the plan, as the case may be, is
consistent with the planned technology pro-
grams and projects described pursuant to
subsection (b)(5); and
(B) the type of contract and the reason for
acquiring each such security-related tech-
nology.
(g) D
EFINITIONS
.—In this section:
(1) A
PPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMIT
-
TEES
.—The term ‘‘appropriate congressional
committees’’ means—
(A) the Committee on Homeland Security
and the Committee on Appropriations of the
House of Representatives; and
(B) the Committee on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs and the Com-
mittee on Appropriations of the Senate.
(2) C
OVERED OFFICIALS
.—The term ‘‘covered
officials’’ means—
(A) the Under Secretary for Management
of the Department;
(B) the Under Secretary for Science and
Technology of the Department; and
(C) the Chief Information Officer of the De-
partment.
(3) U
NLAWFULLY PRESENT
.—The term ‘‘un-
lawfully present’’ has the meaning provided
such term in section 212(a)(9)(B)(ii) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.
1182(a)(9)(B)(ii)).
SEC. 105. BORDER SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PRO-
GRAM MANAGEMENT.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—Subtitle C of title IV of
the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C.
231 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end
the following new section:
‘‘SEC. 437. BORDER SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PRO-
GRAM MANAGEMENT.
‘‘(a) M
AJOR
A
CQUISITION
P
ROGRAM
D
E
-
FINED
.—In this section, the term ‘major ac-
quisition program’ means an acquisition pro-
gram of the Department that is estimated by
the Secretary to require an eventual total
expenditure of at least $100,000,000 (based on
fiscal year 2023 constant dollars) over its life-
cycle cost.
‘‘(b) P
LANNING
D
OCUMENTATION
.—For each
border security technology acquisition pro-
gram of the Department that is determined
to be a major acquisition program, the Sec-
retary shall—
‘‘(1) ensure that each such program has a
written acquisition program baseline ap-
proved by the relevant acquisition decision
authority;
‘‘(2) document that each such program is
satisfying cost, schedule, and performance
thresholds as specified in such baseline, in
compliance with relevant departmental ac-
quisition policies and the Federal Acquisi-
tion Regulation; and
‘‘(3) have a plan for satisfying program im-
plementation objectives by managing con-
tractor performance.
‘‘(c) A
DHERENCE TO
S
TANDARDS
.—The Sec-
retary, acting through the Under Secretary
for Management and the Commissioner of
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, shall
ensure border security technology acquisi-
tion program managers who are responsible
for carrying out this section adhere to rel-
evant internal control standards identified
by the Comptroller General of the United
States. The Commissioner shall provide in-
formation, as needed, to assist the Under
Secretary in monitoring management of bor-
der security technology acquisition pro-
grams under this section.
‘‘(d) P
LAN
.—The Secretary, acting through
the Under Secretary for Management, in co-
ordination with the Under Secretary for
Science and Technology and the Commis-
sioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protec-
tion, shall submit to the Committee on
Homeland Security of the House of Rep-
resentatives and the Committee on Home-
land Security and Governmental Affairs of
the Senate a plan for testing, evaluating,
and using independent verification and vali-
dation of resources relating to the proposed
acquisition of border security technology.
Under such plan, the proposed acquisition of
new border security technologies shall be
evaluated through a series of assessments,
processes, and audits to ensure—
‘‘(1) compliance with relevant depart-
mental acquisition policies and the Federal
Acquisition Regulation; and
‘‘(2) the effective use of taxpayer dollars.’’.
(b) C
LERICAL
A
MENDMENT
.—The table of
contents in section 1(b) of the Homeland Se-
curity Act of 2002 is amended by inserting
after the item relating to section 436 the fol-
lowing new item:
‘‘Sec. 437. Border security technology pro-
gram management.’’.
(c) P
ROHIBITION ON
A
DDITIONAL
A
UTHORIZA
-
TION OF
A
PPROPRIATIONS
.—No additional
funds are authorized to be appropriated to
carry out section 437 of the Homeland Secu-
rity Act of 2002, as added by subsection (a).
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.015 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSE H4875 September 29, 2023
SEC. 106. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTEC-
TION TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES.
(a) S
ECURE
C
OMMUNICATIONS
.—The Com-
missioner shall ensure that each CBP officer
or agent, as appropriate, is equipped with a
secure radio or other two-way communica-
tion device that allows each such officer or
agent to communicate—
(1) between ports of entry and inspection
stations; and
(2) with other Federal, State, Tribal, and
local law enforcement entities.
(b) B
ORDER
S
ECURITY
D
EPLOYMENT
P
RO
-
GRAM
.—
(1) E
XPANSION
.—Not later than September
30, 2025, the Commissioner shall—
(A) fully implement the Border Security
Deployment Program of CBP; and
(B) expand the integrated surveillance and
intrusion detection system at land ports of
entry along the northern and southern bor-
ders of the United States.
(2) A
UTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS
.—In
addition to amounts otherwise authorized to
be appropriated for such purpose, there is au-
thorized to be appropriated $33,000,000 for fis-
cal years 2024 and 2025 to carry out para-
graph (1).
(c) U
PGRADE OF
L
ICENSE
P
LATE
R
EADERS AT
P
ORTS OF
E
NTRY
.—
(1) U
PGRADE
.—Not later than two years
after the date of the enactment of this Act,
the Commissioner shall upgrade all existing
license plate readers in need of upgrade, as
determined by the Commissioner, on the
northern and southern borders of the United
States.
(2) A
UTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS
.—In
addition to amounts otherwise authorized to
be appropriated for such purpose, there is au-
thorized to be appropriated $125,000,000 for
fiscal years 2023 and 2024 to carry out para-
graph (1).
SEC. 107. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTEC-
TION PERSONNEL.
(a) R
ETENTION
B
ONUS
.—To carry out this
section, there is authorized to be appro-
priated up to $100,000,000 to the Commis-
sioner to provide a retention bonus to any
front-line U.S. Border Patrol law enforce-
ment agent—
(1) whose position is equal to or below level
GS–12 of the General Schedule;
(2) who has five years or more of service
with the U.S. Border Patrol; and
(3) who commits to two years of additional
service with the U.S. Border Patrol upon ac-
ceptance of such bonus.
(b) B
ORDER
P
ATROL
A
GENTS
.—Not later
than September 30, 2025, the Commissioner
shall hire, train, and assign a sufficient num-
ber of Border Patrol agents to maintain an
active duty presence of not fewer than 22,000
full-time equivalent Border Patrol agents,
who may not perform the duties of proc-
essing coordinators.
(c) P
ROHIBITION
A
GAINST
A
LIEN
T
RAVEL
.—
No personnel or equipment of Air and Marine
Operations may be used for the transpor-
tation of non-detained aliens, or detained
aliens expected to be administratively re-
leased upon arrival, from the southwest bor-
der to destinations within the United States.
(d) GAO R
EPORT
.—If the staffing level re-
quired under this section is not achieved by
the date associated with such level, the
Comptroller General of the United States
shall—
(1) conduct a review of the reasons why
such level was not so achieved; and
(2) not later than September 30, 2027, pub-
lish on a publicly available website of the
Government Accountability Office a report
relating thereto.
SEC. 108. ANTI-BORDER CORRUPTION ACT REAU-
THORIZATION.
(a) H
IRING
F
LEXIBILITY
.—Section 3 of the
Anti-Border Corruption Act of 2010 (6 U.S.C.
221; Public Law 111–376) is amended by strik-
ing subsection (b) and inserting the following
new subsections:
‘‘(b) W
AIVER
R
EQUIREMENT
.—Subject to
subsection (c), the Commissioner of U.S. Cus-
toms and Border Protection shall waive the
application of subsection (a)(1)—
‘‘(1) to a current, full-time law enforce-
ment officer employed by a State or local
law enforcement agency who—
‘‘(A) has continuously served as a law en-
forcement officer for not fewer than three
years;
‘‘(B) is authorized by law to engage in or
supervise the prevention, detection, inves-
tigation, or prosecution of, or the incarcer-
ation of any person for, any violation of law,
and has statutory powers for arrest or appre-
hension; and
‘‘(C) is not currently under investigation,
has not been found to have engaged in crimi-
nal activity or serious misconduct, has not
resigned from a law enforcement officer posi-
tion under investigation or in lieu of termi-
nation, and has not been dismissed from a
law enforcement officer position;
‘‘(2) to a current, full-time Federal law en-
forcement officer who—
‘‘(A) has continuously served as a law en-
forcement officer for not fewer than three
years;
‘‘(B) is authorized to make arrests, conduct
investigations, conduct searches, make sei-
zures, carry firearms, and serve orders, war-
rants, and other processes;
‘‘(C) is not currently under investigation,
has not been found to have engaged in crimi-
nal activity or serious misconduct, has not
resigned from a law enforcement officer posi-
tion under investigation or in lieu of termi-
nation, and has not been dismissed from a
law enforcement officer position; and
‘‘(D) holds a current Tier 4 background in-
vestigation or current Tier 5 background in-
vestigation; or
‘‘(3) to a member of the Armed Forces (or
a reserve component thereof) or a veteran, if
such individual—
‘‘(A) has served in the Armed Forces for
not fewer than three years;
‘‘(B) holds, or has held within the past five
years, a Secret, Top Secret, or Top Secret/
Sensitive Compartmented Information clear-
ance;
‘‘(C) holds, or has undergone within the
past five years, a current Tier 4 background
investigation or current Tier 5 background
investigation;
‘‘(D) received, or is eligible to receive, an
honorable discharge from service in the
Armed Forces and has not engaged in crimi-
nal activity or committed a serious military
or civil offense under the Uniform Code of
Military Justice; and
‘‘(E) was not granted any waivers to obtain
the clearance referred to in subparagraph
(B).
‘‘(c) T
ERMINATION OF
W
AIVER
R
EQUIREMENT
;
S
NAP
-B
ACK
.—The requirement to issue a
waiver under subsection (b) shall terminate
if the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) certifies to the
Committee on Homeland Security of the
House of Representatives and the Committee
on Homeland Security and Governmental Af-
fairs of the Senate that CBP has met all re-
quirements pursuant to section 107 of the Se-
cure the Border Act of 2023 relating to per-
sonnel levels. If at any time after such cer-
tification personnel levels fall below such re-
quirements, the Commissioner shall waive
the application of subsection (a)(1) until
such time as the Commissioner re-certifies
to such Committees that CBP has so met all
such requirements.’’.
(b) S
UPPLEMENTAL
C
OMMISSIONER
A
UTHOR
-
ITY
; R
EPORTING
; D
EFINITIONS
.—The Anti-Bor-
der Corruption Act of 2010 is amended by
adding at the end the following new sections:
‘‘SEC. 5. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMISSIONER AU-
THORITY.
‘‘(a) N
ONEXEMPTION
.—An individual who re-
ceives a waiver under section 3(b) is not ex-
empt from any other hiring requirements re-
lating to suitability for employment and eli-
gibility to hold a national security des-
ignated position, as determined by the Com-
missioner of U.S. Customs and Border Pro-
tection.
‘‘(b) B
ACKGROUND
I
NVESTIGATIONS
.—An in-
dividual who receives a waiver under section
3(b) who holds a current Tier 4 background
investigation shall be subject to a Tier 5
background investigation.
‘‘(c) A
DMINISTRATION OF
P
OLYGRAPH
E
XAM
-
INATION
.—The Commissioner of U.S. Customs
and Border Protection is authorized to ad-
minister a polygraph examination to an ap-
plicant or employee who is eligible for or re-
ceives a waiver under section 3(b) if informa-
tion is discovered before the completion of a
background investigation that results in a
determination that a polygraph examination
is necessary to make a final determination
regarding suitability for employment or con-
tinued employment, as the case may be.
‘‘SEC. 6. REPORTING.
‘‘(a) A
NNUAL
R
EPORT
.—Not later than one
year after the date of the enactment of this
section and annually thereafter while the
waiver authority under section 3(b) is in ef-
fect, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and
Border Protection shall submit to Congress a
report that includes, with respect to each
such reporting period, the following:
‘‘(1) Information relating to the number of
waivers granted under such section 3(b).
‘‘(2) Information relating to the percentage
of applicants who were hired after receiving
such a waiver.
‘‘(3) Information relating to the number of
instances that a polygraph was administered
to an applicant who initially received such a
waiver and the results of such polygraph.
‘‘(4) An assessment of the current impact
of such waiver authority on filling law en-
forcement positions at U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
‘‘(5) An identification of additional au-
thorities needed by U.S. Customs and Border
Protection to better utilize such waiver au-
thority for its intended goals.
‘‘(b) A
DDITIONAL
I
NFORMATION
.—The first
report submitted under subsection (a) shall
include the following:
‘‘(1) An analysis of other methods of em-
ployment suitability tests that detect decep-
tion and could be used in conjunction with
traditional background investigations to
evaluate potential applicants or employees
for suitability for employment or continued
employment, as the case may be.
‘‘(2) A recommendation regarding whether
a test referred to in paragraph (1) should be
adopted by U.S. Customs and Border Protec-
tion when the polygraph examination re-
quirement is waived pursuant to section 3(b).
‘‘SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.
‘‘In this Act:
‘‘(1) F
EDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
.—
The term ‘Federal law enforcement officer’
means a ‘law enforcement officer’, as such
term is defined in section 8331(20) or 8401(17)
of title 5, United States Code.
‘‘(2) S
ERIOUS MILITARY OR CIVIL OFFENSE
.—
The term ‘serious military or civil offense’
means an offense for which—
‘‘(A) a member of the Armed Forces may
be discharged or separated from service in
the Armed Forces; and
‘‘(B) a punitive discharge is, or would be,
authorized for the same or a closely related
offense under the Manual for Court-Martial,
as pursuant to Army Regulation 635–200,
chapter 14–12.
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.015 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSEH4876 September 29, 2023
‘‘(3) T
IER 4
;
TIER 5
.—The terms ‘Tier 4’ and
‘Tier 5’, with respect to background inves-
tigations, have the meaning given such
terms under the 2012 Federal Investigative
Standards.
‘‘(4) V
ETERAN
.—The term ‘veteran’ has the
meaning given such term in section 101(2) of
title 38, United States Code.’’.
(c) P
OLYGRAPH
E
XAMINERS
.—Not later than
September 30, 2025, the Secretary shall in-
crease to not fewer than 150 the number of
trained full-time equivalent polygraph exam-
iners for administering polygraphs under the
Anti-Border Corruption Act of 2010, as
amended by this section.
SEC. 109. ESTABLISHMENT OF WORKLOAD STAFF-
ING MODELS FOR U.S. BORDER PA-
TROL AND AIR AND MARINE OPER-
ATIONS OF CBP.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—Not later than one year
after the date of the enactment of this Act,
the Commissioner, in coordination with the
Under Secretary for Management, the Chief
Human Capital Officer, and the Chief Finan-
cial Officer of the Department, shall imple-
ment a workload staffing model for each of
the following:
(1) The U.S. Border Patrol.
(2) Air and Marine Operations of CBP.
(b) R
ESPONSIBILITIES OF THE
C
OMMIS
-
SIONER
.—Subsection (c) of section 411 of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 211),
is amended—
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (18) and
(19) as paragraphs (20) and (21), respectively;
and
(2) by inserting after paragraph (17) the fol-
lowing new paragraphs:
‘‘(18) implement a staffing model for the
U.S. Border Patrol, Air and Marine Oper-
ations, and the Office of Field Operations
that includes consideration for essential
frontline operator activities and functions,
variations in operating environments,
present and planned infrastructure, present
and planned technology, and required oper-
ations support levels to enable such entities
to manage and assign personnel of such enti-
ties to ensure field and support posts possess
adequate resources to carry out duties speci-
fied in this section;
‘‘(19) develop standard operating proce-
dures for a workforce tracking system with-
in the U.S. Border Patrol, Air and Marine
Operations, and the Office of Field Oper-
ations, train the workforce of each of such
entities on the use, capabilities, and purpose
of such system, and implement internal con-
trols to ensure timely and accurate sched-
uling and reporting of actual completed
work hours and activities;’’.
(c) R
EPORT
.—
(1) I
N GENERAL
.—Not later than one year
after the date of the enactment of this Act
with respect to subsection (a) and para-
graphs (18) and (19) of section 411(c) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002 (as amended
by subsection (b)), and annually thereafter
with respect to such paragraphs (18) and (19),
the Secretary shall submit to the appro-
priate congressional committees a report
that includes a status update on the fol-
lowing:
(A) The implementation of such subsection
(a) and such paragraphs (18) and (19).
(B) Each relevant workload staffing model.
(2) D
ATA SOURCES AND METHODOLOGY RE
-
QUIRED
.—Each report required under para-
graph (1) shall include information relating
to the data sources and methodology used to
generate each relevant staffing model.
(d) I
NSPECTOR
G
ENERAL
R
EVIEW
.—Not later
than 90 days after the Commissioner devel-
ops the workload staffing models pursuant to
subsection (a), the Inspector General of the
Department shall review such models and
provide feedback to the Secretary and the
appropriate congressional committees with
respect to the degree to which such models
are responsive to the recommendations of
the Inspector General, including the fol-
lowing:
(1) Recommendations from the Inspector
General’s February 2019 audit.
(2) Any further recommendations to im-
prove such models.
(e) A
PPROPRIATE
C
ONGRESSIONAL
C
OMMIT
-
TEES
D
EFINED
.—In this section, the term
‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’
means—
(1) the Committee on Homeland Security
of the House of Representatives; and
(2) the Committee on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs of the Senate.
SEC. 110. OPERATION STONEGARDEN.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—Subtitle A of title XX of
the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C.
601 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end
the following new section:
‘‘SEC. 2010. OPERATION STONEGARDEN.
‘‘(a) E
STABLISHMENT
.—There is established
in the Department a program to be known as
‘Operation Stonegarden’, under which the
Secretary, acting through the Adminis-
trator, shall make grants to eligible law en-
forcement agencies, through State adminis-
trative agencies, to enhance border security
in accordance with this section.
‘‘(b) E
LIGIBLE
R
ECIPIENTS
.—To be eligible
to receive a grant under this section, a law
enforcement agency shall—
‘‘(1) be located in—
‘‘(A) a State bordering Canada or Mexico;
or
‘‘(B) a State or territory with a maritime
border;
‘‘(2) be involved in an active, ongoing, U.S.
Customs and Border Protection operation co-
ordinated through a U.S. Border Patrol sec-
tor office; and
‘‘(3) have an agreement in place with U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement to
support enforcement operations.
‘‘(c) P
ERMITTED
U
SES
.—A recipient of a
grant under this section may use such grant
for costs associated with the following:
‘‘(1) Equipment, including maintenance
and sustainment.
‘‘(2) Personnel, including overtime and
backfill, in support of enhanced border law
enforcement activities.
‘‘(3) Any activity permitted for Operation
Stonegarden under the most recent fiscal
year Department of Homeland Security’s
Homeland Security Grant Program Notice of
Funding Opportunity.
‘‘(d) P
ERIOD OF
P
ERFORMANCE
.—The Sec-
retary shall award grants under this section
to grant recipients for a period of not fewer
than 36 months.
‘‘(e) N
OTIFICATION
.—Upon denial of a grant
to a law enforcement agency, the Adminis-
trator shall provide written notice to the
Committee on Homeland Security of the
House of Representatives and the Committee
on Homeland Security and Governmental Af-
fairs of the Senate, including the reasoning
for such denial.
‘‘(f) R
EPORT
.—For each of fiscal years 2024
through 2028 the Administrator shall submit
to the Committee on Homeland Security of
the House of Representatives and the Com-
mittee on Homeland Security and Govern-
mental Affairs of the Senate a report that
contains—
‘‘(1) information on the expenditure of
grants made under this section by each grant
recipient; and
‘‘(2) recommendations for other uses of
such grants to further support eligible law
enforcement agencies.
‘‘(g) A
UTHORIZATION OF
A
PPROPRIATIONS
.—
There is authorized to be appropriated
$110,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024
through 2028 for grants under this section.’’.
(b) C
ONFORMING
A
MENDMENT
.—Subsection
(a) of section 2002 of the Homeland Security
Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 603) is amended to read
as follows:
‘‘(a) G
RANTS
A
UTHORIZED
.—The Secretary,
through the Administrator, may award
grants under sections 2003, 2004, 2009, and 2010
to State, local, and Tribal governments, as
appropriate.’’.
(c) C
LERICAL
A
MENDMENT
.—The table of
contents in section 1(b) of the Homeland Se-
curity Act of 2002 is amended by inserting
after the item relating to section 2009 the
following new item:
‘‘Sec. 2010. Operation Stonegarden.’’.
SEC. 111. AIR AND MARINE OPERATIONS FLIGHT
HOURS.
(a) A
IR AND
M
ARINE
O
PERATIONS
F
LIGHT
H
OURS
.—Not later than 120 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec-
retary shall ensure that not fewer than
110,000 annual flight hours are carried out by
Air and Marine Operations of CBP.
(b) U
NMANNED
A
IRCRAFT
S
YSTEMS
.—The
Secretary, after coordination with the Ad-
ministrator of the Federal Aviation Admin-
istration, shall ensure that Air and Marine
Operations operate unmanned aircraft sys-
tems on the southern border of the United
States for not less than 24 hours per day.
(c) P
RIMARY
M
ISSIONS
.—The Commissioner
shall ensure the following:
(1) The primary missions for Air and Ma-
rine Operations are to directly support the
following:
(A) U.S. Border Patrol activities along the
borders of the United States.
(B) Joint Interagency Task Force South
and Joint Task Force East operations in the
transit zone.
(2) The Executive Assistant Commissioner
of Air and Marine Operations assigns the
greatest priority to support missions speci-
fied in paragraph (1).
(d) H
IGH
D
EMAND
F
LIGHT
H
OUR
R
EQUIRE
-
MENTS
.—The Commissioner shall—
(1) ensure that U.S. Border Patrol Sector
Chiefs identify air support mission-critical
hours; and
(2) direct Air and Marine Operations to
support requests from such Sector Chiefs as
a component of the primary mission of Air
and Marine Operations in accordance with
subsection (c)(1)(A).
(e) C
ONTRACT
A
IR
S
UPPORT
A
UTHORIZA
-
TIONS
.—The Commissioner shall contract for
air support mission-critical hours to meet
the requests for such hours, as identified
pursuant to subsection (d).
(f) S
MALL
U
NMANNED
A
IRCRAFT
S
YSTEMS
.—
(1) I
N GENERAL
.—The Chief of the U.S. Bor-
der Patrol shall be the executive agent with
respect to the use of small unmanned air-
craft by CBP for the purposes of the fol-
lowing:
(A) Meeting the unmet flight hour oper-
ational requirements of the U.S. Border Pa-
trol.
(B) Achieving situational awareness and
operational control of the borders of the
United States.
(2) C
OORDINATION
.—In carrying out para-
graph (1), the Chief of the U.S. Border Patrol
shall coordinate—
(A) flight operations with the Adminis-
trator of the Federal Aviation Administra-
tion to ensure the safe and efficient oper-
ation of the national airspace system; and
(B) with the Executive Assistant Commis-
sioner for Air and Marine Operations of CBP
to—
(i) ensure the safety of other CBP aircraft
flying in the vicinity of small unmanned air-
craft operated by the U.S. Border Patrol; and
(ii) establish a process to include data from
flight hours in the calculation of got away
statistics.
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.015 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSE H4877 September 29, 2023
(3) C
ONFORMING AMENDMENT
.—Paragraph
(3) of section 411(e) of the Homeland Security
Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 211(e)) is amended—
(A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’
after the semicolon at the end;
(B) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as
subparagraph (D); and
(C) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the
following new subparagraph:
‘‘(C) carry out the small unmanned aircraft
(as such term is defined in section 44801 of
title 49, United States Code) requirements
pursuant to subsection (f) of section 111 of
the Secure the Border Act of 2023; and’’.
(g) S
AVINGS
C
LAUSE
.—Nothing in this sec-
tion may be construed as conferring, trans-
ferring, or delegating to the Secretary, the
Commissioner, the Executive Assistant Com-
missioner for Air and Marine Operations of
CBP, or the Chief of the U.S. Border Patrol
any authority of the Secretary of Transpor-
tation or the Administrator of the Federal
Aviation Administration relating to the use
of airspace or aviation safety.
(h) D
EFINITIONS
.—In this section:
(1) G
OT AWAY
.—The term ‘‘got away’’ has
the meaning given such term in section
1092(a)(3) of the National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law
114–328; 6 U.S.C. 223(a)(3)).
(2) T
RANSIT ZONE
.—The term ‘‘transit
zone’’ has the meaning given such term in
section 1092(a)(8) of the National Defense Au-
thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public
Law 114–328; 6 U.S.C. 223(a)(8)).
SEC. 112. ERADICATION OF CARRIZO CANE AND
SALT CEDAR.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—Not later than 30 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act,
the Secretary, in coordination with the
heads of relevant Federal, State, and local
agencies, shall hire contractors to begin
eradicating the carrizo cane plant and any
salt cedar along the Rio Grande River that
impedes border security operations. Such
eradication shall be completed—
(1) by not later than September 30, 2027, ex-
cept for required maintenance; and
(2) in the most expeditious and cost-effec-
tive manner possible to maintain clear fields
of view.
(b) A
PPLICATION
.—The waiver authority
under subsection (c) of section 102 of the Ille-
gal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Re-
sponsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1103 note),
as amended by section 103 of this division,
shall apply to activities carried out pursuant
to subsection (a).
(c) R
EPORT
.—Not later than 180 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
Homeland Security of the House of Rep-
resentatives and the Committee on Home-
land Security and Governmental Affairs of
the Senate a strategic plan to eradicate all
carrizo cane plant and salt cedar along the
Rio Grande River that impedes border secu-
rity operations by not later than September
30, 2027.
(d) A
UTHORIZATION OF
A
PPROPRIATIONS
.—
There is authorized to be appropriated
$7,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through
2028 to the Secretary to carry out this sub-
section.
SEC. 113. BORDER PATROL STRATEGIC PLAN.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—Not later than one year
after the date of the enactment of this Act
and biennially thereafter, the Commissioner,
acting through the Chief of the U.S. Border
Patrol, shall issue a Border Patrol Strategic
Plan (referred to in this section as the
‘‘plan’’) to enhance the security of the bor-
ders of the United States.
(b) E
LEMENTS
.—The plan shall include the
following:
(1) A consideration of Border Patrol Capa-
bility Gap Analysis reporting, Border Secu-
rity Improvement Plans, and any other stra-
tegic document authored by the U.S. Border
Patrol to address security gaps between
ports of entry, including efforts to mitigate
threats identified in such analyses, plans,
and documents.
(2) Information relating to the dissemina-
tion of information relating to border secu-
rity or border threats with respect to the ef-
forts of the Department and other appro-
priate Federal agencies.
(3) Information relating to efforts by U.S.
Border Patrol to—
(A) increase situational awareness, includ-
ing—
(i) surveillance capabilities, such as capa-
bilities developed or utilized by the Depart-
ment of Defense, and any appropriate tech-
nology determined to be excess by the De-
partment of Defense; and
(ii) the use of manned aircraft and un-
manned aircraft;
(B) detect and prevent terrorists and in-
struments of terrorism from entering the
United States;
(C) detect, interdict, and disrupt between
ports of entry aliens unlawfully present in
the United States;
(D) detect, interdict, and disrupt human
smuggling, human trafficking, drug traf-
ficking, and other illicit cross-border activ-
ity;
(E) focus intelligence collection to disrupt
transnational criminal organizations outside
of the international and maritime borders of
the United States; and
(F) ensure that any new border security
technology can be operationally integrated
with existing technologies in use by the De-
partment.
(4) Information relating to initiatives of
the Department with respect to operational
coordination, including any relevant task
forces of the Department.
(5) Information gathered from the lessons
learned by the deployments of the National
Guard to the southern border of the United
States.
(6) A description of cooperative agreements
relating to information sharing with State,
local, Tribal, territorial, and other Federal
law enforcement agencies that have jurisdic-
tion on the borders of the United States.
(7) Information relating to border security
information received from the following:
(A) State, local, Tribal, territorial, and
other Federal law enforcement agencies that
have jurisdiction on the borders of the
United States or in the maritime environ-
ment.
(B) Border community stakeholders, in-
cluding representatives from the following:
(i) Border agricultural and ranching orga-
nizations.
(ii) Business and civic organizations.
(iii) Hospitals and rural clinics within 150
miles of the borders of the United States.
(iv) Victims of crime committed by aliens
unlawfully present in the United States.
(v) Victims impacted by drugs,
transnational criminal organizations, car-
tels, gangs, or other criminal activity.
(vi) Farmers, ranchers, and property own-
ers along the border.
(vii) Other individuals negatively impacted
by illegal immigration.
(8) Information relating to the staffing re-
quirements with respect to border security
for the Department.
(9) A prioritized list of Department re-
search and development objectives to en-
hance the security of the borders of the
United States.
(10) An assessment of training programs,
including such programs relating to the fol-
lowing:
(A) Identifying and detecting fraudulent
documents.
(B) Understanding the scope of CBP en-
forcement authorities and appropriate use of
force policies.
(C) Screening, identifying, and addressing
vulnerable populations, such as children and
victims of human trafficking.
SEC. 114. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTEC-
TION SPIRITUAL READINESS.
Not later than one year after the enact-
ment of this Act and annually thereafter for
five years, the Commissioner shall submit to
the Committee on Homeland Security of the
House of Representatives and the Committee
on Homeland Security and Governmental Af-
fairs of the Senate a report on the avail-
ability and usage of the assistance of chap-
lains, prayer groups, houses of worship, and
other spiritual resources for members of CBP
who identify as religiously affiliated and
have attempted suicide, have suicidal idea-
tion, or are at risk of suicide, and metrics on
the impact such resources have in assisting
religiously affiliated members who have ac-
cess to and utilize such resources compared
to religiously affiliated members who do not.
SEC. 115. RESTRICTIONS ON FUNDING.
(a) A
RRIVING
A
LIENS
.—No funds are author-
ized to be appropriated to the Department to
process the entry into the United States of
aliens arriving in between ports of entry.
(b) R
ESTRICTION ON
N
ONGOVERNMENTAL
O
R
-
GANIZATION
S
UPPORT FOR
U
NLAWFUL
A
CTIV
-
ITY
.—No funds are authorized to be appro-
priated to the Department for disbursement
to any nongovernmental organization that
facilitates or encourages unlawful activity,
including unlawful entry, human trafficking,
human smuggling, drug trafficking, and drug
smuggling.
(c) R
ESTRICTION ON
N
ONGOVERNMENTAL
O
R
-
GANIZATION
F
ACILITATION OF
I
LLEGAL
I
MMI
-
GRATION
.—No funds are authorized to be ap-
propriated to the Department for disburse-
ment to any nongovernmental organization
to provide, or facilitate the provision of,
transportation, lodging, or immigration
legal services to inadmissible aliens who
enter the United States after the date of the
enactment of this Act.
SEC. 116. COLLECTION OF DNA AND BIOMETRIC
INFORMATION AT THE BORDER.
Not later than 14 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall
ensure and certify to the Committee on
Homeland Security of the House of Rep-
resentatives and the Committee on Home-
land Security and Governmental Affairs of
the Senate that CBP is fully compliant with
Federal DNA and biometric collection re-
quirements at United States land borders.
SEC. 117. ERADICATION OF NARCOTIC DRUGS
AND FORMULATING EFFECTIVE NEW
TOOLS TO ADDRESS YEARLY LOSSES
OF LIFE; ENSURING TIMELY UP-
DATES TO U.S. CUSTOMS AND BOR-
DER PROTECTION FIELD MANUALS.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—Not later than 90 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act,
and not less frequently than triennially
thereafter, the Commissioner of U.S. Cus-
toms and Border Protection shall review and
update, as necessary, the current policies
and manuals of the Office of Field Oper-
ations related to inspections at ports of
entry, and the U.S. Border Patrol related to
inspections between ports of entry, to ensure
the uniform implementation of inspection
practices that will effectively respond to
technological and methodological changes
designed to disguise unlawful activity, such
as the smuggling of drugs and humans, along
the border.
(b) R
EPORTING
R
EQUIREMENT
.—Not later
than 90 days after each update required
under subsection (a), the Commissioner of
U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall
submit to the Committee on Homeland Secu-
rity and the Committee on the Judiciary of
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.015 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSEH4878 September 29, 2023
the House of Representatives and the Com-
mittee on Homeland Security and Govern-
mental Affairs and the Committee on the Ju-
diciary of the Senate a report that summa-
rizes any policy and manual changes pursu-
ant to subsection (a).
SEC. 118. PUBLICATION BY U.S. CUSTOMS AND
BORDER PROTECTION OF OPER-
ATIONAL STATISTICS.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—Not later than the sev-
enth day of each month beginning with the
second full month after the date of the en-
actment of this Act, the Commissioner of
U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall
publish on a publicly available website of the
Department of Homeland Security informa-
tion relating to the total number of alien en-
counters and nationalities, unique alien en-
counters and nationalities, gang affiliated
apprehensions and nationalities, drug sei-
zures, alien encounters included in the ter-
rorist screening database and nationalities,
arrests of criminal aliens or individuals
wanted by law enforcement and nationali-
ties, known got aways, encounters with de-
ceased aliens, and all other related or associ-
ated statistics recorded by U.S. Customs and
Border Protection during the immediately
preceding month. Each such publication
shall include the following:
(1) The aggregate such number, and such
number disaggregated by geographic regions,
of such recordings and encounters, including
specifications relating to whether such re-
cordings and encounters were at the south-
west, northern, or maritime border.
(2) An identification of the Office of Field
Operations field office, U.S. Border Patrol
sector, or Air and Marine Operations branch
making each recording or encounter.
(3) Information relating to whether each
recording or encounter of an alien was of a
single adult, an unaccompanied alien child,
or an individual in a family unit.
(4) Information relating to the processing
disposition of each alien recording or en-
counter.
(5) Information relating to the nationality
of each alien who is the subject of each re-
cording or encounter.
(6) The total number of individuals in-
cluded in the terrorist screening database (as
such term is defined in section 2101 of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 621))
who have repeatedly attempted to cross un-
lawfully into the United States.
(7) The total number of individuals in-
cluded in the terrorist screening database
who have been apprehended, including infor-
mation relating to whether such individuals
were released into the United States or re-
moved.
(b) E
XCEPTIONS
.—If the Commissioner of
U.S. Customs and Border Protection in any
month does not publish the information re-
quired under subsection (a), or does not pub-
lish such information by the date specified in
such subsection, the Commissioner shall
brief the Committee on Homeland Security
of the House of Representatives and the
Committee on Homeland Security and Gov-
ernmental Affairs of the Senate regarding
the reason relating thereto, as the case may
be, by not later than the date that is two
business days after the tenth day of such
month.
(c) D
EFINITIONS
.—In this section:
(1) A
LIEN ENCOUNTERS
.—The term ‘‘alien
encounters’’ means aliens apprehended, de-
termined inadmissible, or processed for re-
moval by U.S. Customs and Border Protec-
tion.
(2) G
OT AWAY
.—The term ‘‘got away’’ has
the meaning given such term in section
1092(a) of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (6 U.S.C. 223(a)).
(3) T
ERRORIST SCREENING DATABASE
.—The
term ‘‘terrorist screening database’’ has the
meaning given such term in section 2101 of
the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C.
621).
(4) U
NACCOMPANIED ALIEN CHILD
.—The term
‘‘unaccompanied alien child’’ has the mean-
ing given such term in section 462(g) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C.
279(g)).
SEC. 119. ALIEN CRIMINAL BACKGROUND
CHECKS.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—Not later than seven days
after the date of the enactment of this Act,
the Commissioner shall certify to the Com-
mittee on Homeland Security and the Com-
mittee on the Judiciary of the House of Rep-
resentatives and the Committee on Home-
land Security and Governmental Affairs and
the Committee on the Judiciary of the Sen-
ate that CBP has real-time access to the
criminal history databases of all countries of
origin and transit for aliens encountered by
CBP to perform criminal history background
checks for such aliens.
(b) S
TANDARDS
.—The certification required
under subsection (a) shall also include a de-
termination whether the criminal history
databases of a country are accurate, up to
date, digitized, searchable, and otherwise
meet the standards of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation for criminal history databases
maintained by State and local governments.
(c) C
ERTIFICATION
.—The Secretary shall an-
nually submit to the Committee on Home-
land Security and the Committee on the Ju-
diciary of the House of Representatives and
the Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs and the Committee on
the Judiciary of the Senate a certification
that each database referred to in subsection
(b) which the Secretary accessed or sought
to access pursuant to this section met the
standards described in subsection (b).
SEC. 120. PROHIBITED IDENTIFICATION DOCU-
MENTS AT AIRPORT SECURITY
CHECKPOINTS; NOTIFICATION TO
IMMIGRATION AGENCIES.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—The Administrator may
not accept as valid proof of identification a
prohibited identification document at an air-
port security checkpoint.
(b) N
OTIFICATION TO
I
MMIGRATION
A
GEN
-
CIES
.—If an individual presents a prohibited
identification document to an officer of the
Transportation Security Administration at
an airport security checkpoint, the Adminis-
trator shall promptly notify the Director of
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement,
the Director of U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, and the head of the appropriate
local law enforcement agency to determine
whether the individual is in violation of any
term of release from the custody of any such
agency.
(c) E
NTRY
I
NTO
S
TERILE
A
REAS
.—
(1) I
N GENERAL
.—Except as provided in
paragraph (2), if an individual is found to be
in violation of any term of release under sub-
section (b), the Administrator may not per-
mit such individual to enter a sterile area.
(2) E
XCEPTION
.—An individual presenting a
prohibited identification document under
this section may enter a sterile area if the
individual—
(A) is leaving the United States for the
purposes of removal or deportation; or
(B) presents a covered identification docu-
ment.
(d) C
OLLECTION OF
B
IOMETRIC
I
NFORMATION
F
ROM
C
ERTAIN
I
NDIVIDUALS
S
EEKING
E
NTRY
I
NTO THE
S
TERILE
A
REA OF AN
A
IRPORT
.—Be-
ginning not later than 120 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Adminis-
trator shall collect biometric information
from an individual described in subsection
(e) prior to authorizing such individual to
enter into a sterile area.
(e) I
NDIVIDUAL
D
ESCRIBED
.—An individual
described in this subsection is an individual
who—
(1) is seeking entry into the sterile area of
an airport;
(2) does not present a covered identifica-
tion document; and
(3) the Administrator cannot verify is a na-
tional of the United States.
(f) P
ARTICIPATION IN
IDENT.—Beginning
not later than 120 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Administrator, in
coordination with the Secretary, shall sub-
mit biometric data collected under this sec-
tion to the Automated Biometric Identifica-
tion System (IDENT).
(g) D
EFINITIONS
.—In this section:
(1) A
DMINISTRATOR
.—The term ‘‘Adminis-
trator’’ means the Administrator of the
Transportation Security Administration.
(2) B
IOMETRIC INFORMATION
.—The term ‘‘bi-
ometric information’’ means any of the fol-
lowing:
(A) A fingerprint.
(B) A palm print.
(C) A photograph, including—
(i) a photograph of an individual’s face for
use with facial recognition technology; and
(ii) a photograph of any physical or ana-
tomical feature, such as a scar, skin mark,
or tattoo.
(D) A signature.
(E) A voice print.
(F) An iris image.
(3) C
OVERED IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENT
.—
The term ‘‘covered identification document’’
means any of the following, if the document
is valid and unexpired:
(A) A United States passport or passport
card.
(B) A biometrically secure card issued by a
trusted traveler program of the Department
of Homeland Security, including—
(i) Global Entry;
(ii) Nexus;
(iii) Secure Electronic Network for Trav-
elers Rapid Inspection (SENTRI); and
(iv) Free and Secure Trade (FAST).
(C) An identification card issued by the De-
partment of Defense, including such a card
issued to a dependent.
(D) Any document required for admission
to the United States under section 211(a) of
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8
U.S.C. 1181(a)).
(E) An enhanced driver’s license issued by
a State.
(F) A photo identification card issued by a
federally recognized Indian Tribe.
(G) A personal identity verification creden-
tial issued in accordance with Homeland Se-
curity Presidential Directive 12.
(H) A driver’s license issued by a province
of Canada.
(I) A Secure Certificate of Indian Status
issued by the Government of Canada.
(J) A Transportation Worker Identification
Credential.
(K) A Merchant Mariner Credential issued
by the Coast Guard.
(L) A Veteran Health Identification Card
issued by the Department of Veterans Af-
fairs.
(M) Any other document the Adminis-
trator determines, pursuant to a rule mak-
ing in accordance with section 553 of title 5,
United States Code, will satisfy the identity
verification procedures of the Transpor-
tation Security Administration.
(4) I
MMIGRATION LAWS
.—The term ‘‘immi-
gration laws’’ has the meaning given that
term in section 101 of the Immigration and
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101).
(5) P
ROHIBITED IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENT
.—
The term ‘‘prohibited identification docu-
ment’’ means any of the following (or any
applicable successor form):
(A) U.S. Immigration and Customs En-
forcement Form I–200, Warrant for Arrest of
Alien.
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.015 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSE H4879 September 29, 2023
(B) U.S. Immigration and Customs En-
forcement Form I–205, Warrant of Removal/
Deportation.
(C) U.S. Immigration and Customs En-
forcement Form I–220A, Order of Release on
Recognizance.
(D) U.S. Immigration and Customs En-
forcement Form I–220B, Order of Super-
vision.
(E) Department of Homeland Security
Form I–862, Notice to Appear.
(F) U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Form I–94, Arrival/Departure Record (includ-
ing a print-out of an electronic record).
(G) Department of Homeland Security
Form I–385, Notice to Report.
(H) Any document that directs an indi-
vidual to report to the Department of Home-
land Security.
(I) Any Department of Homeland Security
work authorization or employment
verification document.
(6) S
TERILE AREA
.—The term ‘‘sterile area’’
has the meaning given that term in section
1540.5 of title 49, Code of Federal Regula-
tions, or any successor regulation.
SEC. 121. PROHIBITION AGAINST ANY COVID–19
VACCINE MANDATE OR ADVERSE AC-
TION AGAINST DHS EMPLOYEES.
(a) L
IMITATION ON
I
MPOSITION OF
N
EW
M
AN
-
DATE
.—The Secretary may not issue any
COVID–19 vaccine mandate unless Congress
expressly authorizes such a mandate.
(b) P
ROHIBITION ON
A
DVERSE
A
CTION
.—The
Secretary may not take any adverse action
against a Department employee based solely
on the refusal of such employee to receive a
vaccine for COVID–19.
(c) R
EPORT
.—Not later than 90 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Secretary shall report to the Committee on
Homeland Security of the House of Rep-
resentatives and the Committee on Home-
land Security and Governmental Affairs of
the Senate on the following:
(1) The number of Department employees
who were terminated or resigned due to the
COVID–19 vaccine mandate.
(2) An estimate of the cost to reinstate
such employees.
(3) How the Department would effectuate
reinstatement of such employees.
(d) R
ETENTION AND
D
EVELOPMENT OF
U
NVACCINATED
E
MPLOYEES
.—The Secretary
shall make every effort to retain Depart-
ment employees who are not vaccinated
against COVID–19 and provide such employ-
ees with professional development, pro-
motion and leadership opportunities, and
consideration equal to that of their peers.
SEC. 122. CBP ONE APP LIMITATION.
(a) L
IMITATION
.—The Department may use
the CBP One Mobile Application or any
other similar program, application, internet-
based portal, website, device, or initiative
only for inspection of perishable cargo.
(b) R
EPORT
.—Not later than 60 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Commissioner shall report to the Committee
on Homeland Security of the House of Rep-
resentatives and the Committee on Home-
land Security and Governmental Affairs of
the Senate the date on which CBP began
using CBP One to allow aliens to schedule
interviews at land ports of entry, how many
aliens have scheduled interviews at land
ports of entry using CBP One, the nationali-
ties of such aliens, and the stated final des-
tinations of such aliens within the United
States, if any.
SEC. 123. REPORT ON MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS.
Not later than 60 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, Congress shall com-
mission a report that contains the following:
(1) A national strategy to address Mexican
drug cartels, and a determination regarding
whether there should be a designation estab-
lished to address such cartels.
(2) Information relating to actions by such
cartels that causes harm to the United
States.
SEC. 124. GAO STUDY ON COSTS INCURRED BY
STATES TO SECURE THE SOUTH-
WEST BORDER.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—Not later than 90 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act,
the Comptroller General of the United States
shall conduct a study to examine the costs
incurred by individual States as a result of
actions taken by such States in support of
the Federal mission to secure the southwest
border, and the feasibility of a program to
reimburse such States for such costs.
(b) C
ONTENTS
.—The study required under
subsection (a) shall include consideration of
the following:
(1) Actions taken by the Department of
Homeland Security that have contributed to
costs described in such subsection incurred
by States to secure the border in the absence
of Federal action, including the termination
of the Migrant Protection Protocols and can-
cellation of border wall construction.
(2) Actions taken by individual States
along the southwest border to secure their
borders, and the costs associated with such
actions.
(3) The feasibility of a program within the
Department of Homeland Security to reim-
burse States for the costs incurred in sup-
port of the Federal mission to secure the
southwest border.
SEC. 125. REPORT BY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF
THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY.
(a) R
EPORT
.—Not later than one year after
the date of the enactment of this Act and an-
nually thereafter for five years, the Inspec-
tor General of the Department of Homeland
Security shall submit to the Committee on
Homeland Security of the House of Rep-
resentatives and the Committee on Home-
land Security and Governmental Affairs of
the Senate a report examining the economic
and security impact of mass migration to
municipalities and States along the south-
west border. Such report shall include infor-
mation regarding costs incurred by the fol-
lowing:
(1) State and local law enforcement to se-
cure the southwest border.
(2) Public school districts to educate stu-
dents who are aliens unlawfully present in
the United States.
(3) Healthcare providers to provide care to
aliens unlawfully present in the United
States who have not paid for such care.
(4) Farmers and ranchers due to migration
impacts to their properties.
(b) C
ONSULTATION
.—To produce the report
required under subsection (a), the Inspector
General of the Department of Homeland Se-
curity shall consult with the individuals and
representatives of the entities described in
paragraphs (1) through (4) of such subsection.
SEC. 126. OFFSETTING AUTHORIZATIONS OF AP-
PROPRIATIONS.
(a) O
FFICE OF THE
S
ECRETARY AND
E
MER
-
GENCY
M
ANAGEMENT
.—No funds are author-
ized to be appropriated for the Alternatives
to Detention Case Management Pilot Pro-
gram or the Office of the Immigration De-
tention Ombudsman for the Office of the
Secretary and Emergency Management of
the Department of Homeland Security.
(b) M
ANAGEMENT
D
IRECTORATE
.—No funds
are authorized to be appropriated for electric
vehicles or St. Elizabeths campus construc-
tion for the Management Directorate of the
Department of Homeland Security.
(c) I
NTELLIGENCE
, A
NALYSIS
,
AND
S
ITUA
-
TIONAL
A
WARENESS
.—There is authorized to
be appropriated $216,000,000 for Intelligence,
Analysis, and Situational Awareness of the
Department of Homeland Security.
(d) U.S. C
USTOMS AND
B
ORDER
P
ROTEC
-
TION
.—No funds are authorized to be appro-
priated for the Shelter Services Program for
U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
SEC. 127. REPORT TO CONGRESS ON FOREIGN
TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—Not later than 90 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act
and annually thereafter for five years, the
Secretary of Homeland Security shall sub-
mit to the Committee on Homeland Security
of the House of Representatives and the
Committee on Homeland Security and Gov-
ernmental Affairs of the Senate an assess-
ment of foreign terrorist organizations at-
tempting to move their members or affili-
ates into the United States through the
southern, northern, or maritime border.
(b) D
EFINITION
.—In this section, the term
‘‘foreign terrorist organization’’ means an
organization described in section 219 of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.
1189).
SEC. 128. ASSESSMENT BY INSPECTOR GENERAL
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOME-
LAND SECURITY ON THE MITIGA-
TION OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYS-
TEMS AT THE SOUTHWEST BORDER.
Not later than 90 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Inspector General
of the Department of Homeland Security
shall submit to the Committee on Homeland
Security of the House of Representatives and
the Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs of the Senate an as-
sessment of U.S. Customs and Border Protec-
tion’s ability to mitigate unmanned aircraft
systems at the southwest border. Such as-
sessment shall include information regard-
ing any intervention between January 1,
2021, and the date of the enactment of this
Act, by any Federal agency affecting in any
manner U.S. Customs and Border Protec-
tion’s authority to so mitigate such systems.
DIVISION D—IMMIGRATION
ENFORCEMENT AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS
TITLE I—ASYLUM REFORM AND BORDER
PROTECTION
SEC. 101. SAFE THIRD COUNTRY.
Section 208(a)(2)(A) of the Immigration and
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158(a)(2)(A)) is
amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘if the Attorney General de-
termines’’ and inserting ‘‘if the Attorney
General or the Secretary of Homeland Secu-
rity determines—’’;
(2) by striking ‘‘that the alien may be re-
moved’’ and inserting the following:
‘‘(i) that the alien may be removed’’;
(3) by striking ‘‘, pursuant to a bilateral or
multilateral agreement, to’’ and inserting
‘‘to’’;
(4) by inserting ‘‘or the Secretary, on a
case by case basis,’’ before ‘‘finds that’’;
(5) by striking the period at the end and in-
serting ‘‘; or’’; and
(6) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(ii) that the alien entered, attempted to
enter, or arrived in the United States after
transiting through at least one country out-
side the alien’s country of citizenship, na-
tionality, or last lawful habitual residence
en route to the United States, unless—
‘‘(I) the alien demonstrates that he or she
applied for protection from persecution or
torture in at least one country outside the
alien’s country of citizenship, nationality, or
last lawful habitual residence through which
the alien transited en route to the United
States, and the alien received a final judg-
ment denying the alien protection in each
country;
‘‘(II) the alien demonstrates that he or she
was a victim of a severe form of trafficking
in which a commercial sex act was induced
by force, fraud, or coercion, or in which the
person induced to perform such act was
under the age of 18 years; or in which the
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.015 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSEH4880 September 29, 2023
trafficking included the recruitment, har-
boring, transportation, provision, or obtain-
ing of a person for labor or services through
the use of force, fraud, or coercion for the
purpose of subjection to involuntary ser-
vitude, peonage, debt bondage, or slavery,
and was unable to apply for protection from
persecution in each country through which
the alien transited en route to the United
States as a result of such severe form of traf-
ficking; or
‘‘(III) the only countries through which the
alien transited en route to the United States
were, at the time of the transit, not parties
to the 1951 United Nations Convention relat-
ing to the Status of Refugees, the 1967 Pro-
tocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, or
the United Nations Convention against Tor-
ture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment.’’.
SEC. 102. CREDIBLE FEAR INTERVIEWS.
Section 235(b)(1)(B)(v) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(1)(B)(v))
is amended by striking ‘‘there is a signifi-
cant possibility’’ and all that follows, and in-
serting ‘‘, taking into account the credibility
of the statements made by the alien in sup-
port of the alien’s claim, as determined pur-
suant to section 208(b)(1)(B)(iii), and such
other facts as are known to the officer, the
alien more likely than not could establish
eligibility for asylum under section 208, and
it is more likely than not that the state-
ments made by, and on behalf of, the alien in
support of the alien’s claim are true.’’.
SEC. 103. CLARIFICATION OF ASYLUM ELIGI-
BILITY.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—Section 208(b)(1)(A) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.
1158(b)(1)(A)) is amended by inserting after
‘‘section 101(a)(42)(A)’’ the following: ‘‘(in ac-
cordance with the rules set forth in this sec-
tion), and is eligible to apply for asylum
under subsection (a)’’.
(b) P
LACE OF
A
RRIVAL
.—Section 208(a)(1) of
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8
U.S.C. 1158(a)(1)) is amended—
(1) by striking ‘‘or who arrives in the
United States (whether or not at a des-
ignated port of arrival and including an alien
who is brought to the United States after
having been interdicted in international or
United States waters),’’; and
(2) by inserting after ‘‘United States’’ the
following: ‘‘and has arrived in the United
States at a port of entry (including an alien
who is brought to the United States after
having been interdicted in international or
United States waters),’’.
SEC. 104. EXCEPTIONS.
Paragraph (2) of section 208(b) of the Immi-
gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.
1158(b)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(2) E
XCEPTIONS
.—
‘‘(A) I
N GENERAL
.—Paragraph (1) shall not
apply to an alien if the Secretary of Home-
land Security or the Attorney General deter-
mines that—
‘‘(i) the alien ordered, incited, assisted, or
otherwise participated in the persecution of
any person on account of race, religion, na-
tionality, membership in a particular social
group, or political opinion;
‘‘(ii) the alien has been convicted of any
felony under Federal, State, tribal, or local
law;
‘‘(iii) the alien has been convicted of any
misdemeanor offense under Federal, State,
tribal, or local law involving—
‘‘(I) the unlawful possession or use of an
identification document, authentication fea-
ture, or false identification document (as
those terms and phrases are defined in the
jurisdiction where the conviction occurred),
unless the alien can establish that the con-
viction resulted from circumstances showing
that—
‘‘(aa) the document or feature was pre-
sented before boarding a common carrier;
‘‘(bb) the document or feature related to
the alien’s eligibility to enter the United
States;
‘‘(cc) the alien used the document or fea-
ture to depart a country wherein the alien
has claimed a fear of persecution; and
‘‘(dd) the alien claimed a fear of persecu-
tion without delay upon presenting himself
or herself to an immigration officer upon ar-
rival at a United States port of entry;
‘‘(II) the unlawful receipt of a Federal pub-
lic benefit (as defined in section 401(c) of the
Personal Responsibility and Work Oppor-
tunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C.
1611(c))), from a Federal entity, or the unlaw-
ful receipt of similar public benefits from a
State, tribal, or local entity; or
‘‘(III) possession or trafficking of a con-
trolled substance or controlled substance
paraphernalia, as those phrases are defined
under the law of the jurisdiction where the
conviction occurred, other than a single of-
fense involving possession for one’s own use
of 30 grams or less of marijuana (as mari-
juana is defined under the law of the juris-
diction where the conviction occurred);
‘‘(iv) the alien has been convicted of an of-
fense arising under paragraph (1)(A) or (2) of
section 274(a), or under section 276;
‘‘(v) the alien has been convicted of a Fed-
eral, State, tribal, or local crime that the
Attorney General or Secretary of Homeland
Security knows, or has reason to believe,
was committed in support, promotion, or
furtherance of the activity of a criminal
street gang (as defined under the law of the
jurisdiction where the conviction occurred or
in section 521(a) of title 18, United States
Code);
‘‘(vi) the alien has been convicted of an of-
fense for driving while intoxicated or im-
paired, as those terms are defined under the
law of the jurisdiction where the conviction
occurred (including a conviction for driving
while under the influence of or impaired by
alcohol or drugs), without regard to whether
the conviction is classified as a misdemeanor
or felony under Federal, State, tribal, or
local law, in which such intoxicated or im-
paired driving was a cause of serious bodily
injury or death of another person;
‘‘(vii) the alien has been convicted of more
than one offense for driving while intoxi-
cated or impaired, as those terms are defined
under the law of the jurisdiction where the
conviction occurred (including a conviction
for driving while under the influence of or
impaired by alcohol or drugs), without re-
gard to whether the conviction is classified
as a misdemeanor or felony under Federal,
State, tribal, or local law;
‘‘(viii) the alien has been convicted of a
crime—
‘‘(I) that involves conduct amounting to a
crime of stalking;
‘‘(II) of child abuse, child neglect, or child
abandonment; or
‘‘(III) that involves conduct amounting to
a domestic assault or battery offense, includ-
ing—
‘‘(aa) a misdemeanor crime of domestic vi-
olence, as described in section 921(a)(33) of
title 18, United States Code;
‘‘(bb) a crime of domestic violence, as de-
scribed in section 40002(a)(12) of the Violence
Against Women Act of 1994 (34 U.S.C.
12291(a)(12)); or
‘‘(cc) any crime based on conduct in which
the alien harassed, coerced, intimidated, vol-
untarily or recklessly used (or threatened to
use) force or violence against, or inflicted
physical injury or physical pain, however
slight, upon a person—
‘‘(AA) who is a current or former spouse of
the alien;
‘‘(BB) with whom the alien shares a child;
‘‘(CC) who is cohabitating with, or who has
cohabitated with, the alien as a spouse;
‘‘(DD) who is similarly situated to a spouse
of the alien under the domestic or family vi-
olence laws of the jurisdiction where the of-
fense occurred; or
‘‘(EE) who is protected from that alien’s
acts under the domestic or family violence
laws of the United States or of any State,
tribal government, or unit of local govern-
ment;
‘‘(ix) the alien has engaged in acts of bat-
tery or extreme cruelty upon a person and
the person—
‘‘(I) is a current or former spouse of the
alien;
‘‘(II) shares a child with the alien;
‘‘(III) cohabitates or has cohabitated with
the alien as a spouse;
‘‘(IV) is similarly situated to a spouse of
the alien under the domestic or family vio-
lence laws of the jurisdiction where the of-
fense occurred; or
‘‘(V) is protected from that alien’s acts
under the domestic or family violence laws
of the United States or of any State, tribal
government, or unit of local government;
‘‘(x) the alien, having been convicted by a
final judgment of a particularly serious
crime, constitutes a danger to the commu-
nity of the United States;
‘‘(xi) there are serious reasons for believing
that the alien has committed a serious non-
political crime outside the United States
prior to the arrival of the alien in the United
States;
‘‘(xii) there are reasonable grounds for re-
garding the alien as a danger to the security
of the United States;
‘‘(xiii) the alien is described in subclause
(I), (II), (III), (IV), or (VI) of section
212(a)(3)(B)(i) or section 237(a)(4)(B) (relating
to terrorist activity), unless, in the case only
of an alien inadmissible under subclause (IV)
of section 212(a)(3)(B)(i), the Secretary of
Homeland Security or the Attorney General
determines, in the Secretary’s or the Attor-
ney General’s discretion, that there are not
reasonable grounds for regarding the alien as
a danger to the security of the United
States;
‘‘(xiv) the alien was firmly resettled in an-
other country prior to arriving in the United
States; or
‘‘(xv) there are reasonable grounds for con-
cluding the alien could avoid persecution by
relocating to another part of the alien’s
country of nationality or, in the case of an
alien having no nationality, another part of
the alien’s country of last habitual resi-
dence.
‘‘(B) S
PECIAL RULES
.—
‘‘(i) P
ARTICULARLY SERIOUS CRIME
;
SERIOUS
NONPOLITICAL CRIME OUTSIDE THE UNITED
STATES
.—
‘‘(I) I
N GENERAL
.—For purposes of subpara-
graph (A)(x), the Attorney General or Sec-
retary of Homeland Security, in their discre-
tion, may determine that a conviction con-
stitutes a particularly serious crime based
on—
‘‘(aa) the nature of the conviction;
‘‘(bb) the type of sentence imposed; or
‘‘(cc) the circumstances and underlying
facts of the conviction.
‘‘(II) D
ETERMINATION
.—In making a deter-
mination under subclause (I), the Attorney
General or Secretary of Homeland Security
may consider all reliable information and is
not limited to facts found by the criminal
court or provided in the underlying record of
conviction.
‘‘(III) T
REATMENT OF FELONIES
.—In making
a determination under subclause (I), an alien
who has been convicted of a felony (as de-
fined under this section) or an aggravated
felony (as defined under section 101(a)(43)),
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.015 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSE H4881 September 29, 2023
shall be considered to have been convicted of
a particularly serious crime.
‘‘(IV) I
NTERPOL RED NOTICE
.—In making a
determination under subparagraph (A)(xi),
an Interpol Red Notice may constitute reli-
able evidence that the alien has committed a
serious nonpolitical crime outside the
United States.
‘‘(ii) C
RIMES AND EXCEPTIONS
.—
‘‘(I) D
RIVING WHILE INTOXICATED OR IM
-
PAIRED
.—A finding under subparagraph
(A)(vi) does not require the Attorney General
or Secretary of Homeland Security to find
the first conviction for driving while intoxi-
cated or impaired (including a conviction for
driving while under the influence of or im-
paired by alcohol or drugs) as a predicate of-
fense. The Attorney General or Secretary of
Homeland Security need only make a factual
determination that the alien previously was
convicted for driving while intoxicated or
impaired as those terms are defined under
the jurisdiction where the conviction oc-
curred (including a conviction for driving
while under the influence of or impaired by
alcohol or drugs).
‘‘(II) S
TALKING AND OTHER CRIMES
.—In
making a determination under subparagraph
(A)(viii), including determining the existence
of a domestic relationship between the alien
and the victim, the underlying conduct of
the crime may be considered, and the Attor-
ney General or Secretary of Homeland Secu-
rity is not limited to facts found by the
criminal court or provided in the underlying
record of conviction.
‘‘(III) B
ATTERY OR EXTREME CRUELTY
.—In
making a determination under subparagraph
(A)(ix), the phrase ‘battery or extreme cru-
elty’ includes—
‘‘(aa) any act or threatened act of violence,
including any forceful detention, which re-
sults or threatens to result in physical or
mental injury;
‘‘(bb) psychological or sexual abuse or ex-
ploitation, including rape, molestation, in-
cest, or forced prostitution, shall be consid-
ered acts of violence; and
‘‘(cc) other abusive acts, including acts
that, in and of themselves, may not initially
appear violent, but that are a part of an
overall pattern of violence.
‘‘(IV) E
XCEPTION FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE
.—An alien who was convicted of an
offense described in clause (viii) or (ix) of
subparagraph (A) is not ineligible for asylum
on that basis if the alien satisfies the cri-
teria under section 237(a)(7)(A).
‘‘(C) S
PECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES
.—Paragraph
(1) shall not apply to an alien whose claim is
based on—
‘‘(i) personal animus or retribution, includ-
ing personal animus in which the alleged
persecutor has not targeted, or manifested
an animus against, other members of an al-
leged particular social group in addition to
the member who has raised the claim at
issue;
‘‘(ii) the applicant’s generalized dis-
approval of, disagreement with, or opposi-
tion to criminal, terrorist, gang, guerilla, or
other non-state organizations absent expres-
sive behavior in furtherance of a discrete
cause against such organizations related to
control of a State or expressive behavior
that is antithetical to the State or a legal
unit of the State;
‘‘(iii) the applicant’s resistance to recruit-
ment or coercion by guerrilla, criminal,
gang, terrorist, or other non-state organiza-
tions;
‘‘(iv) the targeting of the applicant for
criminal activity for financial gain based on
wealth or affluence or perceptions of wealth
or affluence;
‘‘(v) the applicant’s criminal activity; or
‘‘(vi) the applicant’s perceived, past or
present, gang affiliation.
‘‘(D) D
EFINITIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS
.—
‘‘(i) D
EFINITIONS
.—For purposes of this
paragraph:
‘‘(I) F
ELONY
.—The term ‘felony’ means—
‘‘(aa) any crime defined as a felony by the
relevant jurisdiction (Federal, State, tribal,
or local) of conviction; or
‘‘(bb) any crime punishable by more than
one year of imprisonment.
‘‘(II) M
ISDEMEANOR
.—The term ‘mis-
demeanor’ means—
‘‘(aa) any crime defined as a misdemeanor
by the relevant jurisdiction (Federal, State,
tribal, or local) of conviction; or
‘‘(bb) any crime not punishable by more
than one year of imprisonment.
‘‘(ii) C
LARIFICATIONS
.—
‘‘(I) C
ONSTRUCTION
.—For purposes of this
paragraph, whether any activity or convic-
tion also may constitute a basis for removal
is immaterial to a determination of asylum
eligibility.
‘‘(II) A
TTEMPT
,
CONSPIRACY
,
OR SOLICITA
-
TION
.—For purposes of this paragraph, all
references to a criminal offense or criminal
conviction shall be deemed to include any
attempt, conspiracy, or solicitation to com-
mit the offense or any other inchoate form of
the offense.
‘‘(III) E
FFECT OF CERTAIN ORDERS
.—
‘‘(aa) I
N GENERAL
.—No order vacating a
conviction, modifying a sentence, clarifying
a sentence, or otherwise altering a convic-
tion or sentence shall have any effect under
this paragraph unless the Attorney General
or Secretary of Homeland Security deter-
mines that—
‘‘(AA) the court issuing the order had juris-
diction and authority to do so; and
‘‘(BB) the order was not entered for reha-
bilitative purposes or for purposes of amelio-
rating the immigration consequences of the
conviction or sentence.
‘‘(bb) A
MELIORATING IMMIGRATION CON
-
SEQUENCES
.—For purposes of item (aa)(BB),
the order shall be presumed to be for the pur-
pose of ameliorating immigration con-
sequences if—
‘‘(AA) the order was entered after the initi-
ation of any proceeding to remove the alien
from the United States; or
‘‘(BB) the alien moved for the order more
than one year after the date of the original
order of conviction or sentencing, whichever
is later.
‘‘(cc) A
UTHORITY OF IMMIGRATION JUDGE
.—
An immigration judge is not limited to con-
sideration only of material included in any
order vacating a conviction, modifying a
sentence, or clarifying a sentence to deter-
mine whether such order should be given any
effect under this paragraph, but may con-
sider such additional information as the im-
migration judge determines appropriate.
‘‘(E) A
DDITIONAL LIMITATIONS
.—The Sec-
retary of Homeland Security or the Attorney
General may by regulation establish addi-
tional limitations and conditions, consistent
with this section, under which an alien shall
be ineligible for asylum under paragraph (1).
‘‘(F) N
O JUDICIAL REVIEW
.—There shall be
no judicial review of a determination of the
Secretary of Homeland Security or the At-
torney General under subparagraph
(A)(xiii).’’.
SEC. 105. EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION.
Paragraph (2) of section 208(d) of the Immi-
gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158(d))
is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(2) E
MPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION
.—
‘‘(A) A
UTHORIZATION PERMITTED
.—An appli-
cant for asylum is not entitled to employ-
ment authorization, but such authorization
may be provided under regulation by the
Secretary of Homeland Security. An appli-
cant who is not otherwise eligible for em-
ployment authorization shall not be granted
such authorization prior to the date that is
180 days after the date of filing of the appli-
cation for asylum.
‘‘(B) T
ERMINATION
.—Each grant of employ-
ment authorization under subparagraph (A),
and any renewal or extension thereof, shall
be valid for a period of 6 months, except that
such authorization, renewal, or extension
shall terminate prior to the end of such 6
month period as follows:
‘‘(i) Immediately following the denial of an
asylum application by an asylum officer, un-
less the case is referred to an immigration
judge.
‘‘(ii) 30 days after the date on which an im-
migration judge denies an asylum applica-
tion, unless the alien timely appeals to the
Board of Immigration Appeals.
‘‘(iii) Immediately following the denial by
the Board of Immigration Appeals of an ap-
peal of a denial of an asylum application.
‘‘(C) R
ENEWAL
.—The Secretary of Home-
land Security may not grant, renew, or ex-
tend employment authorization to an alien if
the alien was previously granted employ-
ment authorization under subparagraph (A),
and the employment authorization was ter-
minated pursuant to a circumstance de-
scribed in subparagraph (B)(i), (ii), or (iii),
unless a Federal court of appeals remands
the alien’s case to the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
‘‘(D) I
NELIGIBILITY
.—The Secretary of
Homeland Security may not grant employ-
ment authorization to an alien under this
paragraph if the alien—
‘‘(i) is ineligible for asylum under sub-
section (b)(2)(A); or
‘‘(ii) entered or attempted to enter the
United States at a place and time other than
lawfully through a United States port of
entry.’’.
SEC. 106. ASYLUM FEES.
Paragraph (3) of section 208(d) of the Immi-
gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158(d))
is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(3) F
EES
.—
‘‘(A) A
PPLICATION FEE
.—A fee of not less
than $50 for each application for asylum
shall be imposed. Such fee shall not exceed
the cost of adjudicating the application.
Such fee shall not apply to an unaccom-
panied alien child who files an asylum appli-
cation in proceedings under section 240.
‘‘(B) E
MPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION
.—A fee
may also be imposed for the consideration of
an application for employment authorization
under this section and for adjustment of sta-
tus under section 209(b). Such a fee shall not
exceed the cost of adjudicating the applica-
tion.
‘‘(C) P
AYMENT
.—Fees under this paragraph
may be assessed and paid over a period of
time or by installments.
‘‘(D) R
ULE OF CONSTRUCTION
.—Nothing in
this paragraph shall be construed to limit
the authority of the Attorney General or
Secretary of Homeland Security to set adju-
dication and naturalization fees in accord-
ance with section 286(m).’’.
SEC. 107. RULES FOR DETERMINING ASYLUM ELI-
GIBILITY.
Section 208 of the Immigration and Nation-
ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158) is amended by add-
ing at the end the following:
‘‘(f) R
ULES FOR
D
ETERMINING
A
SYLUM
E
LIGI
-
BILITY
.—In making a determination under
subsection (b)(1)(A) with respect to whether
an alien is a refugee within the meaning of
section 101(a)(42)(A), the following shall
apply:
‘‘(1) P
ARTICULAR SOCIAL GROUP
.—The Sec-
retary of Homeland Security or the Attorney
General shall not determine that an alien is
a member of a particular social group unless
the alien articulates on the record, or pro-
vides a basis on the record for determining,
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.015 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSEH4882 September 29, 2023
the definition and boundaries of the alleged
particular social group, establishes that the
particular social group exists independently
from the alleged persecution, and establishes
that the alien’s claim of membership in a
particular social group does not involve—
‘‘(A) past or present criminal activity or
association (including gang membership);
‘‘(B) presence in a country with generalized
violence or a high crime rate;
‘‘(C) being the subject of a recruitment ef-
fort by criminal, terrorist, or persecutory
groups;
‘‘(D) the targeting of the applicant for
criminal activity for financial gain based on
perceptions of wealth or affluence;
‘‘(E) interpersonal disputes of which gov-
ernmental authorities in the relevant soci-
ety or region were unaware or uninvolved;
‘‘(F) private criminal acts of which govern-
mental authorities in the relevant society or
region were unaware or uninvolved;
‘‘(G) past or present terrorist activity or
association;
‘‘(H) past or present persecutory activity
or association; or
‘‘(I) status as an alien returning from the
United States.
‘‘(2) P
OLITICAL OPINION
.—The Secretary of
Homeland Security or the Attorney General
may not determine that an alien holds a po-
litical opinion with respect to which the
alien is subject to persecution if the political
opinion is constituted solely by generalized
disapproval of, disagreement with, or opposi-
tion to criminal, terrorist, gang, guerilla, or
other non-state organizations and does not
include expressive behavior in furtherance of
a cause against such organizations related to
efforts by the State to control such organiza-
tions or behavior that is antithetical to or
otherwise opposes the ruling legal entity of
the State or a unit thereof.
‘‘(3) P
ERSECUTION
.—The Secretary of
Homeland Security or the Attorney General
may not determine that an alien has been
subject to persecution or has a well-founded
fear of persecution based only on—
‘‘(A) the existence of laws or government
policies that are unenforced or infrequently
enforced, unless there is credible evidence
that such a law or policy has been or would
be applied to the applicant personally; or
‘‘(B) the conduct of rogue foreign govern-
ment officials acting outside the scope of
their official capacity.
‘‘(4) D
ISCRETIONARY DETERMINATION
.—
‘‘(A) A
DVERSE DISCRETIONARY FACTORS
.—
The Secretary of Homeland Security or the
Attorney General may only grant asylum to
an alien if the alien establishes that he or
she warrants a favorable exercise of discre-
tion. In making such a determination, the
Attorney General or Secretary of Homeland
Security shall consider, if applicable, an
alien’s use of fraudulent documents to enter
the United States, unless the alien arrived in
the United States by air, sea, or land di-
rectly from the applicant’s home country
without transiting through any other coun-
try.
‘‘(B) F
AVORABLE EXERCISE OF DISCRETION
NOT PERMITTED
.—Except as provided in sub-
paragraph (C), the Attorney General or Sec-
retary of Homeland Security shall not favor-
ably exercise discretion under this section
for any alien who—
‘‘(i) has accrued more than one year of un-
lawful presence in the United States, as de-
fined in sections 212(a)(9)(B)(ii) and (iii),
prior to filing an application for asylum;
‘‘(ii) at the time the asylum application is
filed with the immigration court or is re-
ferred from the Department of Homeland Se-
curity, has—
‘‘(I) failed to timely file (or timely file a
request for an extension of time to file) any
required Federal, State, or local income tax
returns;
‘‘(II) failed to satisfy any outstanding Fed-
eral, State, or local tax obligations; or
‘‘(III) income that would result in tax li-
ability under section 1 of the Internal Rev-
enue Code of 1986 and that was not reported
to the Internal Revenue Service;
‘‘(iii) has had two or more prior asylum ap-
plications denied for any reason;
‘‘(iv) has withdrawn a prior asylum appli-
cation with prejudice or been found to have
abandoned a prior asylum application;
‘‘(v) failed to attend an interview regarding
his or her asylum application with the De-
partment of Homeland Security, unless the
alien shows by a preponderance of the evi-
dence that—
‘‘(I) exceptional circumstances prevented
the alien from attending the interview; or
‘‘(II) the interview notice was not mailed
to the last address provided by the alien or
the alien’s representative and neither the
alien nor the alien’s representative received
notice of the interview; or
‘‘(vi) was subject to a final order of re-
moval, deportation, or exclusion and did not
file a motion to reopen to seek asylum based
on changed country conditions within one
year of the change in country conditions.
‘‘(C) E
XCEPTIONS
.—If one or more of the ad-
verse discretionary factors set forth in sub-
paragraph (B) are present, the Attorney Gen-
eral or the Secretary, may, notwithstanding
such subparagraph (B), favorably exercise
discretion under section 208—
‘‘(i) in extraordinary circumstances, such
as those involving national security or for-
eign policy considerations; or
‘‘(ii) if the alien, by clear and convincing
evidence, demonstrates that the denial of the
application for asylum would result in excep-
tional and extremely unusual hardship to
the alien.
‘‘(5) L
IMITATION
.—If the Secretary or the
Attorney General determines that an alien
fails to satisfy the requirement under para-
graph (1), the alien may not be granted asy-
lum based on membership in a particular so-
cial group, and may not appeal the deter-
mination of the Secretary or Attorney Gen-
eral, as applicable. A determination under
this paragraph shall not serve as the basis
for any motion to reopen or reconsider an
application for asylum or withholding of re-
moval for any reason, including a claim of
ineffective assistance of counsel, unless the
alien complies with the procedural require-
ments for such a motion and demonstrates
that counsel’s failure to define, or provide a
basis for defining, a formulation of a par-
ticular social group was both not a strategic
choice and constituted egregious conduct.
‘‘(6) S
TEREOTYPES
.—Evidence offered in
support of an application for asylum that
promotes cultural stereotypes about a coun-
try, its inhabitants, or an alleged persecutor,
including stereotypes based on race, religion,
nationality, or gender, shall not be admis-
sible in adjudicating that application, except
that evidence that an alleged persecutor
holds stereotypical views of the applicant
shall be admissible.
‘‘(7) D
EFINITIONS
.—In this section:
‘‘(A) The term ‘membership in a particular
social group’ means membership in a group
that is—
‘‘(i) composed of members who share a
common immutable characteristic;
‘‘(ii) defined with particularity; and
‘‘(iii) socially distinct within the society in
question.
‘‘(B) The term ‘political opinion’ means an
ideal or conviction in support of the further-
ance of a discrete cause related to political
control of a state or a unit thereof.
‘‘(C) The term ‘persecution’ means the in-
fliction of a severe level of harm consti-
tuting an exigent threat by the government
of a country or by persons or an organization
that the government was unable or unwilling
to control. Such term does not include—
‘‘(i) generalized harm or violence that
arises out of civil, criminal, or military
strife in a country;
‘‘(ii) all treatment that the United States
regards as unfair, offensive, unjust, unlawful,
or unconstitutional;
‘‘(iii) intermittent harassment, including
brief detentions;
‘‘(iv) threats with no actual effort to carry
out the threats, except that particularized
threats of severe harm of an immediate and
menacing nature made by an identified enti-
ty may constitute persecution; or
‘‘(v) non-severe economic harm or property
damage.’’.
SEC. 108. FIRM RESETTLEMENT.
Section 208 of the Immigration and Nation-
ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158), as amended by this
title, is further amended by adding at the
end the following:
‘‘(g) F
IRM
R
ESETTLEMENT
.—In determining
whether an alien was firmly resettled in an-
other country prior to arriving in the United
States under subsection (b)(2)(A)(xiv), the
following shall apply:
‘‘(1) I
N GENERAL
.—An alien shall be consid-
ered to have firmly resettled in another
country if, after the events giving rise to the
alien’s asylum claim—
‘‘(A) the alien resided in a country through
which the alien transited prior to arriving in
or entering the United States and—
‘‘(i) received or was eligible for any perma-
nent legal immigration status in that coun-
try;
‘‘(ii) resided in such a country with any
non-permanent but indefinitely renewable
legal immigration status (including asylee,
refugee, or similar status, but excluding sta-
tus of a tourist); or
‘‘(iii) resided in such a country and could
have applied for and obtained an immigra-
tion status described in clause (ii);
‘‘(B) the alien physically resided volun-
tarily, and without continuing to suffer per-
secution or torture, in any one country for
one year or more after departing his country
of nationality or last habitual residence and
prior to arrival in or entry into the United
States, except for any time spent in Mexico
by an alien who is not a native or citizen of
Mexico solely as a direct result of being re-
turned to Mexico pursuant to section
235(b)(3) or of being subject to metering; or
‘‘(C) the alien is a citizen of a country
other than the country in which the alien al-
leges a fear of persecution, or was a citizen
of such a country in the case of an alien who
renounces such citizenship, and the alien was
present in that country after departing his
country of nationality or last habitual resi-
dence and prior to arrival in or entry into
the United States.
‘‘(2) B
URDEN OF PROOF
.—If an immigration
judge determines that an alien has firmly re-
settled in another country under paragraph
(1), the alien shall bear the burden of proving
the bar does not apply.
‘‘(3) F
IRM RESETTLEMENT OF PARENT
.—An
alien shall be presumed to have been firmly
resettled in another country if the alien’s
parent was firmly resettled in another coun-
try, the parent’s resettlement occurred be-
fore the alien turned 18 years of age, and the
alien resided with such parent at the time of
the firm resettlement, unless the alien estab-
lishes that he or she could not have derived
any permanent legal immigration status or
any non-permanent but indefinitely renew-
able legal immigration status (including asy-
lum, refugee, or similar status, but excluding
status of a tourist) from the alien’s parent.’’.
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.015 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSE H4883 September 29, 2023
SEC. 109. NOTICE CONCERNING FRIVOLOUS ASY-
LUM APPLICATIONS.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—Section 208(d)(4) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.
1158(d)(4)) is amended—
(1) in the matter preceding subparagraph
(A), by inserting ‘‘the Secretary of Homeland
Security or’’ before ‘‘the Attorney General’’;
(2) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘and of
the consequences, under paragraph (6), of
knowingly filing a frivolous application for
asylum; and’’ and inserting a semicolon;
(3) in subparagraph (B), by striking the pe-
riod and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and
(4) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(C) ensure that a written warning appears
on the asylum application advising the alien
of the consequences of filing a frivolous ap-
plication and serving as notice to the alien
of the consequence of filing a frivolous appli-
cation.’’.
(b) C
ONFORMING
A
MENDMENT
.—Section
208(d)(6) of the Immigration and Nationality
Act (8 U.S.C. 1158(d)(6)) is amended by strik-
ing ‘‘If the’’ and all that follows and insert-
ing:
‘‘(A) I
N GENERAL
.—If the Secretary of
Homeland Security or the Attorney General
determines that an alien has knowingly
made a frivolous application for asylum and
the alien has received the notice under para-
graph (4)(C), the alien shall be permanently
ineligible for any benefits under this chap-
ter, effective as the date of the final deter-
mination of such an application.
‘‘(B) C
RITERIA
.—An application is frivolous
if the Secretary of Homeland Security or the
Attorney General determines, consistent
with subparagraph (C), that—
‘‘(i) it is so insufficient in substance that it
is clear that the applicant knowingly filed
the application solely or in part to delay re-
moval from the United States, to seek em-
ployment authorization as an applicant for
asylum pursuant to regulations issued pursu-
ant to paragraph (2), or to seek issuance of a
Notice to Appear in order to pursue Can-
cellation of Removal under section 240A(b);
or
‘‘(ii) any of the material elements are
knowingly fabricated.
‘‘(C) S
UFFICIENT OPPORTUNITY TO CLARIFY
.—
In determining that an application is frivo-
lous, the Secretary or the Attorney General,
must be satisfied that the applicant, during
the course of the proceedings, has had suffi-
cient opportunity to clarify any discrep-
ancies or implausible aspects of the claim.
‘‘(D) W
ITHHOLDING OF REMOVAL NOT PRE
-
CLUDED
.—For purposes of this section, a find-
ing that an alien filed a frivolous asylum ap-
plication shall not preclude the alien from
seeking withholding of removal under sec-
tion 241(b)(3) or protection pursuant to the
Convention Against Torture.’’.
SEC. 110. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.
Section 208 of the Immigration and Nation-
ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) in paragraph (2)(D), by inserting ‘‘Sec-
retary of Homeland Security or the’’ before
‘‘Attorney General’’; and
(B) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘Sec-
retary of Homeland Security or the’’ before
‘‘Attorney General’’;
(2) in subsection (c)—
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Attorney
General’’ each place such term appears and
inserting ‘‘Secretary of Homeland Security’’;
(B) in paragraph (2), in the matter pre-
ceding subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘Sec-
retary of Homeland Security or the’’ before
‘‘Attorney General’’; and
(C) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘Sec-
retary of Homeland Security or the’’ before
‘‘Attorney General’’; and
(3) in subsection (d)—
(A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘Sec-
retary of Homeland Security or the’’ before
‘‘Attorney General’’ each place such term
appears; and
(B) in paragraph (5)—
(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘Attor-
ney General’’ and inserting ‘‘Secretary of
Homeland Security’’; and
(ii) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘Sec-
retary of Homeland Security or the’’ before
‘‘Attorney General’’.
SEC. 111. REQUIREMENT FOR PROCEDURES RE-
LATING TO CERTAIN ASYLUM APPLI-
CATIONS.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—Not later than 30 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act,
the Attorney General shall establish proce-
dures to expedite the adjudication of asylum
applications for aliens—
(1) who are subject to removal proceedings
under section 240 of the Immigration and Na-
tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1229a); and
(2) who are nationals of a Western Hemi-
sphere country sanctioned by the United
States, as described in subsection (b), as of
January 1, 2023.
(b) W
ESTERN
H
EMISPHERE
C
OUNTRY
S
ANC
-
TIONED BY THE
U
NITED
S
TATES
D
ESCRIBED
.—
Subsection (a) shall apply only to an asylum
application filed by an alien who is a na-
tional of a Western Hemisphere country sub-
ject to sanctions pursuant to—
(1) the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Soli-
darity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996 (22 U.S.C.
6021 note);
(2) the Reinforcing Nicaragua’s Adherence
to Conditions for Electoral Reform Act of
2021 or the RENACER Act (50 U.S.C. 1701
note); or
(3) Executive Order 13692 (80 Fed. Reg.
12747; declaring a national emergency with
respect to the situation in Venezuela).
(c) A
PPLICABILITY
.—This section shall only
apply to an alien who files an application for
asylum after the date of the enactment of
this Act.
TITLE II—BORDER SAFETY AND MIGRANT
PROTECTION
SEC. 201. INSPECTION OF APPLICANTS FOR AD-
MISSION.
Section 235 of the Immigration and Nation-
ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1225) is amended—
(1) in subsection (b)—
(A) in paragraph (1)—
(i) in subparagraph (A)—
(I) in clauses (i) and (ii), by striking ‘‘sec-
tion 212(a)(6)(C)’’ inserting ‘‘subparagraph
(A) or (C) of section 212(a)(6)’’; and
(II) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(iv) I
NELIGIBILITY FOR PAROLE
.—An alien
described in clause (i) or (ii) shall not be eli-
gible for parole except as expressly author-
ized pursuant to section 212(d)(5), or for pa-
role or release pursuant to section 236(a).’’;
and
(ii) in subparagraph (B)—
(I) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘asylum.’’ and
inserting ‘‘asylum and shall not be released
(including pursuant to parole or release pur-
suant to section 236(a) but excluding as ex-
pressly authorized pursuant to section
212(d)(5)) other than to be removed or re-
turned to a country as described in para-
graph (3).’’; and
(II) in clause (iii)(IV)—
(aa) in the header by striking ‘‘
DETENTION
’’
and inserting ‘‘
DETENTION
,
RETURN
,
OR RE
-
MOVAL
’’; and
(bb) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘The alien shall not be released (including
pursuant to parole or release pursuant to
section 236(a) but excluding as expressly au-
thorized pursuant to section 212(d)(5)) other
than to be removed or returned to a country
as described in paragraph (3).’’;
(B) in paragraph (2)—
(i) in subparagraph (A)—
(I) by striking ‘‘Subject to subparagraphs
(B) and (C),’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to sub-
paragraph (B) and paragraph (3),’’; and
(II) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘The alien shall not be released (including
pursuant to parole or release pursuant to
section 236(a) but excluding as expressly au-
thorized pursuant to section 212(d)(5)) other
than to be removed or returned to a country
as described in paragraph (3).’’; and
(ii) by striking subparagraph (C);
(C) by redesignating paragraph (3) as para-
graph (5); and
(D) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol-
lowing:
‘‘(3) R
ETURN TO FOREIGN TERRITORY CONTIG
-
UOUS TO THE UNITED STATES
.—
‘‘(A) I
N GENERAL
.—The Secretary of Home-
land Security may return to a foreign terri-
tory contiguous to the United States any
alien arriving on land from that territory
(whether or not at a designated port of
entry) pending a proceeding under section
240 or review of a determination under sub-
section (b)(1)(B)(iii)(III).
‘‘(B) M
ANDATORY RETURN
.—If at any time
the Secretary of Homeland Security can-
not—
‘‘(i) comply with its obligations to detain
an alien as required under clauses (ii) and
(iii)(IV) of subsection (b)(1)(B) and sub-
section (b)(2)(A); or
‘‘(ii) remove an alien to a country de-
scribed in section 208(a)(2)(A),
the Secretary of Homeland Security shall,
without exception, including pursuant to pa-
role or release pursuant to section 236(a) but
excluding as expressly authorized pursuant
to section 212(d)(5), return to a foreign terri-
tory contiguous to the United States any
alien arriving on land from that territory
(whether or not at a designated port of
entry) pending a proceeding under section
240 or review of a determination under sub-
section (b)(1)(B)(iii)(III).
‘‘(4) E
NFORCEMENT BY STATE ATTORNEYS
GENERAL
.—The attorney general of a State,
or other authorized State officer, alleging a
violation of the detention, return, or re-
moval requirements under paragraph (1), (2),
or (3) that affects such State or its residents,
may bring an action against the Secretary of
Homeland Security on behalf of the residents
of the State in an appropriate United States
district court to obtain appropriate injunc-
tive relief.’’; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(e) A
UTHORITY
T
O
P
ROHIBIT
I
NTRODUCTION
OF
C
ERTAIN
A
LIENS
.—If the Secretary of
Homeland Security determines, in his discre-
tion, that the prohibition of the introduction
of aliens who are inadmissible under sub-
paragraph (A) or (C) of section 212(a)(6) or
under section 212(a)(7) at an international
land or maritime border of the United States
is necessary to achieve operational control
(as defined in section 2 of the Secure Fence
Act of 2006 (8 U.S.C. 1701 note)) of such bor-
der, the Secretary may prohibit, in whole or
in part, the introduction of such aliens at
such border for such period of time as the
Secretary determines is necessary for such
purpose.’’.
SEC. 202. OPERATIONAL DETENTION FACILITIES.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—Not later than September
30, 2023, the Secretary of Homeland Security
shall take all necessary actions to reopen or
restore all U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement detention facilities that were
in operation on January 20, 2021, that subse-
quently closed or with respect to which the
use was altered, reduced, or discontinued
after January 20, 2021. In carrying out the re-
quirement under this subsection, the Sec-
retary may use the authority under section
103(a)(11) of the Immigration and Nationality
Act (8 U.S.C. 1103(a)(11)).
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.015 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSEH4884 September 29, 2023
(b) S
PECIFIC
F
ACILITIES
.—The requirement
under subsection (a) shall include at a min-
imum, reopening, or restoring, the following
facilities:
(1) Irwin County Detention Center in Geor-
gia.
(2) C. Carlos Carreiro Immigration Deten-
tion Center in Bristol County, Massachu-
setts.
(3) Etowah County Detention Center in
Gadsden, Alabama.
(4) Glades County Detention Center in
Moore Haven, Florida.
(5) South Texas Family Residential Center.
(c) E
XCEPTION
.—
(1) I
N GENERAL
.—Except as provided in
paragraphs (2) and (3), the Secretary of
Homeland Security is authorized to obtain
equivalent capacity for detention facilities
at locations other than those listed in sub-
section (b).
(2) L
IMITATION
.—The Secretary may not
take action under paragraph (1) unless the
capacity obtained would result in a reduc-
tion of time and cost relative to the cost and
time otherwise required to obtain such ca-
pacity.
(3) S
OUTH TEXAS FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CEN
-
TER
.—The exception under paragraph (1)
shall not apply to the South Texas Family
Residential Center. The Secretary shall take
all necessary steps to modify and operate the
South Texas Family Residential Center in
the same manner and capability it was oper-
ating on January 20, 2021.
(d) P
ERIODIC
R
EPORT
.—Not later than 90
days after the date of the enactment of this
Act, and every 90 days thereafter until Sep-
tember 30, 2027, the Secretary of Homeland
Security shall submit to the appropriate
congressional committees a detailed plan for
and a status report on—
(1) compliance with the deadline under
subsection (a);
(2) the increase in detention capabilities
required by this section—
(A) for the 90-day period immediately pre-
ceding the date such report is submitted; and
(B) for the period beginning on the first
day of the fiscal year during which the re-
port is submitted, and ending on the date
such report is submitted;
(3) the number of detention beds that were
used and the number of available detention
beds that were not used during—
(A) the 90-day period immediately pre-
ceding the date such report is submitted; and
(B) the period beginning on the first day of
the fiscal year during which the report is
submitted, and ending on the date such re-
port is submitted;
(4) the number of aliens released due to a
lack of available detention beds; and
(5) the resources the Department of Home-
land Security needs in order to comply with
the requirements under this section.
(e) N
OTIFICATION
.—The Secretary of Home-
land Security shall notify Congress, and in-
clude with such notification a detailed de-
scription of the resources the Department of
Homeland Security needs in order to detain
all aliens whose detention is mandatory or
nondiscretionary under the Immigration and
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.)—
(1) not later than 5 days after all U.S. Im-
migration and Customs Enforcement deten-
tion facilities reach 90 percent of capacity;
(2) not later than 5 days after all U.S. Im-
migration and Customs Enforcement deten-
tion facilities reach 95 percent of capacity;
and
(3) not later than 5 days after all U.S. Im-
migration and Customs Enforcement deten-
tion facilities reach full capacity.
(f) A
PPROPRIATE
C
ONGRESSIONAL
C
OMMIT
-
TEES
.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate
congressional committees’’ means—
(1) the Committee on the Judiciary of the
House of Representatives;
(2) the Committee on Appropriations of the
House of Representatives;
(3) the Committee on the Judiciary of the
Senate; and
(4) the Committee on Appropriations of the
Senate.
TITLE III—PREVENTING UNCONTROLLED
MIGRATION FLOWS IN THE WESTERN
HEMISPHERE
SEC. 301. UNITED STATES POLICY REGARDING
WESTERN HEMISPHERE COOPERA-
TION ON IMMIGRATION AND ASY-
LUM.
It is the policy of the United States to
enter into agreements, accords, and memo-
randa of understanding with countries in the
Western Hemisphere, the purposes of which
are to advance the interests of the United
States by reducing costs associated with ille-
gal immigration and to protect the human
capital, societal traditions, and economic
growth of other countries in the Western
Hemisphere. It is further the policy of the
United States to ensure that humanitarian
and development assistance funding aimed
at reducing illegal immigration is not ex-
pended on programs that have not proven to
reduce illegal immigrant flows in the aggre-
gate.
SEC. 302. NEGOTIATIONS BY SECRETARY OF
STATE.
(a) A
UTHORIZATION
T
O
N
EGOTIATE
.—The
Secretary of State shall seek to negotiate
agreements, accords, and memoranda of un-
derstanding between the United States, Mex-
ico, Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala, and
other countries in the Western Hemisphere
with respect to cooperation and burden shar-
ing required for effective regional immigra-
tion enforcement, expediting legal claims by
aliens for asylum, and the processing, deten-
tion, and repatriation of foreign nationals
seeking to enter the United States unlaw-
fully. Such agreements shall be designed to
facilitate a regional approach to immigra-
tion enforcement and shall, at a minimum,
provide that—
(1) the Government of Mexico authorize
and accept the rapid entrance into Mexico of
nationals of countries other than Mexico
who seek asylum in Mexico, and process the
asylum claims of such nationals inside Mex-
ico, in accordance with both domestic law
and international treaties and conventions
governing the processing of asylum claims;
(2) the Government of Mexico authorize
and accept both the rapid entrance into Mex-
ico of all nationals of countries other than
Mexico who are ineligible for asylum in Mex-
ico and wish to apply for asylum in the
United States, whether or not at a port of
entry, and the continued presence of such
nationals in Mexico while they wait for the
adjudication of their asylum claims to con-
clude in the United States;
(3) the Government of Mexico commit to
provide the individuals described in para-
graphs (1) and (2) with appropriate humani-
tarian protections;
(4) the Government of Honduras, the Gov-
ernment of El Salvador, and the Government
of Guatemala each authorize and accept the
entrance into the respective countries of na-
tionals of other countries seeking asylum in
the applicable such country and process such
claims in accordance with applicable domes-
tic law and international treaties and con-
ventions governing the processing of asylum
claims;
(5) the Government of the United States
commit to work to accelerate the adjudica-
tion of asylum claims and to conclude re-
moval proceedings in the wake of asylum ad-
judications as expeditiously as possible;
(6) the Government of the United States
commit to continue to assist the govern-
ments of countries in the Western Hemi-
sphere, such as the Government of Honduras,
the Government of El Salvador, and the Gov-
ernment of Guatemala, by supporting the en-
hancement of asylum capacity in those coun-
tries; and
(7) the Government of the United States
commit to monitoring developments in hem-
ispheric immigration trends and regional
asylum capabilities to determine whether
additional asylum cooperation agreements
are warranted.
(b) N
OTIFICATION IN
A
CCORDANCE
W
ITH
C
ASE
-Z
ABLOCKI
A
CT
.—The Secretary of State
shall, in accordance with section 112b of title
1, United States Code, promptly inform the
relevant congressional committees of each
agreement entered into pursuant to sub-
section (a). Such notifications shall be sub-
mitted not later than 48 hours after such
agreements are signed.
(c) A
LIEN
D
EFINED
.—In this section, the
term ‘‘alien’’ has the meaning given such
term in section 101 of the Immigration and
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101).
SEC. 303. MANDATORY BRIEFINGS ON UNITED
STATES EFFORTS TO ADDRESS THE
BORDER CRISIS.
(a) B
RIEFING
R
EQUIRED
.—Not later than 90
days after the date of the enactment of this
Act, and not less frequently than once every
90 days thereafter until the date described in
subsection (b), the Secretary of State, or the
designee of the Secretary of State, shall pro-
vide to the appropriate congressional com-
mittees an in-person briefing on efforts un-
dertaken pursuant to the negotiation au-
thority provided by section 302 of this title
to monitor, deter, and prevent illegal immi-
gration to the United States, including by
entering into agreements, accords, and
memoranda of understanding with foreign
countries and by using United States foreign
assistance to stem the root causes of migra-
tion in the Western Hemisphere.
(b) T
ERMINATION OF
M
ANDATORY
B
RIEF
-
ING
.—The date described in this subsection is
the date on which the Secretary of State, in
consultation with the heads of other rel-
evant Federal departments and agencies, de-
termines and certifies to the appropriate
congressional committees that illegal immi-
gration flows have subsided to a manageable
rate.
(c) A
PPROPRIATE
C
ONGRESSIONAL
C
OMMIT
-
TEES
D
EFINED
.—In this section, the term
‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’
means the Committee on Foreign Affairs of
the House of Representatives and the Com-
mittee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.
TITLE IV—ENSURING UNITED FAMILIES
AT THE BORDER
SEC. 401. CLARIFICATION OF STANDARDS FOR
FAMILY DETENTION.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—Section 235 of the Wil-
liam Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Pro-
tection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (8 U.S.C.
1232) is amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing:
‘‘(j) C
ONSTRUCTION
.—
‘‘(1) I
N GENERAL
.—Notwithstanding any
other provision of law, judicial determina-
tion, consent decree, or settlement agree-
ment, the detention of any alien child who is
not an unaccompanied alien child shall be
governed by sections 217, 235, 236, and 241 of
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8
U.S.C. 1187, 1225, 1226, and 1231). There is no
presumption that an alien child who is not
an unaccompanied alien child should not be
detained.
‘‘(2) F
AMILY DETENTION
.—The Secretary of
Homeland Security shall—
‘‘(A) maintain the care and custody of an
alien, during the period during which the
charges described in clause (i) are pending,
who—
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.015 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSE H4885 September 29, 2023
‘‘(i) is charged only with a misdemeanor of-
fense under section 275(a) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1325(a)); and
‘‘(ii) entered the United States with the
alien’s child who has not attained 18 years of
age; and
‘‘(B) detain the alien with the alien’s
child.’’.
(b) S
ENSE OF
C
ONGRESS
.—It is the sense of
Congress that the amendments in this sec-
tion to section 235 of the William Wilberforce
Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthoriza-
tion Act of 2008 (8 U.S.C. 1232) are intended to
satisfy the requirements of the Settlement
Agreement in Flores v. Meese, No. 85–4544
(C.D. Cal), as approved by the court on Janu-
ary 28, 1997, with respect to its interpreta-
tion in Flores v. Johnson, 212 F. Supp. 3d 864
(C.D. Cal. 2015), that the agreement applies
to accompanied minors.
(c) E
FFECTIVE
D
ATE
.—The amendment
made by subsection (a) shall take effect on
the date of the enactment of this Act and
shall apply to all actions that occur before,
on, or after such date.
(d) P
REEMPTION OF
S
TATE
L
ICENSING
R
E
-
QUIREMENTS
.—Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, judicial determination, con-
sent decree, or settlement agreement, no
State may require that an immigration de-
tention facility used to detain children who
have not attained 18 years of age, or families
consisting of one or more of such children
and the parents or legal guardians of such
children, that is located in that State, be li-
censed by the State or any political subdivi-
sion thereof.
TITLE V—PROTECTION OF CHILDREN
SEC. 501. FINDINGS.
Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Implementation of the provisions of the
Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthoriza-
tion Act of 2008 that govern unaccompanied
alien children has incentivized multiple
surges of unaccompanied alien children ar-
riving at the southwest border in the years
since the bill’s enactment.
(2) The provisions of the Trafficking Vic-
tims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008
that govern unaccompanied alien children
treat unaccompanied alien children from
countries that are contiguous to the United
States disparately by swiftly returning them
to their home country absent indications of
trafficking or a credible fear of return, but
allowing for the release of unaccompanied
alien children from noncontiguous countries
into the interior of the United States, often
to those individuals who paid to smuggle
them into the country in the first place.
(3) The provisions of the Trafficking Vic-
tims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008
governing unaccompanied alien children
have enriched the cartels, who profit hun-
dreds of millions of dollars each year by
smuggling unaccompanied alien children to
the southwest border, exploiting and sexu-
ally abusing many such unaccompanied alien
children on the perilous journey.
(4) Prior to 2008, the number of unaccom-
panied alien children encountered at the
southwest border never exceeded 1,000 in a
single year.
(5) The United States is currently in the
midst of the worst crisis of unaccompanied
alien children in our nation’s history, with
over 350,000 such unaccompanied alien chil-
dren encountered at the southwest border
since Joe Biden became President.
(6) In 2022, during the Biden Administra-
tion, 152,057 unaccompanied alien children
were encountered, the most ever in a single
year and an over 400 percent increase com-
pared to the last full fiscal year of the
Trump Administration in which 33,239 unac-
companied alien children were encountered.
(7) The Biden Administration has lost con-
tact with at least 85,000 unaccompanied alien
children who entered the United States since
Joe Biden took office.
(8) The Biden Administration dismantled
effective safeguards put in place by the
Trump Administration that protected unac-
companied alien children from being abused
by criminals or exploited for illegal and dan-
gerous child labor.
(9) A recent New York Times investigation
found that unaccompanied alien children are
being exploited in the labor market and ‘‘are
ending up in some of the most punishing jobs
in the country.’’.
(10) The Times investigation found unac-
companied alien children, ‘‘under intense
pressure to earn money’’ in order to ‘‘send
cash back to their families while often being
in debt to their sponsors for smuggling fees,
rent, and living expenses,’’ feared ‘‘that they
had become trapped in circumstances they
never could have imagined.’’.
(11) The Biden Administration’s Depart-
ment of Health and Human Services Sec-
retary Xavier Becerra compared placing un-
accompanied alien children with sponsors, to
widgets in an assembly line, stating that, ‘‘If
Henry Ford had seen this in his plant, he
would have never become famous and rich.
This is not the way you do an assembly
line.’’.
(12) Department of Health and Human
Services employees working under Secretary
Xavier Becerra’s leadership penned a July
2021 memorandum expressing serious concern
that ‘‘labor trafficking was increasing’’ and
that the agency had become ‘‘one that re-
wards individuals for making quick releases,
and not one that rewards individuals for pre-
venting unsafe releases.’’.
(13) Despite this, Secretary Xavier Becerra
pressured then-Director of the Office of Ref-
ugee Resettlement Cindy Huang to prioritize
releases of unaccompanied alien children
over ensuring their safety, telling her ‘‘if she
could not increase the number of discharges
he would find someone who could’’ and then-
Director Huang resigned one month later.
(14) In June 2014, the Obama-Biden Admin-
istration requested legal authority to exer-
cise discretion in returning and removing
unaccompanied alien children from non-con-
tiguous countries back to their home coun-
tries.
(15) In August 2014, the House of Represent-
atives passed H.R. 5320, which included the
Protection of Children Act.
(16) This title ends the disparate policies of
the Trafficking Victims Protection Reau-
thorization Act of 2008 by ensuring the swift
return of all unaccompanied alien children
to their country of origin if they are not vic-
tims of trafficking and do not have a fear of
return.
SEC. 502. REPATRIATION OF UNACCOMPANIED
ALIEN CHILDREN.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—Section 235 of the Wil-
liam Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Pro-
tection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (8 U.S.C.
1232) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) in paragraph (2)—
(i) by amending the heading to read as fol-
lows: ‘‘R
ULES FOR UNACCOMPANIED ALIEN CHIL
-
DREN
.—’’;
(ii) in subparagraph (A)—
(I) in the matter preceding clause (i), by
striking ‘‘who is a national or habitual resi-
dent of a country that is contiguous with the
United States’’;
(II) in clause (i), by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the
end;
(III) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and
inserting a period; and
(IV) by striking clause (iii); and
(iii) in subparagraph (B)—
(I) in the matter preceding clause (i), by
striking ‘‘(8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.) may—’’ and
inserting ‘‘(8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.)—’’;
(II) in clause (i), by inserting before ‘‘per-
mit such child to withdraw’’ the following:
‘‘may’’; and
(III) in clause (ii), by inserting before ‘‘re-
turn such child’’ the following: ‘‘shall’’; and
(B) in paragraph (5)(D)—
(i) in the matter preceding clause (i), by
striking ‘‘, except for an unaccompanied
alien child from a contiguous country sub-
ject to exceptions under subsection (a)(2),’’
and inserting ‘‘who does not meet the cri-
teria listed in paragraph (2)(A)’’; and
(ii) in clause (i), by inserting before the
semicolon at the end the following: ‘‘, which
shall include a hearing before an immigra-
tion judge not later than 14 days after being
screened under paragraph (4)’’;
(2) in subsection (b)—
(A) in paragraph (2)—
(i) in subparagraph (A), by inserting before
the semicolon the following: ‘‘believed not to
meet the criteria listed in subsection
(a)(2)(A)’’; and
(ii) in subparagraph (B), by inserting before
the period the following: ‘‘and does not meet
the criteria listed in subsection (a)(2)(A)’’;
and
(B) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘an unac-
companied alien child in custody shall’’ and
all that follows, and inserting the following:
‘‘an unaccompanied alien child in custody—
‘‘(A) in the case of a child who does not
meet the criteria listed in subsection
(a)(2)(A), shall transfer the custody of such
child to the Secretary of Health and Human
Services not later than 30 days after deter-
mining that such child is an unaccompanied
alien child who does not meet such criteria;
or
‘‘(B) in the case of a child who meets the
criteria listed in subsection (a)(2)(A), may
transfer the custody of such child to the Sec-
retary of Health and Human Services after
determining that such child is an unaccom-
panied alien child who meets such criteria.’’;
and
(3) in subsection (c)—
(A) in paragraph (3), by inserting at the
end the following:
‘‘(D) I
NFORMATION ABOUT INDIVIDUALS WITH
WHOM CHILDREN ARE PLACED
.—
‘‘(i) I
NFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED TO HOME
-
LAND SECURITY
.—Before placing a child with
an individual, the Secretary of Health and
Human Services shall provide to the Sec-
retary of Homeland Security, regarding the
individual with whom the child will be
placed, information on—
‘‘(I) the name of the individual;
‘‘(II) the social security number of the in-
dividual;
‘‘(III) the date of birth of the individual;
‘‘(IV) the location of the individual’s resi-
dence where the child will be placed;
‘‘(V) the immigration status of the indi-
vidual, if known; and
‘‘(VI) contact information for the indi-
vidual.
‘‘(ii) A
CTIVITIES OF THE SECRETARY OF
HOMELAND SECURITY
.—Not later than 30 days
after receiving the information listed in
clause (i), the Secretary of Homeland Secu-
rity, upon determining that an individual
with whom a child is placed is unlawfully
present in the United States and not in re-
moval proceedings pursuant to chapter 4 of
title II of the Immigration and Nationality
Act (8 U.S.C. 1221 et seq.), shall initiate such
removal proceedings.’’; and
(B) in paragraph (5)—
(i) by inserting after ‘‘to the greatest ex-
tent practicable’’ the following: ‘‘(at no ex-
pense to the Government)’’; and
(ii) by striking ‘‘have counsel to represent
them’’ and inserting ‘‘have access to counsel
to represent them’’.
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.015 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSEH4886 September 29, 2023
(b) E
FFECTIVE
D
ATE
.—The amendments
made by this section shall apply to any un-
accompanied alien child (as such term is de-
fined in section 462(g) of the Homeland Secu-
rity Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 279(g))) apprehended
on or after the date that is 30 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 503. SPECIAL IMMIGRANT JUVENILE STATUS
FOR IMMIGRANTS UNABLE TO RE-
UNITE WITH EITHER PARENT.
Section 101(a)(27)(J) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(J))
is amended—
(1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘, and whose
reunification with 1 or both of the immi-
grant’s parents is not viable due to abuse,
neglect, abandonment, or a similar basis
found under State law’’; and
(2) in clause (iii)—
(A) in subclause (I), by striking ‘‘and’’ at
the end;
(B) in subclause (II), by inserting ‘‘and’’
after the semicolon; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(III) an alien may not be granted special
immigrant status under this subparagraph if
the alien’s reunification with any one parent
or legal guardian is not precluded by abuse,
neglect, abandonment, or any similar cause
under State law;’’.
SEC. 504. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.
Nothing in this title shall be construed to
limit the following procedures or practices
relating to an unaccompanied alien child (as
defined in section 462(g)(2) of the Homeland
Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 279(g)(2))):
(1) Screening of such a child for a credible
fear of return to his or her country of origin.
(2) Screening of such a child to determine
whether he or she was a victim of traf-
ficking.
(3) Department of Health and Human Serv-
ices policy in effect on the date of the enact-
ment of this Act requiring a home study for
such a child if he or she is under 12 years of
age.
TITLE VI—VISA OVERSTAYS PENALTIES
SEC. 601. EXPANDED PENALTIES FOR ILLEGAL
ENTRY OR PRESENCE.
Section 275 of the Immigration and Nation-
ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1325) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a) by inserting after ‘‘for
a subsequent commission of any such of-
fense’’ the following: ‘‘or if the alien was pre-
viously convicted of an offense under sub-
section (e)(2)(A)’’;
(2) in subsection (b)—
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘at least
$50 and not more than $250’’ and inserting
‘‘not less than $500 and not more than
$1,000’’; and
(B) in paragraph (2), by inserting after ‘‘in
the case of an alien who has been previously
subject to a civil penalty under this sub-
section’’ the following: ‘‘or subsection
(e)(2)(B)’’; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(e) V
ISA
O
VERSTAYS
.—
‘‘(1) I
N GENERAL
.—An alien who was admit-
ted as a nonimmigrant has violated this
paragraph if the alien, for an aggregate of 10
days or more, has failed—
‘‘(A) to maintain the nonimmigrant status
in which the alien was admitted, or to which
it was changed under section 248, including
complying with the period of stay authorized
by the Secretary of Homeland Security in
connection with such status; or
‘‘(B) to comply otherwise with the condi-
tions of such nonimmigrant status.
‘‘(2) P
ENALTIES
.—An alien who has violated
paragraph (1)—
‘‘(A) shall—
‘‘(i) for the first commission of such a vio-
lation, be fined under title 18, United States
Code, or imprisoned not more than 6 months,
or both; and
‘‘(ii) for a subsequent commission of such a
violation, or if the alien was previously con-
victed of an offense under subsection (a), be
fined under such title 18, or imprisoned not
more than 2 years, or both; and
‘‘(B) in addition to, and not in lieu of, any
penalty under subparagraph (A) and any
other criminal or civil penalties that may be
imposed, shall be subject to a civil penalty
of—
‘‘(i) not less than $500 and not more than
$1,000 for each violation; or
‘‘(ii) twice the amount specified in clause
(i), in the case of an alien who has been pre-
viously subject to a civil penalty under this
subparagraph or subsection (b).’’.
TITLE VII—IMMIGRATION PAROLE
REFORM
SEC. 701. IMMIGRATION PAROLE REFORM.
Section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5)) is
amended to read as follows:
‘‘(5)(A) Except as provided in subpara-
graphs (B) and (C) and section 214(f), the Sec-
retary of Homeland Security, in the discre-
tion of the Secretary, may temporarily pa-
role into the United States any alien apply-
ing for admission to the United States who is
not present in the United States, under such
conditions as the Secretary may prescribe,
on a case-by-case basis, and not according to
eligibility criteria describing an entire class
of potential parole recipients, for urgent hu-
manitarian reasons or significant public ben-
efit. Parole granted under this subparagraph
may not be regarded as an admission of the
alien. When the purposes of such parole have
been served in the opinion of the Secretary,
the alien shall immediately return or be re-
turned to the custody from which the alien
was paroled. After such return, the case of
the alien shall be dealt with in the same
manner as the case of any other applicant
for admission to the United States.
‘‘(B) The Secretary of Homeland Security
may grant parole to any alien who—
‘‘(i) is present in the United States without
lawful immigration status;
‘‘(ii) is the beneficiary of an approved peti-
tion under section 203(a);
‘‘(iii) is not otherwise inadmissible or re-
movable; and
‘‘(iv) is the spouse or child of a member of
the Armed Forces serving on active duty.
‘‘(C) The Secretary of Homeland Security
may grant parole to any alien—
‘‘(i) who is a national of the Republic of
Cuba and is living in the Republic of Cuba;
‘‘(ii) who is the beneficiary of an approved
petition under section 203(a);
‘‘(iii) for whom an immigrant visa is not
immediately available;
‘‘(iv) who meets all eligibility require-
ments for an immigrant visa;
‘‘(v) who is not otherwise inadmissible; and
‘‘(vi) who is receiving a grant of parole in
furtherance of the commitment of the
United States to the minimum level of an-
nual legal migration of Cuban nationals to
the United States specified in the U.S.-Cuba
Joint Communique
´
on Migration, done at
New York September 9, 1994, and reaffirmed
in the Cuba-United States: Joint Statement
on Normalization of Migration, Building on
the Agreement of September 9, 1994, done at
New York May 2, 1995.
‘‘(D) The Secretary of Homeland Security
may grant parole to an alien who is returned
to a contiguous country under section
235(b)(3) to allow the alien to attend the
alien’s immigration hearing. The grant of
parole shall not exceed the time required for
the alien to be escorted to, and attend, the
alien’s immigration hearing scheduled on
the same calendar day as the grant, and to
immediately thereafter be escorted back to
the contiguous country. A grant of parole
under this subparagraph shall not be consid-
ered for purposes of determining whether the
alien is inadmissible under this Act.
‘‘(E) For purposes of determining an alien’s
eligibility for parole under subparagraph (A),
an urgent humanitarian reason shall be lim-
ited to circumstances in which the alien es-
tablishes that—
‘‘(i)(I) the alien has a medical emergency;
and
‘‘(II)(aa) the alien cannot obtain necessary
treatment in the foreign state in which the
alien is residing; or
‘‘(bb) the medical emergency is life-threat-
ening and there is insufficient time for the
alien to be admitted to the United States
through the normal visa process;
‘‘(ii) the alien is the parent or legal guard-
ian of an alien described in clause (i) and the
alien described in clause (i) is a minor;
‘‘(iii) the alien is needed in the United
States in order to donate an organ or other
tissue for transplant and there is insufficient
time for the alien to be admitted to the
United States through the normal visa proc-
ess;
‘‘(iv) the alien has a close family member
in the United States whose death is immi-
nent and the alien could not arrive in the
United States in time to see such family
member alive if the alien were to be admit-
ted to the United States through the normal
visa process;
‘‘(v) the alien is seeking to attend the fu-
neral of a close family member and the alien
could not arrive in the United States in time
to attend such funeral if the alien were to be
admitted to the United States through the
normal visa process;
‘‘(vi) the alien is an adopted child with an
urgent medical condition who is in the legal
custody of the petitioner for a final adop-
tion-related visa and whose medical treat-
ment is required before the expected award
of a final adoption-related visa; or
‘‘(vii) the alien is a lawful applicant for ad-
justment of status under section 245 and is
returning to the United States after tem-
porary travel abroad.
‘‘(F) For purposes of determining an alien’s
eligibility for parole under subparagraph (A),
a significant public benefit may be deter-
mined to result from the parole of an alien
only if—
‘‘(i) the alien has assisted (or will assist,
whether knowingly or not) the United States
Government in a law enforcement matter;
‘‘(ii) the alien’s presence is required by the
Government in furtherance of such law en-
forcement matter; and
‘‘(iii) the alien is inadmissible, does not
satisfy the eligibility requirements for ad-
mission as a nonimmigrant, or there is insuf-
ficient time for the alien to be admitted to
the United States through the normal visa
process.
‘‘(G) For purposes of determining an alien’s
eligibility for parole under subparagraph (A),
the term ‘case-by-case basis’ means that the
facts in each individual case are considered
and parole is not granted based on member-
ship in a defined class of aliens to be granted
parole. The fact that aliens are considered
for or granted parole one-by-one and not as
a group is not sufficient to establish that the
parole decision is made on a ‘case-by-case
basis’.
‘‘(H) The Secretary of Homeland Security
may not use the parole authority under this
paragraph to parole an alien into the United
States for any reason or purpose other than
those described in subparagraphs (B), (C),
(D), (E), and (F).
‘‘(I) An alien granted parole may not ac-
cept employment, except that an alien
granted parole pursuant to subparagraph (B)
or (C) is authorized to accept employment
for the duration of the parole, as evidenced
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.015 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSE H4887 September 29, 2023
by an employment authorization document
issued by the Secretary of Homeland Secu-
rity.
‘‘(J) Parole granted after a departure from
the United States shall not be regarded as an
admission of the alien. An alien granted pa-
role, whether as an initial grant of parole or
parole upon reentry into the United States,
is not eligible to adjust status to lawful per-
manent residence or for any other immigra-
tion benefit if the immigration status the
alien had at the time of departure did not
authorize the alien to adjust status or to be
eligible for such benefit.
‘‘(K)(i) Except as provided in clauses (ii)
and (iii), parole shall be granted to an alien
under this paragraph for the shorter of—
‘‘(I) a period of sufficient length to accom-
plish the activity described in subparagraph
(D), (E), or (F) for which the alien was grant-
ed parole; or
‘‘(II) 1 year.
‘‘(ii) Grants of parole pursuant to subpara-
graph (A) may be extended once, in the dis-
cretion of the Secretary, for an additional
period that is the shorter of—
‘‘(I) the period that is necessary to accom-
plish the activity described in subparagraph
(E) or (F) for which the alien was granted pa-
role; or
‘‘(II) 1 year.
‘‘(iii) Aliens who have a pending applica-
tion to adjust status to permanent residence
under section 245 may request extensions of
parole under this paragraph, in 1-year incre-
ments, until the application for adjustment
has been adjudicated. Such parole shall ter-
minate immediately upon the denial of such
adjustment application.
‘‘(L) Not later than 90 days after the last
day of each fiscal year, the Secretary of
Homeland Security shall submit to the Com-
mittee on the Judiciary of the Senate and
the Committee on the Judiciary of the House
of Representatives and make available to the
public, a report—
‘‘(i) identifying the total number of aliens
paroled into the United States under this
paragraph during the previous fiscal year;
and
‘‘(ii) containing information and data re-
garding all aliens paroled during such fiscal
year, including—
‘‘(I) the duration of parole;
‘‘(II) the type of parole; and
‘‘(III) the current status of the aliens so
paroled.’’.
SEC. 702. IMPLEMENTATION.
(a) I
N
G
ENERAL
.—Except as provided in
subsection (b), this title and the amend-
ments made by this title shall take effect on
the date that is 30 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act.
(b) E
XCEPTIONS
.—Notwithstanding sub-
section (a), each of the following exceptions
apply:
(1) Any application for parole or advance
parole filed by an alien before the date of the
enactment of this Act shall be adjudicated
under the law that was in effect on the date
on which the application was properly filed
and any approved advance parole shall re-
main valid under the law that was in effect
on the date on which the advance parole was
approved.
(2) Section 212(d)(5)(J) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act, as added by section 701
of this title, shall take effect on the date of
the enactment of this Act.
(3) Aliens who were paroled into the United
States pursuant to section 212(d)(5)(A) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.
1182(d)(5)(A)) before January 1, 2023, shall
continue to be subject to the terms of parole
that were in effect on the date on which
their respective parole was approved.
SEC. 703. CAUSE OF ACTION.
Any person, State, or local government
that experiences financial harm in excess of
$1,000 due to a failure of the Federal Govern-
ment to lawfully apply the provisions of this
title or the amendments made by this title
shall have standing to bring a civil action
against the Federal Government in an appro-
priate district court of the United States for
appropriate relief.
SEC. 704. SEVERABILITY.
If any provision of this title or any amend-
ment by this title, or the application of such
provision or amendment to any person or
circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional,
the remainder of this title and the applica-
tion of such provision or amendment to any
other person or circumstance shall not be af-
fected.
DIVISION E—FISCAL COMMISSION ACT OF
2023
SEC. 801. SHORT TITLE.
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Fiscal
Commission Act of 2023’’.
SEC. 802. DEFINITIONS.
In this division:
(1) C
O
-
CHAIR
.—The term ‘‘co-chair’’ means
an individual appointed to serve as a co-
chair of the Fiscal Commission under section
803(a)(3)(C)(i).
(2) F
ISCAL COMMISSION
.—The term ‘‘Fiscal
Commission’’ means the commission estab-
lished under section 803(a).
(3) F
ISCAL COMMISSION BILL
.—The term
‘‘Fiscal Commission bill’’ means a bill con-
sisting solely of legislative language that the
Fiscal Commission approves and submits
under clauses (i) and (v), respectively, of sec-
tion 803(a)(2)(B).
(4) O
UTSIDE EXPERT
.—The term ‘‘outside
expert’’ is an individual who is not an elect-
ed official or an officer or employee of the
Federal Government or of any State.
SEC. 803. ESTABLISHMENT OF FISCAL COMMIS-
SION.
(a) E
STABLISHMENT OF
F
ISCAL
C
OMMIS
-
SION
.—
(1) E
STABLISHMENT
.—No later than 60 days
after the date of enactment of this Act, there
is established in Congress a Fiscal Commis-
sion.
(2) D
UTIES
.—
(A) I
MPROVE FISCAL SITUATION
.—
(i) I
N GENERAL
.—The Fiscal Commission
shall identify policies to improve the fiscal
situation in the medium term and to achieve
a sustainable debt-to-GDP ratio of the long
term, and for any recommendations related
to Federal programs for which a Federal
trust fund exists, to improve solvency for a
period of at least 75 years.
(ii) R
EQUIREMENTS
.—In carrying out clause
(i), the Fiscal Commission shall—
(I) propose recommendations designed to
balance the budget at the earliest reasonable
date, including at minimum stabilizing the
debt-to-GDP ratio at or below one hundred
percent by the end of the 10-year period be-
ginning on the date the Fiscal Commission is
established; and
(II) propose recommendations that mean-
ingfully improve the long-term fiscal out-
look, including changes to address the
growth of direct spending and the gap be-
tween the projected revenues and expendi-
tures of the Federal Government.
(iii) R
ECOMMENDATIONS OF COMMITTEES
.—
Not later than 60 days after the date de-
scribed in paragraph (1), each committee of
the Senate and the House of Representatives
may transmit to the Fiscal Commission any
recommendations of the committee relating
to changes in law to further the duties de-
scribed in clause (ii).
(B) R
EPORT
,
RECOMMENDATIONS
,
AND LEGIS
-
LATIVE LANGUAGE
.—
(i) I
N GENERAL
.—Notwithstanding para-
graph (4)(D)(ii)(II), not earlier than Novem-
ber 6, 2024, but not later than November 15,
2024, the Fiscal Commission shall meet to
consider, and vote on—
(I) a report that contains a detailed state-
ment of the findings, conclusions, and rec-
ommendations of the Fiscal Commission de-
scribed in subparagraph (A)(i) and the esti-
mate of the Congressional Budget Office re-
quired under paragraph (4)(D)(ii); and
(II) legislative language to carry out the
recommendations of the Fiscal Commission
in the report described in subclause (I),
which shall include a statement of the eco-
nomic and budgetary effects of the rec-
ommendations.
(ii) A
PPROVAL OF REPORT AND LEGISLATIVE
LANGUAGE
.—A report and legislative lan-
guage of the Fiscal Commission under clause
(i) shall require the approval of a majority of
the members of the Fiscal Commission, pro-
vided that such majority shall be required to
include not less than 3 members of the Fiscal
Commission appointed by members of the
Republican Party and 3 members appointed
by members of the Democratic party.
(iii) A
DDITIONAL VIEWS
.—
(I) I
N GENERAL
.—A member of the Fiscal
Commission who gives notice of an intention
to file supplemental, minority, or additional
views at the time of the final Fiscal Commis-
sion vote on the approval of the report and
legislative language of the Fiscal Commis-
sion under clause (i) shall be entitled to 3
days to file those views in writing with the
staff director of the Fiscal Commission.
(II) I
NCLUSION IN REPORT
.—Views filed
under subclause (I) shall be included in the
report of the Fiscal Commission under clause
(i) and printed in the same volume, or part
thereof, and such inclusion shall be noted on
the cover of the report, except that, in the
absence of timely notice, the report may be
printed and transmitted immediately with-
out such views.
(iv) R
EPORT AND LEGISLATIVE LANGUAGE TO
BE MADE PUBLIC
.—Upon the approval or dis-
approval of a report and legislative language
under clause (i) by the Fiscal Commission,
the Fiscal Commission shall promptly, and
not more than 24 hours after the approval or
disapproval or, if timely notice is given
under clause (iii), not more than 24 hours
after additional views are filed under such
clause, make the report, the legislative lan-
guage, and a record of the vote on the report
and legislative language available to the
public.
(v) S
UBMISSION OF REPORT AND LEGISLATIVE
LANGUAGE
.—If a report and legislative lan-
guage are approved by the Fiscal Commis-
sion under clause (i), not later than 3 days
after the date on which the report and legis-
lative language are made available to the
public under clause (iv), the Fiscal Commis-
sion shall submit the report and legislative
language to the President, the Vice Presi-
dent, the Speaker of the House of Represent-
atives, and the majority and minority lead-
ers of each House of Congress.
(3) M
EMBERSHIP
.—
(A) I
N GENERAL
.—The Fiscal Commission
shall be composed of 16 members appointed
in accordance with subparagraph (B) and
with due consideration to chairs and ranking
members of the committees and subcommit-
tees of subject matter jurisdiction, if appli-
cable.
(B) A
PPOINTMENT
.—Not later than 14 days
after the date described in paragraph (1)—
(i) the majority leader of the Senate shall
appoint 3 individuals from among the Mem-
bers of the Senate, and 1 outside expert, who
shall serve as members of the Fiscal Com-
mission;
(ii) the minority leader of the Senate shall
appoint 3 individuals from among the Mem-
bers of the Senate, and 1 outside expert who
shall serve as members of the Fiscal Com-
mission;
(iii) the Speaker of the House of Represent-
atives shall appoint 3 individuals from
VerDate Sep 11 2014 07:13 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.015 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSEH4888 September 29, 2023
among the Members of the House of Rep-
resentatives, and 1 outside expert, who shall
serve as members of the Fiscal Commission;
and
(iv) the minority leader of the House of
Representatives shall appoint 3 individuals
from among the Members of the House of
Representatives, and 1 outside expert, who
shall serve as members of the Fiscal Com-
mission.
(C) C
O
-
CHAIRS
.—
(i) I
N GENERAL
.—Not later than 14 days
after the date described in paragraph (1),
with respect to the Fiscal Commission—
(I) the leadership of the Senate and House
of Representatives of the same political
party as the President shall appoint 1 indi-
vidual from among the members of the Fis-
cal Commission who shall serve as a co-chair
of the Fiscal Commission; and
(II) the leadership of the Senate and House
of Representatives of the opposite political
party as the President, shall appoint 1 indi-
vidual from among the members of the Fis-
cal Commission who shall serve as a co-chair
of the Fiscal Commission.
(ii) S
TAFF DIRECTOR
.—With respect to the
Fiscal Commission, the co-chairs of the Fis-
cal Commission, acting jointly, shall hire
the staff director of the Fiscal Commission.
(D) P
ERIOD OF APPOINTMENT
.—
(i) I
N GENERAL
.—The members of the Fiscal
Commission shall be appointed for the life of
the Fiscal Commission.
(ii) V
ACANCY
.—
(I) I
N GENERAL
.—Any vacancy in the Fiscal
Commission shall not affect the powers of
the Fiscal Commission, but shall be filled
not later than 14 days after the date on
which the vacancy occurs, in the same man-
ner as the original appointment was made.
(II) I
NELIGIBLE MEMBERS
.—If a member of
the Fiscal Commission who was appointed as
a Member of the Senate or the House Rep-
resentatives ceases to be a Member of the
Senate or the House of Representatives, as
applicable—
(aa) the member shall no longer be a mem-
ber of the Fiscal Commission; and
(bb) a vacancy in the Fiscal Commission
exists.
(4) A
DMINISTRATION
.—
(A) I
N GENERAL
.—With respect to the Fis-
cal Commission, to enable the Fiscal Com-
mission to exercise the powers, functions,
and duties of the Fiscal Commission, there
are authorized to be disbursed by the Senate
the actual and necessary expenses of the Fis-
cal Commission approved by the co-chairs of
the Fiscal Commission, subject to the rules
and regulations of the Senate.
(B) E
XPENSES
.—With respect to the Fiscal
Commission, in carrying out the functions of
the Fiscal Commission, the Fiscal Commis-
sion is authorized to incur expenses in the
same manner and under the same conditions
as the Joint Economic Committee is author-
ized under section 11(d) of the Employment
Act of 1946 (15 U.S.C. 1024(d)).
(C) Q
UORUM
.—With respect to the Fiscal
Commission, 9 members of the Fiscal Com-
mission shall constitute a quorum for pur-
poses of voting, meeting, and holding hear-
ings.
(D) V
OTING
.—
(i) P
ROXY VOTING
.—No proxy voting shall
be allowed on behalf of any member of the
Fiscal Commission.
(ii) C
ONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE ESTI
-
MATES
.—
(I) I
N GENERAL
.—The Director of the Con-
gressional Budget Office shall, with respect
to the legislative language of the Fiscal
Commission under paragraph (2)(B)(i)(II),
provide to the Fiscal Commission—
(aa) estimates of the legislative language
in accordance with sections 308(a) and 201(f)
of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2
U.S.C. 639(a) and 601(f)); and
(bb) information on the budgetary effect of
the legislative language on the long-term fis-
cal outlook.
(II) L
IMITATION
.—The Fiscal Commission
may not vote on any version of the report,
recommendations, or legislative language of
the Fiscal Commission under paragraph
(2)(B)(i) unless the estimates and informa-
tion described in subclause (I) of this clause
are made available for consideration by all
members of the Fiscal Commission not later
than 48 hours before that vote, as certified
by the co-chairs of the Fiscal Commission.
(E) M
EETINGS
.—
(i) I
NITIAL MEETING
.—Not later than 45 days
after the date described in paragraph (1), the
Fiscal Commission shall hold the first meet-
ing of the Fiscal Commission.
(ii) A
GENDA
.—For each meeting of the Fis-
cal Commission, the co-chairs of the Fiscal
Commission shall provide an agenda to the
members of the Fiscal Commission not later
than 48 hours before the meeting.
(F) H
EARINGS
.—
(i) I
N GENERAL
.—The Fiscal Commission
may, for the purpose of carrying out this sec-
tion, hold such hearings, sit and act at such
times and places, require attendance of wit-
nesses and production of books, papers, and
documents, take such testimony, receive
such evidence, and administer such oaths as
the Fiscal Commission considers advisable.
(ii) H
EARING PROCEDURES AND RESPONSIBIL
-
ITIES OF CO
-
CHAIRS
.—
(I) A
NNOUNCEMENT
.—The co-chairs of the
Fiscal Commission shall make a public an-
nouncement of the date, place, time, and
subject matter of any hearing to be con-
ducted under this subparagraph not later
than 7 days before the date of the hearing,
unless the co-chairs determine that there is
good cause to begin such hearing on an ear-
lier date.
(II) W
RITTEN STATEMENT
.—A witness ap-
pearing before the Fiscal Commission shall
file a written statement of the proposed tes-
timony of the witness not later than 2 days
before the date of the appearance of the wit-
ness, unless the co-chairs of the Fiscal Com-
mission—
(aa) determine that there is good cause for
the witness to not file the written state-
ment; and
(bb) waive the requirement that the wit-
ness file the written statement.
(G) T
ECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
.—Upon written
request of the co-chairs of the Fiscal Com-
mission, the head of a Federal agency shall
provide technical assistance to the Fiscal
Commission in order for the Fiscal Commis-
sion to carry out the duties of the Fiscal
Commission.
(H) O
UTSIDE
E
XPERT
.—Any outside expert
appointed to the Fiscal Commission—
(i) shall not be considered to be a Federal
employee for any purpose by reason of serv-
ice on the Fiscal Commission; and
(ii) shall be allowed travel expenses, in-
cluding per diem in lieu of subsistence, at
rates authorized for employees of agencies
under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5,
United States Code, while away from their
homes or regular places of business in the
performance of services for the Commission.
(b) S
TAFF OF
F
ISCAL
C
OMMISSION
.—
(1) I
N GENERAL
.—The co-chairs of the Fis-
cal Commission may jointly appoint and fix
the compensation of staff of the Fiscal Com-
mission as the co-chairs determine nec-
essary, in accordance with the guidelines,
rules, and requirements relating to employ-
ees of the Senate.
(2) E
THICAL STANDARDS
.—
(A) S
ENATE
.—Members appointed by Mem-
bers of the Senate who serve on the Fiscal
Commission and staff of the Fiscal Commis-
sion shall adhere to the ethics rules of the
Senate.
(B) H
OUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
.—Members
appointed by Members of the House of Rep-
resentatives who serve on the Fiscal Com-
mission shall be governed by the ethics rules
and requirements of the House of Represent-
atives.
(c) T
ERMINATION
.—The Fiscal Commission
shall terminate on the date that is 30 days
after the date the Fiscal Commission sub-
mits the report under subsection (a)(2)(B)(v).
SEC. 804. EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION
OF FISCAL COMMISSION BILLS.
(a) Q
UALIFYING
L
EGISLATION
.—Only a Fis-
cal Commission bill shall be entitled to expe-
dited consideration under this section.
(b) C
ONSIDERATION IN THE
H
OUSE OF
R
EP
-
RESENTATIVES
.—
(1) I
NTRODUCTION
.—If the Fiscal Commis-
sion approves and submits legislative lan-
guage under clauses (i) and (v), respectively,
of section 803(a)(2)(B), the Fiscal Commission
bill consisting solely of that legislative lan-
guage shall be introduced in the House of
Representatives (by request)—
(A) by the majority leader of the House of
Representatives, or by a Member of the
House of Representatives designated by the
majority leader of the House of Representa-
tives, on the third legislative day after the
date the Fiscal Commission approves and
submits such legislative language; or
(B) if the Fiscal Commission bill is not in-
troduced under subparagraph (A), by any
Member of the House of Representatives on
any legislative day beginning on the legisla-
tive day after the legislative day described
in subparagraph (A).
(2) R
EFERRAL AND REPORTING
.—Any com-
mittee of the House of Representatives to
which a Fiscal Commission bill is referred
shall report the Fiscal Commission bill to
the House of Representatives without
amendment not later than 5 legislative days
after the date on which the Fiscal Commis-
sion bill was so referred. If any committee of
the House of Representatives to which a Fis-
cal Commission bill is referred fails to report
the Fiscal Commission bill within that pe-
riod, that committee shall be automatically
discharged from consideration of the Fiscal
Commission bill, and the Fiscal Commission
bill shall be placed on the appropriate cal-
endar.
(3) P
ROCEEDING TO CONSIDERATION
.—After
the last committee authorized to consider a
Fiscal Commission bill reports it to the
House of Representatives or has been dis-
charged from its consideration, it shall be in
order to move to proceed to consider the Fis-
cal Commission bill in the House of Rep-
resentatives. Such a motion shall not be in
order after the House of Representatives has
disposed of a motion to proceed with respect
to the Fiscal Commission bill. The previous
question shall be considered as ordered on
the motion to its adoption without inter-
vening motion.
(4) C
ONSIDERATION
.—The Fiscal Commis-
sion bill shall be considered as read. All
points of order against the Fiscal Commis-
sion bill and against its consideration are
waived. The previous question shall be con-
sidered as ordered on the Fiscal Commission
bill to its passage without intervening mo-
tion except 2 hours of debate equally divided
and controlled by the proponent and an op-
ponent.
(5) V
OTE ON PASSAGE
.—The vote on passage
of the Fiscal Commission bill shall occur
pursuant to the constraints under clause 8 of
rule XX of the Rules of the House of Rep-
resentatives.
(c) E
XPEDITED
P
ROCEDURE IN THE
S
ENATE
.—
(1) I
NTRODUCTION IN THE SENATE
.—If the
Fiscal Commission approves and submits
legislative language under clauses (i) and (v),
respectively, of section 803(a)(2)(B), a Fiscal
Commission bill consisting solely of that
VerDate Sep 11 2014 07:13 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.018 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSE H4889 September 29, 2023
legislative language may be introduced in
the senate (by request)—
(A) by the majority leader of the Senate,
or by a Member of the Senate designated by
the majority leader of the Senate, on the
next day on which the Senate is in session;
or
(B) if the Fiscal Commission bill is not in-
troduced under subparagraph (A), by any
Member of the Senate on any day on which
the Senate is in session beginning on the day
after the day described in subparagraph (A).
(2) C
OMMITTEE CONSIDERATION
.—A Fiscal
Commission bill introduced in the Senate
under paragraph (1) shall be jointly referred
to the committee or committees of jurisdic-
tion, which committees shall report the Fis-
cal Commission bill without any revision
and with a favorable recommendation, an
unfavorable recommendation, or without
recommendation, not later than 5 session
days after the date on which the Fiscal Com-
mission bill was so referred. If any com-
mittee to which a Fiscal Commission bill is
referred fails to report the Fiscal Commis-
sion bill within that period, that committee
shall be automatically discharged from con-
sideration of the Fiscal Commission bill, and
the Fiscal Commission bill shall be placed on
the appropriate calendar.
(3) P
ROCEEDING
.—Notwithstanding rule
XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate, it
is in order, not later than 2 days of session
after the date on which a Fiscal Commission
bill is reported or discharged from all com-
mittees to which the Fiscal Commission bill
was referred, for the majority leader of the
Senate or the designee of the majority leader
to move to proceed to the consideration of
the Fiscal Commission bill. It shall also be
in order for any Member of the Senate to
move to proceed to the consideration of the
Fiscal Commission bill at any time after the
conclusion of such 2-day period. A motion to
proceed is in order even though a previous
motion to the same effect has been disagreed
to. All points of order against the motion to
proceed to the Fiscal Commission bill are
waived. The motion to proceed is not debat-
able. The motion is not subject to a motion
to postpone. A motion to reconsider the vote
by which the motion is agreed to or dis-
agreed to shall not be in order. If a motion
to proceed to the consideration of the Fiscal
Commission bill is agreed to, the Fiscal
Commission bill shall remain the unfinished
business until disposed of. All points of order
against a Fiscal Commission bill and against
consideration of the Fiscal Commission bill
are waived.
(4) N
O AMENDMENTS
.—An amendment to a
Fiscal Commission bill, or a motion to post-
pone, or a motion to proceed to the consider-
ation of other business, or a motion to re-
commit the Fiscal Commission bill, is not in
order.
(5) R
ULINGS OF THE CHAIR ON PROCEDURE
.—
Appeals from the decisions of the Chair re-
lating to the application of the rules of the
Senate, as the case may be, to the procedure
relating to a Fiscal Commission bill shall be
decided without debate.
(d) A
MENDMENT
.—A Fiscal Commission bill
shall not be subject to amendment in either
the Senate or the House of Representatives.
(e) C
ONSIDERATION BY THE
O
THER
H
OUSE
.—
(1) I
N GENERAL
.—If, before passing a Fiscal
Commission bill, a House receives from the
other House a Fiscal Commission bill con-
sisting of legislative language approved by
the same Fiscal Commission as the Fiscal
Commission bill in the receiving House—
(A) the Fiscal Commission bill of the other
House shall not be referred to a committee;
and
(B) the procedure in the receiving House
shall be the same as if no Fiscal Commission
bill had been received from the other House
until the vote on passage, when the Fiscal
Commission bill received from the other
House shall supplant the Fiscal Commission
bill of the receiving House.
(2) R
EVENUE MEASURES
.—This subsection
shall not apply to the House of Representa-
tives if a Fiscal Commission bill received
from the Senate is a revenue measure.
(f) R
ULES
T
O
C
OORDINATE
A
CTION
W
ITH
O
THER
H
OUSE
.—
(1) T
REATMENT OF FISCAL COMMISSION BILL
OF OTHER HOUSE
.—If a Fiscal Commission bill
is not introduced in the Senate or the Senate
fails to consider a Fiscal Commission bill
under this section, the Fiscal Commission
bill of the House of Representatives con-
sisting of legislative language approved by
the same Fiscal Commission as the Fiscal
Commission bill in the Senate shall be enti-
tled to expedited floor procedures under this
section.
(2) T
REATMENT OF COMPANION MEASURES IN
THE SENATE
.—If, following passage of a Fis-
cal Commission bill in the Senate, the Sen-
ate then receives from the House of Rep-
resentatives a Fiscal Commission bill ap-
proved by the same Fiscal Commission and
consisting of the same legislative language
as the Senate-passed Fiscal Commission bill,
the House-passed Fiscal Commission bill
shall not be debatable. The vote on passage
of the Fiscal Commission bill in the Senate
shall be considered to be the vote on passage
of the Fiscal Commission bill received from
the House of Representatives.
(3) V
ETOES
.—If the President vetoes a Fis-
cal Commission bill, consideration of a veto
message in the Senate under this paragraph
shall be 10 hours equally divided between the
majority and minority leaders of the Senate
or the designees of the majority and minor-
ity leaders of the Senate.
SEC. 805. FUNDING.
Funding for the Fiscal Commission shall
be derived in equal portions from—
(1) the contingent fund of the Senate from
the appropriations account ‘‘Miscellaneous
Items’’, subject to the rules and regulations
of the Senate; and
(2) the applicable accounts of the House of
Representatives.
SEC. 806. RULEMAKING.
The provisions of this division are enacted
by Congress—
(1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power
of the Senate and the House of Representa-
tives, respectively, and, as such, the provi-
sions—
(A) shall be considered as part of the rules
of each House, respectively, or of that House
to which they specifically apply; and
(B) shall supersede other rules only to the
extent that they are inconsistent therewith;
and
(2) with full recognition of the constitu-
tional right of either House to change such
rules (so far as relating to such House) at
any time, in the same manner, and to the
same extent as in the case of any other rule
of such House.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The bill
shall be debatable for 1 hour equally di-
vided and controlled by the chair and
ranking minority member of the Com-
mittee on Appropriations or their re-
spective designees.
The gentleman from Florida (Mr.
D
IAZ
-B
ALART
) and the gentlewoman
from Connecticut (Ms. D
E
L
AURO
) each
will control 30 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman
from Florida.
GENERAL LEAVE
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker, I
ask unanimous consent that all Mem-
bers may have 5 legislative days in
which to revise and extend their re-
marks and include extraneous material
on the measure under consideration.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there
objection to the request of the gen-
tleman from Florida?
There was no objection.
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker, I
yield myself such time as I may con-
sume.
Mr. Speaker, I am proud to speak on
the Spending Reduction and Border Se-
curity Act of 2024.
As we all know, the most basic duty
that Congress has and must complete
every year is that constitutional power
of Congress to fund the Federal Gov-
ernment. This bill, Mr. Speaker, will
provide funding to keep our govern-
ment open until October 31. Unless we
act now, the government will shut
down at midnight on Saturday.
Let’s be very clear, Mr. Speaker. The
House has already passed four appro-
priations bills, which constitute the
majority of funding for our govern-
ment. Now, unfortunately, the Senate
continues to sit on its hands and has
failed to pass any of them, any of them
thus far. Unfortunately, it is some-
thing that we have seen time and time
again from our friends across this
building.
Mr. Speaker, the country is nearly
$32.9 trillion in debt—that is trillion
with a t, Mr. Speaker—and our deficit
this year is $1.9 trillion. The Biden ad-
ministration has gone on a crazy, irre-
sponsible spending binge with money
that we do not have to spend, money
that is borrowed mostly from Com-
munist China. It is time. It is time. It
is time that we slow this out-of-con-
trol, unsustainable spending to a level
that is sustainable.
Yesterday, Mr. Speaker, I was proud
that the House of Representatives
passed the State and Foreign Oper-
ations appropriations bill, one that I
was pleased and honored to lead that
cut wasteful spending while making
crucial investments in our national se-
curity, all while the total cost of that
bill passed last night is way below fis-
cal year 2015 spending levels. That bill
that we passed will slow our spending
by really taking discretionary spending
back to fiscal year 2022 overall.
Now, excluded from those reductions
in this bill are any reductions from de-
fense, veterans, homeland security, and
disaster relief. It is a very important
start and well overdue to fund our pri-
orities, the American people’s prior-
ities, but doing so in a responsible way
that does not bankrupt the American
taxpayer.
Mr. Speaker, in addition, this bill
provides flexibility to the Department
of Defense for new starts, but this bill
does more than just deal with our out-
of-control spending, which it must. It
will also help the just inhumane tide at
our southern border.
Mr. Speaker, our southern border is
out of control. The Biden administra-
tion has failed to even do the bare min-
imum to secure our border. As I have
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.020 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSEH4890 September 29, 2023
said before, Mr. Speaker, the irrespon-
sible attitude of the Biden administra-
tion when it comes to the southern
border is beyond negligence and incom-
petence. It also has fatal consequences.
In just the last few days, we have
seen a surge at the border with an av-
erage of over 9,000 apprehensions each
and every day. This is unsustainable. It
is unthinkable, and I would add it is
immoral.
Mr. Speaker, our border is out of con-
trol. Actually, no, let me correct my-
self right here on the floor of the
House, Mr. Speaker. No, it is controlled
now 100 percent by the narco-terrorist
cartels on the Mexican side of the bor-
der. That is who the administration
has ceded control of the southern bor-
der to. This crisis is only going to con-
tinue to get worse and worse unless we
act.
b 1215
Earlier this year, the House approved
the bill that I was honored to lead,
H.R. 2, the Border Security Act of 2023.
As you know, Mr. Speaker, this bill
would make changes to our immigra-
tion policies that would help reclaim
control of the southern border.
I am proud to say that the Spending
Reduction and Border Security Act of
2024, which I am speaking about today,
includes the Border Security Act of
2023 already passed by this House.
This bill provides a solution. This bill
that we are discussing now provides a
solution to keep the government open.
This bill keeps the government open
and restrains the growth of govern-
ment while giving us an opportunity to
continue negotiations on the appro-
priations bills.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to
do the responsible thing. Support this
bill so that we can send it to the Sen-
ate and keep the Federal Government
open. That is what we are dealing with.
That is what the vote is about.
Mr. Speaker, I urge all of my col-
leagues to do the right thing and vote
‘‘yes’’ on this bill, and I reserve the
balance of my time.
Ms. D
E
LAURO. Mr. Speaker, I yield
myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I rise to oppose this
continuing resolution. If you cannot
agree to the funding levels for 2024 in
order to keep government open, you
must pass a continuing resolution. A 30
percent slashing of the Federal Govern-
ment only continues the majority’s in-
ability and unwillingness to govern re-
sponsibly.
I would argue that you cannot call it
a conservative resolution, either. There
is nothing conservative about the in-
discriminate destruction of public in-
vestments in America’s families.
Regardless of what it is called, this
bill inflicts serious consequences on
the American people, whether it is
signed into law, which it never will be,
or because of the costly shutdown it
triggers.
We are less than 48 hours from a gov-
ernment shutdown, and what do we
have to show for it?
The American people are tired of the
doublespeak coming from the majority.
There are House Republicans who have
repeatedly assured the public that no-
body wants a shutdown, and there are
others who tell us they think a shut-
down would be a good thing for the
country. Maybe they are not worried
about a shutdown because they know
that Members of Congress will not miss
a paycheck.
I can speak for every Democrat in
the Congress when I say we oppose this
Republican shutdown, a shutdown that
will be devastating for our country.
What have the Republicans offered as
their effort to avoid a government
shutdown? What would this bill do?
This bill would slash investments in
cancer research, leave communities re-
covering from natural disasters out to
dry, and undercut allies with a $1 bil-
lion cut to Israel and further cuts to
our support of Ukraine. It defunds law
enforcement by 30 percent and makes
our communities less safe. It takes
food out of the mouths of millions.
This bill raises costs for American
families at a time when the cost of liv-
ing is already too high.
It cuts title I education funding, the
bedrock of American public education,
to the effect of 150,000 teachers being
pulled out of classrooms. Mr. Speaker,
275,000 children would lose access to
Head Start, undermining early edu-
cation and making it harder for par-
ents to work.
In an unprecedented move, the House
Republican bill cuts the Low-Income
Home Energy Assistance Program,
LIHEAP, funding by roughly 74 per-
cent. More than 5 million households
will lose their home heating or cooling
benefits or have their benefits cut by
hundreds of dollars, threatening their
ability to heat their homes in winter or
cool their homes in summer.
House Republicans are threatening
public health by cutting the Food Safe-
ty and Inspection Service by 30 per-
cent. Without adequate inspection staff
in our meat and poultry plants, these
plants will be required to close or re-
duce their hours. It hurts workers’ pay-
checks, reduces the meat and poultry
supply, raises the cost of food for
American families, and risks the con-
sumption of contaminated food.
With the cuts in this bill, 400,000
fewer small businesses would be as-
sisted by the Small Business Adminis-
tration’s entrepreneurial development
programs. This would have a signifi-
cant impact on small business owners,
especially among veterans, women, and
Native American entrepreneurs.
This bill has no future. At best, it is
dead on arrival in the Senate and
would never be signed by the President
of the United States.
Everyone in this room knows that
keeping the government operating and
passing bills to fully fund the next fis-
cal year will require bipartisan co-
operation. You need the House and the
Senate, Democrats and Republicans, to
pass appropriations bills. Yet, House
Republicans are refusing to work with
and negotiate with Democrats.
This is a pointless charade with
grave consequences for the American
people. House Democrats are ready to
work. We were ready in the spring. We
were ready last week. We are ready
this weekend. We are ready today, to-
morrow, and every day to work in good
faith with our colleagues on the other
side of the aisle to meet the needs of
the American people.
Let’s get to work, serious work.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of
my time.
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker,
let’s be very clear. We are going to
know shortly who wants to shut down
the government and who wants to keep
it open because we are going to have a
vote. In front of us today is this resolu-
tion to keep the government open. I
know there is going to be a lot of talk,
but we are going to have a vote. If you
vote for this resolution, it keeps the
government open, and if you vote
against it, government shuts down Sat-
urday night.
That is not too complicated. The
American people are smart. They get
that. Out of all the talk we are going
to hear, we will know on that vote. If
you vote for this resolution, you are
voting to keep the government open. If
you vote against it, well, you are vot-
ing to shut it down.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentleman from Arkansas (Mr.
W
ESTERMAN
), the distinguished chair-
man of the Committee on Natural Re-
sources.
Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, we
have all heard that life is about mak-
ing choices. Serving in Congress re-
quires making big choices on a big
stage that are forever chronicled in our
votes. Take out all the rhetoric and all
the policy disagreements and, at the
end of this debate, every Member of the
House will have a choice to make and
a vote to cast.
Making choices is about setting pri-
orities. House Republicans have made
it clear that cutting spending, securing
the border, and keeping the govern-
ment open while we finish the yearlong
spending bills are our priorities.
It is no secret, based on previous ac-
tions, that my friends across the aisle
prioritize out-of-control spending and
an open border. I anticipate their prior-
ities will outweigh their desire to keep
the government open. That is their
choice.
Since President Biden took office,
our debt has skyrocketed, inflation is
strangling our citizens, and thousands
of pounds of fentanyl and millions of il-
legal immigrants, including more than
150 on the terrorist watch list, have
poured over our southern border and
into our communities. This immigra-
tion crisis is so bad that the Biden ad-
ministration has resorted to building
migrant shelters in our national parks
and waiving environmental laws to do
it.
This has to stop. The choices are
clear. The conservative solution will
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\K29SE7.026 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSE H4891 September 29, 2023
avoid a government shutdown, secure
our borders, and keep us on track to re-
store fiscal sanity. Let me be clear
that a vote against this bill is a vote to
continue down the path of out-of-con-
trol spending, to keep our borders
open, and to shut down the govern-
ment.
Mr. Speaker, I have made my choice
to vote ‘‘yes,’’ and I encourage others
to do the same.
Ms. D
E
LAURO. Mr. Speaker, I will
just take a second to tell the gen-
tleman from Arkansas that, with this
bill, you will cut 1,460 teachers from
your district and almost 46,000 house-
holds will have their low-income en-
ergy assistance benefits terminated.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentlewoman from Florida (Ms.
W
ASSERMAN
S
CHULTZ
), the distin-
guished ranking member of the Mili-
tary Construction, Veterans Affairs,
and Related Agencies Subcommittee.
Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ. Mr.
Speaker, I rise in opposition to this so-
called CR, which is a MAGA gift basket
to far-right extremists.
Let’s first address the reality. The
gutting cuts in this bill do not con-
tinue current funding like we have his-
torically done in continuing resolu-
tions. Instead, this so-called CR slashes
cancer and Alzheimer’s research,
defunds the police, and undercuts allies
like Israel and Ukraine.
Republicans claim to care about our
borders, but this invites more immigra-
tion problems. Instead of giving mi-
grants a path to work and pay taxes, it
leaves them to languish in substandard
private prisons.
This grab bag of budgetary garbage
stands no chance of becoming law and
just slingshots into a shutdown in 36
hours, a shutdown that harms every-
one, from seniors and servicemembers
to this Nation’s most vulnerable and
its very security. It snarls small-busi-
ness loans and trade, delays home
loans, and could force Federal contrac-
tors into layoffs.
It is a MAGA recipe for more chaos
and inflation, and my home State of
Florida will feel it first. The longer it
drags on, the deeper the airport lines
will get as TSA agents and air traffic
controllers go without pay and pass-
port processing slows down.
Worse, it actually makes our mili-
tary serve without pay. Don’t forget, in
the 2019 GOP shutdown, they forced
Coast Guard members into food banks.
That does not make America stronger.
Instead of making communities less
safe and handcuffing FEMA’s recovery
responsiveness, which this CR does,
why don’t Republicans join Democrats
to fight Big Pharma and keep lowering
drug prices like insulin?
Instead of a shutdown that closes So-
cial Security field offices, which this
CR does, and takes food from the
mouths of children, why won’t Repub-
licans join Democrats to bolster edu-
cation, healthcare, and climate invest-
ments like Americans want? Why? Be-
cause MAGA extremists don’t want to
make life better for all Americans.
They want to inflict pain on their own
leadership, on our government, and on
the American people. Why? Because it
covers up their lack of an agenda, ex-
cites their base, and throws gas on
their bonfires of distraction and chaos.
America deserves better than that
and so does this institution.
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker, I
yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from
Texas (Mr. A
RRINGTON
), the chairman
of the Committee on the Budget.
Mr. ARRINGTON. Mr. Speaker, poli-
cies have consequences. Over the last 2
years, we have seen a string of self-in-
flicted crises because of the policies of
my Democratic colleagues and this
President.
Let me give you examples: $11 tril-
lion over 2 years from my Democratic
colleagues, $6 trillion of which went to
the national debt, all of which lit the
fuse on this inflation firestorm, this
cost-of-living crisis that is punishing
working families from coast to coast.
We have to stop the spending that is
bankrupting this great country of ours.
This President’s dereliction of duty
to uphold the laws of the land, his fail-
ure to provide for a common defense, to
defend our sovereign borders, and to
put the safety and security of the
American people first has created an
unmitigated and unprecedented crisis
at the border, where we are being flood-
ed with criminal activity and drugs
that are killing people—300 a day, the
leading cause of death in the United
States.
We have a plan, and my Democratic
colleagues are going to have to respond
to that. We are going to fund the gov-
ernment and keep it open, but we are
going to give you measures to secure
the border and prioritize the safety of
the American people and reduce spend-
ing. We are going to save this country
and our children’s future while we are
at it because that is the responsible
thing to do not only for our country
and the citizens of our country but for
future generations of Americans who
will inherit the whirlwind if we don’t
start reining in this wasteful Wash-
ington spending.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of the
Republican funding bill, and I ask my
colleagues to do the same.
b 1230
Ms. D
E
LAURO. Mr. Speaker, I want
to take a few seconds here to let the
gentleman from Texas know that the
State of Texas will lose almost 14,000
teachers. That is going to be really
tough to explain that to families when
their children do not have a teacher in
the classroom.
In addition to that, almost 77,000
Texans will lose their low-income en-
ergy assistance benefits or have those
benefits cut. It is going to be a tough
time for folks, come the cooler months
or the warmer months, to take advan-
tage of this.
I think people need to be mindful of
the consequences of a 30 percent cut, or
in the case of LIHEAP, a 74 percent
cut, that they are proposing today.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentlewoman from Illinois (Mrs. R
AMI
-
REZ
).
Mrs. RAMIREZ. Mr. Speaker, I thank
the ranking member for yielding.
Mr. Speaker, I cannot believe that I
am standing here again having to re-
mind my colleagues that we are a na-
tion of immigrants. I am going to come
to this podium each time my Repub-
lican colleagues have amnesia about
where their families came from or try
to scapegoat the immigrant commu-
nity.
Introducing a continuing resolution
that cuts services and deports unac-
companied children, ending asylum,
and jailing families betrays a truth
about my colleagues.
They are more willing to scapegoat
and sacrifice the well-being of immi-
grants, children—that they say they
care so much about—babies—that they
say they care so much about—veterans,
the elderly and people experiencing
poverty than they are to do the hard
work of owning up to their failures,
their hypocrisy, their ineffective lead-
ership.
It is hypocritical to target immi-
grants when many of the people in this
Chamber have reaped the benefits of
immigrant labor and have become
wealthy on the backs of immigrant
sacrifice.
Let me tell you what my mother
tells me about her journey. It takes
courage to cross a border, to seek a job,
or to pursue an opportunity to raise
their children in safety.
The courage of our people stands in
stark contrast to the cowardice of my
colleagues. There is nothing people-
centered about this Republican CR.
There is nothing noble or redeeming
about it. It is time for a clean CR that
does not scapegoat the people this Na-
tion has been built on, and let’s stop
indulging the cowardice of my col-
leagues.
For this reason, Mr. Speaker, at the
appropriate time I will offer a motion
to recommit this bill back to com-
mittee. If the House rules permitted, I
would have offered the motion with an
important amendment to my bill. That
amendment would strike the section
that makes 30 percent cuts across the
board.
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous con-
sent to include the text of my amend-
ment in the R
ECORD
immediately prior
to the vote on the motion to recommit.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there
objection to the request of the gentle-
woman from Illinois?
There was no objection.
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker, I
would remind my colleagues in the
House and the American people that
last year, 900 immigrants died trying
to cross the border. That is not hu-
mane. That is insane, and that we are
not willing to look away and tolerate
in the name of what? No. That is what
is intolerable.
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\K29SE7.028 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSEH4892 September 29, 2023
I will not be lectured, Mr. Speaker,
when 900 migrants died trying to get to
the United States, and when there are
thousands of children who are now
missing that were supposed to be taken
care of by the United States Federal
Government.
You don’t hear about that. That is
not humane. This legislation puts an
end to that insanity.
Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman
from Ohio (Mr. J
ORDAN
), the chairman
of the Committee on the Judiciary.
Mr. JORDAN. Mr. Speaker, I thank
the gentleman for yielding.
Mr. Speaker, the fiscal year ends in
36 hours. This bill funds the govern-
ment. We have a $2 trillion deficit, $33
trillion debt. This bill cuts spending.
We have a border that is wide open.
This bill secures the border.
Those are three simple commonsense
things, but the most important of
those three is the one that Mr. D
IAZ
-
B
ALART
was just talking about, the
border situation.
Mr. Speaker, 2021 was the highest
number on record for illegal migrants
entering the country, the highest year
on record until 2022, and that was the
highest year on record until this year.
That is how bad this is.
Here is the important point: It is not
just conservatives, it is not just Repub-
licans talking about securing the bor-
der, the mayor of New York said the
migrant crisis will ‘‘destroy New York
City.’’
Everyone in the country knows what
needs to be done. This bill does it and
does it in a commonsense way. Reason-
able cuts in spending to deal with the
huge deficit we have, but most impor-
tantly it addresses the most pressing
issue we have.
The most pressing issue in the coun-
try today is the border situation. Ev-
eryone in the country knows it, it
seems, except Democrats in the United
States Congress.
Mr. Speaker, I urge a ‘‘yes’’ vote.
Ms. D
E
LAURO. Mr. Speaker, I would
take a second to tell the gentleman
from Ohio that 232,000 people in Ohio
will be without low-income energy as-
sistance benefits.
Further, there will be 5,500 teachers
who will be pulled out of classrooms,
and the families in both instances will
suffer while the gentleman talks about
issues that are not truly affecting what
is happening in the everyday lives of
the people that he represents.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. J
ACKSON
L
EE
).
Ms. JACKSON LEE. Mr. Speaker, let
me take a moment to offer my deepest
sympathy to the people of California,
her family, and the people of this Na-
tion on the passing of Senator F
EIN
-
STEIN
.
Mr. Speaker, this is a serious mo-
ment in history. This is a serious mo-
ment for patriots and persons coura-
geous enough to do the right thing.
I started out this morning by saying
it will be the American people that will
suffer, but it will be my neighbors in
Houston and my fellow Texans.
We have a solution, and I think it
should be very clearly stated. What my
friends on the other side of the aisle
are arguing is chaos and confusion.
They are arguing no solution. They are
shouting from the top of their lungs to
be heard and to generate excitement
for social media, but we have a very
calm situation.
The Senate has voted 77–19 to put for-
ward a reasoned extension, keeping the
funding as it is, making sure our mili-
tary is being paid, not cutting off
women and children from supplemental
nutrition—these are infants we are
talking about—and taking care of com-
munities, like the firefighters in the
West who are suffering after fighting
fires and other natural disasters.
They have a CR. It will come here. It
has a privileged status. That status
will allow us to vote. The government
will be open, and then the engagement
on issues that are in disagreement or
agreement could be worked out.
If we continue this shrill talk and
don’t reasonably act courageously as
patriots to be able to stop the suffering
of the American people, we will have
50,000 pounds of cocaine here because
we won’t have Customs and Border offi-
cers.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The
time of the gentlewoman has expired.
Ms. D
E
LAURO. Mr. Speaker, I yield
an additional 30 seconds to the gentle-
woman from Texas.
Ms. JACKSON LEE. Mr. Speaker, I
thank the gentlewoman for yielding
additional time.
Mr. Speaker, we will have 110,000
children—where their parents are going
to work—that will have no Head Start
slots; 65,000 will not have access to
childcare; 60,000 seniors will be robbed
of nutrition programs. Then we will
have 2.3 million women, infants, and
children, as I said, without WIC. No
educational dollars, fewer teachers,
4,000 fewer safety inspections, and we
will be undermining law enforcement.
So if everyone wants to be shrill,
here is a solution. Bring the tempera-
ture down, pass the Senate CR, open
the doors, and stop these draconian
cuts because you are hurting the Amer-
ican people and my fellow Houstonians.
Mr. Speaker, I rise to speak in opposition to
H.R. 5525 Continuing Appropriations and Bor-
der Security Enhancement Act, 2024.
The reckless funding proposal included in
this bill would painfully impact the lives of mil-
lions of Americans by making disastrous cuts
to programs that workers and families count
on every day.
Mr. Speaker, my colleagues on the other
side of the aisle are more focused on intro-
ducing unpopular and dangerous funding bills
that cut virtually all non-defense discretionary
funding by 8 percent than working on a bipar-
tisan solution that could be enacted.
The Republican funding bill is a short-term
radical solution and would only keep the gov-
ernment open until October 31, 2023.
This deadline guarantees Congress will
need to pass another Continuing Resolution
(CR) and means either House Republicans
will slash critical resources again at the end of
October or the dangerous cuts in this extreme
bill will be in place until Congress is able to
pass all 12 full-year bills.
In exchange for keeping the government
open, House Republicans are:
Slashing investments in the National Insti-
tutes of Health (NIH). Medical research into
treatments and cures for diseases like cancer,
Alzheimer’s, and heart disease would be cut
with the reduction of 2,000 research grants.
Furthering their goal of eliminating public
education by cutting funding for Title I, IDEA,
and Head Start. Cuts to Title I and IDEA
would be the equivalent of removing more
than 40,000 teachers and service providers
from classrooms serving low-income students
and students with disabilities. And approxi-
mately 100,000 children would lose access to
Head Start, undermining early education for
children in low-income communities and par-
ents’ ability to go to work.
Failing to support communities recovering
from natural disasters. In the midst of hurri-
cane season and with several response and
recovery efforts to major disasters underway,
this bill harms FEMA’s readiness by failing to
address the urgent need for additional Dis-
aster Relief Funds to address existing short-
falls and respond to future unknown disasters.
Cutting border security funding. Despite
claims that this bill prioritizes border security,
it does the opposite by cutting funding critical
to those operations. The bill would ensure dis-
ruption and chaos at the border, harm our
economy, empower transnational criminal or-
ganizations, endanger communities, and put
our agents’ and officers’ lives at risk.
Neglecting our water infrastructure by cut-
ting funds to the Army Corps of Engineers.
House Republicans are cutting funds to the
Army Corps of Engineers Construction activi-
ties by 21 percent. With $444 million slashed
from the Corps of Engineers’ Construction ac-
tivities, projects critical to waterway navigation
of supply chains, reducing flood and storm
damage, or providing ecosystem restoration
would freeze.
Taking food out of the mouths of children,
families, and seniors. House Republicans are
threatening food safety, raising the costs of
food, and killing jobs in rural communities by
slashing the Food Safety and Inspection Serv-
ice (FSIS) by 11 percent (or $124 million).
Turning their backs on America’s small busi-
nesses. The Small Business Administration
(SBA), Entrepreneurial Development Programs
would be cut by 8.1 percent. This means ap-
proximately 107,000 fewer small businesses
would be assisted. This would have a signifi-
cant impact on underserved communities such
as Veterans, Women, and Native American
entrepreneurs.
Slashing resources for the 988 Suicide &
Crisis Lifeline and Opioid Use Disorder treat-
ment. The Republican CR cuts funding for the
988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline by 18 percent.
Nearly 1 million people facing a suicidal or
mental health crisis would be unable to access
support services through the 988 Suicide and
Crisis Lifeline, and thousands of individuals
would be denied admission to opioid use dis-
order treatment, denying them a potentially
life-saving path to recovery.
Mr. Speaker, their unrealistic proposals al-
most guarantee that our government will shut
down tomorrow at midnight.
VerDate Sep 11 2014 07:13 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 9920 E:\CR\FM\K29SE7.030 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSE H4893 September 29, 2023
A Republican government shutdown would
hurt hard working families in Texas:
172,877 active duty and reserve personnel
serving our nation’s armed forces in Texas
would be forced to go without the pay they
earn during a shutdown.
The Small Business Administration would
stop processing small business loans, halting
a program that provides $2,742,702,800 in
funding to small businesses in Texas every
year.
176,276 people flying through Texas air-
ports every day would face potential delays
and safety concerns due to staffing impacts on
TSA agents and air traffic controllers.
786,686 people in Texas would soon lose
access to Special Supplemental Nutrition Pro-
gram for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)
benefits.
168,4l3 federal workers in Texas would be
furloughed or forced to work without pay, in
addition to the many employees of businesses
with government contracts who could be laid
off, furloughed, or see their hours cut.
Workers at the Food and Drug Administra-
tion (FDA) would be sidelined, risking interrup-
tions and delays to the 892 food safety, phar-
maceutical manufacturing, and other inspec-
tions conducted in Texas last year.
The Department of Agriculture would be
forced to stop processing housing loans,
which provide $456,125,359 in funding to help
2,742 families in rural Texas communities buy
homes every year.
The Department of Agriculture would be
forced to stop processing farm loans which
provide $209,391,000 in funding for farmers in
Texas every year.
3,291,584 Supplemental Nutrition Assist-
ance Program (SNAP) beneficiaries in Texas
would lose access to benefits in a prolonged
shutdown.
5,4l3,161 people who visit national parks in
Texas every year would be turned away or un-
able to fully access parks, monuments, and
museums.
State governments would be forced to pay
for federal services like the Temporary Assist-
ance for Needy Families (TANF) program, po-
tentially risking benefits for the 20,846 TANF
beneficiaries in Texas.
Mr. Speaker, I urge all my colleagues to op-
pose H.R. 5525 as its passage would be detri-
mental to lives of millions of Americans.
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker, I
will remind everyone what we are talk-
ing about today.
This keeps the government open. It
secures the border, and it, frankly, re-
duces wasteful spending. That is what
we are dealing with here.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentleman from Texas (Mr. R
OY
).
Mr. ROY. Mr. Speaker, I thank my
friend from Florida for yielding.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of this
legislation, strongly in support of this
legislation.
This is legislation that will make
sure our troops are paid. It will make
sure that our military can continue to
do its job. It will make sure that our
border is secured, and it will simply re-
turn funding of the Federal bureauc-
racy to pre-COVID levels. That is what
we are talking about here. That is
what my colleagues on the other side
of the aisle are so up in arms about,
that we must have a bureaucracy,
bloated with massive expenditures in a
post-COVID universe, or your life, as
you know it, is going to end.
When the Declaration of Independ-
ence was written, when our unalienable
rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit
of happiness were drafted, those rights
did not emanate from this floor.
That pursuit of happiness did not
come from this floor or anywhere in
this building because this building
didn’t exist. It didn’t come from Con-
gress because Congress didn’t exist.
The fact is that no matter what hap-
pens heading into this weekend, what-
ever the result, there are 50 State gov-
ernments that are continuing to oper-
ate. There are 3,000 counties, county
governments operating. There are
20,000 city and municipalities with gov-
ernments operating; 12,000 independent
school districts, because we have a
Federal system of government and we
are supposed to take care of ourselves
and our families and our communities.
We are not supposed to bankrupt our
country and devalue the dollar and
drive up inflation such that the Amer-
ican people can no longer afford to live.
That is what my colleagues on the
other side of the aisle are doing with
blank checks, with more borrowing,
more taxing, more spending, destroy-
ing the future of this country. That
stops now. We stand up on this side of
the aisle for sanity and a secure border.
Mr. Speaker, I support this legisla-
tion.
Ms. D
E
LAURO. Mr. Speaker, I find it
hard to believe that the gentleman
from Texas believes that wasteful
spending is on teachers who really
teach our youngsters, and 14,000 of
them will be gone in the State of
Texas.
I find it hard to believe that it is
wasteful spending to deal with 77,000
people who will lose their LIHEAP ben-
efits. Is that wasteful spending, for
people to have heat or be cooled or kids
being taught in school?
Let’s talk about wasteful spending
and the tax cuts my colleagues on the
other side of the aisle are willing to
give the richest one-tenth of 1 percent
of the people in this country and the
richest corporations, and tax cheats, I
might add, as well.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentleman from New York (Mr.
E
SPAILLAT
), the distinguished ranking
member of the Legislative Branch Sub-
committee.
Mr. ESPAILLAT. Mr. Speaker, I rise
in strong opposition to H.R. 5525, the
so-called spending reduction and bor-
der security act.
You want border security, Mr. Speak-
er, let’s do comprehensive immigration
reform. Let’s do it the way Ronald
Reagan did it back in the day: He
looked at everybody, all the families,
and allowed the men to work and con-
tribute to our economy.
This is a reprehensible and irascible
spending bill that slashes critical re-
sources from working-class families.
House Republicans are defunding law
enforcement. The so-called party of
public safety is now defunding law en-
forcement. So if something is hap-
pening in your district or your neigh-
borhood and you call the police and
they are late, law enforcement should
blame it on these cuts. The response
time will be impacted dramatically.
Social Security offices will be clos-
ing. Yes, I have seen the lines going
around the block with seniors as early
as 6 o’clock in the morning.
Guess what? They will be closing.
This bill is taking food out of chil-
dren’s mouths, and the mouths of fami-
lies, impacting Title 1 schools with
poverty levels—never seen before pov-
erty levels, and Title 3 students,
English language learners, and taking
thousands upon thousands of teachers
out of the classroom. Is this the way to
avoid a shutdown?
b 1245
This is a way to hurt families—work-
ing-class families, middle-class fami-
lies—that depend on these vital pro-
grams, Mr. Speaker, to survive and
move forward.
Nearly 150,000 teachers and service
providers will be removed from the
classroom serving low-income students
and students with disabilities.
In addition to that, approximately
275,000 kids will lose access to Head
Start—Head Start, the only surviving
program from the sixties that gives a
head start to children will be cut.
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker, I
yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from
Florida (Mr. D
ONALDS
), a friend and
neighbor of my district.
Mr. DONALDS. Mr. Speaker, $2 tril-
lion deficit, $33 trillion in debt, and
Washington just wants to continue to
grow.
Mr. Speaker, 20 percent inflation
year over year is crippling every fam-
ily in our country, and 8 percent mort-
gage rates are squeezing our real estate
market, and Washington just wants to
grow and grow.
Our cities are overrun with migrants
because of the reckless policies of the
President of the United States.
Fentanyl is killing 85,000 Americans
year over year, and congressional
Democrats refuse to secure the border.
Mr. Speaker, enough is enough. This
bill does one very important thing—
really two very important things.
Number one, it returns our govern-
ment back to pre-COVID spending lev-
els of 2019. COVID–19 is over. Why can’t
our government live within its means?
Our people have to live within their
means; our government should, as well.
I remember when there was a baby
formula shortage and mothers couldn’t
get food for their infants. Joe Biden
was nowhere. Congressional Democrats
were nowhere. All they said was spend
more money while the problems per-
sisted.
They are building shelters in parks in
New York City to house migrants, and
congressional Democrats say there is
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.009 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSEH4894 September 29, 2023
no issue at the border even though ev-
erybody sees the problems that exist.
This is the time to secure the border
of our Nation and to cut wasteless
spending in our government. If we are
going to have a society and a govern-
ment worthy of the people that we
serve, Washington has to do something
that Washington never seems to want
to do: restrain itself.
We have a fundamental obligation to
secure this Nation and to secure the
people that we all serve.
Coming out here talking about what
is going to happen with WIC is not
going to solve the problem. Talking
about the fiscal health of this Nation is
going to solve the problem.
Our national debt has been down-
graded twice now. The Democrats want
to spend more money. Support this
measure.
Ms. D
E
LAURO. Mr. Speaker, to both
of the gentlemen from Florida, 8,500
teachers, gone. Think about the kids
who are going to school and there is no
teacher for them. Think about folks
who need to heat or cool their homes.
We are looking at 36,000 households
that will be without those benefits.
Do they really care about those
folks? Probably not.
As a Democrat, I took the lead on the
infant formula crisis—I don’t know
where my colleague was during that
crisis—and called to attention a com-
pany that knowingly sold tainted prod-
uct and wound up killing three or four
people. I don’t know where he was dur-
ing that. I know where I was, and I
know where the administration was.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentleman from Mississippi (Mr.
T
HOMPSON
), the distinguished ranking
member of the Homeland Security
Committee.
Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi. Mr.
Speaker, I thank the gentlewoman
from Connecticut for yielding.
I rise today in strong opposition to
H.R. 5525, a bill more designed to ap-
pease the extreme MAGA wing of the
Republican Party than to stave off a
government shutdown.
With just hours remaining before our
Nation is thrust into an unnecessary
shutdown, the House is being forced to
waste time on a measure that would
impose draconian cuts to vital Federal
programs and compel the enactment of
H.R. 2, the child deportation act.
When we considered H.R. 2 in May, I
called it a cruel, extreme, unworkable
immigration and border security meas-
ure.
Time has not been kind to the bill.
It still would wreck our economy,
cripple our ports of entry, destroy the
asylum system, criminalize visa
overstays, force unaccompanied chil-
dren into dangerous situations, jail
families and children indefinitely, and
on top of all that, worsen conditions at
the border.
The child deportation act would
upend CBP’s ability to process mi-
grants at ports of entry and bar fund-
ing to humanitarian organizations that
provide shelter, transportation, and
legal assistance to children and fami-
lies fleeing horrific conditions.
Moreover, it does nothing to stem
the deadly flow of fentanyl into the
United States.
The Senate will not take up H.R.
5525, and it will never go to the Presi-
dent’s desk. The House must come to-
gether today and stop coddling extreme
MAGA members looking to get former
President Trump’s failed illegal and
immoral policies enacted into law. I
urge my colleagues to join me in de-
feating H.R. 5525 and call upon the
Speaker to have the House consider the
Senate’s bipartisan continuing resolu-
tion.
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker, I
yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from
Arizona (Mr. C
ISCOMANI
), a Member
whose life story symbolizes what the
American Dream is all about, and a
member of the Appropriations Com-
mittee.
Mr. CISCOMANI. Mr. Speaker, I
thank my friend for yielding. We are
living in a border crisis, the worst one
that we have ever seen. The numbers
show what used to be bi-annual num-
bers are now monthly and even weekly
numbers. There is no denying where we
are.
The Tucson sector, which is where I
live, has seen the worst of this, Mr.
Speaker. We are at home seeing street
releases now, just last week allowing
11,000 apprehensions and during this
month about 40,000. These are, again,
annual numbers in the past, and now
they are what we consider almost on a
weekly basis.
Now, I live in a county that is on the
border, and we are seeing it firsthand.
I know exactly how life is there. As
M
ARIO
D
IAZ
-B
ALART
, my good friend
from Florida mentioned, I am an immi-
grant myself. I know the journey. I be-
came a U.S. citizen in 2006 and became
a U.S. Congressman in 2022, 16 years
later.
I know this country is the country of
opportunity. I get why people want to
come here. However, this administra-
tion has allowed the cartels to run
amuck and handle the border and abuse
people as they are trying to do so.
Our local communities are suffering
because of that. They are the ones car-
rying the burden. We have cries from
help from both sides of the aisle. I hear
from mayors that are Democrats, may-
ors that are Republicans. It doesn’t
matter the party, they are all being
impacted the same way.
This administration has not
prioritized this crisis.
I will tell you, living on the border I
understand what I call the three buck-
ets. We can talk about immigration, we
can talk about trade and commerce,
and we can talk about security, and all
three are suffering right now because
of the lack of attention on this issue.
It is also a humanitarian problem
when this administration has lost
track of 85,000 minors. This is nothing
short of a humanitarian crisis, as well.
Not even that will make the President
wake up to this.
This is the worst time to be on the
verge of a shutdown in less than 48
hours. We cannot shut down. We have
to do what we can to protect our border
and keep our government funded.
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker,
may I inquire how much time is re-
maining.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gen-
tleman from Florida has 10 minutes re-
maining. The gentlewoman from Con-
necticut has 10
1
2
minutes remaining.
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker, I
reserve the balance of my time.
Ms. D
E
LAURO. Mr. Speaker, I re-
mind the gentleman from Arizona that
there will be 63,000 households in Ari-
zona that will be without the low-in-
come energy assistance benefits. These
are not just numbers. These are people,
and we are making their lives more dif-
ficult at a time when there is serious
inflation and when there is, in fact, a
high cost of living.
My colleagues on the other side of
the aisle are only adding and increas-
ing to that high cost of living.
I might also remind the gentleman
from Arizona that we are looking at
about 2,800 teachers.
Now, again, these are not just num-
bers. Children go to school. If there is
no teacher to teach them, what is the
result? What happens to parents when
they find out that their child’s teacher
is gone? If there was a teaching short-
age before, this will make it even
worse. That is the result of the cuts
that my colleagues on the other side of
the aisle want to make. It is there. It
is in black and white. You can’t make
up the numbers.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentlewoman from Michigan (Ms.
T
LAIB
).
Ms. TLAIB. Mr. Speaker, there are
human beings behind every single num-
ber that we talk about. Folks want to
debate policy and different kinds of ex-
tremist agenda items when they are in
charge. They can have committee hear-
ings and deal with it separately, but
right now we are literally hours away
from direct impact on children and
families and even the Federal workers,
many of whom are living paycheck-to-
paycheck.
A government shutdown will harm
the American people. That should be at
the center of the urgency that needs to
be met in this Chamber as we move for-
ward.
I know in Michigan I am going to see
207,000 women and children lose the
WIC program that provides nutrition
assistance, and literally 120,000 of them
are children.
I still remember, Mr. Speaker, in 2019
there was a shutdown for 35 days. Col-
leagues were wondering why the Fed-
eral workers were in food bank lines.
Why can’t they get loans, one of them
said. What are you talking about?
These are Federal workers who are liv-
ing—like a majority of Americans—
paycheck-to-paycheck, and you are ex-
pecting them to pay their rent, get
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\K29SE7.033 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSE H4895 September 29, 2023
food on the table, all the utilities
which continue to go up, but let’s go
ahead and cut LIHEAP by 75 percent.
Republicans’ priorities in this Cham-
ber are clear: starve, evict families liv-
ing in poverty, and cut people from es-
sential services. They don’t care. You
don’t care because they are going to
continue to get paid. You all are going
to continue to get paid while your resi-
dents are being impacted. If I hear you
lying one more time to the American
people and saying that Federal employ-
ees are going to get paid, they are not.
They are going to be forced to work
with no pay, especially those on mili-
tary bases, especially those that,
again, are on the front lines that can-
not just sit at home while you all fight
amongst each other.
It is time for Republicans to stop
playing these games with the American
people’s lives. They know this is an ex-
tremist bill; many of them know. It is
not going to go anywhere.
The American people, Mr. Speaker,
deserve better.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Mem-
bers are reminded to direct their re-
marks to the Chair.
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker, I
yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
Texas (Mr. P
FLUGER
).
Mr. PFLUGER. Mr. Speaker, I rise in
strong support of House Republicans’
plan to cut spending to keep govern-
ment open and to shut down the bor-
der. The President has failed Ameri-
cans. He has failed Texans. He has
failed us by not securing our border.
Mr. Speaker, 7
1
2
million illegal im-
migrants, 150 people just this year who
matched the terror watch list, 13,000
criminals, 100,000-plus fentanyl poi-
soning deaths is unacceptable. Enough
is enough.
This plan, which would also include
H.R. 2, the most secure border act in
decades, puts the President on notice.
Now is the time.
This is the most important border se-
curity vote in 20 years. This vote right
here not only cuts spending, but it
shuts down the border and the disaster,
the chaos, and the unacceptable level
of death that our President has caused.
This bill deserves our attention. I
urge my colleagues to cut the spend-
ing, to keep the government open, and
to shut down the border.
Ms. D
E
LAURO. Mr. Speaker, I re-
mind the gentleman from Texas that
the eyes of the people of Texas are
upon you when you are thinking about
really 77,000 seniors and kids without
any benefits from the low-income en-
ergy assistance program and also 14,000
teachers will be gone from Texas
schools.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1
1
2
minutes to
the gentlewoman from New York (Ms.
C
LARKE
).
b 1300
Ms. D
E
LAURO. Mr. Speaker, I yield
1
1
2
minutes to the gentlewoman from
New York (Ms. C
LARKE
).
Ms. CLARKE of New York. Mr.
Speaker, I rise on this day in opposi-
tion to the continuing resolution,
which includes the Republican extreme
and restrictive immigration and border
security legislation, H.R. 2.
This cruel legislation would force
draconian restrictions and punish-
ments on migrants and asylum seekers
and set America’s immigration prior-
ities back decades. This bill would
damage the asylum system, a process
millions upon millions of vulnerable
and desperate people and families have
long depended on for their safety and
future.
Instead of putting forth legislation
that can pass the Senate and avert a
government shutdown, extreme Repub-
licans would rather hold the economy
and border security hostage, throwing
millions of lives into a tailspin.
Let’s be clear. Any bill that would
allow vulnerable migrant children to
be inhumanely detained by Border Pa-
trol for up to a month, to be ripped
from their families and locked up from
the world, is unacceptable. It is fun-
damentally un-American.
To treat innocent people who are
looking for a better life in our Nation
with such contempt, such vitriol, such
callousness, while also making Amer-
ican families vulnerable in putting
food on their tables, that is not leader-
ship. It is called cowardice.
Every American, no matter how long
their families have called this country
their own, should be outraged at the
GOP embracing the Trump administra-
tion’s failed and immoral border poli-
cies to keep the government open.
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker, I
yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from
South Dakota (Mr. J
OHNSON
), an au-
thor of this bill.
Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota. Mr.
Speaker, so often around here, we vote
on half measures, narrow bills that, at
best, address one issue in only a mod-
est way. This is not that bill. This is an
opportunity in one vote to shut the
border, to keep the government open,
and to reduce spending.
The five conservative leaders who,
with me, crafted this proposal knew
that bold action was needed.
Crisis one: We are $33 trillion in debt.
That is pushing us toward insolvency.
That number has grown by 50 percent
in just the last 4 years. This bill puts
us back on the right track and cuts bil-
lions of spending, even just in the next
month.
Two, a shutdown accomplishes noth-
ing. It does not save a nickel. In fact,
it costs the American taxpayers bil-
lions. This stopgap funding measure
makes sure our government stays open.
Three, 1.8 million illegal crossings at
our southern border is unacceptable.
This bill puts into place the policies
that we know work to secure our bor-
der.
Mr. Speaker, I will admit to not un-
derstanding fully those who oppose this
bill. I do not understand why anyone
would choose open borders over an
open government.
Mr. Speaker, we are here to solve
problems. Chaos is not a legislative
strategy. In a few moments, I will vote
to keep the government open, to cut
spending, and to secure our border. I
urge my colleagues to do the same.
Ms. D
E
LAURO. Mr. Speaker, I yield
myself such time as I may consume.
It is almost laughable to think about
chaos. I think the majority has dem-
onstrated overwhelmingly in the last
several days, the last several months,
an unwillingness to govern, an inabil-
ity to govern, and chaos, general chaos,
here.
It is interesting. The gentleman is
from South Dakota, where, last I un-
derstood, a little bit like the North-
east, in New England, it gets cold. It
gets cold in the wintertime in South
Dakota. The gentleman is happy to see
24,000 individuals not get energy assist-
ance, low-income heating assistance.
We may be taking up a collection of
hats and coats and gloves, et cetera,
because they are not going to get their
LIHEAP benefits in a cold climate.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of
my time.
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker, I
yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
Wisconsin (Mr. G
ROTHMAN
).
Mr. GROTHMAN. Mr. Speaker, we
are here today because we think the
government is going to shut down on
Sunday. That is because there are sup-
posed to be 12 separate bills that com-
prise our budget that were supposed to
be passed by now. We have passed the
four most important. Unfortunately,
the Senate has not passed any, so we
have to move forward from here.
We don’t know what the shutdown
means. I hope the press is on the ball
and pays careful attention if anything
is shut down that President Trump did
not shut down a few years ago. There is
a lot of flexibility for Presidents to
show if they are compassionate or not.
If there is anything shut down that
President Trump didn’t shut down, it is
something we have to talk about.
Let’s look at the problems we have in
this country right now, two big prob-
lems. The first is what is going on at
the border. We used to have about
10,000 cross the border. We are now over
200,000. We are addressing it. The
American public is tired of paying
more taxes and spending money and
seeing an open border every night.
That is one of the reasons why we
have to pass the bill. The other reason
is we have to make a little bit of a dent
in the out-of-control spending.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to
vote ‘‘yes’’ on H.R. 5525.
Ms. D
E
LAURO. Mr. Speaker, I want
to let the gentleman from Wisconsin
know that 195,000 households are bene-
ficiaries of the LIHEAP program. They
will be jettisoned from that program. If
you think it is cold in this Chamber,
head to Wisconsin and you will know
how cold it is in the wintertime. Think
twice about whether or not you will
vote to cut 195,000 people’s benefits.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of
my time.
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Chair, I
yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
Georgia (Mr. A
USTIN
S
COTT
).
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\K29SE7.034 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSEH4896 September 29, 2023
Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia. Mr.
Speaker, I thought I would go ahead
and respond because I know as soon as
I sit down, the gentlewoman from Con-
necticut is going to talk about the
schoolteachers in Georgia, and my sis-
ter is one of them. She gets her check
from the county, in case you didn’t
know it. It kind of bothers me that you
seem to think that they get a check
from the Federal Government. They
actually get paid by the county, as do
our sheriff’s deputies.
How did we get here? I have heard
the left talk about the chaos caucus
that we have, candidly, as Republicans
and what gives them the power. It only
takes five of them to create a disrup-
tion. How do five get the power? The
five in our party get the power because
the 212 of you on the Democratic side
are going to vote with them to shut
down the government.
Now, a continuing resolution is a 30-
day piece of legislation that I will
admit is not perfect, but it is better
than a shutdown or the chaos that
comes with a shutdown.
The idea that we as Republicans and
the American citizens have to eat a $2
trillion deficit or else you are going to
shut down the government is abso-
lutely ridiculous.
We are not at war. We are not in a re-
cession. We are in no health emer-
gency. Show a little responsibility.
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr.
L
AWLER
). Members are reminded to di-
rect their remarks to the Chair.
Ms. D
E
LAURO. Mr. Speaker, I re-
serve the balance of my time.
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker, I
yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman
from New York (Ms. M
ALLIOTAKIS
).
Ms. MALLIOTAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I
hope the American people are listening
right now. The Democrats would rather
shut down the government than end an
unsustainable and unsafe border crisis
that has flooded our streets with
fentanyl, an unsustainable flow of ille-
gal immigrants destroying New York
City, as Mayor Adams says, and only
enriching the drug cartels.
This bill is common sense, and every-
one should support it. It does three
things that the American people want.
It avoids a shutdown; it cuts excessive,
wasteful spending that has led us to a
$33 trillion debt; and it secures our bor-
der. It stops an unsustainable and un-
safe crisis.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to
put taxpaying, hardworking American
citizens and their safety first.
I heard my colleague from New York
City say that it was cruel that we want
to secure our borders. Do you know
what is cruel? In New York City yes-
terday, at one of the migrant shelters,
a 7-year-old girl was sexually abused.
Do you know what is cruel? Somebody
was stabbed at the Roosevelt shelter in
Manhattan. The fact is, there are doz-
ens of crimes being committed, and our
mayor and you guys are doing nothing
about it.
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker,
may I inquire as to how much time is
remaining.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gen-
tleman from Florida has 4
1
4
minutes
remaining. The gentlewoman from
Connecticut has 3
1
2
minutes remain-
ing.
Ms. D
E
LAURO. Mr. Speaker, I find it
unbelievable that the gentlewoman
from New York would support a bill
that cuts $1 billion from our ally in the
Middle East—that is, from Israel.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of
my time.
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker, I
yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
Arkansas (Mr. H
ILL
).
Mr. HILL. Mr. Speaker, this is an im-
portant day. This Congress needs to
come together to go back and get our
spending under control and also get our
border under control.
Both are of concern to the American
people. We hear about it in our offices
every day. The spending is
unsustainable, but 200,000 people a
month coming across the border and
living in this country illegally is also
unsustainable.
This bill is a product of hard work for
weeks to give us time to complete our
appropriations work, to negotiate with
the Senate while at the same time re-
ducing spending, which has been an av-
alanche of out-of-control spending for
the last 2 years, and to secure our bor-
der.
Mr. Speaker, I stand in support of it,
and I urge my colleagues to support it.
Ms. D
E
LAURO. Mr. Speaker, I re-
serve the balance of my time.
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker, I
yield 1
1
2
minutes to the gentleman
from New York (Mr. M
OLINARO
).
Mr. MOLINARO. Mr. Speaker, after
pouring trillions of dollars into the
American economy, after ignoring the
crisis at our southern border, after
closing schools and forcing kids to
learn from home, after denying life-af-
firming services to young people with
disabilities, we have been lectured
about how great these last 2 years have
been for the American people.
We have, in this very moment, the
ability to avert a government shut-
down and, at the same time, finally
take some responsibility for reckless,
wasteful Federal spending.
There is no excuse to pick the pock-
ets of hardworking American families
who are already overburdened because
of inflation, the high cost of gas, the
high cost of groceries, the inability to
access or find a job, and running up
their credit cards.
We have the ability now to avert a
government shutdown, control Federal
spending, and secure the border, an
open border that is taking too many
American children’s lives because of
fentanyl and destroying communities
all across this country.
The mayor of New York is saying the
President has ignored his call and that
inaction at the border is destroying the
city of New York. We have, in this very
moment, the ability to avert a shut-
down, respect American taxpayers, and
secure the American borders.
Ms. D
E
LAURO. Mr. Speaker, I yield
myself the balance of my time.
What we are looking at here is a
piece of legislation that makes a 30
percent cut in programs that have a se-
rious effect on the lives of the people in
this country.
Let me just lay out some of them be-
cause these have not been talked about
so far.
The National Institutes of Health
will be cut. There would be a reduction
of 7,000 research grants.
b 1315
I think we have people in this Cham-
ber on both sides of the aisle who have
had a loved one with a cancer diagnosis
or Alzheimer’s or heart disease, but
there is a willingness to cut the Na-
tional Institutes of Health and thereby
cut 7,000 research grants.
Let’s take a look at our allies. We
speak about Israel and Ukraine. Israel
will receive a $1 billion cut in the funds
that the U.S. provides. We talk about
Israel as being our closest ally in the
Middle East.
People should understand what is in
this bill. We defund—not we—my Re-
publican colleagues defund law enforce-
ment, reduce drug enforcement admin-
istration agents, Federal law enforce-
ment officers, eliminate hundreds of
State and local law enforcement.
They talk about crime, and they talk
about law and order, but there is a
willingness to cut the funds in order
for us to make our communities safe.
Social Security offices, the field of-
fices, would be forced to close down, re-
ducing access to in-person services.
People applying for disability bene-
fits will wait additional months for the
processing of claims. That is what is in
store with this bill if you support it.
Wildfire suppression efforts will be
hindered, 57 percent cuts, and we know
what devastation wildfires have had all
over our country. Look at what hap-
pened in Maui.
Unbelievable that they would talk
about a bill, extol a bill that has such
devastating repercussions on the peo-
ple of this country.
They slashed the resources for the 988
Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. Opioid use
disorder. They are worried and talk
about an opioid crisis, but let’s cut off
the avenue where people can get treat-
ment and help and potentially save
their lives.
Education. It is an abomination,
what they will do to education because
they are on a march to eliminate pub-
lic education in the United States of
America; that opportunity that all of
our families have said: Go to school,
get an education so that you can suc-
ceed.
Rural America? Let’s care about
rural America, not cutting the loans
and grants for farmers and rural com-
munities.
They will make it harder for farmers
to access loans and grants, making
home farm ownership more difficult.
They cut rural housing, rural utility,
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\K29SE7.036 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSE H4897 September 29, 2023
broadband to keep people in touch, and
they eliminate health services for rural
and underserved families.
Mr. Speaker, 2 million vulnerable in-
dividuals and families will lose access
to healthcare services. They take food
out of the mouths of children, families,
and seniors.
Mr. Speaker, there needs to be a
‘‘no’’ vote on this irresponsible con-
tinuing resolution. I yield back the bal-
ance of my time.
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker, oh,
so many words. Allow me, Mr. Speaker,
to cut to the chase. We have a choice
right now.
Vote ‘‘yes’’ to keep the Federal Gov-
ernment open, to control inflation-
causing overspending, and to secure
the southern border. That is a ‘‘yes’’
vote, or vote ‘‘no’’ to shut down the
Federal Government, to keep the narco
cartels in control of the southern bor-
der.
This is pretty simple. Government
likes to complicate things. As politi-
cians, we like to try to obfuscate re-
ality.
This is very simple. We have a
choice. I ask our colleagues to do the
responsible thing; secure the border,
stop out-of-control, inflation-causing
spending, and, yes, keep the govern-
ment open by voting ‘‘yes.’’
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance
of my time.
Ms. M
C
COLLUM. Mr. Speaker, in just over
24 hours, if we cannot come to an honest, re-
sponsible, and bipartisan solution on a con-
tinuing resolution to fund federal agencies. we
will be forced into a government shutdown.
Our constituents are relying on us to work
together to fulfill our constitutional responsi-
bility to fund their government. Failing to do so
will harm this nation’s children and families,
our service members and veterans, our sen-
iors and our next generation, and all those
who depend on the services and investments
our government provides.
Let me be clear: This is a completely avoid-
able, politically-manufactured crisis, but it will
have real consequences for the American
people.
The looming shutdown is the result of a fail-
ure to govern by the House Republican Major-
ity, who have allowed this body’s legislative
work to be undermined by an extreme MAGA
faction that controls GOP leadership. Demo-
crats in the House, President Biden, and a bi-
partisan Senate have been working for a solu-
tion to prevent a shutdown. This included
compromising to meet Republican demands to
cap spending levels for the next two years
under the Fiscal Responsibility Act, which
passed both the House and the Senate with
bipartisan support and was signed into law by
President Biden less than four months ago.
But that wasn’t enough for these GOP extrem-
ists.
Instead of doing the serious work of moving
bipartisan bills at those agreed upon levels,
this Republican Majority has chosen chaos.
They have chosen to waste months pursuing
devastating cuts to the services the American
people rely on, slashing investments in keep-
ing people and our planet healthy—all while
loading up their appropriations bills with toxic
culture war provisions that are discriminating
and harmful to our families and our commu-
nities.
And the Continuing Resolution they have
brought to the floor today is nothing more than
a continuation of their denial of the serious
work that needs to be done. It does nothing to
avoid a shutdown.
Instead, Republicans are holding the Amer-
ican people hostage with a demand for a 30
precent cut across the board to federal agen-
cies.
This would result in a 74 percent cut to our
federal investments in the Low Income Home
Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), literally
leaving families in the cold that is already set-
tling in back home in Minnesota.
They are proposing to cut nutrition support
for Women, Infants, and Children by 30 per-
cent, taking away a lifeline for hungry families
and pregnant women.
They want to see investments in the health
of our communities gutted:
Their bill would mean the loss of thousands
of research grants to cure Alzheimer’s dis-
ease, cancers, and heart disease;
Thousands of my constituents would lose
access to care at their Community Health
Centers, as would millions more rural and un-
derserved families nationwide;
Millions more who are struggling with opioid
addiction or mental health crises would be de-
nied life-saving support services.
There is no end to the harm and hurt that
this extreme Republican Continuing Resolution
would cause to our families, our economy, and
our communities if passed into law. But
Speaker M
C
C
ARTHY
knows that there is no
chance that this bill will become law because
Democrats in the House, a bipartisan majority
of Senators, and President Biden would never
support this betrayal of our responsibilities to
our fellow Americans.
Until the House Republican Majority stops
catering to the bullies in their caucus, we can-
not move forward on funding the federal gov-
ernment.
So I invite my colleagues on the other side
of the aisle to stop the chaos.
Join us in doing the serious work of funding
our government and meeting the needs of our
constituents. With just five reasonable Repub-
lican votes, we can force Speaker M
C
C
ARTHY
to take up a vote on a bipartisan solution.
America deserves better leadership than
what the Chaos Caucus has to offer.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. All time
for debate has expired.
Pursuant to House Resolution 741,
the previous question is ordered on the
bill.
The question is on the engrossment
and third reading of the bill.
The bill was ordered to be engrossed
and read a third time, and was read the
third time.
MOTION TO RECOMMIT
Mrs. RAMIREZ. Mr. Speaker, I have
a motion to recommit at the desk.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The
Clerk will report the motion to recom-
mit.
The Clerk read as follows:
Ms. Ramirez of Illinois moves to recommit
the bill H.R. 5525 to the Committee on Ap-
propriations.
The material previously referred to
by Mrs. R
AMIREZ
is as follows:
Ms. Ramirez moves to recommit the bill
H.R. 5525 to the Committee on Appropria-
tions with the following amendment:
Strike subsection (b) of section 101 of divi-
sion A.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu-
ant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX, the pre-
vious question is ordered on the motion
to recommit.
The question is on the motion to re-
commit.
The question was taken; and the
Speaker pro tempore announced that
the noes appeared to have it.
Mrs. RAMIREZ. Mr. Speaker, on that
I demand the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu-
ant to clause 9 of rule XX, the Chair
will reduce to 5 minutes the minimum
time for any electronic vote on the
question of passage.
The vote was taken by electronic de-
vice, and there were—yeas 210, nays
216, not voting 6, as follows:
[Roll No. 510]
YEAS—210
Adams
Aguilar
Allred
Auchincloss
Balint
Barraga
´
n
Beatty
Bera
Beyer
Bishop (GA)
Blumenauer
Blunt Rochester
Bonamici
Bowman
Boyle (PA)
Brown
Brownley
Budzinski
Caraveo
Carbajal
Ca
´
rdenas
Carson
Carter (LA)
Cartwright
Casar
Case
Casten
Castor (FL)
Castro (TX)
Cherfilus-
McCormick
Chu
Clark (MA)
Clarke (NY)
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly
Correa
Costa
Courtney
Craig
Crockett
Crow
Cuellar
Davids (KS)
Davis (IL)
Davis (NC)
Dean (PA)
DeGette
DeLauro
DelBene
Deluzio
DeSaulnier
Dingell
Doggett
Escobar
Eshoo
Espaillat
Evans
Fletcher
Foster
Foushee
Frankel, Lois
Frost
Gallego
Garamendi
Garcı
´
a (IL)
Garcia (TX)
Garcia, Robert
Golden (ME)
Goldman (NY)
Gomez
Gonzalez,
Vicente
Gottheimer
Green, Al (TX)
Grijalva
Harder (CA)
Hayes
Higgins (NY)
Himes
Horsford
Houlahan
Hoyer
Hoyle (OR)
Huffman
Ivey
Jackson (IL)
Jackson (NC)
Jackson Lee
Jacobs
Jayapal
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Kamlager-Dove
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Khanna
Kildee
Kilmer
Kim (NJ)
Krishnamoorthi
Kuster
Landsman
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Lee (NV)
Lee (PA)
Leger Fernandez
Levin
Lieu
Lofgren
Lynch
Magaziner
Manning
Matsui
McBath
McClellan
McCollum
McGarvey
McGovern
Meeks
Menendez
Meng
Mfume
Moore (WI)
Morelle
Moskowitz
Moulton
Mrvan
Mullin
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal
Neguse
Nickel
Norcross
Ocasio-Cortez
Omar
Pallone
Panetta
Pappas
Pascrell
Payne
Pelosi
Perez
Peters
Pettersen
Phillips
Pingree
Pocan
Porter
Pressley
Quigley
Ramirez
Raskin
Ross
Ruiz
Ruppersberger
Ryan
Salinas
Sa
´
nchez
Sarbanes
Scanlon
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schneider
Scholten
Schrier
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Sewell
Sherman
Sherrill
Slotkin
Smith (WA)
Sorensen
Soto
Spanberger
Stansbury
Stanton
Stevens
Strickland
Swalwell
Sykes
Takano
Thanedar
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Titus
Tlaib
Tokuda
Tonko
Torres (CA)
Torres (NY)
Trahan
Trone
Underwood
Vargas
Vasquez
Veasey
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\K29SE7.038 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSEH4898 September 29, 2023
Vela
´
zquez
Wasserman
Schultz
Waters
Watson Coleman
Wexton
Wild
Williams (GA)
Wilson (FL)
NAYS—216
Aderholt
Alford
Allen
Amodei
Armstrong
Arrington
Babin
Bacon
Baird
Balderson
Banks
Barr
Bean (FL)
Bentz
Bergman
Bice
Biggs
Bilirakis
Bishop (NC)
Boebert
Bost
Brecheen
Buchanan
Buck
Bucshon
Burchett
Burgess
Burlison
Calvert
Cammack
Carey
Carl
Carter (GA)
Chavez-DeRemer
Ciscomani
Cline
Cloud
Cole
Collins
Comer
Crane
Crawford
Crenshaw
Curtis
D’Esposito
Davidson
De La Cruz
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Donalds
Duarte
Duncan
Dunn (FL)
Edwards
Ellzey
Emmer
Estes
Ezell
Fallon
Feenstra
Ferguson
Finstad
Fischbach
Fitzgerald
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Flood
Foxx
Franklin, C.
Scott
Fry
Fulcher
Gaetz
Gallagher
Garbarino
Garcia, Mike
Gimenez
Gonzales, Tony
Good (VA)
Gooden (TX)
Gosar
Granger
Graves (LA)
Graves (MO)
Green (TN)
Greene (GA)
Griffith
Grothman
Guest
Guthrie
Hageman
Harris
Harshbarger
Hern
Higgins (LA)
Hill
Hinson
Houchin
Hudson
Huizenga
Hunt
Issa
Jackson (TX)
James
Johnson (LA)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson (SD)
Jordan
Joyce (OH)
Joyce (PA)
Kean (NJ)
Kelly (MS)
Kelly (PA)
Kiggans (VA)
Kiley
Kim (CA)
Kustoff
LaHood
LaLota
Lamborn
Langworthy
Latta
LaTurner
Lawler
Lee (FL)
Lesko
Letlow
Loudermilk
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Luttrell
Mace
Malliotakis
Mann
Massie
Mast
McCaul
McClain
McClintock
McCormick
McHenry
Meuser
Miller (IL)
Miller (OH)
Miller (WV)
Miller-Meeks
Mills
Molinaro
Moolenaar
Mooney
Moore (AL)
Moore (UT)
Moran
Murphy
Nehls
Newhouse
Norman
Nunn (IA)
Obernolte
Ogles
Owens
Palmer
Pence
Perry
Pfluger
Posey
Reschenthaler
Rodgers (WA)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rose
Rosendale
Rouzer
Roy
Rutherford
Salazar
Santos
Scalise
Schweikert
Scott, Austin
Self
Sessions
Simpson
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smucker
Spartz
Stauber
Steel
Stefanik
Steil
Steube
Strong
Tenney
Thompson (PA)
Tiffany
Timmons
Turner
Valadao
Van Drew
Van Duyne
Van Orden
Wagner
Walberg
Waltz
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Wenstrup
Westerman
Williams (NY)
Williams (TX)
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Womack
Yakym
Zinke
NOT VOTING—6
Bush
Carter (TX)
Clyde
LaMalfa
Luna
Peltola
b 1339
Messrs. DUNCAN, BURCHETT, TUR-
NER, D
ES
JARLAIS, GREEN of Ten-
nessee, COLE, BUCSHON, and Mrs.
RODGERS of Washington changed
their vote from ‘‘yea’’ to ‘‘nay.’’
Messrs. GALLEGO and CLYBURN
changed their vote from ‘‘nay’’ to
‘‘yea.’’
So the motion to recommit was re-
jected.
The result of the vote was announced
as above recorded.
A motion to reconsider was laid on
the table.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The
question is on the passage of the bill.
The question was taken; and the
Speaker pro tempore announced that
the ayes appeared to have it.
Ms. D
E
LAURO. Mr. Speaker, on that
I demand the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a
5-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic de-
vice, and there were—yeas 198, nays
232, not voting 3, as follows:
[Roll No. 511]
YEAS—198
Aderholt
Alford
Allen
Amodei
Armstrong
Arrington
Babin
Bacon
Baird
Balderson
Banks
Barr
Bean (FL)
Bentz
Bergman
Bice
Bilirakis
Bost
Brecheen
Buchanan
Bucshon
Burgess
Calvert
Cammack
Carey
Carl
Carter (GA)
Chavez-DeRemer
Ciscomani
Cline
Clyde
Cole
Collins
Comer
Crawford
Crenshaw
Curtis
D’Esposito
Davidson
De La Cruz
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Donalds
Duarte
Duncan
Dunn (FL)
Edwards
Ellzey
Emmer
Estes
Ezell
Fallon
Feenstra
Ferguson
Finstad
Fischbach
Fitzgerald
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Flood
Foxx
Franklin, C.
Scott
Fry
Fulcher
Gallagher
Garbarino
Garcia, Mike
Gimenez
Gonzales, Tony
Good (VA)
Gooden (TX)
Granger
Graves (LA)
Graves (MO)
Green (TN)
Griffith
Grothman
Guest
Guthrie
Hageman
Harris
Harshbarger
Hern
Higgins (LA)
Hill
Hinson
Houchin
Hudson
Huizenga
Issa
Jackson (TX)
James
Johnson (LA)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson (SD)
Jordan
Joyce (OH)
Joyce (PA)
Kean (NJ)
Kelly (MS)
Kelly (PA)
Kiggans (VA)
Kiley
Kim (CA)
Kustoff
LaHood
LaLota
LaMalfa
Lamborn
Langworthy
Latta
LaTurner
Lawler
Lee (FL)
Lesko
Letlow
Loudermilk
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Luttrell
Malliotakis
Mann
Massie
Mast
McCarthy
McCaul
McClain
McClintock
McCormick
McHenry
Meuser
Miller (OH)
Miller (WV)
Miller-Meeks
Molinaro
Moolenaar
Moore (UT)
Moran
Murphy
Newhouse
Norman
Nunn (IA)
Obernolte
Owens
Palmer
Pence
Perry
Pfluger
Posey
Reschenthaler
Rodgers (WA)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rose
Rouzer
Roy
Rutherford
Salazar
Santos
Scalise
Schweikert
Scott, Austin
Sessions
Simpson
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smucker
Spartz
Stauber
Steel
Stefanik
Steil
Steube
Strong
Tenney
Thompson (PA)
Tiffany
Timmons
Turner
Valadao
Van Drew
Van Duyne
Van Orden
Wagner
Walberg
Waltz
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Wenstrup
Westerman
Williams (NY)
Williams (TX)
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Womack
Yakym
Zinke
NAYS—232
Adams
Aguilar
Allred
Auchincloss
Balint
Barraga
´
n
Beatty
Bera
Beyer
Biggs
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NC)
Blumenauer
Blunt Rochester
Boebert
Bonamici
Bowman
Boyle (PA)
Brown
Brownley
Buck
Budzinski
Burchett
Burlison
Bush
Caraveo
Carbajal
Ca
´
rdenas
Carson
Carter (LA)
Cartwright
Casar
Case
Casten
Castor (FL)
Castro (TX)
Cherfilus-
McCormick
Chu
Clark (MA)
Clarke (NY)
Cleaver
Cloud
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly
Correa
Costa
Courtney
Craig
Crane
Crockett
Crow
Cuellar
Davids (KS)
Davis (IL)
Davis (NC)
Dean (PA)
DeGette
DeLauro
DelBene
Deluzio
DeSaulnier
Dingell
Doggett
Escobar
Eshoo
Espaillat
Evans
Fletcher
Foster
Foushee
Frankel, Lois
Frost
Gaetz
Gallego
Garamendi
Garcı
´
a (IL)
Garcia (TX)
Garcia, Robert
Golden (ME)
Goldman (NY)
Gomez
Gonzalez,
Vicente
Gosar
Gottheimer
Green, Al (TX)
Greene (GA)
Grijalva
Harder (CA)
Hayes
Higgins (NY)
Himes
Horsford
Houlahan
Hoyer
Hoyle (OR)
Huffman
Hunt
Ivey
Jackson (IL)
Jackson (NC)
Jackson Lee
Jacobs
Jayapal
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Kamlager-Dove
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Khanna
Kildee
Kilmer
Kim (NJ)
Krishnamoorthi
Kuster
Landsman
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Lee (NV)
Lee (PA)
Leger Fernandez
Levin
Lieu
Lofgren
Lynch
Mace
Magaziner
Manning
Matsui
McBath
McClellan
McCollum
McGarvey
McGovern
Meeks
Menendez
Meng
Mfume
Miller (IL)
Mills
Mooney
Moore (AL)
Moore (WI)
Morelle
Moskowitz
Moulton
Mrvan
Mullin
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal
Neguse
Nehls
Nickel
Norcross
Ocasio-Cortez
Ogles
Omar
Pallone
Panetta
Pappas
Pascrell
Payne
Pelosi
Perez
Peters
Pettersen
Phillips
Pingree
Pocan
Porter
Pressley
Quigley
Ramirez
Raskin
Rosendale
Ross
Ruiz
Ruppersberger
Ryan
Salinas
Sa
´
nchez
Sarbanes
Scanlon
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schneider
Scholten
Schrier
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Self
Sewell
Sherman
Sherrill
Slotkin
Smith (WA)
Sorensen
Soto
Spanberger
Stansbury
Stanton
Stevens
Strickland
Swalwell
Sykes
Takano
Thanedar
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Titus
Tlaib
Tokuda
Tonko
Torres (CA)
Torres (NY)
Trahan
Trone
Underwood
Vargas
Vasquez
Veasey
Vela
´
zquez
Wasserman
Schultz
Waters
Watson Coleman
Wexton
Wild
Williams (GA)
Wilson (FL)
NOT VOTING—3
Carter (TX) Luna Peltola
b 1346
So the bill was not passed.
The result of the vote was announced
as above recorded.
A motion to reconsider was laid on
the table.
f
b 1400
REMEMBERING THE HONORABLE
DIANNE FEINSTEIN
(Mr. PAYNE asked and was given
permission to address the House for 1
minute and to revise and extend his re-
marks.)
Mr. PAYNE. Mr. Speaker, I rise
today to honor the late U.S. Senator
D
IANNE
F
EINSTEIN
.
VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:59 Sep 30, 2023 Jkt 039060 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A29SE7.013 H29SEPT1
dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with HOUSE