60 | Social Education | January/February 2023
certicate primarily as a means of forwarding cur-
ricular outcomes and providing rich experiences
for students. After speaking with stakeholders we
came to see the certicate as a means of prepar-
ing a global workforce, as a critical component
of STEM education, as a means to bolster Illinois
agriculture and agribusiness sectors, as a means
of attracting foreign investment to our state, as an
opportunity to build community and foster toler-
ance, and much more.
In addition to expanding the purpose and
appeal of the certicate, coalition building also
connected us with people such as Shawn Healy,
Donna McCaw, and Mary O’Brian who had the
expertise needed to help us with policy creation,
workshop organization, and assessment.
Reaching Consensus
The people we engaged to help with policy, work-
shops and assessment were critical to harnessing
the energy of the 50+ stakeholders who attended
Illinois Global Scholar workshops. The goal of
these workshops was to reach consensus on
certicate requirements and begin the process of
developing a robust assessment of global compe-
tency. Though these goals would be reached, the
process took time and effort as questions related
to equity, access, and rigor surfaced during work-
shop deliberations. Would the certicate require
a minimum grade point average? Would schools
that were less well-resourced be able to admin-
ister the certicate? Could four years of a world
language be required? What were the criteria by
which global courses would be determined?
As members of the coalition grappled with
these questions, a set of core values began to
emerge that came to inform decision making
about the certicate. This consensus building
didn’t mean everyone present got everything they
wanted. For example, prior to the workshops one
of our most important partners, the Illinois State
Board of Education (ISBE) indicated that it would
not support a certicate program that included a
four-year world language requirement because
less than half of the schools in Illinois offered a
fourth-year course. Members of the Illinois Council
of Teaching Foreign Languages strongly objected.
They had hoped that the certicate would expand
world language instruction in our state and were
disappointed with the state Board of Education’s
position.
On the assessment side, workshop attendees
labored to articulate a shared vision of what a
global scholar looks like, knows and can do. Once
this vision was established, the team developed
a set of tasks that would allow a student to
demonstrate these characteristics, and routed
state and national standards to these tasks. In the
end, the workshops resulted in a set of certicate
requirements as well as a draft of the capstone
performance assessment. Though this assessment
would be rened through several pilot studies,
expert validation, interrater reliability measures,
and the collective genius of several dozen more
educators, the assembled coalition had reached
consensus on certicate requirements and devel-
oped a shared vision of what students would need
to do to be declared an Illinois Global Scholar.
Navigating the Legislative Process
After developing the requirements for a future
certicate, a small team worked with the Illinois
State Board of Education to draft a two-page bill.
Though the legislative rules would eventually
total over 40 pages, limiting the initial bill to two
pages was strategic in that it narrowed the bill
to its essential elements, allowing legislators to
focus on the substance rather than the minutia of
implementation.
With a draft bill created, the team decided
to try to introduce the bill into both the Illinois
Senate and the House of Representatives,
allowing two opportunities for the bill to pass.
Many legislators responded to our sponsor-
ship requests with polite rejection. However,
our experience of coalition building left us
undeterred, and we quickly found legislators
to sponsor a bill in each chamber of the Illinois
General Assembly. With sponsors established, we
mobilized our coalition and began to systemati-
cally seek the support of all of the legislators
in our state. We made phone calls, sent emails,
solicited and wrote institutional letters of sup-
port, and even met many legislators in person.
To aid this effort, we created a well-designed
one-page fact sheet that explained the value the
certicate would have to different constituencies
and interests as well as an FAQ sheet to respond