56 | Social Education | January/February 2023
Social Education 87 (1)
©2023 National Council for the Social Studies
Illinois Global Scholar:
A Story of Teacher Advocacy
for Student Transformation
Seth Brady and Randy Smith
This past September, not long after school started,
NPR’s Morning Edition aired an interview about a
groundbreaking media literacy education law in
Illinois. I (Seth) was listening in the car on my way
to school. This rst-in-the-nation policy requires
all high school students to receive instruction in
media literacy. Among other requirements, stu-
dents must learn to analyze and evaluate media
messages, distinguish fact from opinion, and
reect upon media consumption and production.
A couple of minutes into the piece, host Rachel
Martin asked the professor being interviewed “Are
high school students responsive to this? I mean,
do they get it?” The tone of the question seemed
to tilt Martin’s hand: she appeared skeptical.
Sitting alone in my school’s parking lot, I found
myself answering her question out loud: “I know
at least one high school student who gets it!”
The one high school student I knowgets it
is Braden Hajer. Braden was a student in my
capstone class back in the days of lockdown and
Zoom school. Two years before the NPR interview
aired (almost to the day) Braden had posed a
question that would lead him to draft the legisla-
tion now being discussed by two adult profession-
als (see page 61). Braden’s work on the bill wasn’t
an accident or lucky happenstance. Braden’s story
was only possible because of another story of
activism. In that story, a broad coalition driven by
Illinois educators marshaled their time, resources,
and collective wisdom to create the Illinois Global
Scholar Certicate and the powerful model of
inquiry that led Braden and dozens of other stu-
dents to take informed action to effect change.
Telling stories of citizen changemakers high-
lights the impact of ordinary people and reminds
us of the power we hold as citizens in a democ-
racy. Such stories also provide valuable instruction
Seth Brady and Randy Smith, along with Kevin Angell (a
student), speak with Senate Leader and IGS sponsor Kimberly
Lightford aer giving testimony at the Illinois State Capitol.
www.socialstudies.org | 57
on how to wield power for the common good.
Given the numerous challenges teachers currently
face, it is critical to become familiar with stories of
teacher advocacy.
Background of the Illinois Global Scholar
Certicate
The Illinois Global Scholar Certicate awards a
seal of merit, on the state-sanctioned transcript, to
students who demonstrate global competency. To
earn this certicate, students must complete eight
globally-focused courses, participate in globally-
focused service learning, engage in global col-
laboration or dialogue, and complete a capstone
project following the Illinois Global Scholar Inquiry
to Action process. This model requires students to
develop actionable questions addressing a spe-
cic issue, conduct research, connect and receive
feedback from two on-the-ground experts, and
then integrate that feedback into an artifact that is
taken into action to effect change. School districts
opt in to offer the certicate and, with the support
of the Illinois State Board of Education, determine
which curricular and extracurricular activities will
meet the four requirements. Illinois is unique
among states offering global education creden-
tials as it is the only state with a certicate created
by, championed, and managed by volunteer
educators. The educators who drove the certi-
cate forward secured funding, assembled a broad
coalition of stakeholders, drafted legislation, and
mobilized statewide support for the certicate.
The story of Illinois Global Scholar (IGS)
began in 2013 when a handful of educators
(Seth Brady, Cindy Oberle-Dahm, Jon Pazol,
Hina Patel, and Mario Perez) completed
Teachers for Global Classrooms, a fellowship
offered by the U.S. Department of State. This
year-long program equips K-12 teachers with
the skills and knowledge they need to integrate
a global perspective into all subject areas. After
finishing the program and completing a field
experience in one of several partner countries,
teachers are given a mandate to infuse a global
Members of the Illinois Global Scholar Coalition meet to nalize the Illinois Global Scholar Capstone Performance Assessment.
58 | Social Education | January/February 2023
perspective across the curriculum.
Successes and Obstacles
It was with this mandate that we (co-authors Seth
Brady and Randy Smith) began to brainstorm
about what a global education certicate might
look like in our own school district. As this
brainstorming expanded to include teachers in
other school departments, we soon discovered
widespread interest and support. Teachers in
these departments, along with our assistant
principal, formed a loose coalition, and soon we
shared our vision with faculty at the other high
school in our district. By the time we had created
a draft for a district-level certicate, we had easily
hosted more than two dozen meetings, including
several at the district level. With one nal meeting
to go, we expected the certicate to be approved
by the superintendent and then the school board.
Instead, we received a polite “no thank you.
Though difcult to accept initially, the school
district’s answer made sense. Leadership liked the
idea of creating a certicate to recognize global
competence and the potential impact the initiative
might have for students, but had to weigh this
interest against limited time, resources, and fund-
ing. District leaders were already grappling with
several ongoing initiatives and didn’t want to take
up bandwidth by adding one more. Despite the
logic, the rejection was devastating and humbling.
We had gathered together a coalition of educa-
tors who saw value in the certicate and were will-
ing to expend their limited bandwidth to see the
program come to fruition. Why couldn’t district
leaders do the same?
Three weeks after our initial rejection from
our school district, we were awarded three
grants totaling over $30,000 to gather together
stakeholders to develop criteria for a state-level
global education certicate in Illinois. The grants
came from the U.S. Department of State/IREX; the
European Union Center at the University of Illinois
(a U.S. Department of Education Title VI Outreach
Center); and the Longview Foundation, a private
Members of the Illinois Global Scholar Coalition score student work to establish the interrater reliability of the Illinois Global
Scholar Capstone Performance Assessment.
www.socialstudies.org | 59
philanthropic organization committed to expand-
ing global education opportunities across the
country. These organizations provided much more
than funding. They served as partners connecting
us with people, answering our questions, and
providing information about and connections with
states that were developing programs similar to
the one we envisioned.
Building a Coalition
The support of these institutions helped us
build capacity and connected us to a national
network of global educators. With no state-level
global education network, we started with
someone we knew: Dr. Darlene Ruscitti, Regional
Superintendent of Schools for our county. While
we only expected a half-hour meeting, Dr. Ruscitti
enthusiastically embraced the idea and spent
two hours explaining the demographic and geo-
graphic diversity of our state and the importance
of gathering stakeholders that reected this
diversity. She insisted that the certicate should
be accessible to students and districts. She also
mentioned a handful of organizations she felt
would be interested in the certicate we were pro-
posing. After school and occasionally during lunch
hours, we began to contact these organizations
and share our vision. After making several calls,
we developed a specic approach. We began by
describing IGS with a two-minute elevator pitch
about the program, then requested advice, and
nally inquired about who else we should connect
with. We found that this approach honored the
wisdom each person had to offer. The approach
also invited people into our process as thought
partners and allowed us to expand our network
with very few cold calls.
After several months, we managed to engage
several dozen educators, most of the Title VI
Centers in our state, professors and others in
higher education, business leaders, and non-prot
organizations. These stakeholders helped us
see value in the certicate we hadn’t seen. Prior
to making these connections we had seen the
Members of the Illinois Global Scholar Coalition and Dr. Lydia Kyei-Blankson (far le) at a meeting to assess the Capstone
Performance Assessment for interrater reliability.
60 | Social Education | January/February 2023
certicate primarily as a means of forwarding cur-
ricular outcomes and providing rich experiences
for students. After speaking with stakeholders we
came to see the certicate as a means of prepar-
ing a global workforce, as a critical component
of STEM education, as a means to bolster Illinois
agriculture and agribusiness sectors, as a means
of attracting foreign investment to our state, as an
opportunity to build community and foster toler-
ance, and much more.
In addition to expanding the purpose and
appeal of the certicate, coalition building also
connected us with people such as Shawn Healy,
Donna McCaw, and Mary O’Brian who had the
expertise needed to help us with policy creation,
workshop organization, and assessment.
Reaching Consensus
The people we engaged to help with policy, work-
shops and assessment were critical to harnessing
the energy of the 50+ stakeholders who attended
Illinois Global Scholar workshops. The goal of
these workshops was to reach consensus on
certicate requirements and begin the process of
developing a robust assessment of global compe-
tency. Though these goals would be reached, the
process took time and effort as questions related
to equity, access, and rigor surfaced during work-
shop deliberations. Would the certicate require
a minimum grade point average? Would schools
that were less well-resourced be able to admin-
ister the certicate? Could four years of a world
language be required? What were the criteria by
which global courses would be determined?
As members of the coalition grappled with
these questions, a set of core values began to
emerge that came to inform decision making
about the certicate. This consensus building
didn’t mean everyone present got everything they
wanted. For example, prior to the workshops one
of our most important partners, the Illinois State
Board of Education (ISBE) indicated that it would
not support a certicate program that included a
four-year world language requirement because
less than half of the schools in Illinois offered a
fourth-year course. Members of the Illinois Council
of Teaching Foreign Languages strongly objected.
They had hoped that the certicate would expand
world language instruction in our state and were
disappointed with the state Board of Education’s
position.
On the assessment side, workshop attendees
labored to articulate a shared vision of what a
global scholar looks like, knows and can do. Once
this vision was established, the team developed
a set of tasks that would allow a student to
demonstrate these characteristics, and routed
state and national standards to these tasks. In the
end, the workshops resulted in a set of certicate
requirements as well as a draft of the capstone
performance assessment. Though this assessment
would be rened through several pilot studies,
expert validation, interrater reliability measures,
and the collective genius of several dozen more
educators, the assembled coalition had reached
consensus on certicate requirements and devel-
oped a shared vision of what students would need
to do to be declared an Illinois Global Scholar.
Navigating the Legislative Process
After developing the requirements for a future
certicate, a small team worked with the Illinois
State Board of Education to draft a two-page bill.
Though the legislative rules would eventually
total over 40 pages, limiting the initial bill to two
pages was strategic in that it narrowed the bill
to its essential elements, allowing legislators to
focus on the substance rather than the minutia of
implementation.
With a draft bill created, the team decided
to try to introduce the bill into both the Illinois
Senate and the House of Representatives,
allowing two opportunities for the bill to pass.
Many legislators responded to our sponsor-
ship requests with polite rejection. However,
our experience of coalition building left us
undeterred, and we quickly found legislators
to sponsor a bill in each chamber of the Illinois
General Assembly. With sponsors established, we
mobilized our coalition and began to systemati-
cally seek the support of all of the legislators
in our state. We made phone calls, sent emails,
solicited and wrote institutional letters of sup-
port, and even met many legislators in person.
To aid this effort, we created a well-designed
one-page fact sheet that explained the value the
certicate would have to different constituencies
and interests as well as an FAQ sheet to respond
www.socialstudies.org | 61
to legislator questions and pushback. Though we
would continue to receive a few polite rejections,
we slowly built up the number of sponsors and
succeeded in gaining support for the bill from
inuential legislators on both sides of the aisle,
including members of both party’s leadership.
In preparation for committee hearings, we asked
our coalition to create lists of stakeholders who
would be willing to le witness slips and found
students eager to give testimony. Once committee
hearings were scheduled, we sent out encourag-
ing emails with detailed instructions on how to le
witness slips. We took students to the state capitol
to testify and meet with legislators directly. When
the bill passed, we had a total of 39 sponsors
across both chambers and both political parties.
In the end, of the 165 votes cast, 160 legislators
voted for the bill, with only a handful of nays.
Implementation and Transformation
After the governor signed the bill, our school
district, which had originally passed on our
proposal, became the rst district in the state
to adopt the Illinois Global Scholar Certicate.
In the course of two years, we had overcome
several obstacles, built a broad coalition, reached
consensus on requirements, and managed
to move a bill through the Illinois Legislature.
And once this was achieved, we ended where
we began: with students. Students in our own
school, some of whom played a role in the bill’s
success, enrolled in a capstone course intent
on earning the certicate. Months before, the
assessment group had unanimously agreed that
the goal of the Illinois Global Scholar Capstone
Assessment should be “transformation.” I
remember privately thinking that this goal was
much too ambitious for a single course. However,
the collective genius of educators resulted in a
powerful new performance task now referred to
as the Inquiry to Action Process.
Students begin the Inquiry to Action Process by
developing an actionable question addressing a
global issue in a specic context. They then launch
an investigation and conduct research that seeks
to identify the wide range of factors that contrib-
ute to a given issue. Students then draft an artifact
and then rene the artifacts in light of feedback
from on-the-ground experts who students them-
selves must locate. Finally, students take these arti-
facts into action in domestic and global contexts
to effect measurable change.
In the very rst year the Illinois Global Scholar
Certicate was available, one student created an
inquiry question that sought to determine the
best way to end a future Ebola outbreak. This
question resulted in her coding a choose-your-
own-adventure game in which the player is a
Doctors Without Borders doctor experiencing an
Ebola outbreak. Rooted in the student’s research
on Ebola, the player of the game has to make
choices and experience the consequences of
their choices. Having had this game reviewed by
volunteers and Doctors Without Borders doctors
in Sierra Leone, the game was deployed in class-
rooms in Sierra Leone, with a pre-test and post-
test demonstrating that the playing of the game
deepened understanding of Ebola and positively
changed attitudes and risk behaviors related to
Ebola. Another student, who just wanted ”to do a
project on fashion” ended up becoming engaged
in the Bangladeshi labor movement and created
Braden’s story
Bradens research into the history of misinformation resulted in his mission to do everything he could to help students
navigate the new media environment he (and we) nd ourselves in. Aer struggling with how to best eect change, he
draed a bill and then contacted Peter Adams from the News Literacy Project and Bill Adair, professor at Duke and
founder of Politifact, and requested their feedback. Using their input, he made adjustments to his dra bill, and then
contacted legislators who agreed to sponsor the bill. Next, Braden gave testimony to the Illinois General Assembly,
convinced more legislators to sponsor the bill, and launched a campaign to get ordinary citizens to complete witness
slips. In the end, the bill passed and Illinois became the rst state to pass mandatory media literacy education. ough
the NPR coverage made no mention of the eorts, the facts are clear: mandatory media literacy education would not
exist in Illinois without the civic activism of a high school student. He certainly “gets it.
62 | Social Education | January/February 2023
a Public Service Announcement in the Bangla
language to help an NGO teach Bangladeshis
that joining a labor movement is legal. Future
students would go on to deploy disability edu-
cation modules for Afghan teachers, develop
an evaluative tool for international service
trips, and create a high-level graphic novel to
address suicide in Japan. In these examples
and many others, the powerful inquiry process
developed as part of Illinois Global Scholar
Certificate transformed students into globally-
engaged changemakers.
Lessons Learned
Though there are dozens more projects that
could be highlighted, what we realized over
time is that the process we were asking stu-
dents to go through was more or less the same
process we had gone through to create the cer-
tificate. We started with a question: How could
global education opportunities be improved for
Illinois students? We engaged in an investiga-
tive process to determine certificate require-
ments. We worked with a broad coalition of
expert professionals and revised the certificate
in light of their feedback. And we took action to
effect change. As is the case with students who
pursue the IGS certificate, our process came
with many lessons learned that are valuable to
educator-advocates:
1. Vision-Advice-Connection
When communicating with potential
stakeholders, be sure to clearly express
your vision, ask for their advice, and
never forget to ask with whom else you
might connect. This formula is a powerful
way to engage people with your idea
and coalition build. Asking for advice
honors the expertise and experience of
the person being asked and invites them
to add to the vision expressed. This in
turn helps build relationships and sets
the stage to inquire about other people
with similar interests.
2. Build a Broad Coalition
When considering advocacy, spend time
building a broad coalition. Though this
takes time, the process of coalition build-
ing around a particular idea or policy
can help vet and improve a proposed
policy or idea. This not only builds buy-in
within the coalition, it prepares coalition
members to address future pushback
or objections. Where legislation is
concerned, members of a coalition can
be called upon to contact legislators, le
witness slips, or garner support.
3. Consider the district or state as a
whole
How will a proposed piece of legislation
help all of the stakeholders involved
(students, educators, or schools) in your
district or state? What burdens might the
legislation place on citizens, students,
educators or students in your district or
state? To what extent does a policy lead
to shared prosperity for all stakeholders?
4. Consider situating yourself as a
peacebuilder
Social studies teachers often nd
themselves navigating a wide variety
of student perspectives and are well
aware of the fact that political labels
rarely encapsulate the complexity of any
individual person. Rather than assume
that a particular issue will be embraced
or rejected by one party or another, con-
sider seeing yourself as a peacebuilder
who seeks to understand the diverse
needs and interests of each individual
legislator and the constituents they serve.
5. Develop a communication strategy
Different stages of advocacy require
different methods of communication
and different media. Be ready with a
one-minute, three-minute, and ve-
minute “elevator speech” and prepare
a one-page information sheet that
presents the idea or policy, addresses
the most common concern or criticism,
and explains how the policy will benet
various groups of people.
www.socialstudies.org | 63
6. Access and equity are critical in
education
Equitable access to educational pro-
grams is critical to success. As such,
create policies and ideas that address
barriers to participation.
Conclusion
Educators occupy a unique position in their com-
munities. They stand at the intersection of local,
state, and federal policy and are entrusted to pre-
pare students to become active engaged citizens
in their communities. Though equipping teachers
with the skills and knowledge needed to advocate
may take teachers outside the traditional scope
of their duties, educators have a responsibility to
act for the common good and teach their students
to do the same. Given the challenges that face
our communities, nation, and world, becoming
advocates for students and schools is perhaps the
highest calling of both citizenship and the teach-
ing profession.
Seth Brady is an award-winning educator from
Naperville Central High School in Naperville,
Illinois, where he has taught for the past 
years. In addition to organizing the coalition of
stakeholders to create a global education certicate
for Illinois high school students, Seth serves as
project director for Illinois Global Scholar. He
is an author of the C Framework for Religious
Studies and a strong advocate for religious literacy,
restorative practice, and inquiry.
Randy Smith has been an educator at Naperville
Central since . His primary courses are
AP Human Geography, AP US Government
and Politics, and American Government. He is
the Congressional Debate Team Head Coach
and serves during the summer as a reader or
table leader for the College Board in AP US
Government. He loves the way in which his
central role in creating the Illinois Global Scholar
certicate brought about a dynamic fusion of his
interests and passions, and yet more importantly,
has presented unique opportunities for dynamic
enrichment for students.
Interested in discussing advocacy or Illinois Global Scholar?
Email [email protected] or visit www.global-illinois.org
e Teachers’ Institute is FREE!!
Participants only pay their round-trip travel expenses to Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Learn in depth about Islamic faith, practice, history, and culture from university-level scholars.
Engage with curricular resources to teach about Islam in social studies, religion, or world history classes.
Utilize Institute materials, and collaborate on a final project that lends itself to immediate use in the classroom!
WWhile the focus of this Institute is on secondary education, we accept and consider applications from a diversity
of professionals.
Dar al Islam provides books, supplementary materials, access to our online knowledge base, on-site room and
board, and transportation between our campus in Abiquiu and the Albuquerque International Airport.
Apply Now! Applications are accepted on a rolling basis until May 15th with priority given to those submitted by
April 1st.
For more information visit www.daralislam.org.
F
For questions, contact us at [email protected].
Understanding Islam and Muslims
Dar al Islam is pleased to offer our 34th annual residential Teachers’ Institute
July 9 - July 22, 2023 in Abiquiu, New Mexico