by over 70% of the floor area in the market paying voluntarily to have an independent
assessment of their building by 2011, prior to the program becoming mandatory.
This alignment of energy performance with building valuations has had a profound
impact on the energy efficiency of landlords in the Australian office market, with the
majority of institutional property owners pledging to achieve ratings above 4.5 stars, or
emissions approximately 50% below the median emissions of the 1999 baseline. By
2015, the majority of these portfolios have achieved this, and has been reflected in the
performance across the whole building stock, with the median rating improving from 2.5
stars in 1999 to 4.2 stars in 2014, and capture of approximately 90% of the Australian
office building stock.
The adoption by building tenants has been considerably lower than that for landlords.
Anecdotal feedback indicates that this is due to less tangible alignment with core
business (property valuations are tangible for landlords) and energy representing a
smaller portion of business costs – of the order of 10% of rental for landlords, but under
1% of square meter equivalent wage costs for tenants. Further, adoption in building
classes with a poorer split between owner and user energy consumption has been poor,
a reflection of reluctance to report on consumption outside of the operational control of
the reporting entity.
The Australian experience has shown strong effect of measurement based rating tools in
driving market emissions, provided the market structure is supportive of utilising
performance ratings to inform purchasing decisions, and that complementary policy is
provided to assist the market valuation of high performing buildings.
From Energy Star to Tenant Star: the US experience
Adam Sledd, Institute for Market Transformation US
In fall 2015, US Congress passed the Energy Efficiency Improvement Act of 2015, a
small but important bipartisan bill focused on improving efficiency in U.S. buildings. For
many in the real estate industry, the most notable portion of the bill directed the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to
create a tenant-focused version of EPA’s very successful Energy Star for buildings
program. The new initiative, which the bill gives EPA the option of calling Tenant Star, is
being hailed by a wide range of industry stakeholders as the next great tool for driving
energy savings in commercial buildings. It’s not hard to see the allure of Tenant Star.
Energy Star’s Portfolio Manager is already successfully helping more than 400,000
commercial buildings measure, track, assess and report their energy and water use. And
last year Energy Star expanded its reach to multifamily housing with the help of Fannie
Mae. To test the program’s effectiveness, in 2012 EPA conducted a study of 35,000
buildings. The results showed that organizations benchmarking whole building energy
data (PDF) consistently in Portfolio Manager achieved average energy savings of 7
percent over three years. The key words there, however, are "whole building." As
property owners have become more sophisticated about managing energy use in their
buildings, the composition of that usage has changed. Plug and process loads, which
include tenant space items such as refrigerators, computers and printers, are widely
considered the fastest-growing category of energy use in office buildings. So while base
building systems such as boilers and chillers are getting more efficient, tenant spaces
may offset savings by ignoring efficiency in their space design and occupant behavior.
Owners who invest millions of dollars to have high-performing buildings are rightfully
worried that inefficient tenant spaces are, to some extent, undoing their good work.
Tenant Star could help secure investments in high-performing buildings by providing
owners with a federally funded engagement platform to present to prospective tenants.
The program’s savings potential is staggering when considering only the roughly 6 billion
square feet of existing leased office space in the U.S., and estimating about $1.10 per
square foot for lights and plug and process loads, just 15 percent savings in tenant
spaces would be worth almost a billion dollars in avoided energy costs — and that’s not
counting potential savings for retail, education and other types of tenants. Despite the
13