PROGRAM SPONSOR ALERT 21-01: Individual Development Plan for Documentation of Educator Preparation during
COVID-19 Page 2
Use of a Common Name/Terminology
Induction program leaders have noted that, in some cases, induction candidates are unaware of
the existence of their IDP and/or do not understand its relevance or importance to their
induction experience as they enter the profession. One of the challenges noted by teacher
induction program leaders is that different preliminary program institutions call this document
by different names. This causes confusion on the part of candidates when asked for this
document by induction programs. To maintain consistency and lessen confusion using the term
“Individual Development Plan” will help ensure that candidates recognize the terminology and
will be more likely to make this document available to their induction program. Teacher
Induction program leaders recommend that all preliminary programs ensure that their
candidates understand what the IDP is, how it is used, and the vital and intentional role it plays
in the learning to teach continuum for candidates moving from preservice to induction.
Common Components to Include in the IDP
To date, there has been a wide range of information included in the IDP across institutions.
Program leaders have suggested that these documents may be more useful and informative if
there were certain components that were uniform across all. Ensuring that these common
components are included in all IDPs is particularly important at this time given the unique
circumstances posed by COVID-19, where candidate experiences in preliminary programs may
differ in significant ways. These common components can be found in Appendix A to this PSA
and include contact information for the preliminary preparation program; identification of the
credential for which the candidate has been recommended; the candidate’s program
requirements; the candidate’s level of practice; and acknowledgments.
When developing the IDP collaboratively with the candidate, the program supervisor, and the
district employed supervisor, the preliminary program should also ensure that the IDP includes
critical information so that the induction program can provide appropriate support to the
induction candidate in the areas of the Teaching Performance Expectations (TPEs). This is
especially critical for candidates who may not have had as much exposure to each of the TPE
areas during his/her preparation program due to parameters associated with COVID-19.
Included as Appendix B of this PSA is a chart identifying the TPEs in which candidates may have
received strong preparation given the circumstances surrounding P-12 education due to the
COVID-19 pandemic and the TPEs where candidates may need additional support in their first
years of teaching. It is recommended that preliminary preparation programs refer to the chart
to provide appropriate information about the candidates exiting their program so that the
induction program will know what supports are likely to be needed by the candidate as they
begin their teaching career.
Preliminary programs should work closely with their partner induction programs to determine if
there are any additional considerations for inclusion in the IDP. Including more specificity in
each candidate’s IDP ensures that candidates receive more robust mentoring and support in
the appropriate areas and will experience continued growth in the teaching profession. Given
the range of candidate preparation experiences across the state, the IDP has increasing