Updated November 2020
Student Conduct and Community Responsibilities
A Unit of the Dean of Students Office
Illinois State University
Resources for Faculty and Instructors
Academic Integrity
Student Services Building, room 120
(309) 438-8621
SCCRHelp@IllinoisState.edu
https://deanofstudents.illinoisstate.edu/conflict/
Academic Integrity at Illinois State University .............................................................................. 1
The Role of SCCR in Academic Integrity Cases ........................................................................ 1
10 Principles of Academic Integrity ........................................................................................... 2
Overview of SCCR Processes for Handling Academic Integrity Violations ............................. 6
Submitting an Academic Dishonesty Report .............................................................................. 7
Full Code of Student Conduct Process for Academic Integrity Violations .............................. 15
Academic Integrity Policy at Illinois State University ............................................................. 17
Most Common Instances of Academic Dishonesty at ISU ....................................................... 18
Frequent Sanctions/Outcomes for Academic Dishonesty at Illinois State University ............. 19
Fundamental Values of Academic Integrity ............................................................................. 19
Tips for Discouraging Plagiarism from Eastern Michigan University ..................................... 20
Academic Integrity Syllabus Statements .................................................................................. 21
Additional Resources and Web Links (Academic Integrity) .................................................... 22
1
Academic Integrity at Illinois State University
Academic integrity is expected from students in all academic endeavors. The Code of Student
Conduct states: “Students are expected to be honest in all academic work. A student’s placement
of their name on any academic exercise shall be regarded as assurance that the work is the result
of the student’s own thought, effort, and study” (pg. 6).
This section is designed to assist faculty and instructors in addressing the issue of academic
integrity proactively, as well as to better understand the procedures and processes that occur
when there is an alleged violation of academic integrity.
The Role of SCCR in Academic Integrity Cases
SCCR’s role in academic integrity cases is to facilitate an educational process that seeks to
provide a fair review of the evidence/information and apply appropriate educational sanctions
when necessary. Because of this, SCCR staff has a responsibility both to the faculty member
who brings forward accusations as well as to the accused student(s).
Because SCCR does not conduct a full investigation it is essential for faculty and instructors to
make all appropriate inquiries and collect all necessary information/documentation before
referring the case to us. When appropriate, faculty should identify potential witnesses who would
be willing to make statements in support of the complaint. Please know, you are welcome and
encouraged to contact our office while you are in the process of investigations for advice and/or
further information about what information will be necessary to move forward.
We acknowledge the time and energy you put into reviewing, documenting, and referring
instances of academic dishonesty. We also understand these matters are often difficult and
frustrating. Please know, SCCR staff are helping resolve a serious allegation and will attempt to
do so in the fairest and most equitable manner possible. We are bound by a dual responsibility to
the faculty member, and the accused student(s). We help ensure due process and find resolutions
that work for all parties.
Overview of SCCR Processes for Handling Academic Integrity Violations
Academic integrity is central to the mission of Illinois State University. As an institution of
higher education, when we confer a degree, we are saying we are confident in the competence of
the student in their field of study. When students do not earn these degrees with honesty and
integrity, ISU cannot make that claim. We also have a duty to educate, to ensure students lacking
these skills have an opportunity to learn them. Faculty members are strongly encouraged to
report all instances of academic dishonesty to Student Conduct and Community Responsibilities.
Faculty members retain authority to determine grade penalties, and the official University
disciplinary response comes through the student conduct process. Please know, you are always
welcome to consult with SCCR staff, at any point in this process.
• Keep the original copy of the assignment; if the student asks for a copy, provide them
with a duplicated copy only.
• Do not assign a grade or grade penalty to the assignment until you have met with the
student and determined whether the student accepts responsibility.
• Privately inform the student that you have a concern with the assignment and would like
to discuss it. If more than one student is involved each should be informed, and met with,
individually.
• Set the meeting time for when you are both available to review the assignment together
(could be in person, or via Zoom). The meeting should give you a sense for how the
student constructed the assignment, the materials used, how many drafts were written,
how many papers the student has written before, etc.
o If appropriate, request that the student bring in their rough work and reference
materials to the meeting; this may help you determine the root of the problem.
o If you have identified the sources yourself, have them available for reference
during the meeting.
• If the student acknowledges committing academic dishonesty, the faculty member may
then assign a grade penalty; the incident, along with all accompanying information
should then be forwarded to SCCR for disciplinary review. The faculty member may
include a recommended course of action and/or resolution to SCCR, but any final
determination is left up to SCCR staff.
• If the student denies committing academic dishonesty, but the faculty member is
convinced otherwise, any grade penalty should be put on hold, and the matter must be
forwarded to SCCR.
• During the student conduct process, the faculty member will be contacted by SCCR staff
to review and discuss the information. Any attempt to administratively resolve the
situation will be relayed to the faculty member. If a hearing is necessary, the faculty
member will be notified of the date, time, and location of the hearing and is expected to
participate.
• If at the conclusion of the disciplinary process the student is found responsible for an act
of academic dishonesty, the faculty member may then apply an appropriate grade penalty.
• If at the conclusion of the disciplinary process the student is found not responsible for an
act of academic dishonesty, the faculty member is strongly advised not to impose an
academic penalty on this basis. A student can file a grievance if the faculty member
chooses to invoke an academic penalty for an act of dishonesty when a student has not
been found responsible.
Submitting an Academic Dishonesty Report
To submit a report of academic dishonesty, go to: www.deanofstudents.illinoisstate.edu/conflict.
In the navigation panel on the left, select “Report a Problem” and select the link for instructors
reporting academic dishonesty.
This will direct you to the reporting form.
Click the drop down, and select “Academic Dishonesty Report”
Fill out the requested information.
In these instances, you are the reporting party. We need your name, email, and the best number
to reach you.
For date/time of incident, please indicate the date that you discovered the academic dishonesty.
We use this same form for lots of incident types, for location of the incident, please enter your
course (i.e. BSC 101). If you would like, you can include the section number.
When entering the individuals involved, please include UID numbers whenever possible. This
ensures we contact the correct students. If you want to include their email addresses, you are
welcome to do that. This is the section you will also list any witnesses that may be able to
provide additional information.
In the incident description, you will write out a narrative of what happened. You can include as
much detail as you feel is necessary. Please note, the student has the right to request the incident
description, so be mindful of what/how you enter information here. For example, I wouldn’t
want to say, “Another professor told me that Jen cheats on exams, so even though I didn’t see her
copying another student’s work, I know she did – she is a liar and should be kicked out of
school.”
BSC 101, section 4
8/25/2020
01
30
pm
You will also attach documents in this section. We ask that you include, minimally, your course
syllabus and the assignment/exam in question. If you found the websites, or source material, if
you include that it is helpful. You can also include links to source material in the incident
description.
The final section of the incident reporting form is specific to academic dishonesty reports.
As outlined in the Code there are a few specific things we need to know. First, were you able to
have a conversation (via email, over the phone, in person, etc.) with the student about your
concerns? If not, please let us know what happened. For example, did you email the student, but
they didn’t respond; was it the end of the semester and you weren’t able to send them an email…
whatever the case may be, please provide some details and context.
What grade penalty are you applying? The drop-down menu has several options, please select
one.
If you select “other” a text box will come up for you to provide details.
The next question has to do with due process, did the student accept responsibility for the
violation, AND agree to the grade penalty?
In this case, since the students didn’t respond to the instructor, no agreement could be reached.
When you select no, more information is needed. Another example could be if the student
doesn’t think they violated the Code or if they don’t think the grade penalty is fair. Please note,
SCCR does not determine grade penalties – these are completely under the purview of the
instructor. The only exception is if a student is found not responsible for academic dishonesty in
a formal hearing process, then we recommend you don’t impose a grade penalty for academic
dishonesty.
The next step is to make a recommendation for disciplinary action to SCCR staff.
If you select no action, there is still a documentation process that will occur. Additionally, if a
student has related disciplinary history, SCCR may not be able to accept your recommendation.
The last step is to tell the system you are a real person, and click submit.
After submission, you will get a confirmation message:
An SCCR staff member will reach out (usually within 48 hours, depending on volume of
reports), confirming receipt and explaining the next steps in the process.
Full Code of Student Conduct Process for Academic Integrity Violations
The Code of Student Conduct (Code) not only outlines expectations related to student behavior,
but also establishes the basic due process protections that students are afforded.
For your convenience, the information below is reprinted directly from the Specialized Rules
section of the Code. SCCR has recently changed our name from Student Conduct and Conflict
Resolution to Student Conduct and Community Responsibilities to reflect the addition of off-
campus programs and services to our unit. At this time, the Code (as outlined below) uses the
previous name of the unit.
Academic Integrity Cases
Issues of academic integrity are paramount to the University. A scholar’s integrity is the key to
academic credibility, and a degree conferred by the University is an inherent testament to that
scholar’s credibility. As such, when a student is alleged to have committed academic dishonesty,
there are two issues at stake; any grade or credit issue attached to that course or requirement, and
the relationship between the student and the institution. Therefore, faculty are strongly
encouraged to report all instances of academic dishonesty to SCCR, with the recognition that
faculty members retain jurisdiction over any academic penalties related to that course and/or
activity that might be imposed.
With respect to the handling of academic integrity cases:
a) Faculty members who discover academic dishonesty should meet with the student as
soon as possible to review the allegation. Prior to this meeting, faculty members are
encouraged to contact SCCR for consultation.
b) If the student acknowledges academic dishonesty and the faculty member is satisfied that
the incident has been resolved:
i. The faculty member will discuss the academic penalty to be applied and/or the
reparation required of the student. Faculty members should adhere to the grade
penalty policy, if any, noted in an appropriate syllabus. Faculty members without
such a policy, or where such a policy would not be applicable, should develop
academic penalties consistent with the nature of the dishonesty.
ii. The faculty member are strongly encouraged to complete the electronic referral
process for academic dishonesty and submit this referral to SCCR, along with
recommendations for appropriate sanctions, recommendations for no sanctions, or
a request for a restorative conference for the parties to devise their own sanctions.
A SCCR case manager will review the case and the recommendation.
iii. If the student does not have previous academic dishonesty violations and is
otherwise in good disciplinary standing with the University, the case manager can
accept the faculty member’s recommendation of no sanction, or a faculty
member’s request for a restorative conference.
iv. If the student has previous violations for academic dishonesty or is otherwise not
in good disciplinary standing with the University, the case must be referred to the
formal conduct process as outlined in Section VIII.A). Note that a faculty member
requesting a restorative conference may still have that conference granted if the
student can resolve the inactive sanction in the case management conference.
v. If a faculty member recommends formal conduct action and sanctions, the case
will be referred for a case management conference, with the faculty member
serving as a complainant if needed.
c) If the student denies the allegation of academic dishonesty or if the faculty member
believes that the severity of the conduct may warrant a suspension or dismissal from the
University:
i. The faculty member will complete the electronic referral process for academic
dishonesty and submit this referral to SCCR. This submission should contain
copies of all information to be utilized in the student conduct process, including
the names of all parties involved. Note that the student will receive access to all
information provided.
ii. A SCCR case manager shall conduct a case management conference with the
student, as outlined in Section VIII.A), with the faculty member serving as the
complainant.
iii. If the case manager and the student can reach a resolution, the case manager will
consult with the faculty member to review the proposed outcome. If the outcome
is satisfactory to all involved parties, a decision letter will be generated, and the
case will be resolved.
iv. If the student and the case manager cannot resolve the case, or if the faculty
member does not support the proposed outcome, the case will be referred to the
University Hearing Panel for resolution. In the event of a hearing, the faculty
member will be provided with the rights of a complainant (see Section VII.B).
Cases resolved during summer session will be referred to administrative hearings.
d) It is strongly recommended that faculty members withhold the imposition of an academic
penalty in any cases where the student is contesting the allegation. In cases where final
grades are being awarded, a grade of “Incomplete” should be assigned pending the
outcome of the student conduct process. If a faculty member imposes an academic
penalty and a student is found not in violation of the allegation, the student may have
grounds for appealing the penalty through the Office of the Provost.
Pages 27-29 of the Code of Student Conduct
Academic Integrity Policy at Illinois State University
Code of Student Conduct, Section VI.A.1.
A. University Values and Expectations
Behavior that violates the Code includes, but is not limited to, the following regulations.
1. Academic Dishonesty
Students are expected to be honest in all academic work. A student’s attachment of their name on
any academic exercise shall be regarded as assurance that the work is the result of the student’s
own thought, effort, and study.
Violations include such behavior as:
a) Possessing or utilizing any means of assistance (books, notes, papers, articles, third
parties, etc.) to complete any assignment, quiz, or examination unless specifically
authorized by the instructor. Students are prohibited from conversation or other
communication in examinations except as authorized by the instructor.
b) Acting with the intent to deceive the person in charge, such as falsifying data or sources,
providing false information, etc.
c) Plagiarizing. For the purpose of this policy, plagiarism is the unacknowledged
appropriation of another’s work, words, or ideas in any themes, outlines, papers, reports,
speeches, computer programs, artwork, musical scores, performance, or other academic
work, regardless of intent. This includes all forms of intellectual property that can be
copyrighted, patented, or trademarked, whether published or unpublished. Students must
ascertain from the instructor in each course the appropriate means of documentation
and/or attribution.
d) Submitting the same paper for more than one University course or academic requirement
without the prior approval of the instructors. A student may only submit an assignment
once during their affiliation with the University unless provided explicit permission of the
instructors.
e) Willfully giving or receiving unauthorized or unacknowledged assistance on any
assignment. This may include the reproduction and/or dissemination of test materials.
Both parties to such collusion are considered responsible.
f) Substituting for another student in any academic assignment.
g) Being involved in the unauthorized collection, distribution advertisement, solicitation, or
sale of term papers, research papers, or other academic materials completed by a third
party.
In cases of group assignments, unless otherwise indicated by the instructor, all parties to the
assignment are responsible for the submission of any final product, and bear responsibility for
the integrity of the product. Students participating in group projects may be held responsible for
the actions of other group members unless it can be established that a group member was not
aware, and reasonably could not have been aware, of any material that violates University
expectations.
Academic integrity expectations apply to all forums used for the collection and dissemination of
knowledge, including in the classroom, written and electronic assignments, online participation,
field work, and publications.
For the purpose of this policy, it should be noted that the University holds graduate students to a
higher standard given the academic rigor of graduate programs and the fact that students in
graduate programs are already degreed students. As such, graduate students may face more
severe levels of sanctioning for academic misconduct and may also face repercussions in their
academic departments and assistantships.
Pages 6-7 of the Code of Student Conduct
Most Common Instances of Academic Dishonesty at ISU
The most frequent violations of the Code related to academic dishonesty are typically those
involving a lack of knowledge or understanding around academic writing. While less common,
we do also see instances in which students are intentionally dishonest.
Common types of academic dishonesty:
• Poor paraphrasing
• Lack of in-text citations
• Group work vs. working together
o For example: students can work together, but turn in their own assignments, vs.
students working as a group and turning in one assignment.
• Using notes without permission while in the testing center
• Looking up answers on Google while taking tests online or in lab sections
• Looking at or using phones/smartwatches during exams
Frequent Sanctions/Outcomes for Academic Dishonesty at Illinois State University
While each incident and student involved are treated as individuals, we do have general
guidelines around sanctioning for academic dishonesty. Typically, if a student does not have any
disciplinary history, and is involved in unintentional academic dishonesty violations, we issue a
censure and educational outcomes. The educational portion is designed to address the lack of
knowledge, to provide the information necessary for the student not to have a similar incident in
the future. This could be an online workshop about recognizing and avoiding plagiarism,
completing paraphrasing exercises with feedback from SCCR staff, or attending a workshop
through the Visor Center. When we have a student with disciplinary history that is related, or if
the academic dishonesty was intentional, we typically start at disciplinary probation. The student
is still assigned an educational outcome. We may use any of the above, and would likely add a
research or reflection paper, or have the student write a paper exploring ethical standards in the
workplace (related to their field of student/career field) and their decision-making, or another
project that focuses on their values and their behaviors.
Fundamental Values of Academic Integrity
Second Edition (2013) edited by T. Fishman, International Center for Academic Integrity.
https://www.academicintegrity.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Fundamental-Values-2014.pdf
“Many teachers, students, and administrators embrace the principles of academic integrity
because they know that the goals of teaching, learning, and research can only be accomplished in
environments in which ethical standards are upheld.” (p. 16).
“The International Center for Academic Integrity defines academic integrity as a commitment to
five fundamental values: honesty, trust, fairness, respect, and responsibility. We believe that
these five values, plus the courage to act on them even in the face of adversity, are truly
foundational to the academy.” (p. 16).
SCCR’s philosophy aligns with these fundamental values. As your partner in educating students,
our role is to hold students accountable when they do not uphold the expectations of their
instructors and the University. We encourage you to frame conversations with students around
values and ethics. During a sanctioning process we help the student see and make meaning of the
connections between ethical behaviors, their values, and how that plays in the workplace (after
graduation).
Tips for Discouraging Plagiarism from Eastern Michigan University
The following information was taken from Eastern Michigan University’s Research Guides
(Plagiarism for Educators) found at https://guides.emich.edu/c.php?g=187953&p=1241353 and
retrieved on September 10, 2020. Adaptations, synthesis, clarification, and edits to make
applicable to ISU were made. Additional references can be found under “resources and web-
links”.
While plagiarism cannot be completely prevented, there are some actions that are effective in
discouraging it, or to state it more positively, encouraging the proper use of sources. These
include the establishment of course expectations, the incorporation of syllabus statements
outlining expectations for your discipline and your class, the development of well-designed
assignments, and communication with students on writing techniques and the proper use of
sources in your discipline.
In encouraging honest intellectual effort, it is important to establish a firm but positive classroom
ethos from the first day of class. To be effective, the ethic should have a positive side. Statements
about what is not allowed, no matter how urgently expressed, are far more effective when paired
with what is expected. While it can be tempting to focus on how you will punish or mark down
plagiarism rather than your specific expectations, do not fall into this trap. Once the ethos shifts
to strategic game-playing for points, students will see cheating as a rational choice.
Drawing on published literature, we have developed the following recommendations:
Do’s:
1. State explicitly that the goal of the class is learning, and spell out the various ways that
learning will take place (by listening, reading, discussing, writing, etc.) so that students
are primed to learn in many contexts
2. Repeat #1 throughout the semester and make it true in your own behavior and grading
practices
3. Discuss some of the emotional and intellectual conditions of learning (openness, critical
thought, anxiety, humility, etc.)
4. Ask students to report in some fashion (small group discussions, blogs, journals, etc.) on
their subjective experience of learning
5. Provide rubrics so your grading practices are clear
6. Hand out samples of the kind of work expected
7. Respect your students’ efforts
Things to avoid:
1. Assuming students already know the basics.
2. Giving “gotcha” assignments that test students on trivia to see if they were paying
attention.
3. Stating "no plagiarism" without explaining what you mean in the context of your
discipline and assignments.
4. Giving students the impression that they shouldn’t bother you with elementary or
procedural questions. [We recognize this is likely unintentional, please remember
student’s see you as an authority figure, and often feel intimidated].
5. Suggesting you suspect many students would like to cheat or do cheat in college.
6. Assuming that a student's misuse of sources is necessarily an ethical problem rather than
a lack of education or understanding of expectations.
To minimize student confusion we also recommend:
• Avoiding vague or broad assignments: rather than "discuss x" or "critically review y" try
a more specific question such as "how does x relate to y, and what does this relationship
tell us about our broader question of z?"
• Having students utilize higher-level cognitive skills such as analysis, comparison,
explanation or creative problem solving on assigments.
• Assigning research in stages; correct and return sections or drafts along the way.
• Avoiding weighting a single final assignment as a large percentage of a student’s final
grade [this increases the pressure to do well, and often results in some students taking
shortcuts].
• Giving examples of the kind(s) of research and sources you expect.
• Providing models of acceptable and unacceptable paraphrasing, generalizing, and
referencing.
Academic Integrity Syllabus Statements
It is essential that faculty members cover academic dishonesty with students as part of course
expectations. Including academic integrity in your syllabus is one way to let students know what
is expected. We recommend you define cheating and plagiarism in terms of your course and
discipline; providing examples is always helpful. The most common point of confusion for
students is the difference between group work and working together (unauthorized
collaboration).
The following is an example of a syllabus statement regarding academic integrity that can be
inserted into your course syllabus. In addition to the example below faculty members are
encouraged to explicitly state citation requirements, as well as grade penalties for acts of
dishonesty.
Academic integrity is expected in all classroom endeavors. From the Code of Student Conduct:
“Students are expected to be honest in all academic work. A student’s placement of their name
on any academic exercise shall be regarded as assurance that the work is the result of the
student’s own thought, effort, and study” (pg. 6).
Students who have questions regarding issues of academic dishonesty should refer to the Code of
Student Conduct, which outlines unacceptable behaviors in academic matters. Academic
integrity is an expectation at this University and in this course. Academic integrity should be
practiced in all aspects of your academic work, including during class time, when taking exams,
and as you complete written assignments. I may refer instances of academic dishonesty to
Student Conduct and Community Responsibilities (SCCR) for review. I retain the right to
impose a grade penalty for work that is academically dishonest (up to and including assigning an
F in the course). SCCR will review the matter and may meet with you to discuss the incident and
impose a disciplinary status/educational sanctions to track and prevent the recurrence of
academic dishonesty.
Syllabus Statements Regarding Intellectual Property (Chegg/Quizlet/Etc.)
In the last year, SCCR has received several concerns from faculty regarding students posting
their quiz and exam questions into Quizlet. Through conversations with students, it seems that
many are not aware of the fact that Quizlet is a public resource, and the flashcards they create are
publicly available. SCCR recommends you have a syllabus statement regarding your ownership
of your slides, quiz/test questions and other course materials.
For information on Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) go to
https://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf.
Quizlet Links:
• Information about how Quizlet responds to DCMA issues https://quizlet.com/dmca
• How to report DCMA issues to Quizlet https://quizlet.com/dmca/request.
• Go to https://quizlet.com/testbank/request to submit a report to Quizlet to have your
materials removed.
Chegg Links:
• Chegg’s Honor Code: https://www.chegg.com/honorcode
• Information from Chegg about copyrights and DCMA https://www.chegg.com/copyright.
• Submitting a takedown request related to DCMA protected materials
https://www.chegg.com/copyright/takedown-request.
• Where to go to ask Chegg to review information and materials posted on their site
https://www.chegg.com/honorcode/investigation-request.
Additional Resources and Web Links (Academic Integrity)
Syllabus Statement Examples:
• Carnegie Mellon University, Eberly Center Teaching Excellence & Educational
Innovation, (2020). https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/academicintegrity/
• Princeton University, the Office of the Dean of the College, (2020).
https://odoc.princeton.edu/resources/sample-course-syllabus-statements-regarding-
academic-integrity
Please note, many references are made to their University specific policies, and should be
updated to reflect your specific course policies and the expectations of ISU.
Center for Teaching, Learning, and Technology (CTLT) at ISU: http://www.teachtech.ilstu.edu/
The Center for Teaching, Learning, and Technology (CTLT) is a multipurpose
interdisciplinary unit dedicated to the advancement of teaching and student learning. The
center's mission is to serve the entire instructional community at Illinois State, other
institutions of higher education in Illinois, and the business sector. CTLT provides
resources to help enhance the teaching of individual members of the instructional
community. CTLT provides literature that is specifically targeted for knowledge on
academic integrity matters. This material can help assist faculty in finding some
additional tips and information.
International Center for Academic Integrity www.academicintegrity.org
The Center for Academic Integrity provides a forum to identify, affirm, and promote the
values of academic integrity among students, faculty, teachers and administrators. This
site has a lot of beneficial information for faculty to utilize. Additionally, they post
weekly blogs on current topics, available at https://academicintegrity.org/blog/.
International Center for Academic Integrity, Syllabi Designed with Integrity in Mind, written by
Courtney Cullen on August 18, 2020. https://www.academicintegrity.org/integrity/syllabi-
designed-with-integrity-in-mind/.
Information on Academic Integrity and International Students (Thoughts and Suggestions) from
NC State University’s Office of Global Engagement. https://global.ncsu.edu/teaching-
international-students/academic-integrity/
Information on Contract Cheating and What Instructors Can Do – University of Wisconsin-
Madison, written by Dr. Tricia Bertram Gallant. https://conduct.students.wisc.edu/contract-
cheating/
NPR Article and Full Audio Interview with Don McCabe (Rutgers University Business School).
Cheating in College is Widespread – But Why?
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128624207/?storyId=128624207
Brent, D. (2006). Using an Academic-Content Seminar to Engage Students with the Culture of
Research. Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 18(1), 29-60.
Harris, R. (2015). Anti-Plagiarism Strategies. http://www.virtualsalt.com/antiplag.htm
Lamoreaux, M., Darnell, K., Sheehan, E., and Tusher, C. (2012). Educating Students about
Plagiarism. Office of Teaching Resources in Psychology. Georgia State University.
http://teachpsych.org/Resources/Documents/otrp/resources/plagiarism/Educating%20Students%
20about%20Plagiarism.pdf
Indiana University Bloomington Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning. (2017).
Designing assignments to encourage integrity.
https://citl.indiana.edu/teaching-resources/academic-integrity/designing-assignments-encourage-
integrity/
Perlman, B., & McCann, L. I. (2004). The first day of class. APS Observer, 17(1).
http://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/the-first-day-of-class
