11
Portfolio Review Rubric
Once you have submitted your portfolio to “concordadmin” via LiveText, it will be distributed to the designated Department of Education faculty members for
review. The Department of Education faculty members will base their review of each section of your portfolio upon the following rubric of standards, provide an
overall evaluation, and leave comments that will be provided to you in your admission status letter.
candidate is
committed to
the belief
that all
students can
learn.
The artifact demonstrates the
candidate’s belief that students
from differing personal and
family backgrounds and with
differing skills, abilities,
perspectives, talents and
interests can learn. The artifact
demonstrates how the candidate
incorporates this knowledge into
teaching and learning to
maximize learning for each
student in the class. The
candidate has referenced/cited
multiple research/evidence to
The artifact demonstrates the
candidate’s belief that students
from differing family backgrounds
and with differing personal skills
and abilities can learn. The
artifact demonstrates how the
candidate uses this knowledge to
maximize learning for individual
learners.
example or description that
supports the candidate’s
belief that all students can
learn. The candidate provides
generalizations that are
partially supported.
candidate is unable to
demonstrate the belief that
all students can learn through
an example or description of
his/her belief. Or, the
candidate simply makes
unsupported generalizations.
Leadership
Through the artifact(s), the
candidate thoughtfully identifies
and describes multiple, examples
of behaviors that provide specific
evidence that dispositions and
potential for teacher leadership
Through the artifact(s), the
candidate identifies and describes
examples of behaviors that
provide evidence that
disposition(s) and potential for
teacher leadership have been
Through the artifact(s), the
candidate describes and
provides an example that
supports the emergence of
disposition(s) and potential
for teacher leadership.
Through the artifact(s), the
candidate selects
disposition(s); however,
description and/or example
does not provide evidence
that disposition(s) has been
demonstrates a
willingness to
accept change
and is open to
The artifact demonstrates
thoughtful consideration of the
complexity and multiple aspects
of a flexible mindset and
openness to implementing new
The artifact demonstrates
multiple perspectives of a flexible
mindset and openness to explore
new ideas.
The artifact demonstrates
one aspect of a flexible
mindset and openness to
new ideas.
The candidate is unable to
demonstrate with an artifact
or through a narrative that
he/she values flexibility and
openness to new ideas.
Description of
Experience
Correlation to
the Standard
Relationship to
Future Teaching
Description of the learning
experience includes multiple,
specific details of the setting, the
context, and the characteristics of
the learner(s).
Correlation to the
Standard/Element and the
learning experience is fully
developed, demonstrating a deep
understanding of the Standard.
Fully describes with multiple,
thoughtful examples how the
experience relates to future
teaching; responds to multiple
prompts for higher level
reflection.
Description of the learning
experience includes sufficient
details of the setting, the context,
and the characteristics of the
learner(s).
Correlation to the Standard and
the learning experience is
relevant and demonstrates a
good understanding of the
Standard.
Describes with thoughtful detail
and at least one example of how
the experience relates to future
teaching with several responses
to prompts.
Description of the learning
experience includes the
required, basic details of the
setting, the context, but may
lack relevant characteristics
of the learner(s).
Correlation to the Standard is
made; however, the
relationship lacks sufficient
understanding.
General description of how
the experience relates to
future teaching with at least
one response to the prompts.
Description includes one or
more of the details, but the
learning experience is
irrelevant or incomplete.
Lacks a correlation to a
relevant Standard.
Vague description of how the
experience relates to future
teaching with no evidence of
reflection.
is receptive to
feedback.
The artifact demonstrates
detailed actions the teacher
candidate has taken to seek out,
reflect and act upon feedback
and provided evidence that the
feedback produced greater
The artifact demonstrates
actions the teacher candidate has
taken to respond to feedback
that led to opportunity for
greater learning.
The artifact demonstrates
that the teacher candidate
has responded favorably to
feedback, although it is
uncertain that the feedback
led to greater learning.
The artifact demonstrates a
time when the teacher
candidate was provided
feedback, but no indication
of response is provided.
hours working
with
children/youth.
Extensive experiences (75 hours
or more) working with
children/youth outside of field
experiences associated with
course work. Experience with
children/youth is in an
instructional setting and/or
includes supervisory
Several experiences (totaling 75
hours) working with
children/youth outside of field
experiences associated with
course work, Experiences include
some time in an instructional
setting.
hours) working with
children/youth outside of
field experiences associated
with course work. Experience
is not in an educational
setting, and direct interaction
with children/youth is
experience working with
children/youth outside of
field experiences associated
with course work, or 100
hours is observational only,
including no direct
interaction with
Praxis Information & Exemption Requirements