OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
the notice of abandonment that would prevent
abandonment. A “savings event” that preserves a
mineral interest can be any of the following:
a. The mineral interest was the subject of a title
transaction filed or recorded in the county
recorder’s office where the land exists.
b. Actual production or withdrawal of minerals
c. The holder of the mineral interest has used
the mineral interest for underground gas
d. The holder of the mineral interest has been
issued a drilling or mining permit and an
affidavit has been filed in the county
recorder’s office that includes the name of
the permit holder, the permit number and
type, and a description of the land affected by
e. An affidavit to preserve the mineral interest
f. A separately listed tax parcel number has
been created for the mineral interest.
Filing a Notice of Failure to File
If the landowner meets the legal requirements for
filing both the notice of intent to abandon minerals
and the affidavit of abandonment and the mineral
holder does not meet the legal requirements for
preserving the mineral interest, the surface land
owner must file a notice of failure to file with the
recorder of each county where the land is located.
The notice of failure to file must contain:
1. A statement that the person filing the notice
is the owner of the surface of the land subject
to the mineral interest and
2. A description of the surface of the land that
is subject to the mineral interest.
3. The statement: “This mineral interest
abandoned pursuant to affidavit of
abandonment recorded in … [insert volume
and page of public record].”
a. The mineral interest is in coal, or in mining
or other rights connected to an interest in
coal. If a mineral interest includes both
coal and other minerals, a landowner may
use the Dormant Minerals Act to declare
abandonment of the other minerals.
b. The mineral interest is held by the federal
or state government or any political
c. An event preventing abandonment occurred
within the 20 years preceding the date on
which a notice of abandonment is filed and
the mineral interest holder timely filed an
affidavit identifying the event. See
“Affidavit of event preventing
abandonment” above for a listing of the
events that prevent abandonment.
Is the Dormant Minerals Act Constitutional?
A common reaction to the Dormant Minerals Act
is that it is unconstitutional because it “takes” a
mineral owner’s property rights. While no one has
challenged the constitutionality of Ohio’s law, the
United States Supreme Court has upheld a similar
law in Indiana. In Texaco v. Short, the Supreme
Court heard a challenge that Indiana’s Mineral
Lapse Act allows a taking of private property
without compensation. The Court rejected the
argument, saying that states have never been
required to compensate owners for the
consequences of their own neglect in protecting
their property. The Court explained that states do
have the power to require performance of
reasonable conditions to retain a property interest,
that Indiana’s Act sufficiently allows mineral
holders to retain their interests by taking
appropriate steps, and that the law sorts out
interests that are no longer being used while
allowing new owners to step in to those interests.
Given the similarity between the laws of Ohio and
Indiana, it is not likely that a constitutional
challenge to Ohio’s Dormant Mineral Act would
The Ohio Dormant Minerals Act Page 3