The Ohio Dormant Minerals Act:
A Process for Addressing Abandoned
Mineral Interests
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
Law Bulletin
OSU EXTENSION AGRICULTURAL & RESOURCE LAW PROGRAM June 2014
T
he Ohio Dormant Mineral
Act provides a process to
address inactive mineral
interests.
A landowner may seek a
declaration that an inactive
mineral interest has been
“abandoned.”
A mineral interest holder must
take action to protect the
mineral estate.
If a mineral interest is legally
deemed “abandoned,” the
landowner who holds title to
the surface estate gains title to
the abandoned mineral estate.
Landowners and mineral
interest holders should
consult an attorney for
assistance with the Dormant
Minerals Act.
Ohio has long been a mineral producing state. Oil and gas production
dating back to the late 1800s led many landowners to sell their mineral
interests, as Ohio law allows a landowner to separate the mineral rights
and transfer those rights to a different owner. For this reason, a
landowner who holds title to the land might not also hold title to the oil,
gas and other minerals beneath the land.
Even where a landowner separated the mineral estate from a property, it is
possible that actual development of the minerals never occurred or that
some activity took place long ago but has since subsided. This situation
can be problematic when there is renewed interest in the mineral
resources. Who has the right to develop a mineral interest that appears to
be inactive or abandoned?
The Ohio General Assembly enacted the Dormant Minerals Act in 1989 to
address this question. The act provides a procedure for declaring in-active
mineral interests “abandoned.” Unless the holder of the mineral rights
takes action to protect the rights, the law declares the rights abandoned
and reunites the minerals with the surface estate. The landowner then
holds title to both the mineral rights and the land.
Procedure for Declaring Abandonment of Mineral Interests
Ohio Revised Code Section 5301.56 provides the process a landowner
must follow to seek abandonment of the mineral interest. Note that this
procedure does not apply to coal resources or to mineral interests held by
the federal or state government or any political subdivision. For all other
separated mineral interests, the landowner must complete the following
steps.
1. Notice of intent to declare a mineral interest abandoned.
The landowner must serve notice of the intent to have the minerals
declared abandoned to each mineral interest holder, including any parties
who succeeded the original mineral holder.
The Ohio Dormant Minerals Act Page 1
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
The notice of intent must include:
a. The names of each holder of the mineral
interest and/or the holder’s successors or
assignees.
b. A description of the land subject to the
mineral interest, including the volume and
page number of the recorded deed or other
recorded instrument.
c. A description of the mineral interest to be
abandoned, including the volume and page
number of the recorded instrument.
d. A statement attesting that none of the events
that would preserve the mineral interest have
occurred within the 20 years immediately
preceding the date the notice was served or
published (see list of events in “affidavit of
event preventing abandonment,” below).
e. A statement that the landowner intends to file
an affidavit of abandonment in the county
recorder’s office at least 30 but not later than
60 days after the date the notice was served
or published.
The landowner must send the notice by certified
mail to the last known address of each mineral
holder and must request a return receipt. If the
landowner cannot obtain an address for the mineral
holder or cannot otherwise serve the notice on the
mineral holder, the landowner must publish the
notice in a newspaper circulated in each county
where the land is located.
2. Affidavit of abandonment
The landowner must next file an affidavit of
abandonment with the county recorder where the
land is located. This filing must occur more than 30
days and less than 60 days after completion of the
notification of intent to declare abandonment. The
affidavit of abandonment must include:
e. A statement declaring that the landowner is
the surface owner of the lands that are
subject to the mineral interest.
a. The volume and page number of the
recorded instrument that established the
mineral interest.
b. A statement that the mineral interest has
been abandoned according to Ohio Revised
Code Section 5301.56(B) and that the
landowner has served notice of the intent to
declare abandonment.
c. The facts that show that the mineral interest
is abandoned.
d. A statement that the landowner served
notice of the affidavit of abandonment
upon the mineral interest holder.
Protecting the Mineral Interest
The holder of a mineral interest who has received
notice of an intent to declare abandonment must
take action to preserve the mineral rights. If the
holder fails to take action, the law will deem the
mineral interest abandoned.
The law provides two options for the mineral
holder who receives notice that the landowner is
seeking abandonment of the mineral interest. In
both cases, the mineral holder must notify the
landowner of the action taken.
1. Affidavit to preserve the mineral interest
The mineral holder may file an affidavit to
preserve the mineral interest no more than 60 days
after receiving the notice of intent to declare
abandonment. The affidavit must contain:
a. A description of the claimed mineral
interest and any recording information
supporting the claim.
b. A declaration of the holder’s intent to
preserve the holder’s rights in the minerals.
2. Affidavit of event preventing abandonment
No more than 60 days after receiving notice, the
mineral holder may file an affidavit stating that an
event occurred during the 20 years preceding the
The Ohio Dormant Minerals Act Page 2
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
the notice of abandonment that would prevent
abandonment. A “savings event” that preserves a
mineral interest can be any of the following:
a. The mineral interest was the subject of a title
transaction filed or recorded in the county
recorder’s office where the land exists.
b. Actual production or withdrawal of minerals
occurred.
c. The holder of the mineral interest has used
the mineral interest for underground gas
storage operations.
d. The holder of the mineral interest has been
issued a drilling or mining permit and an
affidavit has been filed in the county
recorder’s office that includes the name of
the permit holder, the permit number and
type, and a description of the land affected by
the permit.
e. An affidavit to preserve the mineral interest
has been filed.
f. A separately listed tax parcel number has
been created for the mineral interest.
Filing a Notice of Failure to File
If the landowner meets the legal requirements for
filing both the notice of intent to abandon minerals
and the affidavit of abandonment and the mineral
holder does not meet the legal requirements for
preserving the mineral interest, the surface land
owner must file a notice of failure to file with the
recorder of each county where the land is located.
The notice of failure to file must contain:
1. A statement that the person filing the notice
is the owner of the surface of the land subject
to the mineral interest and
2. A description of the surface of the land that
is subject to the mineral interest.
3. The statement: “This mineral interest
abandoned pursuant to affidavit of
abandonment recorded in [insert volume
and page of public record].”
a. The mineral interest is in coal, or in mining
or other rights connected to an interest in
coal. If a mineral interest includes both
coal and other minerals, a landowner may
use the Dormant Minerals Act to declare
abandonment of the other minerals.
b. The mineral interest is held by the federal
or state government or any political
subdivision or agency.
c. An event preventing abandonment occurred
within the 20 years preceding the date on
which a notice of abandonment is filed and
the mineral interest holder timely filed an
affidavit identifying the event. See
“Affidavit of event preventing
abandonment” above for a listing of the
events that prevent abandonment.
Is the Dormant Minerals Act Constitutional?
A common reaction to the Dormant Minerals Act
is that it is unconstitutional because it “takes” a
mineral owner’s property rights. While no one has
challenged the constitutionality of Ohio’s law, the
United States Supreme Court has upheld a similar
law in Indiana. In Texaco v. Short, the Supreme
Court heard a challenge that Indiana’s Mineral
Lapse Act allows a taking of private property
without compensation. The Court rejected the
argument, saying that states have never been
required to compensate owners for the
consequences of their own neglect in protecting
their property. The Court explained that states do
have the power to require performance of
reasonable conditions to retain a property interest,
that Indiana’s Act sufficiently allows mineral
holders to retain their interests by taking
appropriate steps, and that the law sorts out
interests that are no longer being used while
allowing new owners to step in to those interests.
Given the similarity between the laws of Ohio and
Indiana, it is not likely that a constitutional
challenge to Ohio’s Dormant Mineral Act would
be successful.
The Ohio Dormant Minerals Act Page 3
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
Dormant Minerals Act Litigation
The recent increase in shale gas development in Ohio
generated many new court cases regarding the
Dormant Minerals Act. For a listing and other
information on Dormant Minerals Act litigation, visit
the oil and gas law page
of our “law library” on our
website, http://aglaw.osu.edu.
Consulting an Attorney
It is important to consult with an attorney about rights
and obligations under the Dormant Minerals Act. If a
party does not understand the different property
interests or correctly follow the law, the party may
lose his or her property rights. An attorney can help
ensure that a party meets the requirements of the law.
Sources:
Ohio Dormant Minerals Act, Ohio Rev. Code
Ann. §5301.56 (2014)
Indiana Mineral Lapse Act, Ind. Code Ann.
§32-23-10-2 (2002)
Texaco v. Short, 454 U.S. 516 (1982)
Authors:
Peggy Kirk Hall, Asst. Professor, Agricultural &
Resource Law
Catharine Daniels and Matt Muzic, OSU Extension
Agricultural & Resource Law Program
The Ohio Dormant Minerals Act Page 4