1
Internet Payday Lending:
How High-priced Lenders Use the Internet to
Mire Borrowers in Debt and Evade State
Consumer Protections
A CFA Survey of Internet Payday Loan Sites
Jean Ann Fox
Anna Petrini
Consumer Federation of America
November 30, 2004
Consumer Federation of America 1424 16
th
Street NW Suite 604 Washington, DC 20036
www.consumerfed.org
2
Table of Contents
Executive Summary 4
Introduction 5
Payday Loans Migrate from Store Fronts to Cyberspace 5
Banks Play a Key Role in Internet Payday Lending 7
Internet Payday Lending Latest Tactic to Evade Consumer Protections 7
State Small Loan and Payday Loan Limits 7
Jurisdiction and Enforcement 8
Kansas Cases 10
New York Order 11
Colorado Advisories 12
Internet Payday Lenders Difficult to Identify 12
Making Payday Loans via the Internet: How It Works 13
Qualifications 13
Applications 14
Consent at the Click of A Mouse 15
Contracts and Authorization Forms 15
Documentation 16
Loan Approvals 16
Electronic Delivery and Payment 17
Repayment Options 17
Collections 17
Marketing Internet Payday Loans 17
Search Results 18
Print Advertising 18
Yellow Pages Ads 19
E-Mail 19
Referral Fees/Affiliate Marketing 19
“Advice” Sites 20
CFA Survey of 100 Internet Payday Loan Sites 20
Who and Where Are Lenders 20
Who Regulates Lenders 21
Where Loans Are Available 21
Whose Law Lenders Claim 22
Loan Size Offered 22
Cost of Internet Payday Loans 22
Disclosure of Finance Charges 23
Disclosure of Annual Percentage Rates 23
Loan Terms Offered on Websites 23
Repayment Options/Collection Terms 24
3
Table of Contents, contd.
Signing Away Rights 24
Privacy and Security Features 25
Customer Service and Contact Information 26
Serious Risks to Consumers of Internet Payday Lending 26
Factors that Create a Debt Trap 26
Extreme High Cost of Loans 27
Overextended with Multiple Loans 27
Automatic Renewals 27
Collection Problems Exacerbated by Electronic Lending 28
Security and Privacy Risks of Internet Payday Lending 30
Electronic Fund Transfers Rules and Debit-Based Payday Lending 31
Electronic Fund Transfers Act and Reg E 32
NACHA Rules 32
WEB Rule Requirements 33
PPD Rule Requirements 34
Prohibition on Required Electronic Payment as a Condition of a Loan 34
Liability Limits and Unauthorized Use of Debits 34
Stopping Payment on Debits 34
Withdrawing Authorization for Electronic Transactions 35
Multiple Presentments to Collect Checks Electronically 36
Collecting NSF Fees Through the ACH System 36
Enforcing NACHA Rules 36
Complaints about EFTA/Reg E 37
Recommendations 37
Advice to Consumers 37
Appendix A: CFA Internet Payday Loan Survey Methodology and Sampling Protocol 39
Appendix B: CFA Surveyed Lender Key and Summary Chart 41
Appendix C: CFA Survey Key and Summary Chart on Loan Terms and Limits 46
Appendix D: CFA Terms of State Payday and Small Loan Laws for Check-Based Loans 51
4
Internet Payday Lending:
How High-Priced Lenders Use the Internet to Mire Borrowers in Debt and Evade State
Consumer Protections
November 30, 2004
Executive Summary
• Payday lending has expanded from check cashing outlets, pawn shops and payday loan outlets to
the Internet. Loans are marketed, delivered and collected online at rates and terms that mire cash-
strapped consumers in repeat borrowing at extremely high costs. Finance charges are in the $25
(650% APR) to $30 (780% APR) per $100 borrowed range, with built in loan flipping in many
contracts.
• Web sites marketing and/or delivering small loans are growing rapidly, with numerous referral
sites feeding applications to actual lenders. Lenders are hard to locate, identify or contact. Some
are licensed in their home states, while others hide behind anonymous domain registrations or are
located outside the United States.
• Banks are involved in Internet payday loans through the Automated Clearing House System
(ACH) used to electronically deliver loans to consumers’ bank accounts and to withdraw
payments. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, DE, participates directly in Internet payday lending.
• Internet payday lenders bypass state usury laws and consumer protections by locating in lax
regulatory states and making loans without complying with licensing requirements or state
protections in the borrower’s home state. State regulators, notably in Kansas, New York and
Colorado, are beginning to enforce state usury and small loan laws against lenders making loans
online to state consumers.
• Payday loan applications made online expose consumers to privacy and security risks as bank
account numbers, Social Security numbers, and other personal financial information are
transmitted to lenders, often over unsecure web links. Privacy policies do not protect privacy.
• Federal electronic banking laws and industry self regulatory rules for use of the Automated
Clearing House (ACH) system do not adequately protect consumers who use electronic fund
transfers to borrow and repay loans from bank accounts.
5
Introduction
The new frontier in the fringe small loan market in cyberspace is payday loans marketed online,
delivered directly to borrowers’ bank accounts and collected electronically with no personal contact
between lender and borrower. Reports published by Consumer Federation of America over the last seven
years have documented the growth of check-based lending, the ruses and scams used by some to evade
state usury and small loan laws, and rent-a-bank partnerships employed by leading payday lenders to
avoid state efforts to regulate the small loan industry. Reports from CFA and other organizations and
state officials demonstrate the debt trap set for cash-strapped consumers by check-based lenders and the
collection tactics used to ensure repeat borrowing by consumers at storefront operations.
1
This report summarizes a survey of a sample of one hundred Internet sites offering payday loans
and explores the additional risks to consumers who borrow from distant lenders by providing access to
personal bank accounts to receive loan proceeds and make payments via electronic funds transfer.
Internet payday lending is the latest ploy used by small loan companies to evade consumer protections
and usury laws in the state where borrowers apply for and receive loans and few state regulators have
attempted to enforce state credit laws against online lenders.
Payday lending on the Internet involves a confusing mix of referral sites, loan sites, websites that
appear to offer financial education or counseling, or sites that hold themselves out as payday lender rating
services. Consumers are urged to get up to $2,500 deposited overnight in their bank accounts by filling
out online applications and/or faxing applications and support documents without knowing to whom or
where that personal financial information goes. Online payday loans are delivered and collected through
electronic fund transfers.
Payday loans made online combine the negative aspects of store-front payday loans (extreme high
cost, loan flipping and coercive collection tactics) with the additional problems of jurisdiction and
applicable law, security and privacy risks of entering personal financial information online, and gaps in
the federal laws and industry rules for electronic fund transfers and the Automated Clearing House system
industry self-regulation rules. Consumers who borrow online have additional difficulties with locating
and communicating with web lenders who are hard to find or identify to resolve disputes.
1
See, “Unsafe and Unsound: Payday Lenders Hide Behind FDIC Bank Charters to Peddle Usury,” report by Consumer
Federation of America, March 2004, www.consumerfed.org/pdlrentabankreport.pdf
“Rent-A-Bank Payday Lending: How Banks Help Payday Lenders Evade State Consumer Protections,” report by Consumer
Federation of America and the U. S. Public Interest Research Group, November 2001, www.consumerfed.org/paydayreport.pdf
“Show Me The Money,” report by Consumer Federation of America and the U. S. Public Interest Research Group, February
2000, http://uspirg.org/uspirg.asp?id2=5043&id3=USPIRG&
“Safe Harbor for Usury: Recent Developments in Payday Lending,” Consumer Federation of America, September 1999,
www.consumerfed.org/safeharbor.pdf
“The Growth of Legal Loan Sharking: A Report on the Payday Loan Industry,” Consumer Federation of America, November
1998.
6
Payday Loans Migrate from Store Front to Cyberspace
Payday loans are small cash loans based on borrowers’ personal checks held for future deposit or
on electronic access to borrowers’ bank accounts. Check-based loans of $100 to $500 or more cost triple-
digit interest rates, typically 390% to 780% annual interest rates for two-week loans with $15 to $30
finance charges per $100 loaned. These single-payment loans are due in full on the borrower’s next
payday, typically in two weeks. Borrowers must have a bank account in relatively good standing and a
source of income or benefits to qualify for loans. Lenders do not determine the borrower’s ability to
repay through conventional credit checks or application information. Payday lenders entice cash-strapped
consumers to write checks without funds on deposit and then use those checks to coerce repeat
transactions or collections. The combination of relatively large loan size, expensive finance charges,
short repayment terms, and check holding results in loan flipping that traps many vulnerable consumers in
debt.
According to industry sources, there are about 22,000 storefront payday loan outlets, making $40
billion a year in loans and collecting $6 billion in finance charges from borrowers.
2
We know of no
industry-wide or government studies that measure the size of the Internet payday loan market, or the
number of actual lenders (versus the proliferation of referral sites). The Yahoo Shopping directory listed
almost 140 payday lenders in late August. One marketer claims that over seventy million Americans
relied on the Internet for online payday loan sites last year.
3
PDL Marketing LLC claims that its affiliate
web sites generate over 10,000 fresh, exclusive payday loan applications every single week.
4
A Google
search for “payday loan” and “application” resulted in 252,000 hits on October 27, 2004. While some
Internet lenders are licensed in their home states, none of those states publish annual report data on the
number, dollar value, or price of licensee lending, either online or at storefront locations.
One of the few sources of payday loan industry data, Stephens Inc., a Little Rock investment bank,
reported in late 2003 that over 50 separate websites offered payday loans, not counting sites for store-
based lenders. Stephens found that fees range from 15% to 35% with a median rate of 25% of the loan,
that most sites offered loans of up to $500 while a few sites loaned up to $1,000, and that many online
payday lenders were based in California, Delaware or offshore locations such as Costa Rica.
5
An early survey of Internet payday lending by the Massachusetts Division of Banks on Internet
payday lending in 2000, noted how little information was provided by some companies about themselves
and how much information was required from their customers.
6
Of the sixteen web sites surveyed,
Massachusetts regulators found that only seven disclosed any information about fees or interest rates. The
New York Banking Department also surveyed Internet payday lenders in 2000 and found thirty-two
listings, some with multiple outlet locations. CFA resurveyed the New York list of sites in mid-2004 and
found that about a dozen were still actively making loans four years later and that some domain names
were now owned by others or were up for sale.
2
Dennis Telzrow, “The 3U Consumer Finance Monthly,” Stephens, Inc., March 29, 2004, p. 2.
3
MaxOutLoan.com, www.maxoutloan.com/affiliates.html, visited August 16, 2004.
4
Email from [email protected] to Alaska Public Interest Research Group, August 16, 2004.
5
Jerry L. Robinson, “Update on the Payday Loan Industry: Observations on Recent Industry Developments,” Stephens Inc.,
Sept. 26, 2003, p. 18.
6
Massachusetts Division of Banking, “Internet Payday Loans – Risky Business,” May 30, 2000,
www.state.ma.us/dob/payday.htm, viewed August 27, 2002.
7
Banks Play a Key Role in Internet Payday Lending
Banks are involved on both ends of every Internet payday loan delivered by the ACH system. A
consumer’s bank receives the loan proceeds direct deposited into the consumer’s account and
electronically withdraws payment on the due date. If funds are not sufficient to cover the withdrawal, an
insufficient funds fee is levied. The payday lender’s bank initiates the loan electronically and receives the
payment on the due date. The National Automated Clearing House Association (NACHA), the industry
self-regulatory group, writes and enforces the voluntary rules that govern bank use of the ACH system.
County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, DE was the only bank found by the survey as the purported
lender for online non-bank payday lenders. A Google search in March 2004 for County Bank turned up
over twenty-nine URLs for sites where loans were made online.
7
Many of the URLs led back to the same
web site. The County Bank-affiliated web sites stated that loans are not made to consumers in one or
more states, including Colorado, Delaware, Florida, New York, California, Idaho, and West Virginia.
The cost of payday loans marketed on these sites ranged from 573% APR to 782% APR in the instances
where cost information could be found.
8
A complaint filed in New Jersey alleged that County Bank made
loans through servicing agents costing 780% for a two-week term despite New Jersey’s 30% usury cap.
9
Internet Payday Lending Latest Tactic to Evade Consumer Protections
State Small Loan and Payday Loan Limits
Payday loans are small loans subject to state small loan, usury or payday loan laws. Fifteen states
prohibit payday lending under state usury and small loan laws. Thirty-three states and the District of
Columbia have enacted laws or regulations to authorize check-based payday lending. Alaska enacted a
payday loan-authorization law that will take effect in 2005. Two additional states, New Mexico and
Wisconsin, permit licensed lenders to make payday loans without substantive restrictions on loan terms.
States that legalize payday loans typically require lenders to be licensed or registered and to comply with
a range of provisions, including maximum loan size, duration, and terms.
10
(See Appendix D.)
Internet payday lenders evade state usury and payday loan laws that protect consumers by getting
licenses in states without meaningful restrictions, by operating without state licensing at all, or by locating
out of the country and claiming that loans are made subject to the laws of the lender’s purported home
7
www.moneybyfax.com, www.cashnet500.com/index.asp, www.cashreserve.net/, www.loansbyfax.com/index.htm,
www.fastcashovernight.com, www.emerbencyloansnow.com, http://cashxpress.com, www.needaloannow.com,
www.cashdoctors.com/index.htm, www.webfastcash.com/?page=infor&type=appinfo, www.500cashhotline.com,
www.myautocash.com, www.fastcashhasslefree.com, www.mrspeedycash.com, www.speedwaycash.com,
www.fastcashnoquestions.com, www.500emergencycash.com, www.911emergencycash.com, www.911cashmoney.com,
www.shortermloan.net, www.choicecash.com/TermsConditions.aspx, www.firstchoicecash.com,
www.ezmoneypaydayloan.com/mainpage.html, www.500radiocash.com, www.684cash.com, www.212cash.com,
www.cashauto.net, www.advantage-insuranceinc.com/ezcash/, www.paydayexpressloan.com/mainpage.html,
www.222cash.com
8
Survey of Google search for “County Bank” conducted by CFA, March , 2004. On file with author.
9
Jaliyah Muhammad v. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, Easycash, Telecash and Main Street Service Corporation,
filed in Superior Court of New Jersey Union County.
8
country. In addition Internet payday lenders often claim a choice of law in states with few restrictions and
no usury caps.
At its web site, USAdvance.com says “You have entered the legal domain of the Federation of
Saint Christopher and Nevis.” Transactions will be “deemed to have taken place in the Federation,”
despite the fact that arbitration hearings for disputes with this website will be conducted in Wilmington,
DE.
11
A major online lender, United Cash Loans, provides a Carson City, Nevada address although the
domain is registered to a Vancouver, Canada marketing firm, but is not licensed by Nevada payday loan
regulators.
PaydayConnection.com states that “we are currently providing our services for residents of the
states listed below,” then provides links to sites in cities, such as Philadelphia, New York, Baltimore, and
Boston, all in states with usury or small loan rate caps that do not permit payday lending.
12
The
disclaimer at FastCashAdvancePaydayLoan.com states that its service “does not constitute any offer or
solicitation for a short term or payday loans cash advance loans in any state…may or may not be available
in your particular state…” Then the site provides links to all fifty states and cities in states where payday
lending is not legal.
13
Paydayconnection posts a notice that “by applying for a loan with us, you are
agreeing that your loan transactions will be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware. Delaware
laws and regulations may be different from your state of residence.”
14
Another site provides an
application for Georgia payday loans, a state where small lenders are required to be licensed by the state
and charge no more than 60% annual interest. Paydayconnection.com will lend $1,000 to California
residents, despite that state’s cap of $300 for the loan plus finance charge.
15
Some sites try to have it both ways, by providing links for payday loans in all fifty states while
including a disclaimer that “This ad does not constitute an offer or solicitation for short term payday
loans, payday advance, payroll loans, or personal loans in all states. The source lenders we use may or
may not be available in your particular state.”
16
Only a few sites in the CFA survey actually refused to
accept loan applications coming from specific states.
Jurisdiction and Enforcement
Questions of jurisdiction and applicable law are not unique to payday loan web sites. Justice
Lebedeff ruled in a New York Internet commerce case that “invocation of ‘the Internet’ is not the
equivalent to a cry of ‘sanctuary’ upon a criminal’s entry into a medieval church,” in finding that a
magazine seller was subject to and had violated New York’s consumer protection laws. The judge also
found that Commerce Clause concerns did not apply because the consumer protections being enforced
were media neutral.
17
11
www.usadvance.com/ visited 8/24/04.
12
www.paydayconnection.com/payday_advance/ visited 8/14/04.
13
www.fast-cash-advance-payday-loan.com, visited 8/28/04.
14
www.paydayconnection.com/payday_loan_states/, visited 8/14/04.
15
www.paydayconnection.com, visited 8/13/04.
16
www.instant-payday-loans.us/payday-loans-map.shtml, visited 8/28/04.
17
People v. Lipsitz, NYLJ, June 25, 1997, at 1A, (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1997). Reported in NAAG Consumer Protection Report,
“Internet Jurisdiction Issues,” Eric A. Wenger and Jane Azia, August-September 1997.
9
State “long-arm statutes” have long held that states have jurisdiction over businesses that enter
their states to conduct business, regardless of where the business is actually located. In Zippo
Manufacturing v. ZippoDot Com, Federal court set a sliding scale to determine whether a business located
in a state outside of the consumer’s state can be held to the laws of the consumer’s state. If a business
merely advertises or provides information, or the information provided is clearly intended for a specific
audience in a particular state, the business does not come under the jurisdiction of a consumer who solely
views the advertisement or information in another state. At the other end of the scale, if a business
solicits business, accepts business, and continues to transact business with a consumer in another state, the
court held that, in fact, the “electronic” business is conducting business in the consumer’s state, and
therefore, is subject to the laws and courts of that state.
18
In an Internet gambling case, an injured Texas consumer sued a California-based gaming website
under Texas law. The website argued that it was not based in Texas, its servers were in California, and its
customers signed a choice of law agreement stating that they would abide by California law. The US
District court held that the gaming site was indeed doing business in Texas and was, regardless of the
contract choice of law, covered by Texas law, permitting Texas consumers to sue the California gaming
site under Texas law in Texas state court.
19
States have broad power to protect citizens where federal law does not directly conflict.
20
The National Consumer Law Center Cost of Credit manual notes that courts generally find that web sites
by which a lender conducts business with residents of the state in question, such as entering into contracts
and exchanging files, meets the minimum contacts test to give the consumer’s state jurisdiction in e-
commerce cases.
21
States are just beginning to come to grips with regulatory issues resulting from loans
made to state residents by out-of-state lenders via the Internet. Iowa’s Uniform Consumer Credit Code
prohibits waiver of rights, such as choice of law provisions in contracts. Regulators hold that interactive
Internet loans made with an Iowa consumer by an out-of-state lender are subject to Iowa credit laws.
22
Other states are adapting credit laws to cover loans made via the Internet. The Colorado Uniform
Consumer Credit Code was amended in 2000 to specifically cover consumer loans made over the Internet,
if the consumer is physically in the state with the transaction is made.
23
Maine’s lending jurisdiction law
was amended to deal with Internet communications and now reads, “This Act…applies to…transactions
… if … (t)he creditor, wherever located, induces the consumer … to enter into the transaction … by …
mail, telephone or electronic mail solicitation…”
24
The Virginia Bureau of Financial Institutions
18
952 F. Supp. 1119, 1124-15 (W.D.Pa. 1997)
19
998 F.Supp. 738, 744 (W.D. Tex. 1998).
20
City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey, 437 U.S. 617, 624-625 (1978).
21
National Consumer Law Center, The Cost of Credit: Regulation and Legal Challenges, p. 392.
22
Electronic communication, Kathleen Keest, Assistant Attorney General, Iowa, received Nov. 15, 2002, on file with author.
23
CO 5-1-201. Territorial application – definitions. (1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, this code applies to
consumer credit transactions made in this state and to modifications, including refinancing, consolidations, and deferrals, made
in this state, of consumer credit transactions, wherever made. For purposes of this code, a consumer credit transaction is made
in this state if: (a) A written agreement evidencing the obligation or offer of the consumer is received by the creditor in this
state; or (b) A consumer who is a resident of this state enters into the transaction with a creditor who has solicited or advertised
in this state by any means, including but not limited to mail, brochure, telephone, print, radio, television, internet, or any other
electronic means. (2) Notwithstanding paragraph (b) of subsection (1) of this section, unless made subject to this code by
agreement of the parties, a consumer credit transaction is not made in this state if a resident of this state enters into the
transaction while physically present in another state.
24
Title 9-A Maine Revised Statutes Annotated, section 1-201(1), “Territorial application”
10
regulation implementing the payday loan law prohibits loans secured by electronic access to the
borrower’s bank account. The only security for the loan in Virginia is the paper check. Since all Internet
payday loans employ ACH or electronic fund transfer to deliver loans, Virginia regulators view internet
lending as prohibited although no enforcement has been attempted.
25
Utah requires Internet payday
lenders to comply with state requirements to disclose a complete schedule of interest and fees charged for
a loan, a phone number the consumer can call to file a complaint with Utah regulators, and a list of states
where the check casher is registered or authorized to offer deferred deposit loans through the Internet or
other electronic means.
26
Some states require out-of-state lenders to get a state license. New Mexico requires non-resident
lenders to be licensed to make loans to consumers.
27
Oklahoma’s payday loan law was amended in 2004
to expressly apply to loans made via the Internet, although state regulators already thought they had that
authority.
28
The North Carolina usury law applies to out-of-state lenders if the borrower accepts the loan
offer in North Carolina even if the solicitation comes from outside the state. The NC Consumer Finance
Act provides that loans made from outside the state to a North Carolina borrower are not enforceable in
North Carolina if the rates exceed the rates permitted under the Consumer Finance Act. Non-bank
internet lenders would be subject to state law in North Carolina.
29
Also, Washington law requires that
state usury limits apply to loans made to Washington residents from outside the state. “Whenever a loan
or forbearance is made outside Washington state to a person then residing in this state the usury laws
found in chapter 19.52 RCW, as now or hereafter amended, shall be applicable in all courts of this state to
the same extent such usury laws would be applicable if the loan or forbearance was made in this state.”
30
A site with links to all fifty states says that “When applying for a loan on the internet, the
company you are dealing with is bound by the rules of the state where they are operating in.”
31
State
credit regulators are challenging out-of-state Internet payday lenders who make loans to consumers
without complying with state licensing requirements or state payday loan limits. Loans may be
unenforceable if made without complying with credit laws where the consumer resides.
Kansas Cases
The Kansas Office of State Bank Commissioner has been the leader in enforcing the state’s
payday loan law and licensing requirement with out-of-state Internet lenders. A loan is considered made
in Kansas and subject to state regulation where a creditor induces a Kansas resident to enter into the
transaction by solicitation in the state by any means including mail, telephone, television, or any other
electronic means including the Internet.
32
Kansas regulators have argued that state regulators have
jurisdiction over out-of-state Internet lenders, describing the loan process as deliberately targeting local
consumers.
25
See: Case No. BFI-2002-00012 at www.state.va.us/scc/caseinfo/orders.htm
26
Utah Code Ann. 7-23-105.
27
New Mexico Statutes 58-15-3, Code of New Mexico Rules, Title 12, Chapter 18, Part 8. Licensing of Nonresident Lenders.
28
“The provisions of this act shall apply to transactions if the lender, wherever located, enters into the transaction with the
debtor by mail, brochure, telephone, print, radio, television, Internet, or any other means.” Okla. Stat. Tit. 59 Sec. 3103.C.
29
G.S. 24-2.1, G.S. 53-190, North Carolina.
30
Wash. Rev. Code § 19.52.034. Washington courts are not free to engage in conflict of law analysis to determine whether the
parties’ own choice of law provision should apply, NCLC Cost of Credit, p. 391.
31
www.instant-payday-loans.us/payday_loan_staterules.shtm, visited 8/28/04.
32
K.S.A. 16a-1-201
11
When construction of the website and viewing of that website by a Kansas consumer
results in the Kansas consumer obtaining a payday loan from the company operating the website,
it is logical to assume that the website constituted a ‘solicitation,” in the plain and ordinary sense
of the word, of that consumer. Respondent’s website contains information regarding the
availability of loans, and allows a Kansas consumer to ‘Apply in Under 2 Minutes’ by answering
five questions. Once the consumer answers the five questions and clicks on ‘apply now,’ the next
screen viewed by the consumer says, ‘Congratulations! You have been pre qualified for UP TO a
$500.00 loan.’ This statement constitutes a solicitation, and is certainly an inducement to the
individual consumer, who has just provided their personal e-mail address and the answers to the
five questions, to continue filling out the loan application. Once the consumer finishes filling out
the remainder of the loan application, and submits it to Respondent electronically, the consumer
receives an e-mail from Respondent with an electronic version of the loan form that has been
completed with all of the consumer’s personal information and loan terms. That form is then
printed and signed by the consumer, and faxed back to Respondent for final processing. That
fully-individualized loan form, sent to the consumer electronically by Respondent, also constitutes
a solicitation of the consumer.
33
Kansas regulators settled cases for unlicensed payday lending by Mycashnow.com of
Chattanooga, TN,
34
and National Opportunities of New Castle, DE (operating a web site
www.itsyourpayday.com).
35
These unlicensed lenders agreed to refund finance charges collected from
Kansas consumers. Kansas regulators also have a pending case against Cash Advance and United Cash
Loans of Nevada. When that case was filed in 2003, regulators sought $4.5 million in fines. The
companies which share the same owner appealed a preliminary order and a hearing was scheduled.
Regulators reported that the two companies made loans to at least nine hundred Kansas consumers. Cash
Advance charged $90 for a two-week $300 loan that would cost $23 if made according to the Kansas
payday loan law. The $75 finance charge for a $250 loan by United Cash Loans also exceeded Kansas
rate limits.
36
New York Order
A Nevada-licensed Internet payday lender agreed to stop making loans in New York according to
a November 2004 agreement with Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. Cashback Payday Loans, Inc., based in
Las Vegas, charged 650% APR for two week loans in a state with a 25% criminal usury law and a 16%
civil usury cap. The consumer who complained to New York regulators paid $825 in interest on a $470
loan and was told she owed another $925.
37
The Assurance of Discontinuance states “The Attorney
General believes, by offering and making the above described ‘payday loans’ without a license to do so in
New York State and by repeatedly and persistently making loans to New York consumers at interest rates
that exceed twenty-five percent (25%) per year, Cashback has violated of GOL 5-501, Penal Law 190.40
and Executive Law 63(12).” Cashback did not admit violation of law in signing the agreement to stop
33
Kansas, Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Opposition to Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss, In the Matter of: United Cash Loans,
2533 N. Carson Street #5020, Carson City, Nevada 89706 and All Owners, Officers and Members, Respondent. Served July
28, 2003.
34
Summary Order to Cease and Desist and Pay Fine, Office of State Bank Commissioner v. Mycashnow.com Inc.
35
Amended Summary Order to Cease and Desist and Pay Fine, Office of State Bank Commissioner v. National Opportunities
Unlimited Inc., Feb. 21, 2003.
36
Deb Gruver, “State orders two online lenders to stop doing business,” The Witchita Eagle, Nov. 13, 2003
37
Michael Gormley, “Payday Company Forced to Forgive Loans,” Newsday, November 22, 2004.
12
making loans to New York consumers. Cashback is required to make restitution to every New York
borrower for the difference between rates charged and New York’s civil 16% interest cap. Open loans
and loans in collection will be null and void.
38
Colorado Advisories
In late November, Colorado’s consumer credit regulator issued cease and desist advisories to three
Internet payday lenders believed to be offering deferred deposit loans in Colorado without complying
with state law. The advisories warn lenders that failure to obtain a supervised lender’s license when
required can trigger injunctions, refunds of all finance charges, and potential criminal liability.
Companies warned by Colorado regulators include Preferred Cash Loans and Cash Advance, both of
Carson City, Nevada; and Quik Payday Inc., located in Logan, Utah.
39
Quik Payday charges $20 per
$100 for loans up to $500, while Colorado’s deferred presentment law caps rates at 20% of the first $300
and 7.5% for loan amounts over $300 to $500.
Internet Payday Lenders Difficult to Identify
The online payday loan industry is a confusing mix of lender sites, referral sites, and layers of
click-through entities. Consumers who click through links on referral sites may have no idea who is
making the actual loan or collecting their personal information. A consumer clicking on moneybyfax.com
ends up at the application page on instantcashusa.com. A visitor to internetfastcash.com clicks through to
paydayconnection.com. A borrower who starts at paydayadvanceonline.com encounters paperwork
giving AccessEZ Cash, Inc. authorization to withdraw payment of the loan and EasyCashNow.com the
right to “initiate either the whole amount or portions of the amount until fully paid.”
40
Consumers could
easily lose track of which web site they used to get a loan.
Some sites are payday lenders with a physical location in addition to making loans online, while
others only lend via the Internet. Some are licensed in a state with lax regulatory requirements but located
elsewhere.
41
Many are referral sites that collect applications from potential borrowers and then hand them
off to actual lenders for a fee (see Marketing Internet Payday Loans.) These referral sites carry
disclaimers, such as “Advance Cash Loans is not an online provider of online payday cash advances. We
simply connect people seeking fast cashadvances with online providers of instant cashadvances so they
can get the advancecash that they need as soon as possible. Thank you for visiting Advance Cash Loans.
We wish you luck on your search for online payday cashadvances.”
42
Looking up web site addresses, or URLs, on domain registries often does not provide information
on the actual owners of web sites. Several sites in the survey sample are registered through Domains by
Proxy in Arizona, an anonymous service that hides the ownership and location of web site owners. In
some cases marketing firms are registered as the domain owner, with a Vancouver company listed as
38
Attorney General New York, Assurance of Discontinuance In the Matter of Cashback Payday Loans, Inc., November 3,
2004.
39
Cease and Desist Advisories, State of Colorado Office of the Attorney General, issued November 23, 2004, on file with
author.
40
www.paydayadvanceonline.com, visited 8/30/04.
41
MyCashTime.com has a NM license
42
www.advancecashloans.com/info.html, visited August 26, 2004.
13
owning several sites in the survey. FastBucks.com has a Virginia registry listing, despite the fact that the
company is located in New Mexico.
Some consultants offer turnkey payday web sites that include the domain name registry, hosting,
monitoring, a secure site seal, help with search engines and access to the Automated Clearinghouse
Network.
43
PDLMarketing LLC claims to have developed over three hundred “live” domains and
expects to be the top payday loan lead generation source by the third quarter of 2005.
44
Cash Now, a
Canadian payday lender with offices in Pennsylvania, markets franchises to people who want to become
storefront or Internet lenders. Washington, California, and Illinois securities regulators have halted Cash
Now’s sale of franchises in their states.
45
Internet payday lenders may involve a complex set of interlocking company names for marketing
purposes, loan servicing, and collections. A lawsuit filed in Texas against a Canadian consortium of
lenders named multiple company names involved in one loan transaction.
46
A pro-bono attorney assisting
consumers filed a complaint with Kansas regulators about a lender apparently located in Kansas with a
domain name registered in Nevada by a registered agent for foreign corporations.
47
Tracking down the real lender at a physical location is a difficult process for lawyers and
regulators, much less for borrowers trying to contact the lender or resolve complaints. As noted in the
website survey, companies making payday loans via the Internet are located outside the United States,
making it even more difficult to exercise consumer rights, bring enforcement cases, or resolve disputes.
Making Payday Loans via the Internet: How it works
Although offers and arrangements vary from site to site, the typical Internet payday loan involves
an online or faxed application in which the borrower provides extensive personal and financial
information, direct deposit of the loan proceeds into the borrower’s bank account through the Automated
Clearing House system on the same or next day, and an agreement to permit the payday lender to
withdraw the loan and finance charge electronically from the consumer’s bank account on his/her next
payday.
Qualifications
Qualification requirements on the purported County Bank application are typical. To be eligible for a
$500 loan, a consumer must have a steady income, be able to show a verifiable source of recurring
income payments, have a checking account with the consumer’s name printed on the checks, be able to be
contacted after work, be at least 18 years old, have a gross income of at least $1000 per month or a
minimum of $800 per month in Social Security or other benefits income. Applicants must not be
delinquent on a prior loan from County Bank or other short term loan lenders, and must have access to a
43
“Turnkey Payday Loan Web Sites,” www.fastcashconsulting.com/payday-loan-turnkey-web-sites.htm, visited April 19,
2004.
44
www.pdlmarketing.com/, visited September 24, 2004.
45
CALIFORNIA decision, press release from Cash Now.
46
Rhonda Green v. Payroll Loans Direct, Limited Partnership d/b/a PRL Direct.com, et al. District Court Dallas, TX.
47
Consumer complaint to Kansas regulators, on file with author.
14
fax machine.
48
Required borrower income levels generally range from $800 to $1200 per month. One
lender claims they will never allow applicants to bite off more than they can chew by not approving loan
amounts for more than your biweekly net pay.
49
Lenders advertise no credit checks but use databases,
such as TeleTrack, to screen applicants for returned check history and payday loan use.
Applications
Sites use multi-stage applications to draw applicants into the process. The first set of questions, pre-filled
in with “yes” answers, covers the basic qualifications and asks for name and email address. When the
consumer clicks “apply,” a graphic of a check filled out for $500 payable to the borrower pops up,
followed by a much longer set of questions.
Consumers encounter a variety of methods to apply for payday loans used by Internet lenders.
Consumers fill out detailed application forms online, including bank account information and routing
numbers for their checks. A completed application form pops up which the applicant confirms and files
online. Or, more commonly, consumer information from an online application is entered into a set of
forms, which the applicant is instructed to print, sign and fax back with additional documentation.
Applicants may access this paperwork through pop-ups or icons at the end of the online application or
through links that have been sent to their email accounts. In both methods, applicants enter their bank
account numbers, Social Security numbers, birth date, and other personal financial information online to
transmit to the lender. A third method bypasses online applications altogether. Consumers are directed to
download applications, print out and complete them, and then fax the forms and documentation. Many
lenders have different procedures and requirements in place for returning customers.
The portion of the Cashnet500 application which is printed out and faxed back requests personal and
contact information, a Social Security number, whether the borrower rents or owns her home, and the
birth date. Employment information that must be supplied includes the supervisor’s name, shift hours,
and phone number, net take home pay and schedule of pay periods, whether the pay is made through
direct deposit, the next pay day and the second pay date. Applicants must give the names and phone
number for two contact persons. No questions are asked about other debts or obligations that would
enable a lender to determine ability to repay the loan.
Some applications ask very intrusive questions. Onlinepaydayadvance.com asks if a consumer has ever
filed for bankruptcy, had property foreclosed or made a settlement for a creditor’s benefit. It asks if the
consumer is party to any lawsuit or legal action or has an unsatisfied judgment against her. Is the
consumer an officer, director or shareholder of a financial institution? Have you filed all required tax
returns?
50
Applications are available in Spanish on request at some sites.
48
Htpp://216.203.40.180/lps?application_id=3235089987444963488, visited August 30, 2004. Five page application for
payday loan from County Bank via the referral web site www.payday-now.net, on file with author.
49
www.payday-now.net/payday-loans/ visited August 30, 2004.
50
www.onlinepaydayadvance.com, visited 8/16/04.
15
Consent at the Click of a Mouse
Under the federal E-Sign law, consumers can now “sign” contracts and receive required disclosures
through electronic means if federal requirements for consent and capacity are met. As electronic
signature includes any “electronic sound, symbol or process,” such as pressing a touch-tone key on the
phone, clicking “OK” on a salesperson’s computer, or through a simple email or click.
51
A contract is
“signed” by clicking “I accept.” Industry NACHA rules also require that the record creating the ACH
transaction must be signed in a way that evidences the identity of the person who signed and that person’s
assent to the terms of the contract. A payday loan borrower can electronically sign using a digital
signature, PIN, password, shared secret. A hard copy record can be authenticated via the telephone by the
consumer speaking or key-entering a code provided on the record.
52
Several sites in the survey permitted
consumers to “sign” by typing their names and clicking an “I accept” button.
Contracts and Authorization Forms
The packet of paperwork or online forms typically include a loan application, a loan note and disclosure
form, and an authorization to access the bank account. Application forms include an agreement to
arbitrate all disputes, and agreement not to bring or participate in class action lawsuits. The applicant
signs and dates the form.
The contract is often called a “Loan Note & Disclosure” and spells out the Truth in Lending cost
disclosures, the payment schedule, prepayment policy, and itemization of the loan and the finance charge.
Contracts repeat the agreement to arbitrate all disputes, not to join a class action lawsuit, a promise not to
file for bankruptcy, and agreement that the contract is bound by the law of the state where the payday
lender claims to be located.
A third form that must be signed by the borrower is the Authorization Agreement for Preauthorized
Payment. This agreement gives the lender the right to access the consumer’s bank account to deposit the
loan proceeds and to withdraw loan payment on the due date. Some agreements permit the lender to
initiate multiple withdrawals to collect a single loan. The right to withdraw access authorization no later
than three business days before payment is due is typically included. If authorization is withdrawn, the
borrower agrees that the lender will turn the electronic withdrawal into checks that will be collected from
the consumer’s account. The Cashnet500 agreement states “This authorization to prepare and submit
checks on your behalf may not be revoked by you until such time as the loan is paid in full.”
53
Contracts completed online require consumers to electronically sign contracts. Efastcash.com requires
consumers to check that they have read the terms of the application for, the privacy policy, an
authorization agreement to access the borrower’s bank account, and the loan note and disclosure. To
“sign” electronically, a consumer merely types in her full name and clicks the “I agree” button.
54
51
Brian Livingston, “Beware: E-signatures Can be Easily Forged,” News.com, July 14, 2000.
52
NACHA Operating Guidelines at 8, B.1.
53
Authorization Agreement for Preauthorized Payment, www.cashnet500.com on file with author.
54
http://efastcash.com, visited 8/27/04.
16
Documentation
At most sites, applicants are required to fax a variety of personal financial documents, typically a voided
personal check, a recent pay stub, a current bank statement, along with the signed contract and an
agreement to allow the payday lender access to the borrower’s bank account.
United Cash Loans paperwork to be faxed includes a copy of a personal check marked “void,” a copy of
the most recent bank statement, a copy of the most recent pay stub, a completed loan application with
printed and signed name, the signed Note and Disclosure form, a congratulations sheet with required
items attached, and the signed electronic payment authorization form.
55
Some sites enable consumers to access their bank statements online in order to complete applications.
Emergency Cash Loans lists over four hundred banks for applicants to click on to print off the required
bank statement in order to fax in an application with supporting documents.
56
Other sites have links to
Kinko’s to help applicants locate a commercial fax center. Others permit paperwork to be shipped by
overnight delivery.
Loan Approvals
Cashadvancefast.com claims its 30 minute approval process is “quicker than getting a pizza delivered.”
Consumers either receive an email or a phone call to let them know the loan has been approved. Lenders
use specialized credit reporting databases such as TeleTrack to screen applicants. Some verify addresses
with US Postal Service lists.
A typical claim of no credit checks: “Don’t worry about your credit rating. At Payday-loans.org, there
are absolutely no credit checks. Payday-loans.org works with providers of payday loans that will loan
you payday loans regardless of your credit history.”
57
Another site states “Don’t worry about your credit
rating. At Payday Loans Overnight, there are absolutely no credit checks.”
58
One site says: “Can I still get an unsecured loan if I have bad credit or a bankruptcy? Yes. Our list has
over 80 little-known companies willing to give ‘high risk’ loans to people with bad credit or even a
bankruptcy.”
59
“Even bankruptcy, bounced checks, charge-offs and other credit hassles don’t prevent you
from getting the cash advance you need!”
60
One lender claims to “approve 96% of payday loan
customers for up to $1,000 dollar (sic) in just 30 SECONDS!”
61
ZippyCheck will even make loans to
borrowers with current insufficient check fees, based on take home pay. If the borrower has $2,500 take
home pay, not more than $400 overdrawn is acceptable.
62
55
www.mypayday.com, linking to United Cash Loans, visited 8/27/04.
56
www.emergency-cash-loan.com/findbankfax.asp, visited September 2, 2004.
57
www.payday-loans.org/requirements.html, visited 8/28/04.
58
www.paydayloans-overnight.com, visited 8/28/04.
59
www.fast-cash-advance-payday-loan.com/guaranteed-loans.html, visited 8/28/04.
60
www.rapidcashpoviderapp.com, visited 8/30/04.
61
www.top-rated-cash-advnce-company.co/index.asp, visited 8/23/04
62
www.zippycheck.com/Zippy_approval.asp, visited 8/26/04.
17
Electronic Delivery and Payment
Payday lenders use the Automated Clearinghouse system to deliver and collect loans. This electronic
funds transfer system involves a bank on both ends of the transaction and operates under industry self-
regulatory rules administered by the National Automated Clearinghouse Association.
Internet lenders typically promise that loan proceeds will be direct deposited into the borrower’s bank
account by the next business day. On the loan due date, the loan amount and finance charge are
electronically withdrawn from the consumer’s bank account. No paper checks are involved. A few sites
will wire loan proceeds for an additional fee.
Sites make claims of reliability as a result of ACH capacity. One site disclosed: “We are authorized to
use the Federal Reserve Wire System and we must follow all FDIC and NACHA regulations, so we are
only authorized to withdraw the amount authorized by your payday loans request.”
63
Repayment Options
Lenders typically offer three choices for repayment/loan renewal. In many cases, the default option is to
pay the finance charge only and renew the loan for another payday. If a consumer does nothing, the loan
is automatically flipped. A consumer who wants to repay the loan in full must notify the lender three
days before the loan due date or sign a separate section of the contract. After a set number of renewals,
the lender may provide the option of paying down the loan principal in $50 increments plus another
finance charge each payday. A minority of sites require payment in full on the next payday.
Collections
Payment is electronically processed without action by the consumer. If funds are not available to repay
the loan, a fee for insufficient funds is charged by the lender and another fee is imposed by the
consumer’s bank. The FastCashConsulting firm claims that ACH is an “awesome collection tool,
enabling it to collect $20,000 or more from customers that had been written off in just two months.
64
Some loan agreements permit the lender to split the payment into multiple withdrawals.
Marketing Internet Payday Loans
Payday loans are aggressively marketed via the Internet and email. A small industry of Internet
payday loan marketing companies has emerged. PDLMarketing LLC claims to have created the online
marketing programs for a majority of the top payday loan businesses, taking clients from $100,000 a
month in “new loans” to over $3 million in just six months.
65
FastCashConsulting offers turnkey payday
loan web sites that permit consumers to apply for a loan via the Internet and use the Automated
Clearinghouse Network to deposit or withdraw funds electronically. The deal includes a domain name,
web site hosting, monitoring of site traffic, a site secured by Thawte, a Verisign Company, email, auto
responders, help with search engines, Internet classified ads, links to other sites (search engines rate by
popularity), meta tags/keywords/descriptions to help search engines find a site. Fast Cash provides the
63
www.overnight-payday-loan.com/payday_loan_faq.html, visited 8/28/04.
64
www.fastcashconsulting.com/payday-loan-turnkey-web-sites.htm, visited April 19, 2004.
65
www.pdlmarketing.com/, visited September 24, 2004.
18
turn key operation for $500 plus $50 as well as all applications outside the local geographic area of the
turn key operator.
66
Search results
Search is the leading marketing tool for Internet payday lenders. Internet merchants use sophisticated
search engine optimization tools to make sure their web sites show up on the first page in search engine
results. Marketers claim that search engine optimization is replacing pay-per-click as the preferred
method of driving more consumers to web sites to produce more sales. Methods that TBBI.net offers
include keyword selection by language linguistics research, keyword saturation throughout the site, site
design elements and HTML attributes, site navigation elements and site architecture, HTML coding by
hand, link popularity integration, submission order and sequence, search engine partnering, web analytics
and consumer business profiling, among others. The company claims its search engine optimization is
100% ethical.
67
One Delaware marketer claims that the average payday loan prospect visits a minimum
of five to ten web sites before filling out an application.
68
Sites include multiple links to other payday lenders to augment search results and to earn referral fees. As
one site states, “We exchange site links for our business to be successful in being listed in Google or
Yahoo and other prominent search engines.”
69
PaydayDirect.com’s page on cash advances and payday
loans information has forty-six links to payday loan sites, including links to “military cash advance” and
“military payday loan.” Another page on that site has 185 links to payday loan related destinations.
70
Quickcashloans.com includes links to dozens of casinos.
71
Print Advertising
Internet payday lenders advertise in print media as well as online. Despite Massachusetts’ small loan law,
the Metro shopper paper in Boston ran ads this summer for www.acepays.com which offered “Fast Cash!
$100-$1000, Job & Checking account Required/NO Credit Check.” The fine print states “This is a cash
rebate for joining the www.acepays.com website. This is not a loan product. Recipient keeps the cash
rebate! Early Termination Fee applicable for cancellation or termination.”
72
Other ads in the Boston
paper include “CASH BY PHONE. Get $100 - $500! Next Day! Call Now! Why Wait! 98% approval
rate for all new applicants! Required: Checking Account, Steady Job or Recurring Income, Access to a
Fax.” www.cashnet500.com”
73
800MONEY4U.com also advertises in the Boston
74
newspaper, claiming
“No credit? No Problem!” The Washington Post’s Express paper ran an ad for “FAST CASH! $200 -
$750. No Credit? No Problem! Job and DD Req’d. www.yourcashbank.com.”
75
A visit to that web site
found loans for up to $500 from a company listed as United Capital in Salt Lake City, UT.
76
66
www.fastcashconsulting.com/Why-turnkey-web-sites.htm, visited April 19, 2004.
67
TBBI.net Search Engine Optimization, www.tbbi.net/search-engine-optimization/index.html, visited August 30, 2004.
68
www.pdlmarketing.com/, visited September 24, 2004.
69
www.top-rated-cash-advance-company.com, visited 8/23/04.
70
www.paydaydirect.com, visited 8/28/04.
71
www.quickcashloan.org/links.aspz, visited 8/29/04.
72
AcePays.com advertisement, “Metro,” Page 6, August 25, 2004.
73
CashNet500 ad, “Metro,” Page 9, August 25, 2004.
74
Payday lending is prohibited by the Massachusetts small loan law which applies to brokers and lenders.
75
Express, Washington, DC, Page 2, December 5, 2003, on file with author.
76
www.yourcashbank.com, visited December 8, 2003.
19
Yellow Pages Ads
The San Diego Yellow Pages includes dozens of listings for store front payday loan outlets. It also
advertises websites offering loans that do not comply with California payday loan limits which provide
that the check used to obtain a payday loan cannot exceed $300, including the finance charge. Typically
the maximum loan in California is $255, yet www.unitedquickcash.com advertises up to $600 Loan by
Phone to San Diego consumers. www.getcash911.com offers loans up to $500. www.cashnet500.com, a
web site affiliated with County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, DE, offers loans up to $500. Checkexpress.com
loans up to $500 and displays a Better Business Bureau seal on its Yellow Pages ad.
77
E-Mail
Consumers browsing the Internet and using email are bombarded with offers of quick cash and instant
credit from payday lenders. A typical unsolicited commercial email: “Subject Line: Cash Advance
Today – up to $1,000, no credit check. NEED CASH FAST? Borrow up to $1,000 until your next
payday!!! No Credit Check. Cash in Under 24 Hours! One Hour Approval.”
78
Missouri Attorney
General Jay Nixon snagged payday loan e-mail in one of the first cases brought to enforce Missouri’s
anti-spam law which requires that commercial email be labeled with the phrase “ADV” in the first four
characters of the subject line. A suit was filed in October 2003 against Fundetective.com of Boca Raton,
Fla. for sending several payday loan spam messages without the advertising label.
79
Applicants to online payday lenders end up on commercial email lists, under the terms of most “privacy”
policies. A North Carolina consumer got a series of payday loan mail, prefaced by “You are receiving
this email because you have completed the Pre-Qualification form or applied for a cash advance from
123onlinecash.com or one of our affiliated cash advance sites.” Payday lending at over 36 percent annual
interest is illegal under North Carolina’s small loan law.
Referral Fees/Affiliate Marketing
Affiliates are web sites that link to Internet payday lender sites by buttons or banner ads to feed payday
loan applications into the system. To make affiliate marketing work, a web site employs an affiliate
tracking system to keep count of leads and the payment due to the affiliate.
80
For example, ShareaSale
software tracks each person that visits the Rapid-Advance web site, from a referral web site.
81
TBBI.net
touts itself as “the undisputed indusry (sic) leader in payday loan web site marketing” and states that its
clients pay from $12 to $50 per application for payday loans.
82
Referral fees from the survey varied from
one site to the next for either buying or selling leads, ranging from $4 to $50. Cashadvance.com claims to
have 1,000 “satisfied affiliates” and to provide real-time tracking of referral fee income.
83
77
San Diego Yellow Pages, Loan listings, page 949-955. Collected June 2004.
78
http://www.lendergateway.com/page.php?p=500_page_payroll.htm&m=M6PD102802, Delivered Nov. 4, 2002.
79
Jefferson City News Tribune Online Edition, “Nixon Files Suits under New Anti-Spam Law,” St. Louis, MO, October 10,
2003. http://newstribune.com/stories/101003/sta_1010030065.asp, viewed October 20, 2003.
80
www.tbbi.net/affiliate-marketing/index.html, visited August 30, 2004.
81
www.rapid-advance.com/fast-cash-affiliate-information.html, visited April 14, 2004.
82
Electronic communication from [email protected] to Self-Help Credit Union, March 18, 2004, on file with author.
83
www.cashadvance.com/affiliates/index.html, visited 8/27/04.
20
Some lenders also pay their customers a bounty to refer their friends. Loan Me Cash pays $15 for every
referral who qualifies for a loan.
84
PaydayOK pays a $10 fee to customers who forward email to a friend
who then gets a loan.
85
“Advice” Sites Marketing Loans
Several Internet payday loan sites market loans along with financial management advice and articles
about payday lending. MSpayday.com speaks of “empowerment lending” and provides information for
women. Other sites include news articles along with loan applications, even articles that criticize payday
lending. Advance Cash Loans gives budget and spending tips with links to applications for United Cash
Loans.
86
These sites include credit counseling contacts, and provide links to debt settlement companies.
Another site gives tips on how to save for college and how to save for retirement along with links to
payday loans.
87
AdvanceCashLoans.com offers spending and budget tips along with its payday loan offers
at 521.4% annual interest.
88
In one case the surveyor entered information into an online payday loan
application only to be sent another company’s application for credit repair services with the same
information already filled in.
89
CFA Survey of 100 Internet Payday Loan Sites
CFA surveyed a sample of 100 Internet sites that market payday loans directly to consumers. The
sample was selected, using top listings in several search engines, directories of lenders, and from e-mail
messages. Researchers collected all web pages available through each site, and clicked through links
present on web sites. We filled out online application forms with nonsense data in order to gain access to
multi-part application forms and disclosures about loan terms that in some cases were not available on the
lenders’ homepages or pages available without an application. Another purpose for “sending”
applications was to see if a secure link was provided for transmission of personal financial information.
CFA did not take out any payday loans as a part of this survey project.
In addition to observing web sites, CFA performed domain registry searches for each site and tried
to determine if lenders were licensed in their home states. For further information on the survey
methodology, please see Appendix A.
Who and Where Are Lenders
The Internet payday loan sites surveyed by CFA were categorized as lender or referral sites. Based on the
information available on the sampled web sites, we concluded that fifty-eight of the 100 sites made loans
to consumers, while forty-two were referral sites.
Some companies had multiple web sites in the sample. Internet Cash Advance Marketing, based in
Vancouver, is listed as the domain owner for six United Cash Loan primary or referral sites.
84
www.loan-me-cash.com/referral_program.html, visited August 30, 2004.
85
www.connectcommerce.com/secure/partner-app.html....
86
Also, see http://jowston.org/ visited August 26, 2004..
87
www.paydaycenter.com/financialtips.html, visited 8/28/04.
88
www.advancecashloans.com connecting to www.mypayday.com visited August 26, 2004.
89
www.paychecksinadvance.com connecting to https://lexingtonlaw.com/SignUpSecure.php visited August 17, 2004.
21
CashAdvanceNow.com, Payday One XL, Liberty Capital Investments, Benjamin Thomas LLC, Michael
Gibbons, and Network Solutions had two registrations each. Web Check Services had three registrations.
CFA conducted a domain name search for each surveyed site, noting the location of the domain name
registration. Eight sites were registered through Domains by Proxy, based in Arizona, a service that
makes web site ownership anonymous. California had the most registered sites with eighteen, followed
by ten in Canada, and nine each in Florida and Nevada. In all, twenty states were listed by domain
registry filings as well as Canada with ten, and Costa Rica and Grenada. Contact information for one site
listed a bank in the Bahamas.
90
One site claims to be a Nevada based lender with Nevada law applicable
to its loans; however, it directs consumers with questions to call the Utah State Department of Financial
Institutions.
91
Who Regulates Lenders
Of the 100 surveyed sites, fifteen sites claimed to be licensed in one of seven states (SD, DE, UT, NV,
CA, ID, NM) while two additional sites claimed to be licensed but did not say in which state. CFA
attempted to verify claims of state licensing and to check the license status of the primary lender sites. In
ten instances the web site claimed state licensing which CFA was able to confirm. Another ten Internet
lenders were listed as licensed in their home states but did not disclose their state licensing status on their
web sites. Six lenders claimed to have state licenses but CFA could not confirm that with state regulators.
In part, this uncertainty resulted from web site names having no relationship to licensed lender names, the
absence of physical addresses, and hidden domain registry information.
Where Loans Are Available
CFA also noted claims on web sites about states where loans would not be made and other limits on the
geographic availability of payday loans made via the Internet. Twelve sites listed states where loans are
not available. Two sites claimed that loans are available in all 50 states and three sites said loans are
available in the US and Canada. One site each claimed loans are made in US, Canada and the UK; only
in CA and NV; and only available in Nevada. A total of fifteen states were listed as states where loans are
not available from one or more lenders. The most frequent listings were for New York and Georgia (six
each), Kansas with five mentions, and Nebraska, Colorado, and Idaho with three sites each.
Some sites require an applicant to type in a zip code before being permitted to fill out the application.
Other sites send a message - “Error, pick a new state” - if an applicant types in a state where loans are not
made. It is not clear whether a consumer is actually denied a loan if she enters another state in response.
Other sites say they permit consumers from all fifty states to apply, such as the ad claim by FastBucks:
“Easy to apply. With Fast Bucks’ advance payday system, you get the money you need! Anywhere in
the U.S.”
92
90
www.advancepaychecknow.com/contact.htm, visited 8/30/04.
91
www.qloot.com/ga.aspx, visited 8/23/04
92
www.fastbucks.com/fast_application.asp, visited 8/13/04
22
Whose Law Lenders Claim
Twenty-eight Internet payday loan sites stated a choice of law claimed to govern loans made, with nine
states and three foreign countries mentioned. Another three sites claimed “Federal” law applied to their
loans.
93
States listed under choice of law included Delaware (6), Nevada (6), and California and New
Mexico with three listings each. Utah was listed by two sites, and Arizona, South Dakota, Pennsylvania
and Idaho were given as the choice of law on one site each. Other countries whose laws were claimed to
apply were Grenada, Costa Rica, and St. Christopher.
A review of loan terms compared to state limits for payday loans demonstrates that choice of law claims
do not always mean compliance with that choice. Delaware’s payday loan law caps loans at $500, yet
half the surveyed lenders who claim to be subject to Delaware law offer loans up to $1,000.
94
Two of the
three sites claiming California law make loans of up to $415 and $500, despite the California payday loan
law that limits the face value of the check used to get a loan at $300.
95
Loan Size Offered
The size of loans available at the surveyed sites ranged from $200 to $2,500. The most frequent loan size
was $500, at sixty-seven percent of surveyed sites. Seventeen sites will make loans of $1,000. Other loan
limits included $245, $255, $300, $415, $510, $1300, and $1500.
Cost of Internet Payday Loans
The most frequently disclosed finance charge for borrowing $100 was $25, listed on 18 sites; $30 on 12
sites, and either $17.50/$17.65 or $20 listed on five sites each. The lowest price quoted by two sites was
$10 per $100 and the highest quoted rate was the site charging $25 per $100 plus a $10 fee, for a $35 total
cost to get $100 until payday. One site claims that it is “in compliance with federal and state laws. Our
fees take all this into consideration and are available anywhere from $30 to $90, depending upon your
salary and other factors.”
96
The finance charge for loans is not the only cost to payday loan borrowers. If funds are not on deposit in
the consumer’s bank to repay loans on the due date (and borrowers have not agreed to automatic loan
renewals), lenders impose bounced check fees (NSF) which are electronically withdrawn from the
consumer’s bank account. Twenty-seven surveyed sites listed their NSF fees which ranged from $15 to
$30 per overdraft, while another two sites indicated that they charged NSF fees but did not specify an
amount. Over half the sites that listed an NSF fee charge $25 per returned withdrawal.
93
Quickest-Payday Loan.com claims that the borrower is responsible for complying with any local laws that apply to payday
lending and claim that federal law applies to its loans.
94
See Survey, www.americashadvance.com, www.paydayconnection.com, and www.internetfastcash.com.
95
See Survey, www.aeroadvance.com, www.quikmoneyonline.com.
96
www.paychecksinadvance.com/faq.html, visited 8/17/04.
23
Disclosure of Finance Charges
Only fifty-seven percent of sites posted the finance charge for loans and this information almost never
was made on the home page for the site. Finance charge disclosures were buried in FAQ pages or on a
separate disclosure page. Forty-three surveyed sites disclosed no finance charge amounts, with
consumers encouraged to apply for loans with no idea of the cost. The FAQ page at
Rapidcashprovider.com answers the “What does it cost?” question without quoting a dollar finance charge
or a typical APR. Instead the lender says “Your fees are less than the cost of not having the cash you
need.” and “Actual fees are determined based on the information you provide when you submit your loan
application.”
97
Yourcashnetwork.com answers the “what does it cost?” question with “your fees are less
than the cost of not having the cash you need when you need it.”
98
Disclosure of Annual Percentage Rates
The Federal Truth in Lending Act requires lenders to quote the annual percentage rate (APR) for loans
when advertising other trigger terms for loans, such as the finance charge. Some sites include the APR on
the same page with finance charge disclosures, while others require consumers to click onto a separate
page.
99
Although 57 sites quoted the finance charge, only 38 sites listed the APR for their loans on a page
that was accessible to consumers who had not filled out an application. Another two incorrectly quoted
the finance charge as the APR. The most frequently quoted APR for a $100 two week loan was 652% at
fifteen sites, followed by 782% at eight sites.
Some contracts generated by the lender using application information provided by the surveyor contained
inaccurate APRs. Mypayday.com stated a 26.5133% APR for a two-week loan with a finance charge of
$30 per $100 instead of 780% APR.
100
Americashadvance.com’s FAQ page lists the finance charge
without an APR disclosure.
101
Getcash911.com quotes the finance charge in a manner that could confuse
consumers about the APR. The site’s FAQ says “The APR formula is 15.0% for 1-10 day loan terms.
17.5% for 11-20 day loan terms, and 25.0% for 21-30 day loan terms.” After the application is submitted,
the consumer receives a rate disclosure page stating, “A loan of 1-10 days is only 15%; 11-20 days for
17.5%; 21-30 days for 25%.” Only the subsequent filled-in loan contract discloses the APR for a 31 day
loan at 294% APR. The more typical 14-day loan would cost 455% APR.
102
YourCashBank.com posts a
fee chart, listing the amount borrowed, the flat fee, a wiring fee, and the payback amount but does not
include an APR disclosure along with the finance charge.
103
Loan terms offered on Websites
Loan duration periods offered at online payday lenders varied. Thirty-one sites offered loans due on the
borrower’s next payday. Twelve sites make loans with a maximum duration of fifteen days while nine
97
www.rapidcashproviderapp.com, visited 8/30/04.
98
www.yourcashnetwork.com, visited 8/25/04. No cost information appears elsewhere on the site.
99
Example, www.americashadvance.com, includes a separate APR chart for combinations of loan size and term.
www.mycashnow.com posts finance charges, with a separate page for disclosures stating a 485.450% APR.
100
www.mypayday.com/process, visited 8/27/04
101
www.americashadvance.com/faq.htm, visited 8/30/04.
102
http://getcash911.com/pdl/help.asp?SID.com, visited 8/14/04.
103
www.yourcashbank.com/application.asp, visited 8/14/04.
24
sites will allow loans for as long as thirty days. Just three sites give over thirty days to repay loans, with
the longest term of 37 days.
Surveyed sites promised that loans would be delivered promptly to consumers’ bank accounts through the
ACH Network or electronic funds transfers. About three-fourths of sites promised loans delivered by the
next day. Two sites promised loans in one hour.
Repayment Options/Collection Terms
Repayment provisions for many payday lenders trap borrowers in a cycle of repeat loans. Instead of
consumers having to walk into a payday loan store to buy back their check with cash and write a new
check to renew loans, internet sites make it easy to automatically renew loans.
Options for repayment typically include permitting the lender to withdraw only the finance charge from
the borrower’s bank account on the due date, extending the loan for another pay cycle; paying the finance
charge plus a portion of the loan; or repaying the loan and finance charge in full on the next payday.
Payment options from United Cash Loans, as offered through referral site www.mypayday.com:
a. Refinance. Your loan will be refinanced on every due date unless you notify us of your desire to pay in full or to
pay down your principle amount borrowed. You will accrue a new fee every time your loan is refinanced. Any fees
accrued will not go toward the principle amount owed. On your fifth refinance and every refinance thereafter, your
loan will be paid down by $50.00. This means your account will be debited for the finance charge plus $50.00, this
will continue until your loan is paid in full.
b. Pay Down. You can pay down your principle amount by increments of $50.00. Paying down will decrease the fee
charge for refinance. To accept this option you must notify us of your request in writing via fax at 800-xxx-xxxx, at
least three full business days before your loan is due. (Phone number removed by author.)
c. Pay Out. You can payout your full balance, the principle plus the fee for that period. To accept this option you
must notify us of your request in writing via fax at 800-xxx-xxxx. The request must be received at least three full
business days before your loan is due.
104
Sixty-five of the surveyed sites permit loan renewals without repayment of principal. Forty-six sites
simply state that loans can be renewed without limits (three of these sites indicate that consumers are
entitled to unlimited renewals.) Fourteen sites quote a four renewal limit before loans must be repaid, and
three sites will permit three renewals.
Signing Away Rights
Twenty-one websites included mandatory arbitration clauses in online documents that consumers could
access without giving away personal information. Many more mandatory arbitration clauses showed up
in applications visible only after a consumer enters personal information to start the application process.
The use of mandatory arbitration clauses is almost universal in the payday loan industry, so it is likely that
all Internet lenders include mandatory arbitration clauses in final contracts.
104
http://www.mypayday.com/process/view_documents.php?unique_id.... Visited August 26, 2004
25
In addition to depriving borrowers of their right to take an Internet payday lender to court, some loan
applications also require consumers to forfeit other rights they have. The County Bank of Rehoboth
Beach, DE loan agreement is typical and includes a mandatory arbitration clause, an agreement not to
bring, join or participate in class action lawsuits against County Bank, its agents, servicers, directors,
officers and employees and agree that an injunction can be brought to remove the consumer from a class
action suit and to pay the Bank’s court costs and attorneys’ fees from taking the borrower to court. The
agreement not to bring a class action lawsuit claims to survive the closing, funding, repayment and/or
default of the loan for which the application is made. By signing the loan application a consumer agrees
to let the Bank call them at home or at work any time up to 9:00 p.m.
105
Privacy and Security Features
Although all surveyed sites ask consumers to enter personal and financial information online, eighteen
sites had no posted privacy policies. The privacy policies used by the typical web site permit the lender to
use information provided by consumers for third party marketing and other uses. In other words, when
consumers enter their personal financial information including bank account numbers on a web page to
apply for a quick loan, that information is available for unlimited uses by the web site.
The United Cash Loans privacy policy states that all information submitted to the company via the
website is the “property of United Cash Loans and United Cash Loans shall be free to use such
information for any lawful purpose…” Personal information is used for marketing other products to
consumers. “We reserve the right to share, rent, sell, or otherwise disclose data we collect to third
parties.” In order to opt out of receiving communications from United Cash Loans or its partners,
consumers must not submit their information.
106
The payday loan referral site “Cash Advance and Payday Loans Online,” operated by Jowston.org, claims
to be serious about protecting online privacy. Jowston collects or tracks web page http headers,
information entered into online application forms, surveys, or other entries, such as email addresses,
personal, financial or demographic information; information on what pages site visitors access and the
email addresses of visitors that communicate with them. The site states that personal information is used
for marketing and promotional purposes, or is added to their databases for future emails or postal
mailings. To opt out a consumer would have to not apply for a loan. The site retains the right to change
its privacy policy at any time by either sending the new policy or posting changes online to its site.
Consumers who ask to be removed are promised that their personal information will not be used in the
future.
107
Web sites indicate secure links by displaying a closed lock on the browser or adding the “s” to “https” as a
sign that information being transmitted is encrypted. These security indicators do not provide assurance
that lenders protect consumer data once it is received. The CFA survey found that security protections on
Internet payday loan sites are frequently nonexistent. Twenty-eight sites did not have secure connections
on application pages that collected personal financial information, including referral sites where the
consumer clicks through to another URL for the actual application. Another twenty-five sites, including
referral sites with different application page URLs, claimed to have secure connections but did not. A
105
Advanse Finance Loan Page, http://leadsourcing.com visited August 17, 2004.
106
www.unitedcashloans.com/?page=infor_privacy&uniquie_id..... Visited 8/24/04
107
http://jowston.org/privacyl.html visited August 26, 2004
26
total of forty-one sites had secure connections, nineteen of whom claimed some type of privacy or
security seal program.
Customer Service and Contact Information
Consumers would have a hard time locating or contacting many of the payday loan web sites surveyed.
Less than half gave a physical street address (43) or phone numbers (45). Seventy-three web sites
provided contact through email addresses or provided an online form to send email to the company.
Forty-four sites gave fax numbers for consumers to use in faxing applications and required documents,
but that could also be used to contact the lender. Almost one-fourth of the surveyed sites, twenty-three,
list no contact information of any kind.
Serious Risks to Consumers of Internet Payday Lending
Traditional payday loans are criticized as being extremely expensive, creating a debt trap and
fostering coercive collection tactics due to high finance charges, one pay-cycle repayment terms, and
check-holding by the lender. These problems, plus new ones, apply to payday loans based on debit-
holding and made via the Internet.
Factors That Create A Debt Trap
Internet payday loans become a debt trap as a result of the extremely high cost of loans, the
relatively large amount of money that must be repaid on the next payday, and the coercive use of
authorization to debit the borrower’s bank account to repay loans. It is extremely easy to get into debt to
one or more Internet payday lender, but very difficult to get out of debt. Critics of payday lending hold
that the industry business is built on loan rollovers, where borrowers pay the finance charge to extend the
loan without paying down principal. One Internet lender acknowledges that the high profits in payday
lending (claimed as a 54.65% profit margin) are due, in large part, to rollovers. FastBucks.com claims
that 80% of its customers come back before payday, pay the fee and rollover the original loan, now owing
the fee again on the same loan.
108
Lenders permit consumers to borrow a high proportion of take home pay without determining
ability to repay. For example, Paydayloans.com permits new customers to borrow up to 50% of net
income per pay period. After establishing a good repayment history, the site will permit loans up to 75%
of net income per pay period.
109
Borrowing online in the privacy of a consumer’s home may also make it
easier to become overextended. As one site puts it, “Avoid the hassle and embarrassment of having to go
to a local check cashing or cash advance center. Apply for your payroll loan in the privacy of your own
home!”
110
Another site says “If you go to a walk-in payday lender, someone you know might see
you…Imagine not having to walk into a payday loan center and stand in line, with everyone staring at
you…”
111
108
www.fastbucks.com/franchise/faq.asp, visited 8/13/04
109
www.paydayloans-paydayloans.com, visited 8/20/04.
110
www.instant-payday-loans.us/ visited 8/28/04.
111
www.zippycheck.com/payday/loans/why.html, visited 8/26/04.
27
Extreme High Cost of Loans
The finance charge per $100 for a full two-week pay cycle results in triple-digit interest rates.
Loans made for less time at the same finance charge carry astronomical APRs. From consumer’s Internet
payday loan contracts on file with the author, these examples illustrate the extreme high cost of payday
loans:
• United Consumer Financial Services, Inc., located in Utah, charged an Ohio consumer 829.54%
APR for a $200 loan which could be rolled over for 12 weeks.
• Apple Fast Cash Personal Loans, from Wilmington, DE charged $54.86 for a $400 loan for eight
days and quoted a 625.71% APR.
• Inajin Enterprises dba Axcess Cash quoted a 1,095% APR for a $300 loan and $90 finance charge
due in eleven days. The $30 NSF fee was extra.
• CashForce USA, Inc. of Keane, NH contracted to loan $400 at a cost of $75 and a 651.78% APR.
The contract stated “Your Automated Clearing House (ACH) authorization for Pre-Authorized
Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) Payments is security for this loan.”
Overextended with Multiple Concurrent Loans
Mr. X has used Internet payday loans for a year and a half. A first loan of $325 has ballooned
into six loans that would cost $4,000 to pay in full. He pays $600 -$700 a month in rollover fees,
which puts him behind on utilities, rent, and other expenses. Due to prior bankruptcy, maxed out
credit cards, and exhaustion of advances from his retirement plan, Mr. X is experiencing great
stress and few options. He fears harassment if he withdraws authorization for the lender to
withdraw finance charges or closes his account.
112
Another consumer contacted the Center for Responsible Lending in North Carolina to report a series of
Internet payday loans which he could not repay. He had borrowed $1,675 from six online payday loan
companies and owed $2,154.75. The APRs for these loans ranged from 497% to 1,564% at two web
sites. Three lenders claimed to be Delaware lenders, while another claimed to be from Idaho.
113
Automatic Renewals
A consumer reported that CashNet charged her bank account a $60 fee every week. She
eventually paid $600 to borrow $200 for what was intended to be two weeks after overlooking an asterisk
in the contract instructing her to sign a fourth page if she did not want to refinance the loan. Because she
didn’t sign, the company automatically refinanced.
114
According to the Application Supplement on page
4 of 8 from the CashNet 500 web site, a consumer has to sign and fax to the company a separate section
112
Complaint filed with Center for Responsible Lending, Sept. 28, 2004, on file with author.
113
Center for Responsible Lending 2003 complaint, on file with author.
114
“Read Everything When Getting Payday Loan,” NBC10.com, February 26, 2004,
www.nbc10.com/print/2878023/detail.html?use=print, accessed 2/27/04
28
and call the lender to decline the refinance option.
115
On the same page that CashNet500 makes perpetual
refinancing so likely, in bold print it warns “Short Term loans provide the cash needed to meet immediate
short-term cash flow problems. They are not a solution for longer term financial problems for which
other kinds of financing may be more appropriate. You may want to discuss your financial situation with
a nonprofit financial counseling service.”
Inajin Enterprises d/b/a/ Instant Cash USA also sets the default option for repayment at automatic
renewal. If consumers do not call ahead of time, the lender will deduct the finance charge only.
116
Mypaydayloan.com tells consumers it is “easier to simply make a minimum payment and extend the loan
for another two weeks” instead of repaying the loan in full and waiting four to five days after making the
payment before being allowed to apply for a renewal…”there is no waiting period for keeping your
current funds and extending the loan.”
117
Under the renewal plans of some Internet lenders, a consumer borrowing $100 at a $30 per $100
finance charge will pay $150 for one loan and four renewals (5/$30). If the principal is then repaid in $50
increments at the same rate, the consumer pays an additional $15 finance charge for the $50 principal due
at the second pay-down renewal for a total cost of borrowing $100 at $165 over a 14 week period.
Collection Problems Exacerbated by Electronic Lending
Online lenders with authorization to debit borrowers’ bank accounts can initiate payments without
any action by the borrower. United Cash Loan’s authorization agreement gives the lender permission “to
initiate one or more ACH debit entries (for example, at our option, one debit entry may be for the
principal of the loan and another for the finance charge) to your Deposit Account indicated below for the
payments that come due each pay period and/or each due date concerning every refinance, with regard to
the loan for which you are applying.”
118
Contracts include collection terms if funds are not available in the account to repay the loan. If a
borrower’s payment is dishonored at Speeddog.com for a loan applied for at Cashinaclick.com, she agrees
to pay a $20 service charge for dishonored check or ACH drafts, to pay a collection agency no less than
30% of any amount not repaid within 14 days, and to pay all costs for collections including attorneys fees,
court costs and collection costs.
119
Some lenders spell out their collection process. Quick-payday-loans.com says it will turn unpaid
accounts over to a third party collection agency which will call the borrower, her family and friends at
work and at home, and report unpaid loans to the “big 3” credit bureaus.
120
ZippyCheck says it will give
115
www.cashnet500.com/loannoteapp.asp, above the signature line, Section C – Decline Refinance Option states: “You may
decline the refinancing of this loan by signing below. To decline refinancing, you must call us at 1-800-654-7444 to alert us of
your intention to decline this option. You must also complete the information in this box, then sign and fax this document to us
at 1-800-887-9284. If you do not follow these procedures your option to decline refinancing will NOT be honored. Your loan
will be refinanced. Only the applicable finance charge then owed on any outstanding balance will be deducted from your
account. You will accrue new finance charges with every refinance of your loans.” Site visited 3/22/04.
116
www.instantcashusa.com, visited 8/14/04.
117
www.mypaydayloan.com/nat/login.asp, visited 8/16/04.
118
www.unitedcashloans.com visited 8/24/04.
119
www.sppeddog.com/application/dotnet/default.... visited 8/24/04
120
www.quick-payday-loans.com/get-a-quik-payday-loan.htm, visited 8/29/04.
29
applicant information to third parties, even if a loan is not made. If the company finds that the customer is
overdue at any service listed in the databases used by ZippyCheck, it may elect to give them information
to aid in their efforts to collect debts from the applicant.
121
ACH authorization forms give lenders permission to deduct additional fees from consumers’ bank
accounts. The CashAdvanceUSA form permits withdrawal of “any accrued late fees or applicable late
fees or applicable NSF fees.”
122
Another site claims the right to electronically withdraw payment from
consumers’ bank accounts even if the financial institution and/or account numbers are different than those
on the original application.
123
If loans are not repaid, FCash warns delinquent borrowers that their borrowing privileges will be
terminated with the FCash Service and information on the borrower will be turned over to Scan and
Telecheck services (check verification services used by retailers and banks) and “your check writing
privileges will be terminated! Your information will also be turned over to the credit bureau’s delinquent
account division.”
124
Quikmoneyonline.com tells its borrowers if collection activity begins, the borrower
will be responsible for unpaid loan extensions up to four time, plus up to four $25 NSF fees, plus
administrative fees of 50% of total balance outstanding at the time the account is processed for collection,
not counting court costs and fees and attorneys fees.
125
The Aeroadvance privacy policy states “For funds that are delinquent or in default AeroAdvance
will continue to debit the checking account that you authorized us to withdraw funds from everyday after
your due date until the funds have been collected.”
126
What goes unsaid is that each attempt to withdraw
funds from a depleted checking account will trigger bank NSF fees in addition to the payday lender’s fees
for returned debits. The 200Cash.com Inc. master agreement permits the company and/or designated
collection agency to continue initiating ACH/EFT or bank draft debit entries of the borrower’s bank
account for full or partial payments of the loan and costs until paid in full, with up to five ACH/EFT
transactions.
127
Paydayadvanceonline.com claims protection via federal bank regulatory agencies and attempts to
restrict their borrowers’ rights to file complaints under the Electronic Fund Transfers Act. The FAQ page
answers the question “How do I know you are only going to withdraw what you say?” with
“AccessEZCash, Inc. and anyone else authorized to use the Federal Reserve Wire System must follow
FDIC rules. Plus, all accounts with banks that are FDIC members are protected. You may not dispute the
validity of these ACH transactions without written note from AccessEZCash.Inc.”
128
ZippyCheck.com, based in Nevada, claims that Navy and Air Force members qualify for a slightly
higher credit rating than Army or Marines, due to “the fact that we have found that the Navy and Air
121
https://ssl2.securehost.ws/zippycheck/SSL/SSL_ZippyPolicies.asp, visited 8/26/04.
122
www.paydaycity.com/requirements.php, visited 8/17/04, page 3.
123
www.top-rated-cash-advance-company/legal.asp, visited 8/23/04.
124
www.fcash.com, visited 8/30/04.
125
www.quikmoneyonline.com/frameset.html, visited 8/23/04.
126
www.aeroadvance.com/privacy.asp, visited 8/11/04
127
200Cash.com, Inc. Master Agreement, on file with author.
128
www.paydayadvanceonline.com.faq.html, visited 8/30/04.
30
Force are much less tolerant of their members defaulting on a PaydayCash Advance, and because these
branches of the military are more willing to help ZippyCheck in its collection efforts.”
129
Some Internet payday loan agreements authorize the lender to convert the electronic withdrawal to
a paper check which the lender will attempt to collect if a consumer withdraws authorization for an ACH
transaction. The lender uses the information from the MICR line of the faxed check or the application
entry to produce a check-like instrument called a pre-authorized draft or a demand draft. Although the
loan was offered over the Internet, the use of a paper demand draft to collect on the loan triggers the legal
provisions of the state’s Uniform Commercial Code.
Security and Privacy Risks of Internet Payday Lending
Applying for a payday loan online is extremely risky for consumers. A customer cannot be sure
she is dealing with the same company if she returns to a web site. Domain names become available to be
sold to new owners, making it difficult for consumers to know if they are dealing with the same entity.
Besides not knowing who or where the lender is located, difficulty in enforcing consumer protection laws
or compliance with state licensing requirements, these financial transactions expose consumers to identity
theft and loss of privacy and control over personal financial information. All Internet payday loans
involve transmitting bank account numbers, Social Security numbers, name and address, and extensive
other personal information to a distant lender. One lender advises consumers with debit cards to copy the
front and back of the card to fax to the lender.
130
These personal financial documents are an identity
thief’s jackpot of information needed to apply for credit in the borrower’s name and other unauthorized
uses. Privacy Rights Clearinghouse advises consumers that e-commerce shopping by check or debit card
leaves consumers vulnerable to bank fraud and with less protection than credit cards provide.
131
Security
risks are high when this information is transmitted over unsecured web links, when it is faxed to
companies unknown to consumers, and when posted privacy policies give carte blanch to web sites to
make any use it wants of consumer information.
The president of the Electronic Payments Network, a division of Clearinghouse, the largest private
check processing system owned by large banks, told the Washington Post that “One of the most
dangerous things a consumer can do on a Web purchase when they are dealing with someone they had no
prior relationship with is to give out a bank account number.” He advised using a credit card, instead,
which comes with more consumer protections and “doesn’t give crooks access to your financial assets.”
132
Payday lenders are subject to federal law on security and privacy of financial information. For
purposes of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“G-L-B”), the Federal Trade Commission is responsible for
enforcing privacy and security rules with non-bank financial institutions. Payday lenders are required to
provide privacy policies just as banks, insurance companies and securities firms are under G-L-B. They
must give consumers the right to opt out of the sale of customer data to third parties. The only
information that financial institutions are prohibited from disclosing to third-party nonaffiliated
companies is the consumer’s bank account number or access code. If a company sells customer
129
www.zippycheck.com/Zippy_appproval.asp, visited 8/26/04. This site also permits borrowers with overdrawn bank
accounts to apply for loans.
130
www.loan-till-payday.com/how it works.asp, visited 8/16/04.
131
Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, Fact Sheet 23: Online Shopping Tips, www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs23-shopping.htm.
132
“Keep Close Watch on Bank Accounts,” Washington Post, A 8, 7/19/04.
31
information to third party nonaffiliates, it must give consumers the right to opt out of information
sharing.
133
The FTC’s Safeguards Rule requires financial institutions to safeguard customer records and
personal information collected during customer transactions, including names, addresses and phone
numbers, bank and credit card account numbers, income and credit histories, and Social Security
numbers. Each company must have a written information security plan describing its program to protect
customer information. An employee must be designated to coordinate safeguards, identify and assess
risks to customer information and contract with service providers to implement the safeguards. (See
www.ftc.gov) Consumers have no way of knowing if Internet payday loan sites fully comply with the
financial privacy and security requirements of G-L-B.
Phishing is the latest tactic used by crooks to get consumers to divulge account numbers and
passwords or PINs so that bank accounts and credit cards can be looted. The typical Phishing scam
involves an email purporting to be from a well-known company, such as Citibank, PayPal, or EBay,
telling consumers to click on a link to visit the company’s web site to provide account numbers and PINs.
The links take consumers to the thief’s site where that information is collected and used to steal from
financial institutions and their customers. The National Consumers League reports that ID thieves trick
people into providing their Social Security numbers, financial account numbers, PIN numbers, mothers’
maiden names and other personal information by pretending to be someone they are not.
134
The group
advises consumers not to click on a link in an e-mail that asks for personal information, since the link may
deliver information to identity thieves.
Internet payday loan e-mails induce consumers to click on an embedded web link to go to a site
promising $500 with no credit check. A consumer has no way of knowing if the Internet payday loan site
is a legitimate, albeit expensive, lender or a site set up just to con consumers out of their bank account
information in order to steal identities.
Electronic Fund Transfers Rules and Debit-Based Payday Lending
With store-based payday lending, loans are based on paper checks held for future deposit. Loans
based on check holding have been transformed to debit holding for Internet payday lending. Loans based
on electronic access to the borrower’s bank account involve an additional set of legal and self-regulatory
factors. All payday loans made via the Internet are electronic fund transfers between the payday lender’s
bank and the borrower’s bank account. Two sets of protections and requirements apply to these
transactions: Federal Electronic Funds Transfer Act/Reg E (EFTA) requirements and the voluntary self
regulation rules imposed on banks by the National Automated Clearing House Association rules that in
some cases provide more protections for consumers.
Consumer protections under the Electronic Fund Transfers Act/Reg E and the NACHA rules do
not easily fit the use of electronic fund transfers to make payday loans or collect payments when the loans
are due. Neither of these regulatory regimes were written with electronic payday loans in mind and do
not provide financial institutions or consumers with clear rights, protections, or recourse. Consumer
133
Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, Fact Sheet 24: Protecting Financial Privacy in the New Millennium: The Burden is On You.
www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs24-finpriv.htm.
134
www.phishinginfol.org/materials.html, visited Nov. 14, 2004
32
complaints and inquiries focus on collection tactics using the ACH system, whether a borrower can stop
payment or withdraw authorization for the payday lender to withdraw funds from their bank accounts,
how to get a dispute resolved, and risks of fraud and unauthorized transfers. NACHA’s rules for
electronic collection of returned checks also may apply to payday loans based on debits.
Electronic Fund Transfers Act and Reg E
EFTA/Reg E is the law/regulation that applies to debit card use, direct deposit of paychecks, and
payday loans made via the Internet when information from the borrower’s check is used to access a bank
account in the name of the borrower.
135
An electronic fund transfer is the movement of “money,” or
credits, from one account to another through an electronic medium.
136
Consumers applying for payday
loans online either fax a paper check to the lender or enter check account information in an online form.
Reg E applies to both types of transactions, since the consumer authorizes the transaction as an ACH
transaction and the paper check is only a source document.
137
Some Internet payday loans are
“preauthorized debits” under contracts that make loan renewals automatic on the borrower’s next payday
unless the consumer takes a separate action to have full payment withdrawn from her bank account.
NACHA Rules
All payday loans made via the Internet are delivered and collected through the electronic funds
transfer system, called the Automated Clearinghouse. The National Automated Clearinghouse
Association is a private entity made up of the banks that use the ACH Network and its rules bind the
banks on both ends of the Internet payday loan transaction, prescribing security requirements and other
protections that benefit consumers. Since account agreements signed by consumers typically require them
to comply with NACHA rules, consumers are also covered by these industry self-regulatory provisions.
NACHA rules require the lender to get the borrower’s authorization before transmitting most types of
ACH debit entries and set out the requirements for that authorization. The payday lender must be able to
furnish its bank with the original or a copy of the borrower’s authorization to access her bank account to
credit the loan and debit the payment through the ACH Network.
138
NACHA rules also require security
and fraud-prevention steps when the ACH system is triggered online and sets out procedures for revoking
authorization to credit/debit accounts.
NACHA has two sets of rules that apply to Internet payday lending, depending on how consumers
give authorization to access their bank accounts. If the authorization is provided online through clicking
on an “I agree” or “I accept” button, NACHA’s WEB
139
rules apply. If the borrower faxes in an
authorization for the lender to access her bank account, the prearranged payment and deposit entry
135
EFTA and Reg E do not apply to payday loans that start as a paper check that is later converted to an electronic withdrawal
from the borrower’s bank account. Although some iPDL sites ask consumers to fax a copy of a canceled check as part of the
loan application, the paper check is used only to provide the MICR number for accessing the account electronically, not to
process a paper check.
136
Christoslav. E. Anguelov, et al, “U.S. Consumers and Electronic Banking, 1995-2003,” Federal Reserve Bulletin, Winter
2004, p. 2.
137
Reg E Commentary 3(b)-1(v) and 3(b)-3.
138
NACHA Operating Guidelines 55, F3.
139
“A WEB entry may be transmitted by an Originator pursuant to an authorization that is obtained from the Receiver via the
Internet to effect a transfer of funds from a consumer account of the Receiver.” NACHA Rule 2.10.1
33
(PPD)
140
rules seem to apply. PPD transactions cover both credit (payday loan proceeds deposited into
the borrower’s checking account) and debit (payment of loan principle and finance charges to payday
lender) transactions and can be repeat transactions with a standing authorization or a single transfer.
141
WEB Rule Requirements:
Security: Since a web site that captures bank account information exposes consumers to greater fraud and
security risks, NACHA rules say that WEB ACH companies must use at least 128 bit encryption
technology prior to transmitting banking information, including the Receiving bank’s routing number,
account number, and PIN or any identification symbol.
142
Merchants are supposed to use commercially
reasonable systems to detect fraudulent transactions and to verify that routing numbers are valid.
143
All
payday loan applications filed online with the surveyed lenders included transmission of the applicant’s
bank account number among other information. In addition, bank account information was entered into
online forms that were transmitted to lenders electronically but authorization was signed on paper and
faxed back to the lender. Although account information was transmitted online in both methods, the
NACHA WEB security requirements apparently don’t apply in the second case.
The payday lender must have physical security to protect data and protect against unauthorized access and
use of data and network security. The payday lender’s bank has the same obligations and must establish
the identity of the merchant and the merchant’s creditworthiness on an ongoing basis. The merchant’s
bank is required to set exposure limits and to periodically review the merchant’s entries relative to the
exposure limit.
144
It is unclear how banks comply with this requirement with off-shore online lenders.
Consent: Internet initiated entries (WEB) require the merchant (payday lender) to have a consumer’s
consent to access the bank account to deposit the loan proceeds and to withdraw payment. The
authorization must contain evidence of a consumer’s identity and consent. The authorization has to be
clearly labeled as such, and conspicuously displayed on a computer screen or visual display. If the
transaction is a one-time payment, the lender doesn’t have to tell the consumer how to revoke
authorization, presumably because the merchant is expected to process the payment immediately. In the
case of a payday loan initiated via the Internet, there is typically up to a two-week delay between
authorizing the transaction and the withdrawal of the payment from the consumer’s bank account.
PPD Rule Requirements:
NACHA rules for prearranged payment and deposit transactions:
Notice: If the amount of a recurring debit is more or less than the recent one, the payday lender is
required to send the borrower a written notice of the amount of the entry and the date when the debit will
be initiated. This situation could arise when the borrower permits the payday lender to withdraw the
140
“PPD Entry means a credit or debit entry … initiated by an organization pursuant to a standing or a single entry
authorization from a Receiver to effect a transfer of funds to or from a Consumer Account of the Receiver.” NACHA Rule
13.1.44
141
ACH Rule 13.1.44 and Rule 13.1.57.
142
2003 Operating Rules, Subsection 2.10.2.4 Security of Internet Session, www.achrulesonline.org/viewrules.asp?page=10,
visited 4/22/03.
143
Consumer Banking and Payments Law/2004 Supplement, National Consumer Law Center, p. 54.
144
NACHA Rule 2.10.2.2.
34
finance charge over a succession of paydays or opts for the repayment of partial principal and finance
charge. With the typical payday loan cycle of two weeks or less, an Internet payday lender complying
with the NACHA rules for PPD transactions would have to immediately notify the borrower of the
amount of the payment scheduled for the next electronic withdrawal. No such advance notice would be
required for a one-time PPD Entry.
Access to Funds: The consumer’s bank must make loan funds available for withdrawal by cash or other
use no later than the settlement date of the entry. If the payday lender’s ACH operator makes a PPD entry
available to the borrower’s bank by 5:00 p.m. on the banking day prior to the settlement date, the loan
credit has to be available to use at the opening of business on the settlement date.
145
Prohibition on Required Electronic Payment as a Condition of a Loan
The EFTA prohibits “any person” to require, as a condition of the extension of credit, repayment
by the means of preauthorized electronic fund transfer.
146
Under the Federal Reserve’s Reg E rules, this
prohibition applies to recurring electronic payments. While some payday loans are single transactions,
those that permit multiple payments should be subject to this prohibition.
Some surveyed sites apparently do not permit borrowers to withdraw authorization to debit
accounts. The 200Cash.com agreement states: “This authority is to remain in full force and effect until
200Cash.com, Inc. and the Financial Institution have received written notification from the customer of its
termination in such time and in such manner as to afford 200Cash.com, Inc. and the Financial Institution a
reasonable opportunity to Act on it.” But, the contract also states “You understand and agree that you
may revoke this ACH/EFT authorization only after all payments are completed and 200Cash.com, Inc. is
paid in full.” This agreement could be construed as requiring that the loan be repaid electronically.
Another contract says: “I agree to….keep my account open to allow all ACH/EFT and/or bank drafts to
Americash Advance to occur in a timely manner for the scheduled due date.”
Liability Limits and Unauthorized Use of Debits
EFTA protections that apply to debit cards also apply to payday loans made via the ACH system.
If the debit is unauthorized, a consumer is not liable for lost funds if she notifies the financial institution
within 60 days of getting the periodic statement on which the unauthorized debit first appears. To be able
to prove a transaction was not authorized or was for the wrong amount, a borrower has to be able to print
out and keep copies of loan authorization documents.
Stopping Payment on Debits
Reg E does not give consumers the right to stop payment for a single debit. However, Reg E,
205.10(c) “Consumer’s Right to Stop Payment” requires financial institutions to honor an oral stop-
payment order made at least three business days before a scheduled recurring debit. If the debit item is
resubmitted, the financial institution must continue to honor the stop-payment order. Reg E gives the
145
NACHA Rule4.4.1 sets the opening of business as the later of 9:00 a.m. or the time the consumer’s bank teller facilities
including ATMs are available for customer account withdrawals.
146
15 U.S.C. 1693K. Reg E limits this protection to credit extension with preauthorized payments that recur at substantially
regular intervals.
35
example of suspending all subsequent payments to the payee-originator until the consumer notifies the
institution that payments should resume. In the case on online payday loans, this means that consumers
have the right under Reg E to stop payment if the loan is structured with automatic renewals
(preauthorized debits) but not if the loan must be repaid on the next payday.
On the other hand, NACHA rules give consumers a right to stop payment if they order the stop in
time to give their bank a reasonable opportunity to act.
147
Since payday loans are deposited into the
borrower’s bank account by the next day, the window of opportunity to stop a deposit is very brief but the
borrower has several days to stop the withdrawal to repay the loan. Consumers do not have a private right
of action directly to enforce NACHA rules, however.
Withdrawing Authorization for Electronic Transactions
Reg E permits consumers to withdraw authorization for an electronic transaction by “notifying
institution holding the account orally or in writing at least three business days before the transfer is
scheduled.”
148
The consumer’s bank can require that the consumer supplement the oral notification with a
written confirmation of the stop payment order within fourteen days of the oral notification. Once a
financial institution has been notified that the consumer’s authorization is no longer valid, it must block
all future payments for the particular debit transmitted by the designated payee originator and may not
wait for the payee-originator to terminate the automatic debits. The consumer’s financial institution may
confirm that the consumer has informed the payee-originator of the revocation, for example by requiring a
copy of the consumer’s revocation as written confirmation to be provided within 14 days of an oral
notification. If the bank doesn’t get this confirmation within the 14-day period, it may resume honoring
subsequent debits to the account.
149
Under NACHA rules, a consumer can also withdraw authorization to access her bank account if
recurring payments are involved. NACHA rules require that the merchant’s authorization form include
the notice that consumers can revoke that authorization. A consumer has to contact the merchant directly
and follow the instructions in the authorization agreement. The next step is to inform her bank that she
has revoked authorization. The consumer will be asked to sign a form under pain of perjury that
authorization has been revoked directly with the merchant in order for the consumer’s bank to return the
merchant’s attempt to withdraw funds from the consumer’s bank account.
150
Presumably this right only
applies to Internet payday loans where the contract authorizes interest only payments on the borrower’s
next payday or installment payments. If the payday loan is a single WEB transaction, the authorization
doesn’t have to include revocation language and the consumer has no right to revoke these one time
payments despite the fact that the debit will not take place until the payday loan is due in a week or
two.
151
147
NACHA Rule 7.4
148
C.F.R. 205.10(c)
149
Reg E, Official Staff Commentary, section 10(c).2.
150
ACH Guidelines II, ch. I.B.3 at OG 21.
151
ACH Guidelines, II, ch. I,B.3 at OG 22.
36
Multiple Presentments to Collect Checks Electronically
When a paper check or electronic equivalent is returned for insufficient funds, NACHA rules
impose limits on the number of times a lender can attempt to collect the check through electronic means.
The ACH entry can be reinitiated no more than two times after the first attempt is returned, for a total of
three attempts.
152
If a lender charges $25 per returned transaction, a consumer unable to repay the loan on
its due date will owe an additional $75 in return fees in addition to the NSF fees charged by her bank.
Since banks are currently charging $20 to $35 per returned check, a consumer can easily owe an
additional $150 when unable to repay a payday loan collected through the ACH system. When lenders
fail to follow the NACHA three-presentment limit, fees escalate.
Some payday loan contracts in the study sample include agreements that the lender can send
additional ACH entries if the first one is returned for insufficient funds or cannot be completed. A typical
agreement says that a consumer authorizes the lender to initiate debits to your account in amounts up to
and less than the amount owed until the amount owed is paid in full. Typically the lender adds a $25
insufficient funds fee for every payment request returned by the consumer’s bank. As a result, Internet
payday loan companies can use the ACH network to repeatedly ding the consumer’s bank account,
triggering bounced check fees each time the debit is returned for insufficient funds.
Collecting NSF fees Through the ACH Network
NACHA rules for handling returned checks (RCK) electronically also provide some consumer
protections. RCK rules require that consumers give written authorization prior to the lender initiating a
debit entry to the consumer’s account in order to use the ACH Network to collect a fee associated with a
check or ACH entry returned for insufficient funds. This protection exceeds Reg E requirements for
written authorization only for pre-authorized recurring payments.
Enforcing NACHA Rules
NACHA rules do not give consumers a right to enforce them. All commercial parties using the
ACH Network have to agree to be contractually bound by the rules and the typical deposit agreement a
consumer has with her bank provides that the consumer agrees to be bound by the NACHA rules. It is
possible that consumers can file a lawsuit against any party that violates NACHA rules, but this is not
certain.
153
Consumers can also file complaints with their bank regulator, their state Attorney General or
the Federal Trade Commission.
Consumers who believe NACHA rules have been violated to withdraw funds without their
approval should file an “Affidavit of Unauthorized ACH Withdrawal” form at their bank. If the
withdrawal was unauthorized, the consumer’s bank must promptly recredit the disputed amount. Under
NACHA rules, consumers must report the error within 15 days in writing and under penalty of perjury.
For example, if the payday lender has attempted to collect payment more than three times, triggering more
than three bank NSF fees, the victim should demand a refund of the excess penalty fees triggered by this
152
2003 Operating Rules, Section 2.12 Re-initiation of Returned Entries by Originators,
www.achrulesonline.org/viewrules.asp?page=10, visited 4/22/03.
153
Mark E. Budnitz, “Payday Lending Meets Electronic Commerce,” Conference of State Bank Supervisors Payday Lending
Regulatory Summit, June 7, 2004, p. 4.
37
violation of NACHA rules. NACHA rules require the consumer’s bank to promptly re-credit the
consumer’s account if the consumer claims the debit was unauthorized.
154
This consumer right applies in
situations where the merchant failed to comply with requirements for getting the consumer’s consent; and
when the debit is greater than the amount agreed to.
Complaints about EFTA/Reg E
Consumers must notify their bank of any unauthorized transactions within 60 days of receiving a
bank statement. Under EFTA, consumers are not liable for unauthorized electronic withdrawals if they
report it within 60 days to the bank. After that time limit, consumers can lose all funds in their bank
accounts plus any overdraft lines. In addition, complaints should be filed with the consumer’s bank
regulator and with the Federal Trade Commission.
Recommendations
States should preserve and strengthen state usury laws and/or small loan rate caps and prohibit loans
based on check holding or electronic access to consumers’ bank accounts.
Failing an outright ban on loans based on electronic access to consumers’ bank accounts, states should
amend small loan and payday loan laws to explicitly apply to loans made via the Internet and other
electronic means with in-state consumers in order to provide a consistent level of consumer protections
for loans made to consumers. States should prohibit choice of law provisions that make the laws of other
countries or state applicable to loans.
State credit regulators and the Federal Trade Commission should investigate the Internet payday loan
industry to enforce state credit laws and interest rate limits and federal credit and financial privacy laws.
The Electronic Fund Transfers Act should be updated to extend consumer protections to ACH-enabled
credit transactions not envisioned when the law was enacted. Industry self-regulatory rules for the ACH
system should be revised to fit payday loans applied for and delivered and collected online.
Advice to Consumers
Do not borrow money at triple-digit interest rates with unrealistic repayment terms. If you pay $90 to
borrow $300 and take out twelve two-week loans a year, you will have paid $1,080 to use $300 for half
the year.
Do not send personal financial information or bank account information via the Internet or by fax to an
unknown company. Safeguard bank account numbers, Social Security numbers and other identifiers.
If payday lenders already have access to your bank account, revoke that authorization in writing and
notify your bank in writing to stop processing ACH withdrawals. Immediately report any unauthorized
transactions to your bank. File a complaint at your bank if the lender returns the same check/debit more
than three times.
154
NACHA Rule 7.6.1.
38
Seek out lower cost and less risky alternatives to payday loans to cope with a financial emergency, such
as real overdraft protection, arrangements with creditors, borrowing from friends or relatives, or help from
religious institutions.
Compare the cost of borrowing money, based on both the dollar finance charge and the annual percentage
rate, and only borrow as much as you can repay during the term of the loan.
Build up savings and seek credit counseling and budgeting assistance to avoid high-risk debt.
File complaints about Internet payday lending with state credit regulators or the Attorney General. Seek
legal help from private attorneys or legal services offices.
39
Appendix A: CFA Internet Payday Loan Survey Methodology and Sampling Protocol
Survey Methodology:
CFA staff surveyed a sample of popular Internet payday loan sites. The sample was originally selected in
July and August 2003, and updated with additional sites in 2004. Almost ten percent of the original
sample of sites were no longer functional or accepting new loan applications by August 2004 and were
deleted from the survey. The researcher collected information on the loan offer, the disclosures of cost
and repayment terms, application information, and privacy and security policies, if any. We noted any
contact or location information, claims about applicable law or jurisdiction, and states where loans were
or were not available. We collected information on key contract terms from the sites where applications
provided this level of information, including mandatory arbitration clauses.
CFA did a Who Is search for each web site’s URL in an effort to identify the owner of the web site. The
surveyor did not enter any personally identifiable information but filled out application forms with
nonsense information in order to progress through websites from entry application to full application. We
checked for indicators of a secure site when submitting application pages that contained bank account
information or personal financial data, including a Social Security Number.
CFA attempted to verify claims that Internet lenders were licensed/registered in their home states by
reviewing posted lists of licensed payday loan companies and by calling state regulators. The home states
used were those identified in choice of law provisions, claims of licensee status or address information
and not those revealed by the Who Is search. We were still unable to determine the licensing status of
several lenders after checking web site information against posted lists of licensed lenders.
Selection of Surveyed Sites
The total sample included 100 sites, gathered from online directories and various searches on popular
search engines. Sites that referred to physical storefronts but did not offer loans directly through the site
were not included in the survey.
We logged onto Yahoo Directory: Business and Economy>Shopping and Services> Financial Services>
Credit and Finance> Financing> Cash Advances. The most popular site listings yielded nine sites, with
one site leading to a storefront payday lender. The tenth site from this source was selected at random
from the alphabetical list of sites that followed the most popular list.
Also from that directory, we chose ten sponsored links, a few from the sponsored listings and then several
sponsored sites that were listed in the alphabetical site list section below.
The second directory was the Google Directory: Business> Financial Services> Loans > Payday Advance
Services. The top ten pages yielded some duplicate results with the Yahoo Directory site listings and
thus, other site listings from the directory were obtained from searching the sites listed underneath the top
ten, but rounding out the top thirty.
40
The next source was the Payday Loans Index. After looking at the ten sites with the highest number of
hits, several were duplicate sites, thus some site listings were pulled from their featured payday providers
index (2), and their general payday loan providers index(2).
The next source was a general search of Google, under “payday loans.” The top ten results yielded four
new site listings, with the remaining six listings under this search coming from the top 60 results.
Under this same search, we gathered site listings of sponsored links on Google. The sponsored sites that
were listed along with the top ten results yielded 80% results. Two more sites were collected after a
subsequent search of payday loans on Google a few weeks later.
A Google search under “cash advance” yielded another six sites out of the top ten results. Four more site
listings were obtained from the top 110 results.
Another search was conducted using Google under “quick cash.” This search resulted in only one new
site listing with the other nine coming from subsequent searches, with one site obtained from the 91-100
th
results.
A Yahoo search for “payday loan” yielded site listings taken from 80 results. In spring of 2004, we used
the new “Froogle” shopping service on Google to look for payday loan websites and added new listings.
A small sample of payday loan web sites advertised through unsolicited commercial email rounded out
the sample of 100 sites.
41
Appendix B: Surveyed Lender Key and Summary Chart
Company: Name on website given for company
URL: Website address on home page or initial page for company name.
WHOIS Name: Owner of domain name. WHOIS search conducted by using www.verisign.com
and noting the registrar names for those sites registered with another domain
registry, such as TUCOWS or GoDADDY. The ultimate registrar was used to
gather WHOIS information.
WHOIS Location: Where the site’s domain registration location is listed, from WHOIS profile.
Address: Checked if a physical address for the payday lender is posted on the web site and
available to consumers before entering personal information in application forms.
E-mail: Checked if e-mail address for the payday lender is posted on the web site.
Phone: Checked if a phone number for customer service is posted on the web site.
FAX: Checked if payday lender provides a fax number for sending applications.
Get Loan In: Web site claims on states where loans are not available or specific states where
loans are made.
Choice of Law Web site claims on state law that applies to transactions. Information typically
located under Terms and Conditions, Legal Disclosures, or on the home page.
Licensed Claim: States where lenders claim to be licensed.
Licensed: States where CFA was able to confirm that the company is licensed, using state
regulatory licensee lists and phone calls to regulators. Name in which license is
held where available.
42
Company URL WHOIS Name
WHOIS
Location
Address
Email
Phone
Fax
Get Loan In
Choice
of Law
Licensed
(claim)
Licensed
Primary
123onlinecash www.123onlinecash.com
Internet Cash Advance
Marketing, Inc. Canada
200cash.com Inc. www.200cash.com Degnanco DE DE DE Unclear
500FastCash www.500fastcash.com
Internet Cash Advance
Marketing, Inc.
Canada
ABC Cash Advance Inc.
www.cash-advance-payday-
loans.tv N/A N/A
Access EZ Cash Inc. www.paydayadvanceonline.com Tony Freiberg CA
N/A in ND, KA,
MN, NE
Yes, DBA Access EZ
Funding, Inc.
Ace Pays Inc. www.acepays.com
Ace Check Cashing,
Inc. PA N/A GA PA Unclear
Advance Paycheck Now www.advancepaychecknow.com Brian Hughes CA
AeroAdvance Financial www.aeroadvance.com
AeroAdvance Financial,
Inc./ Jon Sanchez CA CA
Yes, DBA Aerofund
Financial, Inc.
Americash Advance LLC www.americashadvance.com
Americash Advance,
LLC
DE DE Yes*
Avantis Financial, LLC www.avantisfinancial.com Avantis Financial LLC SD SD SD Yes
Cash Advance Man www.cashadvanceman.com CashAdvanceNow.com FL
N/A in AR, FL,
IL, NE Unclear
Cash Advance Now www.cashadvancenow.com CashAdvanceNow.com FL
N/A in AR, FL,
IL, NE
Unclear
Cash Advance USA www.cashadvanceusa.com
Liberty Capital
Investments FL Unclear
Cash by Morning LLC www.cashbymorning.com
Cash By Morning/ Mark
Tischler DE DE Yes
Cash N Minutes www.cashnminutes.com
Instant Lease/ Chad
Rounds TX
Cash Net www.cashnet500.com
CRA Services/ Adrian
Rubin PA UT Unclear
Cash Oncall of America Inc. www.cashoncall.com
Cash On Call Of
America, Inc. NV NV only NV NV Yes (DBA Payday Loan)
CashBack Payday Loans Inc. www.cashbackpayday.com Cashback Payday Loans NV
N/A in AK, GA,
NY NV Yes
CheckExpress.com www.checkexpress.com
CheckExpress.com/
Dino Tagnani CA NV Unclear
Dollar Advance www.dollaradvance.com Peoples Payday FL Unclear
EfastAdvance www.efastadvance.com eFastMedia.com KS
Emergency-Cash-Loan.com www.emergency-cash-loan.com Domains by Proxy, Inc. AZ
N/A in NY,
KA,CO,GA,ID Federal Yes
Empowerment Lending Inc. www.ms-payday-loans.com Ms Payday Loans, Inc. DE US and Canada Unclear
EZ Payday Cash www.ezpaydaycash.com
Ezpaydaycash.com c/o
Network Solutions VA UT UT
Yes (DBA United
Consumer Fin. Services)
Fast Bucks www.fastbucks.com
Fastbucks,
Fastbucks.com c/o
Network Solutions VA NM Yes
Fast Cash Online www.fastcashonline.com Fast Cash Online.com NV US, Canada Yes
43
Company URL WHOIS Name
WHOIS
Location
Address
Email
Phone
Fax
Get Loan In
Choice
of Law
Licensed
(claim)
Licensed
Fast Funds Online www.fast-funds-online.com
Internet Cash Advance
Marketing, Inc. Canada Unclear
Fast Payday Cash Loans
Online/ Island Financial
www.fast-payday-cash-loans-
online.com
Jordan Robbins/ Long
Island Web Page Design NY
Fcash Inc. www.fcash.com Neteller/ Brad James Canada
First Choice Financial
Services Inc.
www.yourcashbank.com
United Capital / Marc
Matthews
UT
N/A in
AK,HI,NM,NY
Yes (DBA Capital
Investments, Inc.)
GetCash911 http://getcash911.com
Advance Check
Express, Larry Felt CA
Gold X www.goldx.com Gold Exchange CA Unclear
Inajin Enterprises dba Axcess
Cash www.loan-til-payday.com Jon Schultz NV*
Max Out Payday Loans Inc. www.maxoutloan.com .Com Endeavors Inc. OR All 50 States
Mycashnow.com www.mycashnow.com mycashnow.com Inc. Grenada N/A in KS Grenada
MyPaydayloan.com www.mypaydayloan.com
Roxan Sofia Lao
Mendez
Costa
Rica Costa Rica
National Opportunities
Unlimited Inc. www.itsyourpayday.com NOU DE DE DE Yes
National Payday www.nationalpayday.com Devidia II Ltda
Costa
Rica Costa Rica
Online Payday Advance www.onlinepaydayadvance.com Daniel Joye AL
Pay Day One XL LLC www.paydayone.com PayDay One XL TX Yes
PayAdvance LLC www.payadvance.com PayAdvance LLC CA CA CA Unclear
Payday City www.paydaycity.com
Liberty Capital
Investments FL Unclear
Payday Connection www.paydayconnection.com Domains by Proxy, Inc. AZ N/A in DE, GA DE DE Unclear
Payday Loan Cash Advance
Ltd.
www.payday-loan-cash-
advance.com
Payday Loan Cash
Advance Online IA US and Canada Unclear
Payday Loan Corporation www.paydayloan.com
Payday Loan
Corporation
CA CA, NV only NV
CA,
NV
Yes (CA)
Paydayloan-Paydayloans
www.paydayloan-
paydayloans.com Internet Manager OK DE Unclear
PayDayOK www.paydayok.com PayDay One XL TX
Get in NM et al,
N/A NY et al
NM Yes
Power Cash Advance www.powercashadvance.com Domains by Proxy, Inc. AZ
Quick Loot www.qloot.com DMA Financial Inc. NV NV Unclear
Quik Money Online www.quikmoneyonline.com
GFC Groups, Inc./ Paul
Gallo
CA CA Unclear
Quik Payday www.quikpayday.com Quik Payday Inc. UT UT UT Yes
Rapid Cash Provider www.rapidcashprovider.com Azoogle, Inc. Canada
Sonic Cash LLC www.soniccash.com
Jason Brizendine/ Sonic
Cash LLC ID ID ID Yes
44
Company URL WHOIS Name
WHOIS
Location
Address
Email
Phone
Fax
Get Loan In
Choice
of Law
Licensed
(claim)
Licensed
Top rated cash advance
company
www.top-rated-cash-advance-
company.com
Domains by Proxy, Inc. AZ
N/A in
NY,KS,CO,GA,I
D Federal Yes Yes (DBA Rio Resources)
UnitedCashLoans www.unitedcashloans.com
Internet Cash Advance
Marketing, Inc. Canada Unclear
US Advance www.usadvance.com
Pan American Advance
Ltda
Costa
Rica
Fed. Of
Saint Chris
Your Cash Network www.yourcashnetwork.com
Internet Cash Advance
Marketing, Inc. Canada Unclear
ZippyCheck Inc. www.zippycheck.com No Spam NV NV NV Yes
Referral
Advance Cash Loans www.advancecashloans.com Manager CO
Cash Advance and Payday
Loans Online
http://jowston.org N/A N/A
Cash Advance Fast www.cashadvancefast.com Benjamin Thomas LLC FL
Cash Advance Loans www.aceoffice.org N/A N/A
Cash Advance Services
www.cash-advance-
services.com
Happy Days Services FL
Cash Advance, LLC www.cashadvance.com Ward Chandler Canada AZ Unclear
Cash Payday Advance www.cash-payday-advance.com N/A N/A
Cash Payday Loans www.cash-payday-loans.com Domain Manager IA
CashInAClick.com www.cashinaclick.com Intermark Media NY
Cash-in-1-Hour.com www.slcash.com
ezbusinessdomains.com
LLC NV
Delaware Financial Lenders www.internetfastcash.com Domains by Proxy, Inc. AZ DE Yes
Epaychecks.com www.epaychecks.com
Advance Online
Services
CA
Fast Cash Advance Payday
Loan
www.fast-cash-advance-payday-
loan.com BCB TX State List
First Payday.com www.firstpayday.com Domains by Proxy, Inc. AZ DE Unclear
Get Payday Advance www.getpaydayadvance.com eXtreme Traffic, LLC NV
iCreditCentral Inc. www.icreditcentral.com Domains by Proxy, Inc. AZ US, UK, Canada
iEmergency Loans www.iemergencyloans.com iBusinesses.com, LLC LA Unclear
Instant Cash Advance www.magcalc.com Web Check Services CA
Instant Cash USA www.moneybyfax.com CR Services Corp PA
Instant Payday Loans www.instant-payday-loans.us N/A N/A
Loan Me Cash www.loan-me-cash.com ISN, Inc. TX
Online Payday Loans www.payday-loans.org N/A N/A
Overnight Payday Loan
www.overnight-payday-
loan.com
OPL
CA
45
Company URL WHOIS Name
WHOIS
Location
Address
Email
Phone
Fax
Get Loan In
Choice
of Law
Licensed
(claim)
Licensed
Paychecks in Advance www.paychecksinadvance.com LHMR, Inc., Ryan Fiore FL
Payday Advance at Payday
Direct
www.paydaydirect.com Web Check Services CA
Payday Cash Advance www.everythingoz.com Payday Cash Advance WY
Payday Center www.paydaycenter.com Payday Center CA
Payday Loan Advance www.advance-payday-loan.com Web Check Services CA
Payday Loan Cash Advances
www.payday-loan-cash-
advances.com
Benjamin Ogden/
Benjamin Thomas LLC FL
Payday Loans at Variety
Zone www.varietyzone.com Variety Zone CA
Payday Loans Online
Services www.payday-loans.ws N/A N/A
Payday Loans Overnight
www.paydayloans-
overnight.com Paydayloans Overnight CA
Payday-Loans-Now.com www.1paydayadvance.com
Payday-Loans-
Now.com/ Michael
Gibbons
PA Unclear
Payday Now www.payday-now.net Matt Richenthal NY
PayDayRightAway www.dioceseofvermont.net
NorthWind Hosting
Solutions/ Phillip Ma NY
Quick Cash Loan.org www.quickcashloan.org N/A N/A
Quick Payday Loans www.quick-payday-loans.com quick-payday-loans.com Canada
Quickest-Payday-Loan.com www.1000paydaycash.com Domains by Proxy, Inc. AZ
N/A in
NY,KS,CO,GA,ID Federal Unclear
Secure Cash Advances www.secure-cash-advances.com Secure Cash Advances CA
US Payday Loan http://www.uspaydayloan.com Michael Gibbons PA All 50 States NM NM Unclear
We Give Cash www.wegivecash.com wegivecash.com, LLC NV
Your Fast Cash http://yourfastcash.com
Internet Cash Advance
Marketing, Inc. Canada Unclear
46
Appendix C: Survey Summary Chart on Loan Terms and Limits Key
Company: Name on website given for company
URL: Website address on home page
Max Loan: The largest amount of money the lender will give to a borrower. First time
borrowers typically are not able to borrow the maximum. After prompt payment of
one or more loans, the lender allows customer to borrow the maximum.
Max Term: Sites set the due date for loans as the next payday. Some stipulate that the due date
can be either the next payday or a period not to exceed a certain number of days.
Fee/$100 The amount of money it costs to obtain a $100 loan. Disclosures found in FAQs, in
click-on charts or “Legal Disclosures” that a consumer can view without divulging
personal information in an application.
APR/$100 If an APR disclosure was provided, this is the interest rate disclosed for a $100 loan
for a two-week (14/15 day) period. This is not an APR computed by CFA.
NSF/Other Fees: Fee posted for payments returned for insufficient funds. Failure to post a fee does
not mean the site or actual lender does not charge a fee.
Rollover: Posted repayment terms. “Yes” means web site permits borrowers to pay the
finance charge to extend the loan for another pay cycle without limiting the number
of times. The number of rollovers permitted is posted where given.
Secure Site: Application page is secure, as shown by https on browser or closed lock on screen
when application is sent. Claims of security seals listed. Asterisk used for referral
sites when the surveyor clicked through to an application page at another URL for
the actual lender.
47
Company URL
Max
Loan
Max
Term
Fee/$100 APR/$100
NSF/Other
Fees
Rollover
Secure
Site
Primary
123onlinecash www.123onlinecash.com $500 Yes No
200cash.com Inc. www.200cash.com $200 15 days
$60 for
$200 652%/$200 $25 4 Yes
500FastCash www.500fastcash.com $500 Yes No
ABC Cash Advance Inc. www.cash-advance-payday-loans.tv
$200 (1st
time)
15 days $30 4
No, Claims
Thawte
Access EZ Cash Inc. www.paydayadvanceonline.com $245 15 days $15 + $10 414% $15 Yes Yes
Ace Pays Inc. www.acepays.com $30
No, Claims
SSL
Advance Paycheck Now www.advancepaychecknow.com $500 30 days $17.65 460.16% Yes Yes, GeoTrust
AeroAdvance Financial www.aeroadvance.com $500 Payday $20 MD 434.52% MD $25 Yes Yes
Americash Advance LLC www.americashadvance.com $1,000 15 days $25 651.79% $25 4 Yes, GeoTrust
Avantis Financial, LLC www.avantisfinancial.com $500 Payday $30 $30 4 Yes*
Cash Advance Man www.cashadvanceman.com $500 15 days $25 651.79% $25 Yes No
Cash Advance Now www.cashadvancenow.com $500 15 days $25 651.79% $25 Yes No
Cash Advance USA www.cashadvanceusa.com $500 15 days $25 651.79% $25 Yes No
Cash by Morning LLC www.cashbymorning.com $1,000 20 days $30 Yes
No, Claims
Secure
Cash N Minutes www.cashnminutes.com $500 14 days No
Cash Net www.cashnet500.com $1,000 Payday Yes No
Cash Oncall of America Inc. www.cashoncall.com $1,000 Payday $17.65
429.48%/15
day $25 Yes, Verisign
CashBack Payday Loans Inc. www.cashbackpayday.com $500 $25 651.79% 4 Yes, Thawte
CheckExpress.com www.checkexpress.com $500 30 days $17.50 17.50% $15 Yes Yes, VeriSign
Dollar Advance www.dollaradvance.com $500 15 days $25 651.79% $25 Yes No
EfastAdvance www.efastadvance.com $500 Payday $25 Yes
Yes,
unlimited
No
Emergency-Cash-Loan.com www.emergency-cash-loan.com $1,000 17 days $30 782.14% 4
No, Claims
Secure
Empowerment Lending Inc. www.ms-payday-loans.com
10-30%
Income
Payday $20-30 Yes Yes, Thawte
EZ Payday Cash www.ezpaydaycash.com $1,000 30 days $25 651.78% $20 2
Yes, Verisign
and Thawte
Fast Bucks www.fastbucks.com $500 $25 651.79% Yes Yes
Fast Cash Online www.fastcashonline.com $2,500 $20-30 Yes, Thawte
Fast Funds Online www.fast-funds-online.com $500 Yes No
Fast Payday Cash Loans Online/ Island
Financial www.fast-payday-cash-loans-online.com $500 Payday Yes Yes
Fcash Inc. www.fcash.com $200 15 days $25 608.33% $25 Yes Yes
First Choice Financial Services Inc. www.yourcashbank.com $500 Payday $25 + $10 No NSF Yes, Verisign
GetCash911 http://getcash911.com $500 30 days $17.50 17.50% $15 Yes
No, Claims
SSL
Gold X www.goldx.com $300 Payday No
Inajin Enterprises dba Axcess Cash www.loan-til-payday.com $1,000 37 days $30 782.14% 4 Yes, Verisign
48
Company URL
Max
Loan
Max
Term
Fee/$100 APR/$100
NSF/Other
Fees
Rollover
Secure
Site
Max Out Payday Loans Inc. www.maxoutloan.com $500 Yes No
Mycashnow.com
www.mycashnow.com $1,000 $18.62 485.50% $25 3 Yes, Verisign
MyPaydayloan.com www.mypaydayloan.com $1,000 18 days $25 651.79% $25
Yes,
unlimited Yes, Verisign
National Opportunities Unlimited Inc. www.itsyourpayday.com $500 Payday $25
304.17% (30
day)
$20
Yes,
unlimited
Yes
National Payday www.nationalpayday.com $500 18 days $25 651.79% Yes Yes, Thawte
Online Payday Advance www.onlinepaydayadvance.com $500 15 days $25
486.67% (15
day) Yes No
Pay Day One XL LLC www.paydayone.com $500 30 days $12 312.86% $25 Yes Yes, VeriSign
PayAdvance LLC www.payadvance.com $255 Payday
$35 for
$200 443.20% $15 Yes Yes
Payday City www.paydaycity.com $500 15 days $25 651.79% $25 Yes No
Payday Connection www.paydayconnection.com $1,000 18 days $30 782.14%
4 (if loan<
500) Yes
Payday Loan Cash Advance Ltd. www.payday-loan-cash-advance.com $1,500 Payday $20-30 Yes Yes, Thawte
Payday Loan Corporation www.paydayloan.com $510 30 days $17.65 460.16%
$15(CA),
$25(NV) Yes, Verisign
Paydayloan-Paydayloans www.paydayloan-paydayloans.com $500 30 days 4 No
PayDayOK www.paydayok.com $500 24 days $10 260.71% $25 Yes Yes, Verisign
Power Cash Advance www.powercashadvance.com $500 Yes
No, Claims
SSL
Quick Loot www.qloot.com $500 15 days $25 651.79% Yes Yes
Quik Money Online www.quikmoneyonline.com $415 Payday
$30+$10/
$160 390% $25 Yes Yes
Quik Payday www.quikpayday.com $500 18 days $20 521.43% 3 Yes
Rapid Cash Provider www.rapidcashprovider.com $500 Yes No
Sonic Cash LLC www.soniccash.com $500 18 days $20 521.43% $20 3 Yes, Digicert
Top rated cash advance company
www.top-rated-cash-advance-
company.com $1,000 17 days $30 782.14% 4 No
UnitedCashLoans www.unitedcashloans.com $500 Payday Yes No
US Advance www.usadvance.com $500 16 days $30 Yes Yes
Your Cash Network www.yourcashnetwork.com $500 Payday Yes No
ZippyCheck Inc. www.zippycheck.com $1,300 14 days $20 $25 Yes Yes
Referral
Advance Cash Loans www.advancecashloans.com $500 No
Cash Advance and Payday Loans Online http://jowston.org $500 Payday
No, Claims
SSL
Cash Advance Fast www.cashadvancefast.com $500 Payday Yes No*
Cash Advance Loans www.aceoffice.org $500 No*
Cash Advance Services www.cash-advance-services.com $500 Payday
No*, Claims
Secure
Cash Advance, LLC www.cashadvance.com $500 Yes Yes
Cash Payday Advance www.cash-payday-advance.com $500 30 days
No*, Claims
Secure
49
Company URL
Max
Loan
Max
Term
Fee/$100 APR/$100
NSF/Other
Fees
Rollover
Secure
Site
Cash Payday Loans www.cash-payday-loans.com $500 Payday
No*, Claims
SSL
CashInAClick.com www.cashinaclick.com $500 Payday Yes, Verisign
Cash-in-1-Hour.com www.slcash.com $500 30 days
as low as
$10
No*, Claims
Secure
Delaware Financial Lenders www.internetfastcash.com $1,000 Payday $25 651.79% Yes Yes*
Epaychecks.com www.epaychecks.com $500 Payday
No*, Verisign
Logo
Fast Cash Advance Payday Loan
www.fast-cash-advance-payday-
loan.com $500
15-18
days $20-25 Yes
First Payday.com www.firstpayday.com $500 $25 651.79% 4 Yes*
Get Payday Advance www.getpaydayadvance.com
iCreditCentral Inc. www.icreditcentral.com Yes*
iEmergency Loans www.iemergencyloans.com $500 No
Instant Cash Advance www.magcalc.com $500 No*
Instant Cash USA www.moneybyfax.com $1,000 37 days $30 782.14% 4 Yes*
Instant Payday Loans www.instant-payday-loans.us $500 Yes
Loan Me Cash www.loan-me-cash.com $500 37 days $20 782.14% $29 4 No
Online Payday Loans www.payday-loans.org $500
No*, Claims
Secure
Overnight Payday Loan www.overnight-payday-loan.com $500 Payday
No*, Claims
Secure
Paychecks in Advance www.paychecksinadvance.com $500 18 days $30-90 Yes
No, Claims
SSL
Payday Advance at Payday Direct www.paydaydirect.com $500 No*
Payday Cash Advance www.everythingoz.com $500
No*, Claims
Secure
Payday Center www.paydaycenter.com $500
No*, Claims
Secure
Payday Loan Advance www.advance-payday-loan.com $500
No*, Claims
Secure
Payday Loan Cash Advances www.payday-loan-cash-advances.com $500
No*, Claims
Secure
Payday Loans at Variety Zone www.varietyzone.com $500 Payday
No*, Claims
Secure
Payday Loans Online Services www.payday-loans.ws $500 Payday $20-25
No
No*, Claims
Secure
Payday Loans Overnight www.paydayloans-overnight.com $500 Payday
No*, Claims
Secure
Payday-Loans-Now.com www.1paydayadvance.com $1,000 Unclear Yes*
Payday Now www.payday-now.net $500 Payday
No, Claims
secure
PayDayRightAway www.dioceseofvermont.net $500 $20-30 Yes
Quick Cash Loan.org www.quickcashloan.org $500 Payday
Quick Payday Loans www.quick-payday-loans.com $300 Payday Yes
No*, Claims
Secure
Quickest-Payday-Loan.com www.1000paydaycash.com $1,000 17 days $30 782.14% Yes 4 No*
50
Company URL
Max
Loan
Max
Term
Fee/$100 APR/$100
NSF/Other
Fees
Rollover
Secure
Site
Secure Cash Advances www.secure-cash-advances.com $500
No*, Claims
Secure
US Payday Loan http://www.uspaydayloan.com $1,000 17 days $30 782.14% 4 Yes*
We Give Cash www.wegivecash.com $1,000 Payday $10 and up
Your Fast Cash http://yourfastcash.com $500 Payday Yes No
51
Appendix D:
Terms of State Payday and Small Loan Laws for Check-Based Loans
State Min./Max Min/Max Maximum Cost/ Effective APR
155
Term Loan Fee %/$ $100 14 day
Alabama 10/31 days -/$500 17.5% of loan $17.50 455%
Act No. 2003-359
Alaska 14/ days -/$500 15% + $5 fee $20 520%
Alaska Chapter 116 SLA 04
Arizona NA $50-$500 15% of ck $17.65 459%
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 6-1251 et seq. 2000
(Arkansas) 6/31 days - /$400 ck 10% + $10 $22.22 579%
Ark. Stat. Ann. § 23-52-101 et seq. 1999. Arkansas Supreme Court ruled that fee section is invalid attempt to evade the usury
provisions of Arkansas Constitution. (Luebbers v. Money Store, Inc., et al, __ Ark. ___ 2001)
CA -/30 days - /$300 ck 15% of ck $17.65 459%
Cal. Fin. Code § 23000 to 23106
CO
156
-/40 days -/$500 20% 1
st
$300 $20 520%
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 5-3.1-101 et seq. 7.5% > $30
DE -60 days -/$500 No Limit No Limit No Limit
Del. Code Ann. Tit. 5, §961, 976, 2227, 2235A
FL 7/31 days -/$500 10% + $5 fee $15 390%
§560.401. et seq.
HI -/31 days - /$300 ck 15% of ck $17.65 459%
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 480F-1 et seq.
ID NA -/$1,000 No Limit No Limit No Limit
Chapter 46, Title 28, Idaho Code, 28-46-401 et seq.
IL -/30 days -/$400 No Limit No Limit No Limit
IL. Admin. Code tit. 38, § 110.300 et seq.
IN 14 days/ $50/$500 15% of lst $250 $15 390%
IC 24-4.5-7-101 et seq. 13% over $250-$400
10% $400-$500
155
Approximate APR without compounding
156
Colorado Deferred Deposit Loan Act enacted in 2000 replaced regulations under the UCCC. Applies to agents.
52
State Min./Max Min/Max Maximum Cost/ Effective APR
157
Term Loan Fee %/$ $100 14 day
IA -/31 days - /$500 ck $5+10% ck $100 $16.67 435%
Iowa Code § 13-533D.1 et seq. $10/$100
KS -/30 days -/$860 Scale of fees
158
$15 390%
Kan. Stat. Ann. § 16a-2-404
KY 14/60 days -/$500 ck $15/$100 ck $17.65 459%
Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 368.010 et seq.
LA -/60 days -/$350 loan 16.75% ck $20 520%
La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 9:3578.1 et seq.
MN -/30 days -/$350 loan Scale of fees
159
$15 390%
Minn. Stat. Ann. § 47.60
MS -/30 days -/$400 ck 18% ck $22 572%
Miss. Code Ann. § 75-67-501 et seq.
MO 14 /31 days. -/$500 loan 75% loan
160
$75 1,980%
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 408.500 to 408.506; Mo. Code Regs. Ann. tit. 4, §§ 140-11.030, 140-11.040
MT -/31 days $50/$300 loan 25% of loan $25 650%
Mont. Code Ann. § 31-1-701 et seq.
NE -/31 days -$500 ck 15% per $100 $17.65 459%
Neb. Stat Ann.. § 45-901 et seq. ck pro rata
NV NA % income
161
No Limit No Limit No Limit
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 604.010 et seq.
NH 7/30 days -/$500 No Limit No Limit No Limit
N. H. Rev. Stat. § 399-A et seq.
NM NA NA No Limit No Limit No Limit
N. M Stat. Ann. §58-15-1 to 58-15-31.
157
Approximate APR without compounding
158
Kansas fees: $5.50 for loans $0 to $50, 10% of loans + $5 for $50 to $100, 7% + $5 for $100 to $250, 6% + $5 for $250 -
$300
159
Minnesota fees: $5.50 for loans $0 to $50, 10% + $5 for loans $50 - $100, 7% + $5 loans $100 - $250, 6% + $5 for loans
$250 - $350
160
Total accumulated interest capped at 75% of initial loan amount for entire term of loan and up to 6 renewals.
161
Nevada: 1999 amendments prohibit loans that exceed one-third of the borrower’s expected net monthly income
53
State Min./Max Min/Max Maximum Cost/ Effective APR
162
Term Loan Fee %/$ $100 14 day
ND -/45 days /$500 20% of loan $20 520%
N D Cent. Code § 13-08-01 et seq.
OH -/6 mon. -/$500 loan 5% + $5/$50 $15 390%
Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 1315.35 et seq.
OK 12/45 days -/$500 15% up to $300 $15 390%
Okla. Stat. Tit. 59 §3101 et seq. 10% $300 to $500
OR -/60 days - No Limit No Limit No Limit
ORS 725.600 and 725.610
SC -/31 days -/$300 loan 15% ck $17.65 459%
S.C. Code Ann. § 34-39 et seq.
SD NA -/$500 No Limit No Limit No Limit
S.D. Codified Laws Ann. § 54-4-65, 54-4-66
TN -/31 days -/$500 ck 15% ck $17.65 459%
Tenn. Code Ann. § 45-17-101 et seq.
TX
163
7 days/31 days $100-$350 48% APR + $10 $11.87 309%
7 Tex. Admin. Code § 1.605 et seq. Monthly fee
Utah NA -/12 weeks No Limit No Limit No Limit
Utah Code Ann. § 7-23-101 et seq.
VA 7days/- -/$500 15% of loan $15 390%
Va. Code Ann. §§ 6.1-444 to 6.1-471.
WA -/45 days -/$700 15% up to $500 $15 390%
Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 31.45.010 et seq. 10% $500 - $700
WI NA NA No Limit No Limit No Limit
Wis. Stat. §138.09
WY -/30 days NA $30 or 20% $30 780%
Wyo. Stat. § 40-14-362 et seq.
DC -/31 days $50/$1,000 10% + fee
164
$16.10 419%
D.C. Code § 26-301 et seq.
162
Approximate APR without compounding
163
Texas Finance Commission adopted regulations effective July 9, 2000 to permit payday loans under the Texas Finance
Code § 11.304
164
DC: If included in contract, administrative fee of $5 on checks up to $250, $10 on checks $250.01 - $500, $15 for checks
$500.01 - $750, $20 on checks $750.01 - $1,000
