RELB 112 Intro to New Testament Syllabus
Last Updated: 1/10/2022 Page 5
Reading Requirements
Students are expected to read the materials listed below.
• The New Testament especially portions emphasized in the course or that are
unfamiliar to the student.
• Online lectures.
Assigned parts of the
The Seventh-Day Adventist Bible Commentary
and
An Introduction
to the New Testament
.
(See individual lectures for more information.)
Rubrics
Written Assignments Rubric
Concise, with every sentence counting;
stays close to the word limit; Not too
long or too short
Fairly concise; stays close to the word
limit; Not extremely long or short.
Excessively long or short.
Is easy to follow. Written simply and
clearly. Covers the topic neatly without
veering off. Main points are clear and
few.
Is usually easy to follow, written simply
and clearly, and stays on topic without
veering off. There may be a few too
many points or a confusing sentence or
two.
Veers off topic. It is difficult to follow
main points or grasp writer’s
meaning in large sections of the work.
Writing is disorganized. There may be
overly complex language and/or
sentences are used.
Writing shows that student knows the
material taught and can apply it
accurately in a new situation.
Writing shows that student knows
much of the material taught and can
usually apply it accurately in a new
situation.
Writing displays a failure to understand,
recall, or apply much of the material in
new situations.
Quotes used are short and used
sparingly to directly support an idea. All
quotes are correctly referenced.
Occasionally uses too many short
quotes. Most quotes are correctly
referenced; a few mistakes may be
made in some references.
Quotes bible or text-book extensively or
uses incorrect referencing.
Narrative and description is kept to the
minimum needed for analysis. Personal
reflections are not long winded or
“preachy.”
Narrative and description are a bit too
lengthy. Personal reflections are
sometimes long winded or “preachy.”
Too much narrative or description at
the expense of analysis. Personal
reflection accounts for more than 50%
of material. (Exceptions are made for
assignments specifically requesting
primarily personal reflection.)
In-depth discussion of all points;
Evident that much thought has been put
into the subject matter and writing.
Conflicting perspectives are known,
considered, and discussed. Counter-
arguments are consistently anticipated
and refuted.
In-depth discussion of most points;
Evident that some thought has been put
into the writing. Most conflicting
perspectives are known and are usually
considered and discussed. Some
counter- arguments are anticipated and
refuted.
Writing has been thrown together, lack
of evidence of thoughtfulness. Much
Fluff and Fillers. Many Platitudes. Main
points stand alone with no
consideration or fair treatment of
alternative perspectives.
Writing is clear and precise, not vague
or ambiguous. Uses accurate grammar,
syntax, spelling, capitals, and
punctuation. No text abbreviations.
The writing is usually clear. There may
be a few grammatical o
r syntactical mistakes.
Poor and inaccurate English grammar,
syntax, spelling, capitals, and/or
punctuation are pervasive. Major errors
in editing, use of slang, non-
conversational contractions, or texting
abbreviations.
Every sentence counts. All sentences
have subjects and verbs. No run-on or
incomplete sentences.
Most sentences count and have subjects
and verbs. No more than one run-on or
incomplete sentence present.
Sentences are sloppy. Several
incomplete, run-on, or rambling
sentences present.
Paragraphs are neat and separated with
no more than one main point per
paragraph.
Paragraphs are separated, usually with
only one main point per paragraph.
Paragraphs run together without regard
to individual points being made.
Structure is random.