Superior Court of California, County of San Diego
Local Rules, Effective 1/1/2024
16
3. The court does not maintain a list of qualified evaluators nor does it endorse any mental health
professional.
4. The parties are responsible for ensuring a private child custody evaluator meets all the legal
qualifications.
C. Qualifications Declaration. The parties are responsible for ensuring the timely filing of the qualifications
declaration signed by the private evaluator. Failure to ensure the timely filing of the qualifications declaration may be
considered by the court as a factor in a party’s objection related to the evaluator’s report.
D. Child Custody Evaluator’s Report. The court may consider the evaluator’s report in accordance with the
law, including proceedings indirectly related to child custody or visitation.
E. Peremptory Challenges and Challenges for Cause
1. A peremptory challenge of a private evaluator appointed by the court is not allowed.
2. A party may challenge an evaluator for cause by noticed motion upon a substantial showing that the
evaluator is biased or prejudiced against one of the parties or otherwise unable to render a fair and impartial evaluation.
F. Withdrawing from a Case. A private evaluator may petition the court to withdraw from the case for good
cause by delivering a letter addressed to the trial judge assigned to the case stating the reasons for their request. A
copy of the letter must also be served on all parties and minor’s counsel. Any objections to the request to withdraw
must be filed with the court and served on the evaluator, all parties, and minor’s counsel, within 10 court days of
notice of the petition to withdraw. Based on the court’s review of the petition and any objections, the court may
schedule a hearing or decide the matter by issuing an ex parte order. All withdrawals require a court order.
G. Ex Parte Communications. Ex parte communications between an attorney, including minor’s counsel, and
the court-appointed evaluator, are governed by Family Code sections 216 and 1818 and California Rules of Court,
rule 5.235.
H. Complaints. Complaints about an evaluator must be in writing and addressed to the supervising judge of the
family law division. Complaints must be as specific as possible in describing what the evaluator did or did not do. The
supervising judge, or his or her designee(s), will investigate, evaluate, and respond to the complaint in due course.
(Adopted 1/1/2005; Renum. 1/1/2006; Rev. 1/1/2007; Rev. 1/1/2008; Rev. 1/1/2010; Renum. & Rev. 1/1/2011; Rev.
1/1/2012; Rev. 1/1/2013; Rev. 1/1/2016; Renum. 1/1/2017; Rev. 1/1/2019; Rev. 1/1/2022)
Rule 5.11.6
Professional Providers of Supervised Visitation
A. List. “Professional provider of supervised visitation” (PPSV) means “any person paid for providing supervised
visitation services, or an independent contractor, employee, intern, or volunteer operating independently or through a
supervised visitation center or agency.” (Family Code section 3200.5 (c)(2).) A list of professional providers of
supervised visitation is available as a courtesy online through the San Diego Superior Court Professional Providers of
Supervised Visitation (PPSV) List (SDSC Form #ADM-392) (“PPSV List”). The individuals/entities have identified
themselves to the San Diego Superior Court as professional providers. The professional providers are not affiliated
with the court, and each professional provider is independently responsible for compliance with any and all applicable
legal requirements. The court does not endorse, evaluate, supervise, or otherwise monitor the professional providers.
All parties reviewing the PPSV List should concurrently review the San Diego Superior Court’s Professional Providers
of Supervised Visitation List Policy (SDSC Form #ADM-390).
B. Declaration of Qualifications. All professional providers and non-professional supervised visitation
providers (“non-professional provider” as defined by Family Code section 3200.5) must sign and file the Declaration
of Supervised Visitation Provider (JC Form #FL-324P for professional providers or form #FL-324NP for non-
professional providers), or a declaration containing the same qualifications information, before the first supervised
visit. In addition, each time a professional provider submits a report to the court, the professional provider must also
sign, serve on all parties, their attorneys, and the attorney for the child, and file a new and current declaration.
C. Qualifications. It is the parties’ obligation to investigate and know that a professional or non-professional
provider meets the statutory qualifications, training, and continuing education requirements.
D. Current Declaration of Visitation Provider. “Current” means the Declaration of Supervised Visitation
Provider (JC Form #FL-324P or NP) has been completed and signed within 10 days prior to filing the form with the
court. In the event any information contained in the Declaration of Supervised Visitation Provider (JC Form #FL-
324P or NP) has changed, an updated version must be served by the provider on all parties, their attorneys, and the
child’s attorney, and filed within 5 days of the change in information.
E. Ineligibility of Supervised Visitation Provider. In the event a provider becomes ineligible to provide
services for any reason (including but not limited to, failure to meet the qualifications and training set forth in
California Rules of Court, Standards of Judicial Administration, Standard 5.20, or Family Code section 3200.5) the