Section 7- Page 23
on January 1, 2007 than the purchase date in August. If this is the reason a purchase price is
lower than the county’s value, no adjustment should be made.
2) The owner of the vehicle paid a lower price than the county’s estimate of retail market
value, but the vehicle is in average condition. Remember that the market approach is an
estimate of market value based on sales of similar properties. If, for example, there are 50
sales of a similar motor vehicle, all of the prices of those 50 sales will not be the same.
However, the estimate of market value will be somewhere in that range of the 50 sales prices.
The end result is that some of those 50 sales will have prices higher than the actual market
value and some of those 50 sales will have prices lower than the actual market value. It is
possible that a taxpayer may be able to negotiate a sales price close to a wholesale value or
trade-in value, however the current law requires the assessor to appraise all motor vehicles at
their retail value, regardless of the actual price paid. Also, keep in mind that the invoices you
see are representative of the sales below the county’s appraisal. The county rarely receives an
appeal where the taxpayer paid more than the county’s value, however there are many sales
in this category. Sales of new motor vehicles will probably have closer sales prices while sales
of used motor vehicles will have wider variations in sale price. If this is the reason a purchase
price is lower than the county’s value, but the vehicle is in average condition, no adjustment
should be made.
3) The sales price on a taxpayer’s invoice is lower because the sale was not an arm’s length
transaction. Reasons which would disqualify a sale as being an “arm’s length transaction” are
numerous. Examples are, a forced sale or auction sale, the buyer and seller are relatives or
related businesses, a trade in allowance was not included in the sale price, one or both of the
parties involved in the transaction is governmental, a public utility, church, school, lodge, or
other exempt organization, or lending institution. Sales such as these are many times not
representative of fair market value, so caution should be taken in using these sales as such. In
general, values should not be reduced if this is the reason a sale price is lower than the
county’s value.
4) The amount on the bill of sale is not an indication of the total consideration paid for the
vehicle. If a taxpayer receives $5000 for a trade in, the $5000 should be included in the
purchase price. As we will discuss in the appraisal section, all costs should be included in the
cost basis when determining value. Dealer prep and doc fees may also be part of the total
consideration paid when a vehicle is purchased and those costs are part of the purchase price.
No owner would logically sell a vehicle, after driving it off the lot, and not attempt to recover
all of their costs in an arms length transaction. The property tax is a tax on the fair market
value of property. If the fair market value is determined using the sale price, all costs should
be included in the cost basis. One exception to this was created in 2005, which is for the
highway use tax cost. Tax assessors who use the sales price for appraisal of motor vehicles are
prohibited from including any Highway Use Tax for purposes of determining the property tax
owed on the vehicle If fair market value is determined using the market approach, which we
recommend, then sales prices of similar vehicles are used, with appropriate adjustments for
condition.