Taxation
The mobile industry is already one of
the highest taxed in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Throughout the region, mobile money
providers encounter three layers of taxation:
general taxes, such as value-added taxes;
mobile sector-specific taxes, such as excise
duties on airtime usage, and mobile money
taxes.
27
In 2018, industry concerns intensified
regarding the introduction of taxes on
mobile money transactions throughout the
region and beyond. Aected markets include
Uganda, Kenya, Zimbabwe and Gabon.
Our analysis has shown that taxing mobile
money does little to support public
finances and to advance the many positive
contributions of mobile money.
28
Moreover,
excessive taxation undermines prospective
investment into mobile money, at a time when
mobile operators already face considerable
cost pressures to enhance service quality,
expand networks and meet new regulatory
requirements. As an alternative to excessive
taxation, governments should consider
supporting the growth of mobile money
services by digitising the payment of fees,
rates, taxes and levies due from taxpayers.
Mobile money taxation in Uganda
Mobile money is an accelerator for payments
and money transfers in Uganda, with over 30
per cent of the population actively using the
service and over 200,000 jobs directly created
by the mobile money industry. As a result, the
introduction of a one per cent tax on mobile
money deposits, withdrawals, transfers and
payments by the Ugandan government in July
2018 made mobile money transactions more
expensive for a significant number of users.
While the introduction of a 10 per cent excise
duty in 2013 only aected mobile money
transaction fees, this new initiative aims to tax
both the transaction fee and the transaction
value.
The new tax had an almost immediate
negative eect: the value of P2P transactions
declined by 50 per cent within two months
of implementation while the value of all
transactions dropped by around 25 per cent.
Around 100,000 agents saw their earnings
decline by 35 to 40 per cent, and around
30,000 agents went out of business completely.
Customers have resorted to using cash or
agency banking while others are transferring
smaller amounts via mobile money. This tax will
also have an impact on mobile money account-
to-bank transfers that enable commercial banks
to capture around US $19 million in deposits,
which stand to decline. Also at risk are mobile
money use cases: 60 per cent of electricity
and national water payments are made via
mobile money; around 5,000 savings and credit
cooperatives collect deposits and disburse
microloans using mobile money; 12,000 to
15,000 farmers receive daily microloans via
mobile money; and 40,000 to 50,000 transfers
are made to refugees every month.
By attempting to introduce a tax-boosting
measure to meet fiscal targets for 2018–19,
the Ugandan government has put the existing
tax base at risk. The government has since
attempted to redress the issue by reducing
the tax to 0.5 per cent of the transaction value
of withdrawals only. However, rather than tax
mobile money transaction values directly,
the government could tax mobile money in a
less punitive manner or, even better, leverage
mobile money to increase collection of existing
taxes in a digital and ecient way.
27. Muthiora, B. and Raithatha, R. (2017). “Rethinking mobile money taxation.” Mobile for Development Blog. GSMA.
28. Ibid
27
2018 State of the Industry Report on Mobile Money