Mission

1

11/1/23

JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

FISCAL YEAR 2024 PERFORMANCE PLAN

NOVEMBER 1, 2023

The legitimacy of government depends on the fair, impartial, and reliable administration of the laws.

Courts serve the people of the state by resolving disputes, protecting individual rights and the public

interest, and delivering justice in criminal and civil cases. To ensure a just society, courts must tailor the

fair, effective, and efficient delivery of justice to fit each individual case.

For citizens to trust the judicial system they must believe that justice is truly for all. The courts are a

fundamental government service and should be easily accessible by the public. The Department’s

recently revised Mission Statement below embodies the important work of courts and probation and their

fundamental function in Colorado.

Mission

The Judicial Department works to provide equal access to justice, contribute to

public safety, and strengthen the rule of law across Colorado. Together our

courts and probation departments are committed to impartial and timely dispute

resolution; support for families, litigants, and victims; client rehabilitation; and

meaningful community engagement.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY: The authority for Colorado’s Courts is at Article VI, Colo. Const. and §13-4-101,

C.R.S.; and for Probation Services is at §§18-1.3-201 and 18-1.3-202.

2

11/1/23

COLORADO SUPREME COURT

The Colorado Supreme Court is the state's court of last resort. Decisions are binding on all other Colorado

state courts. The Supreme Court is composed of seven justices who serve ten-year terms, and the Chief

Justice is selected from the membership of justices. The Chief Justice also serves as the executive head of

the Colorado Judicial System and is the ex-officio chair of the Supreme Court Nominating Commission.

The Chief Justice appoints the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals and the Chief Judge of each of the

state's 22 judicial districts (including Denver Juvenile and Denver Probate, which are separate courts in

the 2

nd

Judicial District, each with their own Chief Judge) and is vested with the authority to assign judges

(active or retired) to perform judicial duties.

Requests to review decisions of the Colorado Court of Appeals constitute a majority of the Supreme

Court's filings. The Supreme Court also has direct appellate jurisdiction over cases in which a statute has

been held to be unconstitutional, cases involving decisions of the Public Utilities Commission, writs of

habeas corpus, cases involving adjudication of water rights, summary proceedings initiated under the

Election Code, and prosecutorial appeals concerning search and seizure questions in pending criminal

proceedings. All of these appeals are filed directly with the Supreme Court, and, in these cases bypass

the Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court also has exclusive jurisdiction to promulgate rules governing

practice and procedure in civil and criminal actions.

Colorado's attorneys are licensed and disciplined by the Supreme Court. The court's attorney regulation

system, funded by attorney registration fees, helps the Colorado Supreme Court regulate the practice of

law in Colorado through various programs. The office oversees attorney admissions, attorney

registration, mandatory continuing legal and judicial education, attorney diversion and discipline,

regulation of the unauthorized practice of law, and inventory counsel. In addition, the court oversees the

State Court Administrator, Board of Continuing Legal Education, and the Board of Law Examiners.

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS

The Colorado Court of Appeals is the state's intermediate appellate court and consists of 22 judges who

serve eight-year terms. The Court sits in three-member divisions to decide cases. The mission of the Court

of Appeals is to provide the citizens of Colorado with clear, impartial, and timely resolutions of appealed

orders and judgments as provided by law. The Court of Appeals has initial jurisdiction, with exceptions,

over appeals from the Colorado District Courts, Denver Probate Court, and Denver Juvenile Court. In

addition, the Court of Appeals has appellate jurisdiction over decisions originating from several state

administrative boards and agencies. Review of the Court of Appeals’ decisions are directed to the

Colorado Supreme Court.

COLORADO TRIAL COURTS

Established pursuant to Article VI of the Colorado Constitution, Colorado’s state trial courts consist of

county courts, district courts, and water courts. Colorado is divided into 22 judicial districts. District

boundaries generally align with county borders; however, except for four districts, most districts are

Major Functions of the Department

3

11/1/23

comprised of multiple counties. There are currently 196 district judges serving within Colorado’s 22

judicial districts. District judges preside over felony criminal matters, civil claims in any amount, juvenile

matters (including adoption, dependency and neglect matters, juvenile delinquency, and paternity

actions), probate, mental health, divorce proceedings, and water cases. Additionally, district judges

handle appeals from Colorado municipal and county courts, and review decisions of some administrative

boards and agencies. Within the 2

nd

Judicial District, Denver Juvenile and Denver Probate courts operate

independently from the District Court. These two courts have limited jurisdiction over juvenile and

probate matters respectively.

Colorado’s county courts serve the citizens of each county in the state. County judges handle cases

involving serious public safety issues such as misdemeanor cases, felony advisements, setting bonds, and

preliminary hearings. There are 114 county court judges. County judges also issue restraining orders in

cases involving domestic violence arrest, issue search warrants, and preside over traffic cases and civil

actions involving no more than $25,000.

The Water Right Determination and Administration Act of 1969 created seven water divisions according

to drainage patterns of various rivers in Colorado. Each water division is staffed with a division engineer,

appointed by the state engineer; a water judge, appointed by the Supreme Court; a water referee,

appointed by the water judge; and a water clerk, assigned by the district court. Water judges are district

judges appointed by the Supreme Court and have jurisdiction in the determination of water rights, the

use and administration of water, and all other water matters within the jurisdiction of the water divisions.

PROBATION SERVICES

Adult and juvenile probation supervision is provided in all 22 of Colorado’s judicial districts. This includes

23 probation departments with over 70 separate probation offices throughout the state. Probation also

provides victim services and writes presentence investigation reports for Colorado’s Courts. Probation

continues to work to identify and utilize assessments, processes, and programs that enhance public safety,

are cost effective and lead to positive outcomes for the probationer and the community.

OFFICE OF THE STATE COURT ADMINISTRATOR

Colorado Courts and Probation, with more than 300 judges and 3,600 support staff members, is centrally

administered by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. To assist the Chief Justice, the Supreme Court

appoints the State Court Administrator (SCA). Each of the State's 22 Judicial Districts (and Denver Juvenile

and Denver Probate courts) also has a Court Executive and a Chief Probation Officer, and each of the 64

counties has a Clerk of Court.

The State Court Administrator’s Office (SCAO) provides administrative support and services to the trial

courts, appellate courts, and probation to assist them in providing the citizens of Colorado meaningful,

speedy, and economical forums to resolve disputes. It also supports the management of probation

services to enhance public safety and offender rehabilitation.

In executing its constitutional and statutory duties, the office has the following functions: to provide

administrative and technical support to the appellate courts, trial courts and probation; to provide

centralized policy guidance; to develop and implement standards and guidelines; to serve as an advocate

4

11/1/23

in obtaining necessary resources from the legislature; to provide services in an accurate, timely and

equitable manner. Business processes and technologies are consistently under evaluation for

improvements throughout the Department to improve efficiency and to make the courts more accessible

to the citizens of Colorado.

5

11/1/23

PRINCIPLE 1: Provide equal access to the legal system and give all an opportunity

to be heard.

Barriers to access range from difficulties navigating court and probation facilities to a lack of information

on how to obtain accommodations for people with disabilities or those with limited English proficiency to

inadequate resources to assist self-represented parties with their procedural questions. Such barriers may

compromise effective and meaningful access to the court system.

GOAL 1a. Identify and address barriers to effective participation.

GOAL 1b. Maintain safety in all court and probation facilities.

GOAL 1c. Assist self-represented parties.

PRINCIPLE 2: Treat all with dignity, respect, and concern for their rights and

cultural backgrounds, and without bias or appearance of bias.

As Colorado’s population continues to diversify, so does the population that participates in the court

system. It is important that judges and judicial staff be aware of the values of a wide number of cultures

and life experiences, and, when appropriate, make accommodations. Courts and Probation are working

to ensure that the courts are free from both bias and the appearance of bias, meeting the needs of

increasing numbers of self-represented litigants, remaining receptive to the needs of all constituents,

ensuring that court procedures are fair, understandable and accessible, and providing culturally responsive

programs and services.

GOAL 2a. Collect feedback from court users, victims of crime, and those on probation regarding their

experience with court and probation services.

GOAL 2b. Train all court and probation employees in communication, cultural competency, and

customer service skills.

PRINCIPLE 3: Promote quality judicial decision-making and judicial leadership.

Court practices and case management procedures should be as uniform as practicable to avoid confusion

and uncertainty. Courts and Probation must provide ongoing professional development, education, and

training to address many concerns including the increasing complexity of court practices and procedures

in court operations and interactions with the public. Maintaining professional excellence will promote

public trust and confidence in the judicial system as a whole.

GOAL 3a. Employ effective case management strategies.

GOAL 3b. Incorporate evidence-based principles in judicial decision-making.

GOAL 3c. Employ accountability methods to ensure court orders are being enforced and monitored.

GOAL 3d. Develop systems that assure court-appointed persons are providing quality services.

GOAL 3e. Train and educate judicial officers on an ongoing basis.

GOAL 3f. Implement professional development and leadership programs for staff.

PRINCIPLE 4: Implement quality assessments and community supervision of adult

and juvenile probationers to demonstrably enhance public safety and respect for

victim rights.

Principle Strategies & Goals

6

11/1/23

The Division of Probation Services strives to reduce offender recidivism through the application of the Eight

Principles of Effective Intervention. Probation Services promotes accountability and responsiveness in its

enforcement of the court’s orders while affecting long-term behavior change in offenders.

GOAL 4a. Ensure the accuracy and efficiency of pre- and post-sentence assessments; and provide

comprehensive assessment information to assist judicial officers in making more informed decisions,

leading to improved and less costly outcomes.

GOAL 4b. Employ evidence-based practices in all applicable areas of probation.

PRINCIPLE 5: Cultivate public trust and confidence through the thoughtful

stewardship of public resources.

In serving the people of Colorado, Courts and Probation must also exercise its constitutional and statutory

authority and responsibility to plan for, direct, monitor, and support the business of the system and to

account to the public for the system's performance. The fulfillment of this role is only possible when the

other branches of government and the public have trust and confidence in the system. In order to retain

trust and confidence, the system must be accountable to the people it serves by providing a fair and open

process, communicating clear and consistent expectations for all who participate in that process, and

being good stewards of the resources appropriated to it for the fulfillment of its mission.

GOAL 5a. Utilize the most effective and cost-efficient methods to conduct the business of the courts

and probation.

GOAL 5b. Employ new and enhanced technology solutions for managing judicial business.

GOAL 5c. Share information and data with other governmental entities and the public, while balancing

privacy and security concerns.

GOAL 5d. Ensure transparency of court and probation services operations.

GOAL 5e. Maintain a strong and well-trained workforce.

7

11/1/23

Mission, Vision, and Values Updates

Between January and July 2023, a team of 50 Judicial Department employees and judges met to create

new mission, vision, and values statements for the Department. The group included court and probation

personnel from every judicial district and from every level of the organization. The group met 6 times and

worked collaboratively to create the final statements. After the first draft from the workgroup was

complete, it was shared with leadership in every district and at the State Court Administrator’s Office

(SCAO) for feedback. Feedback was incorporated into a final set of statements that garnered the support

of leadership around the state. The mission, vision, and values statements were approved by the Supreme

Court during the summer of 2023. The Judicial Department is now working on plans to bring the

statements to life in its day-to-day work. The new statements are as follows:

• Mission: The Judicial Department works to provide equal access to justice, contribute to public

safety, and strengthen the rule of law across Colorado. Together our courts and probation

departments are committed to impartial and timely dispute resolution; support for families,

litigants, and victims; client rehabilitation; and meaningful community engagement.

• Vision: The Colorado Judicial Department strives to be a trusted and transparent leader in the

pursuit of justice across the state, serving our communities with integrity, and providing fair and

equitable access to the judicial process.

We are committed to empowering our employees through open communication, fostering a

community of trust in a supportive and innovative workplace.

• Values:

To act with…

o Integrity- To be trustworthy, diligent, and accountable, holding ourselves to a high

standard of excellence in service.

o Fairness- To be impartial and respectful in our actions, procedures, decisions, and

treatment of all.

o Transparency- To provide visibility on how decisions are made to stakeholders both inside

and outside of the Department through regular and clear communication.

To be…

o Inclusive- An organization that is compassionate and accessible to the public, and that

provides our employees with safe and equitable working environments.

o Collaborative- An organization that works with our partners and prioritizes operating with

a cooperative mindset to achieve Department goals.

o Innovative- An organization that is designed to be flexible and creative to meet the ever-

changing needs of the public and our employees.

Environmental Scan

8

11/1/23

Weighted Caseload Studies and Updates to Models

The Judicial Department utilizes weighted caseload models to assess the number of judicial officers and

staff required for efficient court operations, minimizing delays, and ensuring high-quality public service.

The Department contracts with external vendors to conduct studies that produce these models. A

weighted caseload study analyzes and evaluates the amount of time that different types of cases take to

process. A weighting system is applied to assign different workload values to cases based on specific

criteria or factors. For example, higher weights are assigned to specific categories of cases that require

significantly more time (e.g., homicide).

The Department utilizes five weighted caseload models to assess workload impacts and personnel needs:

the Court of Appeals model, the district judicial officer model, the county judicial officer model, the court

staff model, and the probation model. Two of these—the Court of Appeals and district judicial officer

models—were actively studied in FY23 and are moving towards implementation. The court staff model

study is currently underway, and the county judge model is preparing to undergo a study in FY24 for

implementation in FY25. These efforts are significant undertakings for the Department, which aims to

refresh the weighted caseload models at intervals of five to seven years. The weighted caseload studies

will provide valuable information on personnel needs and shifting workload impacts from legislation

across the state.

Implementation of 23

rd

Judicial District

Effective January 1, 2025, a 23

rd

judicial district will be created through the division of the existing 18

th

judicial district. The 23

rd

judicial district was created by House Bill 20-1026 and will include Douglas, Elbert,

and Lincoln counties, leaving Arapahoe county in the 18

th

. To aid the transition, the Chief Justice appointed

an administrative judge for the 23

rd

judicial district who serves a role similar to the chief judges for existing

judicial districts. The administrative judge has filled the two senior employee positions for 23

rd

by hiring a

chief probation officer and court executive. The 23

rd

judicial district’s leadership team is meeting with

leadership in the 18

th

judicial district, SCAO leadership, and an SCAO project manager on a regular basis

to discuss and strategize for the transition. SCAO Information Technology Services has made significant

progress setting up systems to be ready for the 23

rd

judicial district going live. SCAO Court Services,

Probation Services, and Financial Services continue to meet with leadership in the 18

th

and 23

rd

districts

to review staffing and budget splits. Finally, an independent consulting firm has been contracted to assist

with change management in both districts and serve as a liaison between SCAO and the districts.

Senior Judge Program

Senior judges are retired state court judges and justices who contract with the Judicial Department to

perform temporary judicial duties in the trial courts and the Court of Appeals. At the request of the courts

statewide, the Senior Judge Program assigns senior judges to hear cases in which the sitting judges have

recused themselves under C.R.S. §13-1-122; or to provide coverage so the court’s docket is not

interrupted due to the illness, unexpected absence, parental leave, judicial vacancy, judicial training and

education, or an overscheduled docket when a judicial officer is double set. The program added thirteen

new senior judge contracts between July 1, 2022, and June 30, 2023, representing an increase in 540

senior judge contract days to be utilized in the trial courts and 120 senior judge contract days in the Court

of Appeals. The program will continue to add new senior judge contracts in the months to come as

9

11/1/23

additional retirees become available to serve. In the month of June 2023 alone, senior judges provided

approximately 1,500 hours of coverage for courts statewide. This means that on any given workday, there

were roughly eight senior judges providing coverage to the courts across the state.

During FY23, senior judges presided over 150 court trials and jury trials in judicial districts statewide. In

addition, senior judges support trial courts by covering dockets to allow sitting judges to handle trials.

During FY23, senior judges supported over 64,000 cases in trial courts statewide.

Court User Survey

From FY07 through FY19, SCAO—in partnership with judicial districts—distributed a paper “Access and

Fairness Survey” to parties, attorneys, witnesses, jurors, law enforcement, observers, and others to ask

about their experience of procedural fairness and access in the trial courts. The survey process previously

involved court employees handing out paper surveys to court users inside courthouses for a set period of

time. The survey was temporarily suspended during FY20 and FY21 due to the COVID-19 public health

emergency. In FY22, the survey was redesigned based on extensive research on survey methods,

interviews with staff who distributed the survey, and analysis of available tools. In FY23, the Department

piloted the redesigned survey in five judicial districts: the 1st, 4th, 8th, 9th, and 12th. The survey was

expanded statewide on October 1, 2023.

Now called the “Court User Survey,” the revamped version surveys court users on procedural fairness,

service quality, and asks for input on actionable improvements. The research-based questions were tested

and approved by a cross-sectional group of judicial personnel.

The Court User Survey is distributed electronically through automatic emails to parties after hearings, QR

codes on business cards and signs in courthouses, weblinks on local courts’ webpages, and judicial

personnel directing people to the survey. Distribution using requestable paper surveys was piloted,

deemed unsuccessful, and abandoned. Additional distribution methods are being tested for potential

implementation after statewide rollout. The results of the survey during the FY23 pilot are represented in

the management strategies and measurements section of this report. Over 70% of survey participants had

a positive view of the interactions they had with the trial courts.

Implementation of Mediation in Eviction Cases

On June 6, 2023, Governor Polis signed House Bill 23-1120 (HB23-1120) into law. HB23-1120 requires a

landlord and residential tenant to participate in mediation prior to the landlord commencing an eviction

action in Colorado courts if the tenant receives supplemental security income, federal social security

disability insurance, or cash assistance through the Colorado works program (collectively, "cash

assistance"). The bill requires mediation to be scheduled within 14 days of a request by a landlord.

The SCAO Office of Dispute Resolution (ODR) immediately began implementing the Act by updating

Judicial Department forms and scheduling mediation with trained ODR contract mediators. ODR is

currently implementing an improved application for ensuring eligibility and scheduling mediations within

the 14-day timeframe. During the month of June 2023 (the end of FY23), ODR contract mediators

conducted mediations in 30 cases. From June to September 2023, ODR contract mediators conducted

mediations in a total of 175 cases with varying degrees of effectiveness.

10

11/1/23

One unforeseen challenge for ODR staff has been the need to provide disability accommodation for a

significant proportion of parties before a case is filed. Generally, the courts only provide accommodation

support after a case is filed. ODR is working on how to continue to address these challenges.

Sealing of Criminal Records

SCAO has already implemented much of Senate Bill 22-099 (SB22-099), Sealing Criminal Records and is

working on implementing the remaining components. Currently, SCAO Court Services and Information

Technology Services staff are working on implementing the automatic process for the sealing of some

criminal convictions outlined in CRS 13-3-117. Requirements, exclusionary criteria, sufficient points of

reference for identification and validation, and procedural components have been established for the

entire sealing process. Although non-drug felonies do not need to be included until July 1, 2025, these

cases have been incorporated in the process design ahead of schedule. The logistics of the process for

district attorneys to object to the record being sealed is also complete. Currently, programming work is

being done by SCAO Information Technology Services to generate the list of eligible cases, and to create

the automated process that will seal the cases, transmit data to the Colorado Bureau of Investigation, and

generate and serve the order to seal. Steps have been taken to establish clear protocols for data sharing

with external stakeholders to ensure transparency, consistency, and efficient communication. This

includes creation of forms for the Judicial Department and the public to use, coding for automation and

tracking purposes, and communication with Colorado District Attorney Council (CDAC) to ensure the

process is also available to district attorneys. SCAO is also working to ensure proper data is collected to

fulfill annual reporting requirements on implementation progress, and to convey information between

Denver County Court and Denver District Court. One aspect of the reporting requirement is to list how

many cases result in objections to sealing, and the reasons for those objections. Based on conversations

with CDAC, data regarding objection reasons cannot be provided to SCAO in a way that is reportable.

Therefore, at this time, SCAO does not anticipate being able to report on objection reasons, but it will

report this information if it is provided in a reportable format. SCAO will report data on the number of

objections.

The creation of the website where a defendant can confidentially check if their case has been sealed under

13-3-117 must be complete by July 1, 2024, and some work has been done on this. Sufficient points of

identification have been established to ensure proper use of the website. Website elements including the

structure, verbiage, and FAQs that cover issues such as what to do if a record is not returned in a search

have been created. The website will use plain language and a glossary for terms that may not be commonly

understood. The website will also refer defendants who have Denver County Court cases to Denver

County Court directly.

Expansion of Virtual Proceedings and Livestreaming

The Judicial Department continued to solidify its use of virtual proceedings in FY23 by significantly

expanding infrastructure and creating parameters around the best uses of virtual proceedings outlined in

Chief Justice Directive 23-03.

By September 1, 2023, the Judicial Department brought 355 livestreaming channels of criminal

proceedings online to implement the requirements of House Bill 23-1182 (HB23-1182), which requires

11

11/1/23

criminal proceedings to be remotely observable if there are sufficient resources and the proceedings are

not privileged or protected. As the Department’s web conferencing platform did provide sufficient

resources to hold virtual proceedings and to allow remote observation, the Department implemented a

livestreaming platform that allows non-participatory observation of proceedings. To facilitate the

effective implementation of HB23-1182, the Chief Justice issued Chief Justice Directive 23-02 to provide a

framework for livestreaming criminal proceedings, protecting the integrity of proceedings, and providing

appropriate levels of privacy for participants in the criminal justice process. Livestreams are open to the

public for virtual viewing of criminal proceedings without participation in the proceedings to facilitate

public access without interruption or decay of virtual proceedings. Since September 1

st

, as many as 84

channels have run concurrently, with as many as 142 viewers at one time and 31 viewers watching a single

channel. The Judicial Department expects livestreaming to be a valuable tool to enable public access to

proceedings while ensuring high-quality processing of cases. However, the Department has begun to

experience periodic issues with its network bandwidth. The Department will continue to evaluate the

source of the bandwidth issues, but at this point it is believed that the rapid expansion of livestreaming is

contributing to bandwidth interruptions that impact court proceedings.

Implementation of Accessible Website

The Judicial Department has been running a multi-phase project to meet the requirements of House Bill

21-1110 (HB21-1110), Colorado Laws for Persons with Disabilities. Currently, under the Colorado Anti-

discrimination Act (CADA), it is unlawful for any person to discriminate against an individual with a

disability. HB21-1110 adds new language that specifically applies this standard to government information

technology and expands the state's information technology accessibility standards to include all

individuals with disabilities, as defined by the ADA, instead of just people with vision problems. All

technology, hardware, and software, that is both public-facing and internal-facing including any

technology provided by or procured by a government entity that is used by the public or used by a

government entity employee is subject to these new requirements. This includes websites, applications,

kiosks, digital signage, documents, video, audio, and third-party tools. The Office of Information

Technology (OIT) has statutory authority in C.R.S. 24-85-101 to establish statewide accessibility standards

that all state agencies, including Judicial, must comply with by July 1, 2024.

The Judicial Department provides services to constituents through online services, applications, and third-

party tools. The Judicial Department was not adequately prepared, skilled, or budgeted for the digital

transformation necessary to comply with HB21-1110 and has been working to update all technology used

by the 22 judicial districts, SCAO, and the appellate courts. The scope of changes will impact every

employee and member of the public who interacts with the courts or probation. In FY23, a supplemental

budget request was approved for contractual help with expertise in the field of accessibility to inventory

digital assets, assess remediation needs, and determine training needs for Judicial staff.

The contractor has found over 8,000 digital assets that must be made accessible, with more being created

daily. The inventory has content of all formats that will require their own remediation needs and methods

with specialized training and tools. Ownership of the inventory is scattered across the Department, which

will require a significant and strong focus on change management, governance, and training to meet the

requirements of HB21-1110.

12

11/1/23

To address this multi-faceted, complex, and large project, help is once again being contracted from

industry leaders in accessibility to implement the change management, governance, remediation, and

training. This will occur at great expense and under expedited timetables to make a conscious effort to

comply with requirements by July 1, 2024, although Judicial will continue to adapt, learn, and implement

improvements in years to come to ensure the courts and probation are accessible to all.

48-Hour Bond Hearing Implementation

In 2021, House Bill 21-1280 (HB21-1280) was passed and required courts to hold bond hearings for

arrestees within 48 hours. House Bill 23-1151 (HB23-1151), Clarifications to 48-hour Bond Hearing

Requirement, was signed into law April 20, 2023, clarifying when the 48-hour requirement applies. Under

the bill, the requirement applies if the arrestee is held in another jurisdiction but does not apply if the

arrestee refuses to attend the hearing or experiences a health emergency. To faithfully implement HB23-

1151, the Judicial Department worked with courts and stakeholders to ensure there was shared

understanding of the changes and made necessary updates to references. Furthermore, effective October

1, 2023, individuals arrested outside the jurisdiction that issued the warrant have been brought before

the court that issued the warrant or heard by the virtual bond hearing office that is responsible for that

location to ensure district attorneys of the issuing location are provided an opportunity to argue bond for

their jurisdiction.

Since the passage of HB21-1280, bond hearings that fall on weekends have been consolidated for many

jurisdictions across the state into virtual bond hearing offices (BHOs). Two BHOs were implemented

initially, and one more BHO has been added through on a supplemental budget request so additional

courts could begin using the BHOs. To assist the faithful implementation, the SCAO Court Services Division

hired two analysts whose primary responsibility is to support the courts in their efforts to ensure that

qualifying individuals are heard within the required timeframe. The analysts supported the creation of the

third BHO, and provide:

• Continued support and problem solving for existing BHOs and non-BHO districts.

• Updates to the bond hearing instructions used by court staff, bond hearing Officers, non-BHO

districts and jail staff.

• A centralized list of Colorado sheriffs and jails in each county for outreach.

• Townhall meetings to provide resource information and guidance to all sheriffs and jail staff.

• Communication of schedules, needs and support to district attorneys, public defenders, and

alternate defense counsel attorneys.

• Continued outreach and education on the expansion of warrants being heard in the original

jurisdiction.

Between January 1, 2023, and August 30, 2023, 8,194 bond hearings occurred on weekends or holidays.

Of these cases, 2,497 bond hearings (30%) were heard in the BHOs—roughly split evenly between the two

BHO locations. The remaining cases were heard in courts not part of a BHO.

DEI in Problem-Solving Courts

Problem-solving courts (PSC) are courts that provide qualifying defendants with intensive treatment and

ongoing supervision in combination with a reduced sentence. In Colorado, they are informed by the

Statewide Problem-Solving Court Advisory Committee created by Chief Justice Mary Mullarkey in 2008. In

13

11/1/23

the fall of 2022, the Problem-Solving Court Advisory Committee asked the Technical Assistance and

Program Support subcommittee to write a set of standards for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in

problem solving courts. The standards are currently being reviewed by national partners at All RISE

(formerly known as the National Association of Drug Court Professionals), PSC judicial officers, and PSC

coordinators. The DEI Standards were developed with reference to the National Drug Court Standards as

well as the Journal for Advancing Justice and other research on problem-solving court DEI practices. The

DEI Standards will be implemented in every judicial district with a PSC and will become a part of the PSC

accreditation process, which is a rigorous evaluation that ensures that problem solving courts are meeting

high standards of quality. All problem-solving courts in the state will be required to implement and adhere

to the standards to be accredited. The standards will be reviewed and updated on a regular basis to ensure

that they meet the needs of the communities they serve.

The DEI Standards will help ensure problem-solving courts are inclusive and welcoming to all participants,

regardless of their background or circumstances. The implementation of the DEI Standards will be a

significant step toward creating a more just and equitable system of justice. They manifest a recognition

that diversity, equity, and inclusion are essential components of the success of problem-solving courts.

The implementation of the DEI Standards will be a continuous process.

In addition to the implementation of the DEI Standards, the problem-solving courts will be moving to a

new data management system that will make it easier to track DEI practices and outcomes. The new data

management system will have features that allow users to:

• Collect data on the demographics of participants in problem-solving courts.

• Collect data around equitable referral, entry, and assessment processes.

• Track the progress of participants in terms of (programmatic) DEI goals.

• Identify areas where there are disparities in DEI outcomes.

• Develop and implement strategies to improve DEI outcomes.

The new data management system will be a valuable tool to help problem-solving courts create a more

just and equitable system. It will help to ensure DEI is a central focus of the work of problem-solving

courts, and progress is made towards achieving DEI goals.

Education in the Courts & Probation

Education for trial court staff continues to be a priority for the Judicial Department. SCAO Court Services

has a team of eight court education specialists who support the majority of training for approximately

1,855 trial court staff in all 64 counties and 22 judicial districts across the state. Court education specialists

are a key resource for staff who rely on them to provide training on critical aspects of trial court staff

work, such as data entry of warrants, court orders, sentences, and other sensitive data. Trial court

education continues to utilize a hybrid training plan that includes instructor-led virtual training, on-

demand modules, and in-person training. In FY23, court education specialists offered 502 formal classes.

Additionally, they provided 476 individualized trainings for employees and judges. Individualized trainings

are generally provided for those who are new to the Judicial Department or new to their position. Court

education specialists also provided 56, six-hour new employee orientations going over the basics of case

management systems and applications, and they facilitated two in-person conferences. The Clerk of

Court/Unit Supervisor Retreat provides legislation updates and leadership development for supervisors in

14

11/1/23

the trial courts, and the Colorado Court Employee Conference provides task-focused training and

leadership training for trial court employees and probation support staff.

Although the court education specialists have leveraged all available resources and modalities to

maximize existing resources, some training needs continue to suffer due to insufficient resources. With

the large influx of new employees, the demand for training to support complex and fast-paced aspects of

the trial courts has significantly increased. This demand for more training resources was recognized during

the FY23 legislative session with the appropriation of 3 additional court education specialists and 5 new

peer training specialists for FY24. Peer training specialists will be employed by local judicial districts but

will work in tandem with the court education specialist team. The peer training specialists will provide a

new resource through hands-on localized training. The peer training specialist program is anticipated to

be expanded in future years.

Training is also a focus for probation staff. The Professional Development Unit in the SCAO Division of

Probation Services (DPS) provides required training statewide, and skill training for probation staff for

several research-informed programs and practices. A specific focus includes the development of coaching

skills for supervisors through practice opportunities (e.g., at the Probation Academy, Strategies for

Behavior Change, and Orientation to Supervision). This focus helps supervisors support probation staff as

they implement research-informed best practices. More educational experiences for leadership

development are also being explored.

Probation officers are also trained in assessment and case planning. A total of 38 local trainers

complement training from SCAO by co-facilitating; and providing booster, high-fidelity assessment, and

case plan training. SCAO Probation Services, in collaboration with local trainers and trainers from partner

agencies, continue to improve assessment and case planning training by integrating more technology and

distance learning components. The ability to use web conferencing technology has allowed staff from all

areas of the state to learn and practice without leaving their local office. Additionally, the infrastructure

of assessment and case planning learning has been collaboratively reimagined using web conferencing.

The DPS Professional Development Unit has made significant efforts to adapt to demands for new staff

training due to an increase in staff turnover and hiring. In FY23, 231 probation officers were trained in

defensive tactics, tactical awareness, and the constitutional limitations of force. Additionally, 152 new

staff were trained in research-informed best practices for effective supervision of probation clients

through the Probation Academy.

Legislative Updates in Probation

House Bill 22-1257

After the passage of House Bill 22-1257 (HB22-1257) in April 2022, the State Court Administrator (SCA)

was required to develop a system of structured and individualized behavioral responses for probation by

July 1, 2023. The system was required to include an accountability-based series of behavioral responses,

intermediate sanctions, incentives, and services designed to respond to a probationer’s violations quickly,

fairly, consistently, and proportionally, as well as to motivate positive behavior change, successful

completion of probation, and completion of individual behavioral or treatment goals. To meet these

requirements, SCAO Probation Services developed a behavioral response system called Strategies for

Behavior Change (SBC). SBC is a system used by probation officers to reinforce pro-social behaviors and

15

11/1/23

minimize technical and law violations. Probation departments are required to use the system or use an

equivalent locally developed system aligned to best practices. Three probation departments (in Denver

Adult and the 1st and 20th judicial districts) are utilizing locally developed and equivalent systems.

House Bill 22-1326

In 2022, the Legislature passed the Fentanyl Accountability and Prevention Act, House Bill 22-1326 (HB22-

1326). One requirement of the bill was anyone convicted on or after January 1, 2023, of offenses under

part 4 of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act of 2013 (C.R.S. §18-18-401 - 18-18-433) involving

fentanyl, carfentanil, benzimidazole opiate or any analog of these substances is required to complete a

fentanyl education program. The Colorado Behavioral Health Administration developed and released an

online education program to fulfill the requirements of the legislation. Probation staff have been notified

of the requirement and been provided with informational material about the program. A flyer containing

a QR code, as well as the website link for individuals to access the program, was created for probation

departments to share with clients and display in probation office lobbies.

Senate Bill 23-164

Senate Bill 23-164 (SB23-164) mandated probation staff follow the guidelines and standards developed

by the Sex Offender Management Board (SOMB) and required probation to work with the SOMB to hold

accountable probation officers who do not comply with the guidelines and standards. Staff from SCAO

met with staff from the Division of Criminal Justice (DCJ), on behalf of the SOMB, to discuss

implementation of this law. As a result, probation developed and implemented a new grievance process

that allows the public to report a probation officer’s alleged non-compliance with the SOMB guidelines

and standards. The SCAO and DCJ will be entering into a Memorandum of Understanding that will result

in collaborative discussions about resolution of the grievances demarcated by the bill.

16

11/1/23

Trial Courts

New Case Filings Overview

While the number of total filings increased slightly from FY22 to FY23, it continued a trend of filings

significantly below levels prior to the COVID-19 public health crisis. The number of traffic filings decreased

11,401 (13%), but traffic infraction filings increased 12,598 (22%). This may be due to the influence of

Senate Bill 21-271 (SB21-172), Misdemeanor Reform, which lowered the offense level for some traffic

misdemeanors, making them traffic infractions. County civil filings increased 8%, but the number of

district civil cases (minus distraint and Rule 120 cases) remained stable.

Table 1: County Court Filings by Case Class

FY14

FY15

FY16

FY17

FY18

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

Case Class

CIVIL

New Cases Filed

158,525

144,868

138,631

140,462

143,591

142,877

118,329

108,339

115,147

124,855

Cases Terminated

132,170

144,018

137,744

138,286

142,319

142,038

117,864

108,363

114,984

125,344

INFRACTIONS

New Cases Filed

69,515

70,375

69,782

66,561

65,344

65,572

63,572

50,152

56,992

69,590

Cases Terminated

67,854

71,664

70,107

66,823

65,996

65,343

60,317

53,259

57,175

68,821

MISDEMEANORS

New Cases Filed

60,585

62,131

60,682

61,298

62,589

61,951

61,550

60,490

60,331

60,466

Cases Terminated

57,193

59,852

59,799

59,396

60,748

60,108

50,519

52,188

62,340

62,918

SMALL CLAIMS

New Cases Filed

7,589

7,404

7,309

7,118

6,990

6,655

5,364

4,561

4,668

5,215

Cases Terminated

6,710

7,245

7,266

6,896

6,713

6,935

5,323

4,871

4,617

4,893

TRAFFIC

New Cases Filed

117,389

124,922

118,215

115,370

113,865

112,733

104,402

93,678

88,019

76,618

Cases Terminated

114,112

114,989

116,252

114,885

113,648

110,139

91,288

85,597

96,876

83,616

FELONY COMPLAINTS (a)

16,794

16,247

18,095

19,546

21,515

23,018

18,899

17,542

18,849

18,672

TOTAL

New Cases Filed

430,397

425,947

412,714

410,355

413,894

412,806

372,116

334,762

344,006

355,416

Cases Terminated (b)

378,039

397,768

391,168

386,286

389,424

384,563

325,311

304,278

335,992

345,592

(a) Felony complaints represent the number of criminal cases, docketed as CR, that began in county court. The processing of

felony cases varies between court locations. The counties processing CR cases hear advisements. Some counties do

preliminary hearings in county court before moving the case to district court for completion of the felony process. The case can

also be reduced to a misdemeanor and remain in county court or district court.

(b) Does not include felony complaints.

Management Strategies and Measurements

17

11/1/23

Table 2: District Court Filings by Case Class

FY14

FY15

FY16

FY17

FY18

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

Case Class

CIVIL

New Cases Filed

96,325

101,112

88,277

80,632

96,176

87,295

104,632

81,781

84,146

60,577

New Cases Minus

Distraint & Rule 120

Cases

23,757

22,800

22,614

22,713

22,897

22,883

21,050

20,582

19,179

19,182

Cases Terminated

97,728

101,355

88,758

80,917

95,618

87,015

105,175

81,049

84,600

66,684

CRIMINAL

New Cases Filed

37,966

40,903

46,004

51,775

54,479

56,292

51,378

43,834

42,955

40,252

Cases Terminated

37,615

39,343

42,730

47,998

51,258

54,573

47,714

41,489

45,771

43,265

DOMESTIC RELATIONS

New Cases Filed

34,907

34,841

34,966

35,057

34,357

33,610

30,697

31,465

31,168

30,991

Cases Terminated

35,067

34,352

34,877

34,799

34,348

33,807

31,180

31,089

30,875

30,276

JUVENILE

New Cases Filed

24,600

24,681

24,324

23,339

23,120

22,847

18,545

14,954

15,704

16,193

Cases Terminated

23,866

23,274

22,518

21,722

22,072

21,620

18,580

16,064

11,654

15,670

MENTAL HEALTH

New Cases Filed

7,072

7,326

7,689

7,947

7,933

7,779

7,533

7,798

7,120

7,459

Cases Terminated

7,072

7,408

7,731

7,905

7,994

7,804

7,765

7,887

7,086

7,268

PROBATE

New Cases Filed

15,203

15,728

16,309

16,619

16,738

16,191

15,785

17,777

18,747

18,096

Cases Terminated

15,578

15,718

16,151

16,699

16,751

16,116

16,126

17,742

18,498

17,587

TOTAL

New Cases Filed

216,073

224,591

217,569

215,369

232,803

224,014

228,570

197,609

199,840

173,568

Cases Terminated

216,926

221,450

212,765

210,040

228,041

220,935

226,540

195,320

198,484

180,750

Trial Court Management Strategies

Case Timeliness Standards

One measure the Judicial Department utilizes to monitor workload and the ability to effectively process

matters before the trial courts is to assess timeliness of proceedings, or the amount of time from the initial

case filing to June 30, 2023, for cases active on that date. Performance goals for trial courts have been

established through various means, including Chief Justice Directive 08-05 – Case Management Standards

(CJD 08-05). This directive was developed with input from judges and establishes aspirational time

processing goals for each case class. Information about each district’s progress in meeting the goals is

18

11/1/23

reported quarterly. Information for individual judges is provided to the Judicial Performance Commission

during each judge’s retention evaluation.

The statewide percentage of cases that met the timeliness standards at the end of FY23 is represented in

tables 3 and 4 below. One reason for not meeting standards may be the greater number of requirements

per case created by legislation. In addition, the district court weighted caseload study indicated that the

average amount of time spent on cases has increased for most district court case classes, and it may be

reasonable to expect the imminent county court weighted caseload study will make similar findings.

Without additional judicial officers, this necessarily decreases the number of cases that can be resolved

in a timely fashion, increasing the number of open cases at any given time.

Table 3

District Court Case Management Time Standards

Pursuant to CJD 08-05

Pending Cases

Exceeding Target

Case Class

4

th

Quarter

FY2022

4

th

Quarter

FY2023

Target

Civil

18.96%

18.84%

No more than 10% of cases

open more than one year.

Criminal

8.91%

9.24%

No more than 5% of cases open

more than one year.

Domestic Relations

6.57%

7.86%

No more than 5% of cases open

more than one year.

Juvenile Delinquency

5.01%

5.30%

No more than 5% of cases open

more than one year.

Dependency and Neglect

(over 6 years old) *

5.45%

6.78%

No more than 5% of cases open

more than 18 months.

Dependency and Neglect

(under 6 years old) *

11.32%

12.35%

No more than 10% of cases

open more than one year.

* This measure shows time to first permanency hearing. A potentially more optimal measure would be time to true permanent placement or

termination of court jurisdiction.

19

11/1/23

Table 4

County Court Case Management Time Standards

Pursuant to CJD 08-05

Pending Cases

Exceeding Target

Case Class

4

th

Quarter

FY2022

4

th

Quarter

FY2023

Target

Civil

7.38%

8.10%

No more than 5% of cases open

more than six months.

Misdemeanor

20.22%

18.16%

No more than 10% of cases

open more than six months.

Small Claims

9.47%

8.94%

No more than 1% of cases open

more than six months.

Traffic

14.94%

12.16%

No more than 5% of cases open

more than six months.

DUI/DWAI

21.27%

16.75%

No more than 20% of cases

open more than seven months.

Jury Trial Backlog

In FY23, the number of pending jury trials stabilized slightly above 10,000 cases. The number of pending

jury trials has been tracked since April 2021, and as of June 2023, the number of pending jury trials has

decreased by 30% from 14,427 to 10,047. The number of jury trials was significantly elevated during and

after the COVID-19 public health emergency when jury trials were suspended across the state.

The number of jury trials held also stabilized during FY23, indicating the Department has reached an

equilibrium between new and held jury trials.

Apr-21

May-21

Jun-21

Jul-21

Aug-21

Sep-21

Oct-21

Nov-21

Dec-21

Jan-22

Feb-22

Mar-22

Apr-22

May-22

Jun-22

Jul-22

Aug-22

Sep-22

Oct-22

Nov-22

Dec-22

Jan-23

Feb-23

Mar-23

Apr-23

May-23

Jun-23

Chart 1: Pending Jury Trials by Month

20

11/1/23

The total number of jury trials held in FY23 (2,130) increased over the number held from FY20 through

FY22, approaching FY18-19 levels.

After increasing significantly between FY20 and FY21, the number of misdemeanor and traffic scheduled

events, which primarily include hearings, decreased 8% from FY22. This is likely due to the 13% decrease

in the number of traffic cases. Some of this workload reappeared in traffic infraction cases as offenses

were downgraded from traffic misdemeanor offenses to traffic infractions.

Apr-21

May-21

Jun-21

Jul-21

Aug-21

Sep-21

Oct-21

Nov-21

Dec-21

Jan-22

Feb-22

Mar-22

Apr-22

May-22

Jun-22

Jul-22

Aug-22

Sep-22

Oct-22

Nov-22

Dec-22

Jan-23

Feb-23

Mar-23

Apr-23

May-23

Jun-23

Chart 2: Jury Trials Held by Month

1247

916

640

833

990

1392

974

545

1078

1140

FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23

Chart 3: Jury Trials Held in County & District Court by Fiscal Year, FY18-FY23

County Court District Court

21

11/1/23

The number of scheduled events in felony criminal cases also decreased 8% from FY22 to FY23.

Several factors are likely contributing to the fluctuation in scheduled events. Two significant ones are the

decrease in party failures to appear (FTAs), and the decreased number of continuances.

Chart 6 below illustrates the encouraging decrease in the number of failures to appear in felony criminal

and misdemeanor cases. From FY22 to FY23, there was a 23% decrease in the number of felony hearings

with an FTA, and a 21% decrease in the number of misdemeanor hearings with an FTA. Two elements

likely influenced the decrease. First, as Colorado moved out of the COVID-19 public health emergency,

parties may have been more likely to assume the risks associated with appearing in person, or the factors

that impeded appearances have stabilized. Second, the Department expanded the text reminder program

for defendants in criminal felony and misdemeanor cases after the passage of Senate Bill 19-036 (SB19-

756,667

731,794

830,261

835,290

772,560

174,684

165,952

154,168

148,350

137,084

FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023

Chart 4: County Court Misdemeanor (M) & Traffic (T) Filings and Scheduled

Events FY19-23

M & T Scheduled Events M & T Filings

627,326

595,304

601,150

620,135

569,887

56,292

51,378

43,834

42,955

40,252

FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023

Chart 5: District Court Criminal (CR) Filings and Scheduled Events FY19-23

CR Scheduled Events CR Filings

22

11/1/23

036), which created the program, and Senate Bill 22-018 (SB22-018), which expanded the program by

requiring defendants to opt out of receiving text reminders if they wish to decline participation.

There was also a significant decrease in the number of continuances in felony criminal and misdemeanor

cases. From FY22 to FY23, there was a 14% decrease in the number of felony criminal scheduled events

that were continued, and a 5% decrease in the number of continued scheduled events in misdemeanor

cases. The decrease in the number of FTAs likely contributed to these decreases, in addition to the

decreased risks from the COVID-19 public health emergency.

Despite these positive developments, the Judicial Department’s updated district court judicial officer

weighted caseload study indicates the amount of time needed to process felony and misdemeanor cases

is increasing. This may be due to a greater number of required processes that occur in each hearing or

71,335

85,036

89,622

89,536

85,089

77,961

133,316

132,214

120,903

103,473

FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23

Chart 7: Continuances for Scheduled Events in District Criminal and County

Misdemeanor & Traffic Cases, FY19-FY23

CR M & T

31,397

30,690

34,951

34,845

27,678

75,144

66,448

99,291

98,077

75,140

FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023

Chart 6: FTAs for Scheduled Events in District Criminal and County

Misdemeanor & Traffic Cases FY19-FY23

CR M & T

23

11/1/23

over the life of the case. In either case, the overall time required to process felony and misdemeanor cases

has not been decreasing with the decreasing number of scheduled events, FTAs, and continuances.

Court User Survey

The court user survey is another ongoing measure the Department uses to manage the trial courts. The

survey is focused on procedural fairness, service quality, and ideas for actionable improvements. An

updated version of the survey was piloted in five judicial districts (the 1

st

, 4

th

, 8

th

, 9

th

, and 12

th

) representing

urban, suburban, and rural judicial districts from across the state. The survey is being rolled out statewide

beginning October 1

st

. During FY23, 3,465 court users completed the survey in pilot districts, which is a

significant increase over distribution of the preceding Access & Fairness Survey (discussed on p. 9), which

collected 1,500-2,000 surveys annually through statewide distribution. Survey respondents included

parties, attorneys, witnesses, jurors, law enforcement, observers, and others.

Questions included several 5-point Likert-style questions which are represented in table 5 below. Most

court users were highly satisfied with the courts in the pilot districts, with over 70% of court users

providing a positive median Likert-scale response, and more than 65% providing a positive response to

every Likert-style question.

24

11/1/23

Table 5: Court User Survey Likert Ratings

Question

Average Rating

(1-5 range, with

5 being the

most positive)

Percentage 4 or

5 Rating

Number of

Responses

Did you easily find your way around the courthouse?

Asked of in-person court users

4.40

85.0%

1,829

Was it easy to use WebEx?

Asked of video conference court users after May 15,

2023

4.37

82.4%

68

Did you receive prompt help?

Asked of in person, video conference, and phone court

users

4.22

78.3%

3,019

Did you receive the language resources you

needed?*

Asked of court users who speak a language besides

English as their primary language

4.20

80.0%

25

Was the service you received done correctly? **

Asked of in person, video conference, and phone court

users

4.19

75.8%

2,228

Were the resources you needed available to you? ***

Asked of in person, video conference, and phone court

users

4.16

75.8%

823

Did staff understand your needs?

Asked of in person, video conference, and phone court

users

4.14

74.9%

3,040

Were you treated fairly?

Asked of in person, video conference, and phone court

users

4.11

73.9%

3,059

Did you to easily complete your business?

Asked of phone court users, and video conference users

prior to May 15, 2023

3.92

69.9%

1,178

Did you find the webpage you needed quickly? Asked

of website court users

3.90

66.7%

258

Did the judge/magistrate listen to your side of the

story?

Asked of parties with a hearing

3.87

68.1%

1,938

Do you trust the courts to handle business you may

have in the future?

Asked of all court users

3.86

67.8%

3,396

Did the website meet your needs?

Asked of website court users

3.76

65.4%

358

*Piloted in the 8th judicial district only, will be used statewide in FY24.

**Piloted in the 4

th

, 8

th

, 9

th

, and 12

th

judicial districts, will not be used statewide.

***Piloted in the 1

st

judicial district only, will be used statewide in FY24.

25

11/1/23

Probation Services

Colorado Probation provides community supervision for adults and juveniles sentenced to probation.

Despite Colorado’s general population growth, the number of individuals sentenced to probation has been

trending downward since FY19. There were just over 1,800 more adults sentenced to probation in FY23

(34,464) compared to FY14 (32,663) and 1,600 fewer juveniles sentenced to probation in FY23 (1,822)

compared to FY14 (3,458). After experiencing a sharp decline in probation sentences during the COVID-

19 public health emergency, new sentences to probation have remained steady at this lower level.

Probation’s population has evolved significantly in the last ten years. For the largest population, adults on

regular supervision, the proportion of those with felony and misdemeanor convictions has remained

consistent. Approximately a third of adults sentenced to probation, in any given year, have a felony

conviction. After peaking in FY19 with almost 14,000 adults with felony convictions entering probation

(34% of new adult probationers), the number has decreased. In FY23, only 11,000 adults were sentenced

to probation with a felony conviction (32% of new adult probationers) and just over 22,800 were

sentenced to probation with a misdemeanor conviction. It’s likely current population trends reflect a

combination of factors including lasting impacts of the COVID-19 public health emergency, statutory

changes (e.g., the decriminalization of some drug crimes, changes in theft amounts and impaired driving

offenses), and system changes to the juvenile and adult criminal justice system.

Longer-term trends show slight increases in the total number of new probations. Since FY14, Colorado

has seen increases in the number of males and females sentenced to regular probation, while the

percentage of each have remained steady: in FY14, 26% of new, regular adult probationers were female

(8,566) and 74% were male (24,077). Similarly, in FY23, 26% were female (8,792) and 74% were male

(25,627). Additionally, over the last ten years, the young adult regular probation population has shrunk

while the remainder of the adult population (especially 25-50+) has steadily increased. In the last ten

years, the number of probationers in the 18-24-year-old category decreased 30% from 8,317 in FY14 to

5,853 in FY24. In contrast, the number of probationers in the 25-50+ range increased 18% from 24,342 in

FY14 to 28,611 in FY23.

8,566

8,792

24,077

25,627

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23

Chart 8: New Adult Probationers by Gender

FY14 to FY23

Females Males

Male: 6% increase

Female: 3% increase

26

11/1/23

Note: Regular adult supervision excludes intensive programs, private probation, and DUI monitoring.

Alongside the trends highlighted above, probation has experienced growth in the number and proportion

of higher-risk adult probationers on supervision. Leadership and staff in probation districts report

individuals placed on probation are not only presenting with greater needs but also have more complex

and disrupted stability factors (e.g., homelessness), behavioral problems, acute mental illness, and longer

histories of failure on community supervision. These cases require greater strategic and time-intensive

supervision and so the strain placed upon state probation resources is growing, which exacerbates

workload pressures currently felt under existing staffing levels.

Probation continues to work to identify and use assessments, processes, and programs that uphold public

safety, are cost effective, and increase positive outcomes. There is a continued focus on the identification

and implementation of research-informed practices and principles. This effort is consistent with the

principles of evidence-based decision-making and supports the approach of working with individuals

based on their unique needs.

8,317

5,853

24,342

28,611

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23

Chart 9: New Adult Probationers by Age

FY14 to FY23

18-24* 25-50+

25-50+: 18% increase

18-24*: 30% decrease

*a small number of individuals under age 18 were included as they were charged with an

adult offense

54%

47%

27%

29%

18%

24%

FY14 FY23

Chart 10: Risk Level Comparison

FY14 To FY23

Low Risk Medium Risk High Risk

27

11/1/23

Probation success rates have steadily hovered between 66% and 69% over the last 5 years, lower than

72% a decade prior. As adults and juveniles with higher risks and needs enter the criminal justice system,

lower success rates can be expected. In FY23, the overall success rate for probation programs was 66%.

A combination of absconders and technical violations account for most failures on supervision.

Note: This chart combines adult and juvenile, regular, and intensive programs, monitoring, state, and

private probation numbers.

Probation Management Strategies

To improve outcomes, Probation continues to pursue adequate staffing, implementation of applicable

research-informed programs and practices, and training and skill development for staff. Probation’s

current efforts to improve outcomes include the following.

Probation collaborates with stakeholders to research, implement, train, and provide technical assistance

for brain injury screening efforts for justice-involved adults and juveniles across the state. This year,

Probation Services hosted two additional training events in honor of Brain Injury Awareness Month

(March) and expanded brain injury screening to include a total of six Judicial Districts.

New Electronic monitoring (EM) vendors and contracts are pending, following a solicitation which made

several adjustments to the scope of work. During the solicitation, a significant effort was made to better

educate probation staff and judicial officers—as well as criminal justice stakeholders—on the benefits,

realities, and limitations of EM. Additionally, a new Chief Justice Directive (CJD) will soon be implemented

to increase consistency across jurisdictions regarding the utilization of EM. The CJD will outline the

purposes and limitations of EM in probation, as well as address numerous procedural requirements.

Probation staff experience a significant amount of occupational stress and secondary trauma due to their

work. The COVID-19 public health emergency magnified the stress for these officers, as they had to find

creative ways to continue providing services while adhering to public health guidelines and local

72%

70%

67%

65%

66%

68%

69%

68%

66%

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23

Chat 11: 10 Year Probation Programs Success Rates

FY14 to FY23

28

11/1/23

directives. In addition, the fentanyl epidemic has disproportionately affected individuals on probation,

which has added another layer of distress for probation staff. In response, the Division of Probation

Services (DPS) has been focusing resources on addressing staff health and wellbeing. In the past year,

quarterly learning opportunities have been offered to Judicial employees with a focus on wellbeing. In

addition, DPS has made the Corrections Fatigue to Fulfillment curriculum a part of the regular training

catalog and are developing local peer supports to connect with probation staff who engage in the

curriculum. This is in addition to local efforts to address this issue. It is hoped that providing these

resources will reduce turnover and improve the overall well-being of current employees, so they are

better equipped to perform their job duties.

Probationer typologies (a reflection of common characteristics of a group of probationers based on an

analysis of Probation’s adult population) have been implemented for the adult probation population and

most probation staff have been trained on the typologies. Intensive supervision programs were developed

to target higher risk probationers, with special attention to reducing their specific criminogenic needs.

Performance feedback efforts continue, including the development of dashboards and quarterly statistical

reports summarizing each judicial district’s current population and termination numbers. These reports

provide probation departments with the opportunity to adapt more quickly to changing justice-involved

populations and manage resources accordingly.

The Special Projects Program (formerly known as the Rural Initiative Program) continues to facilitate the

training and state approval of domestic violence, sex offender and substance abuse treatment providers

in underserved regions. This effort is intended to provide quality treatment “close to home” for

probationers who would otherwise be required to travel significant distances to secure treatment. More

recently, navigator services have been introduced to assist probationers with successful completion of

supervision and the requirements of their sentence. These initiatives are supported by supervision fees

paid by offenders.

In August 2021, the Judicial Department finalized an information-sharing agreement with the Department

of Health Care Policy & Financing (HCPF). The purpose of the agreement was to improve collaborative

relationships at a state and local level with a specific focus on improving access to care and care

coordination, reducing recidivism, identifying cost and time saving opportunities, developing evaluations,

and using data and information to make decisions. In addition to the information-sharing agreement,

improved process and data collection efforts are underway. Probation Officers identify individuals who

are actively enrolled in Medicaid and this information is reported to HCPF and passed along to the specific

HCPF contractors, such as the Regional Accountable Entities (RAEs), that function as the members’

respective healthcare plans. Additionally, the Judicial Department and HCPF established monthly

collaborative meetings. These monthly meetings are with Judicial Division of Probation Services (DPS)

representatives, HCPF representatives, and Criminal Justice Care Coordinator representatives from each

of the RAE regions. The Judicial Department is actively working alongside HCPF and the RAEs to create

additional collaboration opportunities at the state and local levels. Local Probation Districts and RAE

regions have scheduled meetings to further support awareness of care coordination resources, Medicaid

funding, and the complexities for dually involved people in probation and the behavioral health system.

29

11/1/23

In FY23, the Colorado Judicial Department made extensive efforts to exemplify its renewed mission, vision,

and values in its work. These efforts include working to improve processes, such as using mediation in

eviction cases, automatically sealing qualified criminal records, standardizing virtual proceedings, making

the Department’s website more accessible, and making probation more responsive to probationer and

victim needs. Efforts also included steps to improve the structural supports of the Department, such the

work to update its mission, vision, and values, implement the 23

rd

judicial district, expand the senior judge

program, incorporate DEI into problem-solving courts, and provide education to staff.

These efforts are paying off. The court user survey reports over 70% of court users surveyed have a

positive view of their interaction with the courts. The jury trial backlog has stabilized, and continuances

and failures to appear in criminal courts are decreasing. Probation continues to secure high success rates

for probationers despite the proportion of high-risk probationers increasing. Overall, the Colorado Judicial

Department continues to perform its mission at a high level by providing equal access to justice,

contributing to public safety, and strengthening the rule of law.

Summary

Colorado Judicial Branch

District Court Judge Statistics

Senate Bill 19-043

New Cases and Terminated Cases Date Range: Between Jul 1, 2022 and Jun 30, 2023

Open Cases: Dec 8, 2023

Report Caveats

1. This report reflects data pulled on Dec 8, 2023

2. The judicial officer data reflects all judicial officers that have handled a district court case in the reporting timeframe. Please note, not all judicial officers listed are routinely assigned to district court.

3. All district judicial officers that have handled district court cases are included in this report. (e.g. senior judges, county judges, etc.)

4. This number does not and is not intended to reflect a judges entire workload.

Table of Contents

New Cases by District

3

Terminated Cases by District

5

Open Cases by District

7

New Cases by Judge

9

Terminated Cases by Judge

40

Open Cases by Judge

72

New Cases by District

New Cases Between Jul 1, 2022 and Jun 30, 2023

3

New Cases by District

District CR -

Criminal

CV -Civil

-District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

1 2,737 1,507 260 113 28 1 54 6 1,642 6,348

2 4,975 4,391 3,830 1,365 756 15,317

3 316 127 150 7 20 118 29 125 892

4 5,463 2,791 3,125 36 68 134 1 139 11,757

5 745 484 501 40 63 14 100 73 273 2,293

6 505 211 52 151 2 58 13 79 231 1,302

7 754 406 115 318 64 104 35 81 67 144 2,088

8 2,304 906 525 118 41 35 5 520 316 4,770

9 540 364 160 443 20 41 2 40 42 255 1,907

10 1,882 316 61 134 4 13 162 403 653 3,628

11 659 329 205 14 31 2 55 62 381 1,738

12 648 179 47 320 54 69 128 161 361 1,967

13 905 307 454 68 76 6 125 87 375 2,403

14 441 226 7 261 13 39 3 25 36 185 1,236

15 208 73 114 9 40 57 6 146 653

16 408 135 5 26 37 67 22 45 745

17 3,769 2,206 2,982 56 167 2 117 62 74 9,435

18 3,445 3,808 1,684 179 80 27 220 313 443 10,199

19 2,080 1,015 10 360 47 9 4 359 276 1,091 5,251

20 2,135 1,037 1,075 21 241 5 41 512 924 5,991

21 1,582 561 981 97 4 13 10 281 673 4,202

22 244 23 30 10 97 4 7 124 539

25 215 227 7 290 739

Total 36,745 21,402 452 17,908 1,213 1,553 156 2,205 4,410 9,356 95,400

4

Terminated Cases by District

Terminated Cases Between Jul 1, 2022 and Jun 30, 2023

5

Terminated Cases by District

District CR -

Criminal

CV -Civil

-District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

1 3,144 1,500 113 113 40 2 67 6 1,629 6,614

2 5,249 4,532 3,742 1,384 792 15,699

3 377 128 151 8 31 94 23 117 929

4 6,392 2,808 3,604 28 63 2 141 2 125 13,165

5 818 477 468 37 67 15 93 71 262 2,308

6 514 232 56 117 3 40 9 92 223 1,286

7 864 384 123 292 72 102 37 78 70 136 2,158

8 2,303 878 328 100 28 33 3 512 306 4,491

9 545 309 151 413 20 67 1 34 42 230 1,812

10 1,931 277 107 117 2 7 119 471 686 3,717

11 786 352 224 16 32 1 69 59 388 1,927

12 632 203 83 363 47 51 1 146 158 295 1,979

13 937 309 453 59 84 5 106 95 391 2,439

14 523 236 45 255 12 43 3 27 34 189 1,367

15 191 72 131 7 58 74 6 143 682

16 416 126 5 28 32 1 49 19 44 720

17 3,822 2,220 2,879 56 191 2 130 65 77 9,442

18 3,931 3,814 1,484 168 83 31 212 319 475 10,517

19 2,088 1,034 42 449 50 5 8 335 277 1,067 5,355

20 2,182 951 1,099 32 201 5 29 510 874 5,883

21 1,884 573 980 86 16 13 7 279 644 4,482

22 345 16 16 12 85 6 7 137 624

25 202 249 7 313 771

Total 39,874 21,431 607 17,683 1,158 1,575 167 2,141 4,501 9,230 98,367

6

Open Cases by District

Open Cases: Dec 8, 2023

7

Open Cases by District

District CR -

Criminal

CV -Civil

-District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

1 3,431 740 371 5 15 106 86 4,754

2 6,293 2,149 1,540 93 169 10,244

3 421 78 108 9 17 131 8 36 808

4 7,293 1,481 714 26 100 210 57 9,881

5 1,529 288 350 12 72 4 58 9 68 2,390

6 741 106 78 105 39 24 7 37 1,137

7 1,138 220 92 249 10 52 3 74 7 64 1,909

8 3,119 543 714 33 19 1 7 17 99 4,552

9 1,029 394 271 383 11 11 28 10 91 2,228

10 1,739 246 27 111 4 8 159 82 226 2,602

11 806 213 147 3 27 1 56 11 66 1,330

12 884 82 110 179 4 65 1 107 5 146 1,583

13 1,501 135 232 11 70 2 114 12 94 2,171

14 620 151 75 212 5 23 5 16 5 24 1,136

15 280 32 77 4 38 1 50 23 505

16 512 74 5 29 49 5 45 719

17 6,945 1,127 1,872 12 229 197 2 113 10,497

18 5,609 2,102 1,080 36 181 6 378 2 117 9,511

19 4,033 507 42 242 6 11 1 183 3 233 5,261

20 2,633 717 529 2 187 4 22 11 229 4,334

21 2,011 270 758 16 4 8 5 31 230 3,333

22 418 16 31 17 3 1 22 508

25 40 223 3 484 750

Total 52,985 11,671 695 10,009 249 1,437 40 2,461 321 2,275 82,143

8

New Cases by Judge

New Cases Between Jul 1, 2022 and Jun 30, 2023

9

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

1 ARP, RANDALL C 204 152 21 377

BURBACK,

BRADLEY ALLEN

64 2 66

CARPENTER,

VERNA L

45 45

CARRITHERS,

JASON D

214 142 13 369

GOMAN, KEITH 50 50

HODGES, PAUL

VINCENT

1 1

HUNT, DIEGO G 221 139 25 385

KLEIN, RUSSELL

BRENT

234 145 28 407

LOCHARY,

ROBERT C

1 1

MAGID,

CORINNE

MICHELE

80 80

MCNULTY,

PHILIP JAMES

201 138 29 368

MEINSTER, ANN

GAIL

2 113 28 1 54 198

MELTON,

JENNIFER LYNN

68 68

OEFFLER, LILY

WALLMAN

1 1

PEPER,

GRAHAM B

62 62

PILKINGTON, 214 35 5 254

10

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

1 JEFFREY RALPH

RANDALL, MARK

MARROW

82 82

RHAMEY,

CHRISTOPHER

BLAKE

195 147 58 400

RUSSELL,

TAMARA S

196 141 31 368

TIGHE, LAURA

ANN

1 1

TUTTLE,

DINSMORE

1 1

VALLEJOS,

MICHAEL JAMES

1 1

VANGILDER,

LINDSAY L

210 145 27 382

VRIESMAN,

TODD L

127 184 5 1,641 1,957

WALTER,

REGINA MARIE

1 1

WHEELER,

KRISTAN K

47 47

ZENISEK,

CHRISTOPHER

CLAYTON

219 137 20 376

2 ANTOUN,

CHRISTINE

CATHERINE

280 7 528 815

ARNOLDS, LISA

CHRISTINE

357 3 360

11

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

2 BAILEY, MARK T 329 329

BAUMANN,

CHRISTOPHER

JAY

1 780 781

BLAND, NIKEA

TANISHA

437 6 1 444

BOYETTE,

PALMER L

30 30

BRODY, KAREN

L

411 7 206 624

BRONFIN,

EDWARD DAVID

32 2 34

DORANCY, JILL

DEBORAH

346 346

EGELHOFF,

MARTIN FOSTER

32 252 284

ELLIFF, J ERIC 349 349

ENGLERT,

ERICKA F.

HOUCK

471 8 479

ESPINOSA,

ADAM JOSEPH

577 3 580

GERDES,

KANDACE

CECILIA

41 261 302

GILMAN,

SHELLEY ILENE

1 273 274

GOLDBERG,

DAVID H

350 350

GRANT, JAY 457 3 460

12

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

2 SUTHERLAND

JOHNSON, ERIC

MARTIN

447 5 452

JONES, A

BRUCE

387 100 487

LEITH,

ELIZABETH

DEMBERG

68 1,365 756 2,189

LUXEN,

ANDREW J

287 287

MCCALLIN,

ANDREW

PATRICK

34 760 794

MOSES, MARIE

AVERY

95 571 666

MYERS, ALEX C 431 62 493

OLAFSON, JON

JAY

78 78

SCHUTTE, ANITA

MARIE

6 751 757

SCOVILLE,

STEPHANIE

LINDQUIST

355 355

SHOCKLEY,

DARRYL F

439 5 444

TORRINGTON,

JENNIFER

BOURN

144 4 245 393

TRUJILLO,

DEMETRIA

10 768 778

13

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

2 ELIZABETH

WALLACE,

SARAH BLOCK

302 302

WHITNEY, BRIAN

R

1 1

3 EPSTEIN, SCOTT

BRADFORD

3 3

EYLER,

DEBORAH RENE

2 2

FOWLER,

PIERCE LOGAN

120 60 67 2 6 22 11 42 330

GERBRACHT,

LESLIE JEAN

27 3 3 4 4 10 42 93

GONZALES,

MARTIN A

1 1

GROHS,

DEBORAH J

1 1

KARN,

KIMBERLY JO

2 1 3

KOLOMITZ, M

JON

1 1 2

MANN, DAWN

MARIE

20 1 54 72 20 167

MARTINEZ,

GILBERT

ANTHONY

1 1 2

MCKISSON, J.

CLAY

130 61 25 2 9 20 8 21 276

MOCHEL, JOHN

DAVID

11 11

14

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

3 SWIFT, PATTIE

PRATT

1 1

4 ABSMEIER,

CARL J

1 1

ANKENY,

CHARLOTTE

ADAMS

22 22

BAIN, WILLIAM B 209 98 2 309

BENTLEY, ERIC 5 377 1 383

BILLINGS VELA,

LINDA

MARGARET

309 15 47 21 392

BRADY, JILL M 300 257 557

BURNEY,

SAMORREYAN

VALECIA

32 32

CHITTUM, ROBIN

LYNN

276 2 6 61 345

CURTIS,

JESSICA LYN

287 1 248 2 538

EPSTEIN, SCOTT

BRADFORD

1 1

EVIG, SAMUEL

ALBERT

268 1 259 528

FENNICK,

YOLANDA

MIRIAM

18 18

FINDORFF,

LAURA NORRIS

272 217 489

GERHART, 28 6 34

15

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

4 SHANNON

MARIE

GILBERT, DAVID

A

273 188 461

GOMEZ, MONICA

JO

319 2 245 566

GRANGER,

RUSSELL

HOLTON

2 1 3

GROHS,

DEBORAH J

6 6

HENSON,

MARCUS SHANE

297 249 546

JOHNSON,

FRANCES

RENAE

339 269 608

KANE, THOMAS

KELLY

1 919 1 921

KARN,

KIMBERLY JO

12 12

KATZMAN,

STEVEN

37 37

KILGORE,

THERESA LYNN

41 41

LYMAN,

GREGORY G

1 1

MAY, DIANA K 312 5 19 34 370

MCGUIRE,

DENNIS L

48 48

MCHENRY, 318 189 507

16

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

4 MICHAEL P

MCKEDY,

CYNTHIA ANN

36 36

MILLER, CHAD

CLAYTON

302 1 241 544

MITCHELL

HELTON,

CATHERINE

DIANE

273 2 234 509

PATRICK,

MEREDITH ANN

30 1 31

PEACOCK,

DULCE DENISE

24 24

PLOTZ,

KENNETH M

1 1

PRINCE, DAVID

SCOTT

191 270 461

PRUDEK, MARLA

R

1 184 232 417

ROTOLO, ANN

MARIA

27 27

SELLS, SCOTT A 197 112 109 11 15 18 111 573

SHAKES, DAVID

LEE

272 186 2 460

SOKOL, ERIN

LYNN

269 264 533

SPEAR,

MICHAEL JAMES

1 1

TIDBALL, JANE A 1 1

17

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

4 TRUJILLO,

DEMETRIA

ELIZABETH

2 2

WERNER,

GREGORY

ROBERT

2 331 28 361

5 CASIAS,

EDWARD JUDE

114 114

CAUSEY, INGA

HAAGENSON

145 2 147

CHEROUTES,

CATHERINE

JANE

59 71 112 31 15 10 28 17 64 407

DUNKELMAN,

PAUL RISLEY

7 172 6 7 1 39 232

GRANGER,

RUSSELL

HOLTON

16 1 1 18

HOWARD,

STEPHEN

ENDERLIN

1 1

JONES, CYNTHIA

JOLENE

104 23 127

MULLINS,

RONALD M

1 1

OLGUIN-

FRESQUEZ,

RACHEL J

98 17 118 23 1 33 290

OWENS, REED

W

42 138 90 6 9 23 17 33 358

ROMEO, KAREN 54 53 63 16 8 5 54 253

18

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

5 ANN

SCOTT, JOHN

GREGORY

37 37

SHAMIS,

JONATHAN

KEITH

84 17 111 3 2 10 81 308

6 BACA, ANTHONY

NATHANIEL

176 58 31 26 4 71 72 438

CARLSON,

SUZANNE

FAIRCHILD

171 51 31 76 329

CISNEROS,

THERESA M

1 1

FAY, JUSTIN

PATRICK

73 69 9 32 6 77 266

STEWART, REID 54 54

WILSON,

JEFFREY

RAYMOND

31 32 52 80 2 3 8 6 214

7 BECKENHAUER,

KURT MICHAEL

14 14

BURGEMEISTER,

ASHLEY

MORGAN

25 25

DEGANHART,

MARY E

94 107 2 1 1 1 38 67 311

GROHS,

DEBORAH J

1 1 2

HARVELL,

LAURA EH

136 136

19

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

7 HOWARD,

STEPHEN

ENDERLIN

1 1

JACKSON, D.

CORY

8 100 182 37 29 35 1 4 396

MCDONALD,

JAMES R

1 1

MURPHY, SEAN

KENDALL

36 36

PATRICK, JAMES

STEVEN

76 138 3 83 5 27 15 3 11 361

PLOTZ,

KENNETH M

2 2

SCHULTZ,

STEVEN L

109 1 18 33 3 25 24 53 266

SPEAR,

MICHAEL JAMES

2 2

STANWAY,

STEPHEN

GREGG

112 112

THOMASSON,

LANE P

9 9

WALKER,

DOUGLAS S

3 1 4

YODER, KERI

ANN

134 53 49 3 44 2 5 1 8 299

ZEERIP, BO A 111 111

8 BERENATO,

MARY JOAN

1 1

BLANCO, SUSAN 162 3 1 1 1 168

20

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

8 JASMINE

BRINEGAR,

CARROLL

MICHELLE

19 258 1 278

CHRISTIANSEN,

DINA M

1 515 516

CURE, SARAH

BETH

376 59 147 582

DEAN, LAURIE

KAZUE

225 59 35 1 320

ECTON, KRAIG 4 4

ELLISON,

KATHARINE J

32 32

FINDLEY,

JOSEPH DEAN

139 2 518 659

JOUARD,

STEPHEN JOHN

414 141 8 2 2 567

LAMMONS,

GREGORY M

403 5 2 166 576

LEHMAN,

JOSHUA BLAKE

41 41

LYNCH, THOMAS

L

27 27

MCDONALD,

DANIEL

MICHAEL

419 38 1 458

MUNCH,

CHRISTOPHER J

1 1

RYAN, CHELSEA

WILLIAMS

2 2

21

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

8 TUTTLE,

DINSMORE

1 1

VILLASENOR,

JUAN GONZALO

403 134 537

9 ANDREWS,

ASHLEY RENEE

9 9

JORDAN,

CLAUDIA JEAN

1 1

LYNCH, DENISE

K

126 82 104 4 2 11 53 382

METZGER, PAUL 2 3 5

MUNCH,

CHRISTOPHER J

1 1

MYER, ELISE

VICTORIA

5 14 54 7 9 1 18 108

NEILEY, JOHN

FOWLER

122 86 97 5 1 7 12 51 381

NORRDIN, ANNE

KIRKPATRICK

120 91 110 4 5 1 8 9 70 418

POTOTSKY,

JONATHAN

BRUCE

53 23 76

ROFF, ANGELA

M

45 45

SELDIN,

CHRISTOPHER

GILES

57 68 2 77 7 4 2 9 63 289

SHAMIS,

JONATHAN

KEITH

1 22 11 34

22

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

9 STRABLIZKY,

HOLLY KIRSNER

158 158

10 ALEXANDER,

WILLIAM DAVID

323 2 6 162 493

ERNST, ALLISON

PATRICIA

492 4 1 2 499

EYLER,

DEBORAH RENE

2 2 1 5

FIELDMAN,

STEVEN B

70 70

FLESHER,

THOMAS

BRADFORD

411 2 6 419

GRANGER,

RUSSELL

HOLTON

1 1

GROHS,

DEBORAH J

1 1

KOLOMITZ, M

JON

3 3

MARKENSON,

AMIEL JOSHUA

524 4 528

MARTINEZ,

GILBERT

ANTHONY

1 1

O'SHEA,

TIMOTHY

MICHAEL

80 402 651 1,133

SLETTA,

STEPHEN

JAMES

15 15

23

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

10 STYDUHAR,

GREGORY

JOSEPH

134 61 22 2 219

THOMAS,

TAYLER MARIE

75 111 186

VELLAR,

MARGARET C

55 55

11 BULL, DIANA

CARENE

5 1 6

CAUSEY, INGA

HAAGENSON

1 1

FLESHER,

THOMAS

BRADFORD

1 1

GREEN, BRIAN

LOUIS

14 14

GROOME,

STEPHEN A

2 17 19

Halpin, Michael 1 1

HUNTER,

AMANDA

91 106 80 5 9 14 11 114 430

KARN,

KIMBERLY JO

1 1

MURPHY,

PATRICK W

144 26 45 4 20 31 41 45 356

ROBAK,

ALEXANDRA

OLSEN

47 47

TURNER,

KAITLIN

321 20 7 6 17 371

24

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

11 BRIANNE

WENNER,

LYNETTE MARY

34 176 79 5 2 3 4 188 491

12 ACHESON, RUTH

M

2 2

CISNEROS,

THERESA M

1 1

CORTEZ,

KIMBERLY

DAWN

233 46 30 309

EPSTEIN, SCOTT

BRADFORD

2 2

EYLER,

DEBORAH RENE

1 1 2

GERBRACHT,

LESLIE JEAN

2 1 3

GONZALES,

MICHAEL A

157 4 4 1 1 19 1 187

HOPKINS,

AMANDA CLAIRE

37 4 1 3 33 12 101 42 233

KELLY, JASON T 43 43

NEWMYER-

OLSEN, CRISTA

LEE

123 2 20 8 27 118 359 657

SARMIENTO,

NICOLAS

42 42

SCHNEIDER,

BRITTANY

1 1

SCHUENEMANN,

CRAIG KARL

18 18

25

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

12 STENGER, JOHN 56 1 57

SULLIVAN,

TAMARA

MCSHERRY

20 270 290

WALZL, DANIEL

AUSTIN

67 67

WOOD,

KIMBERLY LYNN

9 1 42 1 53

13 BRAMMER, RAY

ANN

27 27

BRANDENBURG,

DENNIS LEE

33 33

GAGLIANO,

STEPHANIE M G

167 76 61 13 10 2 8 55 392

GRINNAN,

MICHAEL KELLY

9 9

HAENLEIN,

JUSTIN

BRADLEY

186 61 132 20 20 36 27 143 625

HANSEN, KELLY

S

5 5

HOBBS,

CHARLES M

156 74 97 9 18 2 39 20 60 475

JAMES, ROBERT

CHARLES

157 84 102 7 18 35 18 63 484

JONES, KRISTEI

R

6 6

KILLIN, KIMBRA

L

2 2

LANDRY, MYKA 5 5

26

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

13 MARIE

MCGUIRE, CARL

SIDNEY

152 12 62 19 10 2 7 22 54 340

14 CATANZARITE,

NICHOLAS

70 70

GARDNER,

SANDRA H

98 45 94 9 22 9 4 281

HERRINGER,

WILLIAM

LAURENCE

1 1

HOAK, MARY

CLARKSON

42 102 162 1 7 2 6 11 185 518

LABUDA, JUDITH

L

1 1

O'HARA,

MICHAEL

ANDREW

58 78 7 5 3 10 1 10 21 193

SCHNEIDER,

BRITTANY

91 91

WILSON, ERIN

MICHELE

81 81

15 BRINKLEY,

STANLEY A

1 1

DAVIDSON,

MICHAEL JOHN

99 34 67 5 20 37 2 74 338

DAVIS, GARY W 1 1

EIRING, DENI

ESTELLE

1 1

EPSTEIN, SCOTT

BRADFORD

1 1

27

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

15 EYLER,

DEBORAH RENE

1 1

JOHNSON,

TARRYN L

89 37 46 4 18 20 4 71 289

PORTER,

CURTIS LANE

17 1 18

VIGIL, SAMUEL

SCOTT

1 2 3

16 BOYCE, JEREMY

P

1 1

BRINKLEY,

STANLEY A

1 1

CLARK, LANCE

PALMER

3 3

DAVIDSON,

MICHAEL JOHN

1 1

EIRING, DENI

ESTELLE

18 18

JOHNSON,

TARRYN L

1 1

KARN,

KIMBERLY JO

2 2

MACDONNELL,

MARK ANDREW

217 11 3 12 22 14 9 43 331

MANLEY,

DOUGLAS R

17 17

VIGIL, SAMUEL

SCOTT

167 104 2 14 15 53 13 2 370

17 ABSMEIER,

CARL J

2 2

28

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

17 DATZ, CARYN A 12 71 57 140

DEWICK,

AMANDA WILEY

415 415

DINNEL,

COURTNEY LEE

123 123

FINN, SEAN

PATRICK

312 307 61 680

FLAUM, MARTIN

JEFFREY

13 13

GROOME,

STEPHEN A

5 5

HOLBROOK,

SHARON D

478 2 2 482

HOWARD,

STEPHEN

ENDERLIN

1 1

IVEY, MARQUES

ALEXANDER

98 98

JIMENEZ, LARA

M

100 100

KIRBY, LEROY D 71 71

LIEBERMAN,

EMILY C

3 33 53 1 53 143

LOEW,

PRISCILLA J

239 11 38 6 63 357

LOWENBACH,

JOHN ROBERT

1 1 2

MARTIN, BRETT

M

415 9 4 428

29

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

17 MCINTYRE,

RAYNA GOKLI

1,075 1,075

NOWAK,

JOSHUA

THOMAS

120 120

PUGH, PATRICK

HAROLD

398 2 400

QUICK, DONALD

SPENCE

23 3 1 9 36

RAMIREZ,

ROBERTO

739 739

SEEDORF, KYLE 394 3 397

SMITH, JEFFREY

ALLEN

445 2 447

SOUTHERLAND,

KELLEY

REBECCA

1,067 1,067

STOUT, SARAH

ELIZABETH

740 740

TUTTLE,

DINSMORE

1 1

VASQUEZ, TERI

LYNN

378 526 904

VIELMA,

MARYANN

138 138

WARNER, MARK

DOUGLAS

309 2 311

18 AMICO,

MICHELLE ANN

4 12 9 25

BAKER, 298 4 302

30

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

18 LAQUNYA

LATRESE

BAUM, ANDREW 532 532

BOWLING,

LAWRENCE

RAYMOND

140 140

BOYETTE,

PALMER L

32 32

CISNEROS,

THERESA M

1 1 2

CONTIGUGLIA,

CHANTEL E

23 23

CROSS,

CHRISTOPHER

CHARLES

1 1

EDSON, JACOB

ALAN

342 2 344

FIELDS, KOLONY

LOREN

4 4

FIGA, BENJAMIN

TODD

4 562 3 569

GROHS,

DEBORAH J

1 1 2

GROOME,

STEPHEN A

1 1

HENDERSON,

THOMAS

WILLARD

484 484

HERNANDEZ,

MELINA

1 1

31

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

18 HOLMES,

JEFFREY K

1 1

HURST, HAROLD

CLAYBURN

55 42 25 5 7 1 24 294 388 841

KLINGENSMITH,

VICTORIA ELLEN

140 127 267

KRAMER, GARY

MICHAEL

515 2 2 4 523

LAFAVE, KELLY

ANN

22 22

LEUTWYLER,

BEN L

649 649

LINDSEY,

CAJARDO R

1 420 421

LOWENBACH,

JOHN ROBERT

2 2

LUNG, ROBERT

RAYMOND

556 1 557

MARTINEZ, ALEX

JOSEPH

1 1

MARTINEZ,

FREDERICK

THOMAS

1 1

MARTINEZ,

GILBERT

ANTHONY

1 1

MCLEAN,

BONNIE

HEATHER

59 26 2 21 55 19 56 238

MEYER, WILLIAM 2 2

32

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

18 GUTHRIE

MUNCH,

CHRISTOPHER J

1 1

POST, CHERYL L 1 1

PRATT,

CHARLES M

1 1

RINI, CHERYL

MIEKO

1 1

ROCHE,

MICHAEL J

25 25

ROMEO,

JEFFREY L

1 1

ROWLES-

STOKES,

CHERYL ANN

23 23

SLADE,

THERESA

MICHELLE

31 102 112 13 12 3 10 19 40 342

STRICKLIN,

NATALIE

GIRARD

464 2 466

STUART, RYAN

JAMES

468 5 6 479

TOUART,

DANIELLE

22 22

TOUSSAINT,

DON JESSE

651 1 652

VAHLE, DARREN

LOUIS

353 45 398

VOLZ, 9 709 1 719

33

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

18 ELIZABETH

BEEBE

WAIDLER, KELLY

ERIN

132 132

WHITAKER,

SHAY KARA

314 4 318

WHITE, ERIC

BARCLAY

287 5 292

WHITFIELD,

JOSEPH RILEY

312 5 317

WILLIFORD,

JOSHUA JAY

21 21

19 BRIGGS, JOHN

JOSEPH

29 29

DOAK, RENEE

SANDOVAL

42 42

ESSER, ALLISON

JILL

381 1 4 386

HARTMANN,

JAMES FRANCIS

2 2

HAUSE,

WARREN TROY

270 47 4 70 391

HOSKINS, JULIE

CHRISTINE

5 7 52 1 9 276 1,088 1,438

HOWARD,

STEPHEN

ENDERLIN

1 1

KERNS,

TIMOTHY

GERARD

394 3 397

34

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

19 KOPCOW,

MARCELO

ADRIAN

385 3 3 391

LYONS,

SHANNON

DOUGLAS

396 2 1 399

MEYER,

MICHELE LYNN

27 27

MUEHLENKAMP,

JAYME L

38 280 318

NICHOLS, DANA 32 32

SALEEBEY,

MEGHAN

PATRICE

410 5 415

SIERRA, NORMA

ANGELICA

2 1 3

TAYLOR, TODD L 596 8 604

VIGIL, VINCENTE

GERALDO

374 2 376

20 ANDERSON,

EMILY

ELIZABETH

1 1

ARCHULETA,

DAVID ANTHONY

166 1 167

BAKKE, INGRID

SEFTAR

235 1 240 5 35 516

BRODSKY,

ELIZABETH

HOUSE

MOULTON

148 1 149

35

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

20 BUTLER,

PATRICK D

594 594

COLLINS, J

KEITH

346 1 168 307 822

GROOME,

STEPHEN A

1 1

GUNNING,

ROBERT

351 133 304 788

HAENSELMAN,

MONICA O

155 1 1 19 176

HARTMAN,

ANDREW

316 2 1 319

HARTMANN,

JAMES FRANCIS

1 1

LANGER, BRUCE 1 394 1 1 397

LINDSEY, DEA M 325 1 1 169 312 808

MALKINSON,

ZACHARY ILYA

156 1 157

MARTIN,

JONATHON P

12 1 13

MULLINS,

RONALD M

1 1

MULVAHILL,

THOMAS

FRANCIS

2 358 2 362

MUNCH,

CHRISTOPHER J

7 7

PLOTZ,

KENNETH M

3 3

36

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

20 SALOMONE,

NANCY

WOODRUFF

653 1 654

SATTER,

RAYMOND

NATHAN

1 1

SCHAPANSKI,

STEPHEN JON

1 1

SIERRA, NORMA

ANGELICA

1 40 41

TUTTLE,

DINSMORE

2 3 5

VALLEJOS,

MICHAEL JAMES

1 2 3

VOLZ,

ELIZABETH

BEEBE

2 2

ZENISEK,

CHRISTOPHER

CLAYTON

2 2

21 BARRETT,

MATTHEW

DAVID

266 79 198 9 1 553

CHAFFIN,

JEREMY L

1 4 2 70 4 10 281 670 1,042

FLYNN, BRIAN

JAMES

296 253 189 2 4 3 747

GRANGER,

RUSSELL

HOLTON

1 1

GRATTAN, 50 50

37

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

21 MICHAEL

JOSEPH

GROHS,

DEBORAH J

1 1

GURLEY,

RICHARD

THOMAS

274 72 194 3 1 544

HENDERSON,

CRAIG PETER

59 59

LARSON,

GRETCHEN

BUCK

290 78 199 5 2 2 576

RAAUM, BRUCE

ROSS

55 55

ROBISON,

VALERIE JO

289 73 196 8 3 569

SWIFT, PATTIE

PRATT

1 1

TUTTLE,

DINSMORE

1 1

WALKER,

DOUGLAS S

1 1 1 3

22 BACA, ANTHONY

NATHANIEL

2 2

LAWRENCE,

JENNILYNN

EVERETT

81 81

MARGESON,

MATTHEW

GREGORY

6 6

38

New Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

22 PLEWE, TODD

JAY

157 20 30 8 96 2 6 92 411

TARRIN,

KRISTEN

MCLAUGHLIN

1 1

WALKER,

DOUGLAS S

1 2 1 1 1 32 38

25 CLARK, LAURIE

A

71 79 76 226

MOULTRIE, PAX

LEIA

67 46 85 198

WOODS, DAVID

BRETT

77 102 7 129 315

Total 36,745 21,402 452 17,908 1,213 1,553 156 2,205 4,410 9,356 95,400

39

Terminated Cases by Judge

Terminated Cases Between Jul 1, 2022 and Jun 30, 2023

40

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

1 ARP, RANDALL C 255 157 16 428

BURBACK,

BRADLEY ALLEN

55 2 57

CARPENTER,

VERNA L

52 52

CARRITHERS,

JASON D

251 149 7 407

GOMAN, KEITH 54 54

HODGES, PAUL

VINCENT

1 1

HOWARD,

STEPHEN

ENDERLIN

1 1

HUNT, DIEGO G 236 142 378

KLEIN, RUSSELL

BRENT

255 144 9 408

LOCHARY,

ROBERT C

1 1

MAGID,

CORINNE

MICHELE

87 87

MCNULTY,

PHILIP JAMES

253 123 13 389

MEINSTER, ANN

GAIL

1 2 113 40 2 67 225

MELTON,

JENNIFER LYNN

86 86

MUNCH,

CHRISTOPHER J

1 1

41

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

1 PEPER,

GRAHAM B

69 69

PILKINGTON,

JEFFREY RALPH

247 33 9 289

RANDALL, MARK

MARROW

70 70

RHAMEY,

CHRISTOPHER

BLAKE

240 149 45 434

RODGERS,

FREDERIC

BARKER

1 1

RUSSELL,

TAMARA S

242 143 6 391

TIGHE, LAURA

ANN

2 2

TUTTLE,

DINSMORE

1 1

VALLEJOS,

MICHAEL JAMES

1 1

VANGILDER,

LINDSAY L

248 157 2 407

VRIESMAN,

TODD L

142 163 3 5 1,628 1,941

WHEELER,

KRISTAN K

66 66

ZENISEK,

CHRISTOPHER

CLAYTON

229 137 1 367

2 ANTOUN, 194 5 691 890

42

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

2 CHRISTINE

CATHERINE

ARNOLDS, LISA

CHRISTINE

326 3 329

BAILEY, MARK T 295 295

BAUMANN,

CHRISTOPHER

JAY

1 798 799

BLAND, NIKEA

TANISHA

436 7 1 444

BOYETTE,

PALMER L

78 78

BRODY, KAREN

L

316 7 409 732

BRONFIN,

EDWARD DAVID

127 5 132

DORANCY, JILL

DEBORAH

395 3 398

EGELHOFF,

MARTIN FOSTER

132 156 288

ELLIFF, J ERIC 379 379

ENGLERT,

ERICKA F.

HOUCK

472 6 478

ESPINOSA,

ADAM JOSEPH

623 3 626

GERDES,

KANDACE

CECILIA

130 188 318

GILMAN, 1 343 344

43

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

2 SHELLEY ILENE

GOLDBERG,

DAVID H

362 362

GRANT, JAY

SUTHERLAND

458 3 461

JOHNSON, ERIC

MARTIN

509 2 511

JONES, A

BRUCE

321 211 532

LEITH,

ELIZABETH

DEMBERG

65 1,384 792 2,241

LUXEN,

ANDREW J

186 186

MCCALLIN,

ANDREW

PATRICK

97 746 843

MOSES, MARIE

AVERY

214 331 545

MYERS, ALEX C 369 184 553

OLAFSON, JON

JAY

5 5

SCHUTTE, ANITA

MARIE

5 772 777

SCOVILLE,

STEPHANIE

LINDQUIST

381 381

SHOCKLEY,

DARRYL F

470 2 472

TORRINGTON, 286 5 42 333

44

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

2 JENNIFER

BOURN

TRUJILLO,

DEMETRIA

ELIZABETH

7 744 751

VALLEJOS,

MICHAEL JAMES

3 3

WALLACE,

SARAH BLOCK

212 212

WHITNEY, BRIAN

R

1 1

3 EPSTEIN, SCOTT

BRADFORD

3 3

FOWLER,

PIERCE LOGAN

103 38 25 5 22 7 34 234

GERBRACHT,

LESLIE JEAN

73 1 27 6 5 4 11 43 170

GONZALES,

MARTIN A

1 1

GROHS,

DEBORAH J

1 1

KING, PAUL A 1 1

KOLOMITZ, M

JON

3 2 1 1 7

MANN, DAWN

MARIE

21 1 76 1 52 21 172

MARTINEZ,

GILBERT

ANTHONY

1 1

MCKISSON, J. 157 82 21 2 19 15 5 19 320

45

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

3 CLAY

MOCHEL, JOHN

DAVID

15 15

SCHWARTZ,

LARRY EDWARD

1 1

SWIFT, PATTIE

PRATT

1 2 3

4 ABSMEIER,

CARL J

1 1

ANKENY,

CHARLOTTE

ADAMS

24 24

BAIN, WILLIAM B 232 118 7 357

BENTLEY, ERIC 2 372 374

BILLINGS VELA,

LINDA

MARGARET

385 7 37 1 21 451

BRADY, JILL M 320 297 1 618

BURNEY,

SAMORREYAN

VALECIA

27 27

CHITTUM, ROBIN

LYNN

349 6 56 411

CURTIS,

JESSICA LYN

380 303 3 1 687

EPSTEIN, SCOTT

BRADFORD

2 2

EVIG, SAMUEL

ALBERT

347 1 280 628

46

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

4 FENNICK,

YOLANDA

MIRIAM

35 35

FINDORFF,

LAURA NORRIS

303 253 556

GERBRACHT,

LESLIE JEAN

1 1

GERHART,

SHANNON

MARIE

39 7 46

GILBERT, DAVID

A

294 174 468

GOMEZ, MONICA

JO

364 287 651

GRANGER,

RUSSELL

HOLTON

7 7

GROHS,

DEBORAH J

10 10

HENSON,

MARCUS SHANE

324 305 629

HERNANDEZ-

SULLIVAN,

EVELYN

1 1

JOHNSON,

FRANCES

RENAE

368 1 293 2 664

KANE, THOMAS

KELLY

2 902 904

KARN,

KIMBERLY JO

1 1

47

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

4 KATZMAN,

STEVEN

49 49

KILGORE,

THERESA LYNN

46 46

LYMAN,

GREGORY G

3 3

MAY, DIANA K 321 4 6 36 367

MCGUIRE,

DENNIS L

41 41

MCHENRY,

MICHAEL P

384 185 569

MCKEDY,

CYNTHIA ANN

36 36

MILLER, CHAD

CLAYTON

369 261 630

MILLER, G DAVID 1 1

MITCHELL

HELTON,

CATHERINE

DIANE

383 4 295 1 683

PARRISH, DAVID

DILLWYN

2 2

PATRICK,

MEREDITH ANN

39 1 1 41

PEACOCK,

DULCE DENISE

27 27

PLOTZ,

KENNETH M

3 3

PRINCE, DAVID

SCOTT

3 203 310 516

48

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

4 PRUDEK, MARLA

R

1 199 263 463

ROTOLO, ANN

MARIA

27 27

SELLS, SCOTT A 213 102 122 10 18 25 97 587

SHAKES, DAVID

LEE

294 184 2 480

SOKOL, ERIN

LYNN

337 310 647

SPEAR,

MICHAEL JAMES

2 1 3

TIDBALL, JANE A 1 1

WERNER,

GREGORY

ROBERT

4 358 28 390

5 CASIAS,

EDWARD JUDE

147 147

CAUSEY, INGA

HAAGENSON

82 1 83

CHEROUTES,

CATHERINE

JANE

52 62 100 27 9 9 24 16 65 364

DUNKELMAN,

PAUL RISLEY

22 154 21 3 6 1 40 247

GRANGER,

RUSSELL

HOLTON

56 1 2 59

HOWARD,

STEPHEN

ENDERLIN

1 1

49

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

5 JONES, CYNTHIA

JOLENE

113 23 136

MEISSNER-

CUTLER,

SUSANNA LEA

1 1

MULLINS,

RONALD M

1 1

MUNCH,

CHRISTOPHER J

1 1

OLGUIN-

FRESQUEZ,

RACHEL J

134 12 82 26 1 33 288

OWENS, REED

W

60 155 127 7 7 22 16 33 427

ROMEO, KAREN

ANN

103 24 60 22 8 5 55 277

RUCKRIEGLE,

WILLIAM TERRY

3 3

SCOTT, JOHN

GREGORY

15 15

SHAMIS,

JONATHAN

KEITH

85 13 77 3 4 8 68 258

6 BACA, ANTHONY

NATHANIEL

172 63 15 24 84 67 425

CARLSON,

SUZANNE

FAIRCHILD

163 49 14 71 297

EDWARDS,

ANTHONY

DOUGLAS

2 2

50

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

6 FAY, JUSTIN

PATRICK

64 79 8 16 6 80 253

STEWART, REID 68 68

SWIFT, PATTIE

PRATT

1 1

WILSON,

JEFFREY

RAYMOND

45 40 56 80 3 3 8 5 240

7 BECKENHAUER,

KURT MICHAEL

25 25

BURGEMEISTER,

ASHLEY

MORGAN

18 18

DEGANHART,

MARY E

96 121 1 1 1 40 63 323

HARVELL,

LAURA EH

127 127

HOWARD,

STEPHEN

ENDERLIN

1 1

JACKSON, D.

CORY

9 79 164 42 31 32 1 2 360

LOWENBACH,

JOHN ROBERT

1 1

MCDONALD,

JAMES R

1 1

MUNCH,

CHRISTOPHER J

1 1

MURPHY, SEAN

KENDALL

31 31

51

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

7 PATRICK, JAMES

STEVEN

95 132 2 76 4 30 12 4 10 365

PLOTZ,

KENNETH M

1 2 3

SCHULTZ,

STEVEN L

123 2 19 27 3 28 24 51 277

SPEAR,

MICHAEL JAMES

2 2

STANWAY,

STEPHEN

GREGG

121 121

THOMASSON,

LANE P

10 10

WALKER,

DOUGLAS S

1 1 2

YODER, KERI

ANN

196 44 50 6 45 2 6 1 9 359

ZEERIP, BO A 131 131

8 ARKIN, ANGELA

R

1 1

BERENATO,

MARY JOAN

1 1

BLANCO, SUSAN

JASMINE

195 3 1 1 200

BRINEGAR,

CARROLL

MICHELLE

23 252 2 277

CHRISTIANSEN,

DINA M

1 313 314

CURE, SARAH 384 51 148 583

52

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

8 BETH

DEAN, LAURIE

KAZUE

3 219 49 33 304

ECTON, KRAIG 4 4

ELLISON,

KATHARINE J

31 31

FINDLEY,

JOSEPH DEAN

135 1 510 646

GLOWINSKY,

CAROL

1 1

JOUARD,

STEPHEN JOHN

401 117 12 2 532

LAMMONS,

GREGORY M

371 6 2 157 536

LEHMAN,

JOSHUA BLAKE

39 1 40

LYNCH, THOMAS

L

23 23

MCDONALD,

DANIEL

MICHAEL

381 26 407

RYAN, CHELSEA

WILLIAMS

1 1

TUTTLE,

DINSMORE

1 1

VILLASENOR,

JUAN GONZALO

446 143 589

9 ANDREWS,

ASHLEY RENEE

9 9

53

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

9 JORDAN,

CLAUDIA JEAN

1 1

LYNCH, DENISE

K

144 63 90 5 3 11 45 361

METZGER, PAUL 12 10 22

MYER, ELISE

VICTORIA

8 7 10 5 3 18 51

NEILEY, JOHN

FOWLER

116 65 92 5 1 4 13 44 340

NORRDIN, ANNE

KIRKPATRICK

83 89 142 6 6 3 9 67 405

POTOTSKY,

JONATHAN

BRUCE

57 32 1 2 92

ROFF, ANGELA

M

51 51

SELDIN,

CHRISTOPHER

GILES

65 53 77 4 9 4 9 56 277

SHAMIS,

JONATHAN

KEITH

1 37 14 52

STRABLIZKY,

HOLLY KIRSNER

151 151

10 ALEXANDER,

WILLIAM DAVID

338 4 118 460

ERNST, ALLISON

PATRICIA

488 3 1 1 493

EYLER,

DEBORAH RENE

2 1 2 1 6

54

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

10 FIELDMAN,

STEVEN B

85 85

FLESHER,

THOMAS

BRADFORD

441 2 1 444

KARN,

KIMBERLY JO

1 1

MARKENSON,

AMIEL JOSHUA

510 3 1 514

MUNCH,

CHRISTOPHER J

1 1

O'SHEA,

TIMOTHY

MICHAEL

87 470 683 1,240

SCHWARTZ,

LARRY

CHARLES

15 15

SCHWARTZ,

LARRY EDWARD

1 1

SLETTA,

STEPHEN

JAMES

17 17

STYDUHAR,

GREGORY

JOSEPH

146 107 14 267

SWIFT, PATTIE

PRATT

1 1

THOMAS,

TAYLER MARIE

2 102 1 2 107

VELLAR,

MARGARET C

65 65

55

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

11 BULL, DIANA

CARENE

9 2 11

CAUSEY, INGA

HAAGENSON

1 1

GREEN, BRIAN

LOUIS

14 14

GROOME,

STEPHEN A

6 1 9 19 35

Halpin, Michael 1 1

HUNTER,

AMANDA

94 117 98 6 4 20 12 121 472

KEOHANE, PAUL

J

1 1

MARSHALL,

JULIE G

2 1 3

MURPHY,

PATRICK W

173 44 38 3 17 30 37 40 382

ROBAK,

ALEXANDRA

OLSEN

42 42

THORSON,

DAVID MORRIS

1 1

TURNER,

KAITLIN

BRIANNE

396 5 11 6 17 435

WENNER,

LYNETTE MARY

48 184 85 6 2 1 8 4 191 529

12 ACHESON, RUTH

M

2 2

CORTEZ, 225 53 2 27 307

56

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

12 KIMBERLY

DAWN

EPSTEIN, SCOTT

BRADFORD

4 2 6

GERBRACHT,

LESLIE JEAN

1 1

GONZALES,

MICHAEL A

189 4 26 1 19 239

HOPKINS,

AMANDA CLAIRE

44 5 1 7 28 3 116 44 248

KELLY, JASON T 28 28

MARTINEZ,

GILBERT

ANTHONY

1 1

NEWMYER-

OLSEN, CRISTA

LEE

138 3 18 2 1 30 113 294 599

SARMIENTO,

NICOLAS

56 56

SCHNEIDER,

BRITTANY

1 1

SCHUENEMANN,

CRAIG KARL

19 19

STENGER, JOHN 37 1 38

SULLIVAN,

TAMARA

MCSHERRY

19 248 267

WALKER,

DOUGLAS S

1 1

WALZL, DANIEL 52 52

57

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

12 AUSTIN

WOOD,

KIMBERLY LYNN

11 1 101 1 114

13 BRAMMER, RAY

ANN

24 24

BRANDENBURG,

DENNIS LEE

33 33

GAGLIANO,

STEPHANIE M G

159 75 66 10 17 2 6 56 391

GRINNAN,

MICHAEL KELLY

10 10

HAENLEIN,

JUSTIN

BRADLEY

179 74 118 22 15 39 27 130 604

HANSEN, KELLY

S

2 2

HOBBS,

CHARLES M

180 63 99 7 15 1 29 24 74 492

HOWARD,

STEPHEN

ENDERLIN

1 1

HOYER, KEVIN L 10 10

JAMES, ROBERT

CHARLES

159 81 111 6 17 27 21 66 488

JONES, KRISTEI

R

9 9

KILLIN, KIMBRA

L

7 7

KING, PAUL A 2 2

58

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

13 LANDRY, MYKA

MARIE

6 6

MCGUIRE, CARL

SIDNEY

167 15 58 14 20 2 5 23 54 358

VANNOY,

DOUGLAS

RAMAN

1 1

WEATHERBY,

JOSEPH J-C

1 1

14 CATANZARITE,

NICHOLAS

78 78

GARDNER,

SANDRA H

123 46 88 5 16 11 4 293

HERRINGER,

WILLIAM

LAURENCE

1 1

HOAK, MARY

CLARKSON

46 105 161 3 7 2 6 11 189 530

LABUDA, JUDITH

L

1 1

O'HARA,

MICHAEL

ANDREW

91 84 45 5 4 20 1 10 19 279

RODGERS,

FREDERIC

BARKER

1 1

SCHNEIDER,

BRITTANY

91 91

SPEAR,

MICHAEL JAMES

1 1

59

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

14 WILSON, ERIN

MICHELE

92 92

15 BRINKLEY,

STANLEY A

1 1

DAVIDSON,

MICHAEL JOHN

101 36 76 4 32 51 2 73 375

EIRING, DENI

ESTELLE

1 1

EPSTEIN, SCOTT

BRADFORD

1 1

JOHNSON,

TARRYN L

74 35 54 3 21 23 4 69 283

MACDONNELL,

MARK ANDREW

1 3 4

PORTER,

CURTIS LANE

15 15

VIGIL, SAMUEL

SCOTT

2 2

16 BOYCE, JEREMY

P

1 1

BRINKLEY,

STANLEY A

1 1

CLARK, LANCE

PALMER

4 4

DAVIDSON,

MICHAEL JOHN

2 2

EIRING, DENI

ESTELLE

17 17

EPSTEIN, SCOTT

BRADFORD

1 1

60

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

16 JOHNSON,

TARRYN L

1 1

KARN,

KIMBERLY JO

1 1

MACDONNELL,

MARK ANDREW

240 11 1 15 23 14 8 42 354

MANLEY,

DOUGLAS R

18 18

SCHIFERL,

MICHAEL

ANDREW

9 3 1 13

VIGIL, SAMUEL

SCOTT

142 93 2 13 8 1 35 11 2 307

17 ABSMEIER,

CARL J

2 2

BLACKETT,

DAVID R

1 1

DATZ, CARYN A 12 97 59 168

DEWICK,

AMANDA WILEY

361 361

DINNEL,

COURTNEY LEE

70 70

FINN, SEAN

PATRICK

327 273 62 662

FLAUM, MARTIN

JEFFREY

13 13

GROOME,

STEPHEN A

1 1

HOLBROOK,

SHARON D

462 2 1 465

61

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

17 HOWARD,

STEPHEN

ENDERLIN

1 1

IVEY, MARQUES

ALEXANDER

74 74

JIMENEZ, LARA

M

59 59

KIESNOWSKI,

ROBERT

WALTER

2 2

KIRBY, LEROY D 29 29

LIEBERMAN,

EMILY C

9 34 65 1 58 167

LOEW,

PRISCILLA J

243 10 29 10 67 359

LOWENBACH,

JOHN ROBERT

1 1

MARTIN, BRETT

M

488 5 5 498

MCINTYRE,

RAYNA GOKLI

1,019 1,019

MUNCH,

CHRISTOPHER J

1 1

NOWAK,

JOSHUA

THOMAS

70 70

PUGH, PATRICK

HAROLD

511 2 513

QUICK, DONALD

SPENCE

5 5 3 9 22

62

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

17 RAMIREZ,

ROBERTO

2 708 710

ROAN, PHILIP F 2 2

SEEDORF, KYLE 489 3 492

SMITH, JEFFREY

ALLEN

503 2 505

SOUTHERLAND,

KELLEY

REBECCA

1,047 1,047

SPEAR,

MICHAEL JAMES

1 1

STOUT, SARAH

ELIZABETH

788 788

STRAUS, JILL-

ELLYN

1 1

VASQUEZ, TERI

LYNN

359 523 882

VIELMA,

MARYANN

59 59

WARNER, MARK

DOUGLAS

389 7 1 397

18 AMICO,

MICHELLE ANN

4 15 1 15 35

ARKIN, ANGELA

R

2 2

BAKER,

LAQUNYA

LATRESE

449 4 453

BAUM, ANDREW 527 527

63

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

18 BOWLING,

LAWRENCE

RAYMOND

98 98

BOYETTE,

PALMER L

30 30

CONTIGUGLIA,

CHANTEL E

24 24

EDSON, JACOB

ALAN

418 7 1 426

FIELDS, KOLONY

LOREN

13 13

FIGA, BENJAMIN

TODD

4 456 3 463

GROHS,

DEBORAH J

1 1

GROOME,

STEPHEN A

1 1

HENDERSON,

THOMAS

WILLARD

428 428

HERNANDEZ,

MELINA

1 1

HERRON,

PATRICIA D

1 1

HOLMES,

JEFFREY K

1 13 14

HURST, HAROLD

CLAYBURN

69 49 28 3 8 4 26 300 407 894

KLINGENSMITH,

VICTORIA ELLEN

136 110 246

64

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

18 KRAMER, GARY

MICHAEL

522 1 2 5 530

LAFAVE, KELLY

ANN

25 25

LEUTWYLER,

BEN L

630 630

LINDSEY,

CAJARDO R

1 387 388

LOWENBACH,

JOHN ROBERT

2 2

LUNG, ROBERT

RAYMOND

479 4 483

LYMAN,

GREGORY G

1 1

MARTINEZ, ALEX

JOSEPH

1 1

MARTINEZ,

FREDERICK

THOMAS

1 1

MCLEAN,

BONNIE

HEATHER

106 20 4 15 33 20 57 2 257

MUNCH,

CHRISTOPHER J

2 2

PRATT,

CHARLES M

1 1

RINI, CHERYL

MIEKO

1 1

ROCHE,

MICHAEL J

25 25

65

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

18 ROMEO,

JEFFREY L

1 1

ROWLES-

STOKES,

CHERYL ANN

30 30

SIDEL, KEVIN 2 2

SLADE,

THERESA

MICHELLE

47 98 122 14 26 3 12 19 45 386

STRICKLIN,

NATALIE

GIRARD

499 1 500

STUART, RYAN

JAMES

456 9 3 468

TOUART,

DANIELLE

27 27

TOUSSAINT,

DON JESSE

717 1 718

VAHLE, DARREN

LOUIS

402 33 435

VOLZ,

ELIZABETH

BEEBE

725 725

WAIDLER, KELLY

ERIN

106 106

WHITAKER,

SHAY KARA

391 3 394

WHITE, ERIC

BARCLAY

346 7 353

WHITFIELD, 341 6 347

66

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

18 JOSEPH RILEY

WILLIFORD,

JOSHUA JAY

21 21

19 BRIGGS, JOHN

JOSEPH

25 25

DOAK, RENEE

SANDOVAL

39 39

ESSER, ALLISON

JILL

369 369

HARTMANN,

JAMES FRANCIS

2 2

HAUSE,

WARREN TROY

1 246 50 4 65 3 369

HOSKINS, JULIE

CHRISTINE

7 7 163 1 7 277 1,062 1,524

HOWARD,

STEPHEN

ENDERLIN

1 1

KERNS,

TIMOTHY

GERARD

396 2 398

KOPCOW,

MARCELO

ADRIAN

390 3 4 397

LABUDA, JUDITH

L

1 1

LYONS,

SHANNON

DOUGLAS

435 5 440

MEYER, 22 22

67

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

19 MICHELE LYNN

MUEHLENKAMP,

JAYME L

39 263 302

NICHOLS, DANA 42 42

SALEEBEY,

MEGHAN

PATRICE

339 3 4 346

TAYLOR, TODD L 579 37 616

VIGIL, VINCENTE

GERALDO

458 4 462

20 ARCHULETA,

DAVID ANTHONY

174 174

BAKKE, INGRID

SEFTAR

387 1 2 200 5 22 617

BRODSKY,

ELIZABETH

HOUSE

MOULTON

127 1 128

BUTLER,

PATRICK D

580 580

COLLINS, J

KEITH

309 2 168 296 775

GUNNING,

ROBERT

304 131 288 723

HAENSELMAN,

MONICA O

163 1 7 30 201

HARTMAN,

ANDREW

1 310 1 2 1 315

LANGER, BRUCE 1 411 1 1 414

68

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

20 LINDSEY, DEA M 329 1 1 169 290 790

LYMAN,

GREGORY G

1 1

MALKINSON,

ZACHARY ILYA

166 1 167

MARTIN,

JONATHON P

13 1 14

MULVAHILL,

THOMAS

FRANCIS

367 1 368

MUNCH,

CHRISTOPHER J

2 2

SALOMONE,

NANCY

WOODRUFF

566 566

SATTER,

RAYMOND

NATHAN

1 1

SIERRA, NORMA

ANGELICA

1 40 41

TUTTLE,

DINSMORE

3 1 4

VALLEJOS,

MICHAEL JAMES

2 2

21 BARRETT,

MATTHEW

DAVID

359 83 207 7 2 1 1 660

CHAFFIN,

JEREMY L

1 3 1 61 15 9 279 640 1,009

DUNKELMAN, 1 1

69

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

21 PAUL RISLEY

FLYNN, BRIAN

JAMES

351 261 190 2 2 3 809

GRANGER,

RUSSELL

HOLTON

1 1

GRATTAN,

MICHAEL

JOSEPH

66 66

GROHS,

DEBORAH J

1 1

GURLEY,

RICHARD

THOMAS

354 72 198 3 1 628

HENDERSON,

CRAIG PETER

54 54

KARN,

KIMBERLY JO

1 1

LARSON,

GRETCHEN

BUCK

343 81 184 5 2 2 617

LYMAN,

GREGORY G

1 1

RAAUM, BRUCE

ROSS

62 62

ROBISON,

VALERIE JO

291 71 196 8 1 567

SWIFT, PATTIE

PRATT

1 1 2

WALKER, 1 1 1 3

70

Terminated Cases by Judge

District/Judge CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

21 DOUGLAS S

22 BACA, ANTHONY

NATHANIEL

2 2

CISNEROS,

THERESA M

1 1

LAWRENCE,

JENNILYNN

EVERETT

120 120

MARGESON,

MATTHEW

GREGORY

5 5

PLEWE, TODD

JAY

219 11 16 9 83 5 6 98 447

WALKER,

DOUGLAS S

3 3 2 1 1 39 49

25 CLARK, LAURIE

A

67 84 89 240

HERNANDEZ,

MELINA

2 2

MOULTRIE, PAX

LEIA

61 54 99 214

WOODS, DAVID

BRETT

74 111 7 123 315

Total 39,874 21,431 607 17,683 1,158 1,575 167 2,141 4,501 9,230 98,367

71

Open Cases by Judge

Open Cases: Dec 8, 2023

72

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

1 ARP, RANDALL C 237 71 36 344

BACHMEYER,

CHRISTIE ANN

1 1

BURBACK,

BRADLEY ALLEN

57 57

CARPENTER,

VERNA L

144 144

CARRITHERS,

JASON D

223 53 34 310

CONTIGUGLIA,

CHANTEL E

1 1

GLOWINSKY,

CAROL

1 1

GOMAN, KEITH 153 153

HALL, DENNIS

JAMES

2 2

HUNT, DIEGO G 232 91 42 365

KLEIN, RUSSELL

BRENT

300 72 38 410

MAGID, CORINNE

MICHELE

115 115

MCNULTY, PHILIP

JAMES

221 68 42 331

MEINSTER, ANN

GAIL

1 2 5 15 105 128

MELTON,

JENNIFER LYNN

123 123

MUNCH,

CHRISTOPHER J

1 1

73

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

1 OEFFLER, LILY

WALLMAN

1 1 2

PEPER, GRAHAM

B

141 141

PILKINGTON,

JEFFREY RALPH

274 16 7 297

RANDALL, MARK

MARROW

135 135

RHAMEY,

CHRISTOPHER

BLAKE

259 59 50 368

RODGERS,

FREDERIC

BARKER

15 15

RUSSELL,

TAMARA S

203 79 46 1 329

VANGILDER,

LINDSAY L

168 65 39 272

VRIESMAN, TODD

L

102 105 86 293

WHEELER,

KRISTAN K

101 101

ZENISEK,

CHRISTOPHER

CLAYTON

221 60 34 315

2 ANTOUN,

CHRISTINE

CATHERINE

529 2 1 532

ARNOLDS, LISA

CHRISTINE

790 3 793

74

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

2 BAILEY, MARK T 191 191

BAUMANN,

CHRISTOPHER

JAY

1 149 150

BLAND, NIKEA

TANISHA

537 2 539

BOYETTE,

PALMER L

262 262

BRODY, KAREN L 557 1 558

DORANCY, JILL

DEBORAH

198 198

EGELHOFF,

MARTIN FOSTER

3 179 182

ELLIFF, J ERIC 179 179

ENGLERT,

ERICKA F.

HOUCK

527 2 529

ESPINOSA, ADAM

JOSEPH

379 3 382

GERDES,

KANDACE

CECILIA

195 195

GOLDBERG,

DAVID H

185 185

GRANT, JAY

SUTHERLAND

554 3 557

JOHNSON, ERIC

MARTIN

559 3 562

JONES, A BRUCE 541 6 547

75

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

2 KING, PAUL A 3 3

LABUDA, JUDITH

L

3 3

LEITH,

ELIZABETH

DEMBERG

9 93 169 271

LOWENBACH,

JOHN ROBERT

1 1

LUXEN, ANDREW

J

217 217

MCCALLIN,

ANDREW

PATRICK

9 317 326

MOSES, MARIE

AVERY

5 349 354

MYERS, ALEX C 479 4 483

OLAFSON, JON

JAY

198 198

SCHUTTE, ANITA

MARIE

6 288 294

SCOVILLE,

STEPHANIE

LINDQUIST

203 203

SHOCKLEY,

DARRYL F

566 6 572

SPEAR, MICHAEL

JAMES

1 1

TORRINGTON,

JENNIFER

BOURN

1 3 291 295

76

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

2 TRUJILLO,

DEMETRIA

ELIZABETH

4 294 298

WALLACE,

SARAH BLOCK

183 183

3 EPSTEIN, SCOTT

BRADFORD

1 1

EYLER,

DEBORAH RENE

1 1

FOWLER, PIERCE

LOGAN

131 47 51 9 5 14 3 14 274

GERBRACHT,

LESLIE JEAN

80 1 4 1 86

KARN, KIMBERLY

JO

2 1 3

KOLOMITZ, M

JON

1 1 2

MANN, DAWN

MARIE

18 40 91 16 165

MCKISSON, J.

CLAY

172 28 15 8 25 5 6 259

MOCHEL, JOHN

DAVID

17 17

4 ANKENY,

CHARLOTTE

ADAMS

24 24

BAIN, WILLIAM B 278 44 322

BENTLEY, ERIC 9 236 245

BILLINGS VELA,

LINDA

323 1 18 77 25 444

77

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

4 MARGARET

BRADY, JILL M 400 2 45 447

BURNEY,

SAMORREYAN

VALECIA

24 24

CHITTUM, ROBIN

LYNN

378 84 462

CURTIS, JESSICA

LYN

395 1 47 2 445

EPSTEIN, SCOTT

BRADFORD

1 1

EVIG, SAMUEL

ALBERT

400 2 41 443

EYLER,

DEBORAH RENE

3 3

FENNICK,

YOLANDA MIRIAM

15 15

FINDORFF,

LAURA NORRIS

353 64 1 418

GERBRACHT,

LESLIE JEAN

2 2

GERHART,

SHANNON MARIE

28 7 35

GILBERT, DAVID

A

303 141 3 447

GOMEZ, MONICA

JO

417 82 499

GRANGER,

RUSSELL

HOLTON

2 1 3

78

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

4 GROHS,

DEBORAH J

1 1 2

HALL, RICHARD

VONLEVERN

1 1

HENSON,

MARCUS SHANE

574 55 629

JOHNSON,

FRANCES RENAE

563 46 1 1 611

KANE, THOMAS

KELLY

1 363 1 365

KARN, KIMBERLY

JO

22 22

KATZMAN,

STEVEN

39 39

KILGORE,

THERESA LYNN

48 48

LAFF, KENNETH

MARTIN

1 1

LOONEY, MARY

JANE

3 3

MAY, DIANA K 340 9 67 416

MCGUIRE,

DENNIS L

24 24

MCHENRY,

MICHAEL P

420 133 1 554

MCKEDY,

CYNTHIA ANN

18 18

MILLER, CHAD

CLAYTON

326 1 60 387

79

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

4 MILLER, G DAVID 1 1

MITCHELL

HELTON,

CATHERINE

DIANE

380 1 74 1 456

MULLINS,

RONALD M

2 2

MUNCH,

CHRISTOPHER J

2 1 3

PARRISH, DAVID

DILLWYN

1 1

PATRICK,

MEREDITH ANN

25 25

PEACOCK,

DULCE DENISE

38 1 39

PLOTZ, KENNETH

M

1 1

PRINCE, DAVID

SCOTT

5 113 42 160

PRUDEK, MARLA

R

1 97 42 140

ROTOLO, ANN

MARIA

28 28

SELLS, SCOTT A 195 44 72 8 12 28 27 386

SHAKES, DAVID

LEE

501 124 625

SOKOL, ERIN

LYNN

374 30 404

SPEAR, MICHAEL

JAMES

2 2

80

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

4 TRUJILLO,

DEMETRIA

ELIZABETH

2 2

VALLEJOS,

MICHAEL JAMES

1 1

WERNER,

GREGORY

ROBERT

3 173 29 205

5 CASIAS, EDWARD

JUDE

301 301

CAUSEY, INGA

HAAGENSON

531 1 532

CHEROUTES,

CATHERINE JANE

82 53 79 9 17 2 12 2 19 275

DUNKELMAN,

PAUL RISLEY

109 9 118

GRANGER,

RUSSELL

HOLTON

1 1

HART, RICHARD

H

1 1

HOWARD,

STEPHEN

ENDERLIN

1 1

JONES, CYNTHIA

JOLENE

160 19 179

LASS, DAVID

RICHARD

1 1

LOWENBACH,

JOHN ROBERT

1 1

81

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

5 MOORHEAD,

ROBERT

THOMAS

1 1

OLGUIN-

FRESQUEZ,

RACHEL J

94 8 93 30 225

OWENS, REED W 56 53 45 13 9 3 7 186

PATTON, D

WAYNE

4 1 5

ROMEO, KAREN

ANN

83 51 31 10 2 4 5 186

RUCKRIEGLE,

WILLIAM TERRY

1 1

SATTER,

RAYMOND

NATHAN

2 2

SCHAUER,

HILBERT

1 1

SCOTT, JOHN

GREGORY

76 76

SHAMIS,

JONATHAN KEITH

134 14 101 3 2 7 36 297

6 BACA, ANTHONY

NATHANIEL

220 24 16 16 9 7 14 306

CARLSON,

SUZANNE

FAIRCHILD

193 38 1 15 8 255

CISNEROS,

THERESA M

1 1

EDWARDS, 7 7

82

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

6 ANTHONY

DOUGLAS

EYLER,

DEBORAH RENE

1 1

FAY, JUSTIN

PATRICK

120 11 28 17 11 13 200

KARN, KIMBERLY

JO

1 1

LYMAN,

GREGORY G

1 1

MINOT, MARTHA

TINSLEY

62 62

STEWART, REID 71 71

WALKER,

DOUGLAS S

3 1 6 10

WILSON,

JEFFREY

RAYMOND

64 31 77 45 4 1 222

7 BECKENHAUER,

KURT MICHAEL

21 21

BURGEMEISTER,

ASHLEY

MORGAN

58 58

CISNEROS,

THERESA M

1 1

DEGANHART,

MARY E

94 72 29 1 6 18 220

EYLER,

DEBORAH RENE

1 1

FLYNN, BRIAN 1 1

83

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

7 JAMES

GROHS,

DEBORAH J

1 1 2

HARVELL, LAURA

EH

273 273

JACKSON, D.

CORY

14 68 123 2 2 3 37 3 252

MCDONALD,

JAMES R

3 3

MURPHY, SEAN

KENDALL

55 55

PATRICK, JAMES

STEVEN

102 54 5 49 1 5 10 18 244

PLOTZ, KENNETH

M

3 3

SCHULTZ,

STEVEN L

171 1 4 7 24 26 1 24 258

STANWAY,

STEPHEN

GREGG

86 86

THOMASSON,

LANE P

23 23

WALKER,

DOUGLAS S

1 1

YODER, KERI

ANN

184 23 42 21 1 271

ZEERIP, BO A 136 136

8 BLANCO, SUSAN

JASMINE

442 1 443

84

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

8 BRINEGAR,

CARROLL

MICHELLE

21 153 1 175

CHRISTIANSEN,

DINA M

706 706

CROSS,

CHRISTOPHER

CHARLES

1 1

CURE, SARAH

BETH

491 23 41 555

DEAN, LAURIE

KAZUE

1 114 10 1 2 128

ECTON, KRAIG 4 4

ELLISON,

KATHARINE J

39 39

FIELD, JULIE

KUNCE

1 1

FINDLEY,

JOSEPH DEAN

81 3 17 101

JOUARD,

STEPHEN JOHN

512 96 6 1 615

LAMMONS,

GREGORY M

546 6 56 608

LEHMAN,

JOSHUA BLAKE

36 36

LOWENBACH,

JOHN ROBERT

1 1

LYNCH, THOMAS

L

26 26

MCDONALD, 467 19 1 487

85

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

8 DANIEL MICHAEL

ODELL, DEVIN R 1 1

RYAN, CHELSEA

WILLIAMS

1 1

TUTTLE,

DINSMORE

2 1 3

VILLASENOR,

JUAN GONZALO

529 92 621

9 ANDREWS,

ASHLEY RENEE

9 9

FERNANDEZ-ELY,

ERIN

6 6

LYNCH, DENISE K 255 85 74 2 1 2 3 24 446

MYER, ELISE

VICTORIA

27 36 99 4 4 12 1 7 190

NEILEY, JOHN

FOWLER

290 69 62 1 2 2 25 451

NORRDIN, ANNE

KIRKPATRICK

174 83 74 2 2 6 12 353

POTOTSKY,

JONATHAN

BRUCE

53 5 1 59

ROFF, ANGELA M 69 69

SELDIN,

CHRISTOPHER

GILES

146 116 11 74 2 4 4 4 23 384

SHAMIS,

JONATHAN KEITH

1 1

STRABLIZKY, 260 260

86

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

9 HOLLY KIRSNER

10 ALEXANDER,

WILLIAM DAVID

222 5 2 159 388

CISNEROS,

THERESA M

1 1

ERNST, ALLISON

PATRICIA

578 1 1 6 586

EYLER,

DEBORAH RENE

2 2

FIELDMAN,

STEVEN B

41 41

FLESHER,

THOMAS

BRADFORD

462 6 468

GRANGER,

RUSSELL

HOLTON

1 1

KOLOMITZ, M

JON

1 1

MACDONNELL,

MARK ANDREW

1 1

MARKENSON,

AMIEL JOSHUA

390 390

MARTINEZ,

GILBERT

ANTHONY

1 1

O'SHEA,

TIMOTHY

MICHAEL

87 82 220 389

SLETTA, 13 13

87

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

10 STEPHEN JAMES

STYDUHAR,

GREGORY

JOSEPH

34 26 9 4 73

THOMAS,

TAYLER MARIE

106 99 205

VELLAR,

MARGARET C

42 42

11 BULL, DIANA

CARENE

15 8 23

FLESHER,

THOMAS

BRADFORD

1 1

GREEN, BRIAN

LOUIS

2 2

Halpin, Michael 2 2

HUNTER,

AMANDA

156 92 58 1 7 14 18 346

MURPHY,

PATRICK W

197 13 42 2 17 1 33 4 11 320

PLOTZ, KENNETH

M

1 1

ROBAK,

ALEXANDRA

OLSEN

52 52

TURNER, KAITLIN

BRIANNE

277 20 7 3 6 313

WENNER,

LYNETTE MARY

104 88 39 3 2 4 30 270

12 ACHESON, RUTH 8 8

88

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

12 M

CISNEROS,

THERESA M

1 1

CORTEZ,

KIMBERLY DAWN

197 14 1 27 2 241

EPSTEIN, SCOTT

BRADFORD

1 1

EYLER,

DEBORAH RENE

2 2

GERBRACHT,

LESLIE JEAN

1 1

GONZALES,

MARTIN A

1 1

GONZALES,

MICHAEL A

176 3 23 14 1 1 218

GROHS,

DEBORAH J

2 2

HAYES, PATRICK

HENRY

1 1

HOPKINS,

AMANDA CLAIRE

37 1 3 8 2 10 1 86 148

KELLY, JASON T 56 56

LENTZ, FRANK

STANNARD

6 6

NEWMYER-

OLSEN, CRISTA

LEE

4 61 2 2 7 18 4 143 241

PEARSON,

AMANDA KAY

11 11

89

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

12 PLOTZ, KENNETH

M

1 1

SARMIENTO,

NICOLAS

84 84

SCHUENEMANN,

CRAIG KARL

51 51

STENGER, JOHN 112 112

SULLIVAN,

TAMARA

MCSHERRY

31 163 194

SWIFT, PATTIE

PRATT

5 1 6

TIDBALL, JANE A 1 1

WALKER,

DOUGLAS S

1 1

WALZL, DANIEL

AUSTIN

162 2 164

WOOD,

KIMBERLY LYNN

29 2 31

13 BRAMMER, RAY

ANN

36 36

BRANDENBURG,

DENNIS LEE

53 53

GAGLIANO,

STEPHANIE M G

299 22 25 5 15 17 1 10 394

GRINNAN,

MICHAEL KELLY

6 1 7

HAENLEIN,

JUSTIN BRADLEY

194 29 60 2 13 12 20 330

90

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

13 HANSEN, KELLY

S

4 4

HOBBS,

CHARLES M

297 43 60 17 1 34 3 30 485

HOYER, KEVIN L 6 8 1 2 17

JAMES, ROBERT

CHARLES

282 36 44 1 17 1 37 2 25 445

JONES, KRISTEI

R

12 12

KILLIN, KIMBRA L 8 8

LANDRY, MYKA

MARIE

1 1

MCGUIRE, CARL

SIDNEY

302 4 31 3 8 12 6 5 371

SINGER,

MICHAEL KEITH

1 1 4 2 8

14 CATANZARITE,

NICHOLAS

186 186

GARDNER,

SANDRA H

94 15 81 3 11 4 7 215

HILL, SHELLEY

ANN

1 1

HOAK, MARY

CLARKSON

52 65 129 1 8 4 1 24 284

MUNCH,

CHRISTOPHER J

1 1

O'HARA,

MICHAEL

ANDREW

60 70 75 1 1 4 1 5 4 221

91

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

14 RUCKRIEGLE,

WILLIAM TERRY

1 1

SCHNEIDER,

BRITTANY

111 111

TUTTLE,

DINSMORE

1 1

WILSON, ERIN

MICHELE

115 115

15 BRINKLEY,

STANLEY A

1 1

DAVIDSON,

MICHAEL JOHN

136 14 38 3 25 1 22 7 246

DAVIS, GARY W 1 1

EYLER,

DEBORAH RENE

1 1

JOHNSON,

TARRYN L

124 18 39 1 13 28 16 239

PORTER, CURTIS

LANE

12 12

TALLMAN, P

DOUGLAS

5 5

16 BOYCE, JEREMY

P

1 1

CLARK, LANCE

PALMER

7 7

DAVIDSON,

MICHAEL JOHN

2 1 1 4

EIRING, DENI

ESTELLE

20 20

92

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

16 EPSTEIN, SCOTT

BRADFORD

1 1

JOHNSON,

TARRYN L

1 1 1 3

KARN, KIMBERLY

JO

1 1

KOLOMITZ, M

JON

1 1 1 3

MACDONNELL,

MARK ANDREW

277 6 1 14 15 1 42 356

MANLEY,

DOUGLAS R

13 13

PLOTZ, KENNETH

M

1 1

VIGIL, SAMUEL

SCOTT

207 47 2 15 34 4 309

17 BOWEN, BRIAN

NATHANIEL

1 1

COX, MICHAEL

ANDREW

1 1

DANG, CINDY HT 1 1

DATZ, CARYN A 2 3 113 100 218

DEWICK,

AMANDA WILEY

535 535

DINNEL,

COURTNEY LEE

580 580

EYLER,

DEBORAH RENE

1 1

FINN, SEAN 134 199 2 335

93

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

17 PATRICK

GLOWINSKY,

CAROL

1 1

GROOME,

STEPHEN A

2 2

HOLBROOK,

SHARON D

431 1 432

IVEY, MARQUES

ALEXANDER

501 501

JIMENEZ, LARA M 543 543

KIESNOWSKI,

ROBERT WALTER

2 2

KING, PAUL A 1 1

KIRBY, LEROY D 177 177

LIEBERMAN,

EMILY C

6 2 62 82 152

LOEW, PRISCILLA

J

269 1 7 52 12 38 379

LOWENBACH,

JOHN ROBERT

1 1 2

MARTIN, BRETT

M

517 7 6 530

MCINTYRE,

RAYNA GOKLI

1 669 670

NOWAK, JOSHUA

THOMAS

533 533

PUGH, PATRICK

HAROLD

614 1 1 616

94

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

17 QUICK, DONALD

SPENCE

34 2 73 109

RAMIREZ,

ROBERTO

1 404 3 408

RAPPAPORT,

SHEILA ANN

1 1

RODGERS,

FREDERIC

BARKER

1 1

SEEDORF, KYLE 610 2 1 613

SMITH, JEFFREY

ALLEN

501 2 503

SOUTHERLAND,

KELLEY

REBECCA

619 1 620

STOUT, SARAH

ELIZABETH

363 363

TUTTLE,

DINSMORE

1 1

VASQUEZ, TERI

LYNN

209 364 573

VIELMA,

MARYANN

596 596

WARNER, MARK

DOUGLAS

493 2 1 496

18 AMICO,

MICHELLE ANN

3 2 1 13 19

ANDERSON,

EMILY

ELIZABETH

1 1

95

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

18 ANTRIM,

MARILYN

LEONARD

1 2 3

ARKIN, ANGELA R 2 1 3

BAKER,

LAQUNYA

LATRESE

458 458

BAUM, ANDREW 1 316 1 318

BOWLING,

LAWRENCE

RAYMOND

237 237

BOYETTE,

PALMER L

81 81

CISNEROS,

THERESA M

2 1 3

COLLINS, F

STEPHEN

1 1

CONTIGUGLIA,

CHANTEL E

22 22

CROSS,

CHRISTOPHER

CHARLES

1 1

EDSON, JACOB

ALAN

543 1 544

ELLIFF, J ERIC 3 3

FELDMAN,

ETHAN DAVID

1 1

FIELDS, KOLONY

LOREN

13 13

FIGA, BENJAMIN 2 321 323

96

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

18 TODD

GROHS,

DEBORAH J

2 2

GROOME,

STEPHEN A

1 1 2

HENDERSON,

CRAIG PETER

1 1

HENDERSON,

THOMAS

WILLARD

388 388

HERRON,

PATRICIA D

11 11

HOLMES,

JEFFREY K

96 96

HOWARD,

STEPHEN

ENDERLIN

1 1

HURST, HAROLD

CLAYBURN

76 7 20 3 1 47 1 66 221

KLINGENSMITH,

VICTORIA ELLEN

23 216 239

KRAMER, GARY

MICHAEL

281 4 2 4 291

LAFAVE, KELLY

ANN

14 14

LEOPOLD, JOHN

P

2 2

LEUTWYLER,

BEN L

349 349

LINDSEY, 323 323

97

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

18 CAJARDO R

LOWENBACH,

JOHN ROBERT

1 1

LUNG, ROBERT

RAYMOND

296 296

MADDEN, JOHN

WILLIAM

1 1

MARTINEZ,

FREDERICK

THOMAS

1 1

MCLEAN, BONNIE

HEATHER

56 5 7 54 6 95 223

MEYER, WILLIAM

GUTHRIE

3 3

OLLADA, ANNE

MARIE

1 1

PLOTZ, KENNETH

M

1 1

POST, CHERYL L 31 1 32

PRATT, CHARLES

M

3 3

ROCHE, MICHAEL

J

23 23

ROWLES-

STOKES, CHERYL

ANN

22 22

SAMOUR,

CARLOS A

1 1

SCHWARTZ,

LARRY EDWARD

1 1

98

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

18 SLADE, THERESA

MICHELLE

55 61 97 2 19 16 1 31 282

STRICKLIN,

NATALIE GIRARD

559 2 561

STUART, RYAN

JAMES

561 2 11 574

TOUART,

DANIELLE

12 12

TOUSSAINT, DON

JESSE

299 2 1 1 303

VAHLE, DARREN

LOUIS

489 23 512

VOLZ, ELIZABETH

BEEBE

19 346 2 367

WAIDLER, KELLY

ERIN

604 604

WEISHAUPL,

ELIZABETH ANN

1 1

WHITAKER, SHAY

KARA

507 2 509

WHITE, ERIC

BARCLAY

585 7 1 593

WHITFIELD,

JOSEPH RILEY

580 4 584

WILLIFORD,

JOSHUA JAY

29 29

19 BRIGGS, JOHN

JOSEPH

53 53

DAVIS, RANDALL

JOSEPH

1 1

99

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

19 DOAK, RENEE

SANDOVAL

55 55

ESSER, ALLISON

JILL

888 4 6 898

HAUSE, WARREN

TROY

187 6 1 125 319

HOSKINS, JULIE

CHRISTINE

3 1 27 1 3 3 233 271

KERNS, TIMOTHY

GERARD

841 1 842

KLEIN, ROGER A 4 4

KOPCOW,

MARCELO

ADRIAN

746 2 1 749

LAFF, KENNETH

MARTIN

1 1

LOWENBACH,

JOHN ROBERT

1 1

LYONS,

SHANNON

DOUGLAS

1 233 10 2 1 247

MEYER, MICHELE

LYNN

38 38

MUEHLENKAMP,

JAYME L

24 54 78

NICHOLS, DANA 46 46

SALEEBEY,

MEGHAN

PATRICE

787 2 789

SIERRA, NORMA 1 1

100

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

19 ANGELICA

TAYLOR, TODD L 261 32 293

VIGIL, VINCENTE

GERALDO

571 2 2 575

20 ANDERSON,

EMILY

ELIZABETH

1 1

ARCHULETA,

DAVID ANTHONY

231 1 232

ARKIN, ANGELA R 1 1

BAKKE, INGRID

SEFTAR

421 1 182 4 19 627

BRODSKY,

ELIZABETH

HOUSE

MOULTON

208 208

BUTLER,

PATRICK D

608 1 609

COLLINS, J KEITH 245 2 4 72 323

GROOME,

STEPHEN A

1 1

GUNNING,

ROBERT

240 2 62 304

HAENSELMAN,

MONICA O

206 1 207

HARTMAN,

ANDREW

185 185

HARTMANN,

JAMES FRANCIS

1 1 2

101

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

20 HOWARD,

STEPHEN

ENDERLIN

2 1 3

LAFF, KENNETH

MARTIN

1 1

LANGER, BRUCE 181 1 182

LINDQUIST,

GAYLA REED

1 1

LINDSEY, DEA M 202 1 2 1 5 94 305

MALKINSON,

ZACHARY ILYA

212 212

MARTIN,

JONATHON P

10 10

MEYER, WILLIAM

GUTHRIE

1 1

MULLINS,

RONALD M

1 1 2

MULVAHILL,

THOMAS

FRANCIS

7 154 1 1 163

MUNCH,

CHRISTOPHER J

1 1

PLOTZ, KENNETH

M

1 3 4

SALOMONE,

NANCY

WOODRUFF

716 716

SATTER,

RAYMOND

NATHAN

3 3

102

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

20 TUTTLE,

DINSMORE

2 1 1 4

VALLEJOS,

MICHAEL JAMES

1 1 2

VOLZ, ELIZABETH

BEEBE

2 2

ZENISEK,

CHRISTOPHER

CLAYTON

22 22

21 BARRETT,

MATTHEW DAVID

288 52 153 1 2 1 27 524

CHAFFIN,

JEREMY L

31 3 12 3 6 30 167 252

CISNEROS,

THERESA M

1 1

FLYNN, BRIAN

JAMES

376 52 134 3 1 4 570

GRATTAN,

MICHAEL

JOSEPH

131 131

GURLEY,

RICHARD

THOMAS

270 45 151 1 1 10 478

HENDERSON,

CRAIG PETER

168 168

LARSON,

GRETCHEN BUCK

328 37 170 1 10 546

RAAUM, BRUCE

ROSS

155 155

ROBISON, 293 52 146 2 10 503

103

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

21 VALERIE JO

RUCKRIEGLE,

WILLIAM TERRY

1 1

TIDBALL, JANE A 1 2 3

TUTTLE,

DINSMORE

1 1

22 KOLOMITZ, M

JON

2 2

LAWRENCE,

JENNILYNN

EVERETT

205 9 214

MARGESON,

MATTHEW

GREGORY

15 15

PLEWE, TODD

JAY

197 14 31 8 3 1 20 274

WALKER,

DOUGLAS S

1 2 3

25 ASHBY, KAREN

MICHELE

1 1

CLARK, LAURIE A 10 91 137 238

HERNANDEZ,

MELINA

5 5

MOULTRIE, PAX

LEIA

17 47 183 247

SCHMALBERGER,

DONNA J

3 3 6

SPEAR, MICHAEL

JAMES

1 1

104

Open Cases by Judge

By Judge - Open

Cases

CR -

Criminal

CV -

Civil -

District

CW -

Water

DR -

Domestic

Relations

JA -

Juvenile

Adoption

JD -Juvenile

Delinquency

JR -Juvenile

Relinquishment

JV -

Juvenile

MH -

Mental

Health

PR -

Probate

Total

25 WOODS, DAVID

BRETT

13 82 3 154 252

Total 52,984 11,670 695 10,009 249 1,437 40 2,461 321 2,275 82,141

105

Prompts: Filters

Date Range for New Cases and Terminated Cases: Between

Jul 1, 2022 and Jun 30, 2023

This report pulls District Court cases only.

Open Cases as of: Dec 8, 2023 Open cases are pulled for open, active warrants (WOPN and WCLD) and reopen cases.

Terminated cases are based on the following event codes: CLAD, CLCN, CLDC, CLDM,

CLLP, CLNC, CLNP, CLTR, CLVC, or POST.

106

Colorado Judicial Branch

SCAO Text Reminder Statistics

Senate Bill 19-036

Report Period: Jul 1, 2022 through Jun 30, 2023

Table of Contents

Report Information

3

Failure to Appear Rate for All Scheduled Events

5

Cases with a Held Hearing vs. Cases with a Held Hearing and an Opt-In

8

Total Opt Outs Recorded in the Case Management System

11

Report Information

SCAO Text Reminder Rollout Schedule

Location Go Live Date

District 7, 12, 14 and Lincoln, Dolores Counties 1/1/2020

District 2, 25 (Denver Juv), 9, 11 6/2/2020

District 1, 6, 13, 16 6/9/2020

District 3, 15, 17, 21 6/16/2020

District 4, 5, 8, 20 6/23/2020

District 10, 19, and Arapahoe, Douglas, Elbert, Montezuma Counties. 6/30/2020

Definitions

Total Held Scheduled Events

This is defined as any scheduled event in a CR, T, M or JD case that was held.

Total Failure to Appear

This is defined as any CR, T, M or JD case where the scheduled event has a status of PFTA (Party Failed to Appear).

FTA Rate

(Total Failure to Appear) / (Total Held Scheduled Events)

Held Hearings in Districts that Offer Text Reminder Option

This is defined as any unique case that had a hearing held in the reporting period selected. If you picked a reporting

period that is prior to a location's Go Live Date, then those hearings are not counted until after the Go Live Date.

Hearings where the court date was continued, vacated or where the party failed to appear are not considered unless

there was another hearing in the case during that timeframe where the hearing was held.

Total Cases with a Held Hearing and an Opt-In

This is defined as any case where at least one party opted in for text reminders and a hearing was held during the

reporting period. In Felony Criminal, Misdemeanor and Traffic cases only the defendant may opt-in for a text reminder.

In Juvenile Delinquency cases both the Respondent Parent and the Child may opt-in for a text reminder. If the

Respondent Parent and the Child both opt-in for reminders, the case is only counted once. (Likewise, if only the

Respondent parent opts in, the case is still only counted once.)

% Cases with a Held Hearing and an Opt-In

(Total Cases with an Opt-In) / (Total Cases with a Held Hearing While Live on Text Reminder)

Held Scheduled Event

Held Events are defined as any scheduled event that does not have a status of CNCA, CNCT, CONT, or VACT.

Scheduled Events do not include REVW, ENDJ, REVD, or RVDF.

Total Opt Outs

A defendant or juvenile participant may opt out of text reminders through the court which is documented in the court

case management system or through the vendor via text message. This metric contains data from the case

management system. A separate report will be included with data from the vendor.

3

Denver County Court is not included in this report.

Reporting Period:

4

Failure to Appear Rate for All Scheduled Events

District and Court Location

Total Held Scheduled Events Total Failure to Appear FTA Rate

1 24 Gilpin County 4,720 846 17.92%

30 Jefferson County 72,193 9,980 13.82%

2 16 Denver District 31,177 3,394 10.89%

3 28 Huerfano County 3,393 305 8.99%

36 Las Animas County 5,190 433 8.34%

4 21 El Paso County 193,907 15,655 8.07%

60 Teller County 7,250 681 9.39%

5 10 Clear Creek County 3,864 526 13.61%

19 Eagle County 9,890 1,001 10.12%

33 Lake County 2,537 170 6.70%

59 Summit County 7,041 668 9.49%

66 Eagle County - BASALT 531 79 14.88%

6 4 Archuleta County 4,074 326 8.00%

34 La Plata County 14,642 1,641 11.21%

56 San Juan County 153 7 4.58%

7 15 Delta County 7,914 1,056 13.34%

26 Gunnison County 5,025 382 7.60%

27 Hinsdale County 100 17 17.00%

43 Montrose County 7,875 1,038 13.18%

46 Ouray County 815 52 6.38%

57 San Miguel County 1,057 103 9.74%

67 Montrose County-Nucla 592 64 10.81%

8 29 Jackson County 423 22 5.20%

35 Larimer County 60,641 5,906 9.74%

85 Larimer County Court-Loveland 14,884 2,255 15.15%

9 23 Garfield County 9,206 925 10.05%

49 Pitkin County 2,953 249 8.43%

52 Rio Blanco County 625 64 10.24%

64 Garfield County-Rifle 5,729 501 8.74%

65 Rio Blanco County, Rangely 382 41 10.73%

10 51 Pueblo County 43,259 3,923 9.07%

11 8 Chaffee County 7,991 439 5.49%

14 Custer County 827 63 7.62%

22 Fremont County 10,822 858 7.93%

47 Park County 3,046 214 7.03%

5

Failure to Appear Rate for All Scheduled Events

District and Court Location

Total Held Scheduled Events Total Failure to Appear FTA Rate

12 2 Alamosa County 7,550 610 8.08%

11 Conejos County 2,458 206 8.38%

12 Costilla County 2,052 116 5.65%

40 Mineral County 239 39 16.32%

53 Rio Grande County 4,364 335 7.68%

55 Saguache County 1,655 152 9.18%

13 32 Kit Carson County 2,229 203 9.11%

38 Logan County 5,578 592 10.61%

44 Morgan County 10,040 842 8.39%

48 Phillips County 362 29 8.01%

58 Sedgwick County 506 68 13.44%

61 Washington County 673 61 9.06%

63 Yuma County 1,339 124 9.26%

14 25 Grand County 2,668 362 13.57%

41 Moffat County 7,811 552 7.07%

54 Routt County 5,556 324 5.83%

15 5 Baca County 930 81 8.71%

9 Cheyenne County 285 42 14.74%

31 Kiowa County 381 59 15.49%

50 Prowers County 5,651 519 9.18%

16 6 Bent County 1,531 146 9.54%

13 Crowley County 1,660 126 7.59%

45 Otero County 5,057 561 11.09%

17 1 Adams County 84,058 11,999 14.27%

80 Broomfield County 11,111 1,274 11.47%

18 3 Arapahoe County 78,746 8,749 11.11%

18 Douglas County 39,935 3,670 9.19%

20 Elbert County 2,323 211 9.08%

37 Lincoln County 2,456 282 11.48%

70 Arapahoe Cty-Aurora 53 3 5.66%

71 Arapahoe Cty-Littleton 70 4 5.71%

19 62 Weld County 71,044 6,463 9.10%

20 7 Boulder County 37,533 3,814 10.16%

87 Boulder Cty-Longmont 8,445 1,213 14.36%

21 39 Mesa County 60,048 5,665 9.43%

6

Failure to Appear Rate for All Scheduled Events

District and Court Location

Total Held Scheduled Events Total Failure to Appear FTA Rate

22 17 Dolores County 453 60 13.25%

42 Montezuma County 9,065 1,147 12.65%

25 69 Denver County-Juvenile 6,009 150 2.50%

Summary 1,026,652 104,737 10.20%

7

Cases with a Held Hearing vs. Cases with a Held Hearing and an Opt-In

District and Court Location

Held Hearings in Districts

that Offer

Text Reminder Option

Total Cases with a Held

Hearing

and an Opt-In

% Cases with a Held

Hearing

and an Opt-In

1 Gilpin County 1,523 1,350 88.64%

Jefferson County 25,181 20,739 82.36%

2 Denver District 10,228 8,139 79.58%

3 Huerfano County 847 596 70.37%

Las Animas County 1,329 904 68.02%

4 El Paso County 49,287 41,424 84.05%

Teller County 2,127 1,754 82.46%

5 Clear Creek County 1,156 929 80.36%

Eagle County 3,086 2,648 85.81%

Eagle County - BASALT 204 108 52.94%

Lake County 620 414 66.77%

Summit County 2,518 2,323 92.26%

6 Archuleta County 984 820 83.33%

La Plata County 3,943 3,267 82.86%

San Juan County 62 57 91.94%

7 Delta County 2,172 1,770 81.49%

Gunnison County 1,066 896 84.05%

Hinsdale County 40 23 57.50%

Montrose County 3,201 2,642 82.54%

Montrose County-Nucla 239 187 78.24%

Ouray County 481 165 34.30%

San Miguel County 502 430 85.66%

8 Jackson County 132 112 84.85%

Larimer County 14,129 11,423 80.85%

Larimer County Court-

Loveland

4,328 3,534 81.65%

9 Garfield County 2,817 2,170 77.03%

Garfield County-Rifle 1,684 1,375 81.65%

Pitkin County 886 715 80.70%

Rio Blanco County 180 167 92.78%

Rio Blanco County,

Rangely

120 99 82.50%

10 Pueblo County 11,496 10,364 90.15%

11 Chaffee County 1,751 1,266 72.30%

Custer County 300 253 84.33%

8

Cases with a Held Hearing vs. Cases with a Held Hearing and an Opt-In

District and Court Location

Held Hearings in Districts

that Offer

Text Reminder Option

Total Cases with a Held

Hearing

and an Opt-In

% Cases with a Held

Hearing

and an Opt-In

11 Fremont County 3,365 2,542 75.54%

Park County 1,061 899 84.73%

12 Alamosa County 2,016 1,358 67.36%

Conejos County 500 333 66.60%

Costilla County 514 310 60.31%

Mineral County 101 63 62.38%

Rio Grande County 1,024 548 53.52%

Saguache County 458 226 49.34%

13 Kit Carson County 682 474 69.50%

Logan County 1,693 1,102 65.09%

Morgan County 2,667 1,868 70.04%

Phillips County 145 99 68.28%

Sedgwick County 150 107 71.33%

Washington County 256 185 72.27%

Yuma County 466 386 82.83%

14 Grand County 1,177 1,103 93.71%

Moffat County 1,467 1,164 79.35%

Routt County 1,453 1,332 91.67%

15 Baca County 248 144 58.06%

Cheyenne County 96 68 70.83%

Kiowa County 107 66 61.68%

Prowers County 1,301 849 65.26%

16 Bent County 463 273 58.96%

Crowley County 465 326 70.11%

Otero County 1,547 1,104 71.36%

17 Adams County 32,073 26,242 81.82%

Broomfield County 3,720 2,982 80.16%

18 Arapahoe County 23,680 19,659 83.02%

Arapahoe Cty-Aurora 33 0 0.00%

Arapahoe Cty-Littleton 41 40 97.56%

Douglas County 13,871 11,675 84.17%

Elbert County 1,012 627 61.96%

Lincoln County 800 634 79.25%

19 Weld County 19,716 16,797 85.19%

9

Cases with a Held Hearing vs. Cases with a Held Hearing and an Opt-In

District and Court Location

Held Hearings in Districts

that Offer

Text Reminder Option

Total Cases with a Held

Hearing

and an Opt-In

% Cases with a Held

Hearing

and an Opt-In

20 Boulder County 10,232 7,762 75.86%

Boulder Cty-Longmont 2,956 2,255 76.29%

21 Mesa County 13,800 9,932 71.97%

22 Dolores County 143 86 60.14%

Montezuma County 2,524 2,031 80.47%

25 Denver County-Juvenile 1,098 1,013 92.26%

Summary 297,740 241,727 81.19%

10

Total Opt Outs Recorded in the Case Management System

District and Court Location

Total Opt Outs

1 Gilpin County Blank 46

Prefer not answer 26

Jefferson County Blank 333

I don't want to receive texts 6

Incorrect Phone Number 177

Prefer not answer 273

Texts are too frequent 1

2 Denver District Blank 255

Incorrect Phone Number 72

3 Huerfano County Blank 21

I don't want to receive texts 1

Prefer not answer 54

Las Animas County Blank 22

I don't want to receive texts 1

Incorrect Phone Number 1

Prefer not answer 49

4 El Paso County Blank 896

I don't want to receive texts 15

Incorrect Phone Number 562

Prefer not answer 493

Texts are too frequent 1

Teller County Blank 38

Prefer not answer 13

5 Clear Creek County Blank 18

Incorrect Phone Number 8

Prefer not answer 17

Eagle County Blank 48

I don't want to receive texts 8

Incorrect Phone Number 7

Prefer not answer 79

Eagle County - BASALT Incorrect Phone Number 1

Lake County Blank 17

I don't want to receive texts 4

Incorrect Phone Number 3

Prefer not answer 2

11

Total Opt Outs Recorded in the Case Management System

District and Court Location

Total Opt Outs

5 Summit County Blank 78

I don't want to receive texts 1

Incorrect Phone Number 13

Prefer not answer 77

6 Archuleta County Blank 25

I don't want to receive texts 27

Prefer not answer 9

La Plata County Blank 65

Incorrect Phone Number 34

Prefer not answer 66

Texts are too frequent 1

San Juan County Prefer not answer 3

7 Delta County Blank 51

I don't want to receive texts 22

Incorrect Phone Number 25

Prefer not answer 45

Gunnison County Blank 16

Incorrect Phone Number 7

Prefer not answer 13

Hinsdale County Blank 1

Montrose County Blank 68

Prefer not answer 30

Montrose County-Nucla Blank 3

Prefer not answer 2

Ouray County Blank 3

I don't want to receive texts 2

San Miguel County Blank 6

I don't want to receive texts 8

Incorrect Phone Number 1

Prefer not answer 8

8 Jackson County Blank 3

Prefer not answer 2

Larimer County Blank 555

I don't want to receive texts 2

Incorrect Phone Number 15

12

Total Opt Outs Recorded in the Case Management System

District and Court Location

Total Opt Outs

8 Larimer County Prefer not answer 191

Larimer County Court-Loveland Blank 152

Incorrect Phone Number 6

Prefer not answer 3

9 Garfield County Blank 86

Incorrect Phone Number 10

Prefer not answer 19

Texts are too frequent 1

Garfield County-Rifle Blank 58

I don't want to receive texts 5

Incorrect Phone Number 5

Prefer not answer 15

Pitkin County Blank 27

Prefer not answer 11

Rio Blanco County Blank 7

I don't want to receive texts 3

Prefer not answer 10

Rio Blanco County, Rangely Blank 2

Prefer not answer 1

10 Pueblo County Blank 221

Incorrect Phone Number 81

Prefer not answer 125

11 Chaffee County Blank 37

I don't want to receive texts 11

Incorrect Phone Number 3

Prefer not answer 20

Custer County Blank 7

Incorrect Phone Number 2

Prefer not answer 4

Fremont County Blank 61

Prefer not answer 36

Park County Blank 25

I don't want to receive texts 8

Incorrect Phone Number 1

Prefer not answer 17

13

Total Opt Outs Recorded in the Case Management System

District and Court Location

Total Opt Outs

12 Alamosa County Blank 19

I don't want to receive texts 3

Incorrect Phone Number 9

Prefer not answer 30

Conejos County Blank 7

Prefer not answer 1

Costilla County Blank 6

Incorrect Phone Number 4

Prefer not answer 7

Mineral County Blank 1

Prefer not answer 1

Rio Grande County Blank 15

I don't want to receive texts 1

Incorrect Phone Number 8

Prefer not answer 21

Saguache County Blank 8

I don't want to receive texts 1

Incorrect Phone Number 2

Prefer not answer 8

13 Kit Carson County Blank 9

I don't want to receive texts 1

Incorrect Phone Number 7

Prefer not answer 4

Logan County Blank 35

I don't want to receive texts 1

Incorrect Phone Number 11

Prefer not answer 13

Morgan County Blank 25

Incorrect Phone Number 9

Prefer not answer 37

Phillips County Prefer not answer 1

Sedgwick County Blank 3

Incorrect Phone Number 6

Prefer not answer 3

Washington County Blank 7

14

Total Opt Outs Recorded in the Case Management System

District and Court Location

Total Opt Outs

13 Washington County I don't want to receive texts 4

Prefer not answer 10

Yuma County Blank 14

I don't want to receive texts 4

Prefer not answer 11

14 Grand County Blank 45

Prefer not answer 25

Moffat County Blank 65

Incorrect Phone Number 4

Prefer not answer 19

Routt County Blank 59

Prefer not answer 14

15 Baca County Blank 7

I don't want to receive texts 4

Incorrect Phone Number 1

Prefer not answer 4

Cheyenne County Blank 1

I don't want to receive texts 2

Incorrect Phone Number 1

Prefer not answer 1

Kiowa County Blank 2

I don't want to receive texts 1

Prefer not answer 1

Prowers County Blank 49

I don't want to receive texts 2

Incorrect Phone Number 17

Prefer not answer 38

16 Bent County Blank 8

Incorrect Phone Number 4

Prefer not answer 8

Crowley County Blank 7

I don't want to receive texts 5

Incorrect Phone Number 8

Prefer not answer 7

Otero County Blank 33

15

Total Opt Outs Recorded in the Case Management System

District and Court Location

Total Opt Outs

16 Otero County I don't want to receive texts 3

Incorrect Phone Number 18

Prefer not answer 30

17 Adams County Blank 1,134

I don't want to receive texts 2

Incorrect Phone Number 46

Prefer not answer 282

Texts are too frequent 1

Broomfield County Blank 128

I don't want to receive texts 1

Incorrect Phone Number 10

Prefer not answer 32

18 Arapahoe County Blank 938

I don't want to receive texts 4

Incorrect Phone Number 13

Prefer not answer 247

Arapahoe Cty-Littleton Blank 16

Douglas County Blank 142

I don't want to receive texts 6

Incorrect Phone Number 29

Prefer not answer 160

Elbert County Blank 6

I don't want to receive texts 1

Incorrect Phone Number 5

Prefer not answer 4

Lincoln County Blank 24

I don't want to receive texts 4

Prefer not answer 15

19 Weld County Blank 1,078

I don't want to receive texts 13

Incorrect Phone Number 16

Prefer not answer 165

20 Boulder County Blank 205

Incorrect Phone Number 4

Prefer not answer 63

16

Total Opt Outs Recorded in the Case Management System

District and Court Location

Total Opt Outs

20 Boulder Cty-Longmont Blank 53

Prefer not answer 32

21 Mesa County Blank 598

I don't want to receive texts 20

Incorrect Phone Number 33

Prefer not answer 101

22 Dolores County Blank 5

Prefer not answer 4

Montezuma County Blank 128

Incorrect Phone Number 3

Prefer not answer 40

25 Denver County-Juvenile Blank 12

Incorrect Phone Number 7

Prefer not answer 4

Total 12,820

17

Colorado Judicial Branch

Extreme Risk Protection Orders

HB19-1177

Reporting Period: between Jul 1, 2022 and Jun 30, 2023

Table of Contents

Report Information

3

Total Cases Filed

5

Total Petitions Filed

7

Total Orders Issued or Denied

9

Total Orders Terminated

11

Total Orders Renewed

13

New Criminal Case Filed 30 Days After Extreme Risk or Temporary Extreme Risk Granted

15

Report Information

3

Report Information

Defintions

Total Cases Filed

This is the total unique case numbers that had a petition for temporary extreme risk or a petition for extreme risk

protection order filed.

Total Petitions Filed

This is the total number of petitions for a temporary extreme risk or extreme risk protection order. This is only for the

first petition filed into the case, meaning if the petitioner files a petition for temporary extreme risk and then files an

extreme risk petition in the same case, this would only be counted under the temporary petition for extreme risk since

that was the first petition in the case.

Total Orders Issued and Denied

This is the total number of cases with an order for temporary extreme risk or extreme risk protection order that was

issued or denied. Please note a case may have both a temporary and an extreme risk order issued/denied at separate

times on the case. Therefore a case may be counted under each category.

Special Note: A petitioner may petition for an extreme risk order, but the Judicial Officer may decide to issue a

temporary extreme risk order. The petitioner may petition for a temporary extreme risk order, but the Judicial Officer

does not grant or deny that request at the initial hearing. The Judicial Officer does determine an extreme risk hearing

should happen. At the extreme risk hearing an extreme risk protection order is granted (and a temporary order was

never granted on this case). A case may also have a temporary extreme risk order granted and later have the extreme

risk order granted in the case. This may cause the petition numbers to not align with the order numbers.

Total Orders Terminated

This is the total number of cases with an order for temporary extreme risk or extreme risk protection order that were

vacated. A case may have a temporary and an extreme risk order vacated.

Total Orders Renewed

This is the total number of cases with an extreme risk protection order that was renewed.

New Criminal Case Filed 30 Days After Extreme Risk or Temporary Extreme Risk Granted

This displays any temporary extreme risk or extreme risk protection order case where within 30 days of issuance of the

order a new criminal case was filed. The 30 days is based on the offense date for the criminal case. If a case has been

sealed or suppressed it will not be included in the list.

Special Note: The data has been matched based on Last Name, First Name and Date of Birth. It is a possibility that

due to this matching that some cases may not be displayed or display due to another person in the state having the

same Last Name, First Name and Date of Birth. Please note the state court administrator does not know if the new

criminal case was filed due to the temporary extreme risk or extreme risk protection order case.

Report Date: Nov 21, 2023

4

Total Cases Filed

Case File Date Range: between Jul 1, 2022 and Jun 30, 2023

5

Total Cases Filed

District and Court Location

Total Cases Filed

1 Jefferson County 8

2 Denver County-Probate 59

3 Huerfano County 1

4 El Paso County 21

5 Eagle County 2

Lake County 1

6 Archuleta County 1

La Plata County 8

7 Montrose County 1

8 Larimer County 9

9 Pitkin County 2

10 Pueblo County 2

11 Fremont County 1

12 Costilla County 1

Rio Grande County 1

13 Logan County 1

Morgan County 1

Phillips County 2

14 Grand County 1

Moffat County 1

17 Adams County 5

Broomfield County 4

18 Arapahoe County 15

Arapahoe Cty-Littleton 1

Douglas County 8

19 Weld County 6

20 Boulder County 8

Boulder Cty-Longmont 1

21 Mesa County 1

22 Montezuma County 1

Summary 174

6

Total Petitions Filed

Case File Date Range: between Jul 1, 2022 and Jun 30, 2023

7

Total Petitions Filed

District and Court Location

Petition for Extreme Risk Petition for Temporary Extreme Risk

1 Jefferson County 8

2 Denver County-Probate 2 57

3 Huerfano County 1

4 El Paso County 3 18

5 Eagle County 1 1

Lake County 1

6 Archuleta County 1

La Plata County 1 7

7 Montrose County 1

8 Larimer County 1 8

9 Pitkin County 2

10 Pueblo County 2

11 Fremont County 1

12 Costilla County 1

Rio Grande County 1

13 Logan County 1

Morgan County 1

Phillips County 2

14 Grand County 1

Moffat County 1

17 Adams County 5

Broomfield County 1 3

18 Arapahoe County 3 12

Arapahoe Cty-Littleton 1

Douglas County 3 5

19 Weld County 2 4

20 Boulder County 8

Boulder Cty-Longmont 1

21 Mesa County 1

22 Montezuma County 1

Total 19 155

8

Total Orders Issued or Denied

Case File Date Range: between Jul 1, 2022 and Jun 30, 2023

9

Total Orders Issued or Denied

District and Court Location

Extreme Risk Temporary Extreme Risk

Denied Issued Total Denied Issued Total

1 Jefferson County 5

5

2 6

8

2 Denver County-Probate 3 50

53

57

3 Huerfano County 1

1

4 El Paso County 3 9

12

7 8

15

5 Eagle County 1

1

2

Lake County 1

1

6 Archuleta County 1

1

La Plata County 2 4

6

2 6

8

7 Montrose County 1

1

8 Larimer County 1 3

4

3 5

8

9 Pitkin County 1

1

10 Pueblo County 1 1

2

11 Fremont County 1

1

12 Costilla County 1

1

Rio Grande County 1

1

13 Logan County 1

1

Morgan County 1

1

Phillips County 1

1

2

14 Grand County 1

1

Moffat County 1

1

17 Adams County 4

4

1 4

5

Broomfield County 4

4

18 Arapahoe County 2 6

8

6 6

12

Douglas County 1 7

8

5

19 Weld County 4

4

1 4

5

20 Boulder County 6

6

7

Boulder Cty-Longmont 1

1

21 Mesa County 1

1

22 Montezuma County 1

1

Summary 16 108 124 27 128 155

A petitioner may petition for an extreme risk order, but the Judicial Officer may decide to issue a temporary extreme risk order. The

petitioner may petition for a temporary extreme risk order, but the Judicial Officer does not grant or deny that request at the initial

hearing. The Judicial Officer does determine an extreme risk hearing should occur and the court schedules this hearing. At the

extreme risk hearing an extreme risk protection order is granted (a temporary order is never granted on this case). A case may also

have a temporary extreme risk order granted and later have the extreme risk order granted in the case. This may cause the petition

numbers to not align with the order numbers.

10

Total Orders Terminated

Case File Date Range: between Jul 1, 2022 and Jun 30, 2023

11

Total Orders Terminated

District and Court Location

Extreme Risk Temporary Extreme Risk

1 Jefferson County 1 6

2 Denver County-Probate 19 56

3 Huerfano County 1 1

4 El Paso County 3 8

5 Eagle County 2

Lake County 1

6 La Plata County 6

7 Montrose County 1

8 Larimer County 5

9 Pitkin County 1 1

10 Pueblo County 1

11 Fremont County 1

12 Rio Grande County 1

13 Logan County 1

Phillips County 1 2

14 Grand County 1 1

Moffat County 1

17 Adams County 1 4

Broomfield County 1 4

18 Arapahoe County 3 6

Douglas County 2 5

19 Weld County 1 4

20 Boulder County 6 7

Boulder Cty-Longmont 1

22 Montezuma County 1

Total 41 127

12

Total Orders Renewed

Case File Date Range: between Jul 1, 2022 and Jun 30, 2023

13

Total Orders Renewed

District and Court Location

Total Orders Renewed

2 Denver County-Probate 1

Summary --

14

New Criminal Case Filed 30 Days After Extreme Risk or

Temporary Extreme Risk Granted

Case File Date Range: between Jul 1, 2022 and Jun 30, 2023

15

New Criminal Case(s) Filed 30 Days After Extreme Risk or Temporary Extreme Risk Granted

District Court

Location

Extreme Risk Case

Number

New

Crime

District

New Crime

Court

Location

New Crime Case

Number

Charge

Count

Law Number Law

Class

Law

Description

Finding

Description

1 Jefferson

County

D0302023CV000014 1 Jefferson

County

C0302023M 000165 1 18-3-206 M1 MENACING

2 18-9-111(1)(e) M2 HARASSMENT-

TELEPHONE-

THREAT/

OBSCENE

3 18-8-104(1)(a) M2 OBSTRUCTING

A PEACE

OFFICER

4 18-8-103 M2 RESISTING

ARREST

5 18-9-119(2) M2 FAILURE TO

LEAVE

PREMISES

2 Denver

County-

Probate

D0682023CV030017 1 Jefferson

County

C0302023M 002503 1 42-4-1301(1)

(a)

M DRIVING

UNDER THE

INFLUENCE

2 18-8-104(1)(a) M2 OBSTRUCTING

A PEACE

OFFICER

4 El Paso

County

D0212022CV000273 4 El Paso

County

C0212022M 004939 1 18-4-506 M2 TAMPERING 2 Dism by DA

2 18-4-501(1),(4)

(a)

PO CRIMINAL

MISCHIEF-

UNDER $300

Dism by DA

5 Eagle

County

D0192023CV000007 5 Eagle

County

C0192023M 000320 1 18-9-111(1)(a) M1 HARASSMENT-

STRIKE/

SHOVE/KICK

2 18-4-506 M2 TAMPERING 2

D0192023CV030100 18 Arapahoe

County

C0032023M 002181 1 18-9-111(1)(e) M2 HARASSMENT-

TELEPHONE-

THREAT/

OBSCENE

16

New Criminal Case(s) Filed 30 Days After Extreme Risk or Temporary Extreme Risk Granted

District Court

Location

Extreme Risk Case

Number

New

Crime

District

New Crime

Court

Location

New Crime Case

Number

Charge

Count

Law Number Law

Class

Law

Description

Finding

Description

5 Lake

County

D0332023CV000005 5 Lake

County

C0332023M 000046 1 18-6-803.5(1)

(a)

M1 VIOLATION

P/O-CRIMINAL

2 18-6-803.5(1)

(a)

M1 VIOLATION

P/O-CRIMINAL

3 18-6-803.5(1)

(a)

M1 VIOLATION

P/O-CRIMINAL

4 18-6-803.5(1)

(a)

M1 VIOLATION

P/O-CRIMINAL

5 18-6-803.5(1)

(a)

M1 VIOLATION

P/O-CRIMINAL

6 18-6-803.5(1)

(a)

M1 VIOLATION

P/O-CRIMINAL

7 18-6-803.5(1)

(a)

M1 VIOLATION

P/O-CRIMINAL

8 18-6-803.5(1)

(a)

M1 VIOLATION

P/O-CRIMINAL

9 18-12-102(4) M1 ILLEGAL

WEAPON-

POSSESSION

10 18-18-403.5(1),

(2)(c)

DM1 CONTROLLED

SUB-POSS

SCH I/II/III/IV/V

17 Adams

County

D0012023CV000078 17 Adams

County

C0012023M 002623 1 18-6-803.5(1)

(a)

M2 VIOLATION

P/O-CIVIL

Dismissed

by Plea

2 18-6-803.5(1)

(a)

M2 VIOLATION

P/O-CIVIL-ATT

Guilty

D0012023CR002005 1 18-4-203(1),(2)

(b)(I)

F3 BURGLARY 2-

OF DWELLING

2 18-6-803.5(1)

(a)

M1 VIOLATION

P/O-CRIMINAL

17

New Criminal Case(s) Filed 30 Days After Extreme Risk or Temporary Extreme Risk Granted

District Court

Location

Extreme Risk Case

Number

New

Crime

District

New Crime

Court

Location

New Crime Case

Number

Charge

Count

Law Number Law

Class

Law

Description

Finding

Description

17 Adams

County

D0012023CV000078 17 Adams

County

D0012023CR002005 3 18-6-803.5(1)

(a)

M2 VIOLATION

P/O-CIVIL

19 Weld

County

D0622023CV000018 19 Weld

County

C0622023M 000833 1 18-12-106(1)

(b)

M1 WEAPON-

PROHIBITED

USE-

RECKLESS

W/GUN

Dism by DA

2 18-9-106(1)(f) M2 DISORDERLY

CONDUCT-

DISPLAY

REAL/SIMUL

WE

Dfrd

Sentence

20 Boulder

County

C0072022C 032332 20 Boulder

County

C0072022M 001832 1 18-6-803.5(1)

(a)

M1 VIOLATION

P/O-CRIMINAL

Dism by DA

2 13-14.5-111 M2 EXTREME

RISK

PROTECT

ORDER-

VIOLATE-ATT

Guilty

3 13-14.5-111 M2 EXTREME

RISK

PROTECT

ORDER-

VIOLATE-ATT

Dism by DA

C0072022M 001865 1 42-4-1301(1)

(a)

M DRIVING

UNDER THE

INFLUENCE

Guilty

2 18-6-803.5(1)

(a)

M1 VIOLATION

P/O-CRIMINAL

Dism by DA

3 42-4-1401 T2 RECKLESS

DRIVING

Dism by DA

18

New Criminal Case(s) Filed 30 Days After Extreme Risk or Temporary Extreme Risk Granted

District Court

Location

Extreme Risk Case

Number

New

Crime

District

New Crime

Court

Location

New Crime Case

Number

Charge

Count

Law Number Law

Class

Law

Description

Finding

Description

20 Boulder

County

C0072022C 032332 20 Boulder

County

C0072022M 001865 4 42-4-1409(1) T1 NO

INSURANCE-

OWNER

Dism by DA

5 42-4-1305 TIA ALCOHOL-

OPEN

CONTAINER/

DRINK IN

VEHICLE

Dism by DA

22 Montezuma

County

D0422023CV000002 22 Montezuma

County

C0422023M 000055 1 18-3-206 M1 MENACING

19