Scotland02.PDF

Grounds for Divorce and Maintenance Between Former Spouses

GROUNDS FOR DIVORCE AND MAINTENANCE BETWEEN

FORMER SPOUSES

SCOTLAND

Professor Michael Meston

Department of Private Law, University of Aberdeen

October 2002

A. GENERAL

1. What is the current source of law for divorce?

The Divorce (Scotland) Act 1976 (c.39)

2. Give a brief history of the main developments of your divorce law.

There was no divorce a vinculo in Scotland until the religious

Reformation, which occurred in 1560. From that date the courts began

to grant divorces for adultery at common law, basing themselves on

Biblical texts. In 1573, desertion became a ground of divorce by

statute.

In 1938 the Divorce (Scotland) Act added cruelty, incurable

insanity, sodomy and bestiality. The whole law was reformed and

restated in the Divorce (Scotland) Act 1976, which purported to

abolish all previous grounds of divorce and to replace them with the

single ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage. However it also

provided that irretrievable breakdown could be established only by

proving one of five sets of circumstances, which for practical purposes

are treated as separate grounds of divorce. These are adultery,

intolerable behaviour, desertion, two years’ non-cohabitation plus the

defender’s consent, and five years’ non-cohabitation even without that

consent. Effectively this added two ‘separation’ grounds to the three

fault-based grounds.

3. Have there been proposals to reform your current divorce law?

1573 c.55.

Scotland

Yes. Consultation by the Scottish Law Commission has revealed

considerable dissatisfaction with the present grounds of divorce,

principally because of the length of the periods of separation required,

which has led to what can be regarded as abuse of the fault grounds.

The Commission recommended a reduction of the separation periods

to one year and two years (instead of two and five years) but this has

not yet been implemented. More radical proposals are being

considered, including a single ground consisting of one year’s

separation and divorce on demand after a short waiting period.

B. GROUNDS FOR DIVORCE

I. General

4. What are the grounds for divorce?

The 1976 Act provides that the court may grant decree of divorce if,

but only if, it is established in accordance with the provisions of the

Act that the marriage has broken down irretrievably. These provisions

are;

(a) since the date of the marriage the defender has committed

adultery

(b) since the date of the marriage the defender has at any time

behaved ….in such a way that the pursuer cannot reasonably

be expected to cohabit with the defender

deserted the pursuer for a continuous period of two years,

during which there has been no cohabitation and the pursuer

has not refused a genuine offer by the defender to adhere.

(d) no cohabitation for a continuous period of two years

immediately preceding the raising of the action and the

defender consents to granting the divorce

(e) no cohabitation for a continuous period of five years

immediately before the raising of the action.

5. Provide the most recent statistics on the different bases for which divorce

was granted.

No answer.

Grounds for Divorce and Maintenance Between Former Spouses

6. How frequently are divorce applications refused?

The courts have no discretion to refuse to grant a decree of divorce in

the absence of a valid defence or a failure by the pursuer to aver facts

amounting to one of the grounds of divorce.

7. Is divorce obtained through a judicial process, or is there also an

administrative procedure?

All divorces are obtained in a judicial process, either in the local Sheriff

Courts or in the Court of Session in Edinburgh.

8. Does a specific competent authority have jurisdiction over divorce

proceedings?

As above the courts have the sole jurisdiction.

9. How are divorce proceedings initiated? (e.g. Is a special form required?

Do you need a lawyer? Can the individual go to the competent authority

personally?)

The fault based grounds will be raised in the form of a normal civil

action, requiring the services of a lawyer. A simplified procedure

exists for either of the separation grounds. Under this procedure the

applicant can complete a form obtained from the clerk of court, return

it with a sworn affidavit and appropriate documents, and the other

spouse’s signature of consent when the ground is two years’

separation. This procedure can be used only if there are no children of

the marriage under the age of 16 years, neither party seeks any order

for financial provision and neither suffers from mental disorder.

10. When does the divorce finally dissolve the marriage?

The marriage is dissolved immediately the court decree has been

granted, but is suspended if an appeal against the decision is lodged

within the appropriate short periods for appeal.

If under your system the sole ground for divorce is the irretrievable

breakdown of marriage answer part II only. If not, answer part III only.

Scotland

III. Multiple grounds for divorce

Although Scots law purports to make irretrievable breakdown the

only ground for divorce, breakdown can be established only by

demonstrating one of five grounds. This report proceeds on the basis

of multiple grounds and continues with Part III.

1. Divorce by consent

22. Does divorce by consent exist as an autonomous ground for divorce, or is

it based on the ground of irretrievable breakdown?

There is no separate ground of divorce by consent. Consent is relevant

only in the case of irretrievable breakdown established by separation

for two years, which requires the consent of both spouses.

23. Do both spouses need to apply for a divorce together, and if not, how do

the divorce proceedings vary according to whether one or both spouses

apply for a divorce?

In a case based on separation for two years, one spouse will apply to

the court (usually on the simplified form) and the other will sign to

demonstrate consent. There is no formal basis for both spouses to

apply for a divorce together.

24. Is a period of separation required before filing the divorce papers?

The only ground in which consent is relevant is separation for two

years.

25. Is it necessary that the marriage was of a certain duration?

The marriage must obviously have lasted for at least two years before

there can have been separation for that period.

26. Is a minimum age of the spouses required?

Grounds for Divorce and Maintenance Between Former Spouses

There is no minimum age for divorce, but the minimum age for

marriage is 16, with the result that 18 is the minimum age for consent

after two years’ separation.

27. Are attempts at conciliation, information meetings or mediation attempts

required?

There is no automatic requirement for mediation. There is however

provision for mediation by accredited mediators. With limited

exceptions, no evidence of what occurred in family mediation is

admissible in civil proceedings. If children are involved, the court may

refer the case to family mediators.

28. What (formal) procedure is required? (e.g. How many times do the

spouses need to appear before the competent authority?)

In divorces based on two years’ separation with consent where the

simplified form is available, there will be no need for the spouses to

appear before the court at all. If there are financial claims which have

not been agreed or if young children exist, the procedure will be a

normal court action, at which the spouses would normally appear only

at the hearing of evidence.

29. Do the spouses need to reach an agreement or to make a proposal, or may

the competent authority determine the consequences of the divorce?

If the simplified form is used, the court will be informed that there are

no financial claims to be decided and will do nothing other than grant

the divorce. If there is consent to divorce after two year’s separation,

but the financial arrangements are disputed, the court will have to

determine the consequences of the divorce after hearing evidence.

30. If they need to reach an agreement, does it need to be exhaustive or is a

partial agreement sufficient? On what subjects should it be, and when

should this agreement be reached?

Not applicable.

Scotland

31. To what extent must the competent authority scrutinize the reached

agreement?

When consent is relevant, the court will confine itself to ensuring that

the evidence that the consent is genuine is examined.

32. Is it possible to convert divorce proceedings, initiated on another ground,

to proceedings on the ground of mutual consent, or must new proceedings

be commenced? Or, vice versa, is it possible to convert divorce

proceedings on the ground of mutual consent, to proceedings based on

other grounds?

If there has in fact been separation for the appropriate period, it would

be possible to convert proceedings based on, say, adultery, into an

action based on two years’ separation with consent of both parties.

This does fairly often happen in a contested divorce when the parties

reach some agreement, usually over finance or the custody of children.

The converse would also be possible.

2. Divorce on the ground of fault/ matrimonial offence

33. What are the fault grounds for divorce?

Adultery. Intolerable behaviour. Desertion for two years.

34. If adultery is a ground what behaviour does it constitute?

Voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and a person

of the opposite sex, who is not the marriage partner. This does not

include artificial insemination with the semen of a man other than the

husband, even if the husband does not consent (although this might

amount to intolerable behaviour). There must be penetration of the

vagina by the penis, but ejaculation is not required.

A woman who has been raped does not commit adultery, but there is

doubt whether it would be a good defence if she was so drunk or

stupefied as to be incapable of consent, especially if the drunkenness

was voluntary. It does however amount to adultery if there is sexual

intercourse with a third party even if there is a genuine belief that the

other spouse is dead or that a divorce has occurred.

Grounds for Divorce and Maintenance Between Former Spouses

35. In what circumstances can injury or false accusation provide a ground

for divorce?

This could give rise to divorce on the ground of irretrievable

breakdown established by intolerable behaviour, of which the

statutory definition is,

since the date of the marriage the defender has at any time

behaved (whether or not as a result of mental abnormality and

whether such behaviour has been active or passive) in such a way

that the pursuer cannot reasonably be expected to cohabit with the

defender.

36. Is an intentional fault required?

Intentional fault is not necessarily required. There can be adultery in

the good faith belief that the marriage no longer exists. The intolerable

behaviour ground can be established even although the defender is

mentally abnormal. However the normal situation does involve

intentional fault.

37. Should the fault be offensive to the other spouse? Does the prior fault of

one spouse, deprive the guilty / fault-based nature of the shortcomings of

the other?

The mere fact that divorce proceedings have begun indicates that the

fault is offensive to the other spouse, but this is particularly obvious in

the behaviour ground, which concentrates on the effect of the

behaviour on the other spouse. It must be such as to make it

unreasonable to expect that spouse to continue to cohabit with the

defender.

38. To obtain a divorce, is it necessary that the marriage was of a certain

duration?

There is no minimum duration of the marriage.

Scotland

39. Does the parties' reconciliation prevent the innocent spouse from relying

upon earlier facts as a ground for divorce?

Section 1(3) of the Divorce (Scotland) Act 1976 provides that adultery

is condoned, and thus cannot thereafter be used to establish

irretrievable breakdown, if the pursuer has cohabited with the

defender in the knowledge or belief that the defender has committed

the adultery. There is however a three month period of grace in which

cohabitation in an attempted reconciliation will not amount to

condonation. This is designed to avoid deterring the other spouse from

attempting reconciliation. There is a similar period of three months’

grace so that attempted reconciliation after desertion will not interrupt

the running of the two year period.

40. How is the fault proved?

If the fault is disputed, proof will be by evidence led in the appropriate

court as in a normal civil action. It is however not uncommon for the

fault (adultery, intolerable behaviour or desertion) to be admitted, and

further proof would not be required. In such cases the dispute may be

over financial arrangements.

41. Are attempts at conciliation, information meetings or mediation attempts

required?

The position is the same as in Question 27 relating to consent.

42. Can the divorce application be rejected or postponed due to the fact that

the dissolution of the marriage would result in grave financial or moral

hardship to one spouse or the children? If so, may the competent authority

invoke this on its own motion?

When the divorce action is solely on the basis of separation for five

years, without the consent of the other spouse, the court has a

discretion not to grant decree if the result of the decree would be grave

financial hardship for the defender. This hardship can include the loss

of the chance of acquiring any benefit. It can be doubted whether this

discretionary bar to divorce is necessary in Scotland, given that

accrued pension rights are treated in Scotland (unlike England) as a

form of savings taken into account in assessing fair division of assets.

Grounds for Divorce and Maintenance Between Former Spouses

If there are children of the marriage aged under 16, the Children

(Scotland) Act 1995 (section 12) requires the court to consider the

arrangements proposed to be made for the upbringing of the child in

determining whether to exercise specific powers to determine matters

relating to the child’s welfare, but has no power to insist on being

satisfied about the arrangements before granting the divorce.

43. Is it possible to pronounce a judgment against both parties, even if there

was no counterclaim by the respondent?

No.

3. Divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of the marriage

and/or separation

44. How is irretrievable breakdown established? Are there presumptions of

irretrievable breakdown?

Breakdown can at the moment be established only by proving one of

the five grounds of divorce. See Question 4.

45. Can one truly speak of a non-fault-based divorce or is the idea of fault

still of some relevance?

Three of the situations (adultery, intolerable behaviour and desertion)

which establish irretrievable breakdown are in fact fault-based

grounds of divorce.

46. To obtain the divorce, is it necessary that the marriage was of a certain

duration?

No. Although desertion must be for two years, and the separation

grounds involve either two or five years’ separation.

47. How long must the separation last before divorce is possible?

Two years if the other spouse consents or five years if there is no

consent.

Scotland

48. Does this separation suffice as evidence of the irretrievable breakdown?

Yes.

49. In so far as separation is relied upon to prove irretrievable breakdown,

(a) Which circumstances suspend the term of separation?

In determining whether cohabitation has been continuous for the two

or five years required, no account is taken of any period or periods not

exceeding a total of six months during which the parties cohabited

with each other. Such cohabitation does not interrupt the running of

the periods, but also does not count as part of the separation. Any

other cohabitation will require the period of separation to begin again.

(b) Does the separation need to be intentional?

In England it has been held that spouses are not living apart unless at

least one of them has decided that the marriage is at an end. This

appears not to be true in Scotland. The wording of the relevant

statutes is different and section 13(2) of the Divorce (Scotland) Act

1976 defines cohabitation as existing only when the spouses are ‘in fact

living together as man and wife’. Thus it is thought that if one is in

prison for the requisite period, the separation would be such as to

amount to irretrievable breakdown and thus to permit divorce. It

appears therefore that the separation does not in Scotland require to be

intentional.

It is not necessary to have separate homes, as there can still be

separation while living under the same roof. This may be difficult to

distinguish from living together on bad terms, but if the spouses live

what are in fact separate lives under the same roof, this can qualify as

separation for the purposes of divorce.

50. Are attempts at conciliation, information meetings or mediation attempts

required?

Grounds for Divorce and Maintenance Between Former Spouses

No. See Question 27.

51. Is a period for reflection and consideration required?

No.

52. Do the spouses need to reach an agreement or to make a proposal on

certain subjects? If so, when should this agreement be reached? If not,

may the competent authority determine the consequences of the divorce?

No. See Question 29.

53. To what extent must the competent authority scrutinize the reached

agreement?

As in Question 31.

54. Can the divorce application be rejected or postponed due to the fact that

the dissolution of the marriage would result in grave financial or moral

hardship to one spouse or the children? If so, can the competent authority

invoke this on its own motion?

No. Although desertion must be for two years, and the separation

grounds involve either two or five years’ separation.

C. SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE AFTER DIVORCE

I. General

55. What is the current source of private law for maintenance of spouses after

divorce?

The Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985 (c.37).

56. Give a brief history of the main developments of your private law

regarding maintenance of spouses after divorce.

From the introduction of divorce in 1560 until the Succession

(Scotland) Act 1964 came into force on 10but September 1964 (apart

Scotland

from cases based on incurable insanity) the innocent spouse

immediately became entitled to the legal rights of jus relictae, terce and

courtesy and any marriage contract provisions as if the other spouse

had died at the date of the court decree. Terce and courtesy were

income rights, but of little practical importance in most cases.

Otherwise there was provision only for a capital payment. The 1964

Act gave the court a discretionary power to award a periodical

allowance or a capital sum or both to the pursuer, having regard to the

means of the parties and ‘all the circumstances of the case’. The

Divorce (Scotland) Act 1976 continued the same system, but enabled

the court to make an award of financial provision to either spouse.

This proved to be too vague and unpredictable, and after detailed

consultation by the Scottish Law Commission the Family Law

(Scotland) Act 1985 introduced the present position. This permits

orders for payment of a capital sum, for transfer of property, for a

periodical allowance, for sharing in pension benefits, and also

incidental orders such as occupancy of the matrimonial home etc.

Principles for the exercise of the discretion (e.g. equal sharing of

matrimonial property) are set out in section 9 of the Act and the order

must be reasonable having regard to the resources of the parties.

57. Have there been proposals to reform your current private law regarding

maintenance of spouses after divorce?

There are no current proposals to alter the law relating to

maintenance.

58. Upon divorce, does the law grant maintenance to the former spouse?

Divorce terminates the obligation of support between spouses, but the

court has the power to make orders for payment of a capital sum, for

transfer of property from one to the other, for a periodical allowance

although only for a limited period, for division of pension benefits and

various ancillary orders. Obviously, there are numerous cases in which

the assets are so low that there is no point in making any order for

financial provision. Any order, even if the divorce is not defended,

must conform to the principles set out in section 9 of the Family Law

(Scotland) Act 1985.

Grounds for Divorce and Maintenance Between Former Spouses

The principles in section 9 are (a) that the net value of the matrimonial

property (defined in the Act as a form of deferred community of

acquests) should be shared fairly ( which normally means equally)

between the parties (b)that fair account should be taken of any

economic advantage derived by either spouse from contributions by

the other and conversely of any economic disadvantage suffered by

either in the interests of the family (c) that any economic burden of

caring after divorce for a child of the marriage under 16 should be

shared fairly (d) that a party who has been dependent to a substantial

degree on the financial support of the other party should be awarded

such financial provision as is reasonable to enable him or her to adjust,

over a period of not more than three years from the divorce, to the loss

of that support and (e) that reasonable financial provision for a

reasonable period should be awarded to a spouse likely to suffer

serious financial hardship.

Continuing maintenance can be provided only by a periodical

allowance, and it will be noted that (d) above permits continuing

periodical allowance for a maximum period of three years as an

adjustment allowance. The primary purpose of the financial provisions

on divorce is to achieve a clean break and to reduce the opportunities

for continuing friction and disputes over non-payment or delayed

payment of maintenance. In the normal case, there will be no

continuing maintenance payments and any that are awarded will

expire at latest after the three years have elapsed. The court is directed

to have regard to the age, health and earning capacity of the party who

is claiming the financial provision, the duration and extent of the

dependence of that party prior to the divorce, any intention of that

party to undertake a course of education or training, the needs and

resources of the parties, and all the other circumstances of the case.

In the case of serious financial hardship (category (e) above), the

hardship is assessed at the time of the divorce and is expressly

designed not to continue a general obligation of maintenance, but it

can be awarded for a period after the three years adjustment period.

59. Are the rules relating to maintenance upon divorce connected with the

rules relating to other post-marital financial consequences, especially to

Scotland

the rules of matrimonial property law? To what extent do the rules of

(matrimonial) property law fulfil a function of support?

The remainder of the questionnaire is of little relevance in Scotland, as

there will rarely be continuing maintenance payments, and then only

for a limited period.

There is no formal matrimonial property law and it is intended that

the settlement on divorce should constitute the whole financial

arrangements between the former spouses. It is common for the

matrimonial home to be owned by both spouses, but fair division of

the matrimonial assets acquired between the date of the marriage and

the final separation will often mean that the house is sold and the

proceeds divided. There will normally be no regular maintenance

payments, other than any made during the limited periods referred to

as (d) and (e) in Question 58, or payments in respect of the

maintenance of children of the marriage.

60. Do provisions on the distribution of property or pension rights

(including social security expectancies where relevant) have an influence

on maintenance after divorce?

Property and pension rights etc. are all taken into account in the

settlement on divorce. They have no further significance for

maintenance thereafter. Periodical allowances may not be used to give

effect to the principle of sharing the value of matrimonial property.

61. Can compensation (damages) for the divorced spouse be claimed in

addition to or instead of maintenance payments? Does maintenance also

have the function of compensation?

No.

62. Is there only one type of maintenance claim after divorce or are there,

according to the type of divorce (e.g. fault, breakdown), several claims of a

different nature? If there are different claims explain their bases and

extent.

The type of divorce has no effect on subsequent maintenance.

Grounds for Divorce and Maintenance Between Former Spouses

63. Are the divorced spouses obliged to provide information to each other

spouse and/or to the competent authority on their income and assets? Is

this right to information enforceable? What are the consequences of a

spouse's refusal to provide such information?

In the settlement at divorce, both spouses are required to provide full

information about their assets. If continuing maintenance has been

ordered, the amount may be varied by the court if there has been a

material change of circumstances, of which evidence would have to be

provided by the applicant. The court has power to order either spouse

to provide details of his or her resources.

II. Conditions under which maintenance is paid

64. Do general conditions such as a lack of means and ability to pay suffice

for a general maintenance grant or do you need specific conditions such

as age, illness, duration of the marriage and the raising of children?

Please explain.

Maintenance of children under 16 is a separate issue, but may include

an element of the costs incurred by the spouse who is looking after

them. Any maintenance directly for the spouse has no specific

conditions.

65. To what extent does maintenance depend on reproachable behaviour or

fault on the part of the debtor during the marriage?

The court may take account of any conduct which has adversely

affected the financial resources relevant to the court’s decision on

financial provision, or which it would be manifestly inequitable to

ignore. This could therefore affect any continuing maintenance

payments ordered. There is also express power in section 18 of the

Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985 for the court to counteract any

transaction having the effect of defeating financial claims on divorce.

66. Is it relevant whether the lack of means has been caused by the marriage

(e.g. if one of the spouses has give up his/her work during the marriage)?

The relevance is to the capital provision made at the time of divorce.

Scotland

67. Must the claimant’s lack of means exist at the moment of divorce or at

another specific time?

At the time of divorce.

III. Content and extent of the maintenance claim

68. Can maintenance be claimed for a limited time-period only or may the

claim exist over a long period of time, maybe even lifelong?

The normal maximum period is three years. In exceptional

circumstances it may continue for a further specific period.

69. Is the amount of the maintenance granted determined according to the

standard of living during the marriage or according to, e.g. essential

needs?

According to the standard of living.

70. How is maintenance calculated? Are there rules relating to percentages

or fractional shares according to which the ex-spouses’ income is divided?

Is there a model prescribed by law or competent authority practice?

There are no formal rules. The award is at the discretion of the court,

taking account of the principles in the 1985 Act, but it will always be

for a specified short period.

71. What costs other than the normal costs of life may be demanded by the

claimant? (e.g. Necessary further professional qualifications? Costs of

health insurance? Costs of insurance for age or disability?)

The possible costs referred to will be taken into account in the capital

award and will not be part of continuing maintenance.

72. Is there a maximum limit to the maintenance that can be ordered?

No.

See Stott v Stott (1987) G.W.D. 17-645

Grounds for Divorce and Maintenance Between Former Spouses

73. Does the law provide for a reduction in the level of maintenance after a

certain time?

If ordered at all, it will cease entirely at the end of the adjustment

period.

74. In which way is the maintenance to be paid (periodical payments?

payment in kind? lump sum?)?

Any maintenance will be by periodical payments. The main settlement

is by lump sum or transfers of property at the time of the divorce.

75. Is the lump sum prescribed by law, can it be imposed by a court order or

may the claimant or the debtor opt for such a payment?

Not applicable.

76. Is there an (automatic) indexation of maintenance?

No.

77. How can the amount of maintenance be adjusted to changed

circumstances?

This can be done by application to the court on a material change of

circumstances.

IV. Details of calculating maintenance: Financial capacity of the

debtor

78. Do special rules exist according to which the debtor may always retain a

certain amount even if this means that he or she will not fully fulfil his

maintenance obligations?

No.

Scotland

79. To what extent, if at all, is an increase of the debtor’s income a) since the

separation, b) since the divorce, taken into account when calculating the

maintenance claim?

During the limited period for which maintenance may have been

ordered, a material change of the debtor’s financial situation could be

taken into account by the court.

80. How far do debts affect the debtor’s liability to pay maintenance?

Only if they amount to a material change of circumstances, and the

court would be very reluctant to reduce payments if it thought that the

debts had been deliberately incurred.

81. Can the debtor only rely on his or her other legal obligations or can he or

she also rely on his or her moral obligations in respect of other persons,

e.g. a de facto partner or a stepchild?

Moral obligations could be considered by the court as well as purely

legal obligations.

82. Can the debtor be asked to use his or her capital assets in order to fulfil

his or her maintenance obligations?

Yes.

83. Can a ‘fictional’ income be taken into account where the debtor is

refusing possible and reasonable gainful employment or where he or she

has deliberately given up such employment?

Yes.

84. Does the debtor’s social security benefits, which he or she receives or

could receive, have to be used for the performance of his or her

maintenance obligation? Which kinds of benefits have to be used for this

purpose?

This is difficult to answer in this form. Social security benefits would

normally have been amended by the social security authorities to

recognise the current situation of both spouses.

Grounds for Divorce and Maintenance Between Former Spouses

85. In respect of the debtor’s ability to pay, does the income (means) of his or

her new spouse, registered partner or de facto partner have to be taken

into account?

Technically not, but if the debtor is de facto being supported by a new

spouse, the debtor’s own resources released by that support would be

taken into account.

V. Details of calculating maintenance: The claimant’s lack of own

means

86. In what way will the claimant’s own income reduce his or her

maintenance claim? Is it relevant whether the income is derived, on the

one hand, from employment which can be reasonably expected or, on the

other, from employment which goes beyond what is reasonably expected?

All the considerations set out in Questions 86 to 90 will have been

taken into account by the court at the time of the financial settlement at

the divorce, by establishing appropriate capital sums. They would not

be relevant to any continuing maintenance for the period after the

divorce.

87. To what extent can the claimant be asked to seek gainful employment

before he or she may claim maintenance from the divorced spouse?

All the considerations set out in Questions 86 to 90 will have been

taken into account by the court at the time of the financial settlement at

the divorce, by establishing appropriate capital sums. They would not

be relevant to any continuing maintenance for the period after the

divorce.

88. Can the claimant be asked to use his or her capital assets, before he or she

may claim maintenance from the divorced spouse?

All the considerations set out in Questions 86 to 90 will have been

taken into account by the court at the time of the financial settlement at

the divorce, by establishing appropriate capital sums. They would not

be relevant to any continuing maintenance for the period after the

divorce.

Scotland

89. When calculating the claimant’s income and assets, to what extent are

the maintenance obligations of the claimant in relation to third persons

(e.g. children from an earlier marriage) taken into account?

All the considerations set out in Questions 86 to 90 will have been

taken into account by the court at the time of the financial settlement at

the divorce, by establishing appropriate capital sums. They would not

be relevant to any continuing maintenance for the period after the

divorce.

90. Are there social security benefits (e.g. income support, pensions) the

claimant receives which exclude his or her need according to the legal

rules and/or court practice? Where does the divorced spouse’s duty to

maintain rank in relation to the possibility for the claimant to seek social

security benefits?

All the considerations set out in Questions 86 to 90 will have been

taken into account by the court at the time of the financial settlement at

the divorce, by establishing appropriate capital sums. They would not

be relevant to any continuing maintenance for the period after the

divorce.

VI. Questions of priority of maintenance claims

91. How is the relationship between different maintenance claims

determined? Are there rules on the priority of claims?

Any maintenance will take the form of an order to pay a fixed sum

weekly or monthly for the period of adjustment to the new status. It is

therefore a debt created by an order of the court and may be enforced

by normal judicial procedures for enforcement of debts. If there has

been a material change of circumstances, the court may be asked to

vary the award, but otherwise the order remains in force for the period

specified by the court. The intention is that there should normally be a

clean break in financial terms (as well as in status) at the time of the

divorce.

Grounds for Divorce and Maintenance Between Former Spouses

92. Does the divorced spouse’s claim for maintenance rank ahead of the claim

of a new spouse (or registered partner) of the debtor?